<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > David Foster Wallace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/david_foster_wallace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Consider David Foster Wallace, journalist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/20/consider_david_foster_wallace_journalist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/20/consider_david_foster_wallace_journalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12365231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There\'s more to DFW than \"Infinite Jest.\" On what would\'ve been his 50th birthday, it\'s time to honor his reporting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, David Foster Wallace would have turned 50 years old, an occasion that has even inspired <a href="https://www.facebook.com/events/328410397197545/">conferences</a>. After his death and canonization into what looks like an entire field of academic study, there remains a popular critical notion that Wallace is to be solely known as a writer of fiction. These are typically readers who swear by "Infinite Jest," a work that is indeed Wallace’s crowning achievement, but by no means his only<em>. </em>They acknowledge his other fiction, but refuse to credit him as having also been a skilled nonfiction reporter. Or, they happily acknowledge that there are many readers that go right to Wallace's essays and skip the fiction altogether, but simply consider this a mistake.</p><p>There even seems to be a now common agreement in academia that readers who champion Wallace’s essays as their favorite work of his are simply missing something and must be less advanced readers, because his nonfiction couldn’t possibly hold up to his one towering opus. It’s a facile assumption that accessibility signals lack of seriousness.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/20/consider_david_foster_wallace_journalist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/20/consider_david_foster_wallace_journalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would David Foster Wallace like this video?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/david_foster_wallace_decemberists_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/david_foster_wallace_decemberists_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2011/08/24/david_foster_wallace_decemberists_video</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A biographer thinks he'd be wowed by the Decemberists' "Infinite Jest" tribute]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Combine the Decemberists and David Foster Wallace -- as "Parks and Recreation" co-creator Michael Schur did in a new <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/allsongs/2011/08/22/139033489/first-watch-the-decemberists-calamity-song">video</a>&#160;for the band's "Calamity Song" -- and it's catnip for the McSweeney's set. Schur and the band brought to life a game from the book called Eschaton -- which is part tennis and part "War Games" -- in a brightly colored and crisply shot video.</p><p>What would David Foster Wallace think? We asked David Lipsky, who spent five days on the road with the late author during his book tour for "Infinite Jest" for a Rolling Stone profile. After Wallace's death, the article became the basis for his book "Although Of Course You End Up Becoming Your Self: A Road Trip With David Foster Wallace." And judging by Wallace's fondness for R.E.M., it's easy to imagine that he would have liked the jangly "Calamity Song" even before the Decemberists tribute to Eschaton.&#160;</p><p><strong>Had you imagined what Eschaton would look like, and how close did the vision in the video come to your sense of the game? What caught your imagination most about the video?</strong>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/david_foster_wallace_decemberists_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/david_foster_wallace_decemberists_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a podiatrist sign became a literary icon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/happy_foot_sad_foot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/happy_foot_sad_foot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Lethem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/05/03/happy_foot_sad_foot</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy Foot/Sad Foot has captured the imagination of David Foster Wallace, Jonathan Lethem and others]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F. Scott Fitzgerald's generation had its green light at the end of the dock in "The Great Gatsby," that symbol of unattainable dreams, and today's young literati have -- a podiatrist's sign?</p><p>The sign for the Sunset Foot Clinic on West Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles is known to some locals as a kind of fortuneteller. On one side is depicted a foot with a woeful face, a bandaged big toe and crutches, while the other side shows an ecstatic foot in gloves and sneakers giving the thumbs-up sign. (Yes, these feet have both arms and legs.) When the sign is working, it rotates, and several residents of the nearby Silver Lake and Echo Park neighborhoods believe that whichever side they see first indicates what sort of day awaits them. Others use the sign as a guide: If they see the Happy Foot, they get to do something fun, while the Sad Foot condemns them to an afternoon of chores.</p><p>The Happy Foot/Sad Foot sign became better known to readers outside the Los Angeles area when it appeared in Jonathan Lethem's 2007 novel, "You Don't Love Me Yet." In that book, the main character, a musician named Lucinda, can see the sign from the window of her apartment: "The two images presented not so much a one-or-the-other choice as an eternal marriage of opposites, the emblem of some ancient foot-based philosophical system. This was Lucinda's oracle: one glance to pick out the sad or happy foot, and a coin was flipped, to legislate any decision she'd delegated to the foot god."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/happy_foot_sad_foot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/happy_foot_sad_foot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Pale King&#8221;: David Foster Wallace&#8217;s last battle</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/pale_king/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/pale_king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/04/10/pale_king</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his final novel, the great writer tackles humanity's most dreaded foe: Boredom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only after his death could David Foster Wallace be properly misunderstood. While he lived, the rap against him was that his work was all brains and pomo tricksiness with no heart, but in the years since his suicide in 2008, he's been recast as paradoxical fusion of Kurt Cobain and Khalil Gibran, a dispenser of inspirational life lessons who was nonetheless too much the sensitive artist to go on living.</p><p>Maybe Wallace was a little of all of these things, though surely he'd have been the first to inform us he was no saint. On the other hand, one of his persistent themes was the self-deluding vanity of cleverness, which sneers at the truths encased in nostrums and mottos simply because they're banal. What he left as the sole counterpoint to the various posthumous Cults of Dave was the unfinished manuscript of <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ISBNInquiry.asp?EAN=%209780316074230">"The Pale King,"</a> his third novel. His editor, Michael Pietsch (who, full disclosure, edited my own book), has assembled the completed portions and included some of Wallace's notes on the narrative's conclusion into a volume that has just been published.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/pale_king/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/pale_king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road trip with David Foster Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/04/although_of_course_you_end_up_becoming_yourself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/04/although_of_course_you_end_up_becoming_yourself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2010/04/04/although_of_course_you_end_up_becoming_yourself</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A young writer spent five intense days with the author of  "Infinite Jest." Here's what they talked about]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;&#160;"What I would love to do is a profile of one of you guys who's doing a profile of me," David Foster Wallace said to David Lipsky in March 1996, when Lipsky was interviewing Wallace for Rolling Stone. It was the tail end of the book tour for Wallace's magnum opus, "Infinite Jest," and Lipsky, a novelist himself, was more than a little dazzled by the acclaim reaped by the 1,079-page novel. "It would be a way," Wallace explained about his idea of profiling Lipsky, "for me to get some of the control back."</p><p>The profile never ran (Rolling Stone sent Lipsky off to write about heroin addicts in the Pacific Northwest instead), and the interview went unused until last year, when Lipsky had the mournful task of writing about the last weeks of Wallace's life; the author killed himself in September 2008. Still, that left five days' worth of 1996 material largely untapped at a time when hunger for Wallace's words and thoughts has never been keener. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/030759243X?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=030759243X">"Although Of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip With David Foster Wallace"</a> is a book-length transcript of those three days, an engaging and occasionally frustrating record of an extended conversation between two young men who had no idea that, 12 years later, the literary world they took for granted would melt away and one of them would be dead by his own hand.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/04/although_of_course_you_end_up_becoming_yourself/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/04/although_of_course_you_end_up_becoming_yourself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 years later, David Foster Wallace is a journalism pioneer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/david_foster_wallace_john_mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/david_foster_wallace_john_mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/03/23/david_foster_wallace_john_mccain</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With hindsight, the late author's Rolling Stone article on John McCain's 2000 campaign now looks prophetic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This month, the Harry Ransom Center in Austin, Texas, cracked open the papers of David Foster Wallace, some 48 years after the writer's birth and a mere 18 months after his suicide.</p><p>The papers offer a closer look into the writer's psyche, a familiar place to his readers. DFW once said that "the shtick" of his nonfiction work -- his essays and reporting -- consisted of the kaleidoscopic insecurities turning inside his head: <em>Oh gosh, look at me: not a journalist who's been sent to do all these journalistic things.</em></p><p>Perhaps the best example of this approach was published in Rolling Stone almost exactly 10 years ago, when Wallace <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/politics2000/feature/2000/04/04/wallace/">wrote about his brief journey with Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign</a>. It was a slapdash assignment, accelerated after McCain's surprise win over George W. Bush in the 2000 New Hampshire primary. Bush was supposed to walk away with the nomination, but all of a sudden, there was McCain with an underdog story that swept every American political journalist off his or her feet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/david_foster_wallace_john_mccain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/david_foster_wallace_john_mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Foster Wallace lives on for an &#8220;Infinite Summer&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/14/infinite_summer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/14/infinite_summer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2009/07/14/infinite_summer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One giant book, 92 days, thousands of readers -- and the world's most ambitious reading group]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many ways to cope with death, but founding an online book club is a pretty unique approach. "When I heard that David Foster Wallace had <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2008/09/14/david_foster_wallace/">died</a>, it was like remembering an assignment that had been due the day before," said Matthew Baldwin. A blogger who regretted never having finished "Infinite Jest," Baldwin founded <a href="http://infinitesummer.org">InfiniteSummer.org</a>, a Web site and collaborative reading experiment that creates a vast literary support group for completing the late author's 1,079-page tome over the course of this summer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/14/infinite_summer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/14/infinite_summer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is the real John McCain?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/29/mccain_96/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/29/mccain_96/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/09/29/mccain</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From David Foster Wallace to Paul Begala, four authors trace the politician's journey from the liberal's conservative to flip-flopping hack.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Twenty or 30 years from now, John McCain will occupy the same historical niche as John Kerry, Bob Dole, Michael Dukakis and Wendell Willkie, in my opinion: a decent guy who never made it to the White House. </p><p> McCain has run for the presidency twice, as two completely different candidates. His campaigns and his image have been shaped by the nasty partisanship of the late 20th and early 21st century, an era that may be remembered as the Late Culture Wars. McCain has never seemed comfortable with that style of politics. Despite his identification as a conservative, he's been willing to reach across the aisle to work with Democrats who shared his concept of reform. In 2000, McCain tried to be a liberal's conservative, holding stream-of-consciousness press conferences on his bus, bashing right-wing preachers as "agents of intolerance" and opposing repeal of Roe v. Wade. Republicans were unimpressed, so when McCain finally won their nomination, he picked as his running mate a woman who had less than two years' experience as a governor -- a woman young enough to be his daughter, or his third wife, even -- but who belongs to a Pentecostal church, baits the Washington media and wouldn't allow any woman to have an abortion. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/29/mccain_96/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/29/mccain_96/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last days of David Foster Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/26/david_foster_wallace_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/26/david_foster_wallace_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2008/09/26/david_foster_wallace</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The people who knew the brilliant writer best talk about the crippling anxiety and spiraling depression of his torturous final weeks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Following David Foster Wallace's suicide on Sept. 12, stunned fans, colleagues and friends paid tribute to the writer in countless <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2008/09/14/david_foster_wallace/">articles</a> and blog posts. They wrote of his imagination and breadth of knowledge, of the ways in which his books and essays inspired a generation of writers and forever altered the literary landscape. They used words like "virtuoso" and "genius." Many, like Jocelyn Zuckerman, the Gourmet editor who went to bat for Wallace's infamous and groundbreaking essay "Consider the Lobster," a masterwork that morphed from a scene piece about a festival in Maine into an essay about whether it's ethical to boil lobsters alive (short answer: no), now mourn the enormous talent the world has lost. "A lot of people," she says, "are really sad for all the books we're not going to get to read." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/26/david_foster_wallace_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/26/david_foster_wallace_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In memory of David Foster Wallace, 1962-2008</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/14/david_foster_wallace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/14/david_foster_wallace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2008/09/14/david_foster_wallace</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A tribute to the great American novelist who left us all a little less alone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He talked about how difficult it was to be a novelist in a world seething with advertisements and entertainment and knee-jerk knowingness and facile irony. He wrote about the maddening impossibility of scrutinizing yourself without also scrutinizing yourself scrutinizing yourself and so on, ad infinitum, a vertiginous spiral of narcissism -- because not even the most merciless self- examination can ignore the probability that you are simultaneously congratulating yourself for your soul-searching, that you are posing. He tried so hard to be sincere and to attend to the world around him because he was excruciatingly aware of how often we are merely "sincere" and "attentive" and all too willing to leave it at that. He spoke of the discipline and of the abrading, daily labor such efforts require because the one imperative that runs throughout all of his work is the intimate connection between humility and wisdom. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/14/david_foster_wallace/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/14/david_foster_wallace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fall of the house of Pynchon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/21/pynchon_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/21/pynchon_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Pynchon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2006/11/21/pynchon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slogging through the science and history, sex and paranoia that crowd Thomas Pynchon's cartoonish new novel, it's obvious his disciples now write better Big Idea novels than he does.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the seldom-mentioned dangers of having a long, storied and influential career as a novelist is the increasing likelihood that a master will live to see his pupils surpass him. Sure enough, slogging through the underbrush of the vast and quintessentially Pynchonian new Thomas Pynchon novel, "Against the Day," it's hard not to think, almost with the turning of every page, of all the other writers who now do this better. The book is titanic, crammed with characters and events both historical and fantastic, a blend of both fuck-you braininess (yes, there are equations) and puerile humor, diverted by both exegeses on science or politics and passages of swashbuckling adventure. It's that kind of novel; you know the type. </p><p> The action, much of it fairly pointless, takes place over a 30-or-so-year span between the 1893 Chicago World's Fair and just after the First World War. It centers around the three sons of Webb Traverse, a Colorado union "organizer" (his political activities seem to consist entirely of blowing things -- and presumably people -- up) who is brutally killed by a couple of thugs hired by an industrialist named Scarsdale Vibe. The Traverse boys -- Frank, Reef and Kit -- spend most of the book drifting in and out of a purposeful determination to avenge their father's murder. Dropping in (literally) every now and then are a troupe of pubescent boy balloonists called the Chums of Chance, whose exploits fighting "the Yellow Fang" and other antagonists are also recorded in a series of "boys' own" pulp novels that the other characters occasionally read. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/21/pynchon_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/21/pynchon_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kinky sex secrets of the lobster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/18/lobster_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/18/lobster_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2004/09/18/lobster</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They're stupid, hyper-aggressive, and they turn each other on by urinating out of bladders in their heads. And David Foster Wallace got everything about them wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be tough to imagine this, but centuries ago American Indians along the New England coast used the masses of lobsters they found on their shores for field fertilizer. As recently as the early part of the 20th century, lobster remained a meal that people in Maine ate reluctantly, if there was nothing else around. But over the past 75 years, the Homarus americanus has gotten an extreme makeover. </p><p> During the fishing season that culminates in the fall, more than 60 million pounds of lobster are pulled out of Maine waters. It's a catch that supports hundreds of lobstering communities and thousands of boats all over the Gulf of Maine. Maine lobster is known around the world and has become one the most distinct delicacies in our national cuisine. During the Christmas season, thousands of lobsters are stuffed into 747s and flown to France, where the crustacean is a popular holiday meal. </p><p> Lobster is unique in our cuisine for another reason. It is pretty much the only remaining animal we kill in the kitchen before eating. Many people are understandably squeamish about plunging a live fellow creature into a pot of boiling water -- even if it looks like a giant bug -- and the ethics of this practice have been disputed for decades. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/09/18/lobster_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/18/lobster_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war for the soul of literature</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/07/15/peck_wood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/07/15/peck_wood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Eggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Franzen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2004/07/15/peck_wood</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two critics, one revered and the other almost universally reviled, protest that the literary world has been taken over by big, bad, "ambitious" novels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time -- about 15 or 20 years ago, to be precise -- when people complained about contemporary fiction, they complained about minimalism. The quintessential minimalist work was a short story written in austere, emotionally muted prose. It described a scene of domestic despair or disconnection fully understood by its protagonist only in a closing moment of bleak epiphany. It was written by Raymond Carver or Ann Beattie or an acolyte thereof, and edited by Gordon Lish. It was published in the New Yorker. </p><p> Whole books were dedicated to denouncing this trend and the master's of fine arts writing programs that were accused of popping out graduates who in turn popped out minimalist stories like a chain of identical and tasteless breakfast sausages. The days of minimalism's preeminence, if it ever truly had that, are gone, but the habit of raising a hue and cry about the state of contemporary fiction has proven addictive. We read different kinds of novels now, and so we have a different sort of critic to denounce them. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/07/15/peck_wood/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/07/15/peck_wood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The horror, the horror</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/06/30/wallace_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/06/30/wallace_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2004/06/30/wallace</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace delves into the heart of human darkness in his chilling new story collection.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With his new story collection, <a href="/09/features/wallace1.html">David Foster Wallace</a> has perfected a particularly subtle form of horror story -- so subtle, in fact, that to judge from the book's reviews, few of his readers even realize that's what these stories are. The oblivion in this collection's title is what most of his characters are after. They have a past they want to forget, a future they'd prefer to avoid, and things about themselves they'd rather not think about at all. When you find out what they're running from, you can't blame them. </p><p>Wallace can still be funny, but his humor has been creeping away from the playful, omnivorous sort on display in his first three books ("The Broom of the System," "The Girl With the Curious Hair" and the reputation-making novel "Infinite Jest") and toward a bleaker variety -- as if he were making a slow switch in allegiance from Thomas Pynchon to Samuel Beckett. His style remains maximalist, but his focus has narrowed and deepened. "Infinite Jest" seemed a bulgy monster, a gathering of enthusiasms that were always threatening to escape the corral of the novel and go feral. "Brief Interviews With Hideous Men," the story collection that followed it, was a grab bag of experimental vignettes and more-conventional efforts that nosed around the problem of human malice. "Oblivion," by contrast, is of a piece, relentlessly trained on the things people do and say to bear the unbearable. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/06/30/wallace_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/06/30/wallace_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He&#8217;s a lover &#8212; and also a hater</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/12/peck_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/12/peck_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Eggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Franzen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Lethem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2003/12/12/peck</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dale Peck, the madman critic famous for his trash jobs on Moody, Eggers and Franzen, talks about forgiving his abusive father in his new "fictional memoir" and wonders why we can't all get along.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale Peck the novelist keeps digging in, but Peck the critic is backing off the fight for literature's soul. The 36-year-old author has written three well-reviewed, ambitious novels, a handful of short stories, and a new "fictional memoir," "What We Lost," about his father's wretched childhood. But he's better known lately for his long, savage book reviews, particularly one in the New Republic in June 2002 that began, "Rick Moody is the worst writer of his generation." </p><p> Peck charges on for almost 6,000 words from there, flogging every misused dash and antecedent-less pronoun in two paragraphs from Moody's memoir "The Black Veil"; calling the book "lies" and "criminal," and then extending his fuck-you to the horse Moody rode in on. Peck lashes Moody together with Davids Foster Wallace and Eggers, Jonathans Franzen and Lethem, and assorted other Lit Boys as "heirs to the bankrupt tradition that began with the diarrheic flow of words that is 'Ulysses'; continued on through the incomprehensible ramblings of late Faulkner and the sterile inventions of Nabokov ... the ridiculous dithering of Barth and Hawkes and Gaddis ... wasting of a talent as formidable as Pynchon's ... and the stupid -- just plain stupid -- tomes of DeLillo." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/12/12/peck_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/12/peck_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s bigger than a kazillion?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/11/12/infinity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/11/12/infinity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2003/11/12/infinity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace provides an entertaining tour of the mind-blowingly big numbers -- and establishes that some infinities are larger than others.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greatest thrill I remember from my girlhood -- better than my first kiss, first airplane flight, first taste of mango, first circuit around the ice rink without clinging to a grown-up's sleeve -- was the heart-lifting moment when I first understood Georg Cantor's Diagonal Proof of the nondenumerability of the real numbers. This proof, the Mona Lisa of set theory (to my mind, the most satisfying branch of mathematics), changed the way mathematicians thought about infinity. </p><p> If you've ever thought much about numbers or talked with a preschooler learning to count, you've probably encountered some of the questions that led to Cantor's discovery a century ago. How many natural numbers are there? (Naturals are just the numbers we count with: 1, 2, 3, 4 and so on up forever.) And what about the even naturals: 2, 4, 6, 8 and so on? Infinitely many in both cases, right? OK, but are there more naturals than evens? Clearly every even natural number is a natural number, but there are plenty of naturals that aren't even -- namely the odds: 3, 5, 7, 9 and so on. Does that mean that the set of naturals is bigger than the set of even naturals? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/11/12/infinity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/11/12/infinity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sound bite and the fury</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/19/frey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/19/frey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2003 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Eggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Frey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Franzen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Safran Foer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2003/04/19/frey</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Literary bad boy James Frey says Dave Eggers can eat his dust. His self-promotion is tiresome, but his addiction memoir, "A Million Little Pieces," shows he has the right stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should celebrity be classified as a controlled substance? Consider first the available medical literature: rambling and confused statements, delusional behavior, outbursts of megalomania, and in the case of People magazine's Steven Cojocaru, unflattering shags -- all triggered by the sudden and confounding infusion of quasi-fame. The blazingly dysfunctional path of today's insta-celebrities is not something children should be exposed to or, come to think of it, most adults. Enough fooling around, then. Bring on the PSA campaign. </p><p>And for campaign spokesman, please consider James Frey, the rising author who has, in effect, done the thing he swore never to do: He has traded in one addiction for another. That is, he has written a ballsy, bone-deep memoir about coming off drugs -- titled "A Million Little Pieces" -- which he is now promoting with such hopped-up, synthetically fueled mania that reading his interviews becomes a form of retox. </p><p> "A Million Little Pieces" has all the hallmarks of a Publishing Event. An eye-grabbing cover: the Bu&ntilde;uellian image of a human hand sheathed in micro-pills. A movie-ready subject: the near-death spiral and phoenixlike rebirth of a rich suburban kid. (Boy, Interrupted.) A string of high-profile blurbers: Pat Conroy, Bret Easton Ellis, Gus Van Sant. And, most telling of all, a publicity Anschluss, engineered by Random House's genteel Nan Talese imprint. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/19/frey/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/19/frey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Foster Wallace: Ain&#039;t McCain grand?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/04/wallace_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/04/wallace_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2000/feature/2000/04/04/wallace</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A postmodern literary lion slobbers all over the former candidate in Rolling Stone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he writer <sup><a href="index2.html#link1">1</a></sup> in the magazine <sup><a href="index2.html#link2">2</a></sup> said the candidate <sup><a href="index2.html#link3">3</a></sup> was a hero <sup><a href="index2.html#link4">4</a></sup>.</p><p>I don't really know. I was wasn't there and someone of my age, 39, grew up precisely at that time <sup><a href="index2.html#link5">5</a></sup> when we began to actually question the motives, the actions, the deeds and the (in sum) <i>point</i> of the oh-so-sacred activities -- the songs, the protests, the sit-ins, the <i>riots,</i> man -- of the 1960s; and I even went to Berkeley where you were <i>indoctrinated</i> into the utter righteousness of the guys who were on the very real front lines of a battle with cops and sometimes worse (National Guard troops!) with shields and bayonets and tear gas and actual guns <sup><a href="index2.html#link6">6</a></sup>; but I seem to remember that amid all the protest over, the clamor about, the hatred for the war one thing that a lot of people felt strongly about (beyond the dislike of Nixon, or Johnson, the debate of whether or not there were dominos dropping in Southeast Asia, whether the protests at home might be the catalyst for something bigger, something new, politically, that might change everything and really, for the first time, put power into the hand of the people) was the feeling, again I would think felt by just about everyone against the war, that amid their comforts, their stability, the opportunities open to them to do whatever they wanted, be what they wanted, in the most luxurious place in the most luxurious country in the most luxurious time in the history of the world, that there was something somehow <i>off</i> in the fact there was concurrently going on the expenditure of extraordinary sums, vast sums, <i>lots</i> of money, on steel, on rubber, on circuitry, on computers, on radar, fuel dials, switches, rotors, cams, pistons, stabilizers, all sorts of complicated stuff like that, all in the service of "delivery" -- as the word of the time went, as some Pentagon apparatchik might have put it -- of bombs up the asses of Vietnamese civilians.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/04/wallace_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/04/wallace_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Ex-Files: New Stories About Old Flames&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/14/ferris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/14/ferris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/02/14/ferris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty-eight writers try to figure out what we want from our ex-lovers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>urning to a book of stories about ex-lovers,  you might ask yourself what you want from stories about ex-lovers. A wailing country song or a Latin revenge scenario are good places to start, but it's also understandable if you want an exorcism -- what Frank Sinatra could have used when he moaned to his pack, "Ava! Why can't I get this girl out of my plasma!?"</p><p>In "The Ex-Files," editor Blake Ferris has assembled what must be history's<br />
first anthology of screeds and homilies to former boy and girlfriends. It's  a<br />
book rich with tenacious, if fictional, Avas. These creatures have inspired no less than <a href="/books/int/1998/03/cov_si_31intb.html">Dorothy Allison,</a> <a href="/09/features/wallace1.html">David Foster Wallace</a> and <a href="/sneaks/sneakpeeks960905.html">Junot Diaz.</a> But strange to say, by the end of the collection it still may not be entirely clear who counts as an "ex." Maybe that's why they're hard to forget; they're hard to identify.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/14/ferris/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/14/ferris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A baffling man</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/28/hideousmen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/28/hideousmen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Foster Wallace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/1999/05/28/hideousmen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although David Foster Wallace doesn&#039;t act the way an author should, his brilliant new book is filled with desperation, loneliness and addiction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b> couple of years ago the young novelist, essayist and short story writer David<br />
Foster<br />
Wallace showed up on the "Charlie Rose" show. It was a delightfully painful<br />
television experience. The hook for the appearance was that Wallace's<br />
massive<br />
novel, "Infinite Jest," had just been issued in paperback.</p><p>The publicity that surrounded Wallace and that difficult, brilliant, heavily promoted but little-read novel provides a good working example of the differences between the agent-editor-media matrix's vision of a serious writer and one who actually <i>is</i> serious. In the happy publicity vocabulary of Nice Cover Quotes and glossy mag author profiles, Wallace is a soulful Gen-Xer with long, light brown hair, an eccentric bandanna, a girlfriend, a tennis background and the added glamour of deep thoughts and a successful rehab history.</p><p>In reality, however, Wallace is a strange, very intelligent man with bad clothes who looks in public as if he'd prefer to be wearing a full mask but makes do with a scarf over his head. He also happens to be one of the most ambitious and talented writers of his generation. His work is bitingly funny and remarkably, even wildly, imaginative; at the same time he aims for very large psychological, emotional and social issues, issues of how we live or fail to live, love and fail to love, survive or destroy ourselves.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/28/hideousmen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/28/hideousmen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

