<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Debt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/debt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 19:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the pro-austerity hypocrites</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/how_pro_austerity_executives_use_loopholes_to_break_the_debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/how_pro_austerity_executives_use_loopholes_to_break_the_debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fix the Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowles-Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simpson-Bowles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fix the Debt coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wealthy corporate titans behind Fix the Debt are using a loophole to avoid paying taxes, a new report charges]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major corporations backing a group founded by the pro-austerity icons Simpson and Bowles take advantage of a loophole to avoid paying taxes on some of what they pay their CEOs, according to a new report.</p><p><a href="http://www.ips-dc.org/files/6030/ftd%20exec%20pay%20tax%20loophole.pdf">The report</a>, from the liberal Institute for Policy Studies, finds that between 2009 and 2011, top executives at the 90 publicly held corporate members of the Fix the Debt coalition raked in at least $953 million -- and as much as $1.6 billion -- through the “performance pay” loophole, which counts some executive compensation as a tax-deductible business expense, instead of a salary. Fix the Debt, founded by Alan  Simpson and Erskine Bowles, is one of the many groups tied to Wall Streeter cum policy entrepreneur <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Portal:Fix_the_Debt">Pete Peterson</a>, who has spent the last 20 years trying to reduce the debt, in large part through cuts to programs like Social Security and Medicare. The group has attracted some of the largest corporations in the country as sponsors, as well as former lawmakers, giving it serious clout in Washington.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/how_pro_austerity_executives_use_loopholes_to_break_the_debt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/how_pro_austerity_executives_use_loopholes_to_break_the_debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slow growth creates debt, not the other way around</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/tk_5_partner_14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/tk_5_partner_14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight Eisenhower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As any FDR historian can tell you, government spending is the best stimulus for a slumping economy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the election of 1952 my father voted for Dwight Eisenhower. When I asked him why he explained that “FDR’s debt” was still burdening the economy — and that I and my children and my grandchildren would be paying it down for as long as we lived.</p><p>I was only six years old and had no idea what a “debt” was, let alone FDR’s. But I had nightmares about it for weeks.</p><p>Yet as the years went by my father stopped talking about “FDR’s debt,” and since I was old enough to know something about economics I never worried about it. My children have never once mentioned FDR’s debt. My four-year-old grandchild hasn’t uttered a single word about it.</p><p>By the end of World War II, the national debt was 120 percent of the entire economy. But by the mid-1950s, it was half that.</p><p>Why did it shrink? Not because the nation stopped spending. We had a Korean War, a Cold War, we rebuilt Germany and Japan, sent our GI’s to college and helped them buy homes, expanded education at all levels, and began constructing the largest public-works program in the nation’s history — the interstate highway system.</p><p>“FDR’s debt” shrank in proportion to the national economy because the national economy grew so fast.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/tk_5_partner_14/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/tk_5_partner_14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whoops! Turns out debt doesn&#8217;t ruin economies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/whoops_turns_out_debt_doesnt_ruin_economies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/whoops_turns_out_debt_doesnt_ruin_economies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neoliberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A paper justifying international austerity measures had a couple of mistakes that totally undermine its argument]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff are two very, very well-respected Harvard economists. They are the authors of <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/may/13/our-giant-banking-crisis/?pagination=false">a very well-received account of the financial crisis and its antecedents</a>. In 2010 they released a paper that is among the most influential economic papers of the modern era. The paper argued that countries with a debt-to-GDP ratio above 90 percent average negative GDP growth. (The paper also suggested that correlation is causation, in the direction neoliberal misers prefer.) In other words, this was, for many people, concrete proof -- with numbers and a chart -- that government debt is bad for the economy and should be reduced even in the midst of a recession and an employment crisis. The authors have briefed leaders and legislators around the world on their finding, and the paper has essentially been used to justify most debt hysteria around the world, since its publication.</p><p>But! Whoops, turns out they were wrong, about that one central fact that has been repeated as the gospel truth by purveyors of Tough Talk on debt the world over for the last three years. They screwed up their spreadsheet. Turns out average GDP growth in countries with debt-GDP ratios 90 percent and higher is positive, not negative.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/whoops_turns_out_debt_doesnt_ruin_economies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/whoops_turns_out_debt_doesnt_ruin_economies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s go-to economics study debunked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/gops_go_to_economics_study_debunked_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/gops_go_to_economics_study_debunked_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth in the Time of Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carmen Reinhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Rogoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that high public debt may not stifle economic growth as two popular economists have theorized]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> In 2010, economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff released a paper, <a href="http://www.nber.org/papers/w15639.pdf">"Growth in a Time of Debt."</a> Their "main result is that...median growth rates for countries with public debt over 90 percent of GDP are roughly one percent lower than otherwise; average (mean) growth rates are several percent lower." Countries with debt-to-GDP ratios above 90 percent have a slightly negative average growth rate, in fact.</p><p>This has been one of <a href="http://www.reinhartandrogoff.com/related-research/growth-in-a-time-of-debt-featured-in">the most cited stats</a> in the public debate during the Great Recession. Paul Ryan's Path to Prosperity budget states their study "found conclusive empirical evidence that [debt] exceeding 90 percent of the economy has a significant negative effect on economic growth." The <em>Washington Post </em>editorial board takes it as an economic consensus view, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/debt-reduction-hawks-and-doves/2013/01/26/3089bd52-665a-11e2-93e1-475791032daf_story.html">stating that</a> "debt-to-GDP could keep rising — and stick dangerously near the 90 percent mark that economists regard as a threat to sustainable economic growth."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/gops_go_to_economics_study_debunked_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/gops_go_to_economics_study_debunked_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government profits on student debt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/student_loan_rates_rise_the_government_profits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/student_loan_rates_rise_the_government_profits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Loan Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Student borrowers pay record interest rates on government-backed loans, boosting Dept. of Education coffers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the havoc a generation of heavily indebted young people promises to wreak on the economy, commentators on the student debt crisis have for some time pointed out that the federal government has considerable interest in student borrowers remaining in the red. New figures further back this up. As the Huffington Post<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/09/student-loan-rates-debt-economy_n_3048216.html"> reported</a> Tuesday, the Education Department is expected to earn $33.5 billion off student loans made during the 2013 fiscal year, according to budget documents. "The agency’s Direct Loan program delivered a $24 billion profit on loans made in 2012, and nearly $27.5 billion on 2011 loans. All told, over the last five fiscal years, the Education Department has generated $101.8 billion in profit from student borrowers, thanks to low borrowing costs for the government and fixed interest rates for students, budget documents show," reported HuffPo, noting, "Some student advocates have charged that the department is profiting off the backs of students."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/student_loan_rates_rise_the_government_profits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/student_loan_rates_rise_the_government_profits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU: Ohio illegally jailing debtors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/aclu_ohio_illegally_jailing_debtors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/aclu_ohio_illegally_jailing_debtors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debtors' prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The modern-day debtors' prisons push poor defendants further into destitution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COLUMBUS, Ohio — Several courts in Ohio are illegally jailing people because they are too poor to pay their debts and often deny defendants a hearing to determine if they’re financially capable of paying what they owe, according to an investigation released Thursday by the Ohio chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.</p><p>The ACLU likens the problem to modern-day debtors’ prisons. Jailing people for debt pushes poor defendants farther into poverty and costs counties more than the actual debt because of the cost of arresting and incarcerating individuals, the report said.</p><p>“The use of debtors’ prison is an outdated and destructive practice that has wreaked havoc upon the lives of those profiled in this report and thousands of others throughout Ohio,” the report said.</p><p>Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor of the Ohio Supreme Court, responding to the ACLU’s request to take action, promised to review the findings. O’Connor told the group in a letter Wednesday: “you do cite a matter that can and must receive further attention.”</p><p>The report says courts in Huron, Cuyahoga, and Erie counties are among the worst offenders.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/aclu_ohio_illegally_jailing_debtors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/aclu_ohio_illegally_jailing_debtors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP: We&#8217;ve been lying all along</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowles-Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boehner's admission that we don't really have a debt crisis reveals his party's ulterior, program-cutting motives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I'd write these words, but here goes: Thank you, John Boehner. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for finally admitting on national television that all the fiscal cliffs, sequestrations and budget battles you've created are, indeed, artificially fabricated by ideologues and self-interested politicians and not the result of some imminent crisis that's out of our control.</p><p>America owes this debt of gratitude to Boehner after he finally came clean on yesterday's edition of <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/03/17/boehner_agrees_with_obama_we_do_not_have_an_immediate_debt_crisis.html">ABC's "This Week"</a> and admitted that "we do not have an immediate debt crisis." (His admission was followed up by Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, who quickly echoed much the same sentiment on <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/paul-ryan-tells-cbs-bob-schieffer-we-do-not-have-a-debt-crisis/">CBS' "Face the Nation"</a>).</p><p>In offering up such a stunningly honest admission, the GOP leader has put himself on record as agreeing with President Obama, who has previously acknowledged that demonstrable reality. But the big news here isn't just about the politics of a Republican House speaker tacitly admitting they agree with a Democratic president. It is also about a bigger admission revealing the fact that the GOP's fiscal alarmism is not merely some natural reaction to reality, but a calculated means to other ideological ends.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street debt pushes up NYC transit fares</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/wall_street_debt_pushes_up_nyc_transit_fares/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/wall_street_debt_pushes_up_nyc_transit_fares/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Subway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fare hikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Yorkers are about to get their fourth fare hike in five years. Jesse Myerson explains who gets the raises]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalist Jesse Myerson, in a video for <a href="http://www.nofarehikes.net/">NoFareHikes.net</a>, explains how bank debts, not increased wages for workers, are driving up the price of public transport in New York (via @nofarehikes):</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lqsODbhXbDY" frameborder="0" width="448" height="252"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/wall_street_debt_pushes_up_nyc_transit_fares/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/wall_street_debt_pushes_up_nyc_transit_fares/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress is ravaging the economy all by itself</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/could_congress_take_the_hippocratic_oath_on_the_economy_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/could_congress_take_the_hippocratic_oath_on_the_economy_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest CBO data reveals that government is cutting economic growth in half, with no discernible benefit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you wanted to be (overly) generous in your interpretation of the CBO data out yesterday, you might say that we’re sacrificing the near term for the longer term. That is, we’re accepting lower economic growth rates and higher unemployment now in exchange for lower-budget deficits, which will, according to CBO, be better for growth in the future.</p><p>Here’s how they frame the issue:</p><p><em>… less fiscal tightening this year would lead to stronger growth in 2013 but, if not accompanied by sufficient additional tightening in later years, would also restrain real output and income in the middle of the decade and beyond owing to higher federal debt.</em></p><p>I must say, though, that I find this all a bit of a muddle. In 2013, according to the budget office, fiscal cuts — both tax increases like the end of the payroll tax break and spending cuts like the sequester (CBO assumes it will be implemented to the tune of $85 billion in cuts starting next month) — are cutting the economy’s growth rate pretty much in half, from a bit below 3 percent to 1.4 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/could_congress_take_the_hippocratic_oath_on_the_economy_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/could_congress_take_the_hippocratic_oath_on_the_economy_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Student loans: The next housing bubble</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/student_loans_the_next_housing_bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/student_loans_the_next_housing_bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13190346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[College students accrue hundreds of thousands in debt with little hope of paying it back. It's a cruel game]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American system of higher education is increasingly becoming a fiscal disaster for ever-larger numbers of students who move through it.  That disaster is being caused by a combination of terrible incentives, institutional greed -- and the pervasive myth that more education is the cure for economic inequality.</p><p>The extent of this myth is highlighted by a new <a href="http://centerforcollegeaffordability.org/research/studies/underemployment-of-college-graduates ">report</a> from the Center for College Affordability and Productivity, which indicates that nearly half of all employed college graduates have jobs that require less than a four-year college education. Despite such sobering statistics, the higher-education complex remains remarkably successful at ensuring that American taxpayers fund the acquisition of educational credentials that, in many cases, leave the people who obtain them worse off than they were before they enrolled.</p><p>Far from being “priceless,” as the promoters of ever-more spending on higher education would have Americans believe, both undergraduate and post-graduate education is turning out to be a catastrophic investment for many young and not-so-young adults.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/student_loans_the_next_housing_bubble/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/student_loans_the_next_housing_bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Roberts bankrupts law students</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/john_roberts_bankrupts_law_students/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/john_roberts_bankrupts_law_students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13182665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court justice is paid thousands to "teach" in Europe -- and his law students are footing the bill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any privileged person in this country who wants to remain complacent about the social status quo would be well-advised not to consider exactly where his money comes from. Here’s a small but telling example. Federal judges are required to file disclosure forms regarding other sources of income they may have besides their federal salaries and benefits. A <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/judge/roberts-jr-john-g/">glance</a> at Chief Justice John Roberts’ 2009 form  (the most recent available to the public) reveals the following entry:</p><p>“New England School of Law, Summer Program, Galway, Ireland – teaching stipend: $15,000.”</p><p>Another part of the form reveals that the same school reimbursed Roberts for his airfare, meals and lodging for at least the two-week period during which the course -- on the history of the Supreme Court -- was held.  Roberts co-taught the course, which met seven times for two-hour periods, with a law professor, Richard Lazarus.</p><p>Roberts and Lazarus taught the same course on the scenic island of Malta last summer, and will do so again amid the charming old world architecture of Prague this July.  (Lazarus did not respond to my request for information regarding what he was being paid to teach the course or how responsibility for teaching and grading it was divided between himself and the chief justice).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/john_roberts_bankrupts_law_students/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/john_roberts_bankrupts_law_students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debt is ingrained in America&#8217;s way of life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/debt_is_ingrained_in_americas_way_of_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/debt_is_ingrained_in_americas_way_of_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13162797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Graeber's sweeping history "Debt: The First 5,000 Years" helps explain our country's basic power dynamics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a> DEBT IS UBIQUITOUS. It is also insidious, since debt imposes a power relationship (amplified by the state) between borrower and creditor. We are diminished by debt. The ongoing financial crisis has revealed the degree to which most Americans (myself included, alas) are seriously indebted — and being so, we are more controlled than controlling.</p><p>David Graeber — of Occupy Wall Street fame — has written, in <em>Debt: The First 5,000 Years</em>, a grand intellectual project and a call for action. He investigates debt across time and across cultures and finds it to be a primary institution, preceding exchange, money and any notion of “the economy.” Debt is a building block for ever more elaborate social organization, because it creates fluid structures of subordination. Though in principle the sum of all debts should equal the sum of all credits, in practice debtors are many and creditors few. Today, there is growing concern about income inequality in America — but it is wealth inequality that captures the relation of debtors and creditors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/debt_is_ingrained_in_americas_way_of_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/debt_is_ingrained_in_americas_way_of_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s credit system is broken</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/americas_credit_system_is_broken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/americas_credit_system_is_broken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OKCupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've carefully avoided debt my entire working life. So why am I having so much trouble getting a credit card?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a> My (early) New Year’s resolution was to get a credit card. You may remember that <a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/not-owning-credit-card">I have never had a credit card</a>. And thus if I were on the dating market, my OKCupid inquiries <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/26/business/even-cupid-wants-to-know-your-credit-score.html">would be flatly rejected</a>. It’s not that I have a bad score. I just don’t have one. I had a good score when I was dutifully paying off my student loan after I graduated, but then through paying dirt-cheap rent in Harlem and never paying for cable I was able to pay off the loan. Since then I haven’t owned any credit products. I’ve paid my rent on time every month and paid every bill before the due date. But those things don’t make their way over to FICO. I’ve thus landed myself in quite the Catch-22 that speaks volumes about the lending industry and our reliance on it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/americas_credit_system_is_broken/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/americas_credit_system_is_broken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must I repay the jerk?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/must_i_repay_the_jerk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/must_i_repay_the_jerk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Distance Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find a job, he lends me the money, I move 8,000 miles to be with him. Then he says he's not really feeling it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>Earlier this year, two and half years into a long-distance relationship and after over a year of serious job searching, I finally found a job that allowed me to move 8,000 miles across the world to join my boyfriend. About five weeks later, he finally said what had been pretty obvious since I arrived -- he was no longer interested in me or our relationship. He refused to explain or seek counseling, saying  the "feeling was gone." While breaking up, things were said and done, or not said or done by both of us and we are out of contact, permanently, I suspect.</strong></p><p><strong>I moved out and things are generally going OK. Life here is much more costly on a solo budget and I sometimes feel lonely being so far from anyone I really know or who shares my language/culture. So, I've reframed this as a one- or two-year adventure and this helps me feel more positive when I miss my friends and family back home. I can still get angry that he pulled the rug out from under me so my first impression at the new job was of a distracted person with personal issues. Or that the great new chapter opened with being pushed away and left alone. But, I've turned things around at work and I recognize I am better off without him.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/must_i_repay_the_jerk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/must_i_repay_the_jerk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Unhappiness hurts fiscal health</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/study_unhappiness_hurts_fiscal_health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/study_unhappiness_hurts_fiscal_health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you sad because you're broke, or broke because you're sad? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it's treating yourself to an extravagant dinner after a stressful day or picking up a new pair of boots during a nasty breakup, people tend to spend more when they're feeling blue. Anecdotal evidence like this inspired researchers at Harvard University to look into the matter and what they found probably won't surprise you: feeling down can take a serious toll on your wallet.</p><p>As part of the study, a select group was shown a sad movie (this <a title="The Champ is the Saddest Movie Ever Made " href="http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/07/25/saddest-movie-ever-made-science-knows-answer/" target="_blank">one</a>, perhaps?) and were then asked to make financial decisions. Compared to subjects who had not watched the video, the sad group were far more likely to make choices that presented a short-term benefit, but were less profitable in the long run.</p><p>Blame it on "present bias," a phenomenon that makes us crave immediate gratification at the expense of even greater rewards later on. It's a tendency that many people exhibit in everyday life, but add a little melancholy into the mix and you've got yourself a recipe for financial disaster. Lead researcher Jennifer Lerner explains that "compared with neutral emotion, sadness -- and not just any negative emotion -- made people more myopic, and therefore willing to forgo greater future gains in return for instant gratification."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/study_unhappiness_hurts_fiscal_health/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/study_unhappiness_hurts_fiscal_health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New group: America&#8217;s youth cry out for sensible, moderate deficit reduction</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/new_group_americas_youth_cry_out_for_sensible_moderate_deficit_reduction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/new_group_americas_youth_cry_out_for_sensible_moderate_deficit_reduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Peterson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13070688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A hip new group of "activists" pretends the youth believe in austerity -- and lower taxes for the rich]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some inspiring news for these often dark times: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/11/12/meet-the-millennial-deficit-hawks/?wprss=rss_ezra-klein">A group of young activists</a> is making headlines for their fight against debt. It is good to see "The Youth" getting involved, and obviously crushing consumer and student loan debt is deeply hurting a generation already disproportionately harmed by the Great Recession.</p><p>Haha, just kidding, they are actually getting headlines because they're launching a campaign about <em>the federal debt.</em> Because, you know, that is a thing kids care about. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/11/12/meet-the-millennial-deficit-hawks/?wprss=rss_ezra-klein">Let's meet these do-gooders</a>, courtesy of Suzy Khimm at Ezra Klein's respected "WonkBlog."</p><blockquote><p>A group of young deficit hawks is making it their mission to warn the Millennial Generation about the dangers of an out-of-control deficit through a new organization called the Can Kicks Back. “The debt is now the top of line issue for most young people. We believe it’s the most important issue,” said Ryan Schoenike, president of the group. “Not addressing this issue leads to a lower situation — higher taxes, less jobs, more debt.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/new_group_americas_youth_cry_out_for_sensible_moderate_deficit_reduction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/new_group_americas_youth_cry_out_for_sensible_moderate_deficit_reduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get ready for the phony debt fight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/get_ready_for_the_phony_debt_fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/get_ready_for_the_phony_debt_fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign to fix the debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13055187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both candidates agree: The national debt is the most urgent challenge facing the nation. But it's not -- at all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is almost certain to be a renewed push for cutting the budget regardless of who wins the election. This is a big part of Romney's and the GOP’s agenda. However, President Obama has also indicated a willingness to cut most areas of spending, including Social Security and Medicare, as part of a “Grand Bargain.”</p><p>In this context, the decision of a group of corporate CEOs to form a new group, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-26/ceos-back-debt-concepts-broad-enough-to-please-both-sides">the Campaign to Fix the Debt</a>, to push for a budget deal can be seen as a big deal. This group brings back memories of a 1970s TV ad that featured a middle-aged man wearing a bad toupee pushing totally fake-looking toupees. The narrator assured viewers that no one would recognize that these toupees were not your real hair saying, “I wouldn’t lie to you, I’m the president of the company.”</p><p>It’s hard not to think of this ad when listening to the<a href="http://www.fixthedebt.org/"> agenda being pushed</a> by the Campaign to Fix the Debt. This is yet another project supported by Wall Street investment banker Peter Peterson. For the last two decades Peterson has used his fortune to bankroll a number of organizations that were ostensibly pushing fiscal responsibility, but always had the same punch line: cut Social Security and Medicare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/get_ready_for_the_phony_debt_fight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/get_ready_for_the_phony_debt_fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More and more families moving in together</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/more_and_more_families_moving_in_together/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/more_and_more_families_moving_in_together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seniors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13058337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Census data shows 4.3 million U.S. households include a parent, a grandparent and a child]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Struggling with the burden of debts and underemployment, a growing number of graduates in the U.S. are moving back in with their parents. Meanwhile, unable to afford independent retirement, seniors are moving into their children's family homes. Census bureau statistics show a 4 percent rise from last year in the number of multi-generational households: 4.3 million U.S. households now include a parent, a grandparent and a child.</p><p>The video below highlights the strength of this trend; housing developers are designing houses under the premise that a young person or grandparent will be moving back in. Watch below (via NewsFix):</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=400&amp;height=255&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517521491'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/more_and_more_families_moving_in_together/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/more_and_more_families_moving_in_together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten filthy rich, tax-dodging hypocrites</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/ten_filthy_rich_tax_dodging_hypocrites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/ten_filthy_rich_tax_dodging_hypocrites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fix the Debt coalition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13054284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Fix the Debt" coalition pushes tax breaks for the rich and saddles the rest of us with the burden they created]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brace yourself for one of the most aggressive corporate lobbying campaigns of all time. And one of the most hypocritical.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p>“<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.fixthedebt.org/">Fix the Debt </a></span>” is a coalition of more than 80 CEOs who claim they know best how to deal with our nation’s fiscal challenges. The group boasts a <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.fixthedebt.org/uploads/files/CEO-Talking-Points-10.2.12.doc">$60 million </a></span> budget just for the initial phase of a massive media and lobbying campaign.</p><p>The irony is that CEOs in the coalition’s leadership have been major contributors to the national debt they now claim to know how to fix. These are guys who’ve mastered every tax-dodging trick in the book. And now that they’ve boosted their corporate profits by draining the public treasury, how do they propose we put our fiscal house back in order? By squeezing programs for the poor and elderly, including Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/ten_filthy_rich_tax_dodging_hypocrites/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/ten_filthy_rich_tax_dodging_hypocrites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why student loans are just like mortgages</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/why_student_loans_are_just_like_mortgages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/why_student_loans_are_just_like_mortgages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13054159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not just homeowners anymore. Big borrowing and zero oversight has left students drowning in debt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parallels between the mortgage market and the student loan industry have been frequently noted. Both involve big borrowing and have a <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/banks-lending-frenzy-left-borrowers-buried-in-student-debt-report-details">history of lax underwriting</a> by lenders. But the two are also strikingly similar in another way: When it comes to both mortgages and student debt, the servicers, or companies that handle loan payments, sometimes add roadblocks and give struggling borrowers the runaround.</p><div id="google-callout">That's the main takeaway from two <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/483469-cfpb-student-loan-ombudsman-annual-report#document/p15/a79078">recent</a> <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/483465-cfpb-report-on-servicemember-student-loan">reports</a> by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the independent agency created by the financial reform law passed in 2010.</div><p>Servicers have misapplied payments, given borrowers bad advice, and reported incorrect information to credit bureaus, according to one of the reports. The findings were based on the agency's recent tracking of student loan complaints, focusing on the companies who handle private student loans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/why_student_loans_are_just_like_mortgages/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/why_student_loans_are_just_like_mortgages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>