<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>6 insidious ways you&#8217;re getting ripped off</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And how to fight back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a><strong>I</strong>n the wake of the financial crisis, there was a moment<strong></strong>of hope that predatory businesses would no longer be able to pick at our bones like vultures. Instead, we've seen Dodd-Frank weakened and stalled, and the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau stymied at every turn. In the latest round, Republicans are thwarting the confirmation of Richard Cordray to lead the Bureau. Meanwhile, we continue to get fleeced. Here are a few egregious scams to watch out for, along with ways to protect yourself.</p><p><strong>1. Auto-renewal scams</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fracking ourselves to death in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/fracking_ourselves_to_death_in_pennsylvania_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/fracking_ourselves_to_death_in_pennsylvania_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Dispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the "downwinders," big energy means big pollution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 70 years ago, a chemical attack was launched against Washington State and Nevada. It poisoned people, animals, everything that grew, breathed air, and drank water. The Marshall Islands were also struck. This formerly pristine Pacific atoll was branded “the most contaminated place in the world.” As their cancers developed, the victims of atomic testing and nuclear weapons development got a name: downwinders. What marked their tragedy was the darkness in which they were kept about what was being done to them. Proof of harm fell to them, not to the U.S. government agencies responsible.</p><p>Now, a new generation of downwinders is getting sick as an emerging  industry pushes the next wonder technology -- in this case, high-volume hydraulic fracturing. Whether they live in Texas, Colorado, or Pennsylvania, their symptoms are the same: rashes, nosebleeds, severe headaches, difficulty breathing, joint pain, intestinal illnesses, memory loss, and more. “In my opinion,” says Yuri Gorby of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, “what we see unfolding is a serious health crisis, one that is just beginning.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/fracking_ourselves_to_death_in_pennsylvania_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/fracking_ourselves_to_death_in_pennsylvania_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alex Jones: Conspiracy Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/alex_jones_conspiracy_inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/alex_jones_conspiracy_inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conspiracy theories can be big business. Here's how the multi-platform entrepreneur makes his millions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">It’s good to be Alex Jones. Matt Drudge, the conservative Web entrepreneur and news aggregator, proved prophetic when he predicted that 2013 would be “<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/04/23/matt-drudge-promises-year-of-alex-jones/193748">the year of Alex Jones</a>.” The longtime conspiracy broadcaster is finally breaking into the mainstream consciousness after a buzzy interview with Piers Morgan and his Boston bombing conspiracy, and traffic to his websites has <a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/infowars.com">never been higher</a>. The conspiracy business is booming.</p><p dir="ltr">And make no mistake, it is a business. That’s not to say that Jones isn’t a believer -- there are easier ways to make money -- but Jones has built a multi-platform new media empire in his Austin, Texas, Free Speech Systems LLC that reaches millions of believers and <a href="http://static.infowars.com/ads/mediakit_public.pdf">promises</a> advertisers that it will “direct lucrative buyers to you from our daily audience of active enthusiasts.” And all told, Jones is very likely raking in millions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/alex_jones_conspiracy_inc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/alex_jones_conspiracy_inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of the dollar menu?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/fast_food_chains_might_do_away_with_dollar_menus_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/fast_food_chains_might_do_away_with_dollar_menus_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burger kind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Value meals aren't just bad for your cholesterol, they're taking a toll on their franchises' bottom lines   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>“Value menus” increasingly seem a bad physical deal for consumers—and now perhaps a bum fiscal deal for fast-food purveyors. The cheap chow, long a target for nutrition-focused researchers and  locavoring  advocates, has been criticized for all manner of bad outcomes, mostly <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/04/23/the-economics-of-eating.html" target="_blank">centered on obesity</a>. <a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;aid=8820430" target="_blank">Fast food in general is assailed</a> by these same sources, of course—the book is <em>Fast Food Nation</em>, after all, and not <em>Dollar Menu Dominion</em>—but value menus (and their late cousin “supersize”) are seen as particularly egregious in making fat-laden crappy food—despite all the <a href="http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&amp;handle=hein.journals/lyclr23&amp;div=27&amp;id=&amp;page=" target="_blank">menu labeling</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0061081" target="_blank">soda shrinking</a>, <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/oby.2004.64/full" target="_blank">portion bashing</a>, and <a href="http://www.psmag.com/health/big-soda-the-usda-and-school-food-4692/" target="_blank">bad mouthing</a> in the world— irresistibly cheap.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/fast_food_chains_might_do_away_with_dollar_menus_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/fast_food_chains_might_do_away_with_dollar_menus_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eden Foods doubles down in birth control flap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After my report on soy company's anti-birth control agenda, its CEO calls to talk Obama, abortion and contraception]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I've got more interest in good quality long underwear than I have in birth control pills," the unfamiliar voice on the phone said to me.</p><p>It was Michael Potter, the Eden Foods founder and CEO. He was calling to respond to my Salon report from last week, which revealed that his organic food company -- which markets itself to a crunchy, liberal crowd -- was quietly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/">suing the Obama administration</a> over its requirement that his company's employee health plan cover birth control. Mostly, he said in the most amiable, avowedly Midwestern way imaginable -- at one point he called himself "a pretty simple guy, a Midwestern homemade-soup guy" -- he was calling to apologize to me.</p><p>It wasn't that he was upset about my <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/">reporting</a> or what his company was doing. He was just sorry my request for comment had gone unanswered due to an oversight. I accepted the apology, and asked why he said he didn't care about birth control, since he filed a suit about it and all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>206</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon sells out its small retailers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/amazons_failure_to_deliver_orders_on_time_hurts_small_retailers_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/amazons_failure_to_deliver_orders_on_time_hurts_small_retailers_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Merchants who hawk their wares on Amazon say their businesses suffer when the company makes empty delivery promises]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/">Amazon</a> is used to facing harsh criticism. In fact, for many irate customers who didn’t receive their orders on time — especially around the holidays — going online to vent about the company's broken delivery promises almost seems like a pastime.</p><p><a href="http://www.dailydot.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/dailydot_square-e1364842032669.png" alt="The Daily Dot" align="left" /></a></p><p dir="ltr">Take Connie V., an Amazon customer who claims on consumer complaints forum <a href="http://www.planetfeedback.com/amazoncom+inc/delivery/amazon+delivery+not+made+when+promised/323156">Planetfeedback</a> that, despite paying extra for expedited delivery to ensure a Dec. 22 arrival date, her purchases did not come until the day after Christmas.</p><p dir="ltr">"My gifts didn't arrive until December 26th, which made my child question why Santa didn't bring them in his sled," she wrote. "I wrote two complaints to the Amazon site and never even received a reply."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/amazons_failure_to_deliver_orders_on_time_hurts_small_retailers_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/amazons_failure_to_deliver_orders_on_time_hurts_small_retailers_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William Shakespeare: Legendary playwright and exploitative businessman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/william_shakespeare_legendary_playwright_and_exploitative_businessman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/william_shakespeare_legendary_playwright_and_exploitative_businessman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playwright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study asserts that the playwright evaded taxes for years and faced jail time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is such a thing as a big scandal in the literary community, this may be it: New academic research has found that William Shakespeare was a cut-throat businessman who often engaged in illegal activities at the expense of the very community he represented in his plays. </p><p>From the <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2301829/Was-Shakespeare-tax-dodger-Bard-ruthless-businessman-exploited-famine-faced-jail-cheating-revenue.html">Daily Mail</a>:</p><blockquote><p>William Shakespeare was threatened with prison for dodging tax and illegally hoarded food to sell on at inflated prices, new research has revealed.</p> <p>An academic study looking into Shakespeare's 'other life' as one of Warwickshire's biggest landowners has uncovered a less than savoury side to Britain's greatest playwright.</p> <p>The allegation he exploited famine has also lead to suggestions that his 'Coriolanus,' for years regarded as a plea for the starving poor, was in fact his way of trying to expunge a guilty conscience. </p></blockquote><p>The paper, written by Jayne Archer, a researcher in Renaissance literature at Aberystwyth University, Richard Marggraf Turley, a professor in the department and Howard Thomas, a professor of plant science found that by "combining both illegal and legal activities, Shakespeare was able to retire in 1613 as the largest property owner in his home town." </p><p>"His profits — minus a few fines for illegal hoarding and tax evasion — meant he had a working life of just 24 years."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/william_shakespeare_legendary_playwright_and_exploitative_businessman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/william_shakespeare_legendary_playwright_and_exploitative_businessman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaning in won&#8217;t help your career</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/leaning_in_wont_help_your_career_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/leaning_in_wont_help_your_career_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Sandberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marissa Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13230022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want a better job, unionize]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg didn’t say “join a union.” But that’s the message the vast majority of working women should be considering this Women’s History Month. The best way for the most women to improve their working lives is through a union.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>The new PBS documentary <a href="http://www.makers.com/"><em>Makers: Women Who Make America</em></a> shows how the women's movement changed the workplace for women, men and families. Two of the young <em>Makers</em> highlighted in the film, Sheryl Sandberg at Facebook and Marissa Mayer at Yahoo, now dominate the news. Here's what neither of them tell you: union women earn more than non-union women and have better benefits and working conditions.</p><p>Women at Facebook and Yahoo should consider spending their time organizing to have a say in their workplace.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/leaning_in_wont_help_your_career_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/leaning_in_wont_help_your_career_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Veronica Mars&#8221; Kickstarts a movie project</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/the_captialist_veronica_mars_movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/the_captialist_veronica_mars_movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veronica Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kickstarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Bros.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hobbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristen bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rob thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Veronica Mars" fans invest in a movie that Warner Bros. stands to profit from — and that's just fine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this morning, Rob Thomas, the creator of “Veronica Mars,” the sharpest, prickliest drama about a teen detective that ever was, announced that he was trying to raise at least $2 million <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/559914737/the-veronica-mars-movie-project">for a “Veronica Mars” movie on Kickstarter</a>. The beloved series was canceled after three seasons in 2007, and Thomas and the star Kristen Bell have been talking about making a movie on and off ever since. If the Kickstarter campaign is successful, a “Veronica Mars” movie will be filmed this summer. As of this writing, so just four or so hours since the project was announced, the project has already raised $1,100,000. There is going to be a “Veronica Mars” movie.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/the_captialist_veronica_mars_movie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/the_captialist_veronica_mars_movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many book sales equal an Amazon bestseller?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/how_many_book_sales_equals_an_amazon_bestseller/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/how_many_book_sales_equals_an_amazon_bestseller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publisher's Weekly says it may not be that many]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon sales figures are among the best kept, and most sought after, secrets in the publishing industry. The list updates hourly but Amazon, the biggest book retailer in the country, refuses to share data on what level of sales correspond to a coveted spot at the top of the list. (The New York Times' bestseller list, still arguably the most influential in the country, is also <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/1813678/what-being-bestselling-author-really-means">cagey with its metrics</a>.)</p><p>In an <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/bookselling/article/56284-how-many-copies-does-it-take-to-be-an-amazon-bestseller.html">article today</a>, Publishers Weekly tried to reverse engineer a book's sales on Amazon by tracking its position on the bestseller list. The conclusion, which is couched in plenty of caveats, is that reaching the top of the Amazon list only requires about 300 sales through the site per day. It's not a result that will cheer the always beleaguered publishing industry.</p><p>Here's how the experiment worked:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/how_many_book_sales_equals_an_amazon_bestseller/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/how_many_book_sales_equals_an_amazon_bestseller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US adds 236,000 jobs, unemployment falls to 7.7 percent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/us_adds_236k_jobs_unemployment_falls_to_7_7_pct_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/us_adds_236k_jobs_unemployment_falls_to_7_7_pct_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13222837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unemployment rate is at its lowest level in four years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. employers ramped up hiring in February, adding 236,000 jobs and pushing the unemployment rate down to 7.7 percent from 7.9 percent in January. Stronger hiring shows businesses are confident about the economy, despite higher taxes and government spending cuts.</p><p>The government's February employment report was filled with mostly encouraging details. The unemployment rate is now at its lowest level in four years. Hiring has averaged more than 200,000 per month since November. Wages increased. And the job gains were broad-based, led by the best construction hiring in six years.</p><p>One negative detail: employers added fewer jobs in January than first estimated. Job gains were lowered to 119,000 from an initially reported 157,000. Still, December hiring was a little better than first thought, with 219,000 jobs added instead of 196,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/us_adds_236k_jobs_unemployment_falls_to_7_7_pct_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/us_adds_236k_jobs_unemployment_falls_to_7_7_pct_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Trump&#8217;s birtherism stain &#8220;Apprentice&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/donald_trump_talks_to_salon_about_apprentice_ratings_his_2012_presidential_flirtation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/donald_trump_talks_to_salon_about_apprentice_ratings_his_2012_presidential_flirtation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the apprentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all-star celebrity apprentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dateline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The show's ratings dip, but The Donald says no. "There are a lot of people out there who agree with me!"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump's "All-Star Celebrity Apprentice," the spring reality show uniting past contestants like Dennis Rodman, Gary Busey and La Toya Jackson, won its second hour last night among adults aged 18-49. But overall the news was mixed: Viewership was down from previous "Celebrity Apprentice" debuts, to <a href="http://insidetv.ew.com/2013/03/04/red-widow-stung-by-premiere-ratings/">5.1 million people</a> over the two-hour season premiere. (<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/20/idUS197400636320120220">Last year's premiere</a> got 7.4 million viewers; in 2011, that number was <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/clean-weekly-sweep-fox-126691">7.93 million</a>.)</p><p>"We're very happy with the 10 o'clock hour," Trump told Salon in an interview on Monday. "And after four episodes, it goes to 10 o'clock. So it's really the 10 o'clock hour."</p><p>"We beat everybody. We beat every other network," Trump said. "That's our hour. We serve as our own lead-in." (Last night on NBC, the first hour of "Apprentice" followed the newsmagazine "Dateline.")</p><p>Trump refused to brook questioning as to whether NBC -- which has collapsed in the ratings so far in 2013, slipping to fifth place after Univision in the February sweeps -- might not be the ideal home for a TV show.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/donald_trump_talks_to_salon_about_apprentice_ratings_his_2012_presidential_flirtation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/donald_trump_talks_to_salon_about_apprentice_ratings_his_2012_presidential_flirtation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read our salon on fracking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two experts pulled apart the issue -- and each other’s arguments -- in real time. Read the debate here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The growing tension between environmental concerns and business interests intensified this weekend amid <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ap-ny-fracking-held-cuomo-rfk-jr-talk-18636918">reports</a> that New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo was ready to approve a plan to allow hydraulic fracturing (aka "hydrofracking" or "fracking") in parts of his state, until a last-minute intervention from Robert Kennedy Jr. put the plan on delay as it undergoes further study. As politicians at all levels (including <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/feb/16/fracking-obama-climate-change-goals">the president</a>) will be deciding whether to embrace the controversial method of shale gas drilling in coming months, we asked two experts with divergent views to discuss the issue with us -- and you.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the Internet kill &#8220;Girls Gone Wild&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/did_the_internet_kill_girls_gone_wild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/did_the_internet_kill_girls_gone_wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[girls gone wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe francis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring breakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13216140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Joe Francis empire faces bankruptcy, marking the end of an era. But don't worry, you can still see naked ladies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the world is tired of sloppy drunk chicks taking off their tops for trucker hats, it is tired of itself. World, we must be damn weary. The Joe Francis "Girls Gone Wild" empire has filed for bankruptcy protection.</p><p>I'm sure you're absolutely heartbroken over what will happen to the man who's made a living finding young women whose judgment is deeply impaired and coercing them into acts that range from a flash of boobies to reportedly <a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/la-tm-gonewild32aug06,0,6367343.story">losing their virginity to him.</a> Across the nation, women everywhere are so sad, they're leaving their shirts on and can't even muster a single, forlorn "<em>whooooooo</em>."</p><p>There was a time, just a few years ago, when Francis seemed to have the Midas touch, a moment when everything in his path turned into nipples and girl-on-girl makeout sessions. Francis was said to have been worth $150 million, and his future looked like it would continue to be more of the same. After all, what's a more reliable moneymaker than youth and poor decision-making?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/did_the_internet_kill_girls_gone_wild/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/did_the_internet_kill_girls_gone_wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is kitty litter in your cigarette</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/there_is_kitty_litter_in_your_cigarette/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/there_is_kitty_litter_in_your_cigarette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And it's helping tobacco companies avoid up to $1.1 billion in taxes ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A dozen tobacco companies have avoided as much as $1.1 billion in taxes by using fillers (like the clay found in cat litter) to make their cigarettes heavier, exempting them from a 2,653 percent increase in a federal excise tax on non-"large cigar" tobacco products.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-01/tobacco-firms-save-1-billion-with-kitty-litter-in-cigars.html" target="_blank">reported</a> by Bloomberg News, current rules "require a rolled tobacco product to weigh at least 3 pounds per 1,000 to be labeled as a 'large' or 'premium' cigar, a category where taxes increased just 155 percent."</p><p>The practice of weighting tobacco products has contributed to a 100 percent increase in sales of the filler-laced products, and a <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6130a1.htm" target="_blank">report</a> from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention blames the “tax disparities between product types” for increased adult consumption of pipe tobacco and cigarette-like cigars. While cigarette smoking has been on the decline for more than a decade, "large cigar" smoking, including the filler-laced cigarettes, tripled in the same time period.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/there_is_kitty_litter_in_your_cigarette/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/there_is_kitty_litter_in_your_cigarette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifty shades of &#8230; beige?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/fifty_shades_of_beige/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/fifty_shades_of_beige/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50 Shades of Grey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifty Shades of Grey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.L. James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[el james]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fan Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fan fic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sadomasochism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E.L. James says she's got a new book in the works — and she's toning down the raunch. Will readers bite?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Vanity Fair's famous Oscar party Sunday night, the New York Post was eager to find out from <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/fifty_shades_meets_oscars_aFK71gavl6fG60yvouYs2J">Fifty Shades of Grey”</a> author E .L. James — the writer now famous for her "Twilight" fan-fic bodice whipper, I mean, ripper  —  who is being cast in the film adaptation of her internationally best-selling BDSM romance series. She told them, "We don’t even have a filmmaker … so we are still a long way away from casting. I have some ideas  … but it may not be who people expect.” She also told the Post that she's toning down the sex for her next book. "It won’t be nearly so raunchy — and I will probably write it under another name,” she said. The trilogy, the first novel of which was initially self-published as an e-book titled "Master of the Universe," and later repackaged as both an e-book and a trade paperback as "Fifty Shades of Grey" by Vintage Books, has sold over 65 million copies around the world, in over 37 countries, and was <a title="" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/dec/26/fifty-shades-grey-most-popular-book">chosen book of the year by the public</a> in the National Book Awards back in December.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/fifty_shades_of_beige/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/fifty_shades_of_beige/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marissa Mayer, morale killer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/marissa_mayer_morale_killer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/marissa_mayer_morale_killer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marissa Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Yahoo CEO tells her employees: Stop telecommuting, or get out. But is working from home really better?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When All Things D's <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20130222/physically-together-heres-the-internal-yahoo-no-work-from-home-memo-which-extends-beyond-remote-workers/">Kara Swisher reported Monday</a> that Yahoo CEO and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/marissa_mayer_can_work_if_she_wants/ ">reluctant metaphor for working motherhood</a> Marissa Mayer's brave new vision for her organization now involves telling several hundred workers they can either stop working from home or get the hell out, a nation of hardworking, life-career-juggling telecommuters winced in sympathy. As <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/free_your_workers_yahoo/">our own Irin Carmon put it</a>, "Yahoo is setting back … progress and flexibility" in a move whose "impact falls disproportionately on women." A Yahoo employee, meanwhile, told Swisher it was "outrageous and a morale killer."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/marissa_mayer_morale_killer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/marissa_mayer_morale_killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many more bailouts will we allow?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/its_time_to_break_up_the_banks_once_and_for_all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/its_time_to_break_up_the_banks_once_and_for_all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Weill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13165111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The banks are now far bigger than they were prior to the recession. It's time to break them up once and for all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TARP – the infamous Troubled Assets Relief Program that bailed out Wall Street in 2008 – is over. The Treasury Department <a href="http://robertreich.org/post/%5Bhttp://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-banks-tarp-bailout-treasury-20121218,0,3996581.story%5D">announced</a> it will be completing the sale of the remaining shares it owns of the banks and of General Motors.</p><p>But in reality it’s not over. The biggest Wall Street banks are now <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-16/obama-bid-to-end-too-big-to-fail-undercut-as-banks-grow.html">far bigger</a> than they were four years ago when they were considered too big to fail. The five largest have almost 44 percent of all US bank deposits.</p><p>That’s up from 37 percent in 2007, just before the crash. A decade ago they had just 28 percent.</p><p>The biggest banks keep getting bigger because they can borrow more cheaply than smaller banks. That’s because investors believe the government will bail them out if they get into trouble, rather than force them into a form of bankruptcy (as the new Dodd-Frank law makes possible).</p><p>That’s why it’s necessary to limit their size and break up the biggest.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/its_time_to_break_up_the_banks_once_and_for_all/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/its_time_to_break_up_the_banks_once_and_for_all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overweight-only gym helps members relate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/overweight_only_gym_helps_members_relate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/overweight_only_gym_helps_members_relate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fitness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weight Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13163461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A trendy gym with one catch: You must be 50 pounds or more overweight to join ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DALLAS (AP) — Downsize Fitness is an exclusive health club, evocative of the nation's trendiest gyms. But there's a strict requirement to join: You must be 50 pounds or more overweight.</p><p>The chain wants its members to feel comfortable while exercising, so there are no mirrors inside and the windows are fogged. Even the equipment is designed for heavier people.</p><p>Chicago entrepreneur Francis Wisnewski says he started the gym because "I've been overweight my whole life, and I was embarrassed to go to the gym myself."</p><p>The first locations opened in Chicago and Las Vegas in 2011, and expanded to Dallas in 2012.</p><p>Gym member Janie Busch said she likes the supportive atmosphere.</p><p>Krisanne Hale, a personal trainer in Dallas, is still trying to lose weight. She says that helps members relate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/overweight_only_gym_helps_members_relate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/overweight_only_gym_helps_members_relate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why not mint a trillion-dollar platinum coin?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/why_not_mint_a_trillion_dollar_platinum_coin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/why_not_mint_a_trillion_dollar_platinum_coin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mint the Coin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Platinum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13162788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may be silly, but the idea of lurching from one manufactured economic crisis to the next is a lot sillier ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> It's bizarre how people distinguish between serious and unserious proposals.</p><p>With another debt-ceiling show-down looming, talk of the 'platinum coin option' – declared deeply unserious in 2011 – is once again gaining some traction. Here's<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-03/why-we-must-go-off-the-platinum-coin-cliff.html">Josh Barro over at Bloomberg</a>:</p><p>I'm glad to see Representative Jerrold Nadler <a href="http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/politics/2013/01/7052758/looking-next-debt-ceiling-fight-nadler-proposes-trillion-dollar-coi">lending his support</a> to the idea that President<a href="http://topics.bloomberg.com/barack-obama/">Barack Obama</a> should avert a debt-limit crisis by issuing large-denomination platinum coins, as permitted by 31 USC § 5112.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/why_not_mint_a_trillion_dollar_platinum_coin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/why_not_mint_a_trillion_dollar_platinum_coin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>