<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Climate Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/climate_change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Would we give up burgers to stop climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report suggests that adjusting our diet can slow global warming. Now let's see if our politics will let us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed the news, humanity spent the Earth Day week reaching another sad milestone in the history of catastrophic climate change: For the first time, measurements of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere surpassed 400 parts per million, aka way above what our current ecosystem can handle.</p><p>Actually, you probably did miss the news because most major media outlets didn't cover it in a serious way, if at all. Instead, they and their audiences evidently view such information as far less news-, buzz- and tweet-worthy than (among other things) the opening of George W. Bush's library and President Obama's jokes at the White House Correspondents Dinner.</p><p>Such an appetite for distraction, no doubt, comes from both those who deny the problem of climate change and those who acknowledge the crisis but nonetheless look away from what feels like an unsolvable mess.</p><p>That sense of hopelessness is understandable. After all, some of the most hyped ways to reduce carbon emissions -- electric cars, mass-scale renewable energy power plants, etc. -- require the kind of technological transformations that can seem impossibly unrealistic at a time when Congress can't even pass a budget.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We tried to weaponize the weather</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/we_tried_to_weaponize_the_weather/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/we_tried_to_weaponize_the_weather/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cold War secrets: Melting polar ice cap with nukes, changing the sea level, even LSD weapons were all on the table]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The years between the ﬁrst hydrogen bomb tests and the Limited Test Ban Treaty in 1963 saw more than just increased anxiety about the eﬀects of nuclear testing on weather. They also saw increased interest in large-scale, purposeful environmental modiﬁcation. Most climate modiﬁcation enthusiasts spoke of increasing global temperatures, in the hopes that this would increase the quantity of cultivated land and make for fairer weather. Some suggested blackening deserts or snowy areas, to increase absorption of radiation. Covering large areas with carbon dust, so the theory went, would raise temperatures. Alternatively, if several hydrogen bombs were exploded underwater, they might evaporate seawater and create an ice cloud that would block the escape of radiation. Meteorologist Harry Wexler had little patience for those who wanted to add weather and climate modiﬁcation to the set of tools in man’s possession. But by 1958 even he acknowledged that serious proposals for massive changes, using nuclear weapons as tools, were inevitable. Like most professional meteorologists, in the past he had dismissed the idea that hydrogen bombs had aﬀected the weather. But with the prospect of determined experiments designed to bring about such changes, he warned of “the unhappy situation of the cure being worse than the ailment.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/we_tried_to_weaponize_the_weather/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/we_tried_to_weaponize_the_weather/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could a carbon fee save us from climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/could_a_carbon_fee_save_us_from_climate_change_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/could_a_carbon_fee_save_us_from_climate_change_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climatologist James Hansen explains how government can stave off global catastrophe -- and what we can do to help]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> It’s hard to imagine anyone who has done more to further our understanding of the impacts of climate change than Dr. James Hansen. After 46 years working a scientist and climatogolist for NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Hansen wasn’t content to simply catalog the dangers facing humanity and our planet — he has been ringing the alarm bell. “On a blistering June day in 1988 he was called before a Congressional committee and testified that human-induced global warming had begun,” the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/science/james-e-hansen-retiring-from-nasa-to-fight-global-warming.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">wrote</a> in a recent story about Hansen. “Speaking to reporters afterward in his flat Midwestern accent, he uttered a sentence that would appear in news reports across the land: ‘It is time to stop waffling so much and say that the evidence is pretty strong that the greenhouse effect is here.’”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/could_a_carbon_fee_save_us_from_climate_change_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/could_a_carbon_fee_save_us_from_climate_change_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer: Biblical flood proves climate change isn&#8217;t man-made</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/house_goper_biblical_flood_proves_climate_change_isnt_man_made/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/house_goper_biblical_flood_proves_climate_change_isnt_man_made/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["One would have to say the Great Flood is an example of climate change," said Rep. Joe Barton ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Joe Barton, a Republican from Texas, cited the Bible's Great Flood as an example of climate change that proves it's not necessarily man-made.</p><p>"I would point out that if you're a believer in the Bible, one would have to say the Great Flood is an example of climate change and that certainly wasn't because mankind had overdeveloped hydrocarbon energy," Barton said during a Subcommittee on Energy and Power hearing to discuss the Keystone XL pipeline, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/republican-congressman-cites-biblical-great-flood-to-say-cim">BuzzFeed</a> reports.</p><p>He also said that it doesn't necessarily mean he doesn't believe that the climate is changing: "I think you can have an honest difference of opinion of what's causing that change without automatically being either all in that's all because of mankind or it's all just natural. I think there's a divergence of evidence."</p><p>Barton, one of Congress's top recipients of oil company campaign donations, is perhaps best known for <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/18/nation/la-na-oil-barton-20100619">apologizing</a> to BP for what he called a White House "shakedown," after the Obama administration announced that it would set up a $20 billion escrow fund to benefit victims of the 2010 BP oil spill.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/house_goper_biblical_flood_proves_climate_change_isnt_man_made/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/house_goper_biblical_flood_proves_climate_change_isnt_man_made/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s forgotten agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obamas_forgotten_agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obamas_forgotten_agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the union 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He talked about urgent action on minimum wage and climate at the start of this term. A few months later: Nada]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two months ago this week, an emboldened President Obama laid out an ambitious agenda for a second term in his State of the Union address. Congress and the media have been consumed by important debates over a small array of those issues like gun control, immigration reform and the budget (which he'll unveil today). But other items critical to the progressive agenda of his second term -- especially raising the minimum wage and addressing climate change -- have largely fallen out of view.</p><p>And while it's still just a few months in, a look at these important but overshadowed goals, as he outlines his budget, does not suggest much progress -- or urgency.</p><p>“I urge this Congress to get together, pursue a bipartisan, market-based solution to climate change, like the one John McCain and Joe Lieberman worked on together a few years ago,” Obama thundered in the February speech, in an aggressive plea to address the crisis. “But if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obamas_forgotten_agenda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obamas_forgotten_agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Concern about global warming is growing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/poll_concern_about_global_warming_is_growing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/poll_concern_about_global_warming_is_growing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate skeptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But 41 percent say news about climate change is "exaggerated"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/161645/americans-concerns-global-warming-rise.aspx">Gallup poll</a> finds that more Americans are growing concerned about global warming, with 58 percent saying they "personally worry" about the effects of global warming at least a fair amount.</p><p>This is up from 51 percent in 2011.</p><p>From the poll:</p><blockquote><p>Public concern about global warming has waxed and waned over the past two decades, ranging between 50% and 72%. The average percentage over time for "worrying a great deal/fair amount" comes in at just under 60%, similar to the March 7-10 reading from Gallup's 2013 Environment poll.</p></blockquote><p>But the poll also finds that 15 percent believe that the effects of global warming will never happen, while 41 percent believe new reports about the subject are exaggerated.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/poll_concern_about_global_warming_is_growing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/poll_concern_about_global_warming_is_growing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Democrats destroy the planet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their inability to take a firm stance on issues like the Keystone XL pipeline helps enable global warming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, <em>Time</em> magazine <a href="http://swampland.time.com/2013/02/28/im-with-the-tree-huggers/" target="_blank">called</a> the fight over the Keystone XL pipeline that will bring some of the dirtiest energy on the planet from Alberta, Canada, to the U.S. Gulf Coast the “Selma and Stonewall” of the climate movement.</p><p>Which, if you think about it, may be both good news and bad news. Yes, those of us fighting the pipeline have mobilized record numbers of activists: the largest civil disobedience action <a href="http://action.sierraclub.org/site/PageServer?pagename=forwardonclimate" target="_blank">in 30 years</a> and 40,000 people on the mall in February for the biggest climate rally in American history. Right now, we’re aiming to get <a href="http://act.350.org/letter/a_million_strong_against_keystone/" target="_blank">a million people to send in public comments</a> about the “environmental review” the State Department is conducting on the feasibility and advisability of building the pipeline.  And there’s good reason to put pressure on.  After all, it’s the same State Department that, as on a previous round of reviews, <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/keystone-xl-contractor-ties-transcanada-state-department" target="_blank">hired</a> “experts” who had once worked as consultants for TransCanada, the pipeline’s builder.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: &#8220;Working together&#8221; won&#8217;t fix climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanford university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers say the best way to encourage activism is by emphasizing individual, rather than collective, action]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to climate change, we’re all in this dilemma together, and forcefully addressing it will require collaboration and cooperation. A stirring sentiment, but if you’re looking to spur white Americans to action, <a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/24/2/189.abstract" target="_blank">it’s actually counterproductive</a>.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>That’s the conclusion of a Stanford University research team, which found invoking the idea of interdependence undermined the motivation of European-American students to take a course in environmental sustainability.</p><p>The researchers, led by <a href="https://ccsre.stanford.edu/people-profiles/maryam-hamedani" target="_blank">MarYam Hamedani</a> of Stanford’s Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, argue that in mainstream European-American culture, independence functions as a “foundational schema” — that is, an underlying design or blueprint that guides behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh rewards child climate skeptic with an iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate skeptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The radio host explains that science has become a "branch of the Democrat Party"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On his show Thursday, Rush Limbaugh hosted a climate expert to explain how global warming is "a hoax." Sorry, did we say climate expert? We meant 13-year-old kid from Indiana. The young man called into Limbaugh's show and said he had done his own research at the local library for a school project and concluded that it was obvious that man-made climate change is bogus.</p><p>“It was really easy for me to find this evidence, really easy,” said young Alex. “I believe the reason that the liberals do not have the evidence [that it's a hoax] is because they do not want the evidence. They don't want to hear that it's wrong.”</p><p>Alex said he found all the information at the library, because he didn't have a computer. Limbaugh was so impressed that he told Alex he wanted to send him an iPad, assuming his parents were OK with it, in order to help him with future research.</p><p><a href="http://dailyrushbo.com/rush-the-hill-attacks-13-year-old-rush-caller-who-schooled-libs-on-global-warming-hoax/">Circling back today</a>, Limbaugh explained that "exactly as the news media is a branch of the Democrat Party, so too is much of science today." "The global warming scientists are just Democrats, folks. They're all part of an agenda," he continued, "The Democrats have literally politicized everything they can use to expand government, which is their primary objective."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change means mutant poison ivy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/ivy_plants_grow_larger_due_to_climate_change_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/ivy_plants_grow_larger_due_to_climate_change_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnEarth.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poison ivy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis Ziska]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research suggests that higher levels of carbon dioxide have caused the plant to grow larger and more poisonous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.onearth.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/OElogo-e1365090399191.png" alt="OnEarth" /></a> Back in college, I developed an oozing poison ivy rash all over my neck and arms and had to go on steroids -- just because I inadvertently grazed the clothes of a friend who had gone tromping through the woods earlier that day. What’s worse, it happened right before the Dalai Lama visited my school. While my classmates were leaning forward in their folding chairs to capture his every syllable, I was shifting in my seat, clutching a bottle of calamine lotion, and desperately trying to look calm while the Lama talked about peace of mind -- something I only know from reading the transcript. It’s hard to listen while your skin is on fire.</p><p>So yeah, I’m pretty allergic to poison ivy. But a lot of people are -- 80 percent of the population reacts to the vine with welts and maddeningly itchy rashes. So the fact that poison ivy plants are getting bigger and more poisonous due to climate change isn’t exactly welcome news. But that’s precisely what’s happening; <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/103/24/9086.full">scientific research</a> indicates that with higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the poison ivy plant grows larger, and its “oil” (a.k.a. the awful poisonous stuff) becomes more potent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/ivy_plants_grow_larger_due_to_climate_change_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/ivy_plants_grow_larger_due_to_climate_change_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Billionaire pledges to &#8220;destroy&#8221; climate skeptics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom steyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obscenely wealthy retired hedge fund manager will use strength of money in politics to environmental ends]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California billionaire Tom Steyer is setting himself up as a sort of anti-Koch. The retired hedge fund manager told the Hill that he will dedicate a fortune to fighting climate change through political donations -- "he wants to make climate change a campaign issue for years to come and Democratic support for environmental protections as widespread as support for gay marriage and immigration reform," noted the Hill.</p><p>Of course, activists concerned with campaign finance reform and the undue influence of money in politics will not welcome Steyer's pledge. Others might be pleased that the Koch support for climate skeptical policy will have a match. In the parlance appropriate to an aggressive financier, the green capitalist told the Hill that he planned to "destroy" climate skeptics and sought a "smashing victory." Via<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/291559-greens-get-billionaire-ally-money#ixzz2PQG9bYzy"> the Hill:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antarctic sea ice expanding</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/antarctic_sea_ice_expanding_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/antarctic_sea_ice_expanding_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that a summer melt caused by climate change has affected ice shelves in surprising ways]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a>  A summer melt caused by climate change is, counterintuitively, expanding Antarctic sea ice, scientists say.</p><p>A <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/benelux">Dutch</a> study <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/8494426/Antarctic-sea-ice-is-expanding" target="_blank">published online in the Nature Geoscience journal</a> said that sea ice around Antarctica has expanded at an accelerated rate of 1.9 percent per decade since 1985, unlike that in the Arctic region. It also notes that cool freshwater from melt underneath Antarctic ice shelves has insulated offshore sea ice from the ocean beneath, which is warming.</p><p>Because the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21991487" target="_blank">melt water has a relatively low density</a>, it accumulates in the top layer of the ocean, allowing for the cool surface waters to re-freeze more easily during fall and winter.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/antarctic_sea_ice_expanding_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/antarctic_sea_ice_expanding_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there anything 3-D printing can&#8217;t do?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/is_there_anything_3d_printing_cant_do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/is_there_anything_3d_printing_cant_do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d printers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microelectronics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13251427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop climate change? Create human organs? DIY hardware dreamers see few limits to their favorite technology]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another Monday, and according to Twitter, by the end of the week, 3-D printers will <a href="http://www.hw.ac.uk/news-events/news/printed-human-organs-testing-transplantation-11075.htm">be pumping out human organs,</a> saving <a href=" http://grist.org/climate-energy/can-we-3d-print-our-way-out-of-climate-change/">the world from climate change,</a> and revolutionizing nanoscale <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/news/511856/micro-3-d-printer-creates-tiny-structures-in-seconds/">micro-electronic manufacturing.</a></p><p>OK, "end of the week" might be a bit premature. Dig down deep on any of these news stories, and you will find a lot more in the way of "proof of concept" than actual 3-D manufactured reality. But it is still regularly amazing how fast the world of 3-D printing is moving. The "new hardware movement" is no joke. Advanced manufacturing technology is fast becoming a tool that can fit into any home or laboratory.</p><p>At Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, scientists have figured out how to "print" spheroids made of successive layers of embryonic stem cells using an "ink" that itself consists of stem cells.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/is_there_anything_3d_printing_cant_do/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/is_there_anything_3d_printing_cant_do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate science-denying GOPer to head climate subcommittee</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/climate_science_denying_goper_to_head_climate_subcommittee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/climate_science_denying_goper_to_head_climate_subcommittee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Science Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another day, another anti-science move by the House Science Committee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A House subcommittee on climate change announced that its new Chair will be Rep. Chris Stewart, a Republican from Utah who does not believe in man-made climate change, and who has written several end-times novels that were <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/chris-stewart-utah-republican">endorsed</a> by none other than Glenn Beck.</p><p>"I'm not as convinced as a lot of people are that man-made climate change is the threat they think it is," Stewart told the <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/56029666-90/climate-stewart-utah-committee.html.csp?page=1">Salt Lake Tribune</a>. "I think it is probably not as immediate as some people do."</p><p>As Tim Murphy from <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/chair-climate-change-subcommittee-jury-still-out-climate-change">Mother Jones</a> reports, Stewart is no big fan of the EPA or Endangered Species Act either:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/climate_science_denying_goper_to_head_climate_subcommittee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/climate_science_denying_goper_to_head_climate_subcommittee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio at CPAC: Liberals are &#8220;freeloaders&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rubio_at_cpac_science_has_proven_that_life_begins_at_conception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rubio_at_cpac_science_has_proven_that_life_begins_at_conception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a rousing CPAC speech, Rubio mocks climate change, says life begins at conception, and declares he's not a bigot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., offered up a serving of red meat to the audience at CPAC, reiterating his support for "traditional marriage," calling liberals "freeloaders," and stating his opposition to tax increases and abortion. "Science has proven that life begins at conception," he told the cheering crowd.</p><p>"Just because I want to define marriage in a traditional way does not make me a bigot," Rubio said, adding: "Just because I believe that life, all life, at all stages of development, deserves to be protected," does not make him closed-minded.</p><p>"The people who are closed-minded in our society are the ones who love to preach about climate science" but ignore that "science has proven that life begins at conception."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rubio_at_cpac_science_has_proven_that_life_begins_at_conception/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rubio_at_cpac_science_has_proven_that_life_begins_at_conception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phoenix may not survive climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/tk_5_partner_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/tk_5_partner_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Grid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Arizona city is almost entirely air-conditioned, and if our power grids fail, its people will fry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If cities were stocks, you’d want to short Phoenix.</p><p>Of course, it’s an easy city to pick on. The nation’s 13th largest metropolitan area (nudging out Detroit) crams 4.3 million people into a low bowl in a hot desert, where horrific heat waves and windstorms visit it regularly. It snuggles next to the nation’s largest nuclear plant and, having exhausted local sources, it depends on an improbable infrastructure to suck water from the distant (and dwindling) Colorado River.</p><p>In Phoenix, you don’t ask: What could go wrong? You ask: What couldn’t?<br /> <a name="more"></a><br /> And that’s the point, really. Phoenix’s multiple vulnerabilities, which are plenty daunting taken one by one, have the capacity to magnify one another, like compounding illnesses. In this regard, it’s a quintessentially modern city, a pyramid of complexities requiring large energy inputs to keep the whole apparatus humming. The urban disasters of our time -- New Orleans hit by Katrina, New York City swamped by Sandy -- may arise from single storms, but the damage they do is the result of a chain reaction of failures -- grids going down, levees failing, back-up systems not backing up. As you might expect, academics have come up with a <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=infrastructure+failure+interdependencies&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholart&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=6DMpUZD6Gs3uqAHQ3oHwDg&amp;ved=0CC4QgQMwAA" target="_blank">name</a> for such breakdowns: <em>infrastructure failure interdependencies</em>. You wouldn’t want to use it in a poem, but it does catch an emerging theme of our time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/tk_5_partner_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/tk_5_partner_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11 heinous lies conservatives are teaching America&#8217;s schoolchildren</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/11_heinous_lies_conservatives_are_teaching_americas_school_children_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/11_heinous_lies_conservatives_are_teaching_americas_school_children_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13227810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right has a new plan to capture the country's youth vote: Take over public school curriculums]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> If recent elections have taught us anything, it’s that young Americans have taken a decided turn to the left. Young voters delivered Obama the election: the under-44 set voted Obama and the over-45 set broke for Romney. The youngest voters, age 18-29, gave Obama a whopping 60 percent of their vote.</p><p>Now Republicans have a plan to try to recapture the youngest voters out there: Take over the curriculum in public schools, replace education with a bunch of conservative propaganda, and reap the benefits of having a new generation that can’t tell reality from right-wing fantasy.</p><p>How well this plan will work is debatable, but in the meantime, these shenanigans present the very real possibility that public school students will graduate without a proper education. To make it worse, many of these attempts to rewrite school curriculum are happening in Texas, <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/jun/21/how-texas-inflicts-bad-textbooks-on-us/?pagination=false" target="_blank">which can set the textbook standards for the entire country</a> by simply wielding its power as one of the biggest school textbook markets there is. With that in mind, here’s a list of 11 lies your kid may be in danger of learning in school.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/11_heinous_lies_conservatives_are_teaching_americas_school_children_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/11_heinous_lies_conservatives_are_teaching_americas_school_children_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>128</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forest Service decides to &#8220;let it burn&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/forest_service_is_shifting_the_controversial_firefighting_policy_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/forest_service_is_shifting_the_controversial_firefighting_policy_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnEarth.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildland Fire Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13222972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After an aggressive campaign to combat drought, the agency has elected to let more small fires burn themselves out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, as hot, dry conditions <a href="http://www.onearth.org/tag/western%20wildfires">fueled blazes across the West</a>, nearly 10 million acres of U.S. land were burned in what ended up being one of the costliest and most destructive wildfire seasons in the nation’s history. In the middle of all that, the U.S. Forest Service, which manages nearly 200 million acres of public land, didn’t do itself any favors when it reversed nearly two decades of national policy and <a href="http://www.onearth.org/article/forest-service-firefighting-policy-reversal">ordered an “aggressive initial attack”</a> on all blazes within the agency’s jurisdiction, no matter how small or remote.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.onearth.org/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/02/OElogo_500x55-e1360801074770.png" alt="OnEarth" align="left" /></a>This year, it appears the agency is moving back toward what ecologists and fire scientists have considered the best practices for almost 40 years now: fires that are sparked in remote wilderness, where they aren’t hurting anyone, should be allowed to burn. That’s because fire, as a natural part of the environment, is good for the ecosystem. Some essential animal and plant species actually thrive in fire-ravaged landscapes, and by thinning out excess timber and clearing out dry underbrush, small forest fires can help prevent large and deadlier blazes in the future.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/forest_service_is_shifting_the_controversial_firefighting_policy_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/forest_service_is_shifting_the_controversial_firefighting_policy_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change is our most difficult issue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/climate_change_is_our_most_difficult_issue_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/climate_change_is_our_most_difficult_issue_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why doesn't anybody seem to care?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Sundays ago, I traveled to the nation’s capital to attend what was billed as “the largest climate rally in history” and I haven’t been able to get the experience -- or a question that haunted me -- out of my mind. Where was everybody?</p><p>First, though, the obvious weather irony: climate change didn’t exactly come out in support of that rally. In the midst of the warmest years and some of the warmest winters on record, the demonstration, which focused on stopping the Keystone XL Pipeline -- it will bring tar-sands oil, some of the “dirtiest,” carbon-richest energy available from Alberta, Canada, to the U.S. Gulf Coast -- was the coldest I’ve ever attended. I thought I’d lose a few fingers and toes while listening to the hour-plus of speakers, including Senator Sheldon Whitehouse from Rhode Island, who were theoretically warming the crowd up for its march around the (other) White House.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/climate_change_is_our_most_difficult_issue_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/climate_change_is_our_most_difficult_issue_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia breaks hottest summer record</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/australia_breaks_hottest_summer_record_as_temperatures_rise_globally_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/australia_breaks_hottest_summer_record_as_temperatures_rise_globally_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More evidence of global warming: Aussies experienced their warmest January since 1910]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia weather bureau has confirmed that this country — like many others — has just sweltered through its hottest summer on record.</p><div> <p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a> <a href="http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1742160/Hottest-Australian-summer-on-record-BoM" target="_blank">The Australian Bureau of Meteorology reported</a> that records were broken for the average temperature and average daytime temperature between December and February.</p> <p>A record was also set for the number of consecutive days in which the average maximum was more than 39 degrees Celsius (102 degrees Farenheit) — namely the seven days from Jan. 2 to 8. The previous record was four days.</p> <p><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/breaking-news/bureau-confirms-hottest-summer-on-record/story-fn3dxiwe-1226588298573" target="_blank">The Australian Associated Press quoted</a> the bureau's climate change program manager, Tony Mohr, as saying:</p> <p>"If you're 27 years old, you've never experienced an 'average' month's temperature — it's all been above average."</p> <p>January 2013 was the hottest month recorded since 1910, Blair Trewin and Karl Braganza bureau wrote in a report, while records were also set for the hottest daytime temperatures averaged over the whole of Australia.</p> <p>In a year that saw several deadly wildfire outbreaks across the country, 14 locations deployed by the weather bureau to monitor the long-term climate registered individual record temperatures.</p> <p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/environment/summer-records-fall-after-long-heatwave-20130301-2f9xh.html#ixzz2MFGpyLqb" target="_blank">Australia's Fairfax media quoted</a> Trewin, a senior climatologist with the weather bureau, as saying:</p> <blockquote><p>"It was hot just about everywhere. It was in the top 10 for every mainland state. Six of the hottest 10 summers [nationally] have happened in the last decade."</p></blockquote> <p>The summer heat came despite much of Australia's eastern seaboard experienced flooding from two major storm systems, Fairfax noted.</p> <p>It cited Will Steffen, executive director of the Australian National University's Climate Change Institute, and a member of the Australian Climate Commission, as saying:</p> <blockquote><p>"It’s been a pretty amazing summer as far as extremes go. We had record high sea-surface temperatures along the east coast, leading to more evaporation and more moisture in the atmosphere available for rainfall."</p></blockquote> <p>The bureau said the summer followed a pattern of extremely hot summers around the world in recent years.</p> <p>Could any broader trend be drawn from the record-breaking Down Under summer of 2012-13?</p> <p>Trewin and Braganza wrote that the extremes fit with a well established trend in Australia:</p> <blockquote><p>"It’s getting hotter, and record heat is happening more often."</p></blockquote> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/australia_breaks_hottest_summer_record_as_temperatures_rise_globally_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/australia_breaks_hottest_summer_record_as_temperatures_rise_globally_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>