<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > CNN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/cnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Kirk Cameron &#8220;brave&#8221; to condemn gays?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/05/is_kirk_cameron_brave_to_condemn_gays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/05/is_kirk_cameron_brave_to_condemn_gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piers Morgan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12483051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Piers Morgan defends the actor's anti-homosexual stance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/8_piers_morgan/">Piers Morgan</a> call you brave is like having Rick Santorum call you smart. You've got to consider the source. So when the CNN host and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/20/piers_morgan_murdoch/">Murdoch apologist</a> told TMZ what he thought about former "Growing Pains" actor turned <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/kirk_cameron/">evolution naysayer</a> Kirk Cameron's comments on Morgan's show Friday night, Morgan was restrained to the point of admiring.<a href="http://www.tmz.com/videos/0_p42vlsfx"> "He was honest to what he believed,"</a> Morgan said. "It's a very contentious issue. I think that he was pretty brave to say what he said."</p><p>And what, precisely, were Cameron's bold remarks? When prodded on the subject of same-sex marriage on Morgan's CNN show, the Christianity-themed movie star and father of six said that "I believe that marriage was defined by God a long time ago…. Do I support the idea of gay marriage? No, I don't." And when Morgan asked if he thought homosexuality was a sin, Cameron hedged a bit, refusing to use the word "sin" but declaring, "It's unnatural, it's detrimental and ultimately destructive to so many of the foundations of civilization." Maybe "sin" would have been a nicer way of putting it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/05/is_kirk_cameron_brave_to_condemn_gays/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/05/is_kirk_cameron_brave_to_condemn_gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>146</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolf Blitzer writes perfect political blog post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/23/wolf_blitzer_writes_perfect_political_blog_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/23/wolf_blitzer_writes_perfect_political_blog_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf Blitzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12414821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN anchor predicts election will involve lots of disagreements and possibly impolite exchanges of words]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know that computer program <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/the-robots-are-coming-oh-theyre-here/">that automatically generates baseball game reports</a> based on box scores? Wolf Blitzer is like an extremely primitive and unsophisticated version of that, for political news. (Or "news.") <a href="http://situationroom.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/23/blitzers-blog-its-going-to-get-nasty/">Today, the CNN anchor takes to "Blitzer's Blog"</a> to report that the 2012 election campaign has been very intense. He also predicts that it will get more intense later, when it gets closer to the general election.</p><blockquote><p><b>BLITZER'S BLOG: It’s going to get nasty!</b></p>
<p>By <b>Wolf Blitzer</b>, CNN<br />
(CNN) – If you think it’s been a rough ride for the Republican candidates during this current campaign season, just wait. This will be seen as child’s play once the general election campaign begins.</p>
<p>I’ve said this before but I’ll say it again: the war of words between President Obama and his campaign supporters versus the eventual Republican nominee and his supporters will be fierce.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/23/wolf_blitzer_writes_perfect_political_blog_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/23/wolf_blitzer_writes_perfect_political_blog_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nancy Grace is more terrible than ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/15/nancy_grace_is_more_terrible_than_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/15/nancy_grace_is_more_terrible_than_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitney Houston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12364181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wild and unfounded speculation about Whitney Houston's death is a new low for the HLN host]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cable news depends on colorful characters to draw eyeballs in between those reminders that there are "no new developments" in the real stories of the day. But even in <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">a sea of distinctive jerkwads</a> – your Erin Burnetts and Piers Morgans and Bill O'Reillys and Megyn Kellys --  HLN host Nancy Grace never fails to distinguish herself. And just when you think she can't find new depths to plumb, along comes the Whitney Houston story.</p><p>Grace, the woman who has made an entire cottage industry out of her indignation over Casey Anthony, who paints herself nightly as the avenging angel of poor dead Caylee, has never been one to trade in subtlety -- or, for that matter, facts. CNN had to <a href="http://blogs.ajc.com/radio-tv-talk/2010/11/08/melinda-ducketts-family-drops-suit-against-cnnnancy-grace/">settle</a> a wrongful death suit after the mother of a missing child killed herself after being browbeaten on her show. (The parties agreed that Grace "engaged in no intentional wrongdoing.") She fearlessly championed the prosecution's side <a href="http://youtu.be/rtWNVxnmG_4 ">in the Duke lacrosse team rape case</a>, blithely referring to "the victim," and went ballistic over the very notion that the accused might be innocent. (She then conveniently remained quiet on the subject after the case was dismissed.) This, folks, is a woman who has<a href="http://youtu.be/am0uJkRSMNw "> guilt-tripped abduction victim Elizabeth Smart</a> for not playing along with her interview tactics. And even after a jury found <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/nancy_grace_caylee_anthony_verdict/">Casey Anthony not guilty</a> last summer, she has held on to the story like a dog with a bone, insisting that "I told the truth," luxuriating in descriptions of "the backdrop of 2-year-old Caylee's decomposing body just a few houses down from where Tot Mom put her pillow every night," and excoriating Anthony for – rich irony alert –<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/our_creepy_endless_fascination_with_casey_anthony/">"generating interest in herself." </a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/15/nancy_grace_is_more_terrible_than_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/15/nancy_grace_is_more_terrible_than_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolf Blitzer presents &#8220;A salute to politicians&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/wolf_blitzer_presents_a_salute_to_politicians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/wolf_blitzer_presents_a_salute_to_politicians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf Blitzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12086501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN anchor can't help admiring those brave, hardworking candidates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolf Blitzer, the face and droning monotonous voice of CNN's breaking news coverage, has written the finest blog post of the year, so far. Blitzer has penned "A salute to politicians," <a href="http://situationroom.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/10/blitzers-blog-a-salute-to-politicians/?on.cnn=1&amp;hpt=hp_t2">because, really, someone had to.</a></p><p>"I know it will probably sound weird," Blitzer begins, "but I admire these politicians who put themselves out there before the American public knowing full well that all their warts will be exposed big time." We have a breaking news alert for you here in the Situation Room: Situation Room anchor Wolf Blitzer admires members of the political ruling elite.</p><p>Politicians, you see, should be admired, because even though they are by and large rich, they still work very hard, every couple years. So says Wolf Blitzer in his essay on politicians, "I admire politicians, by Wolf Blitzer."</p><blockquote><p>Most of them already have lots of money. They could easily coast at this point in their lives and sit back and relax.</p>
<p>Instead, they are working hard on the campaign trail.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/wolf_blitzer_presents_a_salute_to_politicians/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/wolf_blitzer_presents_a_salute_to_politicians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our creepy, endless fascination with Casey Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/our_creepy_endless_fascination_with_casey_anthony/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/our_creepy_endless_fascination_with_casey_anthony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casey Anthony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Grace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11967481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Tot Mom" resurfaces in a new video, and the cable-news universe remains as gleefully obsessed as ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been six months since a Florida jury found <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/casey_anthony_trial_verdict/">Casey Anthony not guilty </a>in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee. Since then, the woman who spent three years awaiting trial behind bars -- and in the glare of the news spotlight – has kept a low profile. Considering the lingering questions about her innocence, the intense public resentment over the verdict, and a steady stream of<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/casey-anthony-verdict-anthony-family-death-threats-wake/story?id=14004306#.TwcKEGNWqWU"> death threats</a>, her hibernation is hardly a surprise. But perhaps some part of Casey Anthony has missed the attention.</p><p>In a new video -- ostensibly recorded in October but which did not emerge until Thursday -- a now blond, bobbed and bespectacled Anthony narrates a four-minute "diary" entry about her new life. She says she's "extremely excited" about her future and new computer – being able to Skype, take pictures, and "finally have something that I can finally call mine." What she doesn't mention? The child she used to call her own.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/our_creepy_endless_fascination_with_casey_anthony/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/our_creepy_endless_fascination_with_casey_anthony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Piers Morgan plays dumb in UK media inquiry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/piers_morgan_plays_dumb_in_uk_media_inquiry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/piers_morgan_plays_dumb_in_uk_media_inquiry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone-hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piers Morgan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10701171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CNN host and former tabloid editor still doesn't admit to phone-hacking, though there's a lot he doesn't recall]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor British media personality host Piers Morgan was called to give evidence to the Leveson Inquiry, the British government's ongoing inquiry into the occasionally criminal newsgathering practices of the British tabloid press. Morgan appeared via satellite from the United States, where he is inexplicably employed as a talk show host by CNN.</p><p>Morgan edited the Daily Mirror, a competitor to Rupert Murdoch's News of the World and the Sun, from 1995-2004, when he was sacked for printing fake photographs and a hoax story on the front page of the paper. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/dec/20/piers-morgan-leveson-inquiry">No one alleges that phone-hacking was as widespread at Morgan's Mirror as it was at the News Corp. papers,</a> but Morgan has written of listening to a voice-mail message left by Paul McCartney on his ex-wife Heather Mills' phone, and said, in past statements, that basically "everyone" in the British press listened to celebrity voice mails.</p><p>The Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/dec/20/leveson-inquiry-piers-morgan-live">helpfully liveblogged Morgan's entire appearance.</a> Asked why the Mirror employed private detectives, Morgan played dumb:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/piers_morgan_plays_dumb_in_uk_media_inquiry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/piers_morgan_plays_dumb_in_uk_media_inquiry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4. Erin Burnett</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/4_erin_burnett/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/4_erin_burnett/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erin Burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Hack List 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10350311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street and CNBC veteran's shtick doesn't work well on news channels for us little people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erin Burnett was a perfect fit at CNBC, a business news network that interprets its mission as reporting <em>for</em> business leaders and the finance industry and not <em>on</em> them. A former Goldman Sachs analyst who also did a stint at Citigroup (business journalism might be worse than political reporting when it comes to team-switching and fraternizing among "sources" and "journalists"), Burnett epitomizes the CNBC worldview, where the ideal business journalist is a levelheaded interpreter of the omniscient market and ally of the wise men who've been enriched by it. Making the switch to being a news program host for us regular folk, on CNN, has not been without a couple of hitches for Ms. Burnett. Turns out, regular people don't naturally perceive CEOs and bankers as heroic figures, especially in the midst of a mass employment and consumer debt crisis that the wealthy have escaped unscathed.</p><p>Burnett, despite her youth, is a relic of a bygone age. She embodies '90s "market populism," to use Thomas Frank's phrase, now still surviving on our airwaves as a zombie idea. The idea of America as a mass "shareholder society" is a sick joke in a nation currently sharply divided between struggling debtors and bailed-out creditors, but the dream is popular enough among the well-off professionals in charge of our news networks that CNN pinned its prime-time hopes on Burnett appealing to a mass audience. (If ratings are any indication, it’s not working.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/4_erin_burnett/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/4_erin_burnett/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6. Erick Erickson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Hack List 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10431391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative blogger combines vitriol with stupidity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick Erickson is a generic right-wing blogger whose only notable quality as a commentator is his cowardly unwillingness to stand behind the various vitriolic things he says and writes. He's not a good writer or interesting thinker or particularly funny or savvy. His idea of a good gag is calling David Souter a "goat-fucking child molester" and then deleting that tweet and then hastily rewriting it when he got called on it and then <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/erick_erickson_howard_kurtz/">crying to Howard Kurtz that he regretted ever writing it.</a></p><p>Even the many vile and stupid things he says are repetitive and predictable. He's called Barack Obama <a href="http://gawker.com/5379998/erick-erickson-makes-the-dumbest-hitler-analogies?comment=15972707:15972707">a Nazi on multiple occasions</a>, for crimes like "criticizing the insurance industry" and "wanting to host the Olympics." Who can forget the time he <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/red-states-erik-erickson-writes-judge-s">idly wondered when citizens</a> would "march down to their state legislator's house, pull him outside, and beat him to a bloody pulp" over a Washington state proposal to regulate phosphates in dishwasher detergent? That's quality political analysis right there! No wonder CNN hired him!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8. Piers Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/8_piers_morgan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/8_piers_morgan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone-hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piers Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Hack List 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10349981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This unpleasant hack's history should've left him unhirable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let’s be honest: Larry King wasn’t much of a journalist. He was a lovable character, but he managed to get the big interviews because he lobbed softballs. But as I said, at least he was lovable. I’m not sure anyone besides a toxic celebrity’s public relations team could love Mr. Morgan, who alternates between fawning sycophancy and obvious contempt. Nothing about the man seems remotely sincere besides his self-regard.</p><p>And it’s odd that he even still has a career in what we’ll charitably refer to as journalism. As a talent show judge, a history of awful editorial decisions doesn’t much matter. But I’d argue that a news interview show host ought not to have been fired from the tabloid newspaper he ran for being credulous and sloppy enough to put a massive hoax on the front page, as Morgan <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3716151.stm">famously did at the Daily Mirror.</a></p><p>Then there’s the fact that one former Mirror reporter has <a href="”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94wD5adZKCo”">said phone-hacking was an “accepted technique”</a> at Morgan’s paper, and Morgan has written of listening to a celebrity’s voice-mail message that was most likely obtained through the practice that’s landed other British tabloids in serious legal trouble. Morgan has issued a series of increasingly carefully worded denials.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/8_piers_morgan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/8_piers_morgan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15. Wolf Blitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/15_wolf_blitzer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/15_wolf_blitzer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeopardy!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Hack List 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf Blitzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10320351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN's lead anchor is watching closely and thinking rarely]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolf Blitzer might be the single dumbest person on television. You can tell, listening to his verbal diarrhea-style of breaking news narration, that he's paid to fill airtime with talk, not communicate ideas. The confirmation for me was <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd2ySV7AfgM">his epically awful appearance on "Celebrity Jeopardy,"</a> in which he didn't just lose, he lost spectacularly. And "Celebrity Jeopardy" is not hard. And he <em>kept buzzing in</em>, even when he clearly had no clue. <em>And</em> the "Tonight Show" aired clips of Wolf <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/18/andy-richter-crushes-cnns_n_290883.html">being just as awful in rehearsal.</a></p><p>Not that a newsreader needs to be brilliant, or even to have a decent grasp of general information. But Blitzer's dimness is all-too-evident on "The Situation Room," CNN's seemingly 16-hour-long daytime showcase for its biggest video screen, which is gamely stood in front of by a gibbering goateed moron.</p><p>Jack Shafer demonstrated how once Wolf gets a cliché stuck in his head, he can't stop repeating it, like <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/press_box/2008/11/wolf_blitzer_is_watching_very_closely.single.html">a baby learning English.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/15_wolf_blitzer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/15_wolf_blitzer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Objective press unable to label dishonest Romney ad dishonest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/objective_press_unable_to_label_dishonest_romney_ad_dishonest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/objective_press_unable_to_label_dishonest_romney_ad_dishonest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10248742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phony objectivity muddles another easy call]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney released an ad that <a href="http://adage.com/article/campaign-trail/mitt-romney-ad-twists-obama-s-words-works/231147/">blatantly quotes Barack Obama out of context</a> in a way that severely distorts the meaning of Obama's words. The ad is, objectively, dishonest. That's not a matter of personal opinion, it is simply a fact. <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/22/democrats-say-new-romney-ad-distorts-obamas-words/">Here's how CNN reported this fact:</a><br />
<a href="http://media.salon.com/2011/11/romneycnnad.png"><img class="size-lg_horizontal wp-image-10248902 " title="romneycnnad" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/11/romneycnnad.png" alt="" width="460" /></a></p><p>The news, apparently, is that Democrats have asserted that the ad contains a distortion. Are they correct? Who knows! The CNN story prints the quote from the ad, prints the full quote, prints statements from Democrats saying the ad is dishonest, and prints statements from Romney's campaign saying the ad is not dishonest. Then, having armed the reader with all the necessary and somewhat contradictory information, the story moves on to other issues, like how much time Romney's spent in New Hampshire.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/objective_press_unable_to_label_dishonest_romney_ad_dishonest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/objective_press_unable_to_label_dishonest_romney_ad_dishonest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which network asks the best presidential debate questions?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/gopquestions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/gopquestions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/22/gopquestions</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox and MSNBC play "gotcha," while CNN talks policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt Gingrich may be a joke of a candidate, but he made a serious point the last time Fox News sponsored a presidential debate: Moderator Chris Wallace should "put aside the gotcha questions." With Fox News (and Google) sponsoring Thursday's night's debate, there is a risk of another gotcharama. A semi-scientific review shows that Fox and MSNBC are more likely to play gotcha. If you want to hear what the candidates have to say about public policy, wait for a debate sponsored by CNN.</p><p>Sparked by Newt's complaints -- and my own sense that the debate questions were poorly done -- I went back and coded the questions in each debate. I divided them into five categories:</p><p>&#8226;	Basic policy questions, which simply ask the candidates their positions on issues of public policy. For example, Tea Party voter Sandra Jones asked: "What would you do to get the economy moving forward? Do you have a plan? And, if so, what is it?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/gopquestions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/gopquestions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell just walked off CNN because she was running late</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus, the book-promoting election loser calls the president "a strapping young man"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems pretty obvious that Christine O'Donnell "walking off" that CNN show hosted by the oleaginous talent show judge and former phone-hacker <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2011/0818/Did-Christine-O-Donnell-plan-to-walk-off-Piers-Morgan-VIDEO">was a put-on, right?</a> Not like it was "scripted," per se, but it certainly wasn't a spontaneous decision inspired by a particularly outrageous line of questioning. Anyone can come up with something anodyne and vague to say about gay marriage -- the president does it all the time! -- if one doesn't feel like offering a decisive opinion. So Christine O'Donnell obviously left for other reasons. Publicity for her book? In part, probably. But was she also just ... late for another appointment?</p><p>That's what she told the crowd assembled at Women's National Republican Club in New York, where she was apparently booked to speak at the same time that she was booked to be interviewed on cable news by that guy from "The Apprentice." <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/christine-odonnell-on-her-piers-morgan-walk-out-hes-looking-for-ratings/">The New York Observer was there:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann campaign roughing up reporters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The congresswoman's staff is unapologetic about pushing, threatening journalists trying to cover her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann's goons spend a lot of time threatening and physically harassing reporters, and the campaign is not particularly apologetic about it, <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=DA99D4E2-56FE-430B-9612-CC7D24E02D58">Politico reports today</a>. Bachmann has some aggro old guy -- they claim he's a former Secret Service agent but considering that this is the Bachmann campaign he is just as likely to be a former ice cream truck driver or used sporting goods salesman or just some guy they found on Craigslist claiming to be a Secret Service agent -- who treats the candidate like she's the president in a war zone instead of a marginal celebrity congressperson wandering around Iowa, America's most harmless state. There are also two identical blond "advance" women who pushed poor Don Lemon into a golf cart.</p><p>Mr. Special Agent Grabby also threatened to break a reporter's arm. The reporter is both Norwegian and conservative, making him the least likely threat to Michele Bachmann alive.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Bennett: America has lost its way because Amy Winehouse got a Grammy three years ago</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Winehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former drug czar and high-stakes gambler says non-socially responsible art should not be recognized or rewarded]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Bennett, conservative pundit and former Reagan Cabinet member, <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/07/27/bennett.winehouse.drugs/index.html">has written a very serious and important column for CNN,</a> about how the people who give away Grammy Awards should be ashamed of themselves for giving a Grammy to Amy Winehouse, three years before she died. Because her famous song about addiction was not socially responsible, and because she later died, the nominating committee should never have rewarded her considerable musical talent and songwriting ability. <em>The Grammys have blood on their hands!</em></p><blockquote>
<p>A good place to start learning the lesson is the Grammy Awards nominating committee. Did they have any problem or pause whatsoever in emptying their cabinet of awards for such a song or such a character?</p>
<p>Did one judge say: "Wait, I think we might be sending the wrong message here"? Or, rather, did they do everything they could to get her to the Grammy Awards even after she was barred from entering the United States? The answer is the latter -- and she appeared for her awards by video feed from Great Britain.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogger says Piers Morgan phone-hacked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/piers_hacking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/piers_hacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/26/piers_hacking</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CNN host and former British tabloid editor might be in a bit of trouble]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unctuous CNN personality Piers Morgan was the editor of British tabloid the Daily Mirror until he was forced to resign after printing hoax images of British soldiers abusing detainees. He went on to become a talent show judge or something, until CNN decided this disgraced former editor of a disreputable tabloid newspaper would make a very good news interview show host. (I have nothing against disreputable tabloids, I just don't ever understand a single decision CNN makes.)</p><p>Morgan got his start in newspapers with Rupert Murdoch. He worked for the Sun and edited News of the World in the early 1990s before moving on to edit the Labour Party-supporting Mirror.</p><p>Various people have alleged that phone-hacking was widespread among all the tabloids, and not just at News Corp.'s papers. There has so far been no direct proof of this, though it looks like that will soon change, as <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14290370">the BBC reports that it</a> has "found evidence of possible hacking at the Sunday Mirror, and there are separate claims Daily Mirror journalists hacked voicemails."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/piers_hacking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/piers_hacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Piers Morgan: &#8220;I&#8217;ve never hacked a phone&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/20/piers_morgan_denies_hacking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/20/piers_morgan_denies_hacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/20/piers_morgan_denies_hacking</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CNN host protests MP Louise Mensch's claims about his editorship of British tabloid The Mirror]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On CNN&#160;last night, Piers Morgan (former editor of U.K. tabloids The News of the World and The Mirror) addressed MP&#160;Louise Mensch's claims -- made in the course of yesterday's parliamentary hearings -- that the CNN anchor himself had hacked phones "routinely" as editor of The Mirror.</p><p>Morgan flatly denied the allegations, which Mensch said were based on statements from Morgan's own diaries, published in 2005 as <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/insider-piers-morgan/1007624690?ean=9780091908492&amp;itm=1&amp;usri=the%2binsider%2bpiers%2bmorgan">"The Insider."</a> Morgan insisted that Mensch had not actually read the diaries, in which at one point -- during his editorship of The Mirror -- he wrote:</p><blockquote>
<p>[S]omeone suggested today that people might be listening to my mobile phone messages. Apparently if you don't change the standard security code that every phone comes with, then anyone can call your number and, if you don't answer, tap in the standard four digit code to hear all your messages. I'll change mine just in case, but it makes me wonder how many public figures and celebrities are aware of this little trick.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/20/piers_morgan_denies_hacking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/20/piers_morgan_denies_hacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s parting message</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/07/eliot_spitzer_s_parting_message/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/07/eliot_spitzer_s_parting_message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/07/eliot_spitzer_s_parting_message</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former New York governor quotes Teddy Roosevelt in the final segment of his canceled CNN show]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media learned Wednesday afternoon that Eliot Spitzer's evening talk show, 'In the Arena' <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/cnn/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/07/06/eliot_spitzer_canceled">was being canceled</a>. Spitzer signed off for the last time Wednesday night, using the final minutes of his show to read the quotation from Theodore Roosevelt whence his CNN show took its name. He read:</p><blockquote>
<p>It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually <strong>in the arena</strong>, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/07/eliot_spitzer_s_parting_message/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/07/eliot_spitzer_s_parting_message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN cancels Eliot Spitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/eliot_spitzer_canceled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/eliot_spitzer_canceled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/06/eliot_spitzer_canceled</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former governor's low-rated show gets axed from the last of the "objective" cable news channels]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Eliot Spitzer <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/06/cnn-cancels-in-the-arena-with-eliot-spitzer/">has been canceled!</a> The former governor of New York had a show with conservative columnist Kathleen Parker, because CNN was constitutionally unable to give a male Democrat a show without pairing him with a female Republican. But Spitzer basically dominated Parker, because he's a shouty megalomaniac, and Parker eventually left the show, leaving CNN with something resembling an actual hour of liberal opinion programming, which is anathema to their "brand." So he's out.</p><p>8 p.m. now goes to Anderson Cooper. Also getting a show is Erin Burnett, a former CNBC personality and make-believe "adviser" to moron birther Donald Trump on his television show "The Apprentice." She is fine, I guess, despite being the longtime public face of the horrible cable channel that represents the destructive interests of the useless bloated financial sector. Better than Piers Morgan, who is <em>not</em> canceled, despite being awful.</p><p>CNN claims Spitzer will still be on the cable news network but Spitzer <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/erin-burnett-to-7pm-on-cnn-john-king-usa-up-to-6pm-anderson-cooper-moves-to-8pm_b74952">is apparently looking for work at other networks</a>, according to TV Newser.</p><p>Also still not fired from CNN: Wolf Blitzer, the dumbest man on television.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/eliot_spitzer_canceled/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/eliot_spitzer_canceled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Torn: 10 pieces of cultural ambivalence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackass 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate and William: The Royal Wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Torn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week we're on the fence about: James Blunt's Auschwitz joke, Kathleen Hanna hating on Gaga and more Muppets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this may seem like the week of <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/22/cee_lo_green_antigay_tweets">awkwardness and homophobia</a> (sadly, it's also Pride Week), we can't forget about all the great Holocaust and Hitler references used by celebs recently, or the surge in rehab stories <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/twitter/?story=/ent/tv/feature/2011/06/23/roger_ebert_death_threats_trolls">following Ryan Dunn's death</a>. Great job, everyone.</p><p><strong>1. Justin Bieber and Tiffani Thiessen have a creepy crush on each other:</strong> As evidenced by the shirts the two wore to <a href="http://www.accesshollywood.com/justin-bieber-and-tiffani-thiessens-dueling-t-shirt-love-fest_article_49816">Canada's MuchMusic Video Awards</a>, bearing each other's faces. Bieber was born one year after "Saved by the Bell" went off the air.</p><p><strong>2. James Blunt's blunder:</strong> Put a photo of himself on Facebook in front of a historical building near Auschwitz, then claimed it was his "<a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150657005775424&amp;set=a.10150257523845424.487440.16855985423&amp;type=1&amp;comments">hotel in Poland.</a>"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

