Chicago

The original regular

Cynthia Joyce reviews Liz Phair's new album, 'whitechocolatespaceegg'

  • more
    • All Share Services

It’s the rare artist who, upon breaking new ground, chooses to stay there and wait for the prefab suburbs to sprout up around her. But Liz Phair is a rare artist, one who bulldozed right through the bedrock with her 1993 debut, “Exile in Guyville,” reinventing the regular-girl-with-guitar genre with a potent mix of musical ingenuity and sexual bravado. Phair won over legions of giddy male fans with lines like “I want to be your blow-job queen,” but it was mostly women who identified with the emotional scars she revealed just as explicitly: “You’ve never been a waste of my time/It’s never been a drag,” she droned sarcastically on “The Divorce Song,” spitting out the words as if she were trying to expel a bitter aftertaste.

“It was like her mouth was moving, but my words were coming out,” a friend recently said to me, describing how she felt when she first heard the songs on “Exile.” Sure, plenty of pop stars have inspired imitators, but Liz Phair was possibly the first pop star to make women feel like she was impersonating them.

Still, it’s one thing to get people’s attention by inviting them to read your dirty mind; it’s another thing entirely to keep their attention while you move onto the less titillating topics of marriage and babies. That’s the challenge the 31-year-old wife and mother now faces with her third full-length album, “whitechocolatespaceegg,” which has critics and fans wondering whether, musically, a less conflicted Liz Phair is a good thing.

Turns out it is — much of the time, anyway. While “whitechocolatespaceegg” doesn’t do much to contradict the theory that a well-adjusted artist is less interesting than a tortured one, at its best it’s a fascinating portrait of an urban hipster opting for early retirement. Gone are the hairpin turns of phrase, point-blank punch lines and drop-dead delivery of “Exile” (and, to a lesser extent, of “Whip-Smart”); in their place are intentionally oblique lyrics and more conventional song structures that shift the focus onto Phair’s more refined (and presumably more practiced) singing voice. But the best songs — “Polyester Bride,” “What Makes You Happy” and “Perfect World” among them — still have that appealing spoken word/conversational air about them, as if you just walked in on her midstory and you can only imagine which delicious details you missed.

There are a few moments of heartbreaking poignancy as well. On “What Makes You Happy,” a younger Phair is trying to convince her mother — and herself — of her new boyfriend’s merits: “I’m sending you this photograph/I swear this one is gonna last/and all those other bastards were only practice.” She goes on to describe how being in love feels like a “full recovery,” but her desperate wail suggests her mother’s doubts only mirror her own. It’s a revealing moment, as it perfectly describes that pivotal phase when a young woman finally accepts the fact that no matter how immersed she is in a certain scene — or, in Phair’s case, how adept she’s become at blowing spitballs at it — her mother is still a bigger influence on her life than a thousand rock critics and self-appointed scene makers could ever be.

Phair’s career has always been dominated by the critic-artist dynamic; she’s gone from darling to punching bag and back again in the space of only two albums. Part of this backlash could be chalked up to the fact that critics were annoyed that Phair was never a particularly devoted artist, just a talented one. She never copped to a starving-artist myth of the Jewel/Mary Lou Lord variety; she never pretended she’d still be doing this if it meant living in a trailer; and once she got her Rolling Stone cover and a chance to give the finger to any of her foes, she acted as if she didn’t care that much to begin with. On “whitechocolate,” she even goes so far as to suggest that the whole integrity trip is a farce anyway: “It’s nice to be liked, but it’s better by far to get paid,” she sings on “Shitloads of Money” — and ironically it’s one of the most sincere-sounding songs on the record.

At its worst, “whitechocolate” is simply underwhelming. But it’s underwhelming in the same way that the Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee unauthorized home video was underwhelming: For all its promise of sexual prowess and raw footage, all you got was the missionary position and close-ups of the family dogs. But you kept watching — not because you were hoping for something more, but because of how shockingly ordinary it all was.

What ultimately makes “whitechocolatespaceegg” compelling is not clever song craft or cunning lyrics, but the very adultlike air of acceptance that pervades the album. That doesn’t mean Phair has forgotten about the more vulnerable times — times when you can trick yourself into thinking that just one thing stands between you and a perfect life: “I wanna be cool, tall, vulnerable and luscious/I could have it all if I only had this much,” she sings on “Perfect World,” using every inch of her limited alto range. But for the first time Phair acknowledges that it’s the mundane things that make a life real — and that a real life is the only one worth working at: “Love is nothing like they say/You gotta pick up the little pieces every day.” And if that means that she lets “Exile” stand as her best work, who can blame her?

Cynthia Joyce is a writer living in New Orleans.

Rufus Wainwright

Sharps & Flats is a weekly music review roundup in Salon Magazine

  • more
    • All Share Services

I never would have imagined that anyone even remotely related to Loudon Wainwright III, the world’s crankiest living folk singer, could actually believe in love. But his openly gay 24-year-old son, Rufus Wainwright, not only believes in it, he structures his world around its complexities, frustrations and rewards.

On his self-titled debut of lushly crafted pop parlor songs (complete with Van Dyke Parks string arrangements), Wainwright poetically unfolds scenarios of foolish love and fantasy love, healing love and destructive love and love that makes you want to lose your sense of self just so you can find it again. “I don’t want to hold you and feel so helpless,” he confesses on “Foolish Love,” “I don’t want to smell you and lose my senses.”

No matter what accompanies the warm, chameleonlike creak and quiver of his voice — acoustic guitar, cascading piano, crashing cymbals or thumping timpani — Wainwright’s songs are all built on a similar set of angled melodies and hairpin turns of phrase. Yet each succeeds as its own distinctly intimate portrait of emotion and desire, whether he’s remembering the “charmingly daft” River Phoenix on “Matinee Idol” or offering desperate advice to the tragic opera heroes of “Damned Ladies,” whose arias “cause a stir in my sad, sad and lonely heart.” Wainwright’s willingness to so thoroughly accept his vulnerability as a way of life is a rare thing among contemporary singer-songwriters. Rarer still is that his search for grace persists — and once in a while, as in “Imaginary Love,” he finds it: a red face, a head resting on a lap in the green back seat of a cab, and the knowledge that what’s real can never be enough.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
Sean Lennon
INTO THE SUN | GRAND ROYAL
HEAR IT | BUY IT –>

BY DAWN EDEN | Sean Lennon’s long-awaited debut album is a surprisingly low-key affair, dotted with Brazilian-inspired rhythms and languid vocals. There’s also a strong low-fi sensibility, undoubtedly aided by producer Yuka Honda of Japanese dance-floor experimentalists Cibo Matto. Not coincidentally, Lennon is in love with Honda, and “Into the Sun” is an unabashed sonic valentine. The parallels between his ultra-close working relationship with Honda and that of his father and Yoko Ono are obvious. To Honda’s credit, she proves capable of separating business and pleasure. Far from turning Lennon into a one-man Cibo Matto, she seems to have made every effort to bring out his own unique sound — that is, inasmuch as he can be said to have one. His father aside, his main influence is Beck, and it shows in his use of analog synthesizers alongside prominent acoustic guitars. Also like Beck, he adores genre-jumping, giving nods to Stevie Wonder-style soul (“Two Fine Lovers”), tear-in-your-beer country (“Part One of the Cowboy Trilogy”) and piano balladry (the mordant “Wasted”).

Lennon’s voice is an acquired taste. With a nasal twang that would make They Might Be Giants blush, he sings below the notes. His melodies, however, are intriguing: “Two Fine Lovers” and “Queue” are sublimely catchy, with unpredictable chord changes in the manner of Burt Bacharach and Brian Wilson. As “Into the Sun” demonstrates, the young Lennon will be a potent force in 21st century pop if he continues to follow his own star.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
Mekons
ME | QUARTERSTICK
HEAR IT | BUY IT –>

BY MARK ATHITAKIS | The Mekons never said it was going to be easy. Not life, not love and certainly not rock music, which the band dismissed as “something to sell your labor for/when hair sprouts out below” on their finest record, 1989′s “Rock and Roll.” But the Chicago band (via Leeds, England) was making great rock even while they were uncomfortable with its trappings, anxiously searching for justice and sanity in drums, guitar chords and wailing violins. Twenty years after they started as art-damaged punk rockers, nothing’s changed, because the politics of rock haven’t changed; their chosen trade is just as polluted with greed, sexism and mediocrity as it ever was.

With all their deep thinking weighing down on the music, “Me” is rough going, both as rock album and political tract. Jumping from drum machine beats to country-folk to straightforward rock to absurdist lyrical rantings, it lacks the flow necessary to keep the deep thinking about sex and ego listenable; like most of the band’s recent albums, it sprawls badly. But from song to song, each song signifies, whether it’s Jon Langford’s nursery-rhyme chanting over the shambling beat of “Tourette’s,” or Sally Timms’ winsome vocals on the chirpy groove-pop “Mirror.” Cynical, joking, frustrated and philosophical, it’s post-structuralist pop for the next millennium.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
Joe Ely
TWISTIN’ IN THE WIND | MCA
HEAR IT | BUY IT –>

BY MEREDITH OCHS | Anyone who’s ever seen Joe Ely perform knows that he can captivate an audience with just an acoustic guitar and his gritty narratives, though he usually chooses to do so backed by a band that’s equal parts punk and honky tonk. The venerable roots rocker from Lubbock, Texas, was part of the legendary triumvirate of Texas songwriting talent (along with friends Jimmie Dale Gilmore and Butch Hancock) known as the Flatlanders, embarking on a solo career in the late ’70s that yielded a dozen albums. It’s dismaying, though, that Ely’s recorded output has often failed to reflect the dynamism of his live shows.

But No. 13 proves lucky for the singer/songwriter/guitarist. Recorded at his own Austin studio, the record is a satisfying amalgam of Ely’s many musical loves and pursuits. He tells his stories through border waltzes, barroom romps, Tejano twang, Neil Young-style rockers, jazzy blues and flamenco-tinged ballads, while guitarists who have recorded with him over the years — including David Grissom, Lloyd Maines and Jesse Taylor — add layers of sound texture and Southwestern imagery. Like Ely kicking his boots in the dirt — or on stage — “Twistin’ in the Wind” kicks hard.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
Dave Matthews Band
BEFORE THESE CROWDED STREETS | RCA
HEAR IT | BUY IT –>

BY LEORA BROYDO | Forget Viagra. “Before These Crowded Streets,” the third studio album from the Dave Matthews Band, could make even Church Lady feel like a sexpot. The release, which might have been more aptly titled “Before These Crowded Stadiums,” coincides with the start of DMB’s 54-show U.S./European tour, which is selling out huge concert venues within minutes.

The album delivers more of what has always attracted fans to the band: the jazzy rhythms and spirit-raising jams that have become the DMB’s stock and trade, as well as lyrical echoes of albums past; there’s hungry Dave (“Open wide, oh so good I’ll eat you”), thirsty Dave (“Let me drink you please, I won’t spill a drop, I promise you”) and, of course, merry Dave (“Come sister, my brother, shake up your bones, shake up your feet”).

If Matthews hikes up his skirt a little more here than on previous works, the world he shows us is deeper and darker than anything the band has laid down to date. Matthews takes his vocals to Araratian heights in “The Last Stop,” an emotional plea for Middle Eastern peace. In “Don’t Drink the Water,” Matthews does an eerie impression of Peter Gabriel and grumbles about greed with an angry (is she ever anything else?) Alanis Morissette singing backup. “Halloween” is a demented carousel ride ` la Tom Waits, backed with disturbing horror movielike tracks by the Kronos Quartet.

Matthews says of the album’s darker sentiments, “I don’t think the overall effect will be depressing.” He’s right. Somehow, when Matthews engages any spirits, be them dark or light, it’s a pleasurable experience.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
Scrawl
NATURE FILM | ELEKTRA
HEAR IT | BUY IT –>

BY GINA ARNOLD | Scrawl sings songs about the kind of things I care about, but though their harsh musical questioning of such common feelings as disillusionment, boredom and romantic regret can, at its best, banish one’s self-doubt by putting it all into words, the Columbus, Ohio, band has somehow missed the jump onto every all-girl bandwagon (foxcore, riot grrrl, angry women rock and so forth) that’s trolled by in the last 12 years. When I hear the low, rough-hewn voice of singer Marcy Mays set within these carefully crafted mid-tempo rock songs, I grieve at the knowledge that this stuff has no wide commercial appeal.

“Nature Film” is Scrawl’s new LP, but six of the songs on it are old ones, re-recorded for reasons of clarity and distribution (since the albums they come from are now out of print). “Charles” is one of Scrawl’s most famous tracks, a rewrite of Kiss’ “Beth” on which Mays tells her boyfriend that although she’ll be up all night playing with the band, he should wait up for sex. (“Put out or shut up/that’s the way it goes.”) It’s much faster than the original, and still works well, as do “Rot” and “Clock Song.” But the newer songs are the ones that show the most depth of feeling and emotional growth. “Standing Around” in particular is a lovely, heartfelt song about coming to terms with self-defeating mental stagnation, while “Nature Film” and “Guess I’ll Wait” explore similarly poignant and — to me — relevant life-themes. The record also contains a cover of PiL’s “Public Image.” In short, Scrawl’s not fit for Lilith Fair — and more power to them for that.

Continue Reading Close

Sharps and Flats: June of 44

Mark Athitakis reviews "Four Great Points" by June of 44.

  • more
    • All Share Services

One of the finest bands to spin off from the Louisville-Chicago math rock axis, June of 44 … wait, wait, hold on a second. Some explanations are in order about this “math rock” business. Lanky, wallet-chained indie rock obsessives have been swooning over math rock for years without a whisper in the mainstream, and even without a useful definition of what it is. Math rock (“post rock” also works well at cocktail parties) is a bit like pornography: You can’t say exactly what it is, but you know it when you hear it. Very generally, it’s Midwestern rock types combining styles that usually wouldn’t speak to each other: the loopy bass-heavy thrub of dub reggae, the guitar aggression of heavy metal and the clinical, claustrophobic sound of art-punk bands like Wire. Drum beats are syncopated, vocals are whispered little tales of anguish and the guitarists focus on little arpeggiated squiggles that break into distorted power chording just to make sure you’re paying attention. Think of Yes, or King Crimson with an attitude problem and defaulted student loans.

Math rock got its feet wet in Louisville, Ky., and its main oracle is Slint’s jaw-dropping 1991 record, “Spiderland,” an album some still listen to with the same awed reverence with which penitents gape weeping at icons of the Virgin Mary. Breaking up a week before the album’s release, Slint became an instant indie rock legend. What happened next created a scene more inbred than the Kentucky Derby: Not many people bought “Spiderland” when it came out, but everyone who did started a band, drawing mainly on musicians from Chicago and Louisville — each, apparently, with a former member of Slint. June of 44 features drummer John Scharin, who played in Codeine, members of which played in, er, Bitch Magnet, which featured members of Slint, which in turn played with … oh, forget it.

The point is this: One of the finest bands to spin off from the Louisville-Chicago math rock axis, June of 44 is moving the math rock sound forward in new ways that are both intense and eloquent. “Four Great Points,” the band’s third full-length album, is a consistently inventive record, and one that carries a level of emotion that’s rare in a genre often plagued with detached, highly textured noodling. Firmly grounded in Fred Erskine’s supple bass lines and Scharin’s at times ferocious drumming, songs like “Doomsday” and “Of Information and Belief” wander but retain their emotional focus. Guitarists Sean Meadows and Jeff Mueller do the quietude-to-raw noise thing better than most, shifting volumes and styles on a dime without making the songs sound like the sum of disparate, stapled-together parts. The tightness of the quartet’s playing is revealed during the pure funk-based lockgroove of “The Dexterity of Luck”: The music increasingly intensifies and sustains itself for six minutes, without one second of self-indulgence.

Random instruments fly into the mix: violins, Moog keyboards, the sleigh bells on the dub-happy “Lifted Bells,” even a typewriter on the closing “Air #17.” All of it with the goal of deconstructing rock styles in order to rebuild them: “Take down your art, take down your art,” Meadows chants repeatedly on “Does Your Heart Beat Slower,” which substitutes as a motto for the entire proceeding. What pervades all of “Four Great Points” is a limber, intelligent approach to the math rock style that ignores the genre’s shortcomings and even some of its common themes, with an accessibility that the purest of pure-pop fans can appreciate. If the obsessions and discographical schematics of lanky, wallet-chained indie rockers come off as foreign or even distasteful, June of 44 sounds thrilled to draw you a thrilling and highly articulate diagram.

Continue Reading Close

Mark Athitakis is a regular contributor to Salon.

Sharps and Flats: Paint It, Blue: Songs of the Rolling Stones

David Pulizzi reviews the Rolling Stone tribute album.

  • more
    • All Share Services

In the beginning, Mick and Keith had a shared vision of themselves as great, weary bluesmen, sitting on the porch of a weather-beaten bungalow down along the Delta. With guitars and harmonicas ever close at hand, they would sip corn whiskey straight from the jug and gaze off yonder at the rolling Mississippi. Day in, day out, that would be their earthly existence — at least until the good Lord above saw fit to call them home. That was their basic plan, back when the Glimmer Twins were both just a couple of anonymous middle-class Limeys with nothing better to do on a cold, gray evening but romanticize themselves right into a typical Southern sunset in Robert Johnson’s America.

When the Rolling Stones came to the States for the first time in 1964, they headed directly to the Chicago recording studios of the Chess brothers, Leonard and Phil, founders of the legendary blues label Chess Records. There, in sloppy and largely forgotten 12-bar increments, the Stones paid homage to their American blues heroes. As Francis Davis noted in “The History of the Blues,” the Stones’ early Chess covers basically “amounted to love letters to that label’s performers.”

But mere love letters and the innocent dreams of youth would never wholly contain the Stones. Soon, Mick and Keith would begin toying with the blues, like Elvis Presley had a decade earlier, stretching and twisting it in feverish, creative bursts into something the white kids might proudly and defiantly call their own. In the process, they dragged the blues into the super-heated social and political climate of mid- and late-1960s America, much as their wildly inventive progenitors at Chess had packed and hauled a completely retooled version of the old acoustic Delta blues up from the Deep South and into the industrialized, electrified urban atmosphere of postwar Chicago.

The liner notes for the new House of Blues release “Paint It, Blue: Songs of the Rolling Stones,” say that this compilation “is a celebration of the Rolling Stones’ early passion.” That seems a fair enough general assessment of this nicely packaged, exceedingly well-produced CD that includes 13 Stones nuggets, several of them well-known classics, performed by 12 fine and steady blues and soul acts, several of them classics as well.

There is very little on “Paint It, Blue” that doesn’t merit a close and appreciative listening. It is a potent, often inspired mix of artists and songs. Taj Mahal, singing like an old scaly lizard and playing a spare, greasily plucked rhythm on dobro, delivers an even sleazier take of “Honky Tonk Woman” than the Stones did on their original version in 1969; Junior Wells reduces the anthemic “Satisfaction” to a sly, harp-driven tale of personal lamentation in what may well be his last recording; the recently deceased Johnny Copeland, fueled by a meaty power-chord progression and a muscular, chugging rhythm section, burns his way through an absolutely jubilant “Tumblin’ Dice”; and Alvin “Youngblood” Hart’s plaintive recitation of “Moonlight Mile” is so lonesome and starkly beautiful it ought to be outlawed.

Mick and Keith must be smitten. After all this time and all the silly bullshit they’ve put themselves through, it must be a pleasure to sit back on the tour jet with “Paint It, Blue” on the headphones, listening in wonder as their peers and old heroes chase their coattails for a change. How amusing that must seem at 30,000 feet. Almost as amusing as that ridiculous notion they once had of being great, weary bluesmen with a weather-beaten shack down along the Delta. That was a good one, eh, Mick?

Continue Reading Close

David Pulizzi is a freelance writer in Pittsburgh.

Rolling Stones- Live at Soldier Field

  • more
    • All Share Services

At the kickoff for the Rolling Stones’ long-awaited U.S. tour, Mick Jagger wiggled like a sperm cell and gesticulated like a traffic cop steering a five-way intersection at rush hour. He hip-shuffled his way back and forth across an enormous stage decorated like some ancient Babylonian whorehouse, whipping the 54,000 Stones fans gathered at Soldier Field in
Chicago into a grade-A rock ‘n’ roll frenzy. Underneath the fireworks and
the puffs of dry ice, between the blaring horn section and the buttery
swell of backup singers, there were undeniable moments when the Stones
broke through as themselves, soaring sloppy as a flopping fish, rattling
loose as ball bearings in a glass jar, playing raw and simple rock ‘n roll.

The pre-show hype was as incessant and inescapable as an ad
campaign for a new triple-layer burrito at Taco Bell. DJ’s prattled on,
promising front row seats for the five thousandth caller and there were
endless newspaper articles touting Mick’s pre-show workout regimen, the
band’s roots in Chicago Blues and their new “genius” collaboration with
the Dust Brothers. Then the Stones sightings began: a secret show at a
local club sent fans scurrying to their cars; rumors of a sound check at
Soldier Field had boats circling Lake Michigan along the shores near the
arena. Stones Web sites began to download slower and slower as fans
surfed into the wee hours trying to guess where the Stones might pop up
next — sitting in at a local blues club or sweater shopping at Henri Bendel?

Nobody seemed to care if the new CD was any good. The Stones were in town! The Stones! Even the mayor cashed in on the hype with a news brief reassuring the public that
hazardous, fire-propelling propane tanks had been nixed from the show.
Local news teased us with footage of Jagger stepping out of limos all over
town. “Up next, another drive-by shooting and (tasteful pause) find out why
the Stones can’t get no satisfaction with city officials.” Channel 7′s
jovial weatherman, standing in front of his five-day
forecast, proclaimed, “Hey you, get offa my cloud. It looks like clear
skies for the Stones!”

By show day, I was so queasy with Stones hype I felt like I’d
eaten a three-pound bag of mini-Snickers bars. But the crowd pouring into
Soldier Field was anything but jaded. The parking lot was a sea of
screaming fans: “The greatest band on earth!” “Yeah, Stones rock!”

Still, we were a long way from Altamont. Long-haired freaks and
bikers were the clear minority. We could have been queuing up for a Bears
game or a Wisconsin craft show. Forty-something couples milled about in
football sweatshirts buying nachos and light beer. Vendors hawked roses and
Subway sandwiches. Even the women’s bathroom line felt more like Marshall Fields than
a rock show. Middle-aged women sporting Farrah flips whispered, “Pardon me”
as they squeezed through to the stalls. One woman in neatly-faded jeans and
rose lipstick addressed the line, “Does anyone have any … feminine
protection?” In unison, the ladies fumbled for their purses.

The show’s start was electric. With a giant explosion, the
band roared into “Satisfaction.” Keith Richards came stumbling out in
sunglasses and a long leopard-print coat. Ron Wood followed in bright red, and
finally Jagger came strutting down a staircase in his standard clown/ TV
pimp stage garb — black tux and blue scarf with gold fringe fluttering in the
wind. The video screen exploded with fast cuts — Keith’s skull ring as his
fingers flayed into power chords, Mick’s leathery face glistening with
sweat, Charlie Watts stony and dignified, looking très Urban Outfitters in
a collarless zip-up jacket, holding his drumsticks like a 19th century country gentleman loosely grasping the reins of his horse and buggy.

The band tore through the first half hour with a stream of
dependable hits. The crowd roared along to familiar choruses: “Let’s spend
the night together … It’s only rock ‘n’ roll but I like it, like it, yes I
do!”

Jagger marched across the vast stage with wild thrusting hips and
flailing arms, his lips and chin jutting huge across the video monitor. He tore
off coats and pulled on hats, stripping off his tuxedo jacket to a bright
yellow overshirt then down to a blue rhinestone muscle shirt then whipping
on black leather jackets, a red velvet long coat, a pullover sweater, a
silver windbreaker and sundry scarves.

Richards played the rock ‘n’ roll fool. He strutted center stage for
his sloppy, three-note solos, face pained and puzzled as his fingers bent
strings. He wandered back and forth between Ron Wood and bassist Darryl
Jones, facing them while he played as if begging help in figuring out the chords.

Wood kept to the side stage, trying to keep out of Jagger’s way as
he frantically whirled like 100 Stevie Nickses, playing the almighty
rock dervish — somewhere between a drag queen kick boxer and a first-grade
music teacher, wildly hand-clapping to entice the crowd into singing along.
Watts remained expressionless, refusing to crack a grin even when the video
monitor splashed him in close-up.

The Stones definitely had their moments. There was the gritty “Honky
Tonk Women,” roaring with Richards’ off-kilter guitar and his howling
out-of-tune back-up on “Ruby Tuesday.” And there were more poignant moments as well,
like when the soft trombone glided into, “You Can’t Always Get What You Want.”

There was also an unfortunately high cheese factor. The horn section swelled up to
cover many of Richards’ charmingly simplistic guitar riffs and the trio of
backup singers quickly roared in whenever Jagger’s voice faltered. The
videos exploding over the giant monitor descended into shots of women
gyrating in corsets during the few new songs played as if in some desperate
attempt to help the audience focus on the new material. During “Miss You,”
the videos flitted between dirty cartoons and shots of dead rock stars as if
to keep the audience awake while eulogizing Lennon, Garcia, et al.
When the band paused to call up their Web site on the giant monitor, choosing a song from a list voted on by fans on the Internet ( the winner, with a grand total of five tongues: “Under My Thumb”), it seemed more like a chance for Jagger to catch his breath than any real attempt at cyberspace excitement.

But, overall, it was hard not to love the Stones. They were clearly
aiming to please — which in itself is remarkable given their unshakable
status as rock icons. There was an air of inclusiveness about the night.
All of us, even the gray-haired man next to me in baseball cap and Dockers
felt cool enough to join in when Jagger sang, “Brown sugar, how come you
dance so good?”

There’s a sense of genuineness to the Stones’ hugeness, as if they
refuse to feel the irony of stardom — of being at once gray-haired and larger-than-life.
They seem comfortable with the simple truth that many a rock star grapples with unsuccessfully: that their job title is not social commentator or dark prophet, but simply entertainer.
“It’s good to be back,” Richards told the crowd. “It’s good to be.

Continue Reading Close

Rennie Sparks is a regular contributor to Salon.

Anne Rice's “Servant of the Bones” Diary

Greetings from the Windy City

  • more
    • All Share Services

we are presently in Chicago and our two signings, one in Detroit and one here, have been long, exciting and extremely emotionally rewarding for me. The big, gold bus carries us through miles of cornfields and then into the crowded, energized and always exciting streets of Chicago, a city of indefinable spirit. Again and again people embrace the theological questions of “Memnoch” and “The Servant of the Bones.” More and more, readers volunteer that they are Jewish or Catholic, or have a passionate spiritual obsession with living a worthwhile life. They seem to “get” just what I want them to get while finding the books page-turners.

As far as I can tell, “The Servant of the Bones” is being devoured. “Memnoch the Devil” is mentioned the most by people I meet, and it seems a countless number of young people enjoyed “The Mummy.” That’s what I hear out here. It’s thrilling more than exhausting. On the bus, I can wallow in Antonio Banderas movies — males are my muses, no doubt about it.

I can’t answer the questions people ask me about why my novels sell. I only feel the delicious heat of approval, and am always “writing” new novels in my head. My stuff’s weird, unpredictable, full of career sabotage in a way, in that I keep experimenting, shifting direction, mixing menstrual blood with Holy Communion. The readers say “Go, Anne.” And that’s my ticket to a new departure, a new investigation into the erotic.

I don’t give a damn about gender. Surely President Clinton will come around on same-sex marriages. Gender today is entirely a legal choice. Regarding the Democratic Convention, which is adding tremendous excitement to Chicago, naturally, isn’t it a mystery how the press heats up on Bill and Hillary? And they take it with such grace. Perhaps, unlike other First Families, the Clintons really do care more about us than they care about the press. Maybe that’s their most potent gift — they respect the press but are never manipulated or demoralized by it. Bill and Hillary care about what must surely be the most creative challenge of their lifetime. It’s breathtaking to watch them stride calmly through the brickbats and lies.

Love you,

August 26, 1996, 3:15 a.m.
Chicago

Continue Reading Close

Page 14 of 14 in Chicago