<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > British Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/british_election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why the GOP should be worried about England</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/austerity_in_england_backfires/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/austerity_in_england_backfires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/01/25/austerity_in_england_backfires</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British government announced huge spending cuts and economic growth promptly went into decline]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a radical suggestion for how President Obama should kick off his State of the Union speech: Why not point out today's news from the United Kingdom -- a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70O2PI20110125l">surprising fourth quarter decline in GDP</a> -- and argue that the same dire fate might await the U.S. if Republicans succeed in their dream of sharply slashing the federal budget this year?</p><p>Here's the back story. Wasting no time, the new coalition U.K. government led by Prime Minister David Cameron, made <a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2026641,00.html">a dramatic package of government spending cuts</a> its first order of business. Many U.S. conservatives have looked with great longing at the austerity surge. The numbers are staggering -- an average 19 percent cut for all government departments, resulting in half a million public sector layoffs.</p><p>And look! Just as the Keynesians predicted, the economy immediately slumped, apparently proving that the last thing a government should do in a weak economic climate is suddenly kick the legs out of the demand side of the economy. It could happen here, Obama should argue! It's still too soon, and the U.S. economy is too fragile, to make austerity the watchword of the day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/austerity_in_england_backfires/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/austerity_in_england_backfires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.K. election update: Tory, Lib Dem coalition back on track? (Update: Brown resigns, Cameron new PM)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/uk_election_libdem_tories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/uk_election_libdem_tories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/11/uk_election_libdem_tories</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The details are still fuzzy (and complicated) but Prime Minister Gordon Brown may step down tonight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talks between the UK's Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats have collapsed, various sources are reporting. <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23832558-david-cameron-its-decision-time-for-lib-dems.do">The Evening Standard says</a> Labor leader and Prime Minister Gordon Brown will resign tonight. The LibDems are supposedly set to make a governing pact with the Tories, which would make Conservative Party leader David Cameron Britain's new Prime Minister.</p><p>After the recent national election, Labour holds 258 seats, the Tories have 306, and the Lib Dems hold 57 seats. A Tory/LibDem coalition could form a majority government, but Labour and the LibDems would've needed local nationalist and socialist parties to join a coalition.</p><p>The Lib Dems may not form a full-blown coalition with the Tories. Another strong possibility <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/10/what-does-confidence-and-supply-mean">is something called "confidence and supply</a>," which forms a minority government that isn't in constant danger of a vote of no confidence dissolving the government.</p><p>You can follow BBC news live <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/election2010/liveevent/">here.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/uk_election_libdem_tories/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/uk_election_libdem_tories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Daily Show on Britain&#8217;s indecisive election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/daily_show_british_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/daily_show_british_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/11/daily_show_british_election</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Cream is going unclotted! Tea is being taken at 2:15!"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, if the British parties can't hash something out by next week, the Queen will appoint her corgi, Sir Winston Furchill, as prime minister. After all, they're not about to put the cat, Margaret Scratcher, in charge.</p><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="353" style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245);" width="360">
<tbody>
<tr style="background-color: rgb(229, 229, 229);" valign="middle">
<td style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;">
          <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">The Daily Show With Jon Stewart</a>
        </td>
<td style="padding: 2px 5px 0px; text-align: right; font-weight: bold;">Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 14px;" valign="middle">
<td colspan="2" style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;">
          <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-may-10-2010/clustershag-to-10-downing---hung-parliament" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">Clustershag to 10 Downing - Hung Parliament</a>
        </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 14px; background-color: rgb(53, 53, 53);" valign="middle">
<td colspan="2" style="padding: 2px 5px 0px; overflow: hidden; width: 360px; text-align: right;">
          <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/" style="color: rgb(150, 222, 255); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">www.thedailyshow.com</a>
        </td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td colspan="2" style="padding: 0px;">
          <embed allowfullscreen="true" allownetworking="all" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" flashvars="autoPlay=false" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:309126" style="display: block;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" wmode="window"></embed>
        </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 18px;" valign="middle">
<td colspan="2" style="padding: 0px;">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="100%" style="margin: 0px; text-align: center;" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr valign="middle">
<td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;">
                  <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/" style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>
                </td>
<td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;">
                  <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com" style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Political Humor</a>
                </td>
<td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;">
                  <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/videos/tag/Tea+Party" style="font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Tea Party</a>
                </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/daily_show_british_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/daily_show_british_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prime Minister Gordon Brown steps down, U.K. still has no government</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/gordon_brown_steps_down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/gordon_brown_steps_down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/10/gordon_brown_steps_down</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Labour Party leader sacrifices his job to create a "progressive majority" government with the Lib Dems]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordon Brown, the intensely unlikable soon-to-be-former prime minster of the U.K., just announced that <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/10/general-election-2010-live-blog">he will step down as the leader of the Labour Party.</a></p><p>Brown's move looks like an attempt to stop the Liberal Democrats from forming a coalition government with the Conservatives, who won the most seats in last Thursday's national elections, but who didn't win enough to form a government. No one's sure how well the Lib Dem/Tory negotiations are going; some Tories say they're going well, but Tory right-winger Iain Duncan-Smith said today that the Tories are uninterested in electoral reform, a Lib Dem priority that would end "first-past-the-post" elections and help third parties pick up more seats in Parliament.</p><p>
    <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/10/general-election-2010-live-blog">According to the Guardian:</a>
  </p><blockquote>
<p>Brown is proposing a "progressive" government, comprising Labour, the Lib Dems, and presumably the SNP, Plaid Cymru, the SDLP and the Alliance. Electoral reform would be a priority.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/gordon_brown_steps_down/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/gordon_brown_steps_down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Penn is wrong about literally everything</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/mark_penn_moron_nick_clegg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/mark_penn_moron_nick_clegg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/07/mark_penn_moron_nick_clegg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pollster Grifter says Nick Clegg's victory will show the power of political independence (and then Nick lost)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to being a highly paid charlatan, <a href="http://gawker.com/5216545/pollster-grifter-bilks-innocent-secretary-out-of-23-million">Pollster Grifter</a> Mark Penn is epically, heroically <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/feature/2008/02/11/penn_memo/">wrong</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2008/12/11/mark_penn_has_a_new_gig">about everything.</a></p><p>Yesterday, as British voters were heading to the polls, he wrote a wonderful column <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/05/AR2010050505056.html">for the Washington Post</a>. The column is a love letter to the legendary Independent Voter. Penn's entire argument is predicated on the success of Britain's Nick Clegg, the leader of the Liberal-Democrat party. Penn says the inevitable, stunning success of that third party will definitively prove that Mark Penn is always, always right when he says that America is full of independents who think about things the same way that Mark Penn does:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/mark_penn_moron_nick_clegg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/mark_penn_moron_nick_clegg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What on earth just happened in the British election?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/british_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/british_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/07/british_election</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And what comes next?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The British have had their election. So what the hell does it mean?</p><p>In some ways, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8667071.stm">yesterday's results</a> were more ordinary than anyone expected from what was a genuinely unusual campaign: the unpopular incumbent Labour Party took a hit, though not as bad as expected. Labour's been cut down to 29 percent of the vote, which won the party 253 seats, so far, out of the 650-member House of Commons. (The counting isn't all the way done yet.)</p><p>The once-hated Conservatives (also known as the Tories), after spending 13 years out of power trying to reinvent themselves, managed to retake a narrow plurality. They've won 36 percent of the vote, and 298 seats.</p><p>And the Liberal Democrats, long stuck in a distant third place, stayed there. Voter disgust with both major parties failed to materialize into the expected surge for the center-left third party, which got 23 percent of the vote. Breaking all expectations, the Lib Dems actually suffered a net loss of six seats in Parliament (again, according to the count so far), bringing them down to 53 in total.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/british_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/british_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why a Tory win might not be good news for the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/democrat_anita_dunn_works_for_tories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/democrat_anita_dunn_works_for_tories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/06/democrat_anita_dunn_works_for_tories</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British Conservatives are well to the left of U.S. Republicans -- just ask former Obama aide Anita Dunn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans here are <a href="http://www.thenextright.com/patrick-ruffini/tories-likely-headed-to-overall-majority-today?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheNextRight+%28The+Next+Right%29">increasingly</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/LCGpolling/status/13087680103">excited</a> about the British elections Thursday, in which the Conservative Party looks like it will do far better than the governing Labour Party or the newly trendy third party, the Liberal Democrats. So let's see. Resounding loss in parliamentary elections for the left-wing party in power in an English-speaking nation: That sounds like good news for Republicans before our own November midterms, no?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/democrat_anita_dunn_works_for_tories/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/democrat_anita_dunn_works_for_tories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What would happen if an American politician called someone a bigot?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/29/brown_immigration_dysfunction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/29/brown_immigration_dysfunction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/29/brown_immigration_dysfunction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gordon Brown, the "bigot," and the dysfunctional relationship of elites and the working class]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a pensioner named Gillian Duffy <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8649448.stm">asked</a> British Prime Minister Gordon Brown about welfare cheats and "all these eastern Europeans that are coming in." He accidentally <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/04/28/gordon_brown_bigoted_woman_britain/index.html">called her</a> "bigoted" on a live microphone, and now his campaign to keep his job as British prime minister is imploding. Watching this meltdown happen, I keep wanting to feel bad for the guy, and then as soon as I let myself, I get mad at him all over again.</p><p>What&#8217;s going on here?</p><p>Immigration politics are a little different, country to country, but not that different. Here's how it breaks down in the U.K.: The Conservatives are fairly akin to America's Republican Party, as the least bashful representatives of British nationalism on the scene. Meanwhile, Britain's two left-of-center parties align with the two faces of our Democrats.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/29/brown_immigration_dysfunction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/29/brown_immigration_dysfunction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gordon Brown&#8217;s &#8220;bigoted&#8221; comment hinders campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/eu_britain_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/eu_britain_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/04/28/eu_britain_election</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British prime minister insults a woman in response to immigration policy questioning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He's lost one vote -- but did British Prime Minister Gordon Brown's gaffe just cost him the election?</p><p>Brown made the first major flub of the country's short campaign season Wednesday, caught on an open microphone calling a 65-year-old voter a "bigoted woman" after she pressed him on immigration during a public meeting.</p><p>The British leader, said to have a sharp temper, raged at an aide after mixing with voters in northern England -- but failed to notice he was still wearing a TV microphone, or that it was recording.</p><p>It's the latest in a long line of missteps by lawmakers whose private remarks have been made accidentally public -- from President Ronald Reagan's 1984 joke declaration of war on Russia to President George W. Bush's overly familiar "Yo, Blair" greeting in 2006 for Brown's predecessor, Tony Blair.</p><p>And Brown isn't the first British leader caught off-guard -- in 1993, then-Prime Minister John Major was recorded calling rebellious members of his Cabinet "bastards."</p><p>But the political consequences of his blunder could be severe, with Brown already third in opinion polls for Britain's May 6 election and desperate to show his supposedly statesmanlike credentials to dispatch less experienced rivals, Conservative leader David Cameron and Nick Clegg of the Liberal Democrats.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/eu_britain_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/eu_britain_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will British voters go with their guts?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/british_election_ext2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/british_election_ext2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/04/27/british_election_ext2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since voting for the Liberal Democrats isn't a "wasted vote" anymore, the British third party is expecting a surge]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I teach strategic voting to my undergraduates, I define it as an instance where people rank candidates or parties in the order they would prefer to see them elected, and then subsequently choose <em>not</em> to vote for whomever they rank first. By contrast, a sincere voter votes for her first choice. There are a variety of reasons why voters might choose to vote strategically (e.g., they might want to <a href="http://homepages.nyu.edu/~jat7/Meirowitz_Tucker_2007.pdf">send a message</a> to a candidate running in a subsequent election, or they might want to <a href="http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521436206">moderate policy outcomes</a>), but the most popular reason in the literature seems to be that voters do not want to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Making-Votes-Count-Coordination-Institutions/dp/0521585279">waste their vote</a> by voting for a candidate who has no chance of winning the election; this is also known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_voting">tactical voting</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/british_election_ext2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/british_election_ext2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs faces questions in Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/18/eu_goldman_sachs_europe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/18/eu_goldman_sachs_europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/04/18/eu_goldman_sachs_europe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[European leaders react to a Goldman Sachs backlash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goldman Sachs is facing a potential backlash in Europe over the fraud case brought against it in the United States, with Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown calling for authorities there to investigate and accusing the investment bank of "moral bankruptcy."</p><p>Germany also said it would ask for detailed information about the case.</p><p>Both governments had to bail out banks that lost hundreds of millions of dollars on investments marketed by Goldman, according to the fraud suit brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, in Britain's case Royal Bank of Scotland through its acquisition of parts of ABN Amro.</p><p>The SEC said the Royal Bank of Scotland paid Goldman $841 million to unwind ABN Amro transactions. Royal Bank of Scotland is now 84 percent owned by British taxpayers after being partly nationalized by the government.</p><p>Germany's IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, an early victim of the credit crunch, lost nearly all its $150 million investment, the SEC said.</p><p>Brown on Sunday called for a full inquiry by Britain's Financial Services Authority in conjunction with the SEC. Britain would join Germany, where government officials said they would seek information about the bank's activities.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/18/eu_goldman_sachs_europe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/18/eu_goldman_sachs_europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiger favorite for Masters with British bookies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/glf_woods_odds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/glf_woods_odds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/03/16/glf_woods_odds</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[England's sports books have Woods leading the probability pack for Augusta winners]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite not competing since his car crash in November, Tiger Woods is still the favorite to win the Masters.</p><p>Barely an hour after the announcement Tuesday that Woods will make his return at Augusta National next month, the British bookmaker William Hill installed him the 4-1 favorite. Phil Mickelson is second at 6-1, followed by Padraig Harrington at 16-1.</p><p>Hill also lists Woods as 1-20 to make the cut at the Masters. He is 25-1 to win all four majors this year.</p><p>"All the major courses are Tiger's favorites, so despite a terrible beginning we think that 2010 will end up being terrific for Tiger," William Hill spokesman Rupert Adams said in a statement.</p><p>Woods has not played competitively since crashing his car into a tree outside his Florida home, setting off revelations he had been cheating on his wife.</p><p>"We're pleased to hear that Tiger is to return to golf," Royal &amp; Ancient Golf Club spokesman Malcolm Booth said. "Golf needs the world No. 1 to be playing."</p><p>The Royal &amp; Ancient, golf's governing body sport outside the United States, hopes Woods will play at the British Open in July.</p><p>Woods has not yet entered to play at the British Open at St. Andrews, but has until May 27 to send his entry form. Booth said it's "normal" that he hasn't entered yet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/glf_woods_odds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/glf_woods_odds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Ghost Writer&#8221;: Polanski strikes back</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/ghost_writer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/ghost_writer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Polanski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ghost Writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrillers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/02/18/ghost_writer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If audiences can get past the scandal surrounding it, the director's latest is a canny, claustrophobic thriller]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there really were no such thing as bad publicity, I suppose we'd see curious crowds lining up around the block for the premiere of "The Ghost Writer." Instead, Roman Polanski's canny and claustrophobic new thriller, which stars Pierce Brosnan as a semi-disgraced former British prime minister and Ewan McGregor as the naive writer hired to ghost his autobiography -- offers a strange combination of marketing disaster and crisis-management test case. The film's American distributor is releasing it cautiously, on a small scale, and Brosnan and McGregor were unleashed on the press this week, in an apparent effort to refocus attention on Polanski's work and career rather than his past misdeeds and current legal predicament.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/ghost_writer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/ghost_writer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remember the illegal destruction of Iraq?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/iraq_43/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/iraq_43/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington, D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald//2010/01/29/iraq</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Britain formally investigates whether their actions were criminal, while we look away ever more steadfastly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>British political news has been consumed for the last several weeks by a formal inquiry into the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/26/iraq-war-illegal-chilcot-inquiry">illegality</a> and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jan/29/tony-blair-chilcot-iraq-inquiry">deceit</a> behind Tony Blair's decision to join the&#160;U.S. in invading Iraq. &#160;Today, Blair himself is <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2010/jan/29/iraq-war-inquiry-tonyblair">publicly testifying</a> before the investigative commission and is being grilled about <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jan/29/tony-blair-chilcot-iraq-inquiry">numerous false claims he made</a> in the run-up to the war, not only about Iraqi weapons programs (his <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/12/09/wmd">taxi-cab-derived "45-minutes-to-launch!!"&#160;warning</a>)&#160;and Saddam's ties to Al Qaeda, but also about secret commitments he made to join the U.S. at a time when he and Bush were still pretending that they were undecided and awaiting the outcome of the&#160;U.N. negotiations and the inspection process.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/iraq_43/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/iraq_43/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>905</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kraft-Cadbury deal could create world&#8217;s biggest candy company</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/19/kraft_cadbury/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/19/kraft_cadbury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/2010/01/19/kraft_cadbury</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.K.'s Cadbury agrees to a takeover bid from Kraft food giant -- but some Brits aren't thrilled]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>British candy company Cadbury agreed to a fattened $19.5 billion takeover offer from U.S. food group Kraft in a deal that would create the world's biggest chocolate maker.</p><p>The board of Cadbury PLC, maker of Creme Eggs and Dentyne gum, gave up a four-month fight to remain independent and on Tuesday recommended shareholders take Kraft's offer of 840 pence ($13.78) per share, amounting to 11.9 billion pounds.</p><p>Cadbury shareholders would also get a 10 pence dividend previously promised by Cadbury.</p><p>The revised bid is for 500 pence cash and 0.1874 new Kraft shares for each Cadbury share, still somewhat less than some analysts believed the company is worth but 50 percent higher than Cadbury's market value before Kraft went public with its approach in September.</p><p>A previous offer of 10.5 billion pounds ($17.1 billion) valued Cadbury at about 770 pence, but was dismissed by Cadbury as "derisory."</p><p>Kraft Foods Inc., maker of Toblerone chocoloate, Velveeta processed cheese and Oreo cookies, still has to persuade a majority of Cadbury shareholders to accept the deal, and the door remains open until 7 a.m. (0200 GMT) Monday for The Hershey Co. to jump in with a rival bid.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/19/kraft_cadbury/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/19/kraft_cadbury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British hostage in Iraq freed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/30/iraq_hostage_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/30/iraq_hostage_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2009/12/30/iraq_hostage_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man abducted in Baghdad by armed militants is let go  after 2 and a half years in captivity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A British man abducted in Baghdad by armed militants disguised as policemen was freed Wednesday, alive and remarkably well after 2 1/2 years in captivity, the British government said.</p><p>Computer consultant Peter Moore, who was handed over to Iraqi authorities Wednesday morning, is believed to be the only survivor of a group of five Britons abducted in a daring raid outside Iraq's Finance Ministry in May 2007. Moore was taken along with his four British bodyguards.</p><p>Foreign Secretary David Miliband said Moore, 36, was in good health at the British Embassy in Baghdad.</p><p>"I have just had a very moving conversation with Peter himself," Miliband said. He said Moore was "in a remarkable frame of mind" given his ordeal.</p><p>"He is obviously, to put it mildly, absolutely delighted at his release."</p><p>Miliband said Moore would soon return home to Britain. He said Britain had not made concessions to the hostage-takers, but would not say whether a deal had been done between the Iraqi government and the kidnappers. He said Moore's release was the result of the reconciliation process between Iraq's government and armed groups willing to renounce violence.</p><p>"It is the result of some very hard work on the part of the Iraqi authorities," Miliband said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/30/iraq_hostage_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/30/iraq_hostage_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama takes new, harder line on Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/25/iran_39/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/25/iran_39/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Sarkozy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/25/iran</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president talks tough after news of an additional Iranian uranium enrichment facility ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama, joined by British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy, announced to the world Friday morning that Iran has a secret uranium enrichment facility that it's hidden from weapons inspectors for years.</p><p>He didn't sound happy about it.</p><p>American intelligence has reportedly known about the facility for some time; the decision to reveal it came because, the New York Times says, "Iran discovered, in recent weeks, that Western intelligence agencies had breached the secrecy surrounding the complex." The country has since officially acknowledged the existence of the plant.</p><p>From Obama's statement:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/25/iran_39/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/25/iran_39/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I love Britain&#8217;s socialized healthcare system</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/22/nhs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/22/nhs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/08/22/nhs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I learned when my newborn daughter was very sick, in U.K. hospitals, people take care of each other]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My eldest daughter had a rough first week. Born after 22 hours of hard labor, her pink skin proceeded to turn an alarming shade of yellow on the second day of her life. It was a bad case of jaundice. She would need to be placed in an incubator, whose ultraviolet light would hopefully clear up the condition. If not, a transfusion would be required. My exhausted wife and I watched in numb horror as our child was encased in the clear plastic box that was to become her crib for the next seven days. What we had hoped would be a straightforward delivery had turned into a nightmare.</p><p>Because I am American, and those endless days and nights were spent in a maternity hospital in London, the week that followed has been very much on my mind as I listen to the recent attacks on the British National Health Service. It is a system that I found to be very different from the one currently being described as "evil" and "Orwellian" by politicians and commentators eager to use it as an example of the dark side of public medicine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/22/nhs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/22/nhs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>291</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winston Churchill was a Bolshevik</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/14/healthcare_28/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/14/healthcare_28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2009/08/14/healthcare</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guess who helped launch socialized healthcare in the U.K.? The ultimate conservative icon -- and he was proud of it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long before many of today&#8217;s frothing right-wing demagogues were born, American conservatives came to idolize Winston Churchill, the late Tory prime minister whose wartime leadership of the British people transformed into the living symbol of democracy armed. That reputation was cemented by his legendary Missouri speech in 1946 warning of the &#8220;Iron Curtain&#8221; drawn by the Soviet Communists across Eastern Europe. Indeed, journalists and bloggers on the right admire the old warhorse so much that <a href="http://www.rightwingnews.com/blogsel/20greatsright.php">he has even outpolled Ronald Reagan</a> as their &#8220;Man of the Century.&#8221;</p><p>Yet by the standards of the present moment, as these same conservatives mobilize against health care reform to &#8220;stop socialism,&#8221; that same great man was actually a raving Bolshevik. For among his most enduring legacies was the founding and sustenance of the system that became the National Health Service. Arguably as much as any other British politician, it was Churchill who established &#8220;socialized medicine.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/14/healthcare_28/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/14/healthcare_28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>118</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British like their healthcare, don&#8217;t care what you think</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/14/british_nhs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/14/british_nhs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/08/14/british_nhs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP thinks the U.K.'s system is a dystopian nightmare; the Brits think the GOP should be quiet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Mick Jagger sings the song &#8220;Dear Doctor,&#8221; he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Izocw5U2nUM">sort of fakes</a> an American accent. After all, the song&#8217;s protagonist asks his doctor to cut out his heart, and only in the wild and wooly free healthcare market of the U.S. would any sawbones with an ounce of ethics consider such a thing. But hey, to Republicans, that&#8217;s probably a plus about the American system. Pay for what you want, right?</p><p>In fact, it's lately been one of the GOP's favorite touchstones in the healthcare debate. Republicans love to talk about lines for care in the U.K.&#8217;s stolid socialized system: Go on the government&#8217;s dime for medicine, and you&#8217;ll die waiting for that easy surgery!</p><p>Seeking to play up this groundbreaking &#8220;Be frightened of England&#8221; angle, the Republican National Committee ran a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEvb4xVMP4g">web ad</a> warning, "In Great Britain, individuals lose their right to make their own health care choices.&#8221; The Club for Growth, a conservative group, has a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ulMj3SNtMI">spot</a> claiming that British bureaucrats pegged the value of six months of life at $22,750. &#8220;Under their socialized system, if your treatment costs more, you're out of luck,&#8221; the ad's narrator says as the spot cuts back and forth from weeping elderly people to Big Ben and the British flag.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/14/british_nhs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/14/british_nhs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

