<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > crude oil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/crude_oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>State Department hid oil industry ties in Keystone XL report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/state_dept_hid_oil_industry_ties_in_keystone_xl_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/state_dept_hid_oil_industry_ties_in_keystone_xl_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tarsands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The contractors who authored the report had oil industry ties -- this information was redacted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/">noted earlier this month</a>, following the release of the State Department's Environmental Impact Statement, which<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/"> greenlighted </a>the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline, it emerged that the report's authors were outside contractors with oil industry ties. “Unmentioned by State: the study was contracted out to firms with tar sands extraction clientele," DeSmog Blog's Steve Horn wrote.</p><p>On Thursday <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/keystone-xl-contractor-ties-transcanada-state-department">Mother Jones reported </a>that the State Department not only didn't mention these connections, but took pains to hide them:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/state_dept_hid_oil_industry_ties_in_keystone_xl_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/state_dept_hid_oil_industry_ties_in_keystone_xl_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Dept. says no environmental bar to Keystone XL</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmentalists are already criticizing the report, which supports the pipeline extension]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the chagrin of environmentalists opposed to the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, a State Department report released Friday afternoon stated there is no conclusive environmental reason it should not be built.</p><p>The report makes no recommendations for the president's anticipated decision on whether or not to approve the project, which will carry crude oil from Alberta’s tar sands to the Gulf Coast, while -- according to opponents -- producing high levels of carbon emissions, disturbing communities and adding to the coffers of oil magnates such as the Koch brothers. Friday's lengthy report suggests environmental objections have been overestimated by the project's critics. Via the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/02/us/us-report-sees-no-environmental-bar-to-keystone-pipeline.html?_r=0">New York Times:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
