<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s college mess</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/californias_college_mess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/californias_college_mess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12883171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How not to compete in the global economy: The richest state in the U.S. can't afford to educate its students]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If increasing access to quality higher education is as crucial to U.S. economic growth as everybody seems to think it is, then two news item from California this week deliver a simple, straightforward message: We're screwed.</p><p>1) Ace education reporter Nanette Asimov reported on Tuesday in the San Francisco Chronicle that the California State University system is <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2012%2F04%2F13%2FMNDI1O32PO.DTL">withholding</a> around $90 million in cash grants previously allocated to graduate students in the CSU system.</p><blockquote><p>Graduate students across the 23-campus system began receiving financial aid notices this week and were astonished to see that the State University Grant that takes care of tuition for low-income students was missing. In its place was the offer of a federal loan at 6.8 percent interest.</p></blockquote><p>2) Also on Tuesday, University of California officials announced a sharp increase in <a href="http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/education/uc-reports-jump-out-state-student-admissions/nMbfc/">out-of-state student admissions</a> to the U.C. system:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/californias_college_mess/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/californias_college_mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s unregulated fracking problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/californias_unregulated_fracking_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/californias_unregulated_fracking_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12814961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drilling has long gone unregulated in this earthquake-prone state. And now Gov. Brown may be trying to hush it up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the smoking gun of Josh Fox's sobering documentary "Gasland," hydraulic fracturing has finally entered our renewable news cycle. Yet despite poisoning groundwater, freeing methane and literally creating earthquakes back east, fracking has a visibility problem in California.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>The situation became less clear after a recent investigative report from D.C.-based nonprofit Environmental Working Group explained that <a href="http://static.ewg.org/reports/2012/fracking/ca_fracking/ca_regulators_see_no_fracking.pdf">California has experienced 60 unregulated years of widespread fracking</a>, whose technical methods and geographical locations in the seismically active state exist outside of the public purview. It got darker after Gov. Jerry Brown's administration wiped the state government's Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (<a href="http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/Pages/Index.aspx">DOGGR</a>) website of fracking fact-sheets and documents. Good luck finding anything about fracking on the <a href="http://gov.ca.gov/home.php">governor's official site</a> either.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/californias_unregulated_fracking_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/californias_unregulated_fracking_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swimming with the stars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/swimming_with_the_stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/swimming_with_the_stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Five-Minute Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12262681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new photography exhibition examines the cultural significance of the Southern California swimming pool]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By turns playful, suggestive and bewitching, the photographs in a new show at the Palm Springs Art Museum propel us back through the decades, to a time when the glamour of choreographed capitalist displays had a singular hold over the American imagination.</p><p>These images, though diverse in many respects, all have one thing in common: the swimming pool. That, and their mid-to-late 20th-century Southern California backdrop.</p><p>The exhibition is part of  <a href="http://www.pacificstandardtime.org/">"Pacific Standard Time,"</a> a multi-institutional project devoted telling the story "of the birth of the Los Angeles art scene and how it became a major new force in the art world," sponsored by the Getty Research Institute. Over the phone, curator Daniell Cornell explained the place of the swimming pool in Southern California's cultural history, and discussed the show's principal themes -- from architecture and suburban idealism to the cult of the Hollywood celebrity. Click through the following slide show for a sun-soaked trip back in time.</p><p><strong>Had you considered doing a swimming-pool themed photography exhibition before "Pacific Standard Time"?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/swimming_with_the_stars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/swimming_with_the_stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Southern California</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/occupy_southern_california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/occupy_southern_california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10123094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least a half-dozen separate protest movements have sprung up between L.A. and San Diego]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California has long been a hotbed of political activism, so it's no real surprise that residents across the state are expressing their solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street movement. In fact, in the relatively small tract of land between Los Angeles and San Diego, a number of groups have staged protests of their own. Here's a roundup:</p><p><strong>Occupy Los Angeles: </strong>A group of <a href="http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2011/10/16/occupy-la-movement-grows-stronger-louder/">10,000 to 15,000 protesters</a> -- not just Angelenos, but Californians from near and far -- marched in dowtown L.A. on Saturday. According to the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-economy-protest-20111016,0,1832793.story">Los Angeles Times</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Despite the frustration and anger that many protesters expressed, the march took on a decidedly festive atmosphere. Families walked together, with mothers carrying babes in Snuggies and tattooed fathers toting toddlers on their shoulders. One woman twirled a Hula-Hoop around her middle as she walked. A man strummed a guitar. Several people pounded drums.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/occupy_southern_california/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/occupy_southern_california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s crackdown on medical marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10112784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Justice Department shifts course and goes after California's lucrative pot industry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in July, I <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana/singleton">interviewed</a> a drug policy expert about an apparent change in Justice Department policy that suggested a crackdown on medical marijuana -- which is legal in many states but illegal under federal law -- might be coming.</p><p>Now, with the <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/crime/archives/2011/10/us-attorneys-marijuana-dispensaries-in-california-arent-legal.html">announcement</a> last week by California's four U.S. attorneys that pot dispensaries will be targeted with harsh criminal sanctions, the shift feared by drug policy reform advocates appears to have come to pass. The <a href="http://granitestaters.com/candidates/barack_obama.html">rhetoric</a> from candidate Barack Obama about not prioritizing medical marijuana cases now seems a distant memory.</p><p>To learn more about what's happening in California, I spoke to Bob Egelko, a veteran reporter who covers courts for the San Francisco Chronicle and has been following the story.</p><p><strong>Starting with the basics, what is the medical marijuana law in California and what does it allow for?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: By the shores of California&#8217;s dead sea</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/pick_of_the_week_by_the_shores_of_californias_dead_sea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/pick_of_the_week_by_the_shores_of_californias_dead_sea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salton Sea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10112500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: Docu-musical hybrid \"Bombay Beach\" captures life on the bottom rung of the American dream]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody that's ever seen the <a href="en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salton_Sea">Salton Sea</a> understands why writers, artists and filmmakers of a certain disposition are drawn to the place. A landlocked, increasingly saline inland sea in the Southern California desert, three hours or so east of Los Angeles, the Salton was created by accident early in the 20th century, when the Colorado River burst its canal gates. It's one of the world's largest inland seas located at one of the lowest points on the planet (more than 200 feet below sea level), and while it enjoyed a brief development boom in the years after World War II, today it presents a vision of almost unparalleled decrepitude and isolation, a post-apocalyptic landscape worthy of the late science-fiction pioneer J.G. Ballard. (By pure coincidence, reporter Evelyn Nieves visited the Salton Sea's shores for a <a href="http://life.salon.com/2011/10/11/saturday_night_in_slab_city/">Salon cover story</a> published earlier this week.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/pick_of_the_week_by_the_shores_of_californias_dead_sea/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/pick_of_the_week_by_the_shores_of_californias_dead_sea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: Calif. can&#8217;t ban violent video game sales</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/us_supreme_court_violent_video_games/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/us_supreme_court_violent_video_games/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2011/06/27/us_supreme_court_violent_video_games</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court says governments do not have the power to "restrict the ideas to which children may be exposed"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court on Monday refused to let California regulate the sale or rental of violent video games to children, saying governments do not have the power to "restrict the ideas to which children may be exposed" despite complaints about graphic violence.</p><p>On a 7-2 vote, the high court upheld a federal appeals court decision to throw out the state's ban on the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Sacramento had ruled that the law violated minors' rights under the First Amendment, and the high court agreed.</p><p>"No doubt a state possesses legitimate power to protect children from harm," said Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the majority opinion. "But that does not include a free-floating power to restrict the ideas to which children may be exposed."</p><p>The California law would have prohibited the sale or rental of violent games to anyone under 18. Retailers who violated the act would have been fined up to $1,000 for each infraction.</p><p>More than 46 million American households have at least one video-game system, with the industry bringing in at least $18 billion in 2010.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/us_supreme_court_violent_video_games/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/us_supreme_court_violent_video_games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creator of offensive campaign ad won&#8217;t apologize</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/hahn_offensive_ad_ehlinger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/hahn_offensive_ad_ehlinger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/15/hahn_offensive_ad_ehlinger</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The man behind the shocking video won't apologize for portraying a female congressional hopeful as a stripper]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The creator of a deliberately offensive ad portraying a female congressional candidate as a stripper and featuring two black men holding guns and repeatedly screaming, "Give me your cash, bitch!" is refusing to apologize to critics of the spot.</p><p>"We decided we would launch with a controversial ad that would piss a lot of people off," says Ladd Ehlinger, Jr., a conservative filmmaker who has produced unconventional political ads <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jU7fhIO7DG0&amp;feature=player_embedded">in the past</a>. "If I get dinged a little, then so be it," he adds, acknowledging that he wrote and produced the ad for his new political group, <a href="http://www.turnrightusa.org/">Turn Right USA</a>.</p><p>The ad targets Los Angeles Councilwoman Janice Hahn, who is running in a special election for an open congressional seat against a tea partyer named Craig Huey. Here is the ad (NSFW):</p><p>
    <object style="height: 390px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EZ3B8WvVjL4?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EZ3B8WvVjL4?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/hahn_offensive_ad_ehlinger/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/hahn_offensive_ad_ehlinger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do liberals hate freedom so much?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/why_do_liberals_hate_freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/why_do_liberals_hate_freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/06/15/why_do_liberals_hate_freedom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... and other mysteries from a Koch-funded study that ranks the 50 states according to how "free" they are]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do liberals hate freedom?</p><p>On June 7, the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, a libertarian think tank founded and funded by <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer">the Koch brothers,</a> released its latest snapshot of liberty in the U.S.A: <a href="http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/50States_2011_Embargoed_Copy.pdf">"Freedom in the 50 States: An Index of Personal and Economic Freedom."</a></p><p>As is usually the case in <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2011/03/02/chamber_of_commerce_war_against_the_blue_states/index.html">studies of this sort,</a> high-population blue states inevitably end up ranking last. The metrics used by the authors of the study penalize high taxes, regulations and, in general, just about anything that restricts the freedom of individuals and corporations to do as they please, from gun control laws and healthcare mandates to rules requiring seat belts and motorcycle helmets. Befitting libertarian sensibilities, the ideological biases in the Mercatus report do not purely jibe with conservative Republican priorities -- states get points for decriminalizing marijuana and allowing same sex marriage or civil unions, for example -- but nevertheless, the political gist is hard to ignore. Blue states cluster at the bottom, while red states are at the top.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/why_do_liberals_hate_freedom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/why_do_liberals_hate_freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>344</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge to decide Calif. gay marriage case Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/us_gay_marriage_trial_17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/us_gay_marriage_trial_17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/14/us_gay_marriage_trial_17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impartiality of judge who ruled Prop 8 unconstitutional is in question]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge is deciding whether a gay judge's ruling to strike down California's same-sex marriage ban should be overturned because he failed to divulge his own marital intentions before throwing out the voter-approved measure.</p><p>Chief U.S. District Judge James Ware said he would issue a decision within 24 hours after a hearing Monday in which lawyers trying to salvage the ban posed an unprecedented legal argument questioning Judge Vaughn Walker's impartiality when he issued last year's landmark ruling that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional.</p><p>The lawyers insisted that Walker, who was chief judge of the Northern District of California at the time, should have recused himself or disclosed his relationship because he and his partner stood to personally benefit from the verdict.</p><p>"It now appears that Judge Walker, at the time the complaint was filed and throughout this litigation, occupied precisely those same shoes as the plaintiffs," attorney Charles Cooper said.</p><p>Ware, who inherited the Proposition 8 case from the now-retired Walker, asked why Cooper assumed Walker had any intention of getting married, just because he was in a decade-old relationship.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/us_gay_marriage_trial_17/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/us_gay_marriage_trial_17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-cop in CA transit shooting death to be released</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/us_train_station_shooting_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/us_train_station_shooting_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/13/us_train_station_shooting_3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Johannes Mehserle was convicted last July in the killing of Oscar Grant on an Oakland train station platform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A white former San Francisco Bay area transit officer convicted of fatally shooting an unarmed black man is expected to be released from jail next week after serving 11 months of a two-year sentence.</p><p>Johannes Mehserle is scheduled to be set free Monday from a Los Angeles County jail where he served his time after his high-profile trial was moved to Southern California last year.</p><p>"We've been informed that he will be released sometime that day," Alameda County Deputy District Attorney Teresa Drenick said Thursday.</p><p>Mehserle's attorney, Michael Rains, declined to comment Thursday on his client's pending release. Rains recently said in published reports that Mehserle is ready to move on with his life.</p><p>But there could be backlash, as another series of rallies and protests will be held in both Los Angeles and Oakland before and after Mehserle's release.</p><p>Mehserle, 29, was convicted last July in the shooting death of Oscar Grant on an Oakland train station platform on New Year's Day 2009. The incident was recorded by bystanders, and video posted online showed the Bay Area Rapid Transit officer firing a single bullet into the back of Grant, 22, as he lay face down after being pulled off a train for allegedly fighting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/us_train_station_shooting_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/us_train_station_shooting_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California inmates will be shifted to local jails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/us_california_prisons_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/us_california_prisons_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/07/us_california_prisons_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brown administration responds to Supreme Court's order to slash the state prison population]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov. Jerry Brown's administration responded Tuesday to a U.S. Supreme Court order to quickly slash California's prison population, saying the governor's stalled plan to shift thousands of inmates from state prisons to local jails will eventually address the overcrowding problem.</p><p>The administration acknowledged in its response to the high court that it might not meet the court's initial goal of cutting the prison population by more than 10,000 inmates by the end of November. But it did not request a delay.</p><p>"What we've said is we're going to move forward with this plan and we'll ask for more time if we need it," Corrections Secretary Matthew Cate said at a news conference.</p><p>The latest count shows California's 33 prisons housing 143,565 inmates in space designed for fewer than 80,000, meaning the prisons are at 180 percent of their design capacity.</p><p>In an order late last month, the Supreme Court gave California two years to remove more than 33,000 inmates after the justices ruled easing congestion is the only way to improve unconstitutionally poor inmate medical care.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/us_california_prisons_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/us_california_prisons_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jaycee Dugard kidnapper gets 431-year sentence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_kidnapped_girl_found/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_kidnapped_girl_found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/02/us_kidnapped_girl_found</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phillip Garrido and his wife, Nancy, both pleaded guilty to kidnapping and rape]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A serial sex offender was ordered Thursday to spend the rest of his life in prison after the California woman he kidnapped, raped and held captive for 18 years said he and his wife had stolen her life.</p><p>Victim Jaycee Dugard was 11 when she was abducted by Phillip and Nancy Garrido as her stepfather watched her walk toward a school bus. She gave birth to two daughters fathered by Garrido while he held her in a secret backyard compound.</p><p>The defendants, both wearing orange jumpsuits, made no eye contact with anyone in the courtroom and kept their heads down as Dugard's mother, Terry Probyn, read her daughter's statement at the hearing. Dugard, now 31, was not present in court.</p><p>"I chose not to be here today because I refuse to waste another second of my life in your presence," Dugard wrote in a portion of the statement directed to Phillip Garrido. "Everything you ever did to me was wrong and I hope one day you will see that.</p><p>"I hated every second of every day for 18 years," she said "You stole my life and that of my family."</p><p>It was Dugard's first public statement since she was found 22 months ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_kidnapped_girl_found/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_kidnapped_girl_found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s what prison overcrowding looks like</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/california_prison_photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/california_prison_photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/24/california_prison_photos</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See the photos used to convince the Supreme Court that California prison living conditions are unconstitutional]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court <a href="http://www.salon.com/wires/us/2011/05/23/D9ND6MP80_us_supreme_court_california_prisons/index.html">decided</a> Monday -- by a partisan 5-4 split -- to order a reduction in California's prison population (read the full opinion <a href="http://www.prisonlaw.com/pdfs/BrownvPlata.pdf">here</a>). The Court's order stipulates that over 30,000 prisoners be removed from the state prison system within the next two years -- bringing the current total of around 143,000 prisoners down to a maximum of 110,000. (The system is only equipped to handle about 80,000.)</p><p>With its decision, the Court affirmed that prison overcrowding in the state has had severe repercussions as far as the medical treatment of inmates (for both physical and mental complaints) goes -- leading to conditions that constitute "cruel and unusual punishment," and thus violate the Eighth Amendment.</p><p>Unusually, several black-and-white <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/newsfix/2011/05/23/scott-shafer-explains-todays-major-supreme-court-ruling-on-california-prison-overcrowding/">photographs</a> were published with the ruling opinion, to illustrate claims about living conditions in the jails. They were only three of many more submitted to the Court as exhibits in the case. You can see more of the <a href="http://www.rbg-law.com/home-page-2/news/selected-coleman-plata-trial-materials/photos">images</a> that convinced the Supreme Court of prison overcrowding's unconstitutionality below.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/california_prison_photos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/california_prison_photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When &#8220;free&#8221; trade trumps U.S. law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/free_trade_corporations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/free_trade_corporations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/2011/05/24/free_trade_corporations</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WTO finds American requirements for tuna labels too restrictive. That's just the beginning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to "free" trade, <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/Ralph_Nader_Free_Trade.htm">Ralph Nader</a> (among others) often makes a profound but taboo observation: "True free trade would take only one page for a trade agreement," he says before typically asking, "How come there are hundreds of pages and thousands of regulations" in these pacts?</p><p>The answer is that so-called free trade agreements (i.e., NAFTA, <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/04/113687/obama-administration-moves-forward.html">bilateral NAFTA replicas</a>, the WTO regime, etc.) are free only of protections for human beings -- that is, free of provisions that preserve, say, labor rights, human rights and the environment. But those deals' "hundreds of pages" are chock-full of protectionist provisions for multinational companies -- provisions that, for example, allow foreign firms to sue governments for lost profits and empower international panels to unilaterally override a nation's domestic laws if those laws reduce corporate revenues.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/free_trade_corporations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/free_trade_corporations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court backs release of California inmates</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/23/us_supreme_court_california_prisons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/23/us_supreme_court_california_prisons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/23/us_supreme_court_california_prisons</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bench orders state to cut its prison population]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court on Monday endorsed a court order requiring California to cut its prison population by tens of thousands of inmates to improve health care for those who remain behind bars.</p><p>The court said in a 5-4 decision that the reduction is "required by the Constitution" to correct longstanding violations of inmates' rights. The order mandates a prison population of no more than 110,000 inmates, still far above the system's designed capacity.</p><p>There are more than 142,000 inmates in the state's 33 adult prisons, meaning roughly 32,000 inmates will need to be transferred to other jurisdictions or released.</p><p>Justice Anthony Kennedy, a California native, wrote the majority opinion, in which he included photos of severe overcrowding. The court's four Democratic appointees joined with Kennedy.</p><p>"The violations have persisted for years. They remain uncorrected," Kennedy said. The lawsuit challenging the provision of mental health care was filed in 1990.</p><p>Justice Antonin Scalia said in dissent that the court order is "perhaps the most radical injunction issued by a court in our nation's history."</p><p>Scalia, reading his dissent aloud Monday, said it would require the release of "the staggering number of 46,000 convicted felons."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/23/us_supreme_court_california_prisons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/23/us_supreme_court_california_prisons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Maria Shriver stood by her man</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/arnold_maria_2003/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/arnold_maria_2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/17/arnold_maria_2003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would Arnold have ever been governor if his wife hadn't been so willing to tell voters, "It's OK"?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/republican_party/index.html?story=/ent/movies/2011/05/17/schwarzenegger_family_values">revelation</a> that Arnold Schwarzenegger fathered a child with a longtime member of his household staff more than a decade ago -- and before he entered politics -- would seem to help explain the recent news that he and his wife, former NBC journalist Maria Shriver, are splitting.</p><p>But it also casts a new light on the biggest favor Shriver ever did for her husband's career, when his effort to claim the top job in America's largest state was in danger of crumbling apart.</p><p>It was in the final days of September 2003 that Schwarzenegger deigned to participate in a debate for the first time in his political career. He did it because he had to, not because he wanted to: He had pulled ahead in California's free-for-all gubernatorial recall contest, but doubts about his intellect and basic grasp of public policy remained. He had to prove he could sit on a stage with Serious People and not make a fool of himself.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/arnold_maria_2003/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/arnold_maria_2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schwarzenegger reveals he had child with staffer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/us_schwarzenegger_shriver_separation_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/us_schwarzenegger_shriver_separation_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/17/us_schwarzenegger_shriver_separation_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former California governor says he told his wife earlier this year; the news reportedly prompted her to move out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has acknowledged that he fathered a child with a member of his household staff, a revelation that apparently prompted wife Maria Shriver to leave the couple's home before they announced their separation last week.</p><p>Schwarzenegger and Shriver jointly announced May 9 that they were splitting up after 25 years of marriage. Yet, Shriver moved out of the family's Brentwood mansion earlier in the year after Schwarzenegger acknowledged the child is his, The Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday.</p><p>"After leaving the governor's office I told my wife about this event, which occurred over a decade ago," Schwarzenegger told the Times in a statement that also was sent to The Associated Press early Tuesday. "I understand and deserve the feelings of anger and disappointment among my friends and family. There are no excuses and I take full responsibility for the hurt I have caused. I have apologized to Maria, my children and my family. I am truly sorry.</p><p>"I ask that the media respect my wife and children through this extremely difficult time," the statement concluded. "While I deserve your attention and criticism, my family does not."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/us_schwarzenegger_shriver_separation_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/us_schwarzenegger_shriver_separation_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;m Korean!&#8221; California House candidate trying too hard to go viral</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/adler_race_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/adler_race_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/12/adler_race_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan Adler would like you, and the voters of California's 36th, to know that he married to a Korean woman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Adler, some sort of former Walt Disney Company executive, is running for the U.S. House seat being vacated by Jane Harman. And he is producing ads that muddy the distinction between intentionally and unintentionally funny, because that's how a candidate gets noticed in this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rZdAB4V_j8">post-Mike Gravel</a> world.</p><p>This is the one that has gotten the <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2011/05/12/racial-politicking-in-californ">most attention</a> <a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/05/i-have-issues-im-korean">so far,</a> because it's insane and probably horribly ill-advised! <object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gerq4GpHpKw?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gerq4GpHpKw?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object></p><p>Ham-handed plays for the votes of large minority populations in urban areas are as American as large minority populations in urban areas, but this might be pitched less at Asian-American voters than at, say, people on the internet? In which case, very nice work with making sure no one is an embarrassing caricature.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/adler_race_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/adler_race_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crisis on the California coast?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/west_coast_sea_levels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/west_coast_sea_levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/06/west_coast_sea_levels</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Golden State and its neighbors face a possible sea-level rise of 14 inches by 2050. Here's what that could mean]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times this week <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/06/us/06bcshort.html?_r=1&amp;hpw">reported</a> that oceanographers believe "developed low-lying shorelines" such as San Francisco's Embarcadero face "a possible rise of 14 inches in sea level by 2050" -- just under 40 years from now.</p><p>It's not uncommon to read scientists' predictions about rising sea levels and the crises they could cause. But to many non-scientists, the practical consequences of such climate alterations are fuzzy. If the oceanographers cited in the Times are correct, our own American shores face a transformative alteration in the immediate future. But just how dramatic would a 14-inch sea level rise be? And how would we see its effects in our everyday lives?</p><p>Salon spoke to professor Peter Ward, author of <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Flooded-Earth/e/9780465009497/?itm=2&amp;USRI=the+flooded+earth">"The Flooded Earth:&#160;Our Future in a World Without Ice Caps"</a> (whom we've <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/07/06/the_flooded_earth_interview">interviewed</a> before), who explained that while a 14-inch sea level rise is frightening enough on its own, it's the specter of a resulting "storm surge" -- and the failure of many local authorities to plan effectively for the future -- that actually worries him the most.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/west_coast_sea_levels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/west_coast_sea_levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

