British Election

Swampy Fever Sweeps England

From the tabloids to the Times, the British press is swooning for a long-haired, lovable eco-protester bearing a boggy moniker.

  • more
    • All Share Services

a scruffy 23-year-old anti-roads protester known as Swampy is England’s newest folk hero. Swampy (not his real name) entered the national consciousness in the last week of January when, with four others, he hid out in a series of interconnecting burrows dug deep under the path of a controversial motorway extension. It took the authorities more than a week — with the assistance of cavers, climbers, tunneling specialists, carpenters, police negotiators, ground radar and remote video cameras — to shore up the makeshift tunnels, navigate the homemade barricades and find and evict all five. Swampy was the last to come out.

When he finally did surface, the story had been headline news for days and people were curious about the man with the endearingly wacky name. What they saw when they turned on the television news that evening was a slight, smiling, long-haired young man emerging from his underground maze into a horde of shouting, jostling journalists and cameramen. “Swampy, Swampy, why did you do it,” shouted the reporters. Swampy smiled beatifically at the crowd and with a Jimmy Stewart shrug said, “If I had written a letter to my MP, would you all be here now? I think not.” With that, a star was born.

Swampy, it transpired, was really Daniel Hooper, the son of middle-class parents and, according to his old schoolmaster, a bright student. Looking for clues to his character, the Daily Telegraph dispatched a reporter to interview his mother. Under the headline “Swampy the tunnel master has a soft spot for mother,” the staunchly conservative paper revealed that he was not simply a “human mole” and “the doyen of the burrowing road protesters,” but “a loving son who telephoned his mother regularly to tell her he was all right.” His good manners (“If I burp, I say excuse me. I don’t put my elbows on the table,” he told one reporter, with just a hint of exasperation) and his laid-back style (when tunnelers finally reached him, he said, “I was lying down reading my book and eating bourbon creams”) took the sting out of his rebellious activities. Rupert Murdoch’s Sunday Times ran an article comparing Swampy and the other roads protesters to Robin Hood and saying that in their struggle against the obliteration of the English countryside, they were acting as “freeborn Englishmen” and keeping alive England’s “romantic vision of ourselves as a greenwood people.”

The tabloids were not to be left behind in the Swampy sweepstakes. As one tabloid editor put it, “He’s great copy. He’s called Swampy. He digs in the earth. He doesn’t say very much because it’s actions not words. He doesn’t go out to harm people. His hairstyle is like nothing on earth and he has that slightly bemused but inoffensive look. He could open a supermarket and we’d be there. That would be a big photograph for us. If he had a child it would be Son of Swampy on the front page.” The Sunday Mirror offered him a weekly column in which to put forward his views on life. The Daily Express wanted to cut his hair and put him on its front page wearing Armani. A producer asked him to cut a version of that old standard “I am a mole and I live in a hole,” with a backup group to be known as the Swamp Girls. He took on the column, which became one of the Mirror’s most popular features (all proceeds to the cause), and he tried on the Armani (though he was never again seen in a suit), but he turned down his opportunity for pop stardom.

The word “swampy” began to signify more than a certain type of wetland. Everyone knew what you meant if you said, “Well I’m not super swampy, but I do try to recycle.” The actress Emmanuelle Beart was said to be in danger of losing her cosmetics contract with Dior due to her refusal to wear make-up and her tendency to dress in “swampy-style” clothes.

In the months after the end of the tunnel siege, the country continued in the grip of Swampy fever. His move to a protest camp in the path of a proposed second runway for Manchester airport was faithfully reported, as were his various court appearances. The discovery that he had a girlfriend, a fellow protester who shared a treehouse with him at the Manchester runway site, was national news. (The Daily Mail’s full-page story, accompanied by photos of the lucky lass, was headlined “Swampy’s girl: she’s got the scraggly hair and sloppy jumpers that will warm the heart of an eco-warrior.”) It was front page news when he announced he was standing for Parliament under the slogan “Dig for Victory,” and front page news again the next day when the papers had to acknowledge that they had been taken in by an April Fools joke. Meanwhile he had succeeded in publicizing a 10-point “Don’t Fly, Don’t Drive” manifesto. If he had run, he might not have done badly: An election poll found that he was twice as well known as the Transport Secretary, Sir George Young. Perhaps it was this fact that drove one of Young’s junior ministers to say he’d like to see Swampy “buried in concrete.”

What is really noteworthy about the Swampy story is that, thanks to him, direct action protesters are no longer seen as filthy, drug-abusing welfare scroungers and eco-terrorists, but as idealistic young people who have put their lives on hold to defend the endangered English landscape on behalf of the entire nation. Many middle-class, Tory-voting parents seem to see their own youthful idealism, and their children’s, reflected in Swampy. He has sparked what the Times calls “the rediscovery of rebelliousness among Britain’s bourgeoisie.” Volvo wives, the British equivalent of soccer moms, have come out in force to help the Manchester airport protesters, bringing them food, recharging their portable phones, baby-sitting their pets and, in the words of journalist Stephen Farrell, “drawing on years of experience preparing school lunchboxes” to give each protester a sealed “eviction box” packed with food and puzzles for when they are arrested.

Even government ministers are beginning to be swamped. In March, Steven Norris, the Tory transport minister in charge of a controversial road scheme at Newbury (Swampy’s hometown), came out in public against the road, saying that he had always felt that the protesters were right to oppose it. The applause Norris received for his courageous public recantation was somewhat diminished by the fact that it came more than a year after he had ordered the protesters evicted and the road-building begun — and just a few weeks before his planned retirement from Parliament. The new Labor government has promised a more restrained approach to road-building. Swampy will be watching.

Catherine Caufield's latest book is "Masters of Illusion: The World Bank and the Poverty of Nations" (Henry Holt).

champagne socialists of the world, unite!

Tina Brown, Harold Evans and Lauren Hutton cheer Tony Blair, re-discover their socialist roots and cry in their (French) champagne.

  • more
    • All Share Services

NEW YORK –

even for those who’ve earned their fame penning clever phrases
for the hungry masses, this item seemed almost too perfect to be real:
Happy champagne socialists gather in Pravda on May Day!

If you weren’t in the British town of Sedgefield listening to Prime
Minister-elect Tony Blair expound on the country’s “decent values,” then the
place to be May 1, Thursday night, was in the dim concrete basement of
Pravda, one of Manhattan’s trendier Lower East Side bars. There, the Labor
Party’s 100 or so New York exiles drowned nearly two decades of bad memories
with (French!) champagne, ending years when most have slunk around this
little island, rather than their own, having nary a good word to say about
their home.

As Britain’s Independent Television News flashed Labor victory after Labor
victory
on the television screens around the bar, the atmosphere
in Pravda became positively tearful.

New Yorker editor Tina Brown parked herself in a corner for most of the
night, telling every journalist who’d listen how “alienated” she’d felt from
Britain all these years, and how at that moment, she was gripped with an
intense feeling of homesickness. Left unsaid, perhaps, was a slight twinge of
unease from the less-than-flattering portrait in her magazine last month of
her new prime minister, written by “Primary Colors” author Joe Klein.

Alongside her was her husband, Random House editor Harold Evans, who acted as
a kind of unofficial celebratory host, making the rounds with a
large Labor-red rosette pinned to his lapel.

“I’ve lived through many elections and always been very independent,” he
said, as if to remind those too young to know that one of the most powerful
U.S. publishers was once one of the most powerful British newspaper editors.
Then, dropping his voice, he confessed that his father, a die-hard Laborite
who’d been a steam-train driver, had been appalled that he’d once voted
Conservative. “Now I feel in touch with my roots more than ever,” Evans said.

Others rediscovering their roots included British comedian and television
actor Robbie Coltrane (“Cracker”) and Harper’s Bazaar editor Elizabeth
Tilberis. Times of
London correspondent James Bone offered a handy tip to the bouncers, anxious
to keep some underage Brits outside in the very-British rain. “Ask them if
they remember the last Labor government,” he said. “If the answer’s yes,
they’re old enough to come in.”

So where were the Tory expats this night?

“There aren’t any,” said Ian Williams, a freelance British journalist in New
York. “At least not that we can find.” He should know: Williams said he and
Vanity Fair writer (and regular Salon contributor) Christopher
Hitchens
had spent weeks attempting to organize a televised debate
against Conservatives in the United States. They tried National Review
editor John O’Sullivan, Williams said, but when O’Sullivan
canceled, they ran dry. “We couldn’t find anyone else.”

And what led Lauren Hutton to bounce through the doorway late in the evening,
breaking the little-black-dress code with leggings and a purple blouse? No
one remembered her having a British accent.

Hutton laughed when asked. “Cumbria, you know. Before 1717. Then, we all
wound up in Mississippi, but there are still 27 English hamlets called
Hutton, so I feel connected. Maybe all the bullshit there will end, and
things will be better.” Then, mulling over her British roots, Hutton blew
smoke in my face and added: “I also had two British lovers for a long time
who I’ll love forever … although they took quite some training.”

By the time Tony Blair appeared on screen to declare victory, the air had
totally fogged with cigarette smoke, and two bleary-eyed men slumped against
a door post, one in a red bow tie, toasting the moment with half-empty glasses
of beer.

Shooting a glance at them, Williams said: “I have a dreadful suspicion I’m
going to turn out to be a champagne socialist.”


exit, pursued by cops
With “The World’s Scariest Police Chases,” parts I and II, the Fox Network has transformed high-speed lunacy into an extreme spectator sport — and picked up some 100 mph ratings.

BY G. BEATO

given O.J. Simpson’s killer ratings on the afternoon and early evening of June 17, 1994, it’s a wonder it took almost three years for the normally quick Fox Network to jump on the latest cash cow: the police chase.

Now the network is making up for lost time. “The World’s Scariest Police Chases” first aired on Feb. 2; it scored so well in the Nielsens that Fox reran it just a month later. And when this second showing earned Fox’s highest ratings for the week, besting even “The X-Files,” the network knew it was onto something. Hence, “The World’s Scariest Police Chases II,” which aired last Sunday, and, if history is any indication, will be airing again real soon.

The World’s Scariest shows share a Sunday night time slot on Fox with similar programming: The last few months have brought us “World’s Most Incredible Animal Rescues,” “World’s Funniest Kids Outtakes,” “World’s Funniest Party Disasters,” “World’s Funniest Outtakes No. 5″ and “TV’s Funniest News Outtakes,” among others. Assembled from sound stage and newsroom leftovers, with the occasional contribution from the at-home video chef, these shows are a textbook example of late-’90s media repurposing — they even manage to appropriate material from each other on a regular basis. They’re perfect programs for an age of media overload: cheap, appealing to camcorder buffs, fragmentary and non-linear, offering the illusion of channel-surfing without actually requiring anyone to change the channel. It’s no coincidence that Fox positions the “World’s Whateverest Whatevers” series against Mike Wallace and company: it’s the post-MTV challenger to the standard-bearer of old-fashioned linear television. It’s “60 Seconds” vs. “60 Minutes.”

Even among its low-budget brethren, however, “World’s Scariest Police Chases” stands out as a triumph of economy. While the “Funniest” shows employ a celebrity host and a studio audience to generate laughs and “awwws” and applause on cue, “Police Chases” requires no such trappings. All that’s needed are a few clips of Oregon Sheriff and “Cops” alumnus John Bunnell in front of a patrol car, a few sound bites from various other officers and the car chase clips themselves. An audience and a set would make it only too obvious that the show is selling cheap, voyeuristic thrills, rather than — as its producers like to pretend by having narrator Bunnell mouth vague moral platitudes — providing some form of “public service.”

One of the more entertaining aspects of “Police Chases” is the live commentary from reporters in TV news helicopters. With sweeping aerial shots revealing potential paths of escape and imminent obstacles, the reporters approach the situation as if doing play-by-play for a new extreme sport. Gearing up for their version of the home run call — “Oh, he just broadsided a white Buick!” — they describe various car-chase techniques and subtleties that would otherwise escape the casual viewer. Upon hearing them smoothly toss off obscure car-chase jargon like the “hit maneuver” and “spike strips,” you can’t help but wonder how often these reporters document this sort of thing.

The main attraction, of course, is the car chases themselves. Almost every clip has its own small-scale quirk or innovation — a driver going the wrong way down a highway at 70 mph; frustrated New Zealand cops throwing their night sticks at a car that keeps managing to elude them. And of course there’s the added frisson of their stranger-than-fiction reality: Yes, some kid in a stolen 40-foot motor home actually thought he could outrun the police (and the news copters, which are, in fact, far more tenacious pursuers) by going off-road into the Southern California desert. Where exactly did he think he was going to hide?

Despite their winning singularities, the chases all follow the same inevitable plot: Out-of-control driver endangers pedestrians and other motorists; police officers, often out of control themselves, attempt to run the driver off the road; driver continues his flight even as his tires blow out and his car showers sparks in its wake; driver hits another car, or a tree, or a lamp post; car comes to a violent halt; driver tumbles out of it and continues his improbable escape on foot; a dozen screaming cops jump on him and get in as many subtle whacks as the video cameras will permit. After a dozen scenes like this (the show is an hour long, and the clips run anywhere from a few seconds to a few minutes), the dramatic tension begins to fade. Monotony at 100 mph is as boring as monotony at half that speed.

On occasion, however, “Police Chases” takes a more personal look at the captured drivers, and these moments are always fascinating. A man who stole a $100,000 Bentley from a showroom and led a convoy of cops on a long, low-speed chase calmly asks, “Why all the trouble? I was just minding my own business, only going 30 miles per hour.” Another man, who kidnapped a woman and then led the police on a long, dangerous chase, yells out a jury-rigged justification: “Everything I do I treat people with love!” As anyone who’s ever fled from the cops knows, you’ve got to change speeds now and then to keep things interesting.

Continue Reading Close

Vivienne Walt is a frequent contributor to Salon. She was recently on assignments in Russia, Zimbabwe and Iran.

Abroad

The travel phermone

  • more
    • All Share Services

“Bloody hell,” Magda said. We were surveying the bar at The Mean Fiddler, a sweaty, smoky club in North London. We were here to see The Chills, a noisy and melodic band from New Zealand. Magda was trying to negotiate an opening in the mostly male crowd. “Excuse me please,” she said in her nicest, most BBC accent, and the boys with their overflowing pint glasses of Guinness gladly stepped back, watching us.

She handed me a glass with a thimble’s measure of Jameson. “Did you want a large? I mean, what do you Americans call it, a double?” she said.

“How about a quadruple? No, this is fine. No wonder your country has a drinking problem, with measly shots like this.”

There are a couple things I like about the English, all having to do with politeness. Magda, who’s Irish, will tell you that the English are most polite when they’re seething, and you’ve got to admire a country that has its hypocrisy so firmly established. The other is this tradition of buying drinks all around: four people in your group means four drinks, whether you want one or not. We passed drinks back to Magda’s boyfriend Christian and his friend Andrew, who thanked us profusely.

“Just wait till you get to Ireland,” said Christian. I’d arrived in London this morning, and my head felt like a rotting peach: fuzzy, soft and collapsing. Dizziness came in waves, tempered by adrenalin.

Yet there’s no better drug than being in a foreign land. The Travel Pheromone: once it wafts through the air, you can pretty much count on having your pick of the litter. One whiff of “she’s available, she wants to, she’s unattached,” and, best of all, “she’s leaving the country,” and girls, you’ll be fighting ‘em off.

“Courtney’s brought one condom on her trip,” I hear Magda telling the boys.

“Yes, I’m thinking of holding an auction,” I said. Andrew — silent, red-haired, watching me the way one might an exotic bug that has just flown into your house and landed on your knee — politely smiled and took a large swig of Guinness.

If you know a better aphrodisiac than travel, I commend you. What is more thrilling than surveying a room where no one knows you, where difficulties in communication are rooted more in language than in meaning, where you can assume just about any character you please? Tonight, and perhaps for the rest of the journey, I decided I was going to be Moll Flanders.

Anyone who reads this column knows I disdain meeting on planes, the Net, bars; there are just too many variables to contend with. In real life, there are explanations to be given, consequences to be endured. But traveling is not real life. All bets are off.

I thought about my friend Carol who, on the eve of her trip to Italy, was told by the guy she’d been seeing that he was going to start dating other people. Great, she said through a clenched smile. Once in Rome, she stood on a streetcorner looking at a map, looking around quizically, and it wasn’t long until Luigi zipped up on his moped and offered assistance in finding the Spanish Steps. It also wasn’t long until he took her home, sneaking her into his tiny apartment that night (like most Italian men, he still lived with Mama) so they could fuck like rabbits. “But it wasn’t that good,” Carol told me. “He kept wanting to do it up the ass. Supposedly it’s an Italian thing, so the girls can stay virgins. I finally said to him, ‘Dude, we’re not going there.’ He got kind of pouty.”

Now, looking at this mob of young guys at the Mean Fiddler, I wondered who might become my Luigi. Andrew was out of the question; he was a friend of Christian’s, and although amusing (“Does he keep singing ‘I love my little jacket’?” he asked me in the middle of the set) he happened to be getting married next week. I thought about Carol’s story — at least I wouldn’t have to contend with that back-door negotiation with English guys — and I noted there were at least five men within 15 feet that I could be persuaded to get to know better. One of them, a tallish sort wearing a black sweater with red and blue stripes and a gentle look about him, held my gaze just a little longer than normal. Good. The T.P. was kicking in.

Unfortunately, in the end, jet lag overtook me, I’m sorry to say. But it’s a month-long trip, and of course, there’s Ireland on the horizon, and two old boyfriends.

“You better stock up before you go across the sea,” Andrew said, watching me gaze at Mr. Sweater. “You know how those Irish men are. Madonna/whore, madonna/whore. I can’t imagine what category you’ll fall into.”

Continue Reading Close

Page 33 of 33 in British Election