<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Charles Krauthammer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/charles_krauthammer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:12:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How not to stop a massacre</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_not_to_stop_a_massacre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_not_to_stop_a_massacre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Krauthammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the real world, we can't stop massacres without limiting gun access]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the Newtown massacre, conservatives have expressed a great deal of concern about mental health. A cynic might say the average Republican congressman would rather spew platitudes about mental health, or the media culture (or virtually anything else) than talk about guns. Nonetheless, mental health's emergence as a national issue is potentially a welcome development.</p><p>"Let's be serious" Charles Krauthammer, pundit and former practicing psychiatrist, wrote recently in the<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/charles-krauthammer/2011/02/24/ADJkW7B_page.html"> Washington Post</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Monsters shall always be with us, but in earlier days they did not roam free. As a psychiatrist in Massachusetts in the 1970s, I committed people — often right out of the emergency room — as a danger to themselves or to others. I never did so lightly, but I labored under none of the crushing bureaucratic and legal constraints that make involuntary commitment infinitely more difficult today.</p> <p>Why do you think we have so many homeless? Destitution? Poverty has declined since the 1950s. The majority of those sleeping on grates are mentally ill. In the name of civil liberties, we let them die with their rights on.</p> <p>A tiny percentage of the mentally ill become mass killers. Just about everyone around Tucson shooter Jared Loughner sensed he was mentally ill and dangerous. But in effect, he had to kill before he could be put away — and (forcibly) treated.</p> <p>Random mass killings were three times more common in the 2000s than in the 1980s, when gun laws were actually weaker. Yet a 2011 University of California at Berkeley study found that states with strong civil-commitment laws have about a one-third lower homicide rate.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_not_to_stop_a_massacre/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_not_to_stop_a_massacre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 2: The Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Krauthammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The capital's daily paper is the one with the worst opinion section in the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>The Washington Post is the hometown paper of the city that everyone in America hates, usually for good reason. And the things Americans hate about that city and the people who work there are reflected in its pages.</p><p>The newspaper itself is an ever smaller and more starved-looking thing. The people running it used to actually compete with the New York Times, for readers and writers and national influence. Now they can't really decide if they even want to try.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pundit: GOP should buy women&#8217;s magazines</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pundit_gop_should_buy_womens_magazines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pundit_gop_should_buy_womens_magazines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Harlan Reynolds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Krauthammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instapundit says Republicans should sway voters through the media]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a New York Post <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/where_big_gop_bucks_could_matter_sud7apkPHDcFSVDDZkFDEL">editorial</a>, <a href="http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/">Instapundit’s</a> Glenn Harlan Reynolds has a simple reason for why Republicans <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/08/republicans-learn-the-cost-of-alienating-women-voters.html">performed poorly</a> with “low-information” female voters: The party didn't make nice in the media. Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson threw $150 million at the campaign but Reynolds would like to see the money spent on a friendlier brand of propaganda than attack ads:</p><blockquote><p>My suggestion: Buy some women’s magazines. No, really. Or at least some women’s Web sites…</p> <p>For $150 million, you could buy or start a lot of women’s Web sites. And I’d hardly change a thing in the formula. The nine articles on sex, shopping and exercise could stay the same. The 10th would just be the reverse of what’s there now.</p> <p>For the pro-Republican stuff, well, just visit the “Real Mitt Romney” page at snopes.com, or look up the time Mitt Romney <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/the-time-mitt-romney-rescued-a-14-year-old-kidnap">rescued </a>a 14-year-old kidnap victim, to see the kind of feel-good stories that could have been running. For the others, well, it would run articles on whether Bill Clinton should get a pass on his affairs, whether it’s right that the Obama White House pays women less than men, and reports on how the tax system punishes women.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pundit_gop_should_buy_womens_magazines/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pundit_gop_should_buy_womens_magazines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>