<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Cathrynn Brown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/cathrynn_brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cathrynn Brown wants to abort mission</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/cathrynn_brown_wants_to_abort_mission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/cathrynn_brown_wants_to_abort_mission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cathrynn Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Bill 206]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13181736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Republican is now "horrified" at her own proposed rape-victim-punishing bill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Just one day after quietly introducing a whopper of a bill that would categorize abortions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest as "tampering with evidence," New Mexico State Rep. Cathrynn N. Brown found herself doing some swift damage control.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px;">As it </span><a style="font-size: 13px;" href="http://www.nmlegis.gov/Sessions/13%20Regular/bills/house/HB0206.html">still currently appears on the New Mexico Legislature's page</a><span style="font-size: 13px;">, Bill HB206 is blazingly, insanely straightforward. It explains that "tampering with evidence shall include procuring or facilitating an abortion, or compelling or coercing another to obtain an abortion of a fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest with the intent to destroy evidence of the crime" and states "whoever commits tampering with evidence shall be punished" with varying degrees of felony charges. Isn't it sweet when politicians try to defend the cause of "life" by categorizing fetuses as "evidence"? As <a href="https://twitter.com/Sedna_51/status/294536133730263041">one skeptic pondered</a> Thursday, "So I assume, as evidence, the court will be holding the fetus in a locker and destroying it after trial?"</span></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/cathrynn_brown_wants_to_abort_mission/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/cathrynn_brown_wants_to_abort_mission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
