<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Charles W. Carrico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/charles_w_carrico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia Republicans move forward with mass disenfranchisement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/virginia_republicans_move_forward_with_mass_disenfranchisement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/virginia_republicans_move_forward_with_mass_disenfranchisement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electoral Votes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles W. Carrico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Senate subcommittee has recommended a bill to rig the state's electoral vote allocation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> This morning, I <a href="http://prospect.org/article/republicans-are-seriously-considering-plan-rig-electoral-system">wrote</a> on an emerging Republican plan—in swing states won by President Obama—to rig presidential elections by awarding electoral votes to the winner of the most congressional districts. Because Democratic voters tend to cluster in highly-populated urban areas, and Republican voters tend to reside in more sparsely populated regions, this makes <em>land</em> the key variable in elections—to win the majority of a state’s electoral votes, your voters will have to occupy the most geographic space.</p><p>In addition to disenfranchising voters in dense areas, this would end the principle of “one person, one vote.” If Ohio operated under this scheme, for example, Obama would have received just 22 percent of the electoral votes, despite winning 52 percent of the popular vote in the state.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/virginia_republicans_move_forward_with_mass_disenfranchisement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/virginia_republicans_move_forward_with_mass_disenfranchisement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
