<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Carolyn McCarthy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/carolyn_mccarthy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Feinstein on assault weapons ban: &#8220;No weapon is taken from anyone&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/feinstein_on_assault_weapons_ban_no_weapon_is_taken_from_anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/feinstein_on_assault_weapons_ban_no_weapon_is_taken_from_anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault weapons ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolyn McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High-capacity magazines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats lay out the new version of legislation that would ban 158 types of assault weapons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a press conference Thursday, Democrats unveiled a new version of the assault weapons ban that they will introduce into the House and Senate, which includes a ban on 158 specifically named military-style firearms.</p><p>Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who sponsored the Senate version of the bill and who worked on the assault weapons ban from the '90s that expired in 2004, said in her remarks that this will be a "tough battle," but she is "incensed that our weak gun laws allow these mass killings to be carried out again and again and again in this country."</p><p>"The common thread in these shootings is that each gunman used a semi-automatic assault weapon" or a large-capacity magazine, Feinstein said.</p><p>The legislation specifically prohibits 158 types of military-grade firearms, as well as other semi-automatic rifles, handguns and shotguns that can have a detachable magazine and have at least one military characteristic. As Feinstein explained, the 1994 version of the law had a two-characteristic test for a weapon to be banned, but that was "too easy to work around."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/feinstein_on_assault_weapons_ban_no_weapon_is_taken_from_anyone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/feinstein_on_assault_weapons_ban_no_weapon_is_taken_from_anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Dems to propose large-capacity gun magazine ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/house_dems_to_propose_large_capacity_magazine_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/house_dems_to_propose_large_capacity_magazine_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assault weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolyn McCarthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would not include equipment that is already legally owned]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congressional Democrats will reintroduce a bill banning large-capacity gun magazines on Jan. 3, the first day of the new Congressional session, the Huffington Post <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/28/high-capacity-magazines-bill_n_2376838.html?1356722014">reports</a>. The bill will "mirror" the failed Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act that was proposed in January 2011, but has more support from Democrats in the wake of the Newtown massacre.</p><p>The last bill would have prohibited any "magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition" except for any "attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition." Large-capacity magazines were used in the Aurora and Newtown massacres.</p><p>Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has also promised to introduce an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/">assault weapons ban</a> when the new Congress convenes. That bill is modeled on the federal ban, which expired in 2004. Both new bills would not outlaw the possession of banned equipment that is already in circulation. Senator Feinstein has cited a Department of Justice study that the ban reduced gun deaths by 6.7 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/house_dems_to_propose_large_capacity_magazine_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/house_dems_to_propose_large_capacity_magazine_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
