<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > CNN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/cnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 13:38:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Howard Kurtz&#8217;s contract with CNN under review</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/howard_kurtzs_contract_with_cnn_under_review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/howard_kurtzs_contract_with_cnn_under_review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coming out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sources say it's unlikely his contract will be renewed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN is reviewing "Reliable Sources" host Howard Kurtz's contract. The news, confirmed to The Hollywood Reporter by a spokesperson for the network, follows Tina Brown's announcement that the media reporter was let go from The Daily Beast two days ago.</p><p>Sources also told the <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/howard-kurtz-status-under-review-451106">Hollywood Reporter</a> that CNN is not likely to renew Kurtz's contract. "The network is also looking into Kurtz's involvement with the web site The Daily Download after media organizations raised the specter of a conflict of interest between Kurtz's day job and his freelance role at the site that was launched in February 2012," writes THR.</p><p>Kurtz <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/howard_kurtz_comes_out_as_illiterate/">was fired from the Daily Beast</a> after wrongly accusing NBA star Jason Collins, who made sports history for coming out as gay in Sports Illustrated this week, for not disclosing the fact that Collins was once engaged. (Collins stated that he was engaged early in the piece). The Daily Beast has since pulled the column and fired Kurtz, who has made serious reporting errors before, including a column in which he misquoted Rep. Darrell Issa's spokesman as Rep. Darrell Issa.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/howard_kurtzs_contract_with_cnn_under_review/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/howard_kurtzs_contract_with_cnn_under_review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>71 names so awful New Zealand had to ban them</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/71_names_so_awful_new_zealand_had_to_ban_them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/71_names_so_awful_new_zealand_had_to_ban_them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucifer. Mafia No Fear. "*" (!) What were these parents thinking?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a> You thought "<a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_15765_the-20-most-bizarre-celebrity-baby-names.html" target="_blank">Apple</a>" and "<a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/egypt/110221/egypt-facebook-wael-ghonim">Facebook</a>" were bad?</p><p>Some New Zealand parents were getting so creative devising unique names for their newborns that the country's Department of Internal Affairs has stepped in to stop the shenanigans.</p><p>New Zealand released an official list of rejected names on Wednesday that includes "4Real," "Mafia No Fear" and "Anal." Other gems — like "." and "*" — didn't even bother with the alphabet. All of the names on the list were at some point proposed by parents, soon to be rejected by the government, which deemed the names too offensive.</p><p>In some cases, <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130501/4real-new-zealand-reveals-banned-baby-names" target="_blank">parents appeared to have lost any inspiration</a> for coming up with a moniker for their offspring, naming the family's latest addition simply "2nd", "3rd" or "5th."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/71_names_so_awful_new_zealand_had_to_ban_them/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/71_names_so_awful_new_zealand_had_to_ban_them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dzhokhar Tsarnaev scrubbed online presence before bombings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/dzhokhar_tsarnaev_scrubbed_online_presence_before_bombings_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/dzhokhar_tsarnaev_scrubbed_online_presence_before_bombings_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to family friends, the bombing suspect deleted his Instagram account two weeks prior to the attacks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailydot.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/dailydot_square-e1364842032669.png" alt="The Daily Dot" align="left" /></a> Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev had an Instagram account he deleted before the attacks took place two weeks ago, <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/26/tech/tsarnaev-instagram-account/index.html?c=&amp;page=1">according to friends</a>.</p><p>Tsarnaev apparently <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/26/tech/tsarnaev-instagram-account/index.html?c=&amp;page=1">used the account</a>, @jmaister1, to like a photo of a deceased Chechen warlord. He also liked photos that used hashtags such as #FreeChechenia, #Jihad, #Jannah, #ALLAH, #Jesus, and #God.</p><p>While the account is gone, CNN was able to find some of the content posted to it using archiving tools like Google's Web cache.</p><p>In its Terms of Service, Instagram says that if subpoenaed, it will turn over users' information. However, it notes that the information might only be stored for a short time due to the volume of content that floods the service.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/dzhokhar_tsarnaev_scrubbed_online_presence_before_bombings_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/dzhokhar_tsarnaev_scrubbed_online_presence_before_bombings_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN&#8217;s &#8220;Crossfire&#8221; talk shows CNN still doesn&#8217;t get what&#8217;s wrong with CNN</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/cnns_crossfire_talks_show_cnn_still_doesnt_get_whats_wrong_with_cnn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/cnns_crossfire_talks_show_cnn_still_doesnt_get_whats_wrong_with_cnn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephanie Cutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossfire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you were hoping for the new incarnation to be smarter, CNN is talking to Newt Gingrich and Stephanie Cutter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN would like you to know that under Jeff Zucker's leadership, it will continue being as CNN-y as possible. That's the message I'm getting from the report that the struggling cable news channel is planning to relaunch political shouting program "Crossfire" and is <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/04/cnn-in-talks-with-newt-gingrich-stephanie-cutter-for-162439.html">"in talks" with Newt Gingrich and Stephanie Cutter.</a> Gingrich! Finally, Lincoln-Douglas-style "Crossfire."</p><p>This is at this point pretty thin. "Talks" doesn't mean much. Gingrich and Cutter might be part of a whole bench of hosts. But it does suggest that CNN is going about a "Crossfire" launch in just about the worst way possible. Those hoping for a smarter version of the old show will definitely be disappointed.</p><p>Stephanie Cutter has spent her entire career as a campaign flack. Her job has been, for years, to spin reporters. (This job leads to becoming a political news media professional strangely often.) Regardless of her intelligence and her ability to speak extemporaneously on camera, she has never demonstrated an ability to be an interesting, independent thinker, and it is fair to predict that as a TV pundit she'd be representing "The Democratic Party" and not "liberalism."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/cnns_crossfire_talks_show_cnn_still_doesnt_get_whats_wrong_with_cnn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/cnns_crossfire_talks_show_cnn_still_doesnt_get_whats_wrong_with_cnn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN to bring &#8220;Crossfire&#8221; back &#8230; with Newt Gingrich?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/cnn_to_bring_crossfire_back_with_newt_gingrich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/cnn_to_bring_crossfire_back_with_newt_gingrich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephanie Cutter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter gets another reason to laugh at the network, which is still recovering from its shoddy coverage last week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still dealing with a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/cnns_john_king_on_boston_bombing_news_coverage_we_made_a_mistake/">major journalistic failure</a> on its hands, CNN has managed to distract the nation from its sloppy reporting with news that it may bring political talk show "Crossfire" back -- with Stephanie Cutter and Newt Gingrich as hosts.</p><p>Although a source told <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/04/cnn-in-talks-with-newt-gingrich-stephanie-cutter-for-162439.html?hp=f2">Politico</a> that CNN is only having talks with the Obama adviser and former speaker of the House, Twitter ran with the rumor:</p><p>[embedtweet id="326795862279856128"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="326796770199883776"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="326799282776731651"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="326795631685419010"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="326794451043373056"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="326800593618358273"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="326800016192708608"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/cnn_to_bring_crossfire_back_with_newt_gingrich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/cnn_to_bring_crossfire_back_with_newt_gingrich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN&#8217;s John King on Boston bombing news coverage: &#8220;We made a mistake&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/cnns_john_king_on_boston_bombing_news_coverage_we_made_a_mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/cnns_john_king_on_boston_bombing_news_coverage_we_made_a_mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon bombing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It's my city, too, so it's sort of a double kick in the head to me," King said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sloppy_news_coverage_becomes_news_after_cnn_misreports_arrest/">Media reporters</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_cnns_frantic_news_coverage/">comedy networks</a> have been laughing at CNN's continuously sloppy news coverage of the Boston bombings, which began on Wednesday when the overeager network erroneously reported the arrest of a "dark-skinned male."</p><p>On Tuesday, CNN chief national correspondent John King -- a Boston native -- addressed the network's blunder, telling D.C. radio station WTOP, "The one thing you have to do is look straight in the camera and say, 'We were wrong.'"</p><p>"It's my city, too, so it's sort of a double kick in the head to me," King said. "But, the best way to deal with it is to say 'We made a mistake. Here's how we made a mistake.' And then move on."</p><p>He <a href="http://www.wtop.com/1326/3296052/CNNs-King-says-mistakes-last-week-were-embarrassing">explained</a> that he relied on two sources "who have been reputable in the past who simply had bad information."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/cnns_john_king_on_boston_bombing_news_coverage_we_made_a_mistake/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/cnns_john_king_on_boston_bombing_news_coverage_we_made_a_mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Jon Stewart rips CNN&#8217;s Boston coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_cnns_frantic_news_coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_cnns_frantic_news_coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon bombing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The network stayed on the scene in Watertown, Mass., despite having nothing new to report ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"If there's one thing you can say for this network, it's that they were there," Jon Stewart said dubiously about CNN's chaotic news coverage of the manhunt in Boston last week.</p><p>When other networks switched over to news anchors, CNN stayed on the scene in Watertown, Mass., despite having no news to report:</p><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;"> <div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:425666" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p> <p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-april-22-2013/this-is-cnn-">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br /> Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision">Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_cnns_frantic_news_coverage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_cnns_frantic_news_coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tsarnaev: My brother wanted to defend Islam</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/tsarnaev_my_brother_wanted_to_defend_islam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/tsarnaev_my_brother_wanted_to_defend_islam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 02:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN reports that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev denies being part of any larger terrorist network]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving suspect in the Boston Marathon attack, told federal investigators today that his brother, Tamerlan, was largely behind the bombing, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/22/us/boston-attack/index.html?hpt=hp_t1">CNN reported</a> this evening.</p><p>CNN -- which <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/22/business/media/in-boston-cnn-stumbles-in-rush-to-break-news.html">erroneously reported Wednesday</a> that an arrest in the case had been made -- <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/22/us/boston-attack/index.html?hpt=hp_t1">cited </a>a U.S. government source.</p><p>The network <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/22/us/boston-attack/index.html?hpt=hp_t1">reports </a>that:</p><blockquote><p>Preliminary interviews with Dzhokhar Tsarnaev indicate the two brothers fit the classification of self-radicalized jihadists, the source said. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, wounded and held in a Boston hospital, said his brother wanted to defend Islam from attack, according to the source.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/tsarnaev_my_brother_wanted_to_defend_islam/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/tsarnaev_my_brother_wanted_to_defend_islam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>214</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest myths from the Boston Marathon bombing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/biggest_myths_from_the_boston_marathon_bombing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/biggest_myths_from_the_boston_marathon_bombing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston marathon explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston marathon bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Emerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN wrong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From "false flag" paranoia to alleged Saudi ties, the worst fear-mongering to come out of the Boston tragedy ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The still-emerging facts of the Boston Marathon bombing case are harrowing enough, but that didn't stop conspiracy theorists, detective-wannabes on the Internet and too-quick-to-the-draw cable news outlets from circulating paranoid, intentionally misleading and otherwise inaccurate reports to feed a frenzied news cycle hungry for information -- accuracy be damned.</p><p>From Glenn Beck to John King, a roundup of the very worst coverage on the tragedy in Boston:</p><p><strong>Alex Jones and the "false flag" conspiracy </strong></p><p>As Salon's Alex Seitz-Wald previously <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/alex_jones_labels_boston_explosion_a_false_flag/" target="_blank">reported</a>, Alex Jones and others on the conservative fringe wasted no time in launching paranoid theories pinning the Boston tragedy to an elaborate government plot:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/biggest_myths_from_the_boston_marathon_bombing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/biggest_myths_from_the_boston_marathon_bombing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN&#8217;s Zucker congratulates staff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/cnns_zucker_congratulates_staff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/cnns_zucker_congratulates_staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Zucker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf Blitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13277852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["And when we made a mistake..."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN was <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sloppy_news_coverage_becomes_news_after_cnn_misreports_arrest/">widely mocked</a> during the most intense news week of CNN Worldwide president Jeff Zucker's short tenure there. But the former NBC executive saw much to like in the network's coverage of the Boston bombings and their aftermath. The Hollywood Reporter <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/jeff-zucker-boston-memo-you-443127">obtained</a> his memo to staff:</p><blockquote><p>What a week.</p> <p>As events unfolded in Boston, and then in Texas, and as they continue to unfold at this very moment in both places, CNN has been there for our audience in every possible way – on television, online and on our mobile platforms. As Wolf would say, that was true for our audiences here in the United States and around the world. For journalists like each of us, these are the times that define what we do and why we do it. All of you, across every division of CNN Worldwide, have done exceptional work. And when we made a mistake, we moved quickly to acknowledge it and correct it. It was important to see CNN, CNN.com, HLN and CNNI all shine this week, often with different stories and different approaches that make each of their roles clear. It is a week that began with a whole new genre of programming for CNN, with the successful premiere of Parts Unknown. Now, as the week comes to a close, I wanted to express my deep gratitude and admiration. You have worked tirelessly, around the clock, to share these stories. And our audiences have responded, making it clear that they rely on us in ever increasing ways. In front of the cameras and behind the scenes, you have shown the world what makes us CNN.</p> <p>With my thanks and appreciation,</p> <p>JEFF</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/cnns_zucker_congratulates_staff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/cnns_zucker_congratulates_staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sprinting, sloppy TV news coverage of the Boston manhunt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/the_sprinting_sloppy_tv_news_coverage_of_the_boston_manhunt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/the_sprinting_sloppy_tv_news_coverage_of_the_boston_manhunt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The false need for speed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you woke up after 7:30 EDT this morning, there have been no new developments in the manhunt for Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev, the white-hat-wearing 19-year-old suspect in the Boston bombing, since you got out of bed. If you have been following the story closely on television — or Twitter — it most certainly feels like this could not be the case. Over the past nine hours, news coverage has been in a flat-out sprint, continuous and unending, huffing and puffing to supply us with the latest news when there is no new latest news. The news networks are treading water but trying to make it look like they are free-styling by hysterically flailing their arms in a forward motion. At one of the rare moments when there is a huge, breaking news story, TV news is having just as rocky, sloppy and manipulative a time filling its schedule as when it is struggling to find stories to cover. How can this be?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/the_sprinting_sloppy_tv_news_coverage_of_the_boston_manhunt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/the_sprinting_sloppy_tv_news_coverage_of_the_boston_manhunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN: Unreleased footage shows suspects watched explosions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/cnn_unreleased_footage_shows_suspects_watched_explosions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/cnn_unreleased_footage_shows_suspects_watched_explosions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston explosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston marathon suspects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal law enforcement source tells CNN that the two suspects watched carnage unfold, then walked away casually]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/18/us/boston-blasts/index.html">reports</a> this evening that federal investigators have much more footage of the two men wanted in relation to the Boston Marathon bombing -- and that some of that footage is shocking.</p><p>A federal law enforcement source "with knowledge of the investigation" <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/18/us/boston-blasts/index.html">told the network</a> that the suspects stayed and watched as the two bombs exploded, then simply walked away from the horrific scene.</p><p>"When the bombs blow up, when most people are running away and victims were lying on the ground, the two suspects walk away pretty casually," said the source -- who CNN reported has seen the footage.</p><p>Officials found the behavior noticeable, the source said, because "they acted differently than everyone else."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/cnn_unreleased_footage_shows_suspects_watched_explosions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/cnn_unreleased_footage_shows_suspects_watched_explosions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston aftermath brings out America&#8217;s worst prejudices</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/boston_aftermath_brings_out_americas_worst_prejudices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/boston_aftermath_brings_out_americas_worst_prejudices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between a Saudi student's profiling and irresponsible CNN and NY Post reports, our nation's bigotry is on display]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a country that so often purports to be color blind, that insists too many people of color are overly obsessed with race, and that claims to live up to Dr. King's dream of not judging people "by the color of their skin but by the content of their character," the last two days have revealed a much uglier reality. They have revealed that -- "doth protest too much" claims to the contrary -- America is anything but color blind, that too many white folk are the ones obsessed with race, and that Dr. King's dream is still just that: a distant dream. And that's not just a general truism that is irrelevant to this moment of national emergency -- it is, on the contrary, a very specific point that <em>must</em> be made, right now, precisely <em>because of</em> that national emergency.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/boston_aftermath_brings_out_americas_worst_prejudices/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/boston_aftermath_brings_out_americas_worst_prejudices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>163</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aaron Brown on CNN&#8217;s bad day: John King will &#8220;have the hardest time sleeping tonight&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/aaron_brown_on_cnns_bad_day_john_king_will_have_the_hardest_time_sleeping_tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/aaron_brown_on_cnns_bad_day_john_king_will_have_the_hardest_time_sleeping_tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aaron brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john king]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former CNN anchor tells Salon about the "tremendous pressure" in the "inherently conservative" net's newsroom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After CNN was forced to walk back John King's reporting that an arrest had been made in connection to the Boston Marathon bombing, Aaron Brown (an anchor at CNN until 2005, including on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001) was sympathetic.</p><p>"No one who does this in a breaking news environment has not had this happen. You feel that you've let down the organization and the audience. It is a very difficult moment."</p><p>Brown, who is now a professor at Arizona State University, told Salon that his students had asked about the King reporting throughout the day. "I told them it never would have happened this badly on my watch," he joked, before turning serious. "The role of the anchor is to say: This is true. And these things are very chaotic. [CNN should have indicated] 'What we can say for sure is that the case moved significantly today." Brown suggested that King and NBC News' Pete Williams were using sources from entirely different spheres, with Williams operating with federal sources in Washington, while "my guess is that [King] was getting stuff from local or law enforcement or courthouse people; his sources were state people."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/aaron_brown_on_cnns_bad_day_john_king_will_have_the_hardest_time_sleeping_tonight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/aaron_brown_on_cnns_bad_day_john_king_will_have_the_hardest_time_sleeping_tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN&#8217;s Boston embarrassment: How a &#8220;scoop&#8221; turns sour</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/cnns_boston_embarrassment_how_a_scoop_turns_sour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/cnns_boston_embarrassment_how_a_scoop_turns_sour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN wrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon suspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN reported that a Boston bombing suspect was in custody, followed by Fox and AP. Here's how it all went wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 12:04 p.m., CNN's Breaking News Twitter broadcast that a "suspect" in the bombing of the Boston Marathon had been "ID'd."</p><p>[embedtweet id="324569129187168257"]</p><p>This scoop was credited to CNN reporter John King, who, as of this writing, is not on air. Less than an hour later, CNN declared there had been an arrest.</p><p>[embedtweet id="324582239134416897"]</p><p>Other news outlets chased CNN, with the Associated Press and Fox News reporting a similar story shortly after 1 p.m. in each case.</p><p>[embedtweet id="324583755350147072"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324584418196983809"]</p><p>But by 1:43, CNN had cited the Department of Justice and Boston Police Department in their claim that no arrest was made.</p><p>[embedtweet id="324593940223385600"]</p><p>CNN's tweets about the events in Boston today link to a <a href="http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2013/04/17/source-arrest-made-in-boston-bombing/">liveblog</a> whose URL ends "source-arrest-made-in-boston-bombing/." King's reporting for CNN, preserved in the liveblog, indicates that the police "identified a suspect based on an analysis of video from a Lord &amp; Taylor department store near the site of the second blast, and that video from a Boston TV station also helped."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/cnns_boston_embarrassment_how_a_scoop_turns_sour/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/cnns_boston_embarrassment_how_a_scoop_turns_sour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sloppy news coverage becomes news after CNN misreports arrest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sloppy_news_coverage_becomes_news_after_cnn_misreports_arrest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sloppy_news_coverage_becomes_news_after_cnn_misreports_arrest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN incorrectly reported an arrest in the Boston case, and Twitter went nuts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As media outlets continue to monitor the Boston Marathon bombing case around the clock for updates, a few <del datetime="2013-04-17T19:09:27+00:00">gossip sites</del> news outlets <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/the_onion_satirizes_new_york_posts_poor_sourcing_over_boston_explosion/singleton/">jumped the gun</a>, making up news to report before real news actually happened.</p><p>After <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/2013/04/17/boston-medical-center-reports-five-year-old-boy-critical-condition-victims-treated-from-boston-marathon-bombings/UiktKly60y4m8UVHeNu8NP/story.html">officials discovered a video from Lord &amp; Taylor</a> with an image of a suspect, conflicting reports emerged on the status of the case. This afternoon, the AP and CNN misreported that a suspect had been arrested in the Boston explosion case, with CNN even citing the person in custody as a "dark-skinned male" while CBS said Boston police were searching for a white male. NBC and CBS said no arrests had been made and CNN and the AP later backtracked on the arrest claims, saying federal sources deny that a suspect is in custody.</p><p>Twitter had a field day:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324593875773710336"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324592533168607232"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sloppy_news_coverage_becomes_news_after_cnn_misreports_arrest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sloppy_news_coverage_becomes_news_after_cnn_misreports_arrest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Ricin letters are appearing around official Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/ricin_found_in_senators_mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/ricin_found_in_senators_mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: Obama received tainted mail as well, but there's a suspect in mind]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE 4/17 12:20 p.m.</p><p>In his press conference, White House spokesman Jay Carney confirmed that a letter with a suspicious substance had been sent to President Obama but referred further questions to the FBI. He also referred questions about the Boston attack investigation to the FBI.</p><p>UPDATE 4/17 11:36 a.m.</p><p>The AP is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/police_reportedly_have_suspect_in_ricin_case_ap/">reporting</a> that authorities have a suspect in mind but didn’t say much more:</p><blockquote><p>Police have a suspect in mind as they investigate a letter mailed to Sen. Roger Wicker that tested positive for poisonous ricin, a Senate colleague said.</p> <p>“The person that is a suspect writes a lot of letters to members,” Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said Tuesday as she emerged from a classified briefing.</p></blockquote><p>UPDATE: 4/17 11:28 a.m.</p><p>The president may have received one as well:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324542621190082560"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324540615671050240"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>UPDATE: 4/17 10:50 a.m.</p><p>ABC News' Terry Moran tweeted:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324532498770059264"]</p><p>UPDATE No. 2: Politico is now reporting that a suspect in the case has been identified.</p><p>From Glenn Thrush:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324295535550943233"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/ricin_found_in_senators_mail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/ricin_found_in_senators_mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston Marathon bombing: Why early reports are wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/boston_marathon_bombing_why_early_reports_are_wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/boston_marathon_bombing_why_early_reports_are_wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jane harman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five bombs in Boston, a car bomb on 9/11 -- when stressed, our brains start to conflate fact and fiction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the car bomb at the State Department on Sept. 11, 2001?</p><p>Of course not -- there was no such thing. But amid the fear and chaos of that day, that was among the many rumors that spread quickly, making the early coverage of the day's tragedy seem all the more dramatic and upsetting.</p><p>False information also spread yesterday. There was former congresswoman <a href="http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/392287/Thatcher-funeral-and-London-Marathon-WILL-go-ahead-after-Boston-Marathon-bombing">Jane Harman</a> on CNN, warning of additional attacks because "A signature of al-Qaida is simultaneous attacks." Never mind that we still don't know who was behind the bombing. The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/ny-post-boston-bombings_n_3092814.html">New York Post</a> cited 12, rather than the two deaths first confirmed by officials. And the question of just how many "unexploded devices" there were in the city of Boston hung over the day, as this <a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/explosions-rock-boston-marathon-unexploded-devices-reportedly-found">Examiner piece</a> extrapolating from a Bloomberg News tweet proves.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/boston_marathon_bombing_why_early_reports_are_wrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/boston_marathon_bombing_why_early_reports_are_wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Stockman demands Wolf Blitzer apologize</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/steve_stockman_demands_wolf_blitzer_apologize/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/steve_stockman_demands_wolf_blitzer_apologize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Stockman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf Blitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House Republican falsely accused Blitzer of using the "killings to attack political opponents"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolf Blitzer was swiftly attacked on Monday for suggesting that there could be a link between the attacks in Boston and Patriots' Day, which many on Twitter, Steve Stockman included, assumed meant that he was linking the attacks to Tea Party groups.</p><p>Blitzer <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/dorsey/wolf-blitzer-did-not-blame-the-tea-party-for-boston-explosio">did not</a>, in fact, mention the Tea Party, but said: “One intriguing notion, one intriguing thought here, and I’m curious, Mike, and I’ll ask Matt to weigh in as well. It is a state holiday, in addition to the Boston Marathon. It is a state holiday in Massachusetts today called Patriots' Day, and who knows if that has anything at all to deal — to do with these, these twin explosions.”</p><p>Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas, demanded on Monday that Blitzer apologize, picking up on the false narrative that Blitzer's comments had politicized the attack:</p><p>[embedtweet id="323910146973638657"]</p><p>Blitzer responded on Tuesday:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324168903255289856"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/steve_stockman_demands_wolf_blitzer_apologize/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/steve_stockman_demands_wolf_blitzer_apologize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do improvised explosive devices work?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/how_do_improvised_explosive_devices_work_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/how_do_improvised_explosive_devices_work_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJ Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two IEDs were detonated in the marathon attacks. An expert explains how they can lead us back to the bomb makers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/page.cfm?section=rss"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> The bombing near the finish line of the 117th <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/dozens-people-injured-explosion-boston-marathon-190955311.html" target="_blank">Boston Marathon on Monday</a> killed two and injured more than 100 people on site. Now comes the search for who planted and detonated the explosives, and the motive.</p><p>The first bomb was detonated at about 2:45 P.M. local time near one of the many classic storefronts lining the marathon’s home stretch. The second explosive followed within minutes about 50 to 100 yards away. Law enforcement later found and dismantled at least two more explosive devices, according to various news reports.</p><p>Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) such as those used to attack the marathon are sometimes triggered remotely by cell phones. The <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/official-cellphone-service-shut-down-boston" target="_blank">Associated Press initially reported</a> that law enforcement had the cell network in the vicinity of the finish line shut down after the incident, but later reports contradicted this, indicating that problems receiving a signal were due to the volume of cell phone users on the network.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/how_do_improvised_explosive_devices_work_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/how_do_improvised_explosive_devices_work_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>