<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Christine O'Donnell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/christine_odonnell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove’s Ashley Judd problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/karl_rove%e2%80%99s_ashley_judd_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/karl_rove%e2%80%99s_ashley_judd_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caroline Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13204765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big loser of the 2012 campaign cycle is incapable of helping his party close the gender gap]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When activist and actress Ashley Judd recently announced she was mulling a run for Senate against Mitch McConnell in Kentucky, Karl Rove revealed a strategy to undermine her. It would be one he’d used before with women candidates. “We’re making fun of her,” he explained.</p><p>Give him points for honesty. The key concept behind his super PAC’s first attack ad of the new election cycle was indeed to belittle the high-profile, politically active Judd. Rove and American Crossroads GPS dropped $10,000 to “stick a pin in her balloon,” going up with a satiric Judd for Senate campaign spot that portrays her as an airhead, a “leader who knows how to follow,” and dismisses her as a silly Hollywood liberal.</p><p>Far from a unique personal shot at Judd, the attack is part of a long pattern of Rove attacking women in troubling ways rhetorically distinct from his campaigns against male candidates.</p><p>One can say that he is an equal opportunity smear artist, but there is a context and a history to Rove's anti-Judd salvo. He routinely resorts to anti-woman insults and insinuations that cut deeper than his usual attacks – characterizing women in politics as having stereotypically negative female traits (subject to hysteria, too emotional, weak and weepy, bleeding heart, flighty or frigid, and lesbian).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/karl_rove%e2%80%99s_ashley_judd_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/karl_rove%e2%80%99s_ashley_judd_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The moderate&#8217;s GOP survival guide</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/the_moderates_gop_survival_guide_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/the_moderates_gop_survival_guide_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13194987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans want to take their party back from "The Crazy." Here's how they should do it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" /></a> Karl Rove and big Republican donors are trying to rescue the GOP from more Christine "I am not a witch" O'Donnell-type embarrassments by <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/us/politics/top-gop-donors-seek-greater-say-in-senate-races.html?page">funding a new group dedicated to stopping terrible candidates from winning Republican nominations</a>. The impulse is a healthy one, but it’s going to take a lot more than some attack ads to stop extremist candidates.</p><p>After all, most of the ugly Republican candidates from the last two cycles were relatively underfunded in their primaries; a little more money thrown into the pot against them is unlikely to make a difference, and it might, as <em>Salon</em>columnist Steve Kornacki <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/could_roves_new_effort_backfire/">has argued</a>, even backfire if it winds up drawing Tea Party activists into a fight they might otherwise have ignored. At best, it will help on the margins.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/the_moderates_gop_survival_guide_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/the_moderates_gop_survival_guide_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Most Republicans believe in demonic possession</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/poll_most_republicans_believe_in_demonic_possession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/poll_most_republicans_believe_in_demonic_possession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demonic Possession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Witchcraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile, less than half think humans are responsible for climate change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Less than one week away from the election, a terrifying new poll reveals that more than two-thirds of registered Republican voters believe that people can be possessed by demons.</p><p>A staggering <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/31/scary-poll-shows-that-nearly-six-in-ten-of-voters-believe-in-demonic-possession/">68 percent of registered Republican voters</a> stated that they believe demonic possession is real. Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2012/10/16/study_shows_that_more_republicans_believe_global_warming_is_real_than_in.html">only 48 percent of self-identified Republicans believe </a>in another equally if not more scary natural phenomenon: climate change.</p><p>The poll was conducted by Public Policy Polling, touted by NPR as “one of the most prolific polling outfits in the country.”</p><p>The survey was filled with enlightening gems about how the supernatural world may affect the upcoming presidential race. Women were slightly more likely than men to believe in demonic possession, although this gender gap is not nearly as wide as that of women’s preference for Obama.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/poll_most_republicans_believe_in_demonic_possession/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/poll_most_republicans_believe_in_demonic_possession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell is mulling another Senate bid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/christine_odonnell_is_mulling_another_senate_bid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/christine_odonnell_is_mulling_another_senate_bid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Coons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13014138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She may not be a witch, but she sure is a glutton for punishment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failed Tea Party candidate and media lightning rod Christine O'Donnell says she might just run for Senate again in Delaware in 2016:</p><p>"I think I owe that to my supporters, to at least consider a run," O'Donnell told the <a href="http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/16/13897586-christine-odonnell-considering-political-comeback?lite">Delaware News Journal</a>. "People sacrificed. Not only came out of their comfort zone – sacrificed to work hard in order to win the primary. And I think that I owe it to them to give it every consideration."</p><p>After endorsing Mitt Romney last year, O'Donnell told <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/02/christine-odonnell-cpac-romney.html">New York magazine</a> in February that she might  be too busy and important to serve in a Romney administration, should he come calling. "Well, who knows," she said. "I have to continue to help Governor Romney in any way that I can. Whether or not I would actually work in the administration depends, again, on what role, on what capacity, and what else was going on in my own career at the time."</p><p>O'Donnell's been mostly out of the game since she lost to Democrat Chris Coons in 2010, but the bio on her PAC page <a href="http://christinepac.com/about-christine">describes</a> her current activities thusly: "Christine O'Donnell is a nationally recognized political commentator, marketing consultant, speaker and author.  She's been featured on the cover of Time Magazine, Newsweek Magazine and appears regularly on all the national news outlets." In other words, senator might be the only job she's qualified for.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/christine_odonnell_is_mulling_another_senate_bid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/christine_odonnell_is_mulling_another_senate_bid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell, Bachmann, Palin failures point to growing crazy fatigue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exploitation of liberal-scaring culture war heroines growing less profitable every day]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberal media will never lose their obsession with the photogenic crazies of the conservative movement, but there are a few hints (enough for a trend piece) that the public at large is getting a bit sick of them. (The outlier is Rick Perry's poll numbers.)</p><p>The Newsweek Michele Bachman cover <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/controversy-selling-tina-brown-134479">posted newsstand sales no higher than most other Newsweek covers</a>. The <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist">"crazy eyes" cover</a> moved 47,225 copies, according to Newsweek, though AdWeek says other industry sources say it sold somewhere between 35,000 and 48,000. Is that good? Well, "the magazine's single copy sales averaged 46,561 per issue in the first half of 2011."</p><p>We are talking only about newsstand sales, not total circulation, but this does mean that Bachmann's incredibly controversial and very buzzy crazy eyes did not "move the needle," as annoying people say. Of course, the actual <em>article</em> about Bachmann, inside of the eye-grabbing cover, <a href="salon.com/politics/war_room/2011/08/08/bachmann_theocrat_nyer/">was pretty bland.</a> But since when does the quality of the journalism have anything to do with newsstand sales?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell just walked off CNN because she was running late</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus, the book-promoting election loser calls the president "a strapping young man"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems pretty obvious that Christine O'Donnell "walking off" that CNN show hosted by the oleaginous talent show judge and former phone-hacker <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2011/0818/Did-Christine-O-Donnell-plan-to-walk-off-Piers-Morgan-VIDEO">was a put-on, right?</a> Not like it was "scripted," per se, but it certainly wasn't a spontaneous decision inspired by a particularly outrageous line of questioning. Anyone can come up with something anodyne and vague to say about gay marriage -- the president does it all the time! -- if one doesn't feel like offering a decisive opinion. So Christine O'Donnell obviously left for other reasons. Publicity for her book? In part, probably. But was she also just ... late for another appointment?</p><p>That's what she told the crowd assembled at Women's National Republican Club in New York, where she was apparently booked to speak at the same time that she was booked to be interviewed on cable news by that guy from "The Apprentice." <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/christine-odonnell-on-her-piers-morgan-walk-out-hes-looking-for-ratings/">The New York Observer was there:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Christine O&#8217;Donnell regrets her witch comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not because she is witch, but because it was a bad political move]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the more entertaining Senate races of 2010 involved conservative activist Christine O'Donnell, who won a startling Republican primary victory in Delaware over the party establishment's candidate, then-Rep. Michael Castle.</p><p>During the ensuing general election campaign, a video from 1999 emerged in which O'Donnell told Bill Maher that she "dabbled" in witchcraft in her youth. The Tea Party candidate, fearing that this might alientate her Christian support base, quickly released a video in which she stated, "I'm not a witch." The comment invited a wealth of media mockery (and an SNL spoof -- see below).</p><p>In her new memoir, "Troublemaker: Let&#8217;s Do What It Takes to Make America Great Again," O'Donnell expresses regret over the video. According to the AP, she writes, "It was a wrong-headed move, made for all the wrong reasons, but it was mine." O'Donnell also blames an insistent media consultant for pushing the idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell and other politicians we&#8217;d love to see on &#8220;Dancing With the Stars&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing With the Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delaware's favorite sorcerer is being courted by ABC's hit show. But we have five better candidates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Dancing With the Stars" is doing the two-step into the political arena again by inviting former senate candidate and witchcraft-dabbler <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20018526-503544.html">Christine O'Donnell onto their show</a>. Last season they had Bristol Palin, who <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89yiGsd2ARA">began her routine by wearing an outfit resembling her mother's</a>, only to whip it off to reveal a slinky red number, so of course, the producers had to top that with someone equally outrageous. But Christine says she won't be riding in on a broomstick anytime soon, <em>if</em> she decides to go on the show. She's <span style="text-decoration: underline;">asked the good people of</span> <a href="http://www.facebook.com/supportchristine?v=wall#!/supportchristine/posts/10150110604247376">Facebook</a> to weigh in:</p><blockquote> <p>Although I am utterly flattered, my initial thought was to decline, as 2 year old nephew has more rhythm than me, and my two left feet!!</p> <p>However Eileen thinks i should do it.</p> <p>What do you think?</p> </blockquote><p>Oh come <em>on,</em> Christine, we know you want to. In the off-chance she declines, though, we've thought of five more political figures who might take her place:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/christine_o_donnell_dancing_with_the_stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell under investigation for campaign money misuse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If she's you, you might go to jail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone everywhere knows that Christine O'Donnell, non-witch and failed Senate candidate from Delaware, used her campaign money to pay her rent. <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/From-the-Wires/2010/0921/Christine-O-Donnell-OK-to-use-20-000-in-campaign-funds-to-pay-her-rent">She admitted it, during the campaign.</a> Now the FBI <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101229/ap_on_re_us/us_o_donnell_investigation">has opened a criminal investigation</a>, presumably because ACORN told them to, and Barack Obama's Justice Department is always persecuting the Tea Parties, and never the New Black Panthers.</p><p>Two federal prosecutors and two FBI agents are conducting the investigation, though I can help them out a little bit: Christine O'Donnell violated the law against using campaign funds for personal use. Done!</p><p>(Wonkette's Jack Steuf <a href="http://wonkette.com/433704/fbi">wins the headline contest for this story,</a> by the way.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/odonnell_investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds probe O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s spending</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tea Party candidate investigated for using campaign money to pay personal expenses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A person with knowledge of a federal campaign-finance investigation says a criminal probe has been opened into whether Delaware Republican Christine O'Donnell broke the law by using campaign money to pay personal expenses.</p><p>The person spoke on condition of anonymity to protect the identity of a client who has been questioned in the probe. The case, which has been assigned to two federal prosecutors and two FBI agents in Delaware, has not been brought before a grand jury.</p><p>O'Donnell, who set a state record by raising more than $7.3 million in an unsuccessful U.S. Senate campaign this year, has been dogged by questions about her finances.</p><p>Her former campaign manager did not immediately respond Wednesday to questions.</p><p>------</p><p>Barakat reported from McLean, Va.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/us_o_donnell_investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin chose football over campaigning for Christine O&#8217;Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's running for president, sure, but that doesn't mean she needs to do anything for the candidates she endorses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Sunday's New York Times Magazine <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/magazine/21palin-t.html?pagewanted=all">introduces Sarah Palin's inner circle of advisors and aides.</a> Long story short, she's obviously running for president but she's also obviously not disciplined enough to mount a serious campaign. I'm seeing visions of the hilarious, aborted Giuliani campaign -- though I guess she could semi-accidentally back into the nomination if GOP voters reject everyone else.</p><p>Her 2010 endorsements basically show how slapdash the effort will be. She hates Lisa Murkowski, so she endorses a nutty primary opponent -- who wins, then loses embarrassingly, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/10/05/todd_palin_email">meanwhile someone leaks cranky e-mails from Todd Palin to the press</a>. She endorses Christine O'Donnell for basically no good reason, then does nothing much to help that poor woman once it's apparent that she's a lost cause and a flake.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/palin_odonnell_football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m inspired by the midterm election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/11/04/lamott_victories_of_2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell is gone, and Harry Reid isn't. Now, let's buckle up for the bumpy ride that faces us in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am awash in the afterglow of the midterms.</p><p>Perhaps "afterglow" is not exactly right. Or "awash."</p><p>Maybe I mean "profound relief." Barbara Boxer and Jerry Brown, and Michael Bennet (amazingly) in Colorado, Patty Murray hanging on, and most of all, Harry Reid, HAR-RY, HAR-RY, HAR-RY. My man. Dawg! For me, holding the Senate and Harry Reid is almost up there with the Giants winning.</p><p>So maybe they have the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/10/18/rand_paul_debate_aqua_buddha">Aqua Buddha</a>, but we have two months to go with this House, this Senate, this president. People say that 10 days or two weeks is an eternity in politics, so two months is four or five eternities. Two months is eternity-plus-plus.</p><p>And that Obama is nothing if not brilliant. This guy has had some liberal victories legislatively, and when word of these victories -- the realities of healthcare, financial reform, student loan reform, etc. -- trickles out, we will have pride and stamina again. We will experience grace again, the grace of generosity to the underdog; the grace of second winds, and psychic WD-40. The grace of unseen water wings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Tea Party cost Republicans the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/tea_party_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/tea_party_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/03/tea_party</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tea Partiers said they'd rather nominate "pure" candidates than electable ones. And they proved it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Justin Elliott <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2010_elections/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/11/03/senate_races_still_uncalled">just noted</a>, results are still outstanding in three Senate contests, but it seems likely that Democrats will end up with 53 seats -- a loss of six from their pre-election total. As rough as this is for Democrats, it could have been much, much worse. That it isn't is entirely the result of the Tea Party.</p><p>Take Delaware, where Christine O'Donnell, previously a political gadfly who had attracted little support in two other campaigns for statewide office, was propelled by Tea Party fervor to the Republican Senate nomination. The candidate she defeated, Rep. Mike Castle, had been considered a shoo-in -- by political observers, by the Republican establishment, and even by the Democratic establishment (which decided not to put much effort into the contest after Castle emerged as the likely GOP nominee -- and led Chris Coons, the unknown Democrat who claimed his party's nomination by default, by double-digits all year. Until O'Donnell emerged from nowhere to win the September 14 primary over Castle, every Senate projection map listed Delaware as a bankable pick-up for the GOP.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/tea_party_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/tea_party_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party has now officially cost GOP a Senate seat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/odonnell_delaware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/odonnell_delaware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/02/odonnell_delaware</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when Joe Biden's old Delaware seat was supposed to be an automatic pick-up for Republicans?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what else happens tonight, you can't say the GOP&#160;didn't pay a price for the restiveness of its Tea Party base: Christine O'Donnell has officially lost her U.S. Senate bid in Delaware.</p><p>It took news organizations all of a few seconds after the official 8pm closing of Delaware's poll to make the call, which was hardly a surprise, given that O'Donnell trailed Democrat Chris Coons by double-digits in every survey conducted during the general election campaign. Still, her defeat is a vivid reminder of how the Tea Party has complicated things for the GOP&#160;in this election. Because of her ideological purity, the Tea Party base insisted on nominating O'Donnell, disregarding cries from party regulars that Rep.&#160;Mike Castle -- who consistently led Coons by double-digits all year -- would guarantee a win for the party in the fall. To the base, rolling the dice with O'Donnell was something of a badge of honor, a statement that they'd rather stick to their principles and lose than compromise and win.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/odonnell_delaware/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/odonnell_delaware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell wants to help kill the START treaty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's the only Republican candidate who wants to serve on the unlucrative Senate Foreign Relations Committee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Christine O'Donnell is a clown -- and, furthermore, I know that reporters and liberal bloggers fixate on her because it's easier to laugh at this clown than to worry about the clowns who will <em>actually win today</em> -- <a href="http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/11/02/big_changes_coming_post_election_to_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee">but I was sort of surprised to see this:</a></p><blockquote> <p>GOP Senate candidates have largely focused on domestic matters during their campaigns, and only Delaware GOP candidate Christine O'Donnell, who is not expected to win, has expressed a desire to join [the Senate Foreign Relations Committee].</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/02/odonnell_foreign_relations_committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best of Taiwanese animated midterm coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weird and wonderful digital videos starring everyone from Jon Stewart to Carl Paladino]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Election Day is finally in sight, you may be in the mood for a quick recap of the most memorable moments from this year's campaigns. And there's plenty of that out there. But today, we're pointing you in the direction of some of the liveliest and (literally) most animated reporting we've seen ... and it comes from Taiwan.</p><p>So sit back and enjoy the following highlights from legendary Taiwanese CGI group <a href="http://www.nma.tv/">NMA</a>'s 2010 election coverage. Watch out for clever references to everything from <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/10/18/rand_paul_debate_aqua_buddha/index.html">Aqua Buddha</a> and Carl Paladino's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/14/carl-paladino-porn-emails_n_763209.html">bad e-mail habits</a> to Sharron Angle's <a href="http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-19/news/24141615_1_latino-high-school-students-hispanic-kids-campaign-trail">confusion</a> over whether Latino students were also Asian. (Two videos are available only via link, and the last three videos, sadly, seem only to be available without English subtitles -- but in an odd way, maybe that makes them more fun?)</p><p>&#160;<strong>1. Delaware:&#160;Christine O'Donnell</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/30/animated_midterm_clips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another treasurer leaves O&#8217;Donnell campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frequent turnover could raise questions at the Federal Election Commission about her financial reporting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delaware Republican Christine O'Donnell has parted ways with yet another campaign treasurer and appointed her campaign manager as her fifth treasurer since launching her bid for Senate last year.</p><p>Campaign finance experts say the turnover is unusual and could raise questions at the Federal Election Commission about her financial reporting. O'Donnell began with relatively small donations but has been taking in nearly $1 million a week after winning the GOP primary last month.</p><p>The latest treasurer to leave is Sandra Taylor, who began just two months ago. Campaign manager Matt Moran is now listed as treasurer in reports filed earlier this month.</p><p>Taylor could not be reached and O'Donnell's campaign did not respond to a request for comment.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) -- Despite a spate of television ads aimed at reintroducing her to voters, Republican Senate hopeful Christine O'Donnell of Delaware has failed to chip away at Democratic nominee Chris Coons' strong lead, according to a new poll. She even may be going backward.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker&#8217;s Christine O&#8217;Donnell tell-all backfires</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/christine_odonnell_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/christine_odonnell_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/10/28/christine_odonnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An anonymous source tells the piggish tale of his "one-night stand" with the candidate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hate Gawker for making me do this, but ... I'm going to have to defend Christine O'Donnell. The site just published an anonymous first-person essay with the headline <a href="http://gawker.com/5674353/i-had-a-one+night-stand-with-christine-odonnell">"I Had a One-Night Stand With Christine O'Donnell."</a> Apparently Gawker's headline writers go by a different definition of "one-night stand" than the rest of the world, though, because her anonymous lay <em>didn't actually get laid.</em> Anonymous says that three years ago O'Donnell showed up tipsy with a friend at his front door on Halloween. Then 25, he was totally weirded out by her random drop-in because he didn't know her all that well -- but that didn't stop him from dressing up in a boy scout's uniform, hitting the town and tossing back several beers with her. Eventually, she grabbed his hand, kissed him and whispered sweet nothings -- god, I'm bored to death already, aren't you?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/christine_odonnell_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/christine_odonnell_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell, Joe Miller terribly unpopular</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two former Tea Party success stories plummet in the polls]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media's relentless focus on Christine O'Donnell's general weirdness has finally paid off! She will <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2010/10/28/christine-o-donnell-surges-to-21-points-behind-chris-coons.aspx">just definitely not win her Senate race</a> against a normal human man who has never had to deny practicing the Dark Arts. So there's one Senate race the Democrats can feel really good about!</p><p>The press' heroic work revealing just how much of a huge jerk Joe Miller is has also worked like a charm: <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2010/10/28/the-incredible-shrinking-joe-miller.aspx">68% of Alaska voters have an unfavorable opinion</a> of the smoldering hearthrob with his own personal goon squad and a history of alienating his coworkers <a href="http://www.alaskadispatch.com/dispatches/politics/7301-stress-lies-and-politics-tainted-joe-millers-borough-job-records-show">with constant paranoid lying.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/miller_odonnell_unpopular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell drops further behind in the polls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new survey shows her Democratic opponent holding a commanding 21-point lead]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite a spate of television ads aimed at reintroducing her to voters, Republican Senate hopeful Christine O'Donnell of Delaware has failed to chip away at Democratic nominee Chris Coons' strong lead, according to a new poll. She even may be going backward.</p><p>The survey released Thursday from Fairleigh Dickinson University-PublicMind shows Coons holding a commanding 21-point lead, with 57 percent of likely voters saying they will vote for him compared to just 36 percent for O'Donnell. O'Donnell trailed by 17 points in a similar Fairleigh Dickinson poll released earlier this month.</p><p>"It would be an historic comeback for her to win on Tuesday," said Dan Cassino, a Fairleigh Dickinson political scientist.</p><p>Cassino said O'Donnell, a tea party favorite who spent years as a conservative evangelical commentator on cable television, would probably win in other states that have more social conservatives and a larger tea party presence.</p><p>"But there just aren't enough in Delaware," he said.</p><p>O'Donnell, who has raised more money than Coons, has been dogged by past television appearances in which she spoke out against masturbation, characterized homosexuality as a disorder, and acknowledged dabbling in various religions, including witchcraft as a teenager. She also has drawn criticism for her thin resume and spotty financial history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/us_delaware_senate_poll_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
