Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 5:30 PM UTC
Giuliana Rancic makes a radical choice, and reminds us there's more to fighting breast cancer than pink ribbons
By Mary Elizabeth Williams
Giuliana Rancic (Credit: AP/Charles Sykes)
It’s a public conversation too many women have had lately. In the past few days, Forbes blogger Susannah Breslin and Boing Boing’s Xeni Jardin have shared their diagnoses of breast cancer. Earlier this year, Wanda Sykes was likewise diagnosed and underwent a double mastectomy. Now, E! host and reality star Giuliana Rancic, who disclosed her own breast cancer diagnosis in October, is speaking frankly about her choice to undergo a double mastectomy.
Rancic has made a career of destigmatizing tough – and often taboo — health issues. She’s chronicled her fertility struggles, a miscarriage and multiple rounds of IVF on”Giuliana & Bill.” That quest to become a mother is a big part of her decision to take an aggressive line on cancer. Speaking on the “Today” show Monday, Rancic explained that an earlier double lumpectomy had not been entirely effective, and why she’s taking more drastic action.
“If I’d chosen to just do another lumpectomy and then do radiation, and then do anti-estrogen therapy, which means two to five years of medication, that basically puts me into early menopause,” she said. “Then I would have to put off having a baby for several years. So that was something we took into account.”
Despite the pink-ribboned ubiquity of breast cancer in our consciousness, the difficult and emotional tradeoffs of treatment are still tricky to talk about. We may be shrouded in October gluts of rah-rah empowerment, but the ways in which cancer can cut to the core of female identity are sometimes pushed aside.
Generations ago, a breast cancer diagnosis was even more ominous than it is now, and radical surgery was the go-to option. Back then, trailblazers like first lady Betty Ford and NBC correspondent Betty Rollin took the sticky, oversexualized subjects of breasts and breast health and brought them into public consciousness. In her memoir “First, You Cry,” Rollin admitted to initially feeling “ugly and freaky” after a mastectomy, and showed that grieving for a lost body part isn’t tantamount to ingratitude for healing.
That concept is still not an easy thing to reconcile – and in some ways, it’s harder than ever. Thanks to awareness campaigns and early detection, more women are surviving cancer without mastectomy, and without compromising their childbearing ability. But breast cancer campaigns now are so wrapped up in the notion of “saving the ta-tas” and how awesome “boobies” are that the realities of losing breasts or fertility are rarely acknowledged.
But the sense of loss is no less acute. In “Cancer Vixen,” cartoonist Marisa Acocella Marchetto writes poignantly of going on Tamoxifen after her breast cancer, and saying goodbye to the child she’d always thought she’d have. “I’m sorry,” she says in a conversation with her imaginary baby. “I thought I had all the time in the world, when all I had was the blink of an eye.”
When I began my own most recent round of cancer treatment, one of the first things my nurse said was, “You’re happy with your two kids, right? Because you can’t get pregnant again now.” Each doctor visit is now accompanied by a pregnancy test to assure that I’ve kept my word. Similarly, as I’ve watched cancer scorch through my social circle in the past few years, I’ve seen friends suddenly faced with mastectomies, hysterectomies and treatment choices that dramatically altered their family planning desires. And regardless of our relationship statuses or the size of your family, there’s a whole different set of unexpected feelings to deal with when you’re facing cancer, a profound change in your body and a possible screeching halt to your fertile years.
As more of us opt to start families later, more of us will, unfortunately, find our baby-making time of life overlapping with the cancer-getting one. At 37, Rancic still hopes that losing her breasts will mean gaining a child. As she explained on “Today,” “It was not an easy decision, but it was the best decision for me … One of my first thoughts I had when I started considering the mastectomy was, ‘What am I going to look like?’ And then, ‘What will my husband think?’” She says that her husband, Bill, assured her, “‘I don’t care what you look like. I don’t care about the physical portion of this. I just need you around for the next 50 years, so let’s get you healthy.’ And that helped me come to a decision.”
Simply by acknowledging “the physical portion,” Rancic raises a very different – and much needed – awareness that all those pink ribbons and jiggle-centric PSAs do not. There’s nothing demure or ladylike or sexed up about cancer. It affects what kind of woman we see when we look in the mirror, and, often, how many children we’ll get to have. And sometimes, saving a life means not saving the “boobies.”
Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 12:00 AM UTC
After the mastectomy, I faced a dilemma: Should I reconstruct my body as it once was, or as I wish it had been?
By Wendy Colbert
“What size are you thinking?” the plastic surgeon asked.
I sat shirtless in the oversize, faux leather examining chair as he eyed the twin slits remaining on my chest four weeks after the mastectomy. I slipped a C-cup silicone breast prosthesis out of one side of the bra I’d worn into the office. “I used to be an A-cup. Can you match this?”
He palmed the three-dimensional, triangular blob and then pressed it against one of my incisions using the tips of his fingers to hold it in place. “I don’t see why not. You’re tall – you can carry any volume you want. Let’s go with a 350cc.”
He wheeled backward on his stool, opened a drawer and pulled out a crescent-shaped expander. I liked him immediately. He seemed practical, matter-of-fact in the wake of my cancer, the way I hoped in my best moments to be. He explained the surgery would involve placing two of these filled with saline in my chest to begin stretching the skin and muscle to shape mounds that would eventually house the implants.
After being diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer at age 43, I viewed my choice to have a mastectomy and then reconstruct my breasts as a privilege. My grandmother died of metastasized cancer in her 40s. My mom had a lumpectomy and radiation following her diagnosis of cancer in her 40s. I realized many women with more advanced breast cancer didn’t have a choice of treatment options. Still, I wondered about the function my new breasts would serve. I no longer needed them for any practical purpose, such as breast-feeding. I would no longer derive the same sexual satisfaction from them, since they would be numb and my nipples were gone. Would they be purely cosmetic, as the title on my doctor’s business card implied? If so, what was the right size for me?
A couple of weeks earlier, right after I’d had my post-mastectomy drainage tubes removed, I’d visited Mary Catherine’s, a boutique in Seattle that specialized in mastectomy wear, to try on prostheses and bras.
A woman in her 50s in polyester pants, pink lipstick and bright white bouffant hair that flipped up in a curl once it passed her shoulders asked if she could assist me. I wondered if she was a breast cancer survivor herself. She led me to one of the changing rooms. I winced when a twinge of pain spiked across my chest as she helped me slip my shirt and camisole off. She asked me what size I’d like to try on. “Let’s start with a C,” I said.
As I waited, I glanced in the mirror and saw the two strips of surgical tape that remained over the horizontal incisions on my chest, and the tan lines from my pre-surgery trip to Hawaii that started at my shoulders and led to nowhere. The tan was fading, and my skin was beginning to peel off in little white flecks.
She brought in the first bra and a couple of boxes with different types of prostheses. “Most insurance covers the standard silicone – see how heavy that is. If you want to pay extra, you can get this new, whipped silicone, which is in the same shape, but much lighter and more comfortable to wear. Since you’ll only be using yours for a couple of months, though, you probably just want to go with the standard.”
I nodded in agreement and she showed me how to fold the heavier prosthesis like a taco to fit it into the pocket in the bra. She gently slid the bra straps over my arms and up on my shoulders, and hooked it together in back, and I slipped my shirt on over it. They were too pointy and cone-like – more like what women wore in the 1950s. Next, please.
The next set I tried on felt more comfortable – I liked the way I looked in the mirror.
“Why don’t I try on a D just for the heck of it?” I asked the shop lady.
D felt too big on me – I thought it made me look wider in my chest than I would naturally be. I settled on the second prosthesis I had tried that was a full C cup – one or two cup sizes bigger than I’d been just before the mastectomy – and about the size I’d been in college, pre-kids.
As I thought about my ideal size in the dressing room, I tried to separate my own preference from the expectations of society, media and men. Wasn’t the purpose of reconstruction to replicate what you had lost? I knew what middle-aged women’s breasts were supposed to look like. I remembered sitting on my knees on shag carpet on sun-drenched afternoons thumbing through a stack of my parents’ National Geographic magazines. The image of flaccid, elongated tissue with a surprising turned-up nipple on the end stayed with me. After using my breasts to nourish my infant son for a year, I hadn’t expected them to pop back up to their pre-baby bounty. The replacements the surgeon could give me would not look natural in any real sense. They would be fuller and rounder than middle-aged women’s breasts, regardless of the size I chose.
Now I sat, bare-topped and scarred, glancing over the plastic surgeon’s shoulder at creamy brown walls holding strictly aligned, framed black-and-white photographs depicting nature’s perfection: sailboats thrusting through currents and mountain ranges piercing cloudless skies.
I asked, “Why is there this myth that mastectomy is such an emotionally devastating surgery?”
“Because it’s mutilating,” he replied. “It’s more like removing a hand than an appendix.”
Because of my family’s history of cancer, since my 20s I’d imagined what course I would take if I received the dreaded diagnosis one day. I knew early on that I would choose to have my breasts removed, and didn’t view the possibility as any more difficult than the issues my friends would deal with in their midlife. By the time we hit our 40s, we’ve all known pain – it’s been layered on us like so many coats of paint. Who’s to say which heartbreak is the greatest – losing a child or never having a romantic relationship? Surviving cancer or having a mentally ill son? All painful life events gouge deep furrows and cause emotions to bleed out of us – shock, sorrow and dismay. Through these tragedies, we are constantly rediscovering ourselves, peeling off the personas we’ve created to fit in socially and reaching for the unaltered seed of self within us. We’ll never completely know our raw core – never completely be able to separate the white of external influences from the yolk of our true selves. But we can ask the questions, keep on with the quest.
Why did I want new breasts and a larger cup size? For reasons of vanity. For my husband’s sexual pleasure (since he’d be able to feel them and I wouldn’t). And so I could deal with the emotional pain of removing my breasts privately by “passing” in society’s eyes. My new breasts would be more than cosmetic. They served a practical purpose. They would help me conceal the worst of this injury even from myself.
Continue Reading
Close
Thursday, Oct 20, 2011 1:00 PM UTC
We're all aware of breast cancer, thanks. Time to call October what it is -- a month to leer, ogle and joke
By Mary Elizabeth Williams
(Credit: iStockphoto/dubassy)
“Are you doing it?” the “friendly reminder” asks. Guess what, ladies and gents? It’s “Feel Your Boobies Week” again already. And yes, in fact, I am doing it. If by “doing it,” you mean horking in exasperation.
October has long been a veritable minefield of raunch and innuendo. For years, we’ve gritted our teeth as Halloween has morphed from a festive, candy-getting opportunity into our National Day of Dressing Up Like Slutty Nurses. Now an opportunity to promote and encourage women’s healthcare has deteriorated into a thinly veiled opportunity for ogling. Welcome to Sweater Meat Fest 2011. I mean, Breast Cancer Awareness month.
The wink-wink effect will always surround anything to do with such a fascinating, beautiful and powerfully erotic body part. But wasn’t Breast Cancer Month sufficiently appalling when it jumped the shark into a big branding opportunity, a chance to doll up merchandise in pink and make a buck? Does it really now additionally have to be skanky? Not to mention tacky?
Think I’m exaggerating? Already this month, a high school cheerleading team in Arizona landed in hot water for printing T-shirts that read, “Feel for lumps. Save your bumps.” Lingerie company Journelle is meanwhile encouraging women to “Save the tatas.” Hipstamatic has released a limited edition We Heart Boobies Goodpak to benefit vaguely defined “breast cancer charities.” In Canada, roller derby queens have sold off casts of their breasts in the name of “boobies” care. There’s even a boobies bus.
I understand. Breasts are awesome, whereas cancer is terrifying. The desire to tame a disease, to wrangle it with cuteness and a side of sex, is perhaps a natural response. If by doing so, money goes to research and women remember to get their health screenings, that’s not a bad thing. But I’m just warning you, this is how something like Kris Carr happens, folks. Cancer is so totally bangable! In, like, an adorable, Zooey Deschanel-like, girl-next-door way!
Tatas? Feel your boobies? Seriously? What are we, 12? It’s somehow at once both lecherous and infantilizing. And as a friend recently eye-rolled, “Is there anybody who isn’t ‘aware’ of breast cancer by now?” At this point, it’s damn near impossible not to feel a sharp pang of sympathy for the many diseases that ravage less sexually arousing body parts. There are no leering campaigns for leukemia. You can’t build a double-entendre empire around non-Hodgkin lymphoma. And I’m saying this as someone fortunate enough to have cancer of the skin, which conveniently lends itself to all kinds of nudity-related “awareness.”
With each passing October, the cult of Breast Cancer Awareness feels exponentially less like empowerment for women — of every size and age and level of allurement — and more like one big autumnal grope-fest. The incentive of a long and healthy life is plenty sexy enough for a whole lot of us. You can be firmly in the “I don’t like cancer” camp and still call shenanigans on straight-up exploitation. And you can believe in the value of eradicating disease without baby talk, without condescension, and without, even, the enticement of giving somebody a boner.
Continue Reading
Close
Wednesday, Apr 6, 2011 6:45 PM UTC
When I had breast cancer, it helped me feel normal. Now, I keep it in the closet as a reminder of how far I've come
By Laurie Turner
A photo of the author's wig
Breast cancer is stored on the top shelf of my closet, inside a box, where I don’t have to look at it. Most days I don’t even think about it.
It comes in the form of a wig.
Not just any old wig, a beautiful, custom-made, human hair wig that fit perfectly over my smooth bald head for nearly a year, giving the false impression to the world that I was in good health with my own mane of beautiful blond hair.
When a friend was diagnosed (the first in a series of six friends in four years since my diagnosis), I offered it to her as a gift that she could keep, pass on, throw away or burn, for all I cared.
She gladly accepted it. I was exuberant to let it go, like excess weight falling off my body, making me feel lithe, agile and aloft.
Within days it showed up on my doorstep with a note. “Sorry, it didn’t fit.”
I held it cautiously like a snake I might pick up with a long, sturdy stick to keep it far from me until it could be tossed back into the woods where it belonged.
I could donate it to the American Cancer Society or just stuff it in the trash can, for that matter. I don’t have to keep it, but old wives’ tales run through my head like, “If you get rid of it, you’ll need it.” Or, “If you keep it, you’ll never need it again.”
So I keep it, granting it some kind of cancer-fighting power that will protect me from ever having to be caught up in the maelstrom of a cancer war again.
I tried to give it away at least three times but it kept coming back with comments about it being too small. Stupid small head anyway, I thought as I marched upstairs to store it for the last time.
I climbed on the stool, reached for the designated floral hat box on the top shelf of my closet, and stuffed it back in there for permanent keeping. Maybe the fact that it kept coming back to me was another sign that I needed to keep it. Whatever works, right? Storing a wig in my closet is a small price to pay for being cancer-free.
I know this is insane, but old wives’ tales or not, I’m keeping that wig forever because getting rid of it makes me feel as naked, vulnerable and afraid as the day I looked into the mirror and saw a bald woman reflected in the glass, and realized it was me.
Continue Reading
Close
Monday, Mar 28, 2011 8:07 PM UTC
It has a teddy bear on it. It's old and frayed. And yet, it's what my mother wore as she struggled for her life
By Patricia Kenet
When I sold my deceased parents’ small row home in Philadelphia and moved to New York 22 years ago, I took very little with me. My husband and I were beginning our marriage in hospital housing where he was a resident. He had already decorated the place with his leopard sofa, platform bed, kilim and an inherited mid-century desk. There was room for me in his heart, but not for my parents’ rickety formica kitchen table.
I knew that once I settled in New York, I would become assimilated into his family — a large, Jewish, Ivy League-educated, highly bonded collection of people with no shortage of opinions or emotions. By contrast, I had two brothers, each addicted to his own brand of drugs and a widowed sister. My mother had gotten as far as fifth grade; my father, who died of alcoholic cirrhosis, was a graduate of trade school. I was ready to move on and begin a new life with nothing but a stuffed suitcase.
Still, I wanted something besides photographs to remember my parents by. I found it in my mother’s messy bureau — a white sweat shirt, washed, worn, stained, with a tacky picture of a teddy bear under the words “I Am Loved.” She had worn it frequently after her mastectomy noting how soft it was; she wore it after chemo when her skin had felt itchy and flushed. After she died, it became my father’s official suit of mourning. He puttered around the house in it, sipped his beer and worked on the backyard roses. It was his way of holding on, which he could only manage for a few more years.
So when the time came for me to choose an item on the day I left, I took the sweat shirt to New York. Later I moved it from our small subsidized apartment to our larger rent-controlled one, and finally to our brownstone where there is more than enough space. Now, it’s folded on a shelf next to Sephora shopping bags, designer scarves, above my daughter Isabelle’s artwork.
Two months ago, when I was diagnosed with breast cancer, I took the sweat shirt down and considered trying it on — just to see how it felt after the surgery. I placed it against my chest, regarded myself in the mirror. It wasn’t just a reminder of Mom; it was a vestige of a time past when women like my mother weren’t even offered the option of reconstruction.
I put the sweat shirt back in the drawer. Me, I am happy in my snug jog bra and a V-neck T-shirt, grateful I had only a small incision and a guarantee of long-term survival. But, if I ever need the shirt, I’ll know where to find it.
Continue Reading
Close
Friday, Jan 21, 2011 9:01 PM UTC
After I got cancer, I realized I might not always be around for my children -- but my writing will be
By Dorinda Fox
(Credit: Picasa 2.6)
There was an incredibly smarmy TV movie about a mother dying of cancer while fighting for custody of her daughter that was popular when I was a kid. I don’t remember the title, but I do remember that Timothy Bottoms portrayed the heroic and long-suffering boyfriend and he was hot. Anyway, the movie was supposedly based on the journal of a dying mother of a small child. It was imbued with the kind of Hallmark Hall of Fame sweetness that makes me want to barf.
When I began blogging, I had been in remission from cancer for a whopping four weeks. I still wore scarves and baseball caps, but I was out of the house and doing stuff for the first time since my 52 weeks of chemotherapy and Herceptin, eight weeks of radiation, and recovery from what I thought at the time was the most serious surgery I would ever have.
I’d pressed my oncologist for surgery during a winter break from work. She’d replied, “But if you have the full course of chemo before surgery and radiation your chances of living five years increase to 37 percent.” Those were grim odds.
That Christmas, I kept looking at my kids and running into my bedroom to cry: I wouldn’t see the little one past the age of 10, I might not even see the older daughter graduate high school. I went a little crazy after that.
So my online presence was a direct result of illness. My primary goal was to leave a record of who I was. I didn’t want my kids to rely on my family and ex-husband for their memories of me. I wanted them to have a permanent record of my impressions of childhood, joys and travails in adulthood. I wanted them to know my thoughts on literature and politics, my assignments for the writing classes I teach, my plain old whining bitchiness at times.
Have I disclosed too much? Well, I have disclosed a lot. And this has been a problem for me in my professional life, as it must be for the two other women named Dr. Dorinda Fox. (To them I can only say: sorry.) But if a bus hits me tomorrow, then my kids know who their mom was.
They know what made her cry. They know what made her laugh. They know who was important in her life. They know why she was driven to run off to Ireland by herself, to not give a damn about keeping the house clean, and how she rebuilt a life.
And a funny thing happened on the way to the archive. Just when I thought I was safe and on to a new chapter in my life and not alone … I learned I was not part of the lucky 37 percent.
The cancer had returned with a vengeance, and I needed a radical mastectomy requiring a long, painful reconstruction. Now it is very unlikely the cancer will return, because it has no place to go. (My breasts are not breasts, they just play them on TV.)
And my body was totally resculpted. My stomach is now my chest. When I wore a clingy jersey dress for work the other day a few students asked why I was dressed as Jessica Rabbit. Life is weird. I am almost 50. See me roar.
But I am here. All of me. Along the way I learned to tell my own stories and to resist mentioning others unless the reference was positive. I learned that many times even a positive reference is not appreciated. Now I ask permission.
When teaching I tell students I am serious about keeping the personal and political out of the classroom because I write about that elsewhere. I have to because in the days of Google they will find me and most likely ask, “WTF?”
However, when meeting a new friend or health professional I direct them to my blog and tell them to let me know if they have any questions. Most don’t. Informational overload is already available. If they are still around after reading, then we’ve skipped months of get-to-know-you conversations and can spend time on more enjoyable pursuits. If they so choose, these people know why I was naked and terrifying a public official on the day Reagan was first elected as president and why I think Jake DeSantis was a whiny banker representing the absolute worst of Wall Street entitlement.
They know how fiercely I love my children and how I regret at times failing them. They know how hard I fought to be here writing and to live my life and not the life others would choose for me.
I was a woman who was terrified of just about everything before I went online. I still have fears. I just don’t let them cage me in. There isn’t anything to hide anymore. Google it. It is there as it was meant to be.
I love you, Tyler. I love you, Molly. Read all about it.
Continue Reading
Close
Page
2
of
14
in
Breast cancer