<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Critics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/critics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Must Do&#8217;s: What we like this week</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/must_dos_what_to_watch_and_read_this_weekend_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/must_dos_what_to_watch_and_read_this_weekend_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Listener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garry wills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Steinem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betty Friedan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Duchovny loses a nuclear sub, Rebecca Hall fills the "Downton" void, and Betty Friedan ignites a movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BOOKS</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.railrode.net/2013/02/24/the_myth_of_persecution_early_christians_werent_persecuted/myth_of_persecution/"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/02/myth_of_persecution.jpg" alt="" title="myth_of_persecution" class="size-full wp-image-13209635" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_myth_of_persecution_early_christians_werent_persecuted/">Laura Miller</a> dug into Candida Moss' scholarly work on Christianity's obsession with martyrdom, titled <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0062104527/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Myth of Persecution: How Early Christians Invented a Story of Martyrdom."</a> She writes:</p><blockquote><p>"Moss is thorough, strives for clarity and is genuinely fired up in her concern for the influence of the myth of martyrdom on Western societies. 'The idea of the persecuted church is almost entirely the invention of the 4th century and later,' she writes. This was, significantly, a period during which the church had become 'politically secure,' thanks to Constantine. Yet, instead of providing a truthful account of Christianity’s early years, the scholars and clerics of the fourth century cranked out tales of horrific, systemic violence. These stories were subtly (and not so subtly) used as propaganda against heretical ideas or sects. They also made appealingly gruesome entertainment for believers who were, personally, fairly safe; Moss likens this to contemporary suburbanites reveling in a horror film."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/must_dos_what_to_watch_and_read_this_weekend_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/must_dos_what_to_watch_and_read_this_weekend_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is the real Thomas Jefferson?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/the_thomas_jefferson_wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/the_thomas_jefferson_wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biographies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A heated Op-Ed war among historians is picking up where two controversial new biographies left off this fall]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The firestorm over author Henry Wiencek’s unsparing portrait of Thomas Jefferson, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/037429956/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Master of the Mountain: Thomas Jefferson and His Slaves,"</a> has taken to the pages of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/27/books/henry-wienceks-master-of-the-mountain-irks-historians.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">New York Times </a>and other media outlets with a vengeance. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/books/review/thomas-jefferson-the-art-of-power-by-jon-meacham.html?pagewanted=all">Amid tepid praise for Jon Meacham’s folksy best-seller,  "Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power," which skirts the complex world of slavery</a>, it is Wiencek’s hubristic treatment that has returned Jefferson to center stage in historians’ long-standing war over whom to blame first and foremost for our racist underpinnings as a nation.</p><p>Wiencek seizes upon stray notes in Jefferson’s hand in which the Virginia planter performs cold calculations on the monetary value of slaves. A Scrooge-like Jefferson becomes cruel and uncivilized as he obsesses over the slave economy – which he comes to see as a “convenient engine” of American growth. You don’t remove the human face from slavery and come out ahead. But that is what Henry Wiencek has done to Thomas Jefferson.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/the_thomas_jefferson_wars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/the_thomas_jefferson_wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
