<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Christopher Hitchens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/christopher_hitchens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I knew Christopher Hitchens better than you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/i_knew_christopher_hitchens_better_than_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/i_knew_christopher_hitchens_better_than_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10697981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every writer who had a drink with Hitch has now told his story. But even Rushdie and Amis didn't know him like this]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Hitchens and I were friends for 40 years, plus another five when we were enemies. He took ideas so seriously that if he disagreed with you on a matter that he deemed important, he’d literally throw you in a ditch. It was 1972, the height of our mutual virility. He and I went to a pub to celebrate his most recent intellectual victory over the establishment press. I intimated that sometimes women could be funny on purpose. Even back then, the thought enraged him. Hitchens threw a drink in my face, pressed a lit cigarette into my neck, and hit me over the head with a barstool. The next thing I knew, it was two days later and I was lying hogtied and naked beside the M5. Hitch had already severely damaged my reputation in a vicious essay in the Guardian<em>. </em>But that’s how he operated, and that’s why we loved him.</p><p>University, as you know, is the only time in one’s life when anything really worthwhile happens. I met Hitch there. The first time I saw him, he had a bird on each arm and a woman by his side. She beamed as he read aloud passages from "Homage to Catalonia." He looked up.</p><p>“Who the hell are you?” he said.</p><p>“I’m your housemate,” I said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/i_knew_christopher_hitchens_better_than_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/i_knew_christopher_hitchens_better_than_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>142</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitchens, gossip columnist of genius</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/hitchens_gossip_columnist_of_genius/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/hitchens_gossip_columnist_of_genius/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10653001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The famed atheist and Vanity Fair writer was more concerned with self-promotion than actual ideas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“In lapidary inscriptions a man is not upon oath,” Samuel Johnson remarked. Even so, claims that the world has lost a major thinker and great writer in the late Christopher Hitchens go beyond the mild flattery that is appropriate in obituaries and call for correction. The rule <em>de mortuis nil nisi bonum</em> does not apply to those who take part in public life or public debate; their deaths provide the most appropriate occasions to evaluate their significance and their legacies.</p><p>My assessment of Christopher Hitchens is not colored by any personal conflict with him. On the contrary, my few interactions with Hitchens were friendly. In 1995 he wrote a favorable review of my first book, "The Next American Nation," in the New York Times Book Review, and thereafter invited me to drinks at a Washington bar several times. Some claim that he was a fascinating conversationalist, but as I recall he showed no interest in ideas and preferred to peddle gossip about politicians and journalists and authors, until I found opportunities to excuse myself. Gossip, like alcohol, is safely consumed only in small quantities.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/hitchens_gossip_columnist_of_genius/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/hitchens_gossip_columnist_of_genius/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The virtuoso</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/the_virtuoso/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/the_virtuoso/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10532601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens was the most gifted rhetorician of his generation. His political judgment was another story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I saw Christopher Hitchens speak was at a forum at U.C. Berkeley in 1989. I remember this somewhat disheveled Brit walking onto the stage and leaning over the lectern. There was something about him, a kind of languid, deliberate menace, that made me think of a boxer. Then he opened his mouth, and the most extraordinarily elegant invective I had ever heard flowed out. It was like watching a magician blowing a smoke ring that turned into a flock of birds – in Hitchens’ case they would be pterodactyls – that flew about in perfect formation for a while, then disappeared through the ceiling. I remember nothing about his speech except one phrase about the Bush I administration, which rolled off his tongue like a bite-size rhetorical bomb: “A Saturnalia of sycophancy and sadism.”</p><p>Any time someone who was the best at something dies, the world shrinks a little bit. It feels smaller today. One part of it especially feels smaller -- the world of words. For Christopher Hitchens was a virtuoso of language. As a baby, Mozart supposedly could tell if a violin was microscopically out of tune. I imagine Hitchens lying in his crib, wailing because his mother did not use a subordinate clause in exactly the right way to modulate to her conclusion. He was a rhetorical freak.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/the_virtuoso/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/the_virtuoso/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Hitch was wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/when_hitch_was_wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/when_hitch_was_wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10485431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was disastrously wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The late Christopher Hitchens had the professional contrarian's fixation on attacking sacred cows, and rather soon after his cancer diagnosis, he became one himself. I think he would've been disgusted to see too much worshipful treacle being written about him upon his untimely death, so let's remember that in addition to being a zingy writer and masterful debater, he was also a bellicose warmongering misogynist.</p><p>Upon the death of the unlamented Earl Butz, Hitchens <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2008/02/truth_and_consequences.html">excoriated editors who published sanitized obituaries</a> of a man remembered solely for a vulgar racist remark made in public. Hitchens leaves a rather more varied legacy, but it's just as important not to whitewash his role in recent history.</p><p>There was no more forceful intellectual voice in support of the Iraq War than Hitchens. There were others who were more prominent, more influential or more persuasive, but Hitchens was the perfect shill for an administration looking to cast its half-baked invasion plans as a morally righteous intervention, because only he could call upon a career of denunciations of totalitarianism and defenses of human rights. (The fact that the war was <em>supposed</em> to be justified by weapons Saddam was supposedly developing didn't really matter to Hitchens.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/when_hitch_was_wrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/when_hitch_was_wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>124</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitch the apostate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/hitch_the_apostate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/hitch_the_apostate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10481011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As my time with the controversial writer showed me, his true religion was the renunciation of prior belief]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was Christopher's idea to start a drinking club. We would call it the Osric Dining Society, he said, in honor of Osric, the unctuous courtier in Hamlet. He helpfully quoted several lines to illustrate the project. Hitch's purpose (besides a night of drinking on someone else's tab) was to skewer those in Washington journalism who flattered their way to the top. The year was 1986 and I knew Hitchens as a friend and columnist for the Nation magazine who lobbed corrosive broadsides at the New Republic where I worked. I thought the Osric Dining Society was a swell excuse for merriment. Anybody could attend, Hitch said, as long as they stood up to nominate one Washington journalist who excelled in what Hitch described as "the Osrician principles of flattery, deference and self-serving vacuity."</p><p>So a couple of dozen liberal writers and reporters gathered in the backroom of a Connecticut Avenue restaurant to lampoon our fellow hacks and the perennially awful state of Washington journalism. Hitch, as master of ceremonies, rose to skewer not one but a half dozen famous scribes, impugning the likes of David Broder, John McLaughlin and Fred Barnes with obscene glee. Glass of amber fluid in hand, he spun out complex and hilarious scenarios involving fellatio, barnyard animals and Morton Kondracke, and the hangover was pleasurably punishing. When I told my boss, New Republic editor Michael Kinsley, about the debauchery the next morning, he sniffed, "Oh, Sid and Hitch feeling self-satisfied again?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/hitch_the_apostate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/hitch_the_apostate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>God didn&#8217;t kill Christopher Hitchens</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/god_didnt_kill_christopher_hitchens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/god_didnt_kill_christopher_hitchens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10481271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet decides death is evidence against atheism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Hitchens, the fiery, indomitable, and highly divisive essayist and author, once declared "Vindication -- being proved repeatedly and over and over again right, when other people are wrong -- does a lot for me." And with his death Wednesday, he's proven how popular that sentiment really is. In fact, it turns out there's nothing like the death of an outspoken atheist to bring out the "told ya so" brigade of believers.</p><p>Within hours of the news of Hitchens's passing at the age of 62, the Internet was hotter than an inner circle of hell with the God squad thundering its own version of vindication.  Along with plenty of hope that he "made his peace with God," there was blowhard-for-Jesus Rick Warren tweeting that "My friend Christopher Hitchens has died. I loved &amp; prayed for him constantly &amp; grieve his loss. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/RickWarren">He knows the Truth now,"</a> while <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/24/origin_into_schools/ ">creepy creationist Ray Comfort</a> declared that the now dead "<a href="http://raycomfortfood.blogspot.com/2011/12/christopher-hitchens-is-no-longer.html http://www.edstetzer.com/2011/12/christopher-hitchens-1949-2011.html">Christopher Hitchens is no longer an atheist."</a> LifeWay's Ed Stetzer, meanwhile, blogged that "When Christopher Hitchens died, <a href="http://www.edstetzer.com/2011/12/christopher-hitchens-1949-2011.html">he entered into eternity as every man does</a>: as a beggar at the gates of the kingdom," and Southern Baptist Seminary president Albert Mohler tweeted that "The death tonight of Christopher Hitchens is an excruciating reminder of <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/albertmohler">the consequences of unbelief. </a>We can only pray others will believe." I'm not a brilliant debater like Hitchens, but let me field this one. Death is not a consequence of disbelief. It's a consequence of living, you moron.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/god_didnt_kill_christopher_hitchens/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/god_didnt_kill_christopher_hitchens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friends pay tribute to Christopher Hitchens</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/friends_pay_tribute_to_christopher_hitchens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/friends_pay_tribute_to_christopher_hitchens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I .P.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10471261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colleagues, admirers and close acquaintances of the late, celebrated writer share their thoughts online]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The death of Christopher Hitchens -- the sharp, controversial and almost unbelievably prolific journalist and commentator -- sent admirers into mourning, caused <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/156317/new-york-times-stops-the-presses-for-christopher-hitchens-obit/">the New York Times to redraw its Friday front page</a>, and inspired friends and colleagues to take to TV, radio and the Internet to express their appreciation and grief. Here are links to some of the most notable tributes we've found:</p><ul>
<li>Many of Hitchens' friends, colleagues and admirers have commented on his passing on <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2011/12/tributes_to_the_journalist_and_intellectual_from_julian_barnes_anne_applebaum_james_fenton_and_others_.html">Slate</a>. Novelist Julian Barnes <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2011/12/christopher_hitchens_death_the_novelist_julian_barnes_on_a_memorable_conversation_he_had_with_hitch_.html">recounts</a> a "cruel" but ultimately "useful" lesson from the master writer. <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2011/12/christopher_hitchens_death_james_fenton_explains_why_hitch_became_an_american_.html">James Fenton</a> reflects on "the deep significance becoming an American citizen held for [Hitchens]." ("I hadn’t realized the need Christopher felt to belong to something. He was far too satirical to show it.") Guardian columnist <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2011/12/christopher_hitchens_death_how_hitchens_infuriated_conrad_black_when_he_worked_for_a_magazine_black_owned_.html">Alexander Chancellor</a> adds: "The appeal of brilliant contrarianism knows no boundaries."</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/friends_pay_tribute_to_christopher_hitchens/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/friends_pay_tribute_to_christopher_hitchens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blair debates Hitchens on religion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/27/cn_canada_blair_hitchens_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/27/cn_canada_blair_hitchens_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/27/cn_canada_blair_hitchens_debate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Toronto, the former British leader argues with the anti-religious writer over God as a "force for good"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former British prime minister Tony Blair said Friday his religious beliefs did not play a role in his decision to support the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq during a debate about the merits of religion in Toronto.</p><p>Blair attempted to persuade his verbal sparring opponent, writer Christopher Hitchens, that religion is a force for global good when he was asked by an audience member how religion influenced his decision to stand with the United States against Iraq.</p><p>"Religion doesn't do policy. All my decisions were based on policy and so they should be, and you may disagree with those decisions but they were made because I genuinely believed them to be right," said Blair before the audience of more than 2,600 at Toronto's Roy Thompson Hall.</p><p>Blair, 57, converted to Catholicism after leaving office in 2007. Since then he has started the Tony Blair Faith Foundation to promote understanding between religions.</p><p>He faced a fierce opponent in the debating ring Friday night. Hitchens, 61, an avowed atheist, Vanity Fair columnist and author of "God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything," has been a prominent voice in attacking religion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/27/cn_canada_blair_hitchens_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/27/cn_canada_blair_hitchens_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>206</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christopher Hitchens undergoing treatment for esophageal cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/christopher_hitchens_cancer_treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/christopher_hitchens_cancer_treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/30/christopher_hitchens_cancer_treatment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controversial author and commentator cancels public appearances for new book "Hitch-22"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>British author Christopher Hitchens says he must undergo chemotherapy on his esophagus and has canceled some engagements.</p><p>The 61-year-old Hitchens, whose most recent book, "Hitch-22," is on Publishers Weekly's best-sellers list, posted a message on his publisher's website that he had been told by his doctor that he must undergo a course of chemotherapy. Hitchens expressed regret for having to cancel engagements on short notice.</p><p>His publisher issued a statement saying the author was being given his privacy during the treatments.</p><p>The author, essayist and columnist lives near DuPont Circle. He has written more than a dozen books and enjoyed surprising commercial success three years ago with "God Is Not Great," a direct attack on religion.</p><p>Online:</p><p><a href="http://www.twelvebooks.com/">http://www.twelvebooks.com/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/christopher_hitchens_cancer_treatment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/christopher_hitchens_cancer_treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neoconservatives throw an awesome cocktail party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/14/neocon_cocktail_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/14/neocon_cocktail_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/14/neocon_cocktail_party</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And you're not invited!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bashing Beltway cocktail parties always feels like a cheap shot. Do these things even actually happen? Surely, powerful people must have non-powerful friends to hang out with, instead of just hobnobbing with each other.</p><p>Then the New York Times goes and runs an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/fashion/13Party.html?pagewanted=1&amp;sq=Frum%20Hoff-Somers&amp;st=cse&amp;scp=1">urgent dispatch</a> from "a tiki-lantern-lighted backyard garden in northwest Washington." This breathless report on a fancy Washington social gathering may have appeared under the heading "The State of Conservatism," but make no mistake, it&#8217;s grade-A, uncut Style-section writing: blissfully dazzled by the bright stars, their banter, outfits, food and drink. (Poached tilefish and grilled asparagus!)</p><p>The party was in honor of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the refugee writer from Somalia, by way of Holland, who has been happily appropriated by the neoconservative right because of her hostility to the religion of her upbringing, Islam. Although she identifies as a pro-choice atheist, Hirsi Ali is a heroic figure to the clash-of-civilizations set for her militant embrace of the values of the Enlightenment. She's a foreigner who's renounced the dark ways of her homeland, and loudly declared the superiority of Western culture, at no small personal risk.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/14/neocon_cocktail_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/14/neocon_cocktail_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Hitch-22&#8243;: Christopher Hitchens&#8217; name-dropping charade</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/christopher_hitchens_hitch_22_review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/christopher_hitchens_hitch_22_review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2010/06/01/christopher_hitchens_hitch_22_review</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite same-sex titillations, "Hitch-22" is an arrogant justification of the atheist's complicity in the Iraq war]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In interviews, Christopher Hitchens -- pre-9/11 journalist and public intellectual turned celebrity journalist, TV talk show pundit and professional atheist -- is calling "<a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ISBNInquiry.asp?EAN=%209780446540339&amp;lkid=J30387533&amp;pubid=K238614">Hitch-22</a>" "a selective memoir." And while all memoirs, of course, are selective, Hitchens' is <em>really</em> selective.&#160;</p><p>The book certainly isn't an autobiography. His icon, George Orwell, said that "Autobiography is not to be trusted unless it reveals something disgraceful," and Hitchens fails to mention that his first wife was pregnant with his child when he left her. In fact, there is barely any mention of his three children, only a passing mention of his current wife, and none at all of his younger brother, Peter, a right-wing columnist in England.</p><p>If you're interested in Hitchens trivia, "Hitch 22" is loaded. The favorite "good-bad book" (to use G.K. Chesterton's phrase) of his youth was "How Green Was My Valley." He is part Jewish (on his mother's side); she wanted him to be "an English gentleman." His father, a military man, was known as "The Commander." His "literary hero" is Borges, he thinks Costa-Gavras' "Z" is "the greatest of all sixties movies."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/christopher_hitchens_hitch_22_review/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/christopher_hitchens_hitch_22_review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those ignorant atheists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/terry_eagleton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/terry_eagleton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atoms and Eden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2009/04/28/terry_eagleton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this witty book, Terry Eagleton argues that Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and their ilk are shockingly ill-informed about the Christian faith.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is how British literary critic Terry Eagleton begins his brisk, funny and challenging new book: "Religion has wrought untold misery in human affairs. For the most part, it has been a squalid tale of bigotry, superstition, wishful thinking, and oppressive ideology." That's quite a start, especially when you consider that the point of Eagleton's "Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate" -- adapted from a series of lectures he delivered at Yale in April 2008 -- is to <em>defend</em> the theory and practice of religion against its most ardent contemporary critics.</p><p>But Eagleton, a professor of English literature and cultural theory who divides his time between the University of Lancaster and the National University of Ireland, is determined not to commit the same elementary errors he ascribes to such foes as biologist Richard Dawkins and political journalist Christopher Hitchens. (Those two, collectively dubbed "Ditchkins" by Eagleton, are the self-appointed leaders of public atheism and the authors of bestselling books on the subject, Dawkins' "The God Delusion" and Hitchens' "God Is Not Great.") Atheists of the Ditchkins persuasion have raised valid points about the sordid social and political history of religion, with which Eagleton largely agrees. Yet their arguments are fatally undermined by their own unacknowledged dogmas and doctrines, he goes on to say, and they completely fail to understand Christian faith (or any other kind) except in its stupidest and most literal-minded form.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/terry_eagleton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/terry_eagleton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>594</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the U.S. a Christian nation?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/09/hitchens_blackwell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/09/hitchens_blackwell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/04/09/hitchens_blackwell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens and Ken Blackwell have a lively, if lopsided, debate over the question. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's been quite a bit of discussion about Newsweek's <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/192583">latest cover story</a>, "The Decline and Fall of Christian America," plenty of it coming from Christians who are, as you might imagine, <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/colleen-raezler/2009/04/08/media-its-un-holy-week">unhappy</a> that Newsweek would publish an article saying this.</p><p>So far, the most interesting thing to come out of all this is a debate on MSNBC's "Hardball" between writer and noted atheist Christopher Hitchens and former Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, who's now with a Christian right group, the Family Research Center. It's definitely a lopsided debate -- even if Blackwell's case was airtight, he'd stand little chance against Hitchens, who's well-versed on the subject and is <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2007/05/08/hitchens_sharpton/?source=refresh">very, very good</a> at discussing it. But it's worth watching anyway.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><div>
    <iframe frameborder="0" height="339" scrolling="no" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/30114573#30114573" width="425"></iframe>
  </div></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/09/hitchens_blackwell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/09/hitchens_blackwell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terror and loathing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/02/amis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/02/amis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/04/02/amis</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martin Amis may not know much about Islam and 9/11, but he knows what he hates.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is how <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/martin_amis/">Martin Amis,</a> in the long essay "Terror and Boredom: The Dependent Mind," at the center of his new collection of writings on <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/911/">Sept. 11</a>, describes Donald Rumsfeld's demeanor on television during the early days of the Iraq invasion: "He looked as though he had just worked his way through a snowball of cocaine. 'Stuff happens,' he said when asked about the looting of the Mesopotamian heritage in Baghdad -- the remark of a man not just corrupted but floridly vulgarized by power." And here is how Amis experienced Tony Blair's visit to the Bush White House: "The whole place fizzes with zero tolerance, with the prideful tension and frigidity of high protocol. Its peculiarly American flavor is evident in the sustained choreography and the dread of the spontaneous. This does remind you of something: a film set." </p><p> In Amis' work, lines like these are the franchise. They're the reason you buy a ticket and get on the ride. Amis himself admits as much; discussing his fiction in an interview with the Paris Review, he dismissed "story, plot, characterization, psychological insight and form" as merely "secondary interests" compared to a novelist's prose, little more than the apparatus on which to hang some bitchin' sentences. So it hardly seems an insult to say that his specialty is not substance, but style. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/02/amis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/02/amis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I don&#8217;t believe in atheists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/chris_hedges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/chris_hedges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atoms and Eden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2008/03/13/chris_hedges</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foreign correspondent and intellectual provocateur Chris Hedges explains why New Atheists like Christopher Hitchens are as dangerous as Christian fundamentalists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div><img class='wp-image-10046863' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/03/story27.jpg' /></p><p> To listen to a podcast of the interview, click <a target="new" href="http://media.salon.com/mp3s/2008/mar/conversations_hedges.mp3">here.</a></p><p> To subscribe: Click <a target="new" href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=157190082">here</a> to add Conversations to iTunes or cut and paste the URL into your podcasting software: <br> </p><p> <img class='wp-image-10046865' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/03/conversations_article2.gif' /><p>Many charges have been leveled at foreign correspondent Chris Hedges over the years, but shrinking from conflict isn't one of them. Hedges spent nearly seven years as Middle East bureau chief for the New York Times, covered the wars in Bosnia and Kosovo, and was part of the New York Times team that won the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of global terrorism. He took on the American military-industrial complex with his books "War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning" and "What Every Person Should Know About War," and provoked the rage of the Christian right by likening them to Nazis in last year's <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/01/08/fascism/"> "American Fascists."</a> Hedges now cements his reputation as an intellectual provocateur with the charmingly titled <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FDont-Believe-Atheists-Chris-Hedges%2Fdp%2F141656795X%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1205352131%26sr%3D1-4&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">"I Don't Believe in Atheists."</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/chris_hedges/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/chris_hedges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>387</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.salon.com/mp3s/2008/mar/conversations_hedges.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women ARE funny. And foxy!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/04/vanity_fair_cover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/04/vanity_fair_cover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Silverman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/04/vanity_fair_cover</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vanity Fair spotlights Tina Fey and other female comedians, and the question isn't "Why aren't women funny?" but "Why are today's funny women all so hot?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class='wp-image-10044742' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/03/funnygirls.jpg' /> </p><p>Back in January 2007, when Vanity Fair published Christopher Hitchens' irritating <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2007/01/hitchens200701">"Why Women Aren't Funny,"</a> clearly written in the depths of a Bushmills bender, the funny (ha!) thing was that female comedians were actually doing better than ever: Tina Fey was starring in the best sitcom on television after a winning tenure at "Saturday Night Live," Amy Poehler and Maya Rudolph were kicking ass on that show, Sarah Silverman had been the subject of a <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/10/24/051024fa_fact">fawning New Yorker profile</a> and was about to launch her own comedy show, etc. So it was puzzling why Hitch chose that moment to publicly perform his own verbal wedgie. Maybe it was a slow month. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/04/vanity_fair_cover/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/04/vanity_fair_cover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proud atheists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/15/pinker_goldstein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/15/pinker_goldstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atoms and Eden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/10/15/pinker_goldstein</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven Pinker and Rebecca Goldstein, America's brainiest couple, confess that belonging to one of America's most reviled subcultures doesn't mean they believe scientists can explain everything.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I've always been obsessed with the mind-body problem," says philosopher Renee Feuer Himmel. "It's the essential problem of metaphysics, about both the world out there and the world in here." </p><p>Renee is the fictional alter ego of novelist and philosopher Rebecca Goldstein. In her 1983 novel, "The Mind-Body Problem," Goldstein laid out her own metaphysical concerns, which include the mystery of consciousness and the struggle between reason and emotion. As a novelist, she's drawn to the quirky lives of scientists and philosophers. She's also fascinated by history's great rationalist thinkers. She's written nonfiction accounts of the 17th-century Jewish philosopher <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/review/2006/05/17/goldstein/">Baruch Spinoza</a> and the 20th-century mathematician-philosopher <a href="http://dir.salon.com/books/review/2005/03/23/goldstein/index.html">Kurt G&ouml;del.</a> </p><p>Perhaps it's not surprising that Goldstein would end up living with Steven Pinker, a leading theorist of the mind. He's a cognitive psychologist at Harvard; she's a philosopher who's taught at several colleges. Although they come out of different disciplines, they mine much of the same territory: language, consciousness, and the tension between science and religion. If Boston is ground zero for intellectuals, then Pinker and Goldstein must rank as one of America's brainiest power couples. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/10/15/pinker_goldstein/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/15/pinker_goldstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>234</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did Al Sharpton really mean?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/11/sharpton_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/11/sharpton_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/news/politics//2007/05/11/sharpton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The minister is under fire for allegedly bigoted remarks against former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. But it's not entirely clear he meant them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like the Don Imus affair in reverse. The Rev. <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/al_sharpton/">Al Sharpton,</a> one of the driving forces behind the controversial radio host's recent firing for making racist comments, is now under attack himself for allegedly making bigoted comments about former Massachusetts Gov. and current Republican presidential candidate <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/mitt_romney/">Mitt Romney.</a> According to cable news, right-wing blogs and the Romney campaign, in a debate over the existence of God with <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/christopher_hitchens/">Christopher Hitchens</a> in New York on Monday night, Sharpton denigrated Romney's Mormon faith. </p><p>Out of context and reduced to a single, printed quote, Sharpton's words -- "And as for the one Mormon running for office, those that really believe in God will defeat him anyway, so don't worry about that" -- do make him sound like a religious bigot. But to someone who was actually listening in person at the New York Public Library on Monday night -- like, say, <i>me</i> -- Sharpton's words sounded very different. As I heard him speak it never occurred to me that he intended anything defamatory toward the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/11/sharpton_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/11/sharpton_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>God grief</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/10/hitchens_god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/10/hitchens_god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2007/05/10/hitchens_god</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens has attacked modern-day saints like Mother Teresa and Princess Di, but his new book takes aim at the most sacred cow of all: The Almighty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> For a while back there it seemed as though we had <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/god/index.html">God</a> on the ropes. Copernicanism. The Enlightenment. The theory of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/evolution/index.html">evolution.</a> These, surely, must have stung. As early as 1887, impatient to call the victory for secularism, Nietzsche proclaimed: "Belief in God has been overturned, belief in the Christian-ascetic ideal is even now fighting its last fight." It was Nietzsche who performed the definitive intellectual castration, generously conceding: "It is true, there could be a metaphysical world; the absolute possibility of it is hardly to be disputed ... but one can do absolutely nothing with it, not to speak of letting happiness, salvation and life depend on the gossamer of such a possibility." </p><p> How is it, then, that at the dawn of the third millennium, this maligned and disenfranchised neuter soldiers on, ordering his followers to murder <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/abortion/index.html">abortionists,</a> block stem-cell research, and fly planes into buildings? As atheists the nation over will inform you, 91 percent of American adults believe in God. (A vertiginously high 79 percent believe in angels.) Like Michael Myers in "Halloween," the tenacious old codger simply refuses to die, thereby condemning us to an infinity of blandly gruesome sequels. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/10/hitchens_god/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/10/hitchens_god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>174</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christopher Hitchens, Al Sharpton and God</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/08/hitchens_sharpton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/08/hitchens_sharpton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2007/05/08/hitchens_sharpton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two firebrands meet to debate religion, the idea of God and Hitchens' new book.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rev. <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/al_sharpton/">Al Sharpton</a> observed at his debate with writer <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/christopher_hitchens/">Christopher Hitchens</a> Monday night that it was perhaps the first time, he, Sharpton, was put in a position in which, at the start of the debate, he was not assumed to be the devil. Last night, Sharpton was on God's debating team -- and still he managed to be on the less popular side. </p><p>Sharpton was a late addition to what was originally supposed to be a forum that featured just Hitchens, whose new book, "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/God-Not-Great-Religion-Everything/dp/0446579807/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-4574773-1639015?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1178646652&sr=8-1">God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything,</a>" was the focus of the debate, which took place in front of a sellout crowd at the New York Public Library. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/08/hitchens_sharpton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/08/hitchens_sharpton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

