<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/chuck_schumer_d_ny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Schumer claims progress in late-night budget talks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/schumer_budget_showdown_progress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/schumer_budget_showdown_progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/06/schumer_budget_showdown_progress</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[N.Y. senator says Tea Party to blame if government shuts down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate's third ranking Democrat says there's "a glimmer of hope" in talks to resolve a budget stalemate.</p><p>But at the same time, Sen. Chuck Schumer says the tea party will be to blame if negotiations fail and a government shutdown happens.</p><p>Schumer tells network interviewers he believes Republicans, driven by tea party supporters, are being unreasonable in the particular areas of federal spending that they want to cut. The New York senator tells NBC's "Today" show Wednesday that tea party-backed GOP lawmakers have demanded the cuts "be in a very small portion of the budget," such as student aid, scientific research and public broadcasting. But he also says "some progress was made" in talks on Capitol Hill late Tuesday night between House Republicans and Senate Democrats.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/schumer_budget_showdown_progress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/schumer_budget_showdown_progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chuck Schumer inadvertently reveals spin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/schumer_extreme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/schumer_extreme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/29/schumer_extreme</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With reporters listening, the New York senator mistakenly tells his colleagues which talking point to use]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Chuck Schumer, loudmouthed New York Democrat and incorrigible publicity hound, accidentally revealed his super-top-secret talking points to a bunch of reporters while he was... <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/on-a-senate-call-a-glimpse-of-marching-orders/">on a conference call with a bunch of reporters</a>. Before the call was scheduled to begin, Schumer was instructing his fellow senators on what to say to the press, which I'm sure his fellow senators really appreciated, because they totally have no idea how to competently deliver simple talking points to reporters:</p><blockquote>
<p>After thanking his colleagues &#8212; Barbara Boxer of California, Ben Cardin of Maryland, Tom Carper of Delaware and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut &#8212; for doing the budget bidding for the Senate Democrats, who are facing off against the House Republicans over how spending for the rest of the fiscal year, Mr. Schumer told them to portray John Boehner of Ohio, the Speaker of the House, as painted into a box by the Tea Party, and to decry the spending cuts that he wants as extreme. &#8220;I always use the word extreme,&#8221; Mr. Schumer said, &#8220;That is what the caucus instructed me to use this week.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/schumer_extreme/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/schumer_extreme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate rules reform won&#8217;t happen</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Udall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A month after every Democrat signaled support for changes to the cloture rule, everyone gives up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reasonable and popular measure with the support of a majority of senators has quietly died for no good reason, and the Senate's very first official legislative "day" of the new Congress has not even finished yet. (Did you know that the Senate's been in the middle of this one legislative day since Jan. 5? It's true!) This time, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/22/AR2011012203920.html">the victim was Senate rules reform</a>, because an attempt to deal with the unintended consequences of the previous stab at rules reform was deemed to be a violation of the rights of the minority as not at all enshrined in the Constitution, which doesn't mention filibusters.</p><p>It is actually amazing how quickly this collapsed. <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/82031/senate-dems-throw-in-the-towel">One month ago every single Senate Democrat signed a letter in support of</a> reforms of the cloture rule. Tom Udall's proposal would not have even killed the filibuster; it would've just forced 40 members to stay on the floor to sustain it, instead of one guy declaring filibuster and everyone pacing for 30 hours.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday link dump: The yellow brick road</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/friday_link_dump_20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/friday_link_dump_20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/10/friday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Paul's priorities, Chuck Schumer's political cunning, and your Bernie Sanders questions answered]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Elected Republicans <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/12/the-institutional-feebleness-of-moderate-republicanism/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+matthewyglesias+%28Matthew+Yglesias%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">are much more conservative than the people who vote for them.</a></li>
<li>Chuck Schumer successfully <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/10/thanks-to-chuck-schumer-n_n_794951.html">got his name in newspapers today.</a></li>
<li>Ron Paul can't wait <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/12/back-to-the-gold-standard/67827/">to get us back to the gold standard.</a></li>
<li>John Bolton <a href="http://wonkette.com/432138/john-bolton-has-an-opinon-about-wikileaks-barack-obama-sucks">has opinions about WikiLeaks.</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/12/an-unfortunate-decision-by-peter-orszag/67822/">On Peter Orszag's new job</a>: "When we notice similar patterns in other countries -- for instance, how many offspring and in-laws of senior Chinese Communist officials have become very, very rich -- we are quick to draw conclusions about structural injustices"</li>
<li>
      <a href="http://isberniesandersstilltalking.com/">Is Bernie Sanders still talking?</a>
    </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/friday_link_dump_20/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/friday_link_dump_20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes, villains and cowards of the so-called &#8220;ground zero mosque&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken, D-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Park51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who's defended religious liberty, who's been too scared to, and who truly hates our founding principles?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bizarre, ginned-up controversy surrounding the Park51 project -- a proposed Islamic community center, like the 92nd Street Y, including a space for worship, to be built at the site of an old Burlington Coat Factory (<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/08/when_is_a_coat_factory_not_a_coat_factory.php">which is a store, not a factory</a>) on Park Place in lower Manhattan, near, but not in sight of, the site of the World Trade Center -- has exposed not just the blatant Islamophobia (and cheerful willingness to exploit bigotry) of many luminaries of the right, but also the cowardice of many supposed liberals. Just so we know where we stand, and using, as criteria for placement, my own inexact impressions of their public statements, I present the official War Room lists of "ground zero mosque" heroes, villains and cowards.</p><p>
    <strong>Heroes</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will attend Charlie Rangel&#8217;s sold-out birthday party?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/11/rangel_birthday_cuomo_schumer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/11/rangel_birthday_cuomo_schumer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Paterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/11/rangel_birthday_cuomo_schumer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The embattled congressman promises speeches tonight from Andrew Cuomo and Chuck Schumer (but they won't confirm)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you going to Representative Charlie Rangel's birthday gala tonight? More importantly, are prominent New York Democrats?</p><p>Rangel's birthday party is always a well-attended party, but most years the longtime congressman is not facing multiple ethics charges. Rangel's campaign sent out a memo claiming that Senator Chuck Schumer and would-be Governor Andrew Cuomo will both be <em>speaking</em> at the gala at the Plaza Hotel. But <a href="http://capitaltonight.com/2010/08/schumer-cuomo-to-attend-rangel-birthday-bash/">neither Cuomo nor Schumer have confirmed their attendence.</a></p><p>It actually sounds like a pretty kick-ass party:</p><blockquote>
<p>Rep. Joe Crowley is to introduce the &#8220;master of ceremonies&#8221; Gov. David Paterson, who briefly wavered about sticking to his agreement to participate, but apparently is back on board. Other speakers include: Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, Mayor Bloomberg, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, and NYC Council Speaker Christine Quinn.</p>
<p>Paterson is, according to this memo, to acknowledge the presence of former NYC Mayor David Dinkins and his father, ex-state Secretary of State Basil Paterson. And then Rangel speaks. Dionne Warwick will take the stage after the congressman, and then do a &#8220;Happy Birthday&#8221; duet with Chuck Jackson.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/11/rangel_birthday_cuomo_schumer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/11/rangel_birthday_cuomo_schumer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angle win complicates Schumer-Durbin race</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/13/schumer_durbin_reid_angle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/13/schumer_durbin_reid_angle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/13/schumer_durbin_reid_angle</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suddenly, Harry Reid has a fighting chance. Is that bad news for Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's tempting to say that the biggest losers on primary night last Tuesday were Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin.</p><p>Their names weren't on a single ballot, but their desire to lead the Senate's Democrats next year is tied to Harry Reid's November fate. If he loses his reelection campaign in Nevada, then his leadership post will open up. But if Reid somehow hangs on, then the race -- presumably -- will be off.</p><p>For months, it was assumed that Reid would go down to defeat. He's had close calls in Nevada before, but never has the climate been as poisonous for him as it is now. When he fell behind his prospective Republican opponents by sizable margins earlier this year, <a href="http://mobile.salon.com/news/the_numerologist/2010/02/26/numerologist/index.html">his fate seemed sealed</a>. Through all of this, of course, Schumer and Durbin professed utter and absolute confidence in Reid's reelection prospects -- even as they <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/20/AR2010052000759.html">privately took steps</a> to shore up their support within the Democratic ranks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/13/schumer_durbin_reid_angle/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/13/schumer_durbin_reid_angle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday link dump: On teasing panthers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Beck's book, Chuck Schumer's honesty, and Rand Paul resurfaces on Fox]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/getting-the-best-of-both-bills-a-conference-committee-report/">Here is a chart</a> of what to fight for in the Financial Regulation conference committee.</li>
<li>NYPD wins terrible court ruling with the old <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/nypd-can-keep-its-secrets-2004-convention-arrests-remain-mysterious/"><em>we can do anything we want because of terror!</em></a> defense.</li>
<li>A very good McClatchy piece <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/06/11/95755/how-obama-blew-his-critical-offshore.html">on where Obama went wrong in approving the expansion of offshore drilling.</a></li>
<li>"New York politician has insane stance on Israel" is not news, but <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/06/senator-chuck-schumer-wants-to-strangle-gaza-residents-economically-as-collective-punishment/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+matthewyglesias+%28Matthew+Yglesias%29">here's Chuck Schumer being a little more honest than he meant to me</a> while speaking to the Orthodox Union. Turns out the Gaza siege is mostly about collective punishment of a million people!</li>
<li>Yes, someone at Media Matters actually <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201006110032">had to read the Glenn Beck book.</a></li>
<li>Here is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/11/pentagon-budget-cuts-coul_n_609132.html">$1 trillion we could cut from the Pentagon budget.</a> Let's make it happen!</li>
<li>Joshua Green is <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/personal/archive/2010/06/an-apology-to-rand-paul/57999/">sorry he made Rush hate Rand Paul.</a></li>
<li>What does a creationist biology "lab" <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/06/what_does_the_biologic_institu.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+scienceblogs%2Fpharyngula+%28Pharyngula%29">do all day?</a></li>
<li>Are you scared of Turkey yet? <a href="http://mondoweiss.net/2010/06/corporate-medias-message-turkey-is-the-new-enemy.html">Haven't you heard that they're Muslims?</a> Just like al-Qaeda!</li>
<li>Yep, regional Tea Parties <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/06/11/tea-freedomworks-demonstration-trash/">are protesting mandatory trash pickup.</a></li>
<li>Rand Paul <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/06/what_if_rand_paul_gave_an_inte.html">had a lovely interview with Sean Hannity.</a></li>
<li>Mitch McConnell <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/06/one-man-government-the-clock-ticks-on/58014/">is still shutting down the government, for fun.</a></li>
<li>Lamar(!) Alexander will solve global warming <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/75470/lamar-and-the-magic-climate-plan">with magic.</a></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos and infighting at New York GOP convention</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/ny_gop_convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/ny_gop_convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/02/ny_gop_convention</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A hated Dem governor is retiring and an unelected senator is vulnerable, but the GOP can't find credible candidates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York state Republican convention <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/chaos_rules_day_at_state_gop_confab_V6NveYlNiMpjBUHz3OKwUI">has been a hilarious mess.</a> But they finally have their candidate for governor: <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/02/republicans-tap-lazio-to-run-for-governor/">longtime loser Rick Lazio.</a> Next up: picking someone to lose to Kirsten Gillibrand!</p><p>As Gabriel Winant pointed out this morning, the GOP is doing everything it can <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races/index.html">to ruin what should be a very good year for them.</a> In New York, they're challenging a barely-known, unelected senator who was appointed by an unpopular, unelected governor. Even New York Democrats are not thrilled with her. The potential GOP&#160;candidates are a former Bear Stearns chief economist, the father of "American Idol's" least popular judge, and a complete unknown from the Board of Commissioners of the Port Authority.</p><p>In the governor's race, they're facing the massively popular Andrew Cuomo, but a credible challenger could probably damage the prickly attorney general.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/ny_gop_convention/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/ny_gop_convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Handicapping a Schumer-Durbin majority leader race</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/30/schumer_durbin_majority_leader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/30/schumer_durbin_majority_leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/05/30/schumer_durbin_majority_leader</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Harry Reid loses this November, Senate Democrats will need a new leader -- and the battle has already begun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a very real possibility that Harry Reid will lose his reelection fight in Nevada -- which means there's a very real possibility that Senate Democrats will be choosing a new leader after November. In fact, a highly unofficial and very under-the-radar race to succeed Reid is already underway, featuring the hard-charging Chuck Schumer and the more mild-mannered Richard Durbin. Almost no one believes there'll be room for a third candidate.</p><p>It's notoriously difficult to predict the outcome of congressional elections, which are draped in mystery, with members intensely skittish about discussing internal matters in public. Personal relationships -- friendships and grudges -- that are invisible to or misunderstood by the public also loom large.</p><p>Still, it's not impossible to handicap the Schumer-Durbin race. There are four major factors that should be crucial in determining the winner:</p><p><strong>Freshmen allegiances</strong>. Chuck Schumer&#8217;s best asset may be his personal connection to the 17 members elected in the last two 2008 and 2006 election cycles, when he was running the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. After this year's elections, these freshmen should make up nearly one-third of the Democratic caucus.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/30/schumer_durbin_majority_leader/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/30/schumer_durbin_majority_leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did majority leader dreams force Schumer&#8217;s hand?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/05/schumer_about_face_majority_leader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/05/schumer_about_face_majority_leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/05/schumer_about_face_majority_leader</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schumer was for Joe Lieberman's plan to strip accused terrorists of their citizenship before he was against it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny what a pending Senate leadership fight that no one wants to talk about can do. Earlier today, Greg Sargent picked up on an interesting about-face from Chuck Schumer, who plainly aspires to succeed the <a href="http://mobile.salon.com/news/the_numerologist/2010/02/26/numerologist/index.html">probably-doomed</a> Harry Reid as the Democrats' Senate leader.</p><p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/05/how_liebermans_citizen-strippi.html">Initially</a>, Schumer had indicated that he supports <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/05/05/faisal_shahzad_lieberman/index.html">Joe Lieberman's plan</a> (soon to be introduced as legislation) to strip accused terrorists of their American citizenship. But as word of his position spread, Schumer's spokesman <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/05/schumer_comes_out_against_lieb.html?wprss=plum-line">told Sargent this afternoon</a> that his boss hadn't really known much about Lieberman's idea when he'd commented.</p><p>"Having learned about the proposal," the spokesman said, "he believes it would be found unconstitutional in this context and would also be ineffective."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/05/schumer_about_face_majority_leader/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/05/schumer_about_face_majority_leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid&#8217;s plan to boost Glenn Beck&#8217;s ratings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/immigration_biometric_id_card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/immigration_biometric_id_card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/30/immigration_biometric_id_card</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What could possibly go wrong with a Democratic proposal to issue mandatory national ID cards?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wants to go big on immigration reform. With Arizona's draconian new immigration law in the headlines, it should be a great way to split the Republicans and rally the Democratic base. Unless it all just becomes a huge shitstorm over biometric national ID cards.</p><p>Democrat Chuck Schumer and heroically whiny Republican moderate Lindsey Graham recently spent weeks hammering out vague areas of agreement on the immigration thing so that Republicans could announce that they made a good-faith effort at bipartisanship -- even though it was basically predetermined that Lindsey would get upset over some bullshit thing or another and back out. (They ended up with an <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/17/AR2010031703115.html">Op-Ed</a> and Lindsey immediately threw a tantrum when he learned that Reid might want to do immigration before climate change.)</p><p>One thing Reid and Schumer agreed on was the necessity of a new national biometric Social Security card for every American worker, because national ID cards hit the sweet spot where Democratic government overreach and Republican police state affection overlap.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/immigration_biometric_id_card/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/immigration_biometric_id_card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Durbin and Schumer both trying to help out Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/durbin_and_schumer_fundraising_for_reid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/durbin_and_schumer_fundraising_for_reid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/28/durbin_and_schumer_fundraising_for_reid</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helping the Democratic leader is smart politics, but it's also part of the job both men already have]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cable news was abuzz Tuesday about a <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/36389.html">report in Politico</a> that Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., were both raising money hand over fist for Harry Reid. Schumer hosted a big event in Brooklyn Monday morning for the embattled Senate majority leader's Nevada reelection race; Durbin will host one in Chicago next week.</p><p>That's the stuff of palace intrigue in the Senate these days. Why? Because both Durbin and Schumer, the second- and third-ranking Democrats there, seem to want to take over Reid's job if he loses in November. Which means just about anything -- including attempts to help Reid keep the gig -- is starting to be viewed by the media as an undercover maneuver designed to position his would-be successors for a leadership race-in-waiting.</p><p>To an extent, that makes some sense. Both Schumer and Durbin clearly appear to be making preparations in case Reid does lose and a contest does develop. The last close Democratic leadership battle, after all, came down to one vote, between Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut and former Sen. Tom Daschle of South Dakota; Reid managed to head off a run by Dodd after Daschle lost in 2004, in part by lining up support early and announcing it just hours after Daschle conceded his Senate race (which, at the time, wasn't the most popular move among Daschle staffers). Smart politicians plan ahead so they can seize opportunities as they come up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/durbin_and_schumer_fundraising_for_reid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/durbin_and_schumer_fundraising_for_reid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schumer and Durbin: Roommates to rivals?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/chuck_schumer_dick_durbin_roommates_and_rivals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/chuck_schumer_dick_durbin_roommates_and_rivals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/04/23/chuck_schumer_dick_durbin_roommates_and_rivals</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two leading candidates to replace Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, if he loses, still live together in D.C.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running for a job someone else already has is awkward enough. But running for a job someone else already has -- and having to beat out your roommate to get it?</p><p>That's the situation Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin could find themselves in this year. Both men may want to take over as Senate majority leader if Harry Reid loses his reelection campaign in November. And both men, when they're not in their respective home states (Illinois for Durbin, New York for Schumer) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/18/garden/18roomies.html">live together</a> in a Capitol Hill house owned by Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., along with Rep. Bill Delahunt, D-Mass. Which means an already delicate situation could wind up being truly weird.</p><p>Neither Durbin nor Schumer wants to seem like he's after Reid's job, or to discuss the prospect of seeking it. "They're still friends, and they will be when Harry Reid is reelected, too," Durbin's spokesman, Joe Shoemaker, told me Thursday -- just after saying he was about to hang the phone up, once I started asking questions about a leadership race. At least he answered it; Schumer aides, for their part, didn't even return phone calls.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/chuck_schumer_dick_durbin_roommates_and_rivals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/chuck_schumer_dick_durbin_roommates_and_rivals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 airlines won&#8217;t charge for carry-ons, senator says</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/18/us_airlines_bag_fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/18/us_airlines_bag_fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/04/18/us_airlines_bag_fees</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Sen. Charles Schumer announces that airplane companies will eschew carry-on charges]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a remarkable gesture to fee-weary air travelers, five major U.S. airlines are committing to actually not charge a fee for something -- the sacred carryon bag.</p><p>The announcement Sunday comes despite the fact that some of those same airlines are expected to report first-quarter losses next week amid significantly higher fuel prices and the beating they took from the heavy February snowstorms. Add-on fees for things like checked bags, pillows and food are a key revenue stream for them.</p><p>For 26 large U.S. airlines, so-called ancillary fee revenue accounted for 6.9 percent of their total operating revenue in the third quarter of 2009, up from 4.1 percent a year earlier, the most recently available government data shows.</p><p>But major carriers risk alienating customers if they follow Spirit Airlines' lead and impose a fee on carryon bags. The small Florida airline in August will begin charging customers up to $45 to place a bag in an overhead bin.</p><p>Other fees haven't stopped people from flying, but many of those fees can be avoided. It would be hard for many travelers to avoid a carryon bag fee.</p><p>"We believe it is something that's important to our customers and they value, and we will continue making that available to them at no charge," American Airlines spokesman Roger Frizzell said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/18/us_airlines_bag_fees/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/18/us_airlines_bag_fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schumer adds name to reconciliation push</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/18/schumer_reconciliation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/18/schumer_reconciliation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/02/18/schumer_reconciliation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does it have more to do with the race to succeed Reid?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An effort to revive the public option by using a Senate procedure known as reconciliation to pass it without threat of filibuster is gaining steam. A letter circulated by Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., and three other senators that urges Majority Leader Harry Reid to opt for reconciliation now has 17 signatures in total, up from 11 just yesterday. And <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/chuck-schumer-to-join-push-for-vote-on-public-option/">the latest name</a> to sign on is a big one, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.</p><p>Schumer's support matters because of his stature within the caucus; he's a member of the leadership, and his fellow senators respect his political acumen, so some may be swayed by his apparent belief that this is a winning issue. More, it's a sign of what may be ahead; Reid isn't expected to win reelection this year, and if he does lose, Schumer's a likely candidate to replace him. He's been staking out a position on the public option generally that could give him a boost in that race, and this decision only adds to that -- as a side effect, it's a bit of a headache for Reid, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/18/schumer_reconciliation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/18/schumer_reconciliation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Take a two-by-four&#8221; to Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/12/2_by_4_hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/12/2_by_4_hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/01/12/2_by_4_hillary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Chuck Schumer called for the secretary of state to be hit with a piece of lumber. Anyone care?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The massive outrage following the revelation that&#160;Harry Reid once celebrated our "light-skinned" president's lack of a "Negro dialect" has been so deafening that few seem to have heard about another disturbing revelation from the bombshell book "Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime." Well, that or people don't care that&#160;Sen. Chuck Schumer allegedly encouraged Obama to hit <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/01/11/2010-01-11_hil_doesnt_believe_flippin_word_about_chuck_betrayal.html">Hillary Clinton with "a two-by-four."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/12/2_by_4_hillary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/12/2_by_4_hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminist silence on Schumer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/schumer_bitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/schumer_bitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/12/17/schumer_bitch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why no outrage over the senator calling a flight attendant a "bitch"? Maybe because it's all too familiar]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I heard Wednesday that&#160;Sen. Charles Schumer had <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/nyregion/17schumer.html?_r=2&amp;emc=eta1">called a flight attendant a "bitch"</a> under his breath, my response was to figuratively shrug my shoulders. I couldn't even muster so much as a literal shrug.&#160;It's not that I thought it appropriate for Schumer to call the flight attendant a "bitch" for asking him to simply comply with federal law like everyone else on the plane and turn off his cellphone; nor did I think it was a particularly pleasant comment for his female colleague and seat mate,&#160;Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, to overhear.&#160;Still, I felt rather "meh" about it.</p><p>Then the feminist guilt started to set in. Even the&#160;<a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/71235/nrsc-plays-the-feminism-card">National Republican Senatorial Committee</a> had come out of the woodwork to demand that Gillibrand and women's rights organizations stand up "for women in the workplace" and admonish Schumer. Was I being a hypocrite? Would I have had the same apathetic response to a Republican bad mouthing a flight attendant with a sexist slur? Had I been so completely sucked into the feminist appropriation of the word that I'd completely forgotten why the word needed to be reclaimed in the first place?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/schumer_bitch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/schumer_bitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally, a public option compromise everyone likes?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/09/opt_out_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/09/opt_out_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/10/08/opt_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An idea to allow states to opt out of a government-run insurance plan is getting some buzz]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, the compromises that have been suggested in an effort to get some form of a public option through the Senate have ended up satisfying no one. There's one new one out there, though, that's getting some traction. Though it's still too early to be sure, there may now be a solution that both liberal and conservative Senate Democrats can agree on.</p><p>Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Tom Carper, D-Del., have <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/schumer-opt-out-public-op_n_313946.html">come up with</a> a proposal that would establish the national government-run insurance option that progressives want, with one caveat. Under the plan they've been discussing, individual states could vote to opt out of the public option. (Ironically, conservatives in various states have been <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/25/state-lawmakers-considering-opt-federal-healthcare/">discussing</a> measures that would opt them out, but that was a negative reaction to the idea of a public option, not a way of achieving compromise.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/09/opt_out_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/09/opt_out_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On stimulus, Dems ready to go it alone</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/05/stimulus_conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/05/stimulus_conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/02/05/stimulus_conference</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top Senate Democrats say they've got the votes to pass the bill as early as Thursday night, and are dismissing GOP concerns. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- At a press conference Thursday, Senate Democrats tried to show that they&#8217;d had just about enough of the game of political chicken going on over the stimulus package. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), for one, seemed ready to leave the GOP behind. &#8220;The idea the president had of 80 votes is a distant memory,&#8221; Schumer said. &#8220;We would rather pass a bill with good ideas at 65 votes. It takes two to tango and the Republicans aren&#8217;t dancing.&#8221;</p><p>Still, Schumer seemed to acknowledge that the GOP has made some headway painting themselves as old-school fiscal conservatives by picking away at provisions in the stimulus package for preventing sexually transmitted diseases and non-smoking programs. But he dismissed any concerns over the strategy, saying, &#8220;People don&#8217;t care about these little items. I think the Republicans are looking for an excuse not to vote for the bill.&#8221;</p><p>Also at the press conference was Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who said he hoped to hold a vote on the stimulus package Thursday, and told reporters that Senate Democrats are prepared to pass the legislation with or without significant Republican support. The GOP, he insisted, &#8220;can not hold the president of the United States hostage.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/05/stimulus_conference/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/05/stimulus_conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

