<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Broadsheet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/broadsheet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What happened to Broadsheet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/what_happened_to_broadsheet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/what_happened_to_broadsheet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2011/01/07/what_happened_to_broadsheet</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A farewell (of sorts) to Salon's feminist blog]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read about it <a href="http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/index.html?story=/about/inside_salon/2011/01/07/seitz_and_tcf">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/what_happened_to_broadsheet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/what_happened_to_broadsheet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the recession prevent teen motherhood?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/22/teen_pregnancy_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/22/teen_pregnancy_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/21/teen_pregnancy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some thank the economy for a decline in teenagers giving birth, but contraception is the likelier savior]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teen births hit a record low last year, according to a <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_03.pdf">CDC report</a> released Tuesday, and the narrative quickly taking hold in the media is that we have <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/21/AR2010122102495_pf.html">the recession to thank.</a> It's a surprising idea, that teenagers are keeping it in their pants because a baby isn't a prudent choice in the current economic environment. Foresight isn't what we expect from those creatures of impulse -- and, indeed, when <em>is</em> a baby a practical economic choice for a teen? It also struck me that the teen birth rate isn't the same as the teen pregnancy rate, if you catch my drift (my drift being ... abortion). I took my questions to a couple of experts in hopes of some clarity.</p><p>"The recession is everyone's favorite causal explanation for things happening right now," said Rachel Jones of the Guttmacher Institute. "Other than people conjecturing, there is no evidence that the recession has had a direct impact on teen sexual behaviors." What we do know, however, is that contraceptive use increased among teens between 2007 and 2009. "We don't know the reason for that increase," she explains, and, in fact, it could be the recession -- but, again, the truth is we just don't know. Her no-nonsense take: "It seems if we want to look for reasons for patterns in teen birth rates, [birth control use] is the one indicator that offers us practical insights."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/22/teen_pregnancy_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/22/teen_pregnancy_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olbermann still doesn&#8217;t get it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/keith_olbermann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/keith_olbermann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/20/keith_olbermann</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MSNBC host is back on Twitter with a response to his critics -- but he ignores their key complaint]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update:</strong> Olbermann has responded on Twitter by blocking me and <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TracyClarkFlory/status/16966187204218880">tweeting</a>, "Your article embarrasses you and your site."</p><p>Back from his self-imposed Twitter timeout, Keith Olbermann is lashing out at his feminist critics. As Sady Doyle <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/12/17/sady_doyle_olbermann_twitter/">explained last week in Salon</a>, the online protest was started in response to Michael Moore's mischaracterization of the allegations against Julian Assange. Olbermann became a target after retweeting a link from Bianca Jagger that incorrectly claimed "the term 'rape' in Sweden includes consensual sex without a condom," and that named Assange's accuser (which is generally a journalistic no-no). Overwhelmed by the Twitter campaign, which was waged with the hashtag "mooreandme," Olbermann quit the microblogging site in a huff. This afternoon, after a few days of calm reflection, he <a href="http://www.twitlonger.com/show/7js6rr">tweeted a link</a> to his thoughts on the matter:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/keith_olbermann/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/keith_olbermann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>209</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save the children from Hooters?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/hooters_kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/hooters_kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurant Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/17/hooters_kids</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOW calls on the breast-obsessed chain to stop serving kids]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Organization for Women is protesting Hooters. I know: <em>Yawn.</em> Next I'll be interrupting major sporting events with breaking news that Gloria Steinem isn't a fan of the "Girls Gone Wild" franchise. But, seriously, the argument at play here is more interesting than it at first seems. It isn't the breast-obsessed chain's existence that is being challenged, but rather the fact that Hooters serves children. Clearly, there is abundant evidence that Hooters is guilty of poor taste (see: restaurant name) -- but should the chain be forced to card customers at the door and turn away anyone younger than 18? Several California chapters of NOW have filed official complaints alleging just that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/hooters_kids/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/hooters_kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>231</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do serial killers target sex workers?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/sex_workers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/sex_workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/16/sex_workers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question is raised after four female bodies are found on a Long Island beach]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As New York <a href="http://gawker.com/5714054/looks-like-new-yorks-got-a-serial-killer">confronts the possibility</a> that there's a serial killer on the loose, many have taken note that this case looks a lot like what we see in the movies: The victims are all women, and at least one is suspected to be a sex worker. When it comes to serial murder, it turns out fiction really does reflect reality. <a href="http://www.scrippsnews.com/content/women-account-70-percent-serial-killer-victims-fbi-reports">A report</a> was released last month finding that 70 percent of known victims of serial killers are women (consider that only 22 percent of homicide victims in general are female); and it turns out sex workers are <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,234078,00.html">18 times more likely</a> than "normal" women to be murdered. Why might this be? Well, in the words of the Green River Killer, who targeted prostitutes:</p><blockquote>
<p>I picked prostitutes as victims because they were easy to pick up without being noticed. I knew they would not be reported missing right away and might never be reported missing. I picked prostitutes because I thought I could kill as many of them as I wanted without getting caught.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/sex_workers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/sex_workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The unsexiness of virtual sex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/kinect_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/kinect_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/16/kinect_sex</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A glimpse of the first pornographic video game for Microsoft's Kinect underwhelms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A preview of the first sex game for Microsoft's Kinect has hit the Web -- which is exciting! At least in theory. There's been a lot of hype around the potential for harnessing the device -- which turns the human body into a remote control -- for pornographic pursuits. However, the first glimpse of what that could mean is decidedly unsexy.</p><p>The preview shows a developer moving his hand this way and that, which causes a disembodied hand to feel up a virtual girl in the game. As <a href="http://www.gizmag.com/kinect-used-for-virtual-sex-game/17290/">some bloggers</a> <a href="http://www.techeye.net/software/first-interactive-kinect-sex-game-being-developed">have suggested</a>, it's like watching Thing from "The Addams Family" get busy -- which is rather unsettling (although, hand and amputee fetishists might disagree). This is a beta release and the preview is limited to "fondling-only mode," <a href="http://www.nerve.com/news/love-sex/watch-preview-of-the-first-ever-kinect-sex-game">according to Nerve</a>, so you can look forward to full-body interaction. Teledildonics are also likely to be introduced so that users aren't just humping air.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/kinect_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/kinect_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s new bad mom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/amber_portwood_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/amber_portwood_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teen Mom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/15/amber_portwood</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MTV's Amber Portwood has become a favorite tabloid target, thanks to assault charges and a rumored second pregnancy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britney Spears has been dethroned, ya'll. It seems the tabloids have handed the "bad mom" crown over to Amber Portwood of MTV's "Teen Mom." There's the 20-year-old on the cover of this week's In Touch alongside the all-caps headline, "She's pregnant!" Yes, she is rumored to be carrying her second child, just weeks after her first child was made a ward of the state. Also, she allegedly has no clue who the dad is. The cover teases that she's "unfazed about losing daughter Leah," has "slept with 8 guys in 2 months" and admits to being a "sex addict."</p><p>Amber isn't a stranger to negative press: She was castigated for&#160;yelling at her daughter and roughly yanking her up by the arms on the show. Then followed the <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/11/19/amber_portwood">felony domestic violence charges</a> for punching, slapping, kicking and choking the father of her daughter, and the Child Protective Services investigation.&#160;Now, British tabloids are <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1337313/Teen-Moms-Amber-Portwood-steps-new-boyfriend.html">scrutinizing the single mom's sad dating life</a> (at the same time that they're providing tips on getting her "look"). Even Perez Hilton has joined the handwringing: "While all this [is] going on, WHO IS WATCHING YOUR BABY???" The National Enquirer <a href="http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/69747">recently claimed</a> that she's also nursing a drug addiction. Radar has devotedly followed the Amber beat in recent months, <a href="http://www.radaronline.com/photos/2010/11/photos-teen-mom-star-amber-portwood-parties-with-friends-halloween-party">publishing photos of her partying</a> and <a href="http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/11/exclusive-teen-mom-amber-portwoods-daughter-confused-calls-grandmother-mom">reporting</a> that her daughter "is so confused about who her parents are she refers to her grandmother as 'mom.'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/amber_portwood_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/amber_portwood_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today in creepy stage dads</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/thora_birch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/thora_birch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/14/thora_birch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actress Thora Birch's career suffers a blow because of her father's bizarre behavior, and she isn't alone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turns out actress Thora Birch's parents were porn stars. Who knew! Her acting heritage actually includes parental performances in that 70s classic, "Deep Throat." The really crazy news here, though, is that <em>that isn't the really crazy news here</em>. The New York Times' Arts Beat <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/14/actress-thora-birch-fired-from-dracula/">reports today</a> that the 28-year-old "American Beauty" star was recently fired from the Off Broadway production of "Dracula," because of her dad. Her father-slash-manager, Jack Birch, is accused of threatening a co-star after he rubbed her back during a rehearsal scene. Patrick Healy writes:</p><blockquote>
<p>The actor -- whom none of the sides would name -- said that he had been directed to do so as part of the scene. Mr. Birch objected, saying that the back rub was unnecessary, and told the actor to stop. &#8230;When the actor tried to explain further what he was doing, Mr. Birch said, according to [director Paul] Alexander: "Listen, man, I'm trying to make this easier on you -- don't touch her."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/thora_birch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/thora_birch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Switzerland allow incest?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/swiss_incest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/swiss_incest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/13/swiss_incest</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Swiss law proposes decriminalizing consensual sexual relationships between parents and their adult children]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/12/08/rape_assange">Recent international scrutiny</a> of Sweden's rape laws certainly hasn't resulted in legislative timidity among its European neighbors: Switzerland is now considering a controversial new bill to decriminalize incest. A Justice Department spokesperson explains, "Incest continues to be a taboo in our society, but it's not up to criminal law to stop every morally reprehensible aspect of behavior. Rather, the law should be for punishing behavior that's particularly socially damaging."</p><p>Marriage between second-degree relatives (aunt/uncle, niece/nephew) is already legal in Switzerland, but the new measure would overturn the ban on consensual sexual relationships between siblings, and between parents and their adult children. (Sexual relationships with underage children would, of course, remain illegal.) The text of the bill has yet to be released, but skeeved-out opponents have heard more than enough. Barbara Schmid Federer, a member of The Christian People's Party of Switzerland, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/switzerland/8198917/Switzerland-considers-repealing-incest-laws.html">told the Telegraph</a> that the proposal was "completely repugnant" and that she "could not countenance painting out such a law from the statute books."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/swiss_incest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/swiss_incest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The law on &#8220;consensual&#8221; incest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/incest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/incest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/10/incest</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Columbia professor is charged over alleged sex with his adult daughter. An expert gives some legal background]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Epstein, a professor at Columbia University, has been arrested and charged with incest for allegedly having a consensual sexual relationship with his adult daughter. The Columbia Spectator <a href="http://www.columbiaspectator.com/2010/12/10/professor-david-epstein-charged-incest-his-daughter">reported the news</a> just this morning and it has already made international headlines. It's a testament to the strength of the incest taboo, not to mention our thirst for new twists on the classic student-teacher sex scandal. In this case, the 46-year-old political science professor isn't alleged to have had sex with one of his students but rather his 24-year-old daughter, who is in the same age bracket as most of his students. What's more, his wife is a tenured professor at the university.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/incest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/incest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adult industry&#8217;s health clinic shuttered</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/aim_shut_down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/aim_shut_down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/09/aim_shut_down</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following harsh words from an HIV-positive performer, the county closes the STD testing site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was already a bad week for the adult industry's health clinic and, impressively, it just got a lot worse. Today, Los Angeles public health officials shut down the Sherman Oaks clinic. Just <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/12/08/porn_condoms/">yesterday</a>, Derrick Burts, the porn actor at the center of the latest HIV outbreak, spoke out against Adult Industry Medical, which oversees STD testing in the business. The county says the closure has nothing to do with Burts' criticism of the operation and is instead the result of its application for a license being incomplete. So, it's an issue of shoddy paperwork (which, OK, isn't the most reassuring thing, coming from clinic that handles STD tests).</p><p>Now, county officials, who have long been at war with the industry over it's refusal to mandate condoms, are telling performers to go to county clinics instead. Public Health Director Jonathan Fielding told the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/12/aim-adult-industry-medical-healthcare-foundation-porn-industry-health-clinic-shut-down-by-la-county-.html">Los Angeles Times</a>, "All the places that we're involved with are certainly places where people can feel safe -- the privacy and confidentiality are maintained." That's of little comfort to performers like <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/07/19/lorelei_lee_stagliano_trial">Lorelei Lee</a>, who wrote me in an e-mail, "What makes me feel safe is self-determination, and being treated by health care providers who have some respect for, and understanding of, the work I do. Those were the providers found at AIM." &#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/aim_shut_down/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/aim_shut_down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rise of binge drinking women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/binge_drinking_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/binge_drinking_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/09/binge_drinking</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should we blame gender equality or booze culture?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a nation, when it comes to booze and women, we've failed. I'm not being judgey here, I&#160;mean we literally received a big fat "F" in that category on the latest women's health report card. The culprit is binge drinking:&#160;The percentage of women who have "had five or more drinks on at least one occasion during the past month" has gone from 7.3 percent in 2007 to 10.6 percent this year, according to the National Women's Law Center's annual report, <a href="http://hrc.nwlc.org/">"Making the Grade on Women&#8217;s Health."</a>&#160;</p><p>No surprise here. We've been following the rumblings over the trend of lady bingers for some time now, and the question often seems to be, as a 2008 <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/52758/">New York magazine article</a> put it: "should gender equality extend to drinking?" My answer is:&#160;yes and no. I'm more likely to order a beer and a shot of whiskey than a cosmo. I like to go against stereotypes like that. It is cocky and perhaps foolish -- but, then again, the same can be said for my male friends when it comes to drinking. I might be driven by some vaguely third-wave feminist desire to "keep up with the boys" -- but plenty of "the boys" are driven to keep up with each other, lest they appear unmanly. This is binge culture, and it isn't strictly male or female anymore. We're all full of bluster and far too much booze.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/binge_drinking_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/binge_drinking_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. rape laws, explained</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/rape_assange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/rape_assange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/08/rape_assange</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Julian Assange case sheds light on the Swedish view of sexual assault. An expert compares things stateside]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on rape charges has inspired a great deal of misinformation about sexual assault laws in the scary feminist utopia of Sweden. As Kate Harding <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/12/07/julian_assange_rape_accuser_smeared">wrote yesterday</a> in Salon, "the notion that consensual, unprotected sex equals rape in Sweden (despite millions of Swedish fathers walking around free today) continues zipping around the Internet." Thankfully, the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/08/world/europe/08sweden.html?_r=2">followed up today</a> with a fact-based report on the matter, and the results are shocking: The Swedes take rape very seriously.</p><p>The country has the highest reporting rate in the European Union. (Perhaps because "Swedish women, backed by a strong consciousness of women's rights and a history of a very public discussion of the scourge of sexual violence, may be more willing than most to look to the law for help," writes the Times' Katrin Bennhold.) Swedish law also recognizes "withdrawal of consent" as rape, which is what is alleged in the Assange case, and details three types of rape: "severe," "regular" and "less severe."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/rape_assange/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/rape_assange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HIV-positive porn actor: Mandate condoms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/porn_condoms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/porn_condoms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/08/porn_condoms</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Derrick Burts, the performer at the center of the latest industry outbreak, revives the ongoing debate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The porn star at the center of the adult industry's latest HIV outbreak is calling for mandatory condom use. Derrick Burts, formerly known only as Patient Zeta in the press, says he was infected on-set during a gay porn shoot (he's also performed in straight films). However, AIM, the industry's testing center, claims the 24-year-old "acquired the virus through private, personal activity." Burts <a href="http://www.latimes.com/health/la-me-porn-hiv-20101208,0,5306958.story">tells the Los Angeles Times</a>, "That's completely false. There is no possible way. The only person I had sex with in my personal life was my girlfriend." In fact, he says the clinic previously told him that his infection was traced to a performer who was a "known positive," but wouldn't release the patient's name. So here we have a case of he said, AIM said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/porn_condoms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/porn_condoms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The next generation of Mark Zuckerberg wannabes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/rate_your_classmates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/rate_your_classmates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Social Network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/07/rate_your_classmates</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Facebook founder's story inspires a college student to start a site for rating women on campus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next generation promises countless Mark Zuckerberg wannabes, which means all sorts of wonderful things for technical innovation. However, it seems some of his followers are specifically inspired by the <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/10/12/sorkin_responds">more misogynistic aspects</a> of the Facebook founder's legacy. Meet Justin Doody, a sophomoric (in both senses) Boston University student, who recently launched <a href="http://ratebu.com/">RateBU.com.</a> It's a site where dudes can evaluate the hotness of chicks on campus. He says his inspiration came from seeing <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/10/04/social_network_women">"The Social Network,"</a> which tells of how creating Facebook made Zuckerberg millions and (perhaps more importantly) got him lots of groupies.</p><p>Of course, the movie also explains how Facebook started as "FaceMash," a site for comparing the hotness of randomly paired students. Doody has done just that, only he's limited the rating to female students and he hasn't supplied the images of the girls himself. Instead of hacking campus servers for the eye candy a la Zuckerberg, he's asked users to post the photos themselves. Brace yourselves for the meta: The majority of the photos come from, where else, but Facebook. It's a good way to avoid legal issues, but it hasn't spared Doody any controversy. <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/campus-overload/2010/12/ratebucom_lets_students_vote_o.html">Reports</a> the Washington Post today:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/rate_your_classmates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/rate_your_classmates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prenatal pole dancing with the stars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/07/pregnant_pole_dancing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/07/pregnant_pole_dancing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/07/pregnant_pole_dancing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Funny or Die skit starring Christina Applegate pokes fun at pregnant women trying to be sexy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pregnant Christina Applegate has demonstrated her dedication to her craft by strapping on some stripper heels and swinging around a pole -- all for comedic effect. In a new skit for Funny or Die, the 39-year-old actress poses as Roxy Fedaro, a dance instructor selling an instructional prenatal pole dancing DVD.&#160;Watch as she struggles to touch her toes and falls off the pole -- ha-hah! Silly pregnant lady trying to be sexy. There are also jokes about farting and hemorrhoids. It's a reminder that while we like seeing <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/11/10/miranda_kerr">pregnant celebrities naked</a>, we aren't ready for them to act sexy (unless, of course, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_fetishism">that's your thing</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/07/pregnant_pole_dancing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/07/pregnant_pole_dancing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ballet&#8217;s big fat body issues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/07/ballet_weight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/07/ballet_weight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/06/ballet_weight</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alastair Macaulay's recent New York Times review created a stir. An expert explains why he was wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may not approach <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/12/02/black_swan">the drama of "Black Swan,"</a> but it is nonetheless an intriguing ballet scandal. Last week, in a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/arts/dance/29nutcracker.html">New York Times</a> review of "George Balanchine's The Nutcracker," respected ballet critic Alastair Macaulay made surprising remarks about the dancers' weight. He wrote:</p><blockquote>
<p>Jenifer Ringer, as the Sugar Plum Fairy, looked as if she'd eaten one sugar plum too many; and Jared Angle, as the Cavalier, seems to have been sampling half the Sweet realm.</p>
</blockquote><p>Well then. Given the history of anorexia and bulimia in ballet -- and that Ringer herself has spoken openly about struggling with disordered eating -- it's no surprise that his comments <a href="http://jezebel.com/5707457/fat+ballerinsa-critic-tries-to-elaborate-fails">stirred up outrage.</a> The reader revolt was significant enough to inspire <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/04/arts/dance/04ballet.html">a self-defense in the Times</a> this weekend. Macaulay's argument, essentially:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/07/ballet_weight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/07/ballet_weight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women don&#8217;t trust Palin on abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/06/palin_abortion_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/06/palin_abortion_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/06/palin_abortion</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll shows that when it comes to reproductive rights, sanity prevails (well, mostly)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a while, I am pleasantly reminded that Americans are smarter than they seem. This morning brought one such bright moment via a survey finding that women don't trust Sarah Palin when it comes to women's health issues. The poll asked female voters whom they trust more to represent their views on&#160;abortion, birth control and sex education: Palin or Planned Parenthood. Her tea partying, "Dancing With the Stars"-watching "mama grizzlies" couldn't save her on this one: The result was 22 percent and 58 percent, respectively. More generally, the survey, which was conducted for Planned Parenthood by a political polling firm, found that 43 percent of male and female voters polled said Palin was "out of step" with their views on reproductive rights.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/06/palin_abortion_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/06/palin_abortion_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The panic over &#8220;child porn&#8221; Barbie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/video_barbie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/video_barbie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/03/video_barbie</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FBI says the video-ready doll could be used by predators -- but a former agent tells Salon the threat is minor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.kirotv.com/download/2010/1203/26002868.pdf">internal FBI alert</a> about the new "Video Girl" Barbie has leaked, sparking a frenzy of speculation today about how the toy could be used by pedophiles. Cue the quotes from <a href="http://www.fox40.com/news/headlines/ktxl-news-videogirlbarbie,0,5665324.story">horrified parents</a> <a href="http://www.king5.com/news/consumer/Barbie-doll-prompts-FBI-alert-to-police-111231799.html">and relatives</a> who are boycotting the in-demand doll this holiday season, all in the name of protecting children from would-be pornographers (never mind that the worry is pedophiles will buy the toy themselves). But, a former FBI agent who specializes in child sex crimes, tells Salon that the danger has been overhyped. You can blame Barbie for many things -- glorifying an impossible waist-to-hip ratio, say -- but child pornography is not one of them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/video_barbie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/video_barbie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The flaws of &#8220;rape by fraud&#8221; law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/rape_by_fraud_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/rape_by_fraud_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/12/03/rape_by_fraud</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idaho limits the charge to spouses -- but that might change soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Idaho, if a man gets a woman to have sex with him by impersonating her husband, it's considered "rape by fraud." (It's a strange scenario, but it happens: Maybe the room is especially dark, or she is especially intoxicated.) But if that woman is unmarried and the man instead poses as her boyfriend to get her to submit to sex, it isn't rape under current state law. All that could change, though, thanks to a recent case that exposed this legal flaw, the <a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/politics/congress/2010/12/idaho-rape-fraud-law-covers-only-married-women">Associated Press</a> reports.</p><p>Last month, a judge dismissed rape charges in a case where a woman was allegedly tricked by her boyfriend into having sex with a stranger. If her boyfriend had instead been her husband, the case could have gone forward, no problem. But the statute specifically limits the charge to cases where a woman "submits under the belief that the person committing the act is her husband, and the belief is induced by artifice, pretense or concealment practiced by the accused, with intent to induce such belief."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/rape_by_fraud_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/rape_by_fraud_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

