<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Colorado</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/colorado/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gun deaths rampant after Sandy Hook massacre</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown Massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numbers are simply staggering: An average of 18 people have been killed each day since December 14]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> There have been more than 400 guns deaths since the Newtown massacre on December 14, according to a <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2012/12/gun_death_tally_every_american_gun_death_since_newtown_sandy_hook_shooting.html">new interactive project</a> between <em>Slate.com</em> and the anonymous twitter user @gundeaths.</p><p>The two launched the project because, as <em>Slate</em> writes, there are few real-time chronicles of daily gun deaths in the United States, despite the daily mention of firearms and gun politics in the media since the shooting. In fact, the onslaught of reporting on guns has been so intense, The Huffington Post published an article this morning with the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/douglas-anthony-cooper/bored-of-the-newtown-mass_b_2399602.html">headline “So You’re Bored of the Newtown Massacre?”</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana smoothie, anyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the drug now legal in Washington and Colorado, blended cannabis could become the health food craze of 2013]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> One of the nation's leading cannabis doctors has an idea for a New Year's diet: a marijuana smoothie. Dr. William Courtney, who has spent years researching the potential health benefits of medical marijuana, argues that juicing whole hemp plants can provide a host of healing properties, ranging from pain relief to even helping prevent diseases like cancer.</p><p>Yet, many of the health benefits are lost, Courtney says, when a patient ingests marijuana in the most typical way: by smoking it. Burning the plant kills off enzymes, which can diminish some of the curative properties. Juicing the entire plant, on the other hand, retains the enzymes and may be more medically beneficial. Plus, smoking the plant kicks the THC--and its psychoactive properties--into high gear, producing marijuana's high, which many find to be a curative effect in its own right, but is not always what the patient desires or wants.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aurora victims&#8217; relatives reject movie theater reopening</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/aurora_victims_relatives_reject_move_theater_reopening/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/aurora_victims_relatives_reject_move_theater_reopening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight Rises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james holmes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The theater where James Holmes shot 12 dead invited family members to its first opening after the shooting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CENTENNIAL, Colo. (AP) -- Relatives of the majority of people killed in a Colorado movie theater rejected an invitation on Wednesday to attend its reopening later this month, calling it a "disgusting offer."</p><p>The parents, grandparents, cousins and widow of nine of the 12 people killed released a letter sent to the theater's owner, Cinemark, in which they criticized the Plano, Texas-based company for not reaching out to the families of victims to offer their condolences. They also said the company refused to meet with them one-on-one without lawyers present.</p><p>The families said they were asked to attend an "evening of remembrance" followed by a movie when the Aurora theater reopens on Jan. 17 in invitations sent two days after Christmas.</p><p>"Thanks for making what is a very difficult holiday season that much more difficult. Timing is everything and yours is awful," they wrote.</p><p>The company had no immediate comment.</p><p>Cinemark has been renovating the Aurora theater and plans to re-open it Jan. 17, a move the city's mayor said had widespread support in the community. Gov. John Hickenlooper is among those planning to attend.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/aurora_victims_relatives_reject_move_theater_reopening/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/aurora_victims_relatives_reject_move_theater_reopening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressive victories you may have missed in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/progressive_victories_you_may_have_missed_in_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/progressive_victories_you_may_have_missed_in_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the progressive movement's biggest wins came in campaigns that had no candidates whatsoever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> This being the season of giving, it's worth looking back at some special gifts from November's election that received little acknowledgement at the time.</p><p>These victories came in campaigns that had no candidates — no Democrats, Republicans or other party designations. Rather, they were ballot initiatives — policy ideas put to a vote of people themselves. This is an exercise in direct democracy that was first proposed by the historic Populist movement of the 1870s. It's presently available to citizens in 26 states and hundreds of cities — and in this past year, it produced some serious progressive wins.</p><p>Unfortunately, corporations and super-wealthy individuals have now glommed onto this democratic innovation with deep-pocket vengeance, using their silos of money and expertise in PR deceit to pass some awful proposals and kill some great ones. Still, though, progressives are making good use of the initiative alternative to build winning coalitions around many big issues that the power structure refuses to address. They achieved several important public policy victories in November, even in red and purple states, showing again that populist issues can open minds, shove aside right-wing orthodoxy and overcome corporate money.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/progressive_victories_you_may_have_missed_in_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/progressive_victories_you_may_have_missed_in_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012: The year we all got high</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2012 was a "watershed" year for marijuana reform -- and not just in Washington and Colorado]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If liberalizing marijuana laws becomes the next big social issue, we will have 2012 to thank for it, as this was the year that the issue finally moved from the fringes to the center of American politics.</p><p>“In the now nearly fifty-year-old effort to end cannabis prohibition laws led by non-profit citizen advocacy groups, 2012 must be viewed as a watershed year for cannabis law reformers,” said Allen St. Pierre, the executive director of NORML, a leading marijuana reform group.</p><p>Tom Angell, the chairman of Marijuana Majority, agreed. "This was the year that we broke through and succeeded in getting prominent political observers and the media to pay attention to the fact that this is quickly becoming a mainstream issue.”</p><p>The biggest victories for advocates, of course, came in Washington and Colorado, where voters approved ballot measures to legalize cannabis for private recreational use. Washington’s law has already gone into effect, while Colorado’s will soon. Advocates hope that if all goes according to plan, other states will see there’s nothing to be afraid of and follow the example.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s weed announcement: Don&#8217;t celebrate just yet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/obamas_weed_announcement_dont_celebrate_just_yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/obamas_weed_announcement_dont_celebrate_just_yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds like good news for Washington and Colorado on marijuana, but history suggests reformers should be wary ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advocates in Washington and Colorado have been waiting anxiously to see what the federal government will do about their newly-enacted marijuana legalization laws, and now we’ve finally gotten some word on it from President Obama himself. Marijuana remains illegal under federal law, so the administration could theoretically crush the states’ nascent reforms by asserting its supremacy, but in <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/president-obama-marijuana-users-high-priority-drug-war/story?id=17946783#.UMsoknPjn7B">an interview</a> with ABC’s Barbara Walters, Obama suggested that’s not what’s going to happen. "It would not make sense for us to see a top priority as going after recreational users in states that have determined that it's legal,” he said.  "We've got bigger fish to fry.</p><p>This certainly seems like good news for reform advocates as it apparently rules out the harshest possible response -- a lawsuit in federal court to trump the states' laws -- and suggests the feds will mostly leave the states be. And when asked if he personally supports legalizing the drug, Obama said he does not "at this point,” opening the door for a marriage equality-like “evolution” down the road. "This is a tough problem, because Congress has not yet changed the law. I head up the executive branch; we're supposed to be carrying out laws,” he added.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/obamas_weed_announcement_dont_celebrate_just_yet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/obamas_weed_announcement_dont_celebrate_just_yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dem senator demands answers on White House pot policy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/dem_senator_demands_answers_on_white_house_pot_policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/dem_senator_demands_answers_on_white_house_pot_policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick J. Leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Leahy wants to know how the federal government will handle the two states that legalized marijuana]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., demanded answers from the federal government about how it will handle drug enforcement in Washington and Colorado, now that both states have legalized marijuana.</p><p>In a <a href="http://www.leahy.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/12-6-12%20copy%20PJL%20to%20Kerlikowske%20re%20-%20fed%20drug%20control%20policy.pdf">letter</a> to Gil Kerlikowske, the administration's director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, Leahy wrote:</p><blockquote><p>The Senate Judiciary Committee has a significant interest in the effect of these developments on Federal drug control policy. How does the Office of National Drug Control Policy intend to prioritize Federal resources, and what recommendations are you making to the Department of Justice and other agencies in light of the choice by citizens of Colorado and Washington to legalize personal use of small amounts of marijuana? What assurance can and will the administration give to state officials involved in the licensing of marijuana retailers that they will not face Federal criminal penalties for carrying out duties assigned to them under state law?</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/dem_senator_demands_answers_on_white_house_pot_policy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/dem_senator_demands_answers_on_white_house_pot_policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 absurd ways the military wastes taxpayer dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/7_absurd_ways_the_military_wastes_taxpayer_dollars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/7_absurd_ways_the_military_wastes_taxpayer_dollars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you thought the Petraeus scandal was embarrassing, wait 'til you hear how much is spent on military golf courses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The David Petraeus scandal has shined a light on the luxurious, subsidized lifestyle of the U.S. military's top generals. But so far, what the media has uncovered only scratches the surface of the abuses. Here are seven absurd ways the military wastes our money -- and none of them have anything to do with national defense.</p><p align="LEFT"><strong>1. A whole battalion of generals?</strong> The titles “general” or “admiral” sound like they belong to pretty exclusive posts, fit only for the best of the best. This flashy title makes it pretty easy to say, "so what if a few of our military geniuses get the royal treatment -- particularly if they are the sole commanders of the most powerful military in human history." The reality, however, is that there are  nearly<em> 1,000</em> generals and admirals in the U.S. armed forces, and each has an entourage that would make a Hollywood star jealous.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/7_absurd_ways_the_military_wastes_taxpayer_dollars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/7_absurd_ways_the_military_wastes_taxpayer_dollars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fracking fights back</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/fracking_fights_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/fracking_fights_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hickenlooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the help of Colorado's Democratic governor, the oil and gas industry is trying to overturn fracking bans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/us/marijuana-initiatives-in-2-states-set-federal-officials-scrambling.html">legal news</a> about Colorado these days revolves around whether or not the federal government will try to use the courts to prevent the state from implementing its new marijuana law. That's certainly an important story, but arguably just as important is the impending -- and possibly precedent setting -- legal battle here over the future of oil and gas drilling after the city of Longmont voted to ban hydraulic fracturing (aka "fracking") within its boundaries.</p><p>That vote wasn't some fluke. Following <a href="http://pipeline.post-gazette.com/news/archives/24949-pittsburgh-inspired-colo-town-s-fracking-ban">Pittsburgh's lead</a>, both Republican and Democratic residents in the city voted <a href="http://www.longmontweekly.com/longmont-local-news/ci_22053151/longmont-fracking-ban-vote-crossed-party-lines"><em>overwhelmingly</em></a> to ban the controversial natural gas extraction process after reports from (among others) the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/24/fracking-pollution-bradford-pa-blowout_n_883902.html">Environmental Protection Agency</a>, <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2011/0509/Fracking-for-natural-gas-is-polluting-ground-water-study-concludes">Duke University</a>, the <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_20210720/cu-denver-study-links-fracking-higher-concentration-air">University of Colorado</a> and the <a href="http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2011/04/19/gas-drilling-industry-makes-stunning-admission/">fossil fuel industry</a> itself documented fracking's potential hazards. Yet, despite all of this, Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper (D) just announced that his administration will <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/morning_call/2012/12/hickenlooper-colorado-wont-sue.html">officially back any lawsuit</a> brought by those same firms against Longmont's new law.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/fracking_fights_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/fracking_fights_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal government poisons America&#8217;s wells</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/federal_government_poisons_americas_wells/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/federal_government_poisons_americas_wells/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aquifers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Science Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Countless energy and mining companies have been granted permission to pollute aquifers across the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" align="left" /></a> Federal officials have given energy and mining companies permission to pollute aquifers in more than 1,500 places across the country, releasing toxic material into underground reservoirs that help supply more than half of the nation's drinking water.</p><p>In many cases, the Environmental Protection Agency has granted these so-called aquifer exemptions in Western states now stricken by drought and increasingly desperate for water.</p><div> EPA records show that portions of at least 100 drinking water aquifers have been written off because exemptions have allowed them to be used as dumping grounds.</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/federal_government_poisons_americas_wells/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/federal_government_poisons_americas_wells/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado governor signs marijuana legalization into law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/colorado_governor_signs_marijuana_legalization_into_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/colorado_governor_signs_marijuana_legalization_into_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hickenlooper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colorado became the second state, after Washington, to allow recreational pot use]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DENVER (AP) -- Marijuana for recreational use became legal in Colorado Monday, when the governor took the procedural step of declaring the voter-approved change part of the state constitution.</p><p>Colorado became the second state after Washington to allow pot use without a doctor's recommendation. Both states prohibit public use of the drug, and commercial sales in Colorado and Washington won't be permitted until after regulations are written next year.</p><p>Hickenlooper, a Democrat, opposed the measure but had no veto power over the voter-approved amendment to the state constitution. He tweeted his declaration Monday and sent an executive order to reporters by email after the fact. That prevented a countdown to legalization as seen in Washington, where the law's supporters gathered to smoke in public.</p><p>"Voters were loud and clear on Election Day," Hickenlooper said in his statement. The law allowed him until Jan. 5 to declare marijuana legal.</p><p>Adults over 21 in Colorado may now possess up to an ounce of marijuana, or six plants. Public use and sale of the drug remain illegal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/colorado_governor_signs_marijuana_legalization_into_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/colorado_governor_signs_marijuana_legalization_into_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal marijuana is good for kids</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/legal_marijuana_is_good_for_kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/legal_marijuana_is_good_for_kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayvon Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pot prohibition is supposed to protect America's youth. In fact, it does just the opposite]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> When <a href="http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2012/10/marijuana_inmate_with_allergy_dies_after_being_giv.php" target="_blank">Michael Saffioti's</a> mother suggested that he turn himself in to the Lynnwood Police Department for missing a court date related to a minor marijuana violation, surely she thought the 22-year-old would get a slap on the wrist. She could not have imagined that her son would not return from the police station. Saffioti struggled with a potentially fatal dairy allergy, experiencing great anxiety associated with the constant threat of a reaction. To calm his anxieties, he was using medical marijuana. Although he lived in Washington, which allows the use of marijuana for medical purposes, Saffioti did not have a recommendation from his doctor. After a few brushes with the law over his marijuana use, Saffioti missed a court date, and went to the police station with his mother, medical records in hand to resolve the issue. But, after one night at Snohomish County Jail, Saffioti died after being served a lethal meal of oatmeal containing dairy. Even more disturbing, Saffioti had told the guards he was having a reaction and they did not believe him, leaving him to die a slow death in his cell.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/legal_marijuana_is_good_for_kids/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/legal_marijuana_is_good_for_kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Obama harsh Washington and Colorado&#8217;s high?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/will_obama_harsh_washington_and_colorados_high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/will_obama_harsh_washington_and_colorados_high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that voters have made it clear they support legal recreational marijuana use, the feds need to make a choice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Since it became clear last month that recreational marijuana initiatives would pass in Colorado and Washington, the big question has been: Will the feds come after these states?</p><p>Under federal law, recreational marijuana use is still illegal. But now that the American people (in two states, at least) have made it clear they support legal recreational marijuana use, the Feds have to make a choice about whether to lay down the law – the federal law, that is -- or respect voters' choices.</p><p>The New York Times had <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/us/marijuana-initiatives-in-2-states-set-federal-officials-scrambling.html?pagewanted=all">a story </a>yesterday about this issue. It noted that “the Obama administration has been holding high-level meetings since the election to debate the response of federal law enforcement agencies to the decriminalization efforts.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/will_obama_harsh_washington_and_colorados_high/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/will_obama_harsh_washington_and_colorados_high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana legalization kicks in for Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/marijuana_legalization_kicks_in_for_washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/marijuana_legalization_kicks_in_for_washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crowds gathered at midnight in Seattle for celebratory joints, but the law is still under review]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marijuana legalization went into effect Thursday in Washington state and, according to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/06/legalizing-marijuana-washington-state_n_2249238.html">reports</a>, hundreds gathered under Seattle's Space Needle to spark up in unison as the clock struck midnight.</p><p>Last month, voters in Washington and Colorado <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/war_on_drugs_beginning_of_the_end/">chose to legalize </a>the possession of small amounts of marijuana to adults aged over 21. In both states licenses will be granted to pot growers and sellers to legally distribute the product, which, like alcohol and tobacco, will be taxed. Colorado's legalization measure is set to go into effect early next month. Smoking pot in public remains illegal in both states but, as the AP noted, there was "nary a police officer in sight" during the celebration early Thursday morning -- the Seattle Police Department told its 1,300 officers that until further notice they were not to issue citations for public marijuana use.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/marijuana_legalization_kicks_in_for_washington/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/marijuana_legalization_kicks_in_for_washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 possible futures for legalized pot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/8_possible_futures_for_legalized_pot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/8_possible_futures_for_legalized_pot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13115797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drug policy reformers are still grappling over different strategies, but here's how things could play out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Pot-smokers of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but your pipe dreams.</p><p>Marijuana legalization is a beginning, not an end.</p><p>When residents of Colorado and Washington voted to legalize the adult use of cannabis, it felt like a momentary rush of sobriety in a country dazed by decades of anti-marijuana hysteria. But what comes next?</p><p>The drug war edifice is cracking and the end of prohibition may be nigh. Or may not be. The way things play out is not preordained. Major strategic differences among legalization proponents are surfacing about how to proceed. Some drug policy reform leaders, fearing an official backlash, are urging a cautious, go-slow, approach: make it as easy as possible for the feds to back off and let the states do their thing. Other voices, claiming a pro-pot electoral mandate, are calling for bold, assertive moves to implement the will of the voters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/8_possible_futures_for_legalized_pot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/8_possible_futures_for_legalized_pot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama should leave states alone on pot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/why_obama_should_leave_states_alone_on_pot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/why_obama_should_leave_states_alone_on_pot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama controls the fate of Colorado and Washington's marijuana laws. The popular approach is also smart policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been exactly three weeks since Election Day, but the Obama administration still hasn’t said how it will respond to ballot measures legalizing pot in Colorado and Washington.</p><p>Since the drug remains illegal under federal law, the administration could squash the states’ nascent legalization movement by asking for courts to stop the implementation of the new laws, or by sending more federal agents to the states. But even though they knew the measures would be on the ballot for more than a year, “the Obama administration has stayed mum On The Other Big Thing That Happened on Nov. 6,” as Reason’s Mike Riggs <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2012/11/26/its-november-26-and-the-obama-administra?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reason%2FHitandRun+%28Reason+Online+-+Hit+%26+Run+Blog%29">wrote</a> yesterday.</p><p>Meanwhile, stakes have been raised: Prosecutors in <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_22012312/editorial-colorado-das-right-drop-charges-pot">both</a> <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2012/11/13/washington-prosecutors-drop-marijuana-ca">states</a> have dropped pot charges against hundreds of offenders, and legislators in Maine and Rhode Island are considering their own legalization bills.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/why_obama_should_leave_states_alone_on_pot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/why_obama_should_leave_states_alone_on_pot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could pot stop breast cancer?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/could_pot_stop_breast_cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/could_pot_stop_breast_cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13107825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medical marijuana is legal in 18 states, but it's clear we've only discovered a fraction of its medicinal potential]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> There are now legal medical cannabis programs in 18 states plus Washington, DC, with pot fully legal for adults in two other states. Ironically, however, the actual healing power of the plant has barely been tapped. Smoking marijuana with THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), or better, vaporizing it (using a device to bake the plant material and inhale the active ingredients), has an indisputably palliative effect and can be medically useful for pain relief, calming and appetite stimulation. It already has confirmed benefits against glaucoma, epilepsy and other specific diseases and disorders. It also gets people high. THC triggers cannabinoid receptors in the brain and this produces the sensation of being stoned. These receptors are found in the parts of the brain linked to pleasure, memory, concentration, and time perception.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/could_pot_stop_breast_cancer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/could_pot_stop_breast_cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 reasons the feds shouldn&#8217;t crack down on pot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_reasons_the_fed_shouldnt_crack_down_on_pot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_reasons_the_fed_shouldnt_crack_down_on_pot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize marijuana. It behooves Obama to let them have their way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> On Election Day, Washington State and Colorado became the first two states in the country -- and indeed the first political jurisdictions anywhere in the world -- to approve legally regulating marijuana like alcohol.</p><p>It would be a mistake to call these ballot initiative victories "pro-pot." Most of those who voted in favor don't use marijuana; indeed many don't like it at all and have never used it. What moved them was the realization that it made more sense to regulate, tax and control marijuana than to keep wasting money and resources trying to enforce an unenforceable prohibition.</p><p>Whether or not the two state governments move forward with regulating marijuana like alcohol will depend on two things: how the Obama administration, federal prosecutors and police agencies respond; and the extent to which the states' senior elected officials commit to implementing the will of the people. The fact that federal laws explicitly criminalize marijuana transactions, and that the federal government can continue to enforce those laws, means that federal authorities could effectively block the initiatives from being fully implemented. But there are also good reasons why the Obama administration should, and may, allow state governments to proceed as voters have demanded.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_reasons_the_fed_shouldnt_crack_down_on_pot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_reasons_the_fed_shouldnt_crack_down_on_pot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End the drug war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/end_the_drug_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/end_the_drug_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jokes aside, it's on President Obama to take the next serious step toward legalizing pot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's next? Amid all the munchie-themed jokes from reporters, political elites and late-night comedians, this remains the overarching question after Coloradans voted overwhelmingly to legalize, regulate and tax marijuana in the same way alcohol is already legalized, regulated and taxed. Since those anti-drug war principles are now enshrined in Colorado's constitution, only the feds can stop this Rocky Mountain state – if they so choose. But will they? And should they even be able to?</p><p>The answer to the former is maybe. Barack Obama campaigned for president pledging to respect state marijuana laws, and his Justice Department in 2009 issued a memo reiterating that promise. But by 2011, the same Justice Department countermanded that directive and authorized a federal crackdown. Now, with the results of the 2012 election, Colorado's Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper has been forced into the awkward position of fighting off the feds in defense of a state constitutional amendment he tried to defeat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/end_the_drug_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/end_the_drug_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End the war on weed!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot Legalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defying federal law, two states just legalized marijuana. A popular campaign forces Obama to take a stance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decades-long fight to end the Drug War - and specifically, the absurd war on marijuana - received a huge boost in the 2012 election, as Colorado and Washington became the first states to vote to legalize and regulate cannabis. Following those historic votes, a <a href="http://www.argojournal.com/2012/11/poll-watch-rasmussen-r-survey-on.html">new poll</a> shows the vast majority of Americans want states - not the federal government - to decide for themselves whether to legalize pot. Meanwhile, California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) took to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/11/jerry-brown-marijuana-laws_n_2113760.html">national television</a> to amplify the message of that poll, demanding that the federal government to respect states whose voters have spoken.</p><p>The problem, of course, is that the Obama administration may cite the 1970 Controlled Substances Act as statutory rationale to try to force states to continue an expensive and inhumane war on weed that unnecessarily arrests and incarcerates thousands of Americans each year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/democrats_push_obama_to_lay_off_pot_states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>