<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Christine O'Donnell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/christine_odonnell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell, Bachmann, Palin failures point to growing crazy fatigue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exploitation of liberal-scaring culture war heroines growing less profitable every day]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberal media will never lose their obsession with the photogenic crazies of the conservative movement, but there are a few hints (enough for a trend piece) that the public at large is getting a bit sick of them. (The outlier is Rick Perry's poll numbers.)</p><p>The Newsweek Michele Bachman cover <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/controversy-selling-tina-brown-134479">posted newsstand sales no higher than most other Newsweek covers</a>. The <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist">"crazy eyes" cover</a> moved 47,225 copies, according to Newsweek, though AdWeek says other industry sources say it sold somewhere between 35,000 and 48,000. Is that good? Well, "the magazine's single copy sales averaged 46,561 per issue in the first half of 2011."</p><p>We are talking only about newsstand sales, not total circulation, but this does mean that Bachmann's incredibly controversial and very buzzy crazy eyes did not "move the needle," as annoying people say. Of course, the actual <em>article</em> about Bachmann, inside of the eye-grabbing cover, <a href="salon.com/politics/war_room/2011/08/08/bachmann_theocrat_nyer/">was pretty bland.</a> But since when does the quality of the journalism have anything to do with newsstand sales?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell just walked off CNN because she was running late</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus, the book-promoting election loser calls the president "a strapping young man"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems pretty obvious that Christine O'Donnell "walking off" that CNN show hosted by the oleaginous talent show judge and former phone-hacker <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2011/0818/Did-Christine-O-Donnell-plan-to-walk-off-Piers-Morgan-VIDEO">was a put-on, right?</a> Not like it was "scripted," per se, but it certainly wasn't a spontaneous decision inspired by a particularly outrageous line of questioning. Anyone can come up with something anodyne and vague to say about gay marriage -- the president does it all the time! -- if one doesn't feel like offering a decisive opinion. So Christine O'Donnell obviously left for other reasons. Publicity for her book? In part, probably. But was she also just ... late for another appointment?</p><p>That's what she told the crowd assembled at Women's National Republican Club in New York, where she was apparently booked to speak at the same time that she was booked to be interviewed on cable news by that guy from "The Apprentice." <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/christine-odonnell-on-her-piers-morgan-walk-out-hes-looking-for-ratings/">The New York Observer was there:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Christine O&#8217;Donnell regrets her witch comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not because she is witch, but because it was a bad political move]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the more entertaining Senate races of 2010 involved conservative activist Christine O'Donnell, who won a startling Republican primary victory in Delaware over the party establishment's candidate, then-Rep. Michael Castle.</p><p>During the ensuing general election campaign, a video from 1999 emerged in which O'Donnell told Bill Maher that she "dabbled" in witchcraft in her youth. The Tea Party candidate, fearing that this might alientate her Christian support base, quickly released a video in which she stated, "I'm not a witch." The comment invited a wealth of media mockery (and an SNL spoof -- see below).</p><p>In her new memoir, "Troublemaker: Let&#8217;s Do What It Takes to Make America Great Again," O'Donnell expresses regret over the video. According to the AP, she writes, "It was a wrong-headed move, made for all the wrong reasons, but it was mine." O'Donnell also blames an insistent media consultant for pushing the idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell and other politicians we&#8217;d love to see on &#8220;Dancing With the Stars&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing With the Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delaware's favorite sorcerer is being courted by ABC's hit show. But we have five better candidates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Dancing With the Stars" is doing the two-step into the political arena again by inviting former senate candidate and witchcraft-dabbler <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20018526-503544.html">Christine O'Donnell onto their show</a>. Last season they had Bristol Palin, who <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89yiGsd2ARA">began her routine by wearing an outfit resembling her mother's</a>, only to whip it off to reveal a slinky red number, so of course, the producers had to top that with someone equally outrageous. But Christine says she won't be riding in on a broomstick anytime soon, <em>if</em> she decides to go on the show. She's <span style="text-decoration: underline;">asked the good people of</span> <a href="http://www.facebook.com/supportchristine?v=wall#!/supportchristine/posts/10150110604247376">Facebook</a> to weigh in:</p><blockquote>
<p>Although I am utterly flattered, my initial thought was to decline, as 2 year old nephew has more rhythm than me, and my two left feet!!</p>
<p>However Eileen thinks i should do it.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
</blockquote><p>Oh come <em>on,</em> Christine, we know you want to. In the off-chance she declines, though, we've thought of five more political figures who might take her place:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell under investigation for campaign money misuse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If she's you, you might go to jail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone everywhere knows that Christine O'Donnell, non-witch and failed Senate candidate from Delaware, used her campaign money to pay her rent. <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/From-the-Wires/2010/0921/Christine-O-Donnell-OK-to-use-20-000-in-campaign-funds-to-pay-her-rent">She admitted it, during the campaign.</a> Now the FBI <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101229/ap_on_re_us/us_o_donnell_investigation">has opened a criminal investigation</a>, presumably because ACORN told them to, and Barack Obama's Justice Department is always persecuting the Tea Parties, and never the New Black Panthers.</p><p>Two federal prosecutors and two FBI agents are conducting the investigation, though I can help them out a little bit: Christine O'Donnell violated the law against using campaign funds for personal use. Done!</p><p>(Wonkette's Jack Steuf <a href="http://wonkette.com/433704/fbi">wins the headline contest for this story,</a> by the way.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds probe O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s spending</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tea Party candidate investigated for using campaign money to pay personal expenses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A person with knowledge of a federal campaign-finance investigation says a criminal probe has been opened into whether Delaware Republican Christine O'Donnell broke the law by using campaign money to pay personal expenses.</p><p>The person spoke on condition of anonymity to protect the identity of a client who has been questioned in the probe. The case, which has been assigned to two federal prosecutors and two FBI agents in Delaware, has not been brought before a grand jury.</p><p>O'Donnell, who set a state record by raising more than $7.3 million in an unsuccessful U.S. Senate campaign this year, has been dogged by questions about her finances.</p><p>Her former campaign manager did not immediately respond Wednesday to questions.</p><p>------</p><p>Barakat reported from McLean, Va.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin chose football over campaigning for Christine O&#8217;Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's running for president, sure, but that doesn't mean she needs to do anything for the candidates she endorses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Sunday's New York Times Magazine <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/magazine/21palin-t.html?pagewanted=all">introduces Sarah Palin's inner circle of advisors and aides.</a> Long story short, she's obviously running for president but she's also obviously not disciplined enough to mount a serious campaign. I'm seeing visions of the hilarious, aborted Giuliani campaign -- though I guess she could semi-accidentally back into the nomination if GOP voters reject everyone else.</p><p>Her 2010 endorsements basically show how slapdash the effort will be. She hates Lisa Murkowski, so she endorses a nutty primary opponent -- who wins, then loses embarrassingly, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/10/05/todd_palin_email">meanwhile someone leaks cranky e-mails from Todd Palin to the press</a>. She endorses Christine O'Donnell for basically no good reason, then does nothing much to help that poor woman once it's apparent that she's a lost cause and a flake.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m inspired by the midterm election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/11/04/lamott_victories_of_2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell is gone, and Harry Reid isn't. Now, let's buckle up for the bumpy ride that faces us in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am awash in the afterglow of the midterms.</p><p>Perhaps "afterglow" is not exactly right. Or "awash."</p><p>Maybe I mean "profound relief." Barbara Boxer and Jerry Brown, and Michael Bennet (amazingly) in Colorado, Patty Murray hanging on, and most of all, Harry Reid, HAR-RY, HAR-RY, HAR-RY. My man. Dawg! For me, holding the Senate and Harry Reid is almost up there with the Giants winning.</p><p>So maybe they have the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/10/18/rand_paul_debate_aqua_buddha">Aqua Buddha</a>, but we have two months to go with this House, this Senate, this president. People say that 10 days or two weeks is an eternity in politics, so two months is four or five eternities. Two months is eternity-plus-plus.</p><p>And that Obama is nothing if not brilliant. This guy has had some liberal victories legislatively, and when word of these victories -- the realities of healthcare, financial reform, student loan reform, etc. -- trickles out, we will have pride and stamina again. We will experience grace again, the grace of generosity to the underdog; the grace of second winds, and psychic WD-40. The grace of unseen water wings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Tea Party cost Republicans the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/tea_party_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/tea_party_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/03/tea_party</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tea Partiers said they'd rather nominate "pure" candidates than electable ones. And they proved it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Justin Elliott <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2010_elections/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/11/03/senate_races_still_uncalled">just noted</a>, results are still outstanding in three Senate contests, but it seems likely that Democrats will end up with 53 seats -- a loss of six from their pre-election total. As rough as this is for Democrats, it could have been much, much worse. That it isn't is entirely the result of the Tea Party.</p><p>Take Delaware, where Christine O'Donnell, previously a political gadfly who had attracted little support in two other campaigns for statewide office, was propelled by Tea Party fervor to the Republican Senate nomination. The candidate she defeated, Rep. Mike Castle, had been considered a shoo-in -- by political observers, by the Republican establishment, and even by the Democratic establishment (which decided not to put much effort into the contest after Castle emerged as the likely GOP nominee -- and led Chris Coons, the unknown Democrat who claimed his party's nomination by default, by double-digits all year. Until O'Donnell emerged from nowhere to win the September 14 primary over Castle, every Senate projection map listed Delaware as a bankable pick-up for the GOP.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/tea_party_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/tea_party_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party has now officially cost GOP a Senate seat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/odonnell_delaware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/odonnell_delaware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/02/odonnell_delaware</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when Joe Biden's old Delaware seat was supposed to be an automatic pick-up for Republicans?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what else happens tonight, you can't say the GOP&#160;didn't pay a price for the restiveness of its Tea Party base: Christine O'Donnell has officially lost her U.S. Senate bid in Delaware.</p><p>It took news organizations all of a few seconds after the official 8pm closing of Delaware's poll to make the call, which was hardly a surprise, given that O'Donnell trailed Democrat Chris Coons by double-digits in every survey conducted during the general election campaign. Still, her defeat is a vivid reminder of how the Tea Party has complicated things for the GOP&#160;in this election. Because of her ideological purity, the Tea Party base insisted on nominating O'Donnell, disregarding cries from party regulars that Rep.&#160;Mike Castle -- who consistently led Coons by double-digits all year -- would guarantee a win for the party in the fall. To the base, rolling the dice with O'Donnell was something of a badge of honor, a statement that they'd rather stick to their principles and lose than compromise and win.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/odonnell_delaware/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/odonnell_delaware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell wants to help kill the START treaty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's the only Republican candidate who wants to serve on the unlucrative Senate Foreign Relations Committee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Christine O'Donnell is a clown -- and, furthermore, I know that reporters and liberal bloggers fixate on her because it's easier to laugh at this clown than to worry about the clowns who will <em>actually win today</em> -- <a href="http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/11/02/big_changes_coming_post_election_to_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee">but I was sort of surprised to see this:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>GOP Senate candidates have largely focused on domestic matters during their campaigns, and only Delaware GOP candidate Christine O'Donnell, who is not expected to win, has expressed a desire to join [the Senate Foreign Relations Committee].</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best of Taiwanese animated midterm coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weird and wonderful digital videos starring everyone from Jon Stewart to Carl Paladino]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Election Day is finally in sight, you may be in the mood for a quick recap of the most memorable moments from this year's campaigns. And there's plenty of that out there. But today, we're pointing you in the direction of some of the liveliest and (literally) most animated reporting we've seen ... and it comes from Taiwan.</p><p>So sit back and enjoy the following highlights from legendary Taiwanese CGI group <a href="http://www.nma.tv/">NMA</a>'s 2010 election coverage. Watch out for clever references to everything from <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/10/18/rand_paul_debate_aqua_buddha/index.html">Aqua Buddha</a> and Carl Paladino's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/14/carl-paladino-porn-emails_n_763209.html">bad e-mail habits</a> to Sharron Angle's <a href="http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-19/news/24141615_1_latino-high-school-students-hispanic-kids-campaign-trail">confusion</a> over whether Latino students were also Asian. (Two videos are available only via link, and the last three videos, sadly, seem only to be available without English subtitles -- but in an odd way, maybe that makes them more fun?)</p><p>&#160;<strong>1. Delaware:&#160;Christine O'Donnell</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another treasurer leaves O&#8217;Donnell campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frequent turnover could raise questions at the Federal Election Commission about her financial reporting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delaware Republican Christine O'Donnell has parted ways with yet another campaign treasurer and appointed her campaign manager as her fifth treasurer since launching her bid for Senate last year.</p><p>Campaign finance experts say the turnover is unusual and could raise questions at the Federal Election Commission about her financial reporting. O'Donnell began with relatively small donations but has been taking in nearly $1 million a week after winning the GOP primary last month.</p><p>The latest treasurer to leave is Sandra Taylor, who began just two months ago. Campaign manager Matt Moran is now listed as treasurer in reports filed earlier this month.</p><p>Taylor could not be reached and O'Donnell's campaign did not respond to a request for comment.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) -- Despite a spate of television ads aimed at reintroducing her to voters, Republican Senate hopeful Christine O'Donnell of Delaware has failed to chip away at Democratic nominee Chris Coons' strong lead, according to a new poll. She even may be going backward.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker&#8217;s Christine O&#8217;Donnell tell-all backfires</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/christine_odonnell_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/christine_odonnell_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/10/28/christine_odonnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An anonymous source tells the piggish tale of his "one-night stand" with the candidate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hate Gawker for making me do this, but ... I'm going to have to defend Christine O'Donnell. The site just published an anonymous first-person essay with the headline <a href="http://gawker.com/5674353/i-had-a-one+night-stand-with-christine-odonnell">"I Had a One-Night Stand With Christine O'Donnell."</a> Apparently Gawker's headline writers go by a different definition of "one-night stand" than the rest of the world, though, because her anonymous lay <em>didn't actually get laid.</em> Anonymous says that three years ago O'Donnell showed up tipsy with a friend at his front door on Halloween. Then 25, he was totally weirded out by her random drop-in because he didn't know her all that well -- but that didn't stop him from dressing up in a boy scout's uniform, hitting the town and tossing back several beers with her. Eventually, she grabbed his hand, kissed him and whispered sweet nothings -- god, I'm bored to death already, aren't you?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/christine_odonnell_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/christine_odonnell_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell, Joe Miller terribly unpopular</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two former Tea Party success stories plummet in the polls]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media's relentless focus on Christine O'Donnell's general weirdness has finally paid off! She will <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2010/10/28/christine-o-donnell-surges-to-21-points-behind-chris-coons.aspx">just definitely not win her Senate race</a> against a normal human man who has never had to deny practicing the Dark Arts. So there's one Senate race the Democrats can feel really good about!</p><p>The press' heroic work revealing just how much of a huge jerk Joe Miller is has also worked like a charm: <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2010/10/28/the-incredible-shrinking-joe-miller.aspx">68% of Alaska voters have an unfavorable opinion</a> of the smoldering hearthrob with his own personal goon squad and a history of alienating his coworkers <a href="http://www.alaskadispatch.com/dispatches/politics/7301-stress-lies-and-politics-tainted-joe-millers-borough-job-records-show">with constant paranoid lying.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell drops further behind in the polls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new survey shows her Democratic opponent holding a commanding 21-point lead]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite a spate of television ads aimed at reintroducing her to voters, Republican Senate hopeful Christine O'Donnell of Delaware has failed to chip away at Democratic nominee Chris Coons' strong lead, according to a new poll. She even may be going backward.</p><p>The survey released Thursday from Fairleigh Dickinson University-PublicMind shows Coons holding a commanding 21-point lead, with 57 percent of likely voters saying they will vote for him compared to just 36 percent for O'Donnell. O'Donnell trailed by 17 points in a similar Fairleigh Dickinson poll released earlier this month.</p><p>"It would be an historic comeback for her to win on Tuesday," said Dan Cassino, a Fairleigh Dickinson political scientist.</p><p>Cassino said O'Donnell, a tea party favorite who spent years as a conservative evangelical commentator on cable television, would probably win in other states that have more social conservatives and a larger tea party presence.</p><p>"But there just aren't enough in Delaware," he said.</p><p>O'Donnell, who has raised more money than Coons, has been dogged by past television appearances in which she spoke out against masturbation, characterized homosexuality as a disorder, and acknowledged dabbling in various religions, including witchcraft as a teenager. She also has drawn criticism for her thin resume and spotty financial history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell threatens to sue station over video</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/us_delaware_senate_o_donnell_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/us_delaware_senate_o_donnell_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/27/us_delaware_senate_o_donnell_3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Campaign manager demands WDEL turn over interview footage; assumed questions would not be videotaped]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell's campaign threatened to crush a radio station with a lawsuit if it posted video of an interview with the tea party favorite on the Internet.</p><p>During the interview Tuesday on WDEL-AM, O'Donnell snapped her fingers and beckoned a spokesman to her side after the host of "The Rick Jensen Show" pressed her on how she would have handled the New Castle County budget differently from her Democratic opponent Chris Coons, who is the executive of the state's largest county.</p><p>Jensen told The Associated Press that O'Donnell said after the interview that she would sue if the video was released. O'Donnell campaign manager Matt Moran then called WDEL general manager Michael Reath, demanding the station turn over the video and threatening to crush the station with a lawsuit if it did not comply.</p><p>"He accused us of creating a story to garner ratings because we must be hurting since the (Philadelphia) Phillies were no longer on the air," Reath said, adding that Moran accused Jensen of "grandstanding."</p><p>After viewing the video, which the station provided to the campaign before posting it Tuesday night, O'Donnell's campaign attorney called WDEL's attorney and was very apologetic, Reath said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/us_delaware_senate_o_donnell_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/us_delaware_senate_o_donnell_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday link dump: A complete dying of self</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/25/monday_link_dump_19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/25/monday_link_dump_19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Ford Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/25/monday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The place where Harold Ford is always welcome, a poor defense of racial profiling, and the rancid smell of politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>The feeling of disgust <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/10/psychological-foundations-of-political-belief/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+matthewyglesias+%28Matthew+Yglesias%29">makes people more conservative, apparently.</a> (And <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/10/scratch-n-sniff-mailers-loretta-sanchez-smells-bad/65109/">speaking of!</a>)</li>
<li>Danielle Crittenden writes what Adam Serwer calls <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=10&amp;year=2010&amp;base_name=worst_defense_of_racial_profil">the worst defense of racial profiling ever.</a></li>
<li>Watch clips of Christine O'Donnell's deeply weird interview <a href="http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2010/10/25/christine-odonnell-interview-with-the-brody-file.aspx">with the Christian Broadcasting Network.</a></li>
<li>The huge deficit is so huge primarily <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/justinfox/2010/10/25/whats-really-behind-that-1-3-trillion-deficit/">because revenues have plummeted.</a> (So let's raise the Social Security retirement age!)</li>
<li>Harold Ford: Unelectable in any state but <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/78635/why-harold-ford-always-meet-the-press">always welcome on "Meet the Press."</a></li>
<li>Everyone is laughing at the Democrats because they're "scapegoating" and "playing the blame game" and using incredible spending by unaccountable outside groups as their excuse for losing an election. But <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/10/are_dems_scapegoating_outside.html?wprss=plum-line">no one is bothering to judge the claims of Democrats on their merits</a>, which is funny.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/25/monday_link_dump_19/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/25/monday_link_dump_19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell: Prayer helped me in polls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/25/us_delaware_senate_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/25/us_delaware_senate_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/25/us_delaware_senate_4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with a Christian TV network, she says campaign numbers got a boost after supporters prayed for her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delaware Republican Christine O'Donnell says prayer could be boosting support for her Senate campaign.</p><p>In an interview with Christian Broadcasting Network that aired Monday, O'Donnell said her campaign saw a spike in polling on the same day that a group of supporters prayed for her campaign. She asked people to, in her words, "pray specifically that the eyes of the voters be opened."</p><p>In the same interview, O'Donnell said she thinks she's being held to a double standard because she is a conservative woman.</p><p>Most polls show O'Donnell trailing Democrat Chris Coons by double digits. The two are vying for the Senate seat long held by Vice President Joe Biden.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/25/us_delaware_senate_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/25/us_delaware_senate_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the House, a different Tea Party effect</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/will_the_tea_party_hurt_the_gop_s_house_chances_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/will_the_tea_party_hurt_the_gop_s_house_chances_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/22/will_the_tea_party_hurt_the_gop_s_house_chances_too</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We know the Tea Party is a drag on the GOP's Senate chance. But what about the House?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <em>This originally appeared at <a href="http://plainblogaboutpolitics.blogspot.com">Jonathan Bernstein's blog</a></em>
  </p><p>I've been whining for months now about reporters failing to let us know about whether Republicans were hurting their chances in House elections by nominating fringe, inexperienced or extreme candidates. Brendan Nyhan's not a reporter, but he took a different path than I did: Instead of whining, he did the <a href="http://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/2010/10/did-the-tea-party-weaken-gop-candidate-quality.html">work</a> and compiled the data.</p><p>The result is a very important post that I'll urge you to read in full if you're interested in 2010 House elections. Short version: By one standard measure of candidate quality (previous elective office), Republicans have in fact nominated a strong field of candidates in competitive House seats. To some extent that's because amateur Tea Party candidates are generally running in safe Democratic seats that the GOP had no chance to win with any candidate, and, to some extent, it's because a fair number of candidates identified with Tea Partiers are actually experienced politicos. In other words, there are a fair number of Marco Rubios, and relatively few Christine O'Donnells in most competitive House races.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/will_the_tea_party_hurt_the_gop_s_house_chances_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/will_the_tea_party_hurt_the_gop_s_house_chances_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

