<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Businessweek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/businessweek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Businessweek pulls &#8220;attractive female students&#8221; poll after backlash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After facing overwhelmingly negative reactions, the publication pulled the poll, saying it was "in poor taste"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday, Nov. 9, Businessweek asked its Twitter followers to vote on "Which business school has the most attractive female students." Predictably, readers found the tweet and the poll it linked to <a href="http://topsy.com/www.businessweek.com/face-off/2012-11-09/which-business-school-has-the-most-attractive-female-students">offensive</a>. Writer Shelby Knox <a href="https://twitter.com/shelbyknox/status/267107652776099840">replied with sarcasm</a>: "Do women go to B-School to run companies, be on boards? Hell no! For the pleasure of male students," while Jamil Smith <a href="https://twitter.com/jamilsmith/status/267281576268812288">admonished</a> Businessweek, writing, "You'd think <a href="http://topsy.com/twitter/bw">@BW</a> would be above chauvinist crap like this, or should want to be."</p><p>But, as Daily Dot's Aja Romano points out, this is not the first year that Businessweek has issued polls <a href="http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110907/fifty-colleges-with-the-hottest-guys-girls-and-nightlife#slide2">rating the attractiveness</a> of students:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The choice between automatons and leaders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/the_choice_between_automatons_and_leaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/the_choice_between_automatons_and_leaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Businessweek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a little-noticed remark, a Wall Streeter admits that execs fear elected officials who have inconvenient morals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask corporate executives what they really want in a legislator, and they probably won’t use words like “principled” or “well-informed.” If the cocktails are appropriately strong and inhibitions are consequently reduced, executives will likely tell you in a moment of candor that the best politician, from their perspective, is the one who is incurious and who possesses very little policy expertise. They don’t want people with inconvenient morals, ethics or brains getting in their way. They want the equivalent of T-1000s from the "Terminator" films: unthinking, fully programmable cyborgs willing and able to shape-shift in order to carry out a mission.</p><p>Alas, it is rare to get such an admission in public, and it is even more rare to get said admission in the pages of a major publication. That’s why Businessweek’s recent examination of the country’s marquee U.S. Senate race is so significant. In looking at the Massachusetts matchup between Republican incumbent Scott Brown and Democratic nominee Elizabeth Warren, the magazine quotes Brown fundraiser Lawrence McDonald, a former Lehman trader, acknowledging that he and his Wall Street friends hate the idea of an independently informed legislator who might bring her own wisdom to Washington.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/the_choice_between_automatons_and_leaders/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/the_choice_between_automatons_and_leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
