<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Chinese Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/chinese_economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:19:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In China, bachelorhood might be dangerous</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/in_china_bachelorhood_may_be_dangerouspartne_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/in_china_bachelorhood_may_be_dangerouspartne_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twelve to 15 percent of the male population is single, posing a threat to the country's social stability]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">In the last few years, </span><a style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chinas-all-china-womens-federation-2012-10" target="_blank">the phenomena of China's "leftover women"</a><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"> — that is, women over the age of 28 who are unmarried — has become a hot topic amongst China and China-watchers.</span><br /> <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a><br /> But the <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chinas-leftover-women-theyre-too-good-2013-1" target="_blank">fact is these so-called leftover women are probably an overhyped concern</a>, perhaps driven by government worries about a more likely problem — leftover men, aka "bare branches."</p><p>Yes, given a combination of China's one child policy and a traditional preference for sons, China may be looking at 12 to 15 percent of its male population being unable to find a wife. As <a href="http://www.tealeafnation.com/2013/02/for-millions-of-chinese-men-lonely-life-as-bare-branch-looms/" target="_blank">Jessica Levine writes at Tea Leaf Nation</a>, that's pretty much the population of Texas.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/in_china_bachelorhood_may_be_dangerouspartne_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/in_china_bachelorhood_may_be_dangerouspartne_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teaching the People&#8217;s Republic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/teaching_the_peoples_republic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/teaching_the_peoples_republic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12999126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came to Shaoyang to train teachers. What I found was a class of people -- and a country -- in a state of flux]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BETWEEN 1999 AND 2001 I lived in Shaoyang, a city in Hunan province famous for clementines and murder. The clementines were best when green-skinned and sour; about the murders, I cannot speak.</p><p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los  Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a> Though 'Shaoyang' means 'the town on the north bank of the Shao river,' it spreads along the junction of two: the pale green Shao Shui river — whose colour is said to derive from a slumbering dragon — and the wider, brown Zijiang. In 1999, the city’s population was just under half a million. From the rampart above the old city gate, one could look over an expanse of roofs whose thick gray tiles were like scales. The streets were lined with peddlers and stalls; most of the shops had roll-down shutters instead of doors. On the pavement, people washed vegetables, impaled eels on a nail, and welded engine blocks. Outside some of the restaurants there were dogs in cages that no longer bothered to bark.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/teaching_the_peoples_republic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/teaching_the_peoples_republic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is China&#8217;s bubble bursting?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/is_chinas_bubble_bursting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/is_chinas_bubble_bursting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10159733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An expert explains the bankruptcy-driven suicides in Wenzhou and the consequences of the nation\'s staggering debt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOSTON -- China's economic miracle is showing signs of faltering. Growth has slowed to 9.1 percent -- still a ferocious pace for any normal country, but a relative slump for China. Meanwhile, the government has begun putting the brakes on lending, in an effort to tame inflation and avoid a serious bubble.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a>But now there's evidence of real economic pain in China. In cities like <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/china/111020/china-economy-wenzhou-private-lending-credit">Wenzhou, entrepreneurs have found themselves mired in debt</a> -- so hopelessly that some have gone into hiding or committed suicide.</p><p>To put the matter in perspective, we interviewed Dr. Victor Shih. An expert in Chinese politics and economy, Shih has been following the debt situation closely, and was among the first to warn of potential trouble ahead. An assistant professor of political science at Northwestern University, Shih holds a Ph.D. in government from Harvard. (The interview has been condensed and edited by GlobalPost.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/is_chinas_bubble_bursting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/is_chinas_bubble_bursting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The collapse of neoliberal capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/asia_global_capitalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/asia_global_capitalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the moment, Asian economies are buoying the destructive model that's doomed the West. Will it last?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 10 years ago, before 9/11, Goldman Sachs was predicting that the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China) would make the world economy's top ten -- but not until 2040. Skip a decade and the Chinese economy already has the number two spot all to itself, Brazil is number seven, India 10, and even Russia is creeping closer. In purchasing power parity, or PPP, things look <a href="http://www.therichest.org/world/worlds-largest-economies/">even better</a>. There, China is in second place, India is now fourth, Russia sixth, and Brazil seventh.</p><p>No wonder Jim O'Neill, who coined the neologism BRIC and is now chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, has been <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/goldman-aligns-itself-against-us-uk-and-europe-alongside-china-choice-next-imf-head">stressing</a> that "the world is no longer dependent on the leadership of the U.S. and Europe." After all, since 2007, China's economy has grown by 45 percent, the American economy by less than 1 percent -- figures startling enough to make anyone take back their predictions. American anxiety and puzzlement reached new heights when the latest International Monetary Fund <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/imf-bombshell-age-of-america-about-to-end-2011-04-25">projections</a> indicated that, at least by certain measurements, the Chinese economy would overtake the U.S. by 2016. (Until recently, Goldman Sachs was pointing towards 2050 for that first-place exchange.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/asia_global_capitalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/asia_global_capitalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where have all the illegal immigrants gone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/chinese_nuts_and_mexican_immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/chinese_nuts_and_mexican_immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/07/06/chinese_nuts_and_mexican_immigration</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for American workers: Mexicans are staying home, and the Chinese are eating a lot of California nuts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Momentous news for American workers: The Chinese are <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/8bdd9c8e-a6f6-11e0-a808-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1RF1XFJNN">eating more nuts than ever,</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/07/06/world/americas/immigration.html?hp">illegal immigration into the United States</a> from Mexico is on what looks to be a long-term <em>sustainable</em> decline.</p><p>First: Mexico. Damien Cave's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/07/06/world/americas/immigration.html?hp">story in the New York Times</a> on changing trends in Mexican emigration to the United States is a true blockbuster. There are many reasons why illegal immigration into the United States is down sharply -- new punitive laws in American states, the impact of the recession on the construction business, reforms that make it easier for Mexicans to get legitimate visas, demographic changes resulting in smaller Mexican families -- but one crucial factor with enormous implications for the future is the growth and maturation of the Mexican economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/chinese_nuts_and_mexican_immigration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/chinese_nuts_and_mexican_immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim Pawlenty&#8217;s silly China envy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/tim_pawlenty_and_china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/tim_pawlenty_and_china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/06/14/tim_pawlenty_and_china</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason why the U.S. will never grow as fast as the Chinese economy is simple: We're already rich]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Pawlenty has gotten a lot of grief for his claim that a combination of tax cuts, spending cuts and reductions in regulation will spur U.S. economic growth to a decade's worth of 5 percent GDP growth. During Monday's Republican presidential candidate debate, CNN's John King pressed the former Minnesota governor for some more details:</p><blockquote> <p>CNN's John King: Governor Pawlenty, answer the critics ... who say 5 percent every year is just unrealistic ...</p> <p>Pawlenty: [T]his idea that we can't have 5 percent growth in America is hogwash. It's a defeatist attitude. If China can have 5 percent growth and Brazil can have 5 percent growth, then the United States of America can have 5 percent growth.</p> </blockquote><p>My colleague Joan Walsh memorably zinged this argument <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/2012_elections/index.html?story=/opinion/walsh/politics/2011/06/13/gop_debate_cnn">in her debate wrapup</a> by noting that the difference between China and the United States is that "they're building a middle class, not taking it apart, the way we are."</p><p>But the problems with Pawlenty's comparison go even deeper.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/tim_pawlenty_and_china/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/tim_pawlenty_and_china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood&#8217;s kowtow: &#8220;Red Dawn&#8221; dumps Chinese invaders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/red_dawn_replaces_chinese_with_north_koreans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/red_dawn_replaces_chinese_with_north_koreans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/03/16/red_dawn_replaces_chinese_with_north_koreans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A clear sign of superpower decline: Film producers swap in North Koreans as the all-purpose bad guy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stick a fork in American cultural imperialism. It's done. <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-china-red-dawn-20110316,0,995726.story">The Los Angeles Times</a> is reporting that the producers of the much-delayed and almost-certain-to-be-incredibly-awful <a href="0http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2009/12/08/red_dawn_2010">"Red Dawn" remake</a> are making a big production tweak. The Chinese invaders who had replaced the Russian invaders in the original '80s non-classic are themselves now being reconstituted as <em>North Korean</em> invaders.</p><p>The explanation for the cast transmogrification, according to reporters Ben Fritz and John Horn, comes down to simple dollars and cents. Hollywood can't afford to make the Chinese consumer angry.</p><blockquote> <p>...[P]otential distributors are nervous about becoming associated with the finished film, concerned that doing so would harm their ability to do business with the rising Asian superpower, one of the fastest-growing and potentially most lucrative markets for American movies, not to mention other U.S. products.</p> <p>As a result, the filmmakers now are digitally erasing Chinese flags and military symbols from "Red Dawn," substituting dialogue and altering the film to depict much of the invading force as being from North Korea, an isolated country where American media companies have no dollars at stake.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/red_dawn_replaces_chinese_with_north_koreans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/red_dawn_replaces_chinese_with_north_koreans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Chinese currency win for Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/a_chinese_currency_win_for_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/a_chinese_currency_win_for_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/02/14/a_chinese_currency_win_for_obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the yuan keeps hitting record highs against the dollar, good things will happen for the U.S. economy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Thursday, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/10/usa-china-currency-idUSN1028983920110210">reports Reuters,</a> "a bipartisan group of 101 U.S. lawmakers in the House of Representatives launched a new bid on Thursday to pass legislation aimed at pressuring China to let its yuan currency rise in value."</p><p>Coincidence? On that very day, the Chinese yuan hit a record high <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-02/10/c_13725382.htm">of 6.5849 against the U.S. dollar.</a> So maybe a legislative hammer won't be necessary. Indeed, according to <a href="http://www.piie.com/blogs/?p=2012">a provocative post</a> earlier last week by C. Fred Bergsten, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, there's been a real "breakthrough" on the yuan (also referred to as the renminbi) reevaulation front in recent months.</p><blockquote> <p>The nominal exchange rate of the renminbi has now appreciated by about 3.7 percent against the dollar since China announced last June that it would let the rate start moving upward again. During this same period, Chinese inflation has accelerated and is running substantially above that of the United States (which is less than 2 percent).... It is safe to say... that the real exchange rate of the renminbi has risen by at least 5 percent against the dollar over the past seven months, producing a real appreciation against the dollar at an annual rate of at least 10 percent and perhaps as much as 12 percent.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/a_chinese_currency_win_for_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/a_chinese_currency_win_for_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armageddon time again, already?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/armageddon_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/armageddon_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egyptian Protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/02/09/armageddon_again</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Egypt to China: If global warming leads to revolution, the rest of the 21st century will be a rough ride]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming, bad weather, rising food prices, massive demonstrations in the Mideast -- Paul Krugman's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/07/opinion/07krugman.html%20column">Monday New York Times column</a> provocatively connects the dots. 2010 was a year packed with <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2010/12/23/the-year-of-living-dangerously-masters-weather-extremes-climate-change/">an unusual profusion of floods,</a> droughts, mega-blizzards and heat waves -- a pattern of extreme events considered by many climate scientists to be the expected result of higher temperatures. The weather played havoc with grain harvests in Russia, Australia, China and many other regions, sharply depressing production. Global food prices consequently hit record highs in January -- fueling popular discontent in Egypt, Yemen and Tunisia.</p><blockquote> <p>...[T]he evidence does, in fact, suggest that what we're getting now is a first taste of the disruption, economic and political, that we'll face in a warming world. And given our failure to act on greenhouse gases, there will be much more, and much worse, to come.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/armageddon_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/armageddon_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Open markets lead to jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/22/us_obama_19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/22/us_obama_19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/22/us_obama_19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president espouses value of free trade]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     <object height="300" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player5x2.swf" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="bgcolor" value="282828" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://www.whitehouse.gov/xml/video/25447/config.xml&amp;path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins&amp;path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player5x2.swf" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="config=http://www.whitehouse.gov/xml/video/25447/config.xml&amp;path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins&amp;path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player5x2.swf&amp;share_url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2011/01/22/weekly-address-we-can-out-compete-any-other-nation" height="300" src="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player5x2.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></embed></object>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/22/us_obama_19/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/22/us_obama_19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marx, Engels, Mao and a brand new fridge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/checking_email_in_rural_china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/checking_email_in_rural_china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/11/19/checking_email_in_rural_china</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chinese government wanted rural farmers to buy more appliances. So let it be written, so let it be done]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PINGWEN VILLAGE, Guangxi province -- As I walked into the living room of the farmer's new house, I noticed that the floor was still wet from a recent mopping -- and I was tracking in dirt from the village outside. I was mortified. Then I learned that the farmer had only mopped the floor because she had been warned moments earlier that a visiting delegation of American journalists might be visiting her home. Even worse -- now I was embarrassed both for making her speed-clean the house <em>and</em> for messing it up.</p><p>Xu Huayan, a member of China's Zhuang minority, did not appear to mind, however. She looked just as energized by the culture shock as we were. Americans do not visit Pingwen very often -- if ever, a fact partially attested to by the Chinese journalist who was filming us for a local TV&#160;broadcast. Xu quickly urged us to sit and seemed to enjoy the semi-random questions we threw at her: <em>What crops do you grow? What programs do you watch on your TV? What do you use the Internet for?</em></p><p>(Answers: Tomatoes, weather forecasts, and information about agricultural production.)</p><p>She grew most animated when asked if she worked in the fields herself. "Of course," she exclaimed, pointing at her dark brown skin. "See my sun tan!?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/checking_email_in_rural_china/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/checking_email_in_rural_china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside China&#8217;s housing bubble</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/china_housing_bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/china_housing_bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/11/18/china_housing_bubble</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Nanning, construction is booming. But what happens when the apartments are all built?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NANNING, Guangxi Province -- If China, as no shortage of prophets of doom will argue, is in the middle of a runaway property bubble destined inevitably for a ruinous explosion, then the southern city of Nanning might be one of the first places where the carnage hits. Guangxi, located just north of Vietnam, has historically been one of China's poorest provinces. According to locals, the construction boom that started sweeping through China's eastern coastal regions decades ago only began to take off here in 2004.</p><p>But take off it did. Nanning is in the middle of a building frenzy that beggars description. New and half-finished apartment buildings rise everywhere -- the horizon is dotted with construction cranes in every direction. Traffic on the streets appears primarily divided between swarms of motorbikes and trucks carrying construction materials to and fro. The urban center of Nanning boasts a population of around 2.5 million, but seems to be preparing for an influx twice that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/china_housing_bubble/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/china_housing_bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G-20 report: Let loose the dogs of currency war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/g_20_obama_and_china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/g_20_obama_and_china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/11/10/g_20_obama_and_china</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Federal Reserve challenges China, President Obama pleads for global cooperation. But no one is listening]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As representatives of the world's richest nations prepare to wrestle through their economic disagreements in Seoul, Korea, this week, President Obama, once again, is trying <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/11/business/global/11group.html?hp">to act as a peacemaker.</a> But he will not succeed, in part because U.S. economic policy is fundamentally, and probably purposefully, disruptive toward the global economic status quo.</p><p>The New York Times:</p><blockquote> <p>In a letter to other leaders of the Group of 20 economic powers, released shortly after he arrived here, Mr. Obama tried to calm the currency tensions that have roiled global economic relations, though he did not mention by name the two most prominent sources of the tension: China's foreign-exchange interventions and the Federal Reserve's recent decision to inject $600 billion into the economy</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/g_20_obama_and_china/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/g_20_obama_and_china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the World Works goes to China</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/08/mayor_bloomberg_china_and_me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/08/mayor_bloomberg_china_and_me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/11/08/mayor_bloomberg_china_and_me</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayor Mike Bloomberg says Americans don't even know "what China is." So let's find out!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rang the buzzer at the door to the Chinese consulate in San Francisco. A woman's voice answered.</p><p>"<em>Wei</em>?"</p><p>I should have been expecting it, but the sound of that Chinese interrogative -- roughly similar to a Westerner answering a phone with the word "Hello" -- sent a surprising shock through my system. I was standing on Laguna Street in San Francisco, just outside the neighborhood known as Japan Town, but I was also suddenly transported back 25 years, to a time when I lived in Asia -- when <em>I</em> would automatically answer the phone by saying "Wei."</p><p>Just one word, and the reality of my imminent trip to China sank in with a vengeance. On Saturday, I will fly to Beijing for a ten-day visit to the People's Republic, my first journey back to Asia in 16 years. For far too long I've been inhabiting an imaginary China assembled from other people's blog posts and eyewitness reports, from the economic data points and trade war animosities left behind by the tides of globalization. Now, finally, I'm going to smell the smog, ride the high-speed trains, unlimber my sadly rusty Mandarin skills, and see for myself what China is all about in the year 2010.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/08/mayor_bloomberg_china_and_me/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/08/mayor_bloomberg_china_and_me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smug future-Chinese will own us, attack ad claims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/scary_china_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/scary_china_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/22/scary_china_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citizens Against Government Waste warns of a day when communist college students mock us for stimulus spending]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you scared of Red China? "Citizens Against Government Waste" wants you to be! And not just scared -- they want you to be pissed off at how <em>smug</em> those stupid Chinese are. Just look at them laughing at us, with their douchey headset mics, in this new campaign ad: <object height="390" style="height: 390px; width: 640px" width="640"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OTSQozWP-rM?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OTSQozWP-rM?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object></p><p>Stupid future-Chinese people owning us! If only we hadn't attempted stimulus spending -- we could've been as prosperous and successful as the communist nation that spent vast sums of money on massive infrastructure projects <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-26/china-stimulus-plan-report-is-doubted-by-economists-update1-.html">as part of their $586 billion stimulus.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/scary_china_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/scary_china_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China raises interest rates; world shudders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/china_interest_rate_hike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/china_interest_rate_hike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/10/19/china_interest_rate_hike</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Krugman's "rogue economic nation" goes its own way again. But does that really make the world worse off?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China's <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fe083ade-db6e-11df-ae99-00144feabdc0.html">"shock"</a> decision to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2010/10/19/business/business-us-china-economy.html">raise interest rates</a> by a quarter of a percentage point on Tuesday jolted world financial markets. Oil prices and stock markets fell, on the expectation that China's move would impede domestic economic growth, thus decreasing that nation's demand for commodities and possibly placing a drag on the larger global economy.</p><p>China's reasons for the move are clear: After successfully emerging from the global recession through the combined powers of a huge stimulus and an artificially weak currency, China's economy has been growing like gangbusters, and inflation is on the rise. U.S. and European central bankers would likely do the exact same thing if faced with a similar inflationary push. But China is also determined to be aggressively proactive in avoiding a potential crash. In recent months, China's leaders taken strong measures to quash the kind of disastrous property bubble that blew up the U.S. economy</p><p>     <a href="http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ajo0WRZR5lM0&amp;pos=4">From Bloomberg:</a>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/china_interest_rate_hike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/china_interest_rate_hike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Chinese New Deal for the United States</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/14/a_chinese_new_deal_for_the_united_states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/14/a_chinese_new_deal_for_the_united_states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/10/14/a_chinese_new_deal_for_the_united_states</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to prevent a trade war: The U.S. needs infrastructure, China's got cash. Put the two together!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mpettis.com/about/">Michael Pettis,</a> a finance professor at Peking University's Guanghua School of Management who has been writing cogently about the Chinese economy for years, thinks he has a way to avoid the coming trade war between the U.S. and China: <a href="http://mpettis.com/2010/10/xin-fa%E2%80%99an-a-modest-proposal-to-resolve-the-coming-trade-war/">A New Deal for the U.S., paid for and implemented directly by the Chinese.</a></p><p>The U.S. sorely needs tons of infrastructure upgrades. China has tons of cash -- not to mention experience in getting big infrastructural projects up and running.</p><blockquote> <p>So why not have China do it directly? Let China engage in a massive rebuilding of U.S. infrastructure -- it can build airports, highways, dams, and railways -- which would raise investment levels enough keep the U.S. trade deficit high in a way that benefits the U.S. and China.</p> <p>Of course China would also have the right to charge for the use of these projects so that it can earn a positive return on its investment. The return doesn't even need to be high -- just better than the return it gets on its huge expansion in investment in China, which I suspect is negative for the country as a whole....</p> <p>As long as it earns more than it earns on its USG bond holdings, it will be better off economically even without considering the immense advantage of keeping the U.S. trade deficit high for the eight to ten years China is going to need to rebalance its economy away from its toxic over-reliance for growth on the trade surplus and economically non-viable investment.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/14/a_chinese_new_deal_for_the_united_states/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/14/a_chinese_new_deal_for_the_united_states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bankruptcy of New Democrat ideology</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/12/matt_miller_michael_lind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/12/matt_miller_michael_lind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/10/12/matt_miller_michael_lind</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Washington Post columnist and radio host pretends that liberals are choosing "American people" over "people"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are critics of the Chinese dictatorship&#8217;s mercantilist trade strategy the unwitting enemies of the poor people of the world? Are multinational corporations that transfer production from unionized American workplaces to a low-wage country where independent unions are illegal and dissident democrats like Liu Xiaobao and his wife are jailed the true benefactors of humanity? The answer is yes, according to Matt Miller, a veteran of the Clinton administration who is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a columnist for the Washington Post and the host of the public radio show "Left, Right and Center." Miller, who at different times describes himself as a centrist or a progressive, wrote <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/06/AR2010100603228.html">an Op-Ed for the Post</a> last week titled "Liberalism&#8217;s moral crisis on trade."&#160;</p><blockquote> <p>Here's my question for American progressives: If you're for the little guy, are you just for American little guys? Or are you for poor underdogs even if they happen to have been born in India or China?</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/12/matt_miller_michael_lind/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/12/matt_miller_michael_lind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress to China: Let the trade wars begin!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/let_the_trade_wars_begin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/let_the_trade_wars_begin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/09/29/let_the_trade_wars_begin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House passes a bill taking aim at Chinese currency manipulation. This could get interesting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By a vote of 348-79, the U.S. House of Representatives passed <a href="http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ayEF5H9t7urc&amp;pos=8">the "Currency Reform for Fair Trade Act"</a> on Wednesday afternoon, a bill that threatens trade sanctions against China if the country does not sharply revalue its currency upward. But here's something that Republicans and Democrats itching to start slapping tariffs on Chinese imports might want to consider: <a href="http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=108&amp;subid=900003&amp;contentid=255193">Exports of made-in-the-USA cars to China are suddenly booming.</a></p><p>The growth is rather extraordinary, even if starting from a small base. From January to July 2009, U.S. auto manufacturers exported 8,847 cars to China. In 2010 the total was 56,597. Granted, the first six months of 2009 was a grim time for economies across the world, but 10 years ago, U.S. carmakers exported only 215 cars to China for the entire year 2000. The Chinese consumer market is gaining momentum, and that could be a very, very good thing for the U.S. economy.</p><p>Unless, of course, U.S. frustration with China's artificially maintained cheap yuan boils over into a full-fledged trade war, with tariff barriers rising on both sides, to the potential detriment of both economies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/let_the_trade_wars_begin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/let_the_trade_wars_begin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How G.M. helped China to world magnet domination</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/31/china_neodymium_domination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/31/china_neodymium_domination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rare earth elements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/08/31/china_neodymium_domination</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To get a piece of the Chinese market, the automaker sacrificed important technology and American jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can't get enough of those <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/08/30/rare_earth_elements_and_china/index.html">rare earth elements!</a> David Cay Johnston, former New York Times reporter and ace exposer of tax law shenanigans, writes in to remind HTWW that chapter four of his book, <a href="http://www.freelunchthebook.com/">"Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (And Stick You With The Bill),"</a> includes the interesting, if disturbing, story about how China ended up with a monopoly on the neodymium-boron magnet industry.</p><p>(Readers will recall that neodymium is one of the rare earth elements that the United States no longer has the capacity to process. Neodymium magnets are used in computer hard drives, smart bombs, wind turbines, and hybrid car engines.)</p><p>Once upon a time, the U.S. <em>did</em> make neodymium magnets. A subsidiary of General Motors called Magnequench pumped them out, and employed 260 people to do so.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/31/china_neodymium_domination/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/31/china_neodymium_domination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
