<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > CPAC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/cpac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is this baby-faced blogger the next Andrew Breitbart?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/the_next_andrew_breitbart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/the_next_andrew_breitbart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Shapiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breitbart.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love him or hate him, former child prodigy Ben Shapiro is a growing force on the right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">In young, conservative circles, there are many ambitious go-getters who want to be the next Andrew Breitbart. Say what you will about the late right-wing pioneer (and there are plenty of negative things to say), but as Joan Walsh <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/tucker_carlson_you%E2%80%99re_no_andrew_breitbart/">wrote recently</a>, the founder of the eponymous media empire was inimitable, both in his successes and tremendous failings, and there is no obvious successor.</p><p dir="ltr">The empire he left behind is riven with bitter internal disputes, as <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/breitbarts-inheritors-battle-over-his-legacy">BuzzFeed’s McKay Coppins detailed</a>, and there is a dearth of young up-and-comers. James O’Keefe happily played this role for a while, but his star has since fallen as his legal troubles have mounted. Dana Loesch, the brash radio host who briefly helmed one of the Breitbart sites, has also been pushed aside (<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/talk-radio-host-dana-loesch-files-suit-in-st-louis/article_d2839490-2ed1-5de8-8292-0a3f90204a6d.html">and sued over it</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/the_next_andrew_breitbart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/the_next_andrew_breitbart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Jon Stewart mocks Trump, Palin, Bachmann at CPAC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_mocks_trump_palin_bachmann_at_cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_mocks_trump_palin_bachmann_at_cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Daily Show" shares highlights from some of the GOP convention's most notable speakers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making up for its brief hiatus last week, "The Daily Show" has been catching up on CPAC coverage, last night focusing on GOP all-stars like Michele Bachmann, Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, and the (not) new direction they're leading the Republican party in.</p><p>Of Palin, Stewart opined: "I know where Sarah Palin came from. Someone cast a spell on a YouTube comment and it came to life":</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:424761" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-march-26-2013/pimp-my-right---cpac-2013">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_mocks_trump_palin_bachmann_at_cpac/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_mocks_trump_palin_bachmann_at_cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill O&#8217;Reilly slams Bachmann on Obama &#8220;perks&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bill_oreilly_slams_bachmann_on_obama_perks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bill_oreilly_slams_bachmann_on_obama_perks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox News host said Bachmann is "playing small ball" and making "trivial attacks"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Fox News on Wednesday, Bill O'Reilly criticized Michele Bachmann for her attacks on President Obama's "lifestyle of excess" (which mostly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/michele_bachmann_runs_away_from_reporter/">turned out</a> to be false), and for avoiding follow-up questions about it - first from CNN reporter Dana Bash, then from O'Reilly himself.</p><p>"Now, this would be much ado about nothing, if not for the fact that trivial attacks on President Obama are obscuring serious problems in this country," O'Reilly said, also noting that "every other president in history has lived in comfort, and it looks like President Bush the younger had a bigger White House budget than Barack Obama does."</p><p>"This is a trivial pursuit, and Michelle Bachmann made a mistake pursuing it," he added.</p><p>Bachmann had slammed Obama last week in her CPAC speech for his presidential "perks" that waste taxpayer money, specifically citing the Secret Service, the White House dog-walker, and movie nights.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bill_oreilly_slams_bachmann_on_obama_perks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bill_oreilly_slams_bachmann_on_obama_perks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP “autopsy” dismembers the party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_%e2%80%9cautopsy%e2%80%9d_dismembers_the_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_%e2%80%9cautopsy%e2%80%9d_dismembers_the_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Priebus is right about his party's terminal illness, but he'll have to fight Palin and Limbaugh to save it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a little weird to call an inquiry into the troubles of a living entity an “autopsy” – they’re normally performed on the dead -- but that’s what Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus labeled <a href="http://growthopp.gop.com/default.aspx">his four-month examination of his party’s 2012 defeat.</a> It turns out he believes in truth in labeling.</p><p>Priebus’s thorough-going investigation and its 200 pages of recommendations leave the modern GOP dismembered, its diseased vital organs cut out, their toxicity examined, and the patient lying dead on the table. Some of the recommendations are surprisingly substantive, urging the party to rethink its harsh stands on gay rights and to back comprehensive immigration reform, for instance. It admits many voters see the party as “scary” and “out of touch.” But with the far-right crackpot CPAC convening as its backdrop – Exhibit A in scary and out of touch -- it’s hard to see any organized GOP constituency for such changes, while there’s plenty of party opposition.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_%e2%80%9cautopsy%e2%80%9d_dismembers_the_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_%e2%80%9cautopsy%e2%80%9d_dismembers_the_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC chairman asked about CPAC&#8217;s failed racism panel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC launched a new initiative for minority outreach, shortly after CPAC's ill-fated panel on race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In announcing the Republican National Committee's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%E2%80%9Cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/">plans for minority outreach</a>, Chairman Reince Priebus was asked about CPAC's panel on race that went terribly awry, and how Republicans plan to address members of the base who still hold those kinds of views of minorities.</p><p>"Question about CPAC last week, where a panel on African-American voters dissolved into a shouting match with at least one activist saying that -- talking about voters being systematically disenfranchised. How, given that sort of backdrop in the party, do you plan to overcome those challenges in your role at the RNC?" said National Press Club president Angela Greiling Keane, reading from a written question, during a press conference with Priebus at the National Press Club.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP expert: Anti-gay views hurting party&#8217;s tech recruitment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RNC's former digital strategist says her party's anti-gay views are hurting its recruitment of vital tech talent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its massive <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/130960510/Growth-Opportunity-Project">autopsy report</a> released Monday, the Republican National Committee says the party needs to get a lot better at technology if it ever hopes to win a presidential election again. "A commitment to greater technology and digital resources in all areas referenced above is critical," the task force report notes. And according to a poll conducted by the group, GOP political operatives say data analytics and better digital outreach are among the top priorities for the party heading into the 2014 and 2016 elections.</p><p>But Republicans have one very big problem when it comes to recruiting the talent needed to modernize the party's digital infrastructure: its hostility towards gay people.</p><p>That's according to <a href="http://www.lizmair.com/biography.php">Liz Mair</a>, who was the RNC's online communications director in 2008 before leaving to start her own political consulting firm. Since then, she's worked with Carly Fiorina on her 2010 California Senate bid, with Rick Perry’s 2012 presidential campaign, and with Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s successful reelection effort after a recall attempt last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC&#8217;s 10 craziest moments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/cpacs_10_craziest_moments_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/cpacs_10_craziest_moments_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Geller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wing ideologues gathered from all corners of the country last week, and they didn't disappoint]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> At the Conservative Political Action Conference, the large annual gathering of right-wing activists and followers, people say a lot of crazy things -- too many, in fact, for me to cram into a single story. So I’ve picked a random 10 -- random insofar as they were among those I came across both in my own time at this enormous conference in Oxon Hill, Md., at the Gaylord National Harbor Convention Center just outside of Washington, D.C., and in reading the work of my fellow journalists and muckrakers. The conference took place March 14 - 16.</p><p>Presented, in no particular order, are 10 statements worthy, at least, of an eyeroll.</p><p><strong>1. Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana: Torture is funny. </strong>A featured speaker on CPAC's main stage, Jindal chose to make light this way of the barrage of political rhetoric CPAC attendees signed up to subject themselves to:</p><blockquote><p>If the choice was to hear 70 political speeches or to go<strong>waterboarding</strong>, well, I’d have to think about that.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/cpacs_10_craziest_moments_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/cpacs_10_craziest_moments_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Far less hokey and weird&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/far_less_hokey_and_weird/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/far_less_hokey_and_weird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOProud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buck McKeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a 13 year-old star at CPAC in 2009. When I returned this week, I realized I wasn't the only one who'd changed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does being back at CPAC, the annual gathering of conservatives from all over the country, feel weird?</p><p>That’s the question I got everywhere I turned these past few days. I suppose it was a natural question to ask, seeing as I had been a high profile speaker at the conference in 2009 as a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOUbkdwpZ2o" target="_blank">thirteen year-old conservative wunderkind</a>, before renouncing conservatism <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/08/i_was_a_right_wing_child_star/" target="_blank">last year</a>. So my return this year was an object of fascination to many.</p><p>The answer to the question is: No, it didn’t feel weird. I mean, I guess it should have, but it didn’t. In a way going back to CPAC seemed like going back home and visiting your old libertarian friend from high school: it’s pretty predictable, there’s a familiarity to the situation, you know the <em>kind</em> of stuff she’s going to say, you never know exactly how (or why) she says the stuff she says (and neither does she, in all likelihood), and so long as <em>you</em> don’t talk politics and just listen, you’ll be fine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/far_less_hokey_and_weird/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/far_less_hokey_and_weird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz to CPAC: I filibustered too!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/ted_cruz_to_cpac_i_filibustered_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/ted_cruz_to_cpac_i_filibustered_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delivering the keynote address at CPAC, Ted Cruz wants some of the glory from Rand Paul's filibuster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Sen. Ted Cruz couldn't have known the results of the CPAC straw poll before he wrote his keynote address he delivered here Saturday evening, but he could hardly have targeted his message better if he had. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/rand_paul_wins_cpac_straw_poll/">The poll results</a> showed an overwhelmingly young and libertarian-leaning crowd, and Cruz spent much of the speech trying to take some credit for Rand Paul's popular filibuster against drone secrecy this month, which Cruz assisted.</p><p>Cruz made drones and civil liberties the cornerstone of the speech, using the issue both to take a stand for something he believes in and to hammer President Obama. It played such a prominent role in his speech that one <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/the_coming_rand_paul_ted_cruz_brawl/">has to wonder</a> if Paul, who won the straw poll just moments earlier, would resent Cruz's attempt to steal a bit of his thunder.</p><p>Cruz also relished the opportunity to take a shot at Sen. John McCain, who sharply criticized Paul and Cruz's filibuster, calling them "wacko birds." “If standing for liberty and standing for the Constitution means you’re a wacko bird, then count me a proud wacko bird. I think there are more than a few other wacko birds gathered here today," he said to cheers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/ted_cruz_to_cpac_i_filibustered_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/ted_cruz_to_cpac_i_filibustered_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul wins CPAC straw poll</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/rand_paul_wins_cpac_straw_poll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/rand_paul_wins_cpac_straw_poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marco Rubio comes in second as the conservative confab breaks libertarian ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul won the much-watched CPAC straw poll Saturday evening, edging out Florida Sen. Marco Rubio by 2 percentage points by leading a libertarian turn for the conservative convention.</p><p>After Paul (25 percent) and Rubio (23 percent), came Rick Santorum (8 percent), Chris Christie (7 percent), Paul Ryan (6 percent) and Scott Walker (5 percent). After that, a surprise: Ben Carson, the black neurosurgeon who is a rising star in the conservative movement and spoke earlier today at the conference. Carson tied Ted Cruz for 4 percent, and they were in turn followed by Bobby Jindal and Sarah Palin, who tied with 3 percent each.</p><p>There were 23 candidates listed on the survey, and 44 more who were written in. Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Allen West and Fox News Judge Andrew Napolitano each won some votes, but none got over 1 percent. Jeb Bush withdrew his name from consideration.</p><p>The issue questions showed a strong year for libertarians. About 50 percent said the U.S. should take a step back from foreign policy interventionism, while just a little over a third said they think we need a more muscular military and foreign policy. Eighty percent said they oppose using drones to kill U.S. citizens, while 70 percent said they oppose using them to spy on Americans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/rand_paul_wins_cpac_straw_poll/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/rand_paul_wins_cpac_straw_poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pam Geller: CPAC board member is &#8220;worse&#8221; than Anwar al-Awlaki</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/pam_geller_cpac_board_member_is_worse_than_anwar_al_awlaki/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/pam_geller_cpac_board_member_is_worse_than_anwar_al_awlaki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Geller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPC 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anti-Muslim blogger takes on one of her own at a panel of "uninvited" activists at CPAC]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti-Muslim activist and blogger Pam Geller said Saturday at a CPAC panel of rogue conservative activists that a board member of the group that puts on the annual conservative conference is worse than a terrorist killed by an American drone strike in Yemen.</p><p>Geller said the reason she and the other panelists -- including fellow anti-Muslim activists Frank Gaffney and Robert Spencer -- were barred from CPAC because of the nefarious influence of board members Grover Norquist and Suhail Khan. </p><p>The three anti-Muslim activists have for years accused Norquist and Khan of being members of the Muslim Brotherhood and secret Islamist agents, but Geller took her rhetoric against Khan, a Republican consultant and former Bush White House official, to new heights today. </p><p>“Am I saying that Suhail Khan is as bad as Awlaki? He’s worse!” she said, referring to Anwar al-Awlaki, the American citizen jihadi who was killed by a U.S. drone strike in 2011.</p><p>She added that it was a "crime" that she and the others panelists were not invited to CPAC, warning that the snub is a threat to the freedom of speech. “Free men will have to resort to violence in the absence of the freedom of speech," she added darkly. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/pam_geller_cpac_board_member_is_worse_than_anwar_al_awlaki/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/pam_geller_cpac_board_member_is_worse_than_anwar_al_awlaki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pam Geller shouts down Orly Taitz at CPAC panel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/pam_geller_shouts_down_orly_taitz_at_cpac_panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/pam_geller_shouts_down_orly_taitz_at_cpac_panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Gellar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taitz interrupted the panel with birther questions, but was told she was being "inappropriate"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a panel on Islam and national security by CPAC's "Uninvited" anti-Islam activists, birther queen Orly Tatiz interrupted the question and answer session by repeatedly asking about President Obama's birth certificate, and demanding that the panel explain why it wasn't addressing the topic.</p><p>"I think there's enough substance on this panel, I mean how many topics can you handle," Pamela Geller, the blogger for Atlas Shrugged, shot back. "Inappropriate. really."</p><p>"We are not a birther site," the moderator, from Breitbart.com, told Taitz before she was shushed by the crowd. She left the room shortly after.</p><p>Here's the video, by Salon's Alex Seitz-Wald:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/awY26-jX4hM" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/pam_geller_shouts_down_orly_taitz_at_cpac_panel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/pam_geller_shouts_down_orly_taitz_at_cpac_panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush AG tells CPAC: &#8220;The vast majority&#8221; of Muslims want to impose Sharia law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/bush_ag_tells_cpac_the_vast_majority_of_muslims_want_to_impose_sharia_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/bush_ag_tells_cpac_the_vast_majority_of_muslims_want_to_impose_sharia_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Mukasey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Mukasey bear hugs Breitbart.com and warns that the U.S is not taking the Islamist threat seriously]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"You may not be interested in Islamism, but Islamism is interested in you," warned former Attorney General <a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/01/mukasey_10/">Michael Mukasey</a> at a Saturday CPAC panel of activists so fringy that they were not technically invited to the conference.</p><p>“I want to thank CPAC for making this panel <em>necessary</em>," said the Bush-era attorney general, taking a sarcastic swipe at the organization for frowning on the panelists. "And thank Breitbart.com for making this panel <em>possible</em>."</p><p>The "Uninvited" panel, <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/03/14/The-Uninvited-a-Session-of-Controversial-Speakers-and-Topics">organized by Breitbart media</a>, brought together anti-Muslim activists like Pam Geller and Robert Spencer, and Mukasey fit right in. </p><p>"The vast majority of the world's 1.4 billion Muslims adhere to a view of their religion that agrees on the need to impose Sharia, or Islamic law, on the world," he said. </p><p>Mukasey criticized the Obama administration for being too soft on radical Islam, saying there's been a "systematic purging" in the government of the notion that radical Islam is dangerous. Why? Because of pressure from civil society groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) -- "both of them a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood,” he said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/bush_ag_tells_cpac_the_vast_majority_of_muslims_want_to_impose_sharia_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/bush_ag_tells_cpac_the_vast_majority_of_muslims_want_to_impose_sharia_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin at CPAC: &#8220;Mr. President, you lie!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/palin_at_cpac_mr_president_you_lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/palin_at_cpac_mr_president_you_lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin's speech was all Washington-bashing and crowd-pleasing one-liners]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her big CPAC speech on Saturday, Sarah Palin threw out her usual snappy one-liners (like giving Margaret Thatcher an "Amen Sistah!") and crowd-pleasing gags (like when she pulled out a giant cup of soda and took a dig at Michael Bloomberg: "Bloomberg's not around, my Big Gulp's safe.").</p><p>On gun control, Palin was of course against it, arguing that saying that "that chunk of metal did the crime, is like saying that fork made me fat." She added: "Background checks: A dandy idea Mr. President, should have started with yours!"</p><p>"We don't have leadership coming out of Washington, we have reality television," she continued, saying that "they're being too scripted, too calculated. They're talking about rebuilding the party, how about rebuilding the middle class?"</p><p>"We're not here to re-brand a party, we're here to rebuild a country," Palin added.</p><p>On Obama, Palin said: "Barack Obama promised the most transparent administration ever: Barack Obama, you lie!" And no Palin speech these days is complete without a teleprompter joke: "Mr. President: We admit it. You won. Accept it. Now step away from the teleprompter and do your job."</p><p>She wrapped up the speech with: "If we the people have one message to send to Washington, it's this: Get over yourself."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/palin_at_cpac_mr_president_you_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/palin_at_cpac_mr_president_you_lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party wows CPAC with faux-&#8221;Hunger Games&#8221; trailer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/tea_party_wows_cpac_with_faux_hunger_games_trailer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/tea_party_wows_cpac_with_faux_hunger_games_trailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tea party patriots go viral with a video Roger Ebert calls "Hunger Games" meets "Brave New World"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPAC has its first viral hit -- this video about a "Liberty Party" freeing America from the chains of a "Development Party" that only wants to provide and make you stand in line. Watch it below:</p><p><iframe width="440" height="248" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xReYMOL8nZY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/tea_party_wows_cpac_with_faux_hunger_games_trailer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/tea_party_wows_cpac_with_faux_hunger_games_trailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party responds to ill-fated CPAC racism panel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/tea_party_responds_to_ill_fated_cpac_racism_panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/tea_party_responds_to_ill_fated_cpac_racism_panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K Carl Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The woman who was shouted down by the crowd was "intentionally disruptive and coercive," a statement says]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K. Carl Smith, the speaker at the Tea Party Patriots' CPAC panel on how conservatives can defend themselves against charges of racism, responded to the way the panel <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/cpac_panel_on_racism_goes_awry/">devolved to become rather racist</a>.</p><p>The panel, which took place Friday afternoon, broke down when a liberal black woman, a reporter for Voice of Russia, was shouted down and told that she's "not welcome here" when she objected to Smith's portrayal of Democrats as the ones who started the KKK and pushed to keep slavery in place. Another audience member, Scott Terry, bemoaned the "disenfranchised" white Southern demographic, and implied that slaves should not have to forgive slaveowners, as they were provided with "shelter and food."</p><p>In a statement put out through TPP, Smith called the woman "disruptive and coercive" and said she "rudely interrupted" his remarks.</p><p>Smith did allow that Terry, "made some racially insensitive comments," but noted that in the end Smith "further explained to him the Frederick Douglass Republican Message which [Terry] embraced, bought a book, and we left as friends."</p><p>Here's the full <a href="http://www.teapartypatriots.org/2013/03/statement-from-k-carl-smith/">statement</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/tea_party_responds_to_ill_fated_cpac_racism_panel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/tea_party_responds_to_ill_fated_cpac_racism_panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Walker rails against &#8220;government dependence&#8221; at CPAC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/scott_walker_rails_against_government_dependence_at_cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/scott_walker_rails_against_government_dependence_at_cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wisconsin governor says he wants entitlement reform to stop dependence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who is <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=997A0CB9-9D5C-4BD9-B2D2-E12394924B0D">leaving the door open</a> on a possible 2016 presidential bid, fired up the crowd at CPAC Saturday morning with a speech railing against "government dependence."</p><p>"People don’t dream about growing up and becoming dependent on the government. Immigrants don’t come here to be dependent on the government," Walker said. "It is precisely why we take a day off to celebrate the 4th of July and not the 15th of April." </p><p>In comments that could become controversial, Walker suggested that he doesn't approve of people being dependent on social safety net programs like Social Security and Medicare. Walker said we "need real entitlement reform" in order to move "people from government dependence to true independence." </p><p>The sentiment was reminiscent of Paul Ryan's "makers and takers" rhetoric or Mitt Romney's 47 percent comments.</p><p>He added that the reason he didn't go along with the Medicaid expansion in the Affordable Care Act that would give health coverage to over <a href="http://host.madison.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/scott-walker-rejects-medicaid-expansion-proposes-alternate-plan-to-cover/article_3bf0f724-7617-11e2-b2aa-0019bb2963f4.html">200,000</a> Wisconsinites is because he didn't want to increase dependence. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/scott_walker_rails_against_government_dependence_at_cpac/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/scott_walker_rails_against_government_dependence_at_cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve King at CPAC quietly challenges Rove</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/steve_king_at_cpac_quietly_challenges_rove/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/steve_king_at_cpac_quietly_challenges_rove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I'm still here standing," King said of the last election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his speech to CPAC, Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, touted his win in the 2012 elections despite his super conservative platform, in what was likely a quiet challenge to Karl Rove, whose Super PAC has indicated that it will target King if he decides to run for Senate.</p><p>" I didn't run on jobs and the economy," King told CPAC, adding that he "stood on life and stood on marriage," unlike some of his colleagues in the House. "A bunch of people who have backed away from these challenges don't realize that I'm still here standing."</p><p>"Our job is to step up and defend our values and the full spectrum of constitutional conservatism," he said.</p><p>King is thinking about a run in 2014 to replace retiring Sen. Tom Harkin.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/steve_king_at_cpac_quietly_challenges_rove/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/steve_king_at_cpac_quietly_challenges_rove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s presidential front-runner: Not who you think</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/gops_presidential_front_runner_not_who_you_think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/gops_presidential_front_runner_not_who_you_think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As 2016 speculation begins, don't believe the myth that GOP always picks the presidential candidate “next in line”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All eyes this week are on the CPAC meeting of conservatives, a Beltway gathering that will produce the first straw poll of Republican presidential candidates of the 2016 cycle. (Hey, we’re under three years to the Iowa caucuses now!) But the wiseguy reaction should come soon: All of the jockeying for position is irrelevant, because everybody knows that Republicans always select the “next in line” candidate. For example, Micah Cohen <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/is-it-too-early-for-2016-polls/">claims</a> that Hillary Clinton may benefit from a next in line effect, and that it’s “a dynamic seen in several recent Republican primaries.”</p><p>It’s a myth.</p><p>But expect to see plenty of it. It was a widely circulated myth during the last cycle, and the nomination of Mitt Romney will surely entrench the myth even more. But still, it’s a myth.</p><p>Of course it is true that parties – all parties – are most likely to nominate a candidate who enters the fight as the clear leader. But if “next in line” is more than just a trite statement that strong candidates usually do well, then it doesn’t help to predict anything.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/gops_presidential_front_runner_not_who_you_think/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/gops_presidential_front_runner_not_who_you_think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC panel on racism goes awry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/cpac_panel_on_racism_goes_awry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/cpac_panel_on_racism_goes_awry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K Carl Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[UPDATED] The panel was intended to teach Tea Partyers how to fight back against charges that they are racist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A panel hosted by the Tea Party Patriots, intended to teach CPAC attendees how to fight back against charges that they are racist, devolved quickly into the crowd shouting down a liberal black woman who repeatedly tried to ask questions.</p><p>The panel was run by K. Carl Smith, of the Frederick Douglass Republicans, who mostly advised the predominantly white audience that if they're "sick and tired of being called a racist and a sellout" they should join the Frederick Douglass Republicans. You "can't play the race card on him, you can't play the class warfare card on him," Smith said of Douglass.</p><p>"Race-baiting comes off the table" when you say you are a Frederick Douglass Republican, he said, noting that there are both black and white members of the group. "How are you going to call a Frederick Douglass Republican racist?"</p><p>One audience member, Scott Terry, a self-professed white Southerner,  asked why members of "my demographic are systematically disenfranchised," and why it's "anathema" to be proud of Southern heritage. When Smith told him that Douglass forgave his slavemaster, Terry replied: “For giving him shelter? And food?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/cpac_panel_on_racism_goes_awry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/cpac_panel_on_racism_goes_awry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
