<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Breast cancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/breast_cancer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Komen scandal: Goodbye, Karen Handel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/komen_scandal_goodbye_karen_handel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/komen_scandal_goodbye_karen_handel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan G. Komen Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12313561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One week after the foundation's blunder, its scandal-plagued V.P. steps down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was perhaps inevitable. But it speaks volumes nonetheless. On Tuesday morning, the Susan G. Komen Foundation announced that its vice president for public policy, Karen Handel, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/komen-vice-president-karen-handel-resigns/2012/02/07/gIQAYP0WwQ_blog.html">was resigning.</a></p><p>It was the latest very public – and very bitter – turn in a story that has thrown the traditionally esteemed Komen foundation for one hell of a loop. Just one week ago, Planned Parenthood announced that Komen was <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/the_fight_against_cancer_and_abortion/">halting its funding</a> for the organization's breast cancer screenings.  The move, the Komen foundation insisted, was about "the charity’s newly adopted criteria barring grants to organizations that are under investigation by local, state or federal authorities" – itself a dubious smear on a respected women's health organization. But it didn't take long for critics to note that Handel, who was hired just last year, had run for governor of Georgia on a platform of conspicuously anti-Planned Parenthood rhetoric. In 2010, she declared "I do not support the mission of Planned Parenthood," and that she "strongly supports" laws prohibiting "the use of taxpayer funds for abortions or abortion-related services." A lady like that in the driver's seat of your organization just as you're distancing yourself from Planned Parenthood looks like a whole more than a coincidence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/komen_scandal_goodbye_karen_handel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/komen_scandal_goodbye_karen_handel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan G. Komen’s priceless gift</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/susan_g_komen%e2%80%99s_priceless_gift/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/susan_g_komen%e2%80%99s_priceless_gift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12295261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A radical decision woke the country up to an alarming rightward drift, and gave new life to women’s health advocacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The startling intensity that we saw this week in response to Susan G. Komen for the Cure's decision to pull its grants from Planned Parenthood -- an intensity that prompted the Komen foundation to reverse its decision today -- may be the best thing that’s happened to the conversation about reproductive rights in this country for decades. It certainly should be.</p><p>Practically since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, reproductive rights activists have been left to play stilted defense against ideological opponents who grabbed the language of morality, life, love and family as their own, always deploying it with reference to the fetus. The rhetoric around reproductive rights, which has more recently begun to creep into arguments over contraception, has become suffocating in its emotional self-righteousness, but too muscular, too ubiquitous to effectively combat.</p><p>But the overreach by the Komen foundation, while surely intended to strike yet another blow on the side of antiabortion activism, succeeded instead in waking a powerful constituency -- armed with precisely the language and emotional heft they’ve been lacking for too long.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/susan_g_komen%e2%80%99s_priceless_gift/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/susan_g_komen%e2%80%99s_priceless_gift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Komen victim of &#8220;bullying,&#8221; sad abortion foe says</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/komen_victim_of_bullying_sad_abortion_foe_says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/komen_victim_of_bullying_sad_abortion_foe_says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12295101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone make an "It Gets Better" video for poor Kathryn Jean Lopez of the National Review]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Kathryn Jean Lopez, the National Review Online's resident delicate flower, anti-feminist traditional Catholic, and enemy of all homosexualists and abortionists. She was <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/289798/taking-back-pink-planned-parenthood-news-precious-reporting-kathryn-jean-lopez">so delighted</a> when Susan G. Komen for the Cure announced that it would no longer be sending grant money to Planned Parenthood to fund breast cancer screenings and mammogram referrals, because it meant that her side had "won" a battle in the war against women's health providers that perform abortions and provide contraception.</p><p>She was so excited, in fact, that she forgot that the decision was <em>NOT ABOUT ABORTION WHATEVER GAVE YOU THAT IDEA</em>. Later she posted that hilarious <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/289934/komen-explains-itself-kathryn-jean-lopez">YouTube video of Komen CEO Nancy Brinker</a> explaining that the Planned Parenthood decision was not in any way political, no sir. (At least one commenter noted the disconnect: "Really curious what K-Lo thinks Komen is actually doing here. When the news broke, she seemed pleased and pointed out right-to-lifers had been trying to force Komen to shuck PP. But she also believes Komen's [ridiculous] assertion that the decision has nothing to do with politics and was just a big coincidence? Hunh?")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/komen_victim_of_bullying_sad_abortion_foe_says/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/komen_victim_of_bullying_sad_abortion_foe_says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Internet changed Komen&#8217;s mind</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/how_the_internet_changed_komens_mind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/how_the_internet_changed_komens_mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan G. Komen for the Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12292051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The torrent of reactions to the cancer group's Planned Parenthood defunding proves the power of social media]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It started with a tweet. And in the end, that's what won the war. On Tuesday, Planned Parenthood sent out a no-punches-pulling alert that <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/PPact/status/164451036147355648">"Susan G. Komen caves under anti-choice pressure</a>, ends funding for breast cancer screenings at PP health centers." By Friday, Komen for the Cure had <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/statement-from-susan-g-komen-board-of-directors-and-founder-and-ceo-nancy-g-brinker-2012-02-03">said it was sorry, and reversed its decision. </a></p><p>Within minutes on <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/komen_for_the_cure_sells_out_women_again/singleton/">that Tuesday bombshell</a>, the tale had become not just a news story but a social media explosion, with a flurry of responses pouring out across Facebook, Twitter and <a href="http://apps.komen.org/Forums/ ">Komen's own message boards</a> – overwhelmingly disapproving of Komen for the Cure's severing of its ties to Planned Parenthood. And in the process, it became an object lesson in how to handle a crisis, how to make it worse, and then how to fix it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/how_the_internet_changed_komens_mind/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/how_the_internet_changed_komens_mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Komen for the Cure sells out women, again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/komen_for_the_cure_sells_out_women_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/komen_for_the_cure_sells_out_women_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12277751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pink-ribbon charity, with a Sarah Palin ally as senior policy director, turns its back on Planned Parenthood]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the good: Since its founding 30 years ago, Susan G. Komen for the Cure has put <a href="http://www.pjstar.com/news/x1685418888/U-S-House-honors-Nancy-Brinker">over a billion dollars</a> toward research, screening and awareness in the name of eradicating breast cancer. It's certainly no coincidence that in that same span of time, <a href="http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/news/News/report-breast-cancer-death-rates-decline-but-more-slowly-among-poor">breast cancer rates have declined sharply</a>, and what was once a devastating diagnosis is now, for many, a treatable condition.</p><p>Yet when the news broke Tuesday that Komen <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/the_fight_against_cancer_and_abortion/">was ending its funding for Planned Parenthood breast cancer screenings and services</a>, the organization's eagerness to throw Planned Parenthood – and the women who depend upon it – under the bus wasn't surprising. It's actually thoroughly <em>unshocking</em> for this venerated organization to pull such a crass, insensitive move.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/komen_for_the_cure_sells_out_women_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/komen_for_the_cure_sells_out_women_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>240</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best and worst tweets of the year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/the_best_and_worst_tweets_of_the_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/the_best_and_worst_tweets_of_the_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashton Kutcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lara Logan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10702531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Zuccotti Park to Tahrir Square, these tweets shook the world in 2011]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One hundred and forty characters can make or sink a career. They can start a movement. They can make history. We've witnessed for years now the power of social media – from bearing witness to the protests in Iran to providing a ringside seat to MIA's feud with Lynn Hirschberg. But in 2011, Twitter once again didn't just offer a bite-sized window into the news of the day – often enough, it became it. Whether they were funny, harrowing, or just plain ill advised, these were the tweets heard round the world.</p><p><em><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/nirrosen">"It's always wrong, that's obvious, but I'm rolling my eyes at all the attention she'll get."</a></em></p><p>While covering the Egyptian protests back in February, CBS reporter Lara Logan was separated from her crew and endured a horrifying sexual and physical assault. And when the news filtered out from Tahrir Square, New York University Center for Law and Security fellow Nir Rosen fired off <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/lara_logan_rape_reaction/">a torrent of scathing tweets</a> about the attack, admitting "She's so bad that I ran out of sympathy for her," and adding "it would have been funny if it happened to Anderson [Cooper] too." In the wake a furious backlash, Rosen swiftly deleted the tweets, apologized for his words, and resigned from NYU. Today, he's back on Twitter after a brief sabbatical, but as he wrote for Salon last winter, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/nir_rosen_explains_twitter_controversy/">"with 480 characters I undid a long career."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/the_best_and_worst_tweets_of_the_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/the_best_and_worst_tweets_of_the_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sometimes you can&#8217;t &#8220;save the ta-tas&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/sometimes_you_cant_save_the_ta_tas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/sometimes_you_cant_save_the_ta_tas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giuliana & Bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10296141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giuliana Rancic makes a radical choice, and reminds us there's more to fighting breast cancer than pink ribbons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a public conversation too many women have had lately. In the past few days, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/susannahbreslin/2011/11/28/the-business-about-my-breasts/4/ ">Forbes blogger Susannah Breslin</a> and <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2011/12/02/143072567/xeni-jardin-tells-twitter-fans-she-has-breast-cancer">Boing Boing's Xeni Jardin</a> have shared their diagnoses of breast cancer. Earlier this year, Wanda Sykes was likewise diagnosed and  underwent a double mastectomy. Now, E! host and reality star Giuliana Rancic, who disclosed her own breast cancer diagnosis in October, is speaking frankly about her choice to undergo a double mastectomy.</p><p>Rancic has made a career of destigmatizing tough – and often taboo -- health issues. She's chronicled her fertility struggles, a miscarriage and multiple rounds of IVF on"Giuliana &amp; Bill." That quest to become a mother is a big part of her decision to take an aggressive line on cancer. Speaking on the "Today" show Monday, Rancic explained that an earlier double lumpectomy had not been entirely effective, and why she's taking more drastic action.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/sometimes_you_cant_save_the_ta_tas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/sometimes_you_cant_save_the_ta_tas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why bigger breasts eased my cancer recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/why_bigger_breasts_eased_my_cancer_recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/why_bigger_breasts_eased_my_cancer_recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10147388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the mastectomy, I faced a dilemma: Should I reconstruct my body as it once was, or as I wish it had been?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“What size are you thinking?” the plastic surgeon asked.</p><p>I sat shirtless in the oversize, faux leather examining chair as he eyed the twin slits remaining on my chest four weeks after the mastectomy. I slipped a C-cup silicone breast prosthesis out of one side of the bra I’d worn into the office. “I used to be an A-cup. Can you match this?”</p><p>He palmed the three-dimensional, triangular blob and then pressed it against one of my incisions using the tips of his fingers to hold it in place. “I don’t see why not. You’re tall – you can carry any volume you want. Let’s go with a 350cc.”</p><p>He wheeled backward on his stool, opened a drawer and pulled out a crescent-shaped expander. I liked him immediately. He seemed practical, matter-of-fact in the wake of my cancer, the way I hoped in my best moments to be. He explained the surgery would involve placing two of these filled with saline in my chest to begin stretching the skin and muscle to shape mounds that would eventually house the implants.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/why_bigger_breasts_eased_my_cancer_recovery/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/why_bigger_breasts_eased_my_cancer_recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexing up breast cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/sexing_up_breast_cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/sexing_up_breast_cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10127779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're all aware of breast cancer, thanks. Time to call October what it is -- a month to leer, ogle and joke]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Are you doing it?" the "friendly reminder" asks. Guess what, ladies and gents? It's <a href="http://www.feelyourboobies.com/">"Feel Your Boobies Week" </a>again already.  And yes, in fact, I am doing it. If by "doing it," you mean horking in exasperation.</p><p>October has long been a veritable minefield of raunch and innuendo. For years,  we've gritted our teeth as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/21/halloween_14/">Halloween has morphed</a> from a festive, candy-getting opportunity into our National Day of Dressing Up Like Slutty Nurses. Now an opportunity to promote and encourage women's healthcare has deteriorated into a thinly veiled opportunity for ogling. Welcome to Sweater Meat Fest 2011. I mean, Breast Cancer Awareness month.</p><p>The wink-wink effect will always surround anything to do with such a fascinating, beautiful and powerfully erotic body part. But wasn't Breast Cancer Month sufficiently appalling when it jumped the shark into a big <a href="http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?page_id=13">branding opportunity</a>, a chance to doll up merchandise in pink and make a buck? Does it really now additionally have to be skanky? Not to mention tacky?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/sexing_up_breast_cancer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/sexing_up_breast_cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The wig I hope I never wear again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/breast_cancer_wig_in_closet_open2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/breast_cancer_wig_in_closet_open2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Person's Trash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/04/06/breast_cancer_wig_in_closet_open2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I had breast cancer, it helped me feel normal. Now, I keep it in the closet as a reminder of how far I've come]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breast cancer is stored on the top shelf of my closet, inside a box, where I don&#8217;t have to look at it. Most days I don&#8217;t even think about it.</p><p>It comes in the form of a wig.</p><p>Not just any old wig, a beautiful, custom-made, human hair wig that fit perfectly over my smooth bald head for nearly a year, giving the false impression to the world that I was in good health with my own mane of beautiful blond hair.</p><p>When a friend was diagnosed (the first in a series of six friends in four years since my diagnosis), I offered it to her as a gift that she could keep, pass on, throw away or burn, for all I cared.&#160;</p><p>She gladly accepted it.&#160; I was exuberant to let it go, like excess weight falling off my body, making me feel lithe, agile and aloft.</p><p>Within days it showed up on my doorstep with a note. "Sorry, it didn&#8217;t fit."</p><p>I held it cautiously like a snake I might pick up with a long, sturdy stick to keep it far from me until it could be tossed back into the woods where it belonged.</p><p>I could donate it to the American Cancer Society or just stuff it in the trash can, for that matter.&#160; I don't have to keep it, but old wives' tales run through my head like, "If you get rid of it, you&#8217;ll need it." Or, "If you keep it, you&#8217;ll never need it again."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/breast_cancer_wig_in_closet_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/breast_cancer_wig_in_closet_open2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hideous sweat shirt I can&#8217;t throw out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/28/teddy_bear_mourning_sweater_open2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/28/teddy_bear_mourning_sweater_open2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Person's Trash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/03/28/teddy_bear_mourning_sweater_open2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has a teddy bear on it. It's old and frayed. And yet, it's what my mother wore as she struggled for her life]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I sold my deceased parents' small row home in Philadelphia and moved to New York 22 years ago, I took very little with me. My husband and I were beginning our marriage in hospital housing where he was a resident. He had already decorated the place with his leopard sofa, platform bed, kilim and an inherited mid-century desk. There was room for me in his heart, but not for my parents' rickety formica kitchen table.</p><p>&#160;I knew that once I settled in New York, I would become assimilated into his family -- a large, Jewish, Ivy League-educated, highly bonded collection of people with no shortage of opinions or emotions. By contrast, I had two brothers, each addicted to his own brand of drugs and a widowed sister. My mother had gotten as far as fifth grade; my father, who died of alcoholic cirrhosis, was a graduate of trade school. I was ready to move on and begin a new life with nothing but a stuffed suitcase.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/28/teddy_bear_mourning_sweater_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/28/teddy_bear_mourning_sweater_open2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I blog so my kids can know me when I&#8217;m gone</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/21/i_blog_for_my_kids_open2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/21/i_blog_for_my_kids_open2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/01/21/i_blog_for_my_kids_open2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I got cancer, I realized I might not always be around for my children -- but my writing will be]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was an incredibly smarmy TV movie about a mother dying of cancer while fighting for custody of her daughter that was popular when I was a kid. I don't remember the title, but I do remember that Timothy Bottoms portrayed the heroic and long-suffering boyfriend and he was hot. Anyway, the movie was supposedly based on the journal of a dying mother of a small child. It was imbued with the kind of Hallmark Hall of Fame sweetness that makes me want to barf.</p><p>When I began blogging, I had been in remission from cancer for a whopping four weeks. I still wore scarves and baseball caps, but I was out of the house and doing stuff for the first time since my 52 weeks of chemotherapy and Herceptin, eight weeks of radiation, and recovery from what I thought at the time was the most serious surgery I would ever have.&#160;</p><p>I'd pressed my oncologist for surgery during a winter break from work. She'd replied, "But if you have the full course of chemo before surgery and radiation your chances of living five years increase to 37 percent." Those were grim odds.</p><p>That Christmas, I kept looking at my kids and running into my bedroom to cry: I wouldn't see the little one past the age of 10, I might not even see the older daughter graduate high school. I went a little crazy after that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/21/i_blog_for_my_kids_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/21/i_blog_for_my_kids_open2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How we wound up topless</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/04/breast_cancer_survivors_bare_all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/04/breast_cancer_survivors_bare_all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/12/04/breast_cancer_survivors_bare_all</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After you lose a breast to cancer, it's scary to strip in front of other people -- unless it's women just like you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few nights ago, I felt up five women.</p><p>I'm a happily married 42-year-old woman with an 8-year-old son. So how did I end up inside the bathroom of a downtown brew pub with my face in all those knockers, the bare breasts of a group of women I'd just met, with our shirts up and bras hoisted? All the stroking and pressing and gazing might sound like fodder for Penthouse forum.&#160;</p><p>Actually, we're all breast cancer patients and survivors.</p><p>Last summer, I had a mastectomy. I finished chemotherapy two weeks ago. December and the beginning of the new year will be filled with holiday celebrations -- and daily radiation. Currently, my left breast is stuffed with a rigid, plastic, saline-filled chest-expander, a space holder for my future silicone implant. The surgical swap out will happen next summer, after radiation is completed, and my skin has healed for the requisite six months.</p><p>How I long for a breast with a little softness and droop to it. How I look forward to having a breast that you'd want to have some fun with, not something you try not to bonk into. I don't exactly love having one perky, overly firm, scarred, bolt-upright breast and one natural, low-slung, post-nursing breast that I can practically tuck into my jeans. But I'll take these mismatched breasts any day. I'm alive, and I'm thankful.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/04/breast_cancer_survivors_bare_all/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/04/breast_cancer_survivors_bare_all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making sense of mammogram advice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/11/breast_cancer_screening_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/11/breast_cancer_screening_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/10/11/breast_cancer_screening</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The takeaway from recent studies is that screenings can help women under 50 -- but ultimately we need a better test]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us have been feeling jerked around lately when it comes to messages about mammograms (or Pap smears, but that's the subject of a different post). Last year, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force caused uproar by recommending that women begin regular mammograms at age 50. Then followed studies that cast doubt on the effectiveness of mammography screening in general and specifically among older women. And then, just to really mess with us, a Swedish study found that frequent mammograms could reduce breast cancer deaths by 29 percent. Well, today, an <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130437187">NPR article</a> does the best job I've seen of putting these conflicting facts in perspective.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/11/breast_cancer_screening_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/11/breast_cancer_screening_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The flirty fight against breast cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/i_like_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/i_like_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/10/06/i_like_it</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In yet another tiresome viral campaign, women update their Facebook status with where they "like it"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was already experiencing serious ocular strain from all the eye-rolling induced by <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/10/01/breast_cancer_month_overload/index.html">breast cancer awareness month</a> when then I came across the "I like it" campaign.&#160;It's yet another attempt at viral breast cancer activism via awkwardly sexual Facebook status updates. Last time around, <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2010/01/09/bra_status">women impishly posted the color of their bras</a> with no explanation. This time, ladies are telling us how and where they "like it." For example, "I&#160;like it on the bed." A&#160;sampling of recent "I likes" include: the kitchen table, the back seat of a car, my nightstand, the floor, in the closet, on the stairs, on a bar stool and on the washing machine. This is meant to raise awareness -- not about kinky female fantasies, but, inexplicably, breast cancer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/i_like_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/i_like_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More mixed messages on mammograms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/breast_cancer_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/breast_cancer_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/09/30/breast_cancer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study out of Sweden suggests that women in their 40s may benefit from regular screenings after all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember how a year ago a panel of experts recommended against mammogram screenings before the big 5-0? Well, now yet another group of smart people in lab coats is changing things up on you and suggesting that maybe 40-somethings should start getting mammograms after all.</p><p>The new study comes by way of Sweden, where some counties provide screenings to women in their 40s and some do not; researchers compared breast cancer deaths between those two populations and found that women were 26 percent less likely to die from breast cancer in the former group. This led Jennifer C. Obel of the American Society for Clinical Oncology&#160;to tell the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/health/research/30mammogram.html">New York Times</a> that women should "speak to their doctors about mammograms" once they hit 40.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/breast_cancer_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/breast_cancer_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I do not &#8220;(heart) boobies&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/02/i_love_boobies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/02/i_love_boobies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/09/02/i_love_boobies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People are taking offense at an edgy breast cancer slogan -- but for all the wrong reasons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schools across the country are banning rubber bracelets benefiting breast cancer activism -- all&#160;because they read,&#160;"I (heart) boobies." Administrators and parents are reacting to "boobies"&#160;as though it were a corrupting four-letter word from which we must protect our nation's youth. As though breasts themselves were obscene. As though they weren't a normal object of teenage lust. As though the First Amendment didn't exist.&#160;</p><p>But, you know what?&#160;I'm offended by the bracelets, too -- just for a very different reason.</p><p>A growing number of activist campaigns are attempting to raise awareness (and perhaps other things) by simplifying the fight against breast cancer as a fight to save breasts.&#160;Not people, but breasts. Of course the implication is that lives will also be saved, but "boobies" are treated as the real star of this show.&#160;There was the infamous&#160;<a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/24/boobs/index.html">"Save the Boobs" ad</a>, with a pair of bouncing bikini-clad breasts; the&#160;<a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/12/28/men_for_women">Men for Women Now</a>&#160;campaign, which features famous(ly fratty) male celebs waxing poetic about breasts;&#160;the push for women to <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2010/01/09/bra_status">reveal the color of their bra</a> in a Facebook status update; and the <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2008/01/11/booby_wall/index.html">Booby Wall</a>&#160;-- just to name a few.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/02/i_love_boobies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/02/i_love_boobies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The news that changed everything</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/kitchen_disposal_breast_cancer_open2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/kitchen_disposal_breast_cancer_open2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/07/28/kitchen_disposal_breast_cancer_open2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My wife and I bantered about a broken disposal and our daughter's braces. Then came the diagnosis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, my wife, and I are on our way to the big-box home store. Last year she gave me a home improvement book. In the book, people like me cut perfect circular holes in walls with handsaws for duct-work and installed high-voltage solar wind turbines on their own. I could no sooner do this than build you a rocket ship.</p><p>My wife's father was good with tools. You could give Ron a pile of leaves and a ball peen hammer and get back a new deck or those cabinets you wanted in the master bathroom. Give me a tile saw, a pile of tile and a perfect square to lay them down and you wouldn't get a recognizable pattern on the floor even if I was given all of geological time.</p><p>Now she's complaining about my driving but I'm not listening.&#160;I'm actually a very good driver, though I occasionally have premature turnage. I turn too early. I've tried thinking about baseball and rare birds but I can't help it.&#160;</p><p>We drive into the hot-tub store, one stop too early, and I try to fake it, suggesting that maybe we ought to look at hot tubs, but Terry points out that we already have a hot tub and it works just fine and I suggest it's never too soon to think about replacing it given the new Oxygenators that self-clean but she's heard these sorts of creative noises before. I have to navigate the minivan in a K-turn so that we can pull back out into traffic (while she sighs loudly) and into the home store lot which is an awkward sort of live-with-your-screw-up-for-a-while experience.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/kitchen_disposal_breast_cancer_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/kitchen_disposal_breast_cancer_open2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More mixed messages on breast cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/20/breast_cancer_screening/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/20/breast_cancer_screening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/20/breast_cancer_screening</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early mammograms and biopsies often turn up errors and misdiagnoses, says a new report]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as the White House is affirming breast cancer screenings as key preventive care that will soon be accessible without co-pay, here comes news that the earliest screenings and biopsies are often pockmarked with errors. A New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/health/20cancer.html?_r=1&amp;src=me&amp;ref=homepage">report</a> tells of cases like Monica Long, a nurse in northern Michigan, who was diagnosed with breast cancer after an early biopsy. She went through radiation, a partial mastectomy, and no small amount of emotional turmoil &#8212; only to learn, a year and a half later, that she probably didn't have cancer at all.</p><p>It's devastating. It's deplorable. It's other dramatic adjectives as well &#8212; but the most frightening one of all is that it is common.</p><p>How does it happen?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/20/breast_cancer_screening/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/20/breast_cancer_screening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should we be pushing mammograms?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/mammogram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/mammogram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/06/30/mammogram</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers suggest that our money could be better spent developing more effective breast cancer tests]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers recently set out to determine the most effective way to encourage women to undergo regular mammogram screenings, and the results disappoint: All approaches show a very small impact and there isn't enough evidence to determine which is best. In other words:&#160;They all kinda suck.</p><p>You might ask whether there's a better way to allocate resources -- or at least that's the question&#160;doctors Jeanne Mandelblatt and Diana Buist raise in an editorial in the <a href="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/djq240v1">Journal of the National Cancer Institute (PDF).</a> Given contradictory evidence as to the effectiveness of regular mammograms, the recent <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/12/03/mammogram_update">recommendation</a> <em>against</em> regular screening for women in their 40s, the risk for <a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/beyond-apples/201006/the-case-the-woman-who-refused-her-mammogram">false negatives, false positives and overdiagnosis</a>, and the aforementioned suckiness of intervention attempts, we might be better off spending money on new, more effective screening methods. "It could be reasonably argued that we should better spend our efforts in discovering better early detection tests rather than continuing to invest in getting a few more women to regularly use a flawed technology,"&#160;they write.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/mammogram/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/mammogram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

