<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > CIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/cia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: The Paris Review, the Cold War and the CIA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/exclusive_the_paris_review_the_cold_war_and_the_cia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/exclusive_the_paris_review_the_cold_war_and_the_cia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Letters discovered by Salon show even deeper Cold War ties between the Paris Review and a U.S. propaganda front ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1958, the Paris Review’s George Plimpton wrote his Paris editor with a grand proposal. The Russian author Boris Pasternak had just been awarded the Nobel Prize. But under pressure from the Soviets — humiliated that "Dr. Zhivago" had to be smuggled out of the country — he refused it. “The Pasternak affair has caused such a stir here,” writes Plimpton from the journal's New York office, “and is in itself an event of such importance in lit’r’y history that we feel the Review somehow should chronicle what has happened…” Writing to Nelson Aldrich, the Paris editor, Plimpton suggests short statements by a “variety of authors asked to comment. What does Sartre have to say on this matter ... Aragon, Neruda, Waugh? Here [in New York] we have Niccolo Tucci … digging up statements, mostly from writers who (as he is himself) are refugees from tyranny…” Plimpton goes on to suggest that the Congress for Cultural Freedom, largely and <a href="http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/What-was-the-Congress-for-Cultural-Freedom--5597">covertly funded</a> by the CIA, might fund brochures to help publicize the issue.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/exclusive_the_paris_review_the_cold_war_and_the_cia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/exclusive_the_paris_review_the_cold_war_and_the_cia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watergate&#8217;s final mystery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/watergates_final_mystery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/watergates_final_mystery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Underneath the media's obsession with the scandal lies the neglected story of the CIA's role ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalists are obsessing over Watergate again. Debate exploded this week over a new biography of Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee, excerpted in  <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/ben-bradlee-2012-5/">New York</a> magazine. It suggests the legendary editor privately doubted aspects of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein's reporting that helped bring about the resignation of President Richard Nixon in 1974.</p><p>The story prompted a <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75732.html#.T54XtF-jptE.twitter">strong denial</a> from Woodward, a demurral from Bradlee, an <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/top-stories/172465/live-chat-today-dylan-byers-jack-shafer-explain-reporting-behind-new-watergate-claims/">online chat at Poynter</a> and a <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/01/new-questions-about-deep-throat-in-all-the-president-s-men-watergate-revisited.html">Daily Beast story</a> by independent scholar Max Holland, who argues Woodward and Bernstein's book about the scandal, "All the President's Men," is "a fairly tale, albeit a compelling one." After hyping the story for a couple of days, Politico then dismissed it as <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75770.html">"a storm in a Washington teacup."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/watergates_final_mystery/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/watergates_final_mystery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://nixontapeaudio.org/rmh/025-071.mp3" length="1680664" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://nixontapeaudio.org/rmh/587-007a.mp3" length="50953037" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. intelligence unmasked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/understanding_u_s_intelligence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/understanding_u_s_intelligence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12723821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of a new FBI book talks about what being a spy is really like and ways to balance liberty and security]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The job of the intelligence services is to understand others and help leaders act more wisely, says Tim Weiner, the author of a new history of the FBI. There’s also, he tells us, a balance to be struck between liberty and security.</p><p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a><strong>You have spent decades studying the inner workings of America’s intelligence system, and the past few years looking at newly released files from the FBI. What will we learn by reading your new history of the FBI, <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9781400067480%26">"Enemies"</a>?</strong></p><p>You will learn that the Bureau has served first and foremost as a secret intelligence service reporting to the president of the United States. In its first incarnation under J. Edgar Hoover, who ruled the Bureau for 48 years, the FBI was the president’s secret intelligence service. Today, 40 years after Hoover’s death, we still live in the shadow of his legacy. How do you run a secret intelligence agency in an open and democratic society? How do you balance national security and civil liberty? How can we be both safe and free? These are questions that Hoover struggled with, and that we struggle with still.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/understanding_u_s_intelligence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/understanding_u_s_intelligence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The holy grail of the JFK story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/the_holy_grail_of_the_jfk_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/the_holy_grail_of_the_jfk_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JFK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10246718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven steps to unlocking the historical truth about the assassination in Dallas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years from today Americans will observe the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. It is likely to be a moment of national introspection, as well as an opportunity to complete the historical record of one of the most painful days in American history.  Yet, incredibly enough, the Central Intelligence Agency is likely to object to declassifying all of its records related to the murder of the 35th president in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963. The question on the 48th anniversary of the tragedy is whether the CIA's extreme claims of JFK secrecy -- reiterated in federal court filings this year -- will be allowed to stand.</p><p>The tediously unresolved case of the assassinated president never quite goes away as some would wish. Stephen King's new book, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/13/books/review/11-22-63-by-stephen-king-book-review.html?pagewanted=al">"November 22, 1963,"</a>  is yet another imaginative retelling of a critical day in American history, a densely layered epic that appeals to the enduring impulse to understand how the president of the United States was gunned down in broad daylight, and why no one was ever brought to justice for the crime.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/the_holy_grail_of_the_jfk_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/the_holy_grail_of_the_jfk_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>187</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence agencies step up the Twitter and Facebook trawling</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security works to catch up with the CIA in the social media monitoring department]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of days ago, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2QncVujJYeKvVMAwzSqq5eSaSLA?docId=d607e3efe1324adeb54d3fd505e1feb1">the Associated Press reported</a> that the Department of Homeland Security claims not to be "actively monitoring" social media networks like Facebook and Twitter. Lest you worry that status updates that present a threat to national security are going unread, the <a href="http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111104/ap_on_go_ot/us_cia_social_media">AP today reports</a> that the Central Intelligence Agency <em>is</em> actively monitoring social media networks.</p><p>The story in the earlier article was that our sprawling intelligence and national security apparatus was caught off-guard by social media-fueled uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa, and that they were going to take steps to be better prepared in the future.</p><p>DHS Undersecretary Caryn Wagner said the department was still trying to figure out how to use Twitter and Facebook information for law enforcement purposes. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2QncVujJYeKvVMAwzSqq5eSaSLA?docId=d607e3efe1324adeb54d3fd505e1feb1">And they seem to be starting completely from scratch:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insiders voice doubts about CIA&#8217;s 9/11 story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/insiders_voice_doubts_cia_911/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/insiders_voice_doubts_cia_911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10103777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former FBI agents say the agency\'s bin Laden unit misled them about two hijackers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A growing number of former government insiders -- all responsible officials who served in a number of federal posts -- are now on record as doubting ex-CIA director George Tenet’s account of events leading up to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Among them are several special agents of the FBI, the former counterterrorism head in the Clinton and Bush administrations, and the chairman of the 9/11 Commission, who told us the CIA chief had been “obviously not forthcoming" in his testimony and had misled the commissioners.</p><p>These doubts about the CIA first emerged among a group of 9/11 victims' families whose struggle to force the government to investigate the causes of the attacks, we chronicled in our 2006 documentary film <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Press-For-Truth-Official-Page/25278247460">"Press for Truth."</a> At that time, we thought we were done with the subject. But tantalizing information unearthed by the 9/11 Commission’s <a href="http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf">final report</a> and spotted by the families (Chapter 6, footnote 44) raised a question too important to be put aside:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/insiders_voice_doubts_cia_911/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/insiders_voice_doubts_cia_911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers seek docs on NYPD unit that eyed Muslims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/us_nypd_intelligence_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/us_nypd_intelligence_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Civil rights attorneys investigate the controversial surveillance program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Civil rights lawyers asked a federal judge Monday to force the New York Police Department to turn over documents about its secret efforts to spy on and infiltrate the Muslim community.</p><p>The request, filed in federal court in Manhattan, is based on reporting by The Associated Press, which revealed a clandestine police unit that monitored all aspects of daily life in Muslim neighborhoods. Documents showed that plainclothes officers were being dispatched to eavesdrop inside businesses. Restaurants that serve Muslims were identified and photographed. Hundreds of mosques were investigated. Dozens were infiltrated.</p><p>Police also maintained a list of 28 countries that, along with "American Black Muslim," were labeled "ancestries of interest."</p><p>"Based on this evidence, there is reason to believe that the NYPD retains records of surveillance of public places that are not limited to information pertaining to 'potential unlawful activity or terrorism,'" lawyers told U.S. District Judge Charles Haight.</p><p>A spokesman for the New York Police Department didn't immediately respond to a message seeking comment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/us_nypd_intelligence_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/us_nypd_intelligence_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. tells court bin Laden photos must stay secret</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/us_bin_laden_photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/us_bin_laden_photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama administration argues that public disclosure of images would compromise safety of Americans abroad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public disclosure of graphic photos and video taken of Osama bin Laden after he was killed in May by U.S. commandos would damage national security and lead to attacks on American property and personnel, the Obama administration contends in a court documents.</p><p>In a response late Monday to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group seeking the imagery, Justice Department attorneys said the CIA has located 52 photographs and video recordings. But they argued the images of the deceased bin Laden are classified and are being withheld from the public to avoid inciting violence against Americans overseas and compromising secret systems and techniques used by the CIA and the military.</p><p>The Justice Department has asked the court to dismiss Judicial Watch's lawsuit because the records the group wants are "wholly exempt from disclosure," according to the filing.</p><p>Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, accused the Obama administration of making a "political decision" to keep the bin Laden imagery secret. "We shouldn't throw out our transparency laws because complying with them might offend terrorists," Fitton said in a statement. "The historical record of Osama bin Laden's death should be released to the American people as the law requires."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/us_bin_laden_photos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/us_bin_laden_photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attack on Kabul CIA office kills 1 American</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/as_afghanistan_61/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/as_afghanistan_61/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Afghan employed by the U.S. government carries out deadly shooting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Afghan employed by the U.S. government killed one American and wounded another in an attack on a CIA office in Kabul, officials said Monday.</p><p>The shooting Sunday evening is the most recent in a growing number of attacks this year by Afghans working with the country's international allies. Some assailants have turned out to be Taliban sleeper agents, while others have been motivated by personal grievances.</p><p>Gunfire was first heard sometime after 8 p.m. local time around the former Ariana Hotel, a building that ex-U.S. intelligence officials said is the CIA station in Kabul. The spy agency occupied the heavily secured building just blocks from the Afghan presidential palace in late 2001 after the U.S.-led invasion that toppled the Taliban.</p><p>The U.S. Embassy said an Afghan employee of the complex shot dead an American citizen and wounded another before being killed.</p><p>"The motivation for the attack is still under investigation," the embassy said in a statement.</p><p>Embassy spokesman Gavin Sundwall declined to comment on what the targeted annex was used for, citing security reasons. Sundwall said the Afghan employee was not authorized to carry a weapon, and it was not clear how the man was able to get a gun into the secured compound.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/as_afghanistan_61/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/as_afghanistan_61/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extraordinary rendition lawsuit also window into low point for American experiment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fight between subcontractors leads to the publication of details of the CIA's secret kidnapping program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lawsuit between two aviation companies concerning a couple hundred thousand dollars in unpaid expenses has inadvertently <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-records-of-court-case-lie-details-of-secret-airlifts-of-terror-suspects-to-cia-run-prisons/2011/09/01/gIQAT3vetJ_story.html">led to the publicizing of a great deal of information</a> about the CIA's extraordinary rendition program. (The program involved the illegal transport of thousands of terrorism suspects to secret CIA prisons in foreign nations and then to countries where suspects could be tortured. It is basically "kidnapping" followed by "torture" but the CIA did it so no one went to jail for it.)</p><p>The records from this lawsuit between two sub-contractors involved in the renditions will eventually be taught in an undergrad history course titled "America:&#160;Where It All Went Wrong." Detainees were transported by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sportsflight_Airways">the same companies</a> that fly billionaires on private jets to their resort vacations. (The CIA doesn't have an air force, so they relied on massive government contractor DynCorp, which... just rented some private planes.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Censored by the CIA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/censored_by_cia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/censored_by_cia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/08/30/censored_by_cia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 23-year veteran of the agency reveals how the vetting process is used to stifle critics of the war on terror]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News that the CIA has demanded "extensive cuts" from a forthcoming book by former FBI agent Ali Soufan made the front page of the New York Times last week. But Soufan's isn't the only recent memoir to earn the intelligence agency's wrath by, in part, criticizing its use of brutal interrogation techniques in the decade since 9/11. There's also "The Interrogator," by Glenn Carle, a 23-year CIA veteran who was given the task of questioning a purported al-Qaida kingpin in 2002. Carle's book was published earlier this summer with many passages -- and occasionally entire pages -- blocked out with black bars to show where the agency had insisted on redactions.</p><p>Soufan has called many of the CIA's excisions from his own book "ridiculous," pointing out that some of the "classified" information is a matter of public record and appears in the 9/11 report and even in a memoir by former CIA director George Tenet. Carle had a similar experience; "The Interrogator" is laced with caustic footnotes explaining that redacted passages revealed the agency's incompetence, rather than sensitive information.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/censored_by_cia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/censored_by_cia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With CIA help, NYPD moves covertly in Muslim areas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/us_sept_11_nypd_intelligence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/us_sept_11_nypd_intelligence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/24/us_sept_11_nypd_intelligence</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York police force has become one of the country's most aggressive domestic intelligence agencies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New Brunswick, N.J., a building superintendent opened the door to apartment No. 1076 one balmy Tuesday and discovered an alarming scene: terrorist literature strewn about the table and computer and surveillance equipment set up in the next room.</p><p>The panicked superintendent dialed 911, sending police and the FBI rushing to the building near Rutgers University on the afternoon of June 2, 2009. What they found in that first-floor apartment, however, was not a terrorist hideout but a command center set up by a secret team of New York Police Department intelligence officers.</p><p>From that apartment, about an hour outside the department's jurisdiction, the NYPD had been staging undercover operations and conducting surveillance throughout New Jersey. Neither the FBI nor the local police had any idea.</p><p>Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the NYPD has become one of the country's most aggressive domestic intelligence agencies. A months-long investigation by The Associated Press has revealed that the NYPD operates far outside its borders and targets ethnic communities in ways that would run afoul of civil liberties rules if practiced by the federal government. And it does so with unprecedented help from the CIA in a partnership that has blurred the bright line between foreign and domestic spying.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/us_sept_11_nypd_intelligence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/us_sept_11_nypd_intelligence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The man who hunted Osama bin Laden</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/us_bin_laden_s_hunter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/us_bin_laden_s_hunter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/07/05/us_bin_laden_s_hunter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the CIA analyst who tracked down the al-Qaida leader over the course of a decade]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Navy SEALs killed Osama bin Laden, the White House released a photo of President Barack Obama and his Cabinet inside the Situation Room, watching the daring raid unfold.</p><p>Hidden from view, standing just outside the frame of that now-famous photograph was a career CIA analyst. In the hunt for the world's most-wanted terrorist, there may have been no one more important. His job for nearly a decade was finding the al-Qaida leader.</p><p>The analyst was the first to put in writing last summer that the CIA might have a legitimate lead on finding bin Laden. He oversaw the collection of clues that led the agency to a fortified compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. His was among the most confident voices telling Obama that bin Laden was probably behind those walls.</p><p>The CIA will not permit him to speak with reporters. But interviews with former and current U.S. intelligence officials reveal a story of quiet persistence and continuity that led to the greatest counterterrorism success in the history of the CIA. Nearly all the officials insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to reporters or because they did not want their names linked to the bin Laden operation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/us_bin_laden_s_hunter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/us_bin_laden_s_hunter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Interrogator:&#8221; A CIA insider&#8217;s crisis of conscience</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/03/the_interrogator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/03/the_interrogator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/07/03/the_interrogator</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a secret prison, a true believer in the war on terror realized he was tormenting an innocent man]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The situation had become Kafkaesque," writes Glenn Carle toward the end of <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ISBNInquiry.asp?EAN=9781568586731">"The Interrogator: An Education,"</a> his new memoir. Boy, he ain't kidding; the author of "The Trial" and "The Metamorphosis" would have appreciated this narrative on any number of levels. Carle worked for the CIA for 23 years, in Africa, the Balkans and Latin America, among other locales, but the focus of his book is the several-month period he spent questioning a suspected leader of al-Qaida in two countries he is not permitted to name.</p><p>There's quite a lot Carle isn't allowed to say in "The Interrogator." Many lines and words on these pages have been masked with black bars to indicate what "the Agency" forbade him to publish. "I have written this book literally a dozen times over," the author notes in his afterword, explaining that he was willing to address "legitimate" CIA concerns when it came to revelations about its "sources and methods."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/03/the_interrogator/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/03/the_interrogator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Juan Cole reading list, 2005 to 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A collection of the Michigan professor's Salon pieces from the time he was reportedly under the CIA's watch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/cia/index.html?story=/news/feature/2011/06/16/cia_juan_cole">revelations of a former CIA operative,</a> the Bush White House and the CIA asked officers to spy on university professor, blogger and Salon contributor, Juan Cole in 2005 and 2006. Cole was one of the most outspoken critics of the Iraq war and Bush's fore gin policy.&#160; Below is just a short selection of Cole's contributions to Salon in 2005 and 2006; examples of writing allegedly deemed concerning enough for the Bush establishment to invite CIA surveillance.</p><ul>
<li><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/07/08/blowback">Writing in response to the deadly blasts on the London Underground in July 2005</a>, Cole criticized "Bush and Blair's incompetently pursued war on terror." he wrote, "If Americans look closer... they will realize that Bush's incompetent crusade has made the world more dangerous, not less."</li>
<li>Similarly, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/07/21/iran/">Cole skewered the Bush administration when newly elected Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari seemed to be developing close ties with Iran.</a> "All the sorts of contracts and deals that U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney had imagined for Halliburton, and that the Pentagon neoconservatives had hoped for Israel, were heading instead due east," Cole noted at the time.</li>
<li>Then in March 2006, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2006/03/01/worst">as violence in Iraq was peaking, Cole wrote that</a> "bloody events in Iraq have undermined American authority in that country and in the Middle East more generally."</li>
<li>He was also fiercely critical of Bush's rhetoric on Iraq. When the president avoided describing the situation there as a "civil war," (a term the Iraqi prime minister employed), <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2006/03/23/civil_war">Cole emphasized how wrong Bush was.</a></li>
<li>Similarly, Cole noted that <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2006/12/30/saddam">Saddam Hussein's execution, decreed through what he described as "the bumbling of the U.S.-backed regime,"</a> was little more than an act of revenge that turned the dictator into a martyr.</li>
<li>And Cole broadened his sights beyond Iraq. He wrote scathingly about Bush's approach to Israel and Palestine and was quick to point to the problems with how the then-President responded to Hamas' victory in legislative elections in Gaza in 2006. "<a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2006/01/27/hamas">How do you like your democracy now, Mr Bush?</a>" Cole wrote.</li>
</ul><p>Evidently, with a voice as influential as Cole's, calling the focal point of an administration's foreign policy "a colossal misadventure" makes waves; the White House and the CIA may not have taken heed of his writing, but -- if recent reports are to be believed -- it certainly caught their attention.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the CIA spy on Iraq war critic Juan Cole?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/cia_juan_cole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/cia_juan_cole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/16/cia_juan_cole</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former agency officer claims the Bush White House asked for personal information on antiwar blogger]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/16/us/politics/16cole.html?_r=1&amp;hp">reporting</a> a former CIA officer's claim that the Bush White House and the CIA asked operatives to spy on university professor, blogger (and frequent <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/juan_cole/">Salon contributor</a>) <a href="http://www.lsa.umich.edu/history/facstaff/facultydetail.asp?ID=49">Juan Cole</a> in 2005 and 2006.</p><p>From James Risen's Thursday morning Times piece:</p><blockquote>
<p>Glenn L. Carle, a former Central Intelligence Agency officer who was a top counterterrorism official during the administration of President George W. Bush, said the White House at least twice asked intelligence officials to gather sensitive information on [Professor Cole]. ...</p>
</blockquote><blockquote>
<p>In an interview, Mr. Carle said his supervisor at the National Intelligence Council told him in 2005 that White House officials wanted &#8220;to get&#8221; Professor Cole, and made clear that he wanted Mr. Carle to collect information about him, an effort Mr. Carle rebuffed. Months later, Mr. Carle said, he confronted a C.I.A. official after learning of another attempt to collect information about Professor Cole. Mr. Carle said he contended at the time that such actions would have been unlawful.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/cia_juan_cole/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/cia_juan_cole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gates: Pakistan arrests for CIA help are reality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Gates did not directly confirm the reports, he is telling senators that "most governments lie to each other"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defense Secretary Robert Gates is dismissing as harsh reality the accusations that Pakistani officials arrested several people who provided information to the CIA before the U.S. raid that killed Osama bin Laden.</p><p>While Gates did not directly confirm the reports, he is telling senators that "most governments lie to each other," sometimes they arrest people, and sometimes they spy on us. He says it's the "real world we deal with."</p><p>Gates was responding to sharp questions from Vermont Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy during a Capitol Hill hearing.</p><p>Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says the U.S. is struggling to rebuild its badly broken relationship with Pakistan.</p><p>A Western official in Pakistan has confirmed that five Pakistanis were arrested by Pakistan's top intelligence service.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primer: CIA drones head to Yemen</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/yemen_cia_drones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/yemen_cia_drones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/14/yemen_cia_drones</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Obama's move to send CIA-operated aircraft to Yemen is a big deal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303848104576384051572679110.html">Wall Street Journal</a> reported late Monday night that the CIA is set to begin operating drone strikes in Yemen targeting al-Qaida suspects.</p><p><strong>Why is this important?</strong> As <a href="http://mobile.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/09/u_s_yemen_airstrikes">we noted last week</a>, U.S. military drone strikes are nothing new in Yemen; the shift to include CIA patrols alongside those of the military unmanned aircraft points to growing concern about the tumultuous region -- that al-Qaida operatives could gain purchase in the power vacuum as opposition groups continue deadly fights with government forces loyal to President Ali Abdullah Saleh's oppressive regime.</p><p><strong>What is new here?</strong> The Obama administration's decision to deploy CIA-operated unmanned aircraft suggests a concern that military operations alone will not suffice now that the Yemeni government has shifted resources to fighting for its own survival as opposed to battling al-Qaida. And as the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/cia-to-operate-drones-over-yemen/2011/06/13/AG7VyyTH_story.html">Washington Post</a> notes, "the CIA may have greater latitude to carry out strikes if the political climate shifts in Yemen and cooperation with American forces is diminished or cut off."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/yemen_cia_drones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/yemen_cia_drones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistan TV channel names alleged CIA station chief</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/09/as_pakistan_bin_laden_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/09/as_pakistan_bin_laden_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/09/as_pakistan_bin_laden_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Name used is incorrect, but attempt marks the second potential outing of a sensitive covert operative in six months]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pakistani media have reported what they say is the name of the CIA station chief in Islamabad -- the second such potential outing of a sensitive covert operative in six months, and one that comes with tensions running high over the U.S. raid in Pakistan that killed al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden.</p><p>The Associated Press has learned that the name being reported is incorrect. Still, the publication of any alleged identity of the U.S. spy agency's top official in this country could be pushback from Pakistan's powerful military and intelligence establishment, which was humiliated over the surprise raid on its soil, and could further sour relations between Washington and Islamabad.</p><p>On Friday, the private TV channel ARY broadcast what it said was the current station chief's name. The Nation, a right-wing newspaper, picked up the story Saturday.</p><p>ARY's news director, Mazhar Abbas, said the television station's reporter gleaned the name from a source. He defended the broadcast, saying it was "based on fact," and denounced allegations that the name was leaked to the television channel by an official with a motive.</p><p>"The prime responsibility of the reporter is to give a story which is based on facts," he said. "Interpretation of the story is something else."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/09/as_pakistan_bin_laden_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/09/as_pakistan_bin_laden_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Osama captured before being shot?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/bin_laden_captured_reports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/bin_laden_captured_reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/04/bin_laden_captured_reports</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Pakistani report suggests he was, but the CIA categorically denies it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a quick note on the story floating around that, contra the White House, Osama bin Laden was captured by U.S. commandos before being shot to death.</p><p>Legitimate doubt has been cast on the official narrative of the raid ever since the Obama administration changed <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/05/03/osama_human_shield">major</a> <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54162.html">details</a> of what it claims happened. (A Pentagon official, for example, said Monday that bin Laden was firing a gun at U.S. forces from behind a human shield when he was killed. Now the White House says he was not armed and there was no human shield.)</p><p>The possibility that bin Laden was captured was raised in a <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/world/daughter-12-saw-killing-of-unarmed-bin-laden-20110504-1e8fl.html">report</a> by an Arab news agency citing Pakistani officials describing an interview with bin Laden's young daughter, who was apparently at the compound:</p><blockquote>
<p>The daughter has claimed that she watched as her father was captured alive and shot before being dragged to a US military helicopter, Arabic news network al-Arabiya quoted Pakistani officials as saying.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/bin_laden_captured_reports/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/bin_laden_captured_reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>127</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

