<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Dick Morris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/dick_morris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday link dump: I can hear Chuck Grassley&#8217;s &#8220;no&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/tuesday_link_dump_24/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/tuesday_link_dump_24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/16/tuesday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP splits over gay group, Dick Morris lies, and the shocking truth about bipartisan compromise and healthcare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>John Yoo <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=11&amp;year=2010&amp;base_name=getting_to_know_yoo">wrote something stupid today.</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/253371/iwall-street-journali-needs-anti-krugman-alexander-benard">Some schmo at The Corner</a>: "We dislike him, we ridicule him, and we tend to dismiss him, but here&#8217;s the sad truth: Paul Krugman&#8217;s influence is vast, and conservatives have no effective counterpoise." Ha ha ha <em>the entire rest of the economics/finance media is the anti-Krugman.</em></li>
<li>Chuck Grassley <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/11/in_testy_exchange_chuck_grassl.html?wprss=plum-line">basically told Obama that he wouldn't be able to vote for healthcare reform because no other Republicans would've voted for it.</a></li>
<li>GOProud, the gay GOP group, will participate in next year's CPAC, so some other conservative group <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1110/CPAC_under_fire_over_gay_conservative_group.html">has backed out.</a></li>
<li>Dick Morris <a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/magazine/79059/hack-dick-morris-tea-party?passthru=NjAzZTQ4ZDBjNTQ0ODRhZTM2ZjMwZTIwMmFhZTgzMDk">is really good at taking money from stupid people</a>, and lying.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/tuesday_link_dump_24/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/tuesday_link_dump_24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fred Barnes not on a team? Why did GOP pay him?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Weekly Standard editor claimed political purity in bashing Journolist, but he's on the Republican payroll]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the pages of the Wall Street Journal, Fred Barnes <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487046846045753883191313448.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">has lately lamented</a> the betrayal of "traditional journalism" by the liberal denizens of Journolist -- the defunct listserv that conservatives have used to revive the debate over "liberal media bias." His widely quoted Journal Op-Ed noted that before Journolist, neither liberal nor conservative journalists were likely to be "part of a team," and went on to add:</p><blockquote>
<p>"If there's a team, no one has asked me to join. As a conservative, I normally write more favorably about Republicans than Democrats and I routinely treat conservative ideas as superior to liberal ones. But I've never been part of a discussion with conservative writers about how we could most help the Republican or the conservative team."</p>
</blockquote><p>This assertion of political purity struck me as false, coming from a journalist who has <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201004210012">appeared repeatedly</a> as a speaker at Republican Party events across the country -- a breach of the political boundaries of "traditional journalism" that few, if any, of the writers on Journolist, for example, would ever contemplate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do Republicans (pretend to) hate the Upper West Side?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/upperwest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/upperwest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/06/29/upperwest</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Growing up on Manhattan's West Side is un-American -- unless you happen to be named Kristol or Podhoretz]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As they attempt to disparage Elena Kagan, the most aggressive Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee are proving that Supreme Court nomination hearings can produce something worse than vapidity: in this instance, gross hypocrisy and barely veiled appeals to bigotry. Whatever the merits or deficits of Kagan may be (and Salon readers know that there are skeptics on the left as well), the quality of the partisan assault so far seems very low, even by the usual standards of this process.</p><p>Consider the discussion of her personal background on the first day of the hearings, when Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl directed our attention to the New York City neighborhood where bright young Elena grew up. Quoting a profile from Politico that described her life experience as "distant from most Americans," Kyl noted portentously that she was raised on "Manhattan's Upper West Side" before attending Princeton and Harvard Law School, where she eventually served as dean.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/upperwest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/upperwest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Morris: When he predicts doom, expect sunshine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/morris_15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/morris_15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/03/18/morris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox News political guru warns that healthcare reform will "eradicate" Democrats -- which may mean there's hope]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the many media prophets of gloom and Democratic doom, nobody can quite match the fury of Dick Morris, Fox News star, Newsmax guru and chief political strategist for a shady outfit called the League of American Voters. Just today I received an "urgent message" from him, touting the dire consequences to ensue from passage of healthcare reform -- including an electoral massacre of the Democrats come November.</p><p>According to him, voter revulsion "will be enough to eradicate an entire generation of House and Senate Democrats ... This is the prospect the House and Senate Democrats who vote for Obamacare will face in the fall of 2010. This is the record they will have to defend. Or, they could save their political lives and vote no!"</p><p>Such hysterics must be expected from every carnival barker in Fox Nation, especially a featured player like Morris &#8211; and the shrill rhetoric surely helps to separate the rubes from their money, in this case through <a href="https://www.newsmaxstore.com/contribute/lav/?s=al&amp;promo_code=99B7-1">donations to the League of American Voters</a>, sponsor of this morning&#8217;s e-mail and many more from him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/morris_15/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/morris_15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congratulations, President Romney!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/03/morris_romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/03/morris_romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/03/morris_romney</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good sign for the Republican hopeful: Dick Morris is writing him off]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've got good news and bad news for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. Bad news first: Dick Morris says Romney's got no shot to capture the Republican presidential nomination in 2012.</p><p>"Romney, I think, is virtually out of this race because he proposed healthcare reform in Massachusetts very similar to Obama's. It passed, and it's a disaster in Massachusetts now," Morris said in <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/morris_huckabee_2012/2009/12/01/292889.html">a recent interview.</a> (Hat-tip to <a href="http://www.gop12.com/2009/12/dick-morris-romney-is-virtually-out-of.html">GOP 12.</a>)</p><p>Fortunately for Romney, the good news is very good:&#160;Given Morris' recent history of prognostication, it's probably best to now consider Romney the front-runner for the nomination, if not a lock to win in the general.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/03/morris_romney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/03/morris_romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Really bad stock tips from Dick Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/31/stock_tips_from_dick_morris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/31/stock_tips_from_dick_morris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2009/08/31/stock_tips_from_dick_morris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many things does the Fox News commentator get wrong while touting an investment advice newsletter? Let's count]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick Morris, the Fox News commentator, political consultant and alleged foot-fetishist, has a stock tip for you: If you want to be prepared for the upcoming era of Obama "hyperinflation," sign up for Nicholas Vardy's Global Stock Investor newsletter.</p><p>Let me give you a stock tip of my own. Don't invest your money on the advice of people who don't understand the English language. Inflation <em>might</em> be a long-run threat, but <em>hyperinflation</em> is not.</p><p>The term "hyperinflation," technically speaking, refers to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation">inflation that is completely out-of-control,</a> rising, for example, by at least by 50 percent <em>a month</em> or worse. <a href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/05/a_few_words_about_inflation.php">As Ryan Avent told us a few months ago,</a> Weimar Germany suffered through "a monthly rate of inflation of about 3,000,000 percent" in 1923. <em>That's</em> hyperinflation. Not even the bad old days of the late '70s during Jimmy Carter's presidency (with which Morris makes more than one Obama comparison) qualifies. Inflation was high, by American standards, but not hyper. Avent has it exactly right:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/31/stock_tips_from_dick_morris/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/31/stock_tips_from_dick_morris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/05/qotd_113/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/05/qotd_113/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/08/05/qotd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick Morris is not exactly a master of self-awareness]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Mjg4Y2YzMjI5MDQwYzRjMTllNjc2NDY4YTE0YmRiNGQ=">an interview</a> that the National Review's Kathryn Jean Lopez did with former Clinton advisor Dick Morris:&#160;</p><blockquote>
<p>KJL: Are we witnessing a Clintons comeback?</p>
<p>DM: No. Bill is probably just delighted to be relevant again.</p>
</blockquote><p>The irony of that statement coming from Morris is just amazing. He's made a fairly lucrative career for himself out of hating both Bill and Hillary Clinton ever since he resigned as campaign manager of then-President Clinton's 1996 reelection campaign when his involvement with a prostitute became public. Really, the fact that the Clintons continue to be relevant is what makes him at all relevant -- especially after he penned <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Condi-vs-Hillary-Great-Presidential/dp/0060859849/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1249505546&amp;sr=8-1">a book</a> predicting a 2008 presidential election battle between Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/05/qotd_113/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/05/qotd_113/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The expertise of Dick Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/dick_morris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/dick_morris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/03/10/dick_morris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the New York Post, the former political consulting powerhouse offers some advice to Barack Obama without acknowledging his earlier predictions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/03092008/news/nationalnews/its_time_to_call_in_hatchet_men_against__101033.htm">Writing in</a> the New York Post on Sunday, Dick Morris and his wife, Eileen McGann, offered some advice to <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/barack_obama/">Barack Obama</a>. "The Clintons' campaign attacks put Obama in a bind," the pair writes. "If he doesn't answer in kind, he's toast. </p><p>"But if he does, they'll have forced him off his winning message of hope and change from the bitter politics of the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/bill_clinton/">Bill Clinton</a> and <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/george_w_bush/">George W. Bush</a> eras. </p><p>"If they pull him off his game and onto theirs, they can wrest away the Democratic convention victory that he's earned. </p><p>"The solution for Obama is clear: Reply in kind, but do it through surrogates." </p><p>That left us wondering why Obama would take Morris' advice seriously at this point. Sure, Morris knows the Clintons well, having worked for <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/bill_clinton/">Bill Clinton</a> on several campaigns, most notably his 1996 reelection campaign, from which Morris resigned after his alleged affair with a prostitute was revealed. And he has made a career out of Clinton hatred ever since. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/dick_morris/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/dick_morris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Rush Limbaugh next?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/16/fairness_doctrine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/16/fairness_doctrine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/16/fairness_doctrine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives fear that Don Imus is the first casualty in a liberal-led media purge to force right-wing talkers off the air.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First they came for Don Imus. And now they'll come for Rush. </p><p>At least, that was the fear at the Free Congress Foundation on April 13, where a panel discussion of an ancient broadcasting regulation quickly turned into a discussion of <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2007/04/13/imus/index.html">Don Imus</a> and how his firing might portend a similar fate for some of the right's best-known media personalities. In the absence of any compelling evidence, participants in the latest of the conservative think tank's occasional Next Conservatism Forum series managed to convince themselves that the Fairness Doctrine, a rule that was scrapped by the Federal Communications Commission 20 years ago, was poised for a comeback, and was about to become a weapon in a liberal jihad against the right wing's freedom of speech. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/16/fairness_doctrine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/16/fairness_doctrine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exiling Dick Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/19/dick_morris_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/19/dick_morris_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2006/12/19/dick_morris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination, the political pundit pledges to leave the United States.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Dick Morris calling Hillary Clinton out? </p><p>In an appearance on Fox News' "Hannity & Colmes," the political strategist turned pundit vowed he'd flee the country if Sen. Clinton wins the Democratic nomination for president in 2008, with Barack Obama as her running mate, according to <a target="new" href="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/12/19/104142.shtml?s=al&promo_code=2B2E-1">NewsMax.com.</a> If anything, that pledge, surely, will only make Clinton more determined to run. </p><p>Morris managed Bill Clinton's successful 1996 reelection campaign until he was embroiled in a toe-sucking sex scandal with a prostitute. Since then, he has broken ties with the Clintons, and created a cottage industry out of critiquing them in his column in the New York Post and on Fox News. His Hillary hating has even included writing a book-length rebuttal of her memoir "Living History," as well as another book imagining a presidential election matchup between her and Condoleezza Rice. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/12/19/dick_morris_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/19/dick_morris_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A rift among the Hillary haters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/21/morris_22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/21/morris_22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/06/21/morris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, Dick Morris, jealous much?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/books/feature/2005/06/21/klein/index.html">"The Truth About Hillary"</a> hits the bookstores today, and the right is already soaking up every last salacious detail contained therein. But there's one usually reliable Hillary hater who doesn't seem so thrilled with the new book: <a target= "new" href="http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Comment/DickMorris/061505.html">Dick Morris</a>, whose own anti-Hillary book, "Rewriting History," will have to slide down the shelves to make way for Ed Klein's new smear job. </p><p>Morris, a former advisor to Bill Clinton, says in his column that Klein's accusations about the Clintons hit "below the belt" and "do not belong in the public dialogue." "I am no defender of Hillary Rodham Clintons, to put it mildly," Morris says. "But the recent charges in Ed Kleins book to the effect that she is a closet homosexual or that Bill raped her and that this act triggered Chelseas conception are as crazy as the list that was circulating around of the 20 or so people the Clintons allegedly had killed." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/06/21/morris_22/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/21/morris_22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Bush&#8217;s Terminator problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/08/12/recall_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/08/12/recall_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/08/12/recall</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger may be the GOP's best shot yet at a California comeback. But his playboy ways and pro-choice politics make him anathema to the president's allies on the Christian right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A few months after the U.S. Supreme Court called off the counting and awarded the presidency to George W. Bush, a New York Times reporter asked Republican strategist Karl Rove about the future for Republicans in California. The overall outlook was bleak. Al Gore had trounced Bush in the state without even trying; Democrats held virtually every statewide elective office and a huge lead in voter registration; and the California Republican Party was dysfunctional and in disarray. For the chief White House political strategist, there was just one bright spot in the Golden State: the hope that Arnold Schwarzenegger might someday run for governor. "That would be nice," Rove told the Times. "That would be really nice. That would be really, really nice." </p><p>Well, maybe. </p><p>Together with more than 190 other candidates who filed papers in time to meet last Saturday's deadline, Arnold Schwarzenegger is running for governor of California now. And while Bush told reporters Friday that he thought Schwarzenegger would make a "good governor," the White House may soon discover that a Terminator candidacy is not so nice after all. Although Schwarzenegger's run to replace Gov. Gray Davis is playing like the second coming for mainstream Republicans, it threatens to open a nasty rift between the Bush administration and the right-wing Christians to whom it usually kowtows. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/08/12/recall_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/08/12/recall_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary in a landslide?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/29/lazio_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/29/lazio_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2000/09/29/lazio</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The race for New York senator was said to be Rick Lazio's to lose. And right now he's losing in virtually every demographic group.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stick a fork in Rick? According to a new statewide poll published today, New York Rep. Rick Lazio's campaign for the Senate against first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton is in serious trouble with less than five weeks to go before Election Day. </p><p>The poll of likely voters, conducted by Newsday and New York television station WB-11, shows Clinton opening up a healthy 10-point lead, 52-42, in what for months had been a race statistically knotted. (Clinton's margin jumps to 14 percentage points among registered voters, 53-39.) More importantly, the poll of 1,101 voters, with a 4 percent margin of error, reveals Clinton dominating in virtually every demographic and in most regions around the state. </p><p>And with a companion poll showing Vice President Al Gore burying Gov. George W. Bush by 31 percentage points in New York (creating a likely tidal wave effect for Empire State Democrats), it adds up to a current of bad news for the Republican congressman. </p><p>The news may drive to distraction some of Clinton's vocal detractors in the press, who have been predicting her demise for nearly a year. Just last Monday, New York Post columnist Dick Morris, who has been wrong about this race with stunning regularity, told readers that his interpretation of the polls indicated Clinton was the one in deep trouble. Why? She was "stuck at 48 percent of the vote. Hillary has got to pull her poll number up to 50 percent in order to win." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/29/lazio_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/29/lazio_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The blundering pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/16/rudy_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/16/rudy_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2000/feature/2000/05/16/morris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick Morris&#039; predictions about the New York Senate race have all been off the mark.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>f <a href="/politics2000/directory/senate_candidates/rudy_giuliani/">Rudy Giuliani's</a> beleaguered strategists were looking for some encouraging signs this week as the mayor ponders his suddenly questionable run for Senate, they at least found one in Dick Morris' New York Post column. While many conservative pundits around the country spent the weekend suggesting that Giuliani's cancer scare and messy marital strife had ruined his chances to defeat <a href="/politics2000/directory/senate_candidates/hillary_clinton/">Hillary Rodham Clinton</a>, Morris weighed in yesterday with a ringing endorsement.</p><p>Under the banner headline "Run, Rudy, Run!" Morris boldly insisted, "None of the recent flaps that have engulfed the political career and personal life of Mayor Giuliani will have any real effect on his ability to win the U.S. Senate seat from New York." Last week's uncomfortable soap opera between Rudy and his angry wife "won't cost him a quarter of 1 percentage point" come election day, Morris argued with total certainty.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/16/rudy_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/16/rudy_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imagination unleashed in all its perverse glory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/05/mcmedia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/05/mcmedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/col/pagl/2000/04/05/mcmedia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Web: Let the Puritans figure out how to jam their mealy corks into the dike!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>M</b>edia over-promotion of <a href="/politics2000/directory/campaign_graveyard/john_mccain/index.html">Sen. John McCain</a> goes on and on. Where, oh, where will the alleged McCain voting bloc go, cries the bleeding-heart chorus, if <a href="/politics2000/directory/candidates/george_w_bush/index.html">Gov. George W. Bush,</a> who actually won the Republican nomination, does not fall on his knees to kiss McCain's signet ring?</p><p>No attention has been paid to an equally important question: Where will all the disaffected <a href="/politics2000/directory/campaign_graveyard/bill_bradley/index.html">Bill Bradley</a> Democrats (like me) go this fall if they decide they've had it up to the chops with the deceit and incompetence of the Clinton-Gore years?</p><p>Bush will never get my vote, since not only is he embarrassingly unprepared for the presidency but his party, with its weird congressional collection of milquetoasts, dodos and dunderheads, seems stuck in 1958. Nor can I imagine voting for <a href="/politics2000/directory/candidates/ralph_nader/index.html">Ralph Nader,</a> the consumer-rights crusader turned flake who could no more govern than my hero Andy Warhol -- another brooding, boyish, ethnic monastic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/05/mcmedia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/05/mcmedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And a little scumbag shall lead them</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/22/poni_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/22/poni_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/12/22/poni</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past week&#039;s news gush nearly tripped up attempts at year-end news wrap-ups, but James Poniewozik sees clearly: The big news this year was sex and the president.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">L</font>ast weekend, the  House of Representatives met in a special session to resolve one of the gravest matters ever put before it: selecting Time magazine's <a target="new" href="http://cgi.pathfinder.com/time/moy/index.html">Man of the Year.</a> At least that was the case if a gossip item in the New York Post was accurate -- that Time was standing by ready to name Hillary Clinton Woman of the Year if impeachment failed, and, failing a vote by press time, home-run king Mark McGwire.</p><p>It was a week to boggle the mind, a week to make history -- a week, in short, to totally fuck up year-in-review roundups. Forget politics stopping at the water's edge; the principle that was truly upended this past week is that no real news should occur between  Dec. 15 and Jan. 2. Then again, the last week in the news really <i>was</i> the year in the news, what with the simultaneous climaxes of the impeachment story and the bombing of -- oh, you know, that luminous green country with no people in it. Why bother rounding up 1998? We spent a year there last week.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/22/poni_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/22/poni_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bottom-feeder banquet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/09/justin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/09/justin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/1999/09/09/justin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Choking down crab cakes and savoring Beltway dish with the gourmets of gossip.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"T</b>hat lady who just walked by is part of the Monica Lewinsky thing." Johanna is sitting across from Heather and me in the booth.  Noticing the blank look on my face, she adds, "You know. The agent. Linda Tripp's friend."</p><p>"Which one?"</p><p>"With those two men."</p><p>I catch the woman's profile as she turns and heads for a table around the corner.  <a href="/news/1998/09/11newsc.html">"Goldberg,"</a> I say. "Something Goldberg."</p><p>It's Aug. 14, 1999, around 8:15 p.m., and we're having dinner at the Empire Hotel across from Lincoln Center.  Heather has flown in from L.A. to audition for a part that calls for an angry actress named Heather who works in a biker bar.  A real stretch.  She's always a little nonchalant when it comes to celebrities -- she's hung out at Kevin Costner's, had cocktails with Al Pacino, gotten kicked out of "Zorro" with Garry Shandling and been called the funniest woman in New York by Bill Maher -- so when we mention that Jerry Orbach walked in front of our car on 56th Street on our way to the hotel, she tells us she waited on him once when she was bartending at Hi-Life up on 83rd and Amsterdam. No big deal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/09/justin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/09/justin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You can call me Al</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/09/sharpton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/09/sharpton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/09/sharpton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In her effort to line up political support, Hillary Clinton extends an olive branch, and a White House invite, to Rev. Al Sharpton.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he Rev. Al Sharpton and Hillary Rodham Clinton are an unlikely couple indeed. But as Clinton's exploratory campaign for next year's New York Senate race gets under way, the former boy preacher who carries heavy racial baggage -- a pariah to some but a political prophet to others -- could prove to be a pivotal force in the election.</p><p>Already the press and public are watching to see how Clinton masters the arcane details of New York politics. But how she deals with the controversial Sharpton could become an early defining moment in the campaign, far more important than whether she can find Elmira on a map, identify the mayor of Poughkeepsie or figure out a politically correct vacation spot.</p><p>There is little doubt Sharpton will have some role in the campaign. Howard Wolfson, the exploratory committee spokesman, told Salon News, "If [Clinton] runs she will not be in the business of excluding people. We welcome the support of all New Yorkers." Asked if Sharpton had been given an actual role in the campaign, Wolfson said simply, "We will cross that bridge when we come to it."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/07/09/sharpton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/09/sharpton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budweiser: Bad for your waistline &#8212; and bad for America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/morris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/morris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/shal/1999/06/14/morris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick Morris is telling his clients to start running political-style hit attack ads. Here&#039;s Salon&#039;s exclusive look at the first crop.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>D</b>ick Morris, uncontrite guru of political attack ads, has a bright new idea. Now affiliated with the New England Consulting Group, he is urging his corporate clients to apply the tactics of negative, or "contrastive" advertising to their campaigns for consumer brands. In a June 14 <a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbes/99/0614/6312156a.htm">interview with Forbes</a>, he offered reporter Julie Androshick several examples of how his signature techniques could be applied to consumer pitches. For instance, Morris advised the Gap to retain its current advertising featuring teens dancing in khakis, but suggested that the company add this voice-over: "All of our clothing is produced in factories where there is no child labor and where there is housing for workers, not sweatshops." And he urged Reebok to focus on Nike's image problems with its suppliers. "The ad should show an American kid wearing Nike sneakers dribbling a basketball," said Morris. "He'd shoot, then you'd go to the kid who's barefoot in a third world country. And HE'S BAREFOOT SO <i>YOU</i> CAN WEAR NIKES!"</p><p>Sadly for Morris, companies contacted by Forbes rebuffed his innovative suggestions. "That's why he's a consultant, and we have our own ad agency," a Reebok spokesman scoffed to Androshick.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/morris/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/morris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The (un)friendly witness of Christopher Hitchens</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/07/hitchens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/07/hitchens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/1999/06/07/hitchens</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The journalist brings all his bile to bear on the president he hates.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"N</b>o One Left to Lie To: The Triangulations of William Jefferson Clinton," a slim little book by Christopher Hitchens, comes to a close with a slim little index. As anyone who has ever dieted knows, slimness is not achieved without sacrifice. As evidence of the sacrifices Hitchens has made, and as a service to the prospective reader, allow me to offer some names you will not find in the index, nor anywhere else in his trim, tidy tome: <a href="/news/special/clinton/">Rutherford Institute, the; Arkansas Project, the; Hale, David; Scaife, Richard Mellon; Steele, Julie Hiatt; McDougal, Susan.</a></p><p>But worthiness is not measured by size alone, and though "No One Left to Lie To" is diminutive, it aims to be the Brave Little Diatribe That Could, the book that will once and for all expose the mendacity and corruption and just plain rottenness that is Clintonism. To accomplish that goal, Hitchens will muster all the contempt he had nurtured for Clinton over the past seven years and set off chugging uphill.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/07/hitchens/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/07/hitchens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

