<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Civil rights movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/civil_rights_movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Harry Belafonte changed America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/29/my_song_harry_belafonte/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/29/my_song_harry_belafonte/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10153339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The jazz great\'s new autobiography chronicles his experiences as a musician and a civil rights activist  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity memoirs, of which there are a surfeit these days, tend to follow a predictable pattern: open on a moment of crisis, preferably a near-death experience (the Brush with Death); stumble upon a star turn (the Big Break); and fill the balance of the book with a succession of successes, leavened by a few instructive failures (the Happily Ever After). What brings us back to these books in spite of their predictability is the voyeuristic sensation of glimpsing the private lives of public people.</p><p><a href="http://bnreview.barnesandnoble.com"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://images.barnesandnoble.com/pImages/bn-review/2010/bnreviewlogo.gif" alt="Barnes &amp; Noble Review" align="left" /></a>Harry Belafonte's <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9780307272263%26">"My Song"</a> is in many ways just this sort of conventional celebrity memoir. What distinguishes it -- and elevates it to excellence -- is the quality of experience that the book chronicles. Belafonte's Brush with Death isn't an overdose in a suite at the Chateau Marmont, it's a high-speed escape with Sidney Poitier from the Ku Klux Klan to deliver a suitcase filled with tens of thousands of dollars to support civil rights activists in Mississippi. His Big Break isn't a record label intern discovering his demo at the bottom of a box of unsolicited tapes, it's walking onstage for his first gig to find that his backup band consists of jazz immortals Max Roach, Al Haig, Tommy Potter and Charlie Parker. His Happily Ever After isn't a series of Billboard and box office hits, famous paramours and big paychecks (though he enjoys all of these in abundance), it's a lifelong commitment to the cause of civil rights, both at home and abroad.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/29/my_song_harry_belafonte/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/29/my_song_harry_belafonte/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breitbart shock: Obama was in same place at same time as New Black Panthers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wingers once again try to connect the president to a fringe group of laughable conservative boogeymen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Breitbart's loud, dumb BigGovernment site <a href="http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/10/03/shock-photos-barack-obama-with-new-black-panther-party-on-campaign-trail-in-2007/">has a loud, dumb story</a> about how Barack Obama "appeared and marched with the New Black Panther Party in 2007." The occasion was the 42nd anniversary of the march from Selma, Alabama, and in addition to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Al Sharpton were also there, along with dozens of civil rights era luminaries and <em>thousands of other people</em> because <em>it was a massive annual celebration</em> and not actually an Obama campaign event.</p><p>The New Black Panther Party is a cartoonish fringe group of a couple guys who play "'60s radical" dress-up and say mean things about whitey for Fox cameras in order to scare old white people. They have been <a href="http://www.blackpanther.org/newsalert.htm">explicitly rejected by the old Black Panther Party</a>. For some reason, various conservatives have dedicated themselves to proving that this weird, marginal group of Nation of Islam cast-offs is somehow supported by or deeply connected to the Democratic Party and the Obama administration in particular, because, you know, Eric Holder and Barack Obama, those are two guys who very obviously share the values of extremist anti-white proponents of racial separation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico commenters weigh in on the White House&#8217;s historic civil rights painting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/politico_rockwell_comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/politico_rockwell_comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/24/politico_rockwell_comments</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Norman Rockwell's "The Problem We All Live With" now hangs at the White House, upsetting... certain kinds of people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politico recently switched the commenting system <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0811/Facebook_comments.html">on its blogs</a> to one requiring a Facebook account, in order to encourage more polite discussion and discourage trolling and racism. Thankfully for fans of awful comments, they did not make the switch on the <em>articles</em>, a completely meaningless distinction in 2011 but one that allows us to sample the responses of the Politico commentariat <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61677.html#ixzz1VxHhm9Bo">to this story,</a> about Barack Obama hanging a famous painting in the White House. The painting is Norman Rockwell's "The Problem We All Live With," and it depicts "U.S. marshals escorting Ruby Bridges, a 6-year-old African-American girl, into a New Orleans elementary school in 1960 as court-ordered integration met with an angry and defiant response from the white community."</p><p>Here, in no particular order, are <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/members/forums/thread.cfm?catid=1&amp;subcatid=5&amp;threadid=5837654">some of my "favorite" Politico comments</a> on the story.</p><p>"J.O.B.S." writes:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/politico_rockwell_comments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/politico_rockwell_comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Santorum just said what most antiabortion activists think</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/santorum_abortion_black/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/santorum_abortion_black/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/20/santorum_abortion_black</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-shot 2012 candidate isn't alone in claiming he doesn't understand how a black person can be pro-choice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Santorum successfully inserted himself into the news cycle today by saying something stupid and offensive about the president, race and abortion. The only thing most people remember about the two-term former senator from Pennsylvania is that Dan Savage turned his name <a href="http://www.spreadingsantorum.com/">into a filthy sex term</a>, but he is still apparently running for president. And what better way to kick off the campaign than with a media firestorm over controversial comments?</p><p>On some sort of weird basement public access Christian talk show, Santorum said President Obama should support banning abortion because he is black. <object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dxgB7pwbO7k?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dxgB7pwbO7k?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object></p><p>
    <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/santorum-on-obama-remarkable-for-a-black-man-to-support-abortion-rights/69944/">Take it away, Rick:</a>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/santorum_abortion_black/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/santorum_abortion_black/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s most persecuted minority group: Republicans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/17/persecuted_republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/17/persecuted_republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/17/persecuted_republicans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On this Martin Luther King Day, spare a thought for America's forgotten minority: Comfortable white conservatives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the old white guys pictured above voted against the establishment of Martin Luther King Jr. Day as a federal holiday. (John McCain did, in 2008, apologize for his vote.) 28 years later, it's hard to imagine even a deeply Republican Congress opposing a holiday dedicated to Dr. King -- in part because some contemporary conservatives like to pretend the civil rights activist was or would be a Republican, but mostly because conservatives have spent years pretending to be a persecuted minority group.</p><p>That's why something like Sarah Palin claiming to be a victim of "blood libel" doesn't raise an eyebrow among the true believers. It's the myth that keeps the checks rolling in for most right-wingers. The liberals are all-powerful and they oppress us.</p><p>It's especially rich coming from Palin, obviously. The only thing the former governor seems to enjoy more than attacking her political opponents is acting like the entire world is aligned against her and her poor family. A tasteless joke from a late night comedian isn't simply part of the cost of living a public life, it's more proof that a cabal of liberal elites is devoted to the relentless persecution of innocent conservative Americans. (Part of the game involves purposefully conflating criticism from media figures with <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/09/04/4433533-the-obama-biden-attack-on-palins-family">organized political attacks</a>. What, after all, is the true difference between David Letterman and the DNC? They're all liberals.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/17/persecuted_republicans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/17/persecuted_republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Author of Barbour profile comments on controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/haley_barbour_weekly_standard_profile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/haley_barbour_weekly_standard_profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haley Barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/20/haley_barbour_weekly_standard_profile</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Weekly Standard scribe who profiled Haley Barbour offers context on the governor's remarks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spoke with Andrew Ferguson, the author of the big new&#160;Weekly Standard <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/boy-yazoo-city_523551.html?nopager=1">profile</a> of Mississippi governor and potential presidential hopeful Haley Barbour. The profile has been <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/race/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/12/20/haley_barbour_civil_rights">making waves</a> today for, among other things, a passage in which Barbour, a native of Yazoo City, Miss., seems to downplay the effects of segregation:</p><blockquote>
<p>In interviews Barbour doesn&#8217;t have much to say about growing up in the midst of the civil rights revolution. &#8220;I just don&#8217;t remember it as being that bad,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I remember Martin Luther King came to town, in &#8217;62. He spoke out at the old fairground and it was full of people, black and white.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote><p>Asked about the first quote in that passage, Ferguson told me:&#160;"I don't think that he meant segregation wasn't that bad. I think he meant that it didn't roil the town the way some people might think it did." He added:&#160;"I get the sense that [Barbour] himself was just kind of oblivious. He was a fun loving football player, probably chasing skirts and all that."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/haley_barbour_weekly_standard_profile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/haley_barbour_weekly_standard_profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; repeal, a rights landmark</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/19/us_gays_in_military_reax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/19/us_gays_in_military_reax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/19/us_gays_in_military_reax</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Civil rights activists take stock in the accomplishment and of what more needs to be done]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the U.S. military is a step toward equality, advocates say, but a fight for other social changes such as gay marriage still lies ahead.</p><p>The Senate voted Saturday to end the 17-year ban on openly gay troops, overturning the Clinton-era policy known as "don't ask, don't tell."</p><p>"It's one step in a very long process of becoming an equal rights citizen," said Warren Arbury of Savannah, Ga., who served in the Army for seven years, including three combat tours, before being kicked out two years ago under the policy. He said he planned to re-enlist once the policy is abolished.</p><p>"Even though this is really huge, I look at it as a chink in a very, very long chain," he added.</p><p>The ruling drew quick rebuke from foes of lifting the ban who argued that the military shouldn't be used to expand the rights of gays and that allowing them to serve openly would hurt troop morale and a unit's ability fight.</p><p>Supporters declared the vote a civil rights milestone.</p><p>Aaron Belkin, director of the California-based Palm Center -- a think tank on the issue -- said the vote "ushers in a new era in which the largest employer in the United States treats gays and lesbians like human beings."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/19/us_gays_in_military_reax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/19/us_gays_in_military_reax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wednesday link dump: Fight the imaginary cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/wednesday_link_dump_27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/wednesday_link_dump_27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/10/wednesday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Misremembering the history of conservative Democrats, fantastical budget proposals, and whining to Morning Joe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>The GOP will balance the budget <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/10/us/politics/p10spending.html?_r=2&amp;ref=politics">by cutting non-existent programs.</a></li>
<li>Matt Bai: It's foolish to kick conservative Democrats out of the party, because without them, <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/79056/the-shaky-case-conservative-democrats">how could we have passed civil right legislation?</a> Yes, well, funny story about conservative Democrats and civil rights legislation...</li>
<li>Are Democratic senators whining to Joe Scarborough <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/11/dem_senators_privately_griping.html?wprss=plum-line">about how the president wasn't bipartisan enough?</a> Yes, probably. I mean, these are senators we're talking about -- they're the whiniest people in the world.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/wednesday_link_dump_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/wednesday_link_dump_27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot chile nuts &#8212; crunchy, sweet and fiery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/09/roasted_chili_powder_nuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/09/roasted_chili_powder_nuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kitchen Challenge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/kitchen_challenge/2010/11/08/roasted_chili_powder_nuts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget those airplane nuts and try these, booming with a homemade chile powder and smoothed over with honey]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To read Paul's story on his inspiration for these nuts, a chance meeting with Rebecca Clark, civil rights hero and mother to a bawdy soul singer, <a href="http://open.salon.com/blog/paulhinr/2010/11/04/dont_get_em_from_the_peanut_man">click here</a>.</p><p>
    <strong>Chile Powder</strong>
  </p><p>Makes about &#189; cup</p><p>We'll get started by making some chile powder. It's not really necessary, but the powder you make will be better than the stuff you buy. These dried ancho, arbol and pequin peppers are easy to find in the Hispanic aisle of your local Piggly Wiggly. You might have to order the cascabels and chipotles. Or substitute other peppers. You can make your powder as spicy or mild as you like, or alternatively, you can just jazz up the powder you buy with some additional peppers.</p><div class="ingredients">
<h3>Ingredients</h3>
<ul>
<li>1-2 ancho chiles</li>
<li>1-2 cascabel chiles</li>
<li>1-2 chipotle chiles</li>
<li>2 arbol chiles</li>
<li>1 teaspoon pequin chile</li>
<li>1 tablespoon whole cumin seeds</li>
<li>1 tablespoon whole coriander seeds</li>
<li>1 tablespoon garlic powder</li>
<li>1 tablespoon dried oregano</li>
</ul></div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/09/roasted_chili_powder_nuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/09/roasted_chili_powder_nuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart&#8217;s great risk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/24/taylor_branch_jon_stewart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/24/taylor_branch_jon_stewart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/24/taylor_branch_jon_stewart</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historian Taylor Branch on the promise -- and huge potential pratfalls -- of the "Rally to Restore Sanity"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart's <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-september-16-2010/rally-to-restore-sanity">announcement</a> last Thursday of his&#160;"<a href="http://www.rallytorestoresanity.com/">Rally to Restore Sanity</a>"&#160;on Oct. 30 has, not surprisingly, generated significant interest from "Daily Show" fans. (The current number of people signed up on the rally's Facebook page is 140,000). But it also prompted some confusion, even from longtime fans. What is Stewart trying to achieve? Does this mark a more formal embrace of politics? Will this change the way he's perceived?</p><p>Salon spoke to Taylor Branch, Pulitzer Prize-winning civil rights historian and scholar of mass political movements, about Stewart's role in popular culture and politics and what benefits and risks the rally holds for him. (We also asked Branch about the controversial New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/05/opinion/05branch.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Op-Ed</span></a> he recently penned expressing sympathy for Glenn Beck's 8/28 "Restoring Honor" rally.) <em><strong><br /></strong></em></p><p>
    <strong>What do you think the goal of Stewart's rally is?</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/24/taylor_branch_jon_stewart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/24/taylor_branch_jon_stewart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday link dump: Ugg motivation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/monday_link_dump_16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/monday_link_dump_16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haley Barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/13/monday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal shills for corporate boots, Congress is back in session, and vaccines are still safe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Vaccines <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100913/hl_nm/us_mercury_autism">still don't cause autism</a>.</li>
<li>A story on Ugg boots inspires a wonderful takedown of the Wall Street Journal <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/13/how-the-wsj-magazine-fails-its-readers/">by Felix Salmon.</a></li>
<li>Congress is back in session. Good news: Hysterical August nonsense news cycle time is done. Bad news: <a href="http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2010/0913_congress_mann.aspx?rssid=LatestFromBrookings&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BrookingsRSS%2Ftopfeeds%2FLatestFromBrookings+%28Brookings%3A+Latest+From+Brookings%29">Congress will not accomplish anything.</a></li>
<li>Haley Barbour <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/09/09/100339/haley-barbour-race-ole-miss-from.html#storylink=misearch">remembers forced integration of Ole Miss as a "very pleasant experience."</a></li>
<li>The Tea Parties <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42068.html">would like some Jewish members.</a></li>
<li>The Statue of Liberty was given to us <a href="http://firedoglake.com/2010/09/13/sarah-palin-statue-of-liberty-was-warning-against-socialism/">to remind us to always fight against socialism.</a></li>
<li>Marc Thiessen <a href="http://wonkette.com/420897/there-is-going-to-be-a-terrorist-attack-on-september-11-2011-if-marc-thiessen-has-to-do-it-himself">is plotting against us.</a></li>
<li>Crazy Chuck Grassley <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0910/Grassley_will_do_what_it_takes.html?showall">released an ad touting his semi-literate Twitter feed.</a></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/monday_link_dump_16/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/monday_link_dump_16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, Glenn Beck, I was at the March on Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/march_on_washington_glenn_beck_open2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/march_on_washington_glenn_beck_open2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/08/26/march_on_washington_glenn_beck_open2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Restoring Honor" parade tarnishes an event whose shared humanity was unlike anything I've felt before or since]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several small groups of radicals, anarchists, civil rights movement people, crazies -- the quixotic among us at the time -- had concluded that the Great March on Washington had the potential to bring together a disparate group of Americans, mostly black Americans, and deliver a statement on the condition of the movement vs. American society. This had struck us (I was among this group of misfits) as just audacious enough to possibly soften some establishment hearts and maybe push the stone to a resting place at the top of the hill.</p><p>As the date grew near there was much chatter on the street to the effect that malcontents from far and wide intended to disrupt the event -- or worse. We, of course, were going to make sure they'd have to go through us first. This would, in the best case scenario, have resulted in a terribly bloody skirmish or perhaps numerous ones; in the worst, we'd all go down in a blaze of glory and there would be a riot of proportions not seen in the Republic, or at least its capital, in anyone's memory.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/march_on_washington_glenn_beck_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/march_on_washington_glenn_beck_open2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do conservatives pretend &#8220;racism is dead&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/18/racist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/18/racist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/08/18/racist</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When James Taranto whitewashes right-wing bigotry, what is he telling us about his movement - and himself?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame to arrive late at a party, especially if you&#8217;re the designated pi&#241;ata. But last Friday, when WSJ.com&#8217;s <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703960004575427381953777918.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">James Taranto tried to take down</a> my <a href="http://www.observer.com/2010/opinion/racists-return">New York Observer column</a>, titled "The Racists Return," I had more pressing priorities.</p><p>What got the Journal blogger so wound up (along with others in the wingersphere) was my assertion that bigoted language uttered by the likes of Glenn Beck and Laura Ingraham has been echoed in racist &#8220;games&#8221; targeting President Obama on the Jersey Shore and in the Lehigh Valley this summer. What irked him even more was my suggestion that conservatives should at last repudiate such ugliness rather than encourage it.</p><p>Responding to those observations, Taranto accused me of misconstruing satire, tearing phrases from context, yearning for the '60s and, worst of all, lacking a sense of humor. No doubt he is among the most formidable wits on the right, but we just don&#8217;t share the same idea of funny. Unlike him, for instance, I wasn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.frumforum.com/james-taranto-is-sillier">amused by the right-wing smear</a> of Shirley Sherrod.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/18/racist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/18/racist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get your hands off MLK, Glenn Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/26/long_civil_rights_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/26/long_civil_rights_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirley Sherrod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/07/26/long_civil_rights_movement</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative pundits say they're protecting the legacy of our civil rights heroes. Little do they know...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a very long time, most Americans were very wrong about racial equality. This should go without saying -- after all, an idea that can command a majority doesn&#8217;t need sit-ins and freedom rides -- and yet it's gone missing from our understanding of our own history.</p><p>Certainly, the right-wing pundits who've taken to Fox News to attack the NAACP have warped the story. Glenn Beck <a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/43061/">has laughed off</a> the notion of Martin Luther King as a radical. "The Civil Rights Movement,"&#160;Beck <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/beck-says-progressives-co-opted-civi">says</a>, "has been co-opted by progressives." He's horrified by the idea that "you need civil unrest in order to meet demands" -- apparently forgetting that civil unrest is pretty literally what the Civil Rights Movement was. For guys like Beck, black people on the receiving end of fire-hoses and police dogs were sticking up for free enterprise. As he <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,597082,00.html">put it</a>, "It's the same rights that Abraham Lincoln and blacks and whites fought for in the Civil War. Those were the same rights that King fought for. Tonight, we're going to talk about those rights, individual rights." So, Lincoln and King:&#160;proto-libertarian individualists. Bull Connor and George Wallace, on the other hand? Probably liberal fascists. (Remember, they were Democrats!)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/26/long_civil_rights_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/26/long_civil_rights_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s gay marriage case nears closing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/us_gay_marriage_trial_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/us_gay_marriage_trial_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/12/us_gay_marriage_trial_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposition 8 trial arguments will address how homosexual nuptials impact discrimination, child rearing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawyers in the landmark federal trial over the constitutionality of California's gay marriage ban may have to check their dazzling oratory at the courtroom door during next week's closing arguments.</p><p>Chief U.S. Judge Vaughn Walker has given them a list of 39 questions he expects answered before he delivers his verdict.</p><p>After a months-long hiatus, Walker is scheduled to wrap the trial up on Wednesday.</p><p>Among Walker's questions for lawyers representing gay rights advocates and Proposition 8's sponsors are whether there is any proof that allowing gay men and lesbians to wed would reduce discrimination against them.</p><p>He also wants to know whether limiting marriage to a man and a woman improves the odds that children will be raised by a married mom and dad.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/us_gay_marriage_trial_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/us_gay_marriage_trial_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul, dorm room libertarian</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/rand_paul_dorm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/rand_paul_dorm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/07/rand_paul_dorm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kentucky Senate candidate quotes Kundera, gets the Americans With Disabilities Act wrong, blasts "Tom Sawyer"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kentucky Senate candidate Rand Paul <a href="http://www.bgdailynews.com/articles/2010/06/06/opinion/commentary/comm1.txt">took to the editorial page of a Kentucky newspaper to explain his political philosophy</a> without the annoyance of some interviewer badgering him to justify or defend his beliefs.</p><p>He supports the Civil Rights Act, he says. And he loves (and quotes) Martin Luther King.</p><p>According to Paul, the most pressing issue of 2010 -- the modern civil rights movement, if you will -- is protecting "the rights of people to be free from a nanny state." Just let that one sink in for a bit. Calorie counts on menus is Jim Crow redux and Michael Bloomberg is a modern-day Bull Connor:</p><blockquote>
<p>Now the media is twisting my small government message, making me out to be a crusader for repeal of the Americans for Disabilities Act and The Fair Housing Act. Again, this is patently untrue. I have simply pointed out areas within these broad federal laws that have financially burdened many smaller businesses.</p>
<p>For example, should a small business in a two-story building have to put in a costly elevator, even if it threatens their economic viability? Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to allow that business to give a handicapped employee a ground floor office? We need more businesses and jobs, not fewer.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/rand_paul_dorm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/rand_paul_dorm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Rand Paul might&#8217;ve just won over these Kentucky voters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/kentucky_voters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/kentucky_voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/20/kentucky_voters</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A classic 2008 YouTube clip explains why Rand needn't worry about a Civil Rights Act gaffe costing him too much]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This beloved 2008 video -- titled "Patriotic drunk rednecks" -- explains why coming out against the Civil Rights Act just mightl help Rand Paul win Kentucky: <object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Wroj0FLvzs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Wroj0FLvzs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></embed></object></p><p>These guys are Kentucky <em>Democrats.</em> I can only imagine how Rand would go about appealing to Kentucky <em>Republicans.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/kentucky_voters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/kentucky_voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel blocks Noam Chomsky&#8217;s entrance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/16/ml_israel_chomsky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/16/ml_israel_chomsky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/05/16/ml_israel_chomsky</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interior Ministry cites "various reasons" for not allowing the linguist to lecture in the West Bank]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Israeli official says academic and polemicist Noam Chomsky, who is a fierce critic of Israel, has been denied entry to the country.</p><p>Interior Ministry spokeswoman Sabine Haddad said Chomsky was turned away for "various reasons" but declined to elaborate. Chomsky was trying to cross the Allenby Bridge from Jordan. He was scheduled to deliver a lecture at Bir Zeit University in the West Bank.</p><p>Haddad said her ministry was looking into allowing him to enter only the West Bank.</p><p>Chomsky told Channel 10 TV from Jordan Sunday: "I've often spoken at Israeli universities."</p><p>Chomsky is one of Israel's harshest academic critics. After Israel's 2009 war in Gaza, he was quoted as saying, "supporters of Israel are in reality supporters of its moral degeneration."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/16/ml_israel_chomsky/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/16/ml_israel_chomsky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malcolm X assassin is freed on parole in N.Y.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/us_malcolm_x_killer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/us_malcolm_x_killer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/04/27/us_malcolm_x_killer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Hagan, the man who admitted to killing the civil rights leader, is released from a Manhattan prison]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK -- The only man to admit shooting Malcolm X was freed on parole Tuesday, 45 years after he assassinated the civil rights leader.</p><p>Thomas Hagan, the last man still serving time in the 1965 killing, was freed from a Manhattan prison where he spent two days a week under a work-release program, state Department of Correctional Services spokeswoman Linda Foglia said.</p><p>Hagan, 69, has said he was one of three gunmen who shot Malcolm X as he began a speech at Harlem's Audubon Ballroom on Feb. 21, 1965. But Hagan has said the two men convicted with him were not involved.</p><p>They maintained their innocence and were paroled in the 1980s. No one else has ever been charged.</p><p>The assassins gunned down Malcolm X out of anger at his split with the leadership of the Nation of Islam, the black Muslim movement for which he had once served as chief spokesman, said Hagan, who was then known as Talmadge X Hayer.</p><p>He has repeatedly expressed regret for his role in the assassination, which he described in a 2008 court filing as the deed of a young man who "acted out of rage on impulse and loyalty" to religious leaders.</p><p>"I've had a lot of time, a heck of a lot of time, to think about it," Hagan told a parole board last month, according to a transcript of the interview.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/us_malcolm_x_killer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/us_malcolm_x_killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protests rebuke Arizona immigration law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/25/us_immigration_enforcement_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/25/us_immigration_enforcement_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/04/25/us_immigration_enforcement_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thousands opposing the new Arizona immigration bill gather in Phoenix]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thousands of protesters descended on Arizona's Capitol Sunday to rally against a tough new immigration law they say will lead to police harassment of legal immigrants and U.S. citizens who look Hispanic.</p><p>Civil rights advocates have vowed to challenge the law in court, saying it would undoubtedly lead to racial profiling. The Rev. Al Sharpton said that just as freedom riders battled segregation in the 1960s, he would organize "freedom walkers" to challenge the Arizona bill.</p><p>"We will go to Arizona when this bill goes into effect and walk the streets with people who refuse to give identification and force arrest," Sharpton said Sunday in New York</p><p>Gov. Jan Brewer signed the bill into law Friday. It requires police to question people about their immigration status -- including asking for identification -- if they suspect someone is in the country illegally. The law also toughens restrictions on hiring illegal immigrants for day labor and knowingly transporting them.</p><p>Supporters have dismissed concerns of racial profiling, saying the law prohibits the use of race or nationality as the sole basis for an immigration check. Brewer has ordered state officials to develop a training course for officers to learn what constitutes reasonable suspicion someone is in the U.S. illegally.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/25/us_immigration_enforcement_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/25/us_immigration_enforcement_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

