<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Dianne Feinstein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/dianne_feinstein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Zero Dark Thirty&#8221; debate isn&#8217;t really about torture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/the_zero_dark_thirty_debate_isnt_really_about_torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/the_zero_dark_thirty_debate_isnt_really_about_torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reducing "Zero Dark Thirty" to a partisan argument about torture misses the big questions it raises about America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art can be created with moralistic intentions, but it is inherently a ruthless and amoral endeavor, whose meaning always gets away from its creator. It can certainly be used to soothe the savage breast, lend succor in an hour of darkness, and so on. But let’s not forget that children in the death camps were made to play Schubert by murderers and torturers who believed themselves to be civilized and cultured men. That thread of civilization and culture is what saves teenage genius Wladyslaw Szpilman’s life in Roman Polanski’s <a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/27/pianist/">“The Pianist”</a> – but the ironic question posed by that film is whether that’s a good reason for one man to live while millions of others died. Because he could play the piano?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/the_zero_dark_thirty_debate_isnt_really_about_torture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/the_zero_dark_thirty_debate_isnt_really_about_torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Dems to propose large-capacity gun magazine ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/house_dems_to_propose_large_capacity_magazine_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/house_dems_to_propose_large_capacity_magazine_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assault weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolyn McCarthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would not include equipment that is already legally owned]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congressional Democrats will reintroduce a bill banning large-capacity gun magazines on Jan. 3, the first day of the new Congressional session, the Huffington Post <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/28/high-capacity-magazines-bill_n_2376838.html?1356722014">reports</a>. The bill will "mirror" the failed Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act that was proposed in January 2011, but has more support from Democrats in the wake of the Newtown massacre.</p><p>The last bill would have prohibited any "magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition" except for any "attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition." Large-capacity magazines were used in the Aurora and Newtown massacres.</p><p>Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has also promised to introduce an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/">assault weapons ban</a> when the new Congress convenes. That bill is modeled on the federal ban, which expired in 2004. Both new bills would not outlaw the possession of banned equipment that is already in circulation. Senator Feinstein has cited a Department of Justice study that the ban reduced gun deaths by 6.7 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/house_dems_to_propose_large_capacity_magazine_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/house_dems_to_propose_large_capacity_magazine_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feinstein defends domestic surveillance program</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/feinstein_defends_domestic_surveillance_program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/feinstein_defends_domestic_surveillance_program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-Ore.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite concerns by fellow Democrats and civil libertarians, the senator says there's ample oversight on spying]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/274689-feinstein-defends-foreign-surveillance-program-amid-criticism">wanted</a> the answer to a basic question on Thursday: How many Americans does the United States government currently spy on?</p><p>The question arose ahead of a vote over reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a 1978 law permitting the government to spy on correspondence between Americans and foreign individuals. Wyden, leading the charge to challenge the reauthorization, argues that the "Senate cannot say that we passed the smell test with respect to vigorous oversight if we don't have some sense of how many Americans … are being swept up under the legislation."</p><p>A number of FISA provisions passed in recent years are set to expire at the end of this year, and as Politico <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/clock-running-out-for-surveillance-law-powers-85144_Page3.html">reported,</a> "[Wyden] has placed a hold on the bill as he seeks information from the federal authorities, who have told Wyden in the past that they can’t deliver that data [on how many Americans are caught up in the surveillance dragnet]. And Wyden said this week that he’ll maintain that hold unless the Senate allows a vote on his amendments to introduce new legal checks and transparency rules to the law."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/feinstein_defends_domestic_surveillance_program/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/feinstein_defends_domestic_surveillance_program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers look to restrict gun magazine capacity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/lawmakers_look_to_restrict_gun_magazine_capacity_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/lawmakers_look_to_restrict_gun_magazine_capacity_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault weapons ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Members of both parties say they are open to discussing an assault weapons ban]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers from both parties voiced their willingness Sunday to pursue some changes to the nation's gun laws, but adamant opposition from the National Rifle Association has made clear than any such effort will face significant obstacles.</p><p>NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre dismissed efforts to revive a ban on assault weapons as a "phony piece of legislation" that's built on lies.</p><p>Democratic lawmakers in Congress have become more adamant about the need for stricter gun laws since the shooting of 20 children and six teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California is promising to push for a renewal of expired legislation that banned certain weapons and limited the number of bullets a gun magazine could hold to 10.</p><p>"I think we ought to be looking at where the real danger is, like those large clips," said Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas.</p><p>"I think we need a comprehensive approach," said Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., a longtime gun rights supporter. "I'll look at all the proposals. . I think it looks at mental health, I think it looks at protecting our schools but I also think it looks at these high-volume magazines, you know, that can fire off so many rounds."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/lawmakers_look_to_restrict_gun_magazine_capacity_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/lawmakers_look_to_restrict_gun_magazine_capacity_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Economist makes the gun debate look absurd</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British publication says only drastic change in the law would make a difference]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Dianne Feinstein has an <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/273989-feinstein-doesnt-have-concealed-carry-permit-anymore">F rating</a> from the NRA. It makes you wonder what the NRA would rate a politician who proposed an assault weapons bill that doesn’t <a href="http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=28d0c499-28ec-42a7-902d-ebf318d46d02">protect gun owners</a> by “exempting more than 900 specific hunting and sporting weapons.” For a rough comparison, try to imagine if staunchly pro-life Senators favored federally financed abortions on demand during the first trimester of pregnancy.</p><p>Feinstein has not released all of her proposed bill’s specifics but in her short, remarkable press release it appears closely modeled on the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/is_this_an_assault_weapon/">federal assault weapons ban</a> that was in effect from 1994 until 2004. Feinstein finds “A Justice Department study found the Assault Weapons Ban was responsible for a 6.7 percent decline in total gun murders. However, since the 2004 expiration of the bill, assault weapons have been used in at least 459 incidents, resulting in 385 deaths and 455 injuries.” In other words, after a national trauma that supposedly changed the debate, an anti-gun Senator can only argue for a bill that might reduce gun murders by 6.7 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Zero Dark Thirty&#8221; is indefensible</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/zero_dark_thirty_is_indefensible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/zero_dark_thirty_is_indefensible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark boal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a director, I respect "Zero Dark Thirty's" artistry. But its underlying message is wrong -- and dangerously so]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> It's difficult for one filmmaker to criticize another. That's a job best left to critics. However, in the case of Zero Dark Thirty, about the hunt for Osama bin Laden, an issue that is central to the film -- torture -- is so important that I feel I must say something. Mark Boal and Kathryn Bigelow have been irresponsible and inaccurate in the way they have treated this issue in their film. I am not alone in that view. Senators Carl Levin, Dianne Feinstein and John McCain wrote a letter to Michael Lynton, the Chairman of Sony Pictures, accusing the studio of misrepresenting the facts and "perpetuating the myth that torture is effective," and asking for the studio to correct the false impression created by the film. The film conveys the unmistakable conclusion that torture led to the death of bin Laden. That's wrong and dangerously so, precisely because the film is so well made.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/zero_dark_thirty_is_indefensible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/zero_dark_thirty_is_indefensible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain, Dems slam &#8220;misleading&#8221; torture depiction in &#8220;Zero Dark Thirty&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/mccain_dems_slam_misleading_torture_depiction_in_zero_dark_thirty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/mccain_dems_slam_misleading_torture_depiction_in_zero_dark_thirty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carl levin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The implication that torture helped lead to bin Laden's death is “factually inaccurate,” three Senators say]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal’s “Zero Dark Thirty,” the film that depicts the CIA’s decade-long manhunt for Osama bin Laden, has been under fire for its torture scenes; many critics have gone so far as to say that the film <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/10/zero-dark-thirty-torture-awards">“glorifies”</a> torture by suggesting that information gained in the waterboarding scene led to the capture of bin Laden. Now, Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Carl Levin, D-Mich., have written a <a href="http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve/?File_id=abcf714a-38fa-4c49-8abe-e06eed51e364">letter</a>  to Michael Lynton, the chairman and chief executive of Sony Pictures Entertainment, calling the depiction of torture "misleading" and "factually inaccurate."</p><p>"We write to express our deep disappointment with the movie 'Zero Dark Thirty,'" the Senators wrote. "We believe the film is grossly inaccurate and misleading in its suggestion that torture resulted in information that led to the location of Usama bin Laden."</p><p>They continued:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/mccain_dems_slam_misleading_torture_depiction_in_zero_dark_thirty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/mccain_dems_slam_misleading_torture_depiction_in_zero_dark_thirty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama will back Feinstein&#8217;s bill to reinstate assault weapons ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/obama_will_back_feinsteins_bill_to_reinstate_assault_weapons_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/obama_will_back_feinsteins_bill_to_reinstate_assault_weapons_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault weapons ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre, the president offers his support for Sen. Dianne Feinstein's new bill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White House Press Secretary Jay Carney <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/obama-assault-weapons-ban_n_2323764.html">said Tuesday</a> that the president is "actively supportive" of Sen. Dianne Feinstein's planned bill to reinstate a ban on assault weapons.</p><p>Carney was speaking in a White House press briefing, and said that the president will support a push by Feinstein, D-Calif., for the ban, which she said she will introduce in the new session of Congress. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/18/us-usa-shooting-connecticut-obama-idUSBRE8BH10W20121218">Reuters</a> reports that Carney also said that Obama would support closing gun-show sale "loopholes," if any such legislation was introduced.</p><p>"It's clear that as a nation we haven't done enough to address the scourge of gun violence," Carney said. He added that Obama "wants to move in the coming weeks."</p><p>Meanwhile, several other lawmakers have expressed a new openness to reviewing the nation's gun laws. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/another_nra_backed_dem_comes_out_for_gun_control/singleton/">Following</a> Joe Manchin and Mark Warner, several other NRA-backed lawmakers said that it is time to reconsider gun policy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/obama_will_back_feinsteins_bill_to_reinstate_assault_weapons_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/obama_will_back_feinsteins_bill_to_reinstate_assault_weapons_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is an assault weapon?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/is_this_an_assault_weapon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/is_this_an_assault_weapon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assault weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault weapons ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brady campaign to prevent gun violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick primer on some of America's favorite guns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking on “Meet the Press” Sunday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said she would introduce an assault weapons ban on the first day of the new congressional session. The last federal assault weapons ban, which was in force from 1994 to 2004, motivated gun rights activists and arguably did little to prevent gun violence. Is it possible to write (let alone pass) a more effective law? To answer that it's first essential to understand what was wrong with the last one.</p><p>The law <a href="http://www.bradycenter.org/xshare/pdf/reports/on_target.pdf">banned</a> manufacturing, transferring and possessing "semi-automatic assault rifles.” It listed “several guns by name AK-47, Uzi, Colt AR-15, and Street Sweeper, as well as copies or duplicates of these named firearms in any caliber,” according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. It also banned magazines with more than 10 round capacity. Due to a grandfather clause, however, it did not touch banned guns and accessories that were already in circulation. As a result, the Brady Campaign wrote in 2004 that gunmaker Bushmaster "apparently stockpiled enough 'pre-ban' magazines that it still markets 40 round ammunition magazines as available for sale to the general public for only $24.95." (Bushmaster still <a href="http://www.bushmaster.com/products.asp?cat=9">does</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/is_this_an_assault_weapon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/is_this_an_assault_weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Democrats won on guns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/when_democrats_won_on_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/when_democrats_won_on_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault weapons ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13146754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gun control advocates want to replicate their biggest ever victory over the NRA. Will the president lead the fight?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who has been at forefront of the debate over gun access for two decades, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/16/dianne-feinstein-assault-weapons-ban_n_2311477.html">said on Sunday</a> that she’ll introduce legislation to revive the federal assault weapons ban when the new Congress convenes in January. She also said that she expects President Obama, who vowed at Sunday night's memorial service in Newtown, Connecticut to "“use whatever power this office holds” to prevent future tragedies, to join the fight. But even though there are hints that the political climate on guns really is shifting, the odds of Feinstein's bill becoming law still aren’t that good.</p><p>To understand what Feinstein and other gun control advocates are up against, it’s worth recapping the history of the assault weapons ban, which was first enacted in 1994 and expired without congressional action in 2004. Since then, there has been intermittent talk of trying to bring it back, generally in the wake of mass shootings like the one in Connecticut last Friday. But in the eight years since it lapsed, neither the House nor the Senate has ever voted on restoring the ban, and even though President Obama says he supports doing so, he’s not made it a legislative priority.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/when_democrats_won_on_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/when_democrats_won_on_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show roundup: Gun defenders mum</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/sunday_show_round_up_guns_defenders_mum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/sunday_show_round_up_guns_defenders_mum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louie Gohmert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13146632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the Newtown massacre, gun control advocates, including Michael Bloomberg, spoke with few opponents]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Gregory, host of NBC's "Meet the Press," told viewers Sunday morning that not a single pro-gun rights senator accepted an invitation to appear on the show following the mass shooting at a Connecticut elementary school on Friday.</p><p>"A note here this morning: We reached out to all 31 pro-gun rights senators in the new Congress to invite them on the program to share their views on the subject this morning," he said. "We had no takers."</p><p>Since Adam Lanza shot 20 children and 6 adults dead with a semiautomatic, few defenders of gun rights have spoken publicly as cries for greater gun control have amplified. On Sunday, Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, was the lone pro-gun voice to grace the talk show circuit. He said on "Fox News Sunday" that Sandy Hook principal Dawn Hochsprung should have been armed:</p><p>"I wish to god she had had an m-4 in her office, locked up so when she heard gunfire, she pulls it out ... and takes him out and takes his head off before he can kill those precious kids," Gohmert said.</p><p>Watch Gohmert's comments, via Fox News:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8OmqokZxkqs" frameborder="0" width="420" height="315"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/sunday_show_round_up_guns_defenders_mum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/sunday_show_round_up_guns_defenders_mum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feinstein to introduce assault weapons ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/feinstein_to_introduce_assault_weapons_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/feinstein_to_introduce_assault_weapons_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault weapons ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13146599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the first day of the new Congress, the California Democrat will introduce the bill in the Senate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Sunday that she plans to introduce an assault weapons ban bill on the first day of the new Congress.</p><p>Following the horrifying murder of 20 children and six adults at a Connecticut elementary school, the debate over gun control has reached fever pitch. Following the mass shooting in July at a Colorado movie theater, Feinstein also called for the ban on assault weapons to be renewed (it was introduced by Bill Clinton in 1994 but has since expired). Feinstein noted that she and her colleagues had been working on the bill for a year, not only in the wake of the Newtown massacre.</p><p>Feinstein's new bill will  "ban the sale, the transfer, the importation and the possession [of assault weapons], not retroactively, but prospectively, And it will ban the same for big clips, drums or strips of more than 10 bullets. So there will be a bill," she said Sunday.</p><p>[<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/16/dianne-feinstein-assault-weapons-ban_n_2311477.html">h/t Huffpo</a>]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/feinstein_to_introduce_assault_weapons_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/feinstein_to_introduce_assault_weapons_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate-approved CIA torture report kept under wraps</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enhanced interrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 6,000-page investigation challenges the efficacy of enhanced interrogation during the war on terror]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence voted Thursday to approve a 6,000-page report on the use of torture and extraordinary rendition by the CIA, the investigation will for now remain classified. According to<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/13/senate-pressure-cia-interrogation-torture"> the Guardian</a>, Republican senators could push for the extensive report to stay under wraps, despite pressure from human rights advocates to make the information public.</p><p>"I believe it to be one of the most significant oversight efforts in the history of the United States Senate," said chair of the intelligence committee Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.  She noted that the report is "a comprehensive review of the CIA’s detention program that includes details of each detainee in CIA custody, the conditions under which they were detained, how they were interrogated, the intelligence they actually provided and the accuracy — or inaccuracy — of CIA descriptions about the program to the White House, Department of Justice, Congress and others."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate votes down indefinite detention of Americans &#8212; or does it?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/senate_votes_down_indefinite_detention_of_americans_or_does_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/senate_votes_down_indefinite_detention_of_americans_or_does_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indefinite Detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hedges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest draft of the NDAA remains problematic and may not even protect citizens from military detention]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate on Thursday voted in favor of a narrow amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act in the hope of ensuring an end to the indefinite detention of Americans. The newest draft of the 2013 act now includes provisions that aim to protect citizens inside the U.S. from military imprisonment, thanks to an amendment introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.</p><p>Within hours of the amendment's approval, civil liberties advocates pointed out significant problems that remain in the NDAA, while lawyers noted that the amendment may even fail to achieve its intended purpose regarding the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens and permanent residents. Under the 2012 act, any person suspected of terrorism or substantial support for terrorism in the U.S.could be held without trial indefinitely. To ensure the writ of habeas corpus, the newest draft includes the following:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/senate_votes_down_indefinite_detention_of_americans_or_does_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/senate_votes_down_indefinite_detention_of_americans_or_does_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show round up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/sunday_show_round_up_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/sunday_show_round_up_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R-Ga.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saxby Chambliss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Rogers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff debate, more Benghazi politicking and questions over when Obama learned of Petraeus affair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Congress investigates what the Obama administration knew, and when, about the Benghazi consulate attacks, the topic once again took up considerable Sunday show focus.</p><p><strong>Benghazi:</strong></p><p>Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), the top Republican in the Senate Intelligence Committee, told "Fox News Sunday" that he expects Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, will testify before the Senate about the Benghazi attacks. "At some point [Rice] needs to come in and say what the president or the White House directed her to say," Chambliss said.</p><p><span>On NBC's "Meet the Press," host David Gregory also pushed chair of the Senate's Select Committee on Intelligence, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), </span>on whether the White House and Rice had misled the public in saying early on that the attacks were spontaneous protests, while intelligence pointed to a terrorist plot.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/sunday_show_round_up_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/sunday_show_round_up_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feinstein: Petraeus to testify on Benghazi attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/feinstein_petraeus_to_testify_on_benghazi_attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/feinstein_petraeus_to_testify_on_benghazi_attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/feinstein_petraeus_to_testify_on_benghazi_attacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The head of the Senate Intelligence Committee says Petraeus has agreed to testify before Congress]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The head of the Senate Intelligence Committee says former CIA Director David Petraeus has agreed to testify to Congress about the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.</p><p>Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said Wednesday that Petraeus, who resigned from the CIA post on Friday because of an extra-marital affair, indicated his willingness to testify. No date for his testimony has been set.</p><p>She said his testimony to her committee will be limited to the Benghazi attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others. No date for his testimony has been set. Petraeus was CIA director at the time.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517536333'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/feinstein_petraeus_to_testify_on_benghazi_attacks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/feinstein_petraeus_to_testify_on_benghazi_attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI &#8220;stumbled&#8221; across Petraeus affair</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/fbi_stumbled_across_petraeus_affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/fbi_stumbled_across_petraeus_affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest on the CIA Director's resignation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula Broadwell, David Petraeus’s biographer, inadvertently tipped off the FBI to her affair with David Petraeus after she sent "harassing" emails to another woman, according to FBI officials.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/us/fbi-said-to-have-stumbled-into-news-of-david-petraeus-affair.html?pagewanted=all">New York Times</a> reports that the FBI came across information about the affair after the woman, who knows Petraeus and Broadwell, complained:</p><blockquote><p>"When F.B.I. agents following up on the complaint began to examine Ms. Broadwell’s e-mails, they discovered exchanges between her and Mr. Petraeus that revealed that they were having an affair, said several officials who spoke of the investigation on the condition of anonymity. They also discovered that Ms. Broadwell possessed certain classified information, one official said, but apparently concluded that it was probably not Mr. Petraeus who had given it to her and that there had been no major breach of security. No leak charges are expected to be filed as a result of the investigation."</p></blockquote><p>A Congressional official who was briefed on the affair told the Times that the FBI said the investigation  “started with two women," but “it didn't start with Petraeus, but in the course of the investigation they stumbled across him."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/fbi_stumbled_across_petraeus_affair/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/fbi_stumbled_across_petraeus_affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>