<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Consumerism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/consumerism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with Disney princesses?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney princesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A small victory for Merida doesn't change the company's dysfunctional branding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's one thing you can count on Disney for, it's creating strong leading female characters in its movies – and then reducing them to wide-eyed idiots in their merchandising. The Belle who obsessed on books and the Tiana who scrimped and saved for her own restaurant, the warrior Mulan and the wise Pocahontas – they've all been reduced to flowing hair and off-the-shoulder dresses and coy looks in their post-cinematic incarnations. But when the mouse tried to give its "Brave" heroine Merida a "Stepford Wives" makeover, it finally went too far.</p><p>Last week, Disney announced that it was adding the headstrong, flame-haired heroine to its "Princess" collection. But it was the revamped image of Merida -- her waist nipped, her eyes elongated, her messy tangle of hair a sexy tumble, her plain dress a shimmer of bling and her trademark bow and arrow nowhere to be seen – that set parents' jaws dropping. Disney blandly told Yahoo Shine that <a href="http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/disney-princess-makeover-sparks-outrage--merida-petition-goes-viral-175251230.html ">"Merida exemplifies what it means to be a Disney Princess</a> through being brave, passionate, and confident and she remains the same strong and determined Merida from the movie whose inner qualities have inspired moms and daughters around the world." But it didn't quell the disgust.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dolls for girls, science and Legos for boys: The toy aisle is still sexist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Orenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A drugstore chain declares science is for boys -- until customers fight back on Twitter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can't do away with sexism by doing away with sexist labeling. But it's a start. So thanks, Boots. After an embarrassing kerfuffle over what it backwardly deems gender appropriate toys, the U.K. drugstore chain is moving toward a more equitable display system.</p><p>Boots' enlightenment began after Twitter user Sean E. Gray posted a photo from the store, with the caption "not impressed." It revealed the store's "Girl Toy" section, featuring princess gear and mini-tea sets, and the "Boy" section -- chock-full of Science Museum brand kits.</p><p>As the Guardian reports, Boots initially defended the placement, saying its real estate choices were based on <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317559/Boots-removes-store-signs-labellign-girls-boys-toys-customers-complain-sexism.html#ixzz2S2DdqHAN">"customer feedback" and making the stores "easier to navigate."</a> But in the face of mounting criticism, it has since retreated, promising on its Facebook page that "It was never our intention to stereotype certain toys. It's clear we have got this signage wrong, and we're taking immediate steps to remove it from store."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How shoppers can help prevent Bangladesh-type disasters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh Garment Factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adidas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In wake of the garment factory tragedy, here's what ethical clothing consumers can do via the global supply chain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While rescue workers continue to dig through the rubble of Rana Plaza, the collapsed Bangladeshi garment factory responsible for the deaths of 433 people (and counting), Americans are faced yet again with the stark reality of consumer culpability in these disasters.</p><p>Major clothing retailers like Wal-Mart, Joe Fresh, JCPenney and the Children's Place were each found to have <a href="http://business.time.com/2013/05/02/bangladesh-factory-collapse-is-there-blood-on-your-shirt/">subcontracted manufacturing</a> to the crumbling factory in Savar, where workers were making an average of $38 a month and coerced to report to work even after the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/bangladesh_building_collapse_toll_climbs_to_433_ap/singleton/">walls of the building were literally falling apart</a>. In November, fire ravaged another garment factory near the capital city of Dhaka, leaving 112 dead. Again, pieces of clothing from Sears, the Walt Disney Co. and other major retailers were found among the scorched remains.</p><p>In the aftermath of such tragic, and preventable, losses of life, many consumers are left asking themselves what role they can play in discouraging disasters like this from happening again. And, fortunately, there are answers. The collective power of workers is a real thing, and the collective power of consumers is, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sustainable pork farming is real</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/meet_russ_kremer_americas_most_famous_sustainable_pork_farmer_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/meet_russ_kremer_americas_most_famous_sustainable_pork_farmer_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chipotle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnEarth.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russ Kremer's small pig farm served as the inspiration for a Chipotle ad, which praises his antibiotic-free pork]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.onearth.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/OElogo-e1365090399191.png" alt="OnEarth" /></a> Priest or pig farmer? Those were the only two callings that Russ Kremer ever considered. And really, it wasn’t even close.</p><p>Raised in the hamlet of Frankenstein in central Missouri, a few miles from where he still lives, Kremer wasn’t even old enough to attend grade school when his father gave him the job of bottle-feeding orphaned piglets in the house. By age six, he had graduated to tending sows and their litters. At eight, Kremer’s father handed him a recently weaned female and said, "She’s yours." Kremer named her Honeysuckle and raised her like a pet, often lying beside her in her stall. She gave birth to 15 young -- a challenge because she only had 13 nipples. Normally, at least three piglets would have died, but Kremer switched the babies on and off their mother during the critical early weeks. All 15 survived.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/meet_russ_kremer_americas_most_famous_sustainable_pork_farmer_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/meet_russ_kremer_americas_most_famous_sustainable_pork_farmer_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are stores charging customers to browse?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/why_are_stores_charging_customers_to_browse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/why_are_stores_charging_customers_to_browse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vera Wang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gluten-free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two very different retailers take heat for -- really -- asking customers to pay to shop]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you needed another reason to just stay home and order everything off the Internet – how about two news reports in one day of retailers charging customers merely to come in and browse?</p><p>Over the weekend, sharp-eyed posters on <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/1axk4y/when_they_open_tomorrow_im_going_to_see_how_many/c91vgon?context=3">Reddit pointed out a sign</a> in the window of the Australian gluten-free grocer Celiac Supplies warning that "As of the first of February, this store will be charging people a $5 fee per person for 'just looking.' The $5 fee will be deducted when goods are purchased." No mention, by the way, of a refund if a customer leaves empty-handed.</p><p>Meanwhile, over in China, overrated bridal gown designer Vera Wang has celebrated the opening of her new wedding boutique by announcing that "every potential customer at the Shanghai store will be charged 3,000 yuan ($482) <a href="http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/759830.shtml">simply to try on the gowns for sale."</a> Shoppers have also been scolded that they should give the store "several weeks" to get an appointment, when they will then be allotted just 90 minutes to try on clothes. Seriously, shoppers, <a href="http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_trksid=p2050601.m570.l1313&amp;_nkw=vera+wang+wedding+dress&amp;_sacat=0&amp;_from=R40.">it's called eBay</a>, and you can ogle all day long for free there.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/why_are_stores_charging_customers_to_browse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/why_are_stores_charging_customers_to_browse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A salon on Mayor Bloomberg&#8217;s big drink ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/a_salon_on_mayor_bloombergs_big_drink_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/a_salon_on_mayor_bloombergs_big_drink_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soda ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two experts are live-debating one of the most controversial public-health proposals in years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week a judge<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/nyregion/judge-invalidates-bloombergs-soda-ban.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0"> nixed</a> New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s proposed ban on sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces. Bloomberg is arguably the most influential advocate for public health in the country. His 2003 ban on smoking in bars has been widely copied. More recently, his staunch advocacy for gun control and his bottomless pockets suggest he could take on the NRA. His soda ban, however, has even some supporters scratching their heads. Will it help to fight obesity? Why 16 ounces? Is it just too intrusive?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/a_salon_on_mayor_bloombergs_big_drink_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/a_salon_on_mayor_bloombergs_big_drink_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The problem with food banks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/the_problem_with_food_banks_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/the_problem_with_food_banks_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Walrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13230029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They may compound the very problems they should be solving]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thewalrus.ca/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/WalrusNameplate-e1362787342439.jpg" alt="The Walrus" /></a> <span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Picture a vast warehouse the size of a football field. Forklifts stand loaded with wooden pallets and cardboard boxes tightly secured with heavy-duty plastic wrap. In aisle upon aisle, boxes sit on metal shelves that reach all the way to the ceiling. It might be an IKEA store or any modern commodity warehouse. But this is a food bank or, more accurately, a food bank distribution warehouse. Every major Canadian city has one. The largest send out nearly 8 million kilograms of food a year to the hungry people lining up at community-based food banks.</p><p>The scale and sophistication of these operations are impressive. There are hundreds of employees and volunteers who handle thousands of donated food items, trucks and boxes, cans and bags. There is also a large fridge and freezer section for storing all manner of perishables.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/the_problem_with_food_banks_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/the_problem_with_food_banks_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex toy to unite partners across cyberspace</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/sex_toy_to_unite_partners_across_cyberspace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/sex_toy_to_unite_partners_across_cyberspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13222341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, gadgets that simulate lovers "actions" in real time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Later this month, sex toy company </span><a style="font-size: 13px;" href="http://www.lovepalz.com/info.html">Lovepalz</a><span style="font-size: 13px;"> is releasing a device that it boasts enables couples to have sex with each other over the Internet. The gadget comes in two parts, classily named Hera for her and Zeus for him. Both function like, well, sex toys until the Wi-Fi revs up and bestows a rather gratuitous effect. <a href="http://www.dailydot.com/news/internet-sex-toy-lovepalz/">The Daily Dot</a> describes it in blessedly technical language:  </span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/sex_toy_to_unite_partners_across_cyberspace/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/sex_toy_to_unite_partners_across_cyberspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is kitty litter in your cigarette</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/there_is_kitty_litter_in_your_cigarette/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/there_is_kitty_litter_in_your_cigarette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And it's helping tobacco companies avoid up to $1.1 billion in taxes ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A dozen tobacco companies have avoided as much as $1.1 billion in taxes by using fillers (like the clay found in cat litter) to make their cigarettes heavier, exempting them from a 2,653 percent increase in a federal excise tax on non-"large cigar" tobacco products.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-01/tobacco-firms-save-1-billion-with-kitty-litter-in-cigars.html" target="_blank">reported</a> by Bloomberg News, current rules "require a rolled tobacco product to weigh at least 3 pounds per 1,000 to be labeled as a 'large' or 'premium' cigar, a category where taxes increased just 155 percent."</p><p>The practice of weighting tobacco products has contributed to a 100 percent increase in sales of the filler-laced products, and a <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6130a1.htm" target="_blank">report</a> from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention blames the “tax disparities between product types” for increased adult consumption of pipe tobacco and cigarette-like cigars. While cigarette smoking has been on the decline for more than a decade, "large cigar" smoking, including the filler-laced cigarettes, tripled in the same time period.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/there_is_kitty_litter_in_your_cigarette/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/there_is_kitty_litter_in_your_cigarette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t make your pet your Valentine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/dont_make_your_pet_your_valentine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/dont_make_your_pet_your_valentine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentines Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Beasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One-fifth of Americans are spending millions on presents for their animals this year. C'mon, people!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valentine's Day is a pretty BS holiday, right up there with New Year's Eve on the list of high-pressure, aren't you having THE GREATEST EXPERIENCE OF YOUR LIFE? days seemingly designed to make 98 percent of us feel like losers. So if one-fifth of us have figured out a way to mark the holiday with a different kind of statement of love, that's probably a good thing, right? If we want to take this day to do something special for a loved one – the one who offers comfort when we're sad, the one we go for walks with in the park, maybe share a bed with, who's to judge? I'm just saying, folks, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2013/02/13/pets-valentines-day-gift-dog-cat/1917251/">$815 million</a> is a whole lot of money to spend on Valentines for your pets.</p><p>That's how much the National Retail Federation estimates we will shell out this year for our dogs, cats, "fish, horses and small animals." I'd say that it's all well and good, but don't expect them to reciprocate with so much as a card -- except that over the past few years, I've noticed a creeping new segment of the card shop rack devoted to none other than "From Cat" greetings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/dont_make_your_pet_your_valentine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/dont_make_your_pet_your_valentine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl liveblog</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/super_bowl_liveblog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/super_bowl_liveblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liveblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halftime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Crown Bud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Godaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ravens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13188403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And it's the Ravens! Congratulations, Charm City and MVP Joe Flacco!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[liveblog id=56]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/super_bowl_liveblog/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/super_bowl_liveblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2013 Super Bowl ad preview</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/2013_super_bowl_ad_preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/2013_super_bowl_ad_preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13187492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good, the stupid and the mildly offensive ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smell of chicken wings and seven-layer dip fills the air. The carbonated whisper of beer cans opening in unison tickles your ears. Somewhere, Jackie Harbaugh is wondering which of her sons she will love more at the end of the night. It is Super Bowl Sunday, and the game is about to begin.</p><p>Just kidding! It is only Thursday, and all that we have to satiate our football hunger is a humble grouping of Super Bowl ad previews.</p><p>So join me in watching them, and pretending -- if just for a moment -- that it's the big day and the working week is just a distant memory.</p><p><strong>The Good (relatively speaking)</strong></p><p>Hyundai uses Wes Anderson-esque stylized detachment to sell its 2013 Sonata Turbo. Who's buying?</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/SohqIBOb03k" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Pepsi made Super Bowl history with a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B02DGmkqDDU">sexy Cindy Crawford</a> in cut-offs. This ad will not make Super Bowl history, but it gets points for an extended take of a teenager dumping a full gallon of milk on his head and casting a mustachioed Will Forte <a href="http://static.tvfanatic.com/files/will-forte.jpg" target="_blank">lookalike</a> as a preternaturally chill, soda-loving dad.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/2013_super_bowl_ad_preview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/2013_super_bowl_ad_preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple posts disappointing fourth quarter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/apple_disappoints_with_fourth_quarter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/apple_disappoints_with_fourth_quarter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The electronics giant fell short of expectations on holiday season results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple posted fourth quarter results that disappointed investors, further denting the "reality distortion field" that surrounded the company under former CEO Steve Jobs.</p><p>It reported revenue of $54.5 billion, almost exactly what analysts had <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-q1-earnings-2013-1">predicted</a>. Sales of its famous iPhone and iPad products were slightly below expectations at 47.8 million and 22.9 million, respectively. It reported gross margin of 38.6 percent below the expected 39.5 percent.</p><p>The world’s most valuable company has seen its stock slide almost 30 percent since September. Apple, which changed the world with its iPhone and iPad products, appears increasingly vulnerable to competition, especially from the South Korean behemoth Samsung.</p><p>While Apple offers a relatively small number of products for a company of its type and size, and a famously controlled tech “ecosystem,” Samsung sells a more diverse, almost anarchic, product line. And its products typically run on Google’s more open Android operating system.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/apple_disappoints_with_fourth_quarter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/apple_disappoints_with_fourth_quarter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digitizing classic games doesn&#8217;t always work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/digitizing_classic_games_doesnt_always_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/digitizing_classic_games_doesnt_always_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13167704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some things were just meant to be analog]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Wednesday, toymaker Hasbro announced it would be <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2013/01/08/monopoly-board-game-tokens-change/1805387/">retiring one of the game pieces</a> in the classic board game Monopoly, asking fans to <a href="https://apps.facebook.com/saveyourtoken/">vote on Facebook</a> for which one of the game’s classic tokens -- the hat, the wheelbarrow, the scotty dog, the race car, the thimble, the battleship or the shoe -- they’d like to see replaced with a new game piece. The options for the new token, including a toy robot, a helicopter and a guitar, are intended to be "more representative of today's Monopoly players" than the old pieces, Hasbro vice president <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/09/living/monopoly-new-token/index.html">Eric Nyman</a> told CNN.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/digitizing_classic_games_doesnt_always_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/digitizing_classic_games_doesnt_always_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. gas sales declining</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/u_s_gas_sales_declining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/u_s_gas_sales_declining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not just fuel efficiency. Americans appear less interested in getting from point A to point B]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/Gasoline-Sales.php">note</a> by Doug Short at AdvisorPerspectives.com shows that per capita gas sales have declined steeply over the last few years. According to the latest available numbers from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the 12-month moving average for gas sales dropped to  about 350 million gallons per day, down 7.7 percent since August 2005.</p><p>"Some of the shrinkage in sales can be attributed to more fuel-efficient cars," Short writes. "But that presumably would be minor over shorter time frames and would be offset to some extent by population growth." He also notes that this list of <a href="http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/top-10/top-10-best-selling-vehicles.html" target="_blank">top 10 best-selling vehicles</a> has its share of gas guzzling pickups and SUVs.</p><p>And the sales drop has taken place at a time when the population has grown. Short finds that per-capita gas sales have declined almost 20 percent since March 1989.</p><p>What's going on here? Short sees several factors at work: 1) Urban populations have climbed, 2) Fewer people in the aging population have to get to work and 3) More young people are able to work from home or, due to social media, are less interested in leaving the house. We've become a nation less demographically inclined to drive.</p><p>h't <a href="http://qz.com/">Quartz</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/u_s_gas_sales_declining/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/u_s_gas_sales_declining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drake does not own YOLO</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/drake_does_not_own_yolo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/drake_does_not_own_yolo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yolo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still, the singer wants credit -- and cash -- for popularizing the most annoying phrase of the year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drake is not a man who backs down from a dispute. Just <a href="http://globalgrind.com/entertainment/chris-brown-drake-fight-beef-meek-mill-rihanna-wip-new-york-photos-pictures">ask Chris Brown</a>. So watch your backs, Walgreens and Macy's.</p><p>On Christmas, the Billboard-chart-dominating star took to Instagram to vent his spleen against retailers with an image of a groaning shelf -- unironically designated "beauty" -- full of caps emblazoned with the acronym YOLO. "Walgreens....you gotta either chill or <a href="http://statigr.am/p/353936478005166417_14455831">cut the cheque</a>," he wrote in Canadian, adding a <a href="http://statigr.am/p/353937030168510811_14455831">"Macy's...same goes for you"</a> warning under a photo of a YOLO-themed Charlie Brown and Snoopy shirt. Coming soon: Morgan Freeman getting huffy every time someone mentions a bucket list, and Robert Carlyle issuing an injunction against all forms of Full Montyism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/drake_does_not_own_yolo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/drake_does_not_own_yolo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No soda for food stamps?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/no_soda_for_food_stamps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/no_soda_for_food_stamps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Bittman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Influential food writer Mark Bittman thinks SNAP beneficiaries should be cut off from sugary drinks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the government dictate what the poor can drink?</p><p>New York Times columnist Mark Bittman <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/25/stop-subsidizing-obesity/?hp">argues</a> that the almost 50 million people who receive SNAP benefits (formerly known as food stamps) should not be allowed to spend the funds on soda and other junk food. The idea has “been gaining momentum in the last few years” Bittman writes, since “no one without a share in the profits can argue that [a sugary drink] plays a constructive role in any diet.”</p><p>Bittman’s column highlights a recent <a href="http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1487507">article</a> in the Journal of the American Medical Association:</p><blockquote><p>“It’s shocking,” says [Dr. David] Ludwig, [director of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center and one of the article’s authors] “how little we consider food quality in the management of chronic diseases. And in the case of SNAP that failure costs taxpayers twice: We pay once when low-income families buy junk foods and sugary beverages with SNAP benefits, and we pay a second time when poor diet quality inevitably increases the costs of health care in general, and Medicaid and Medicare in particular.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/no_soda_for_food_stamps/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/no_soda_for_food_stamps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Miracle on 34th Street&#8221;: Best Christmas movie ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/the_real_miracle_of_miracle_on_34th_street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/the_real_miracle_of_miracle_on_34th_street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miracle on 34th Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With its subversive anti-commercialist message, "Miracle on 34th Street" still resonates 65 years later]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/weeklings_new_small.png" alt="The Weeklings" align="left" /></a> LAST WEEK, my wife, Stephanie, and I decided to watch <em>Miracle on 34<sup>th</sup> Street</em> with our kids, who are six and almost eight. As Kris Kringle strolled through Midtown Manhattan as the opening credits rolled, we realized that, although the film has been on television every December since its release in 1947, and although we’d both seen big chunks of it, neither of us had ever watched the entire movie from start to finish (and certainly not without commercial interruption). We didn’t know what we were in for.</p><p>One of the challenges with watching old movies with your kids is that the mores have changed radically in the last half century. Many old cartoons are staggeringly racist. Almost everything made before, say, 1985 is egregiously sexist; there’s one awkward sequence in <em>Rudolph the Red-nose Reindeer</em>, for example, when Rudolph’s mother and Clarissa, his girlfriend, don’t chase after the red-nosed runaway because they are <em>women</em>, and they know it’s not their place. The men in old movies are forever on the verge of date rape (the old cartoons, too; I’m looking at you, Pepe LePew), always quick to resort to violence, to fix a stiff drink, to blow secondhand smoke in a child’s face, to slap a woman across the face to prepare her for lovemaking, to gay-bash. Is that how society was in the forties? I don’t know, but I’m not entirely comfortable exposing my kids to it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/the_real_miracle_of_miracle_on_34th_street/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/the_real_miracle_of_miracle_on_34th_street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal tech upends the toy market</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/personal_tech_upends_the_toy_market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/personal_tech_upends_the_toy_market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mattel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hasbro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investor: “Everyone I know who has a kid under 10 has a tablet in the house. And that tablet is the babysitter,”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Children have played with dolls for <a href="http://ctdollartists.com/history.htm">millenia</a>. It was a good run.</p><p>Mattel is the maker of Barbie and Hot Wheels, but this year its top selling toy is a plastic cell phone case, according to the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8f912afe-4a05-11e2-8002-00144feab49a.html#ixzz2Fu62w3Oa">Financial Times</a> (subscription required):</p><blockquote><p> Whether a new Kindle Fire, or a hand-me-down iPad, analysts predict 2012 will be the year children as young as three-years-old will unwrap tablets at trendsetting rates. And that has the traditional toy companies scrambling to stay relevant.</p> <div>“The top two guys, <a href="http://markets.ft.com/tearsheets/performance.asp?s=us:MAT" data-symbol="us:MAT">Mattel</a> and <a href="http://markets.ft.com/tearsheets/performance.asp?s=us:HAS" data-symbol="us:HAS">Hasbro</a>, they are terrified,” said Sean McGowan, managing director of equity research at Needham &amp; Company, an investment banking firm. “They should be terrified, but the official party line is they’re not terrified.”</div> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/personal_tech_upends_the_toy_market/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/personal_tech_upends_the_toy_market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santa&#8217;s evil Orwellian spy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/elf_on_the_shelf_santas_little_voyueur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/elf_on_the_shelf_santas_little_voyueur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elf on the Shelf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elf on a Shelf is a nightmarish voyeur. It's time to end this insidious "Christmas tradition"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the Elf on the Shelf. I hate his evil, dead-eyed sidelong smile. I hate that he invades innocent children's homes without compunction. I even hate his full name: "The Elf on the Shelf: A Christmas Tradition." I hate how it sounds like it's a threat, like, "I'm not just the Elf: I'm the Elf who will return every goddamn Christmas of your life, everybody. So GIVE ME A NAME AND DEAL WITH IT." I hate how he seems to become more powerful with each passing year.</p><p>Have I mentioned I hate the Elf on the Shelf?</p><p>Once upon a time, long ago in 2005, a lady named <a href="http://www.bookbusinessmag.com/article/how-self-published-book-became-best-seller-415174/1">Carol Aebersold self-published a book</a> about her innocuous holiday tradition. It was the story of an elf who would appear in your home after Thanksgiving to quietly observe how well the family was behaving, report back to Santa at the North Pole each night and reappear somewhere else in the household the next day. Whimsical!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/elf_on_the_shelf_santas_little_voyueur/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/elf_on_the_shelf_santas_little_voyueur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
