<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The real reason not to intervene in Syria</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne-Marie Slaughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only can outside interference in humanitarian emergencies not help -- it can actually make things worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demands by politicians and pundits for intervention in Syria have now become so strong that they now seem to be <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/01/world/middleeast/bomb-in-central-damascus.html?ref=middleeast">influencing U.S. policy</a>. But are they right? The most emotionally powerful arguments came from the State Department former policy planning head, Anne-Marie Slaughter. The Obama administration is in danger of letting genocide akin to the one in Rwanda in the 1990s occur, she wrote, in the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obama-should-remember-rwanda-as-he-weighs-action-in-syria/2013/04/26/08f77c20-ae8a-11e2-8bf6-e70cb6ae066e_story.html">Washington Post</a>. The case of Rwanda haunts Democrats. Former Secretary of State Madeline Albright called not saving Rwandans her “greatest regret” from her time in office, “something that sits very heavy on all our souls.” UN ambassador Susan Rice has similarly expressed agony over US failure to <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/11/29/rwandan_ghosts">intervene</a> in Rwanda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton is still the clear favorite in a potential Dem primary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll shows Clinton has a huge lead over other potential Democratic opponents]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1891">Quinnipiac University</a> finds that Hillary Clinton is still the clear favorite to win in a potential 2016 Democratic primary field. If she doesn't run, Biden is the frontrunner by a significant margin.</p><p>From the poll:</p><blockquote><p>Ms. Clinton would get 65 percent of Democratic votes compared to 13 percent for Vice President Joe Biden, 4 percent for New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, and 1 percent or less for Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds. If Clinton is not in the race, Biden would get 45 percent, with 15 percent for Gov. Cuomo, 6 percent for, Gov. Patrick, 3 percent O'Malley and 2 percent for Warner.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats hold edge in Massachusetts special election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/democrats_hold_edge_in_massachusetts_special_election_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/democrats_hold_edge_in_massachusetts_special_election_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are quietly conceding that Congressman Ed Markey is likely to fill John Kerry's senate seat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOSTON (AP) — National Republicans cheered former Navy SEAL Gabriel Gomez's Massachusetts primary victory, but Democratic Congressman Ed Markey enjoys tremendous advantages in the special election to replace former U.S. Sen. John Kerry.</p><p>Tuesday's primary elections set up an eight-week sprint to the June 25 election.</p><p>In Markey, the race pits a longtime liberal politician known for environmental advocacy against Gomez, a fresh-faced social moderate with a distinguished biography and untested political skills. On paper, it looks like a competitive contest, but Republicans quietly concede that Markey is the strong favorite in a state where only around 11 percent of voters are registered Republicans.</p><p>"As we've shown before in the state, anything can happen in a special election," said Republican strategist Ron Kaufman, Massachusetts' national committeeman.</p><p>Indeed, little-known Republican state Sen. Scott Brown stunned Democrats in his 2010 special election U.S. Senate victory in a contest that became a referendum on Obama's healthcare overhaul. So far, at least, this race has drawn little national interest, even before being overshadowed by the Boston Marathon bombings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/democrats_hold_edge_in_massachusetts_special_election_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/democrats_hold_edge_in_massachusetts_special_election_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthony Weiner is raking it in as a corporate consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/anthony_weiner_is_raking_it_in_as_a_corporate_consultant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/anthony_weiner_is_raking_it_in_as_a_corporate_consultant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayoral race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He and his wife made almost $500K last year, most of it from Weiner's new career]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since resigning from office, Anthony Weiner has found a lucrative career as a corporate consultant to more than a dozen companies, including a medical records provider called CureMD, and an international law firm, Covington &amp; Burling.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/30/nyregion/jobless-after-scandal-weiner-triumphs-in-corporate-world.html">New York Times</a>:</p><blockquote> <p data-chars="1860">He and his wife, <a href="http://nyti.ms/XCxYfU">Huma Abedin</a>, a longtime aide to Hillary Rodham Clinton, disclosed last week that they had a combined income of $496,000 in 2012, most of it from Mr. Weiner’s work. The money provided a lifestyle-changing infusion for the couple, who moved from a modest home in Forest Hills, Queens, to a large apartment on Park Avenue South in Manhattan.</p> <p data-chars="2006">Mr. Weiner’s rapid rise from disgraced lawmaker to in-demand strategic consultant demonstrates the enduring power of Washington’s revolving door.</p> </blockquote><p data-chars="2006">“I am a good capitalist," he told the Times.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/anthony_weiner_is_raking_it_in_as_a_corporate_consultant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/anthony_weiner_is_raking_it_in_as_a_corporate_consultant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colbert Busch goes there in debate with Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democratic candidate reminded her Republican counterpart he used taxpayer funds to finance his affair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) -- Republican Mark Sanford and Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch planned to hit the campaign trail a day after a spirited debate in their race for a vacant congressional seat along the South Carolina coast.</p><p>"I rocked it," Colbert Busch said following Monday's 75-minute debate before an audience of about 500 at The Citadel, which was telecast on C-SPAN. Sanford, a former two-term governor trying to revive a political career damaged by an extramarital affair, said he would let the pundits decide who won.</p><p>With Election Day just a week away, both have separate appearances Tuesday, then appear before a Charleston Metro Chamber of Commerce group on the city's waterfront before attending a forum sponsored by the Goose Creek NAACP. During both appearances, the candidates will address attendees but won't debate.</p><p>They did debate Monday, before a lively audience where supporters frequently broke into shouts or applause.</p><p>Early on, Colbert Busch, the sister of political satirist Stephen Colbert, reminded Sanford that he once used taxpayer funds to "leave the country for a personal purpose" - referring to the extramarital affair with an Argentine woman he had while governor. In general, Colbert Busch has refused to bring up Sanford's personal past during the campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuomo disputes report about not challenging Hillary in 2016</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/cuomo_disputes_report_about_not_challenging_hillary_in_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/cuomo_disputes_report_about_not_challenging_hillary_in_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The only discussions I’m having are about how to help the state," he said ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo disputed a New York Post <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/">report</a> that he decided he will not to run for president in 2016 if Hillary enters the race. “There is no truth to the assertion that I’m talking presidential politics and strategy and what Hillary Clinton should do or shouldn’t do or what I’m doing presidentially,” Cuomo told WCNY on Monday, the New York Observer's <a href="http://politicker.com/2013/04/cuomo-shoots-down-latest-report-on-his-presidential-ambitions/">Politicker</a> blog reports.</p><p>“The only discussions I’m having are about how to help the state, how to get the state running, how to make the government a better government,” he conitnued. “And to the extend I’m focusing on politics, it’s my race next year.”</p><p>“I understand the press appeal of presidential politics,” Cuomo added. “But no, I’m doing what I’m doing.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/cuomo_disputes_report_about_not_challenging_hillary_in_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/cuomo_disputes_report_about_not_challenging_hillary_in_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Cuomo won&#8217;t run if Hillary does</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Governor reportedly decided he has no chance in 2016 if Clinton runs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has reportedly decided not to run for president in 2016 if Hillary Clinton enters the race, according to the New York Post.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/if_hillary_is_running_for_prez_out_dkbcdkHXOK19hRsJYXL6fK">Post</a>:</p><blockquote><p>“The governor has told people in recent weeks that there’s not a chance for him to run if Hillary gets in the race because she’ll easily wrap up the Democratic nomination,’’ said a Cuomo administration insider with direct knowledge of the situation.</p> <p>“He knows that and he accepts that, and so he won’t even be thinking at all in those terms — unless Hillary decides not to run, which seems unlikely,’’ the source continued.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Census reveals historic black voter turnout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New data shows more African Americans voted in 2012 than any other ethnic group, and at a greater rate than whites]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — America's blacks voted at a higher rate than other minority groups in 2012 and by most measures surpassed the white turnout for the first time, reflecting a deeply polarized presidential election in which blacks strongly supported Barack Obama while many whites stayed home.</p><p>Had people voted last November at the same rates they did in 2004, when black turnout was below its current historic levels, Republican Mitt Romney would have won narrowly, according to an analysis conducted for The Associated Press.</p><p>Census data and exit polling show that whites and blacks will remain the two largest racial groups of eligible voters for the next decade. Last year's heavy black turnout came despite concerns about the effect of new voter-identification laws on minority voting, outweighed by the desire to re-elect the first black president.</p><p>William H. Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, analyzed the 2012 elections for the AP using census data on eligible voters and turnout, along with November's exit polling. He estimated total votes for Obama and Romney under a scenario where 2012 turnout rates for all racial groups matched those in 2004. Overall, 2012 voter turnout was roughly 58 percent, down from 62 percent in 2008 and 60 percent in 2004.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weiner &#8220;can&#8217;t say&#8221; whether there are more pictures out there</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/weiner_cant_say_if_there_are_more_pictures_out_there/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/weiner_cant_say_if_there_are_more_pictures_out_there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He added that there also could be another "person who may want to come out on their own"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., who resigned after accidentally tweeting a lewd photo of himself, says that he "can't say" if there are more pictures out there, or more women willing to come forward.</p><p>“If reporters want to go try to find more, I can’t say that they’re not going to be able to find another picture, or find another person who may want to come out on their own, but I’m not going to contribute to that. The basics of the story are not gonna change,” Weiner said, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFpUqJTz3w8&amp;feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">speaking to</a> RNN-TV’s Dominic Carter.</p><p>Weiner has recently been making the media rounds, possibly in the hopes of running for mayor of New York City this year. A recent <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/poll_weiner_trails_quinn_in_new_york_city_mayoral_race/" target="_blank">poll</a> put him in second place behind Christine Quinn in the primary, though trailing 26-15 percent, with 50 percent of Democrats saying they would not vote for him.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aFpUqJTz3w8" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/weiner_cant_say_if_there_are_more_pictures_out_there/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/weiner_cant_say_if_there_are_more_pictures_out_there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg PAC may target Dem who voted against background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayors against illegal guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Pryor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayors Against Illegal Guns is reportedly considering running an ad campaign against Sen. Mark Pryor ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Bloomberg's super PAC, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, is reportedly considering running an ad campaign against Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas, who was one of four Democrats to vote against the Senate's measure to tighten gun background check laws.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/mark-pryor-may-soon-have-a-bloomberg-problem-20130423">National Journal</a> cites an anonymous senior official in the group, who said senior members of the super PAC met to discuss possible responses to the failure of gun control legislation:</p><blockquote><p>The Bloomberg group is mulling a variety of messages and methods for Arkansas. One approach would be to target reliable Democratic voters, including African Americans, with advertising that calls out Pryor for “opposing the president’s agenda,” the official said. Another would be to expand the campaign to suburban women and other moderates. The campaign might not be limited to the issue of guns.</p> <p>“Money would not be an object,” the official said, adding that a decision on whether to target Pryor would come soon and that action against other Democrats is still possible.</p></blockquote><p>Pryor is one of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mark_pryor_i_still_oppose_gay_marriage/">more vulnerable</a> Democrats up for reelection in 2014.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid: There may be a &#8220;path forward&#8221; on background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/reid_there_may_be_a_path_forward_on_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/reid_there_may_be_a_path_forward_on_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We're going to do our best to get something just as soon as we can," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., implied that Senate Democrats may have a way forward on gun background checks, following the measure's defeat last week at the hands of a Republican filibuster. "We are working on a path forward," Reid told reporters, according to <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/reid-dems-may-have-path-forward-on-gun">TPM</a>. "I think we have one, but we're not ready to move on that at this time."</p><p>He added: "We're going to do our best to get something just as soon as we can. It's really an issue that I feel very strongly about and the American people do also."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/reid_there_may_be_a_path_forward_on_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/reid_there_may_be_a_path_forward_on_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration: The latest watered-down compromise GOP hates anyway</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undocumented immigrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New proposal will do little to fix our broken system, and passing it will cost Obama real capital. Sound familiar?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The road to citizenship isn’t exactly shovel ready. In fact, even calling it a road might be a stretch. It’s more like a long on-ramp. With a tollbooth. And potholes. And a guard station. And a giant electrified fence.</p><p>In their desire to find a compromise acceptable to the chronically short-sighted and self-destructive Republican Party, Democrats have crafted an immigration bill that is for the most part as unobjectionable as it is uninspired. The bill cobbles together a series of pragmatic concessions that, while perhaps sufficient to overcome conservative objections, will likely prove wholly insufficient at actually addressing the problem it was designed to solve — that is, fixing our broken immigration system. The tangle of hurdles and exclusions, loopholes for businesses and pitfalls for immigrants, is precisely the mess we should be cleaning up, not making worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas AG: Democrats more dangerous than North Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/texas_ag_democrats_more_dangerous_than_north_korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/texas_ag_democrats_more_dangerous_than_north_korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Obama administration and his political machine" is "more dangerous" than North Korea, Greg Abbott said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Abbott, the Republican Attorney General of Texas, thinks that his state has bigger things to worry about than North Korea. Namely, President Obama.</p><p>Abbott was referring to reports that North Korea had <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/03/rick-perry-north-korea_n_3010977.html">included</a> Austin, Texas on its list of potential targets in the United States. But, Abbott told the <a href="http://www.wacotrib.com/news/politics/in-waco-abbott-sounds-alarm-on-u-n-arms-treaty/article_f2a0bf70-8f9e-5a30-92c8-81f4084af9e0.html">Waco Tribune-Herald</a>, the state has more “far more dangerous” problems, in the form of the federal government.</p><p>“One thing that requires ongoing vigilance is the reality that the state of Texas is coming under a new  assault, an assault far more dangerous than what the leader of North Korea threatened when he said he was going to add Austin, Texas, as one of the recipients of his nuclear weapons,” Abbott said. “The threat that we’re getting is the threat from the Obama administration and his political machine.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/texas_ag_democrats_more_dangerous_than_north_korea/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/texas_ag_democrats_more_dangerous_than_north_korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weiner continues his post-scandal media tour</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/weiner_continues_his_post_scandal_media_tour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/weiner_continues_his_post_scandal_media_tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayoral race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Congressman is cagey about the infamous tweets, and about a possible mayoral run]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his first TV interview since his scandal broke, Anthony Weiner continued to cautiously edge toward a possible mayoral run, telling NY1's Errol Louis: "I want to be part of the ideas primary. That's for sure. That primary I want to do very well in."</p><p>"If I run for mayor and if I become the mayor, I want people looking at me and saying, 'You know what, you are in charge, you did this. You are accountable,'" Weiner said.</p><p>Louis also had to push Weiner to answer questions about the lewd photos he tweeted out, asking him how many people received the messages. From <a href="http://www.ny1.com/content/politics/political_news/180470/ny1-exclusive--former-rep--weiner-looks-back-at-twitter-sex-scandal-as-he-weighs-mayoral-run">NY1's transcript</a> of the exchange:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/weiner_continues_his_post_scandal_media_tour/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/weiner_continues_his_post_scandal_media_tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s entitlement plan was four years in the making</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutting social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President’s desire to cut Social Security was public before he even took office. Why did so many turn a blind eye?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many Democrats are expressing shock and outrage that President Obama, a Democrat, would propose to cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the truth is they shouldn’t be surprised. Obama’s desire to make these cuts dates back at least four years – since before his presidency, even -- and has been largely in plain view. We just chose to willfully ignore it, and pretend it wasn’t true.</p><p>Obama didn’t talk about it when he first campaigned for the job -- if he had, he surely wouldn’t have won the Democratic nomination, and may not even have beaten John McCain, since not even Republican presidential candidates publicly campaign to weaken what their party calls “entitlements.” Everyone sensibly had assumed that no Democrat would want to weaken or reduce the crowning achievements of Democratic Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson, not to mention of the Democratic Party itself. But immediately after getting elected, Barack Obama admitted he wanted to do just that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthony Weiner is mulling a run for mayor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/anthony_weiner_is_mulling_a_run_for_mayor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/anthony_weiner_is_mulling_a_run_for_mayor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It's now or maybe never for me," the former congressman says in a new profile]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/14/magazine/anthony-weiner-and-huma-abedins-post-scandal-playbook.html?pagewanted=1">New York Times Magazine</a> has a big profile out Wednesday of former Rep. Anthony Weiner and his wife, Hillary Clinton's deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin, in which Weiner says he is considering a political comeback, possibly as soon as this year for New York City's mayoral race.</p><p>Weiner, who resigned from the House in 2011 after he accidentally tweeted a lewd picture of himself and then lied to the press about it, told the Times that he has spent $100,000 in polling and research for a possible run in 2013. “I don’t have this burning, overriding desire to go out and run for office,” he said. “It’s not the single animating force in my life as it was for quite some time. But I do recognize, to some degree, it’s now or maybe never for me, in terms of running for something."</p><p>“Also, I want to ask people to give me a second chance," he continued. "I do want to have that conversation with people whom I let down and with people who put their faith in me and who wanted to support me. I think to some degree I do want to say to them, ‘Give me another chance.’”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/anthony_weiner_is_mulling_a_run_for_mayor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/anthony_weiner_is_mulling_a_run_for_mayor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s forgotten agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obamas_forgotten_agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obamas_forgotten_agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the union 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He talked about urgent action on minimum wage and climate at the start of this term. A few months later: Nada]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two months ago this week, an emboldened President Obama laid out an ambitious agenda for a second term in his State of the Union address. Congress and the media have been consumed by important debates over a small array of those issues like gun control, immigration reform and the budget (which he'll unveil today). But other items critical to the progressive agenda of his second term -- especially raising the minimum wage and addressing climate change -- have largely fallen out of view.</p><p>And while it's still just a few months in, a look at these important but overshadowed goals, as he outlines his budget, does not suggest much progress -- or urgency.</p><p>“I urge this Congress to get together, pursue a bipartisan, market-based solution to climate change, like the one John McCain and Joe Lieberman worked on together a few years ago,” Obama thundered in the February speech, in an aggressive plea to address the crisis. “But if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obamas_forgotten_agenda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/obamas_forgotten_agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christie&#8217;s Dem challenger hits him on gay rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christies_dem_challenger_hits_him_on_gay_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christies_dem_challenger_hits_him_on_gay_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Buono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barbara Buono has struggled to gain momentum in the face of Christie's overwhelming popularity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrat Barbara Buono has found one way to possibly cut into New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's reelection prospects: hit him on gay rights.</p><p>Buono, a state senator, has had a tough time gaining any momentum in the race, with Christie enjoying overwhelming popularity that has sustained since Hurricane Sandy. But gay rights pose a tricky problem for the Republican governor. For example, Christie had to scramble to clarify his opposition to gay conversion therapy after commenting that “I’m of two minds just on this stuff in general." Buono called the remark "disgusting," while the DGA fundraised off of it.</p><p>From the <a href="http://blog.nj.com/njv_auditor/2013/04/early_on_in_the_campaign_buono.html">Star-Ledger</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christies_dem_challenger_hits_him_on_gay_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christies_dem_challenger_hits_him_on_gay_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Democrats destroy the planet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their inability to take a firm stance on issues like the Keystone XL pipeline helps enable global warming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, <em>Time</em> magazine <a href="http://swampland.time.com/2013/02/28/im-with-the-tree-huggers/" target="_blank">called</a> the fight over the Keystone XL pipeline that will bring some of the dirtiest energy on the planet from Alberta, Canada, to the U.S. Gulf Coast the “Selma and Stonewall” of the climate movement.</p><p>Which, if you think about it, may be both good news and bad news. Yes, those of us fighting the pipeline have mobilized record numbers of activists: the largest civil disobedience action <a href="http://action.sierraclub.org/site/PageServer?pagename=forwardonclimate" target="_blank">in 30 years</a> and 40,000 people on the mall in February for the biggest climate rally in American history. Right now, we’re aiming to get <a href="http://act.350.org/letter/a_million_strong_against_keystone/" target="_blank">a million people to send in public comments</a> about the “environmental review” the State Department is conducting on the feasibility and advisability of building the pipeline.  And there’s good reason to put pressure on.  After all, it’s the same State Department that, as on a previous round of reviews, <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/keystone-xl-contractor-ties-transcanada-state-department" target="_blank">hired</a> “experts” who had once worked as consultants for TransCanada, the pipeline’s builder.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How conservatives still run America, despite losing elections</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_conservatives_still_run_america_despite_losing_elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_conservatives_still_run_america_despite_losing_elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutting social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From guns to Social Security to FISA, the real majority party prevails while liberals lose out again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is more than may appear in President Obama’s plan to cut the social safety net in his <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-budget-chained-cpi-2013-4">new budget proposal</a>. The offer, on the face of it, reflects a significant violation of a major liberal creed, discarding the strongest liberal political card and Obama’s peculiar negotiation style of making major concessions at the opening of a give-and-take session. But it also reflects the sad but true fact that the dynamics of American politics cannot be understood in terms of Democrats vs. Republicans. Party labels aside, the nation is still being ruled by what I call a majority “conservative party.”</p><p>If Democrats and Republicans were the true divide, the meager gun control measures recently introduced in the Senate would have the majority needed to pass. After all, there are 53 Democratic Senators (and two Independents who generally side with them). Moreover, this time, the threat of a GOP filibuster is not to blame. Yet the Democratic majority leader, Senator Harry Reid, removed the assault weapons ban from the draft bill because some 15 Democratic senators, in effect, supported the conservative pro-gun position, making up — with the Republican senators — that majority “conservative party.” Thanks to this party, the same legislative defeat is about to befall liberal proposals to curtail high-capacity magazines. This leaves only better background checks on the table, but these, too, will inevitably be rendered ineffective by the conservatives via the underhanded gutting of enforcement (more about this shortly).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_conservatives_still_run_america_despite_losing_elections/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_conservatives_still_run_america_despite_losing_elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>