<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > carbon emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/carbon_emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Green Movement isn&#8217;t fringe!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/michael_grunwald_im_a_respectable_environmentalist_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/michael_grunwald_im_a_respectable_environmentalist_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Island Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Time correspondent's poignant critique of the Keystone XL pipeline still manages to slight environmentalists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.earthisland.org/journal/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/earth-island-journal-green-tagline-flat.jpg" alt="Earth Island Journal" align="left" /></a> Environmentalists on Thursday were electrified by <a href="http://swampland.time.com/2013/02/28/im-with-the-tree-huggers/">an essay</a> by TIME national correspondent <a href="http://www.michaelgrunwald.com/">Michael Grunwald</a> offering his support for the campaign against the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. After suffering a week’s worth of <a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/18/is-there-room-fo-varied-approaches-to-energy-and-climate-progress/">slights</a> from <a href="http://ensia.com/voices/why-its-good-to-debate-strategies-to-address-climate-change/">armchair quarterbacks</a> dissing the Keystone opposition as wooly headed and un-strategic here, finally, was a member of the establishment commentariat saying the recent protests in Washington were spot-on.</p><p>In an essay titled, “I’m with the tree huggers,” Grunwald wrote:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/michael_grunwald_im_a_respectable_environmentalist_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/michael_grunwald_im_a_respectable_environmentalist_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doha climate talks meet low expectations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/doha_climate_talks_meet_low_expectations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/doha_climate_talks_meet_low_expectations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COP 18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The COP 18 summit didn't intend to address big questions, but resolve technical issues -- it's barely done that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 18th U.N. climate change summit closes Friday after two weeks, having just about lived up to low expectations. Delegates from 194 nations met in Doha to sluggishly hammer out agreements intended to prepare the ground for more serious negotiations next year, when talks will begin on drafting a global agreement, binding developed and developing countries to cuts in greenhouse gas emissions by 2015.</p><p>As such, the COP 18 talks were never intended to achieve new commitments on cutting CO2 emissions, but rather clear up details and disagreements that currently exist between nations over climate issues, in order to clear the way for a 2015 agreement. But as the summit reaches its final day, many of these issues still remain unresolved.</p><p>"The Doha talks represent the hinge point between the existing UN system -- the 15-year-old Kyoto protocol -- and a future system to be settled by 2015," <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20639215">explained BBC environment analyst </a>Roger Harrabin, adding, "The transition has drawn all the world's nations into a negotiation of swirling diplomatic complexity."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/doha_climate_talks_meet_low_expectations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/doha_climate_talks_meet_low_expectations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
