<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Directors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/directors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Five pop culture items we missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gwyneth Paltrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's catch: Gwyneth Paltrow is a 9/11 hero, Gerard Depardieu pees on people, and "Lone Ranger" nixes werewolves]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1. Cause of the day:</strong> Kate Winslet founds "<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/8700007/Kate-Winslet-joins-forces-in-cosmetic-surgery-battle.html">British Anti-Cosmetic Surgery League</a>" (for very famous people) along with Emma Thompson and Rachel Weisz. Maybe they can be like sister suffragettes and battle the <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/10/sarah_burge_breast_surgery_child">Barbie Mom</a>!</p><p><strong>2. Celebrity story involving airlines and urine of the day:</strong> When Gerard Depardieu wasn't allowed to use the toilet during takeoff, <a href="http://www.edmontonjournal.com/mobile/iphone/news/top-stories/Gerard+Depardieu+outrages+passengers+urinating+plane/5267196/story.html">he peed all over fellow passengers on an Air France flight</a>. Says Air France spokesperson: "I confirm the fact that he [Depardieu] did indeed urinate in the plane." That is all.</p><p><strong>3. "Gwyneth Paltrow saved my life on 9/11" story of the day:</strong> Wait, really? I could almost forgive Paltrow for her multitude of sins if she acted heroically on Sept. 11. So let's check it out:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Bay life lessons: Stress management</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the films of the "Transformers" auteur can teach you about dealing with pressure and everyday hassles]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be some dispute over the quality of Michael Bay's directorial skills, but no one can deny that the man has a certain panache. With films about killer robots, killer comets and Peal Harbor, Bay's oeuvre may be full of violence, but they're also full of learning moments for the neurotically inclined.</p><p>Better than Tony Robbins or a self-help book, Michael Bay's movies are an advanced class on dealing with life when it hands you lemons. <em>Lemons that are actually grenades and you have two minutes to deactivate before the whole country goes ka-BLAM</em>!</p><p>Welcome to Michael Bay's stress management guide. Now take a deep breath, and go to your calm place...</p><p>
    <strong>Lesson 1: Keep your mantras simple</strong>
  </p><p>Everybody's had those days when life seems determined to weigh you down. While you might be inclined to give up and throw a pity party complete with a "Teen Moms" marathon and a bucket of ice cream, it's good to remember those wise words of Yoda: "Do or do not. There is no try." Though if you don't like taking advice from a short green guy, how about Sean Connery, who paraphrases the famous "Star Wars" line to a whiny Nicholas Cage in "The Rock."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spike Lee to direct &#8220;Oldboy&#8221; remake?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/oldboy_will_smith_spike_lee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/oldboy_will_smith_spike_lee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/07/06/oldboy_will_smith_spike_lee</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumors of adapting the cult manga/revenge film for American audiences still include Will Smith]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Warning:</strong> <em>This article contains a major plot spoiler for the film "Oldboy."</em></p><p>Since Park Chan-wook's South Korean revenge flick "Oldboy" won the <a href="http://rki.kbs.co.kr/english/news/news_Po_detail.htm?No=20961&amp;id=Cu">Grand Prix at Cannes in 2004</a>, producers have been trying to find a way to bastardize the project into a more American-friendly version. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117995429?refCatId=13%20director">Steven Spielberg and Will Smith have both been attached to the title</a> since 2008 (after director Justin Lin and Nic Cage <a href="http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/news/a134959/smith-spielberg-eye-oldboy-remake.html">dropped out of the running</a>), though rumors have been swirling that the project has been dead in the water <a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Will-Smith-s-Oldboy-Remake-Is-Dead-15622.html">for at least a year</a>.</p><p>There are basically two camps of thought on an "Oldboy" remake: the people who think that adapting the story of Oh Dae-Su -- a man locked in a hotel room for 15 years and then mysteriously freed in order to find his captors -- from either its original <a href="http://manga.animea.net/old-boy-chapter-1-page-3.html">Japanese manga</a> or its cinematic counterpart is a terrible idea ... and those who aren't familiar with the story.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/oldboy_will_smith_spike_lee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/oldboy_will_smith_spike_lee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Bay plagiarizes Michael Bay for &#8220;Transformers 3&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Dark of the Moon's" dark secret: Shots from "The Island" appear in summer blockbuster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most famous directors have a signature style that lets you know you are watching one of their films: David Lynch will give you red curtains and flickering matches, Scorsese will have "Gimmie Shelter" slipped somewhere in between the violent acts of mob crime, and Steven Spielberg ... well, Steven Spielberg <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2011/06/11/what_super_8_took_from_steven_spielberg/index.html">has a lot of recurring motifs</a>. But at what point does a cinematic thumbprint turn into lazy self-plagiarism?</p><p>The answer to this theoretical film query has been answered by none other than Michael Bay, whose auteur work can be boiled down to "big things blowing up or hitting other big things." But even with that not-too-original concept, Bay has gotten sloppy: allegedly taking direct shots from his 2005 flop "The Island" and putting them in "Transformers 3: Dark of the Moon."</p><p>Last week, a viral-video pirate named Jermain Odreman spent a considerable amount of time watching Bay's movies in slow-motion <a href="http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/07/05/michael-bay-recycles-footage-from-2005-film-for-transformers/">in order to catch almost identical sequences from both films</a>. The footage is unquestionably similar, down to the type of car that flips over, the angle of the smoke from the explosion, and the damage done by flying shrapnel.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jackson Pollock reimagined with the trippy &#8220;Dripped&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/dripped_jackson_pollock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/dripped_jackson_pollock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/06/03/dripped_jackson_pollock</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An animated short exposes one of the 20th century's greatest artists as a cat burglar and art-eater]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;Ed Harris did a great job playing the alcoholic, abstract expressionist Jackson Pollock in the 2000 film about the artist's life and work. (Fun fact: Remember <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0183659/">how the actor directed that film as well</a>? Ed Harris is the man.) The struggle between his vulnerable neurosis and volatile personality -- especially in the context of his relationship with his wife, Lee Krasner, over the years -- was portrayed with less restraint than we've come to expect from stone-faced Harris, and overall made for a great film about a difficult subject.</p><p>That being said: At no point in "Pollock" did the artist grow wings after eating famous Renaissance paintings he stole from a museum before regurgitating his own still lifes into speckled visual jazz riffs. <a href="http://leo-verrier.com/">L&#233;o Verrier's</a> animated eight-minute short "Dripped" is a whimsical interpretation of Jackson's love of all art, and his eventual realization that he doesn't have to "bite" off other talent in order to create his own masterpieces.</p><p>OK, so it's not quite a literal biography, but it's stylistically entrancing nonetheless; like something from an early Chuck Jones cartoon on acid.</p><p>
    <iframe frameborder="0" height="225" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/24455397?color=969696" width="400"></iframe>
  </p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/24455397">Dripped</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/chezeddy">ChezEddy</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/dripped_jackson_pollock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/dripped_jackson_pollock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lars von Trier&#8217;s &#8220;Melancholia&#8221;: an apocalyptic wedding</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/08/melancholia_trailer_von_trier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/08/melancholia_trailer_von_trier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/08/melancholia_trailer_von_trier</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when "Rachel Getting Married" meets "Donnie Darko?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who saw Danish director Lars von Trier's last film "Antichrist" may be scared away from his latest feature, "<a href="http://www.melancholiathemovie.com/">Melancholia</a>." Don't worry: as far as I know, this movie features way less genital mutilation and talking foxes.</p><p>It does however, have an hodgepodge cast seemingly picked from names out of a European bowler/and or ironic trucker hat, with stars like Kirsten Dunst, Alexander Skarsgard ("True Blood") and his father Stellan ("Good Will Hunting"), Kiefer Sutherland, Charlotte Gainsbourg, Charlotte Rampling ("The Night Porter), and John Hurt.</p><p>As for the plot, the Dogma 95 creator seems to have abandoned his realistic style halfway through the movie for a more Richard Kelly aesthetic. Kirsten Dunst is getting married to Skarsgard, and their wedding is being held at the house of his sister (Gainsbourg) and husband (Sutherland). There is some family melodrama, and then there is a lot of hailing and odd weather. Maybe Gainsbourg hates Dunst because of an incestuous love of her brother? Whoops, no time to find out, the world is ending.</p><p>
    <iframe frameborder="0" height="225" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/22072654?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff" width="400"></iframe>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/08/melancholia_trailer_von_trier/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/08/melancholia_trailer_von_trier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8220;Goodfellas&#8221; overrated?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/goodfellas_on_trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/goodfellas_on_trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/09/27/_goodfellas_on_trial</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Scorsese film celebrates its 20th anniversary, two critics go head-to-head about its legacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For most viewers, Martin Scorsese's "Goodfellas" requires no defense. The director's sprawling gangster picture was released 20 years ago this month, and although it got beaten that year at the Oscars by Kevin&#160;Costner's western "Dances With Wolves" -- still a sore point for the director's fans -- it has been a constant presence on TV and on home video ever since. It has been quoted, parsed and imitated so regularly that its relentless pace, gallows humor and&#160; bursts of graphic violence have passed into pop culture's DNA.&#160; It is, by any yardstick, a modern classic.</p><p>Or is it?&#160;I&#160;recently got into an online argument about the movie with the New York-based journalist Ian Grey, who admires some of Scorsese's movies but considers "Goodfellas" overrated, shallow and in many ways indefensible, even by the morally provocative standards of the gangster film. Rather than commemorate the anniversary with yet another piece about how great and influential it is (and I&#160;personally think it's both), I thought it would be more interesting to debate the film's merits in a public forum against principled opposition. Grey does not think the world of "Goodfellas," and is happy to tell you why.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/goodfellas_on_trial/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/goodfellas_on_trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The delightful disappearance of Jean-Luc Godard</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/30/godard_oscars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/30/godard_oscars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/08/30/godard_oscars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Oscars want to celebrate the legendary French director, but he's nowhere to be found. More power to him!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced last week that Jean-Luc Godard would be given an honorary Oscar at a non-televised ceremony in November, along with Eli Wallach and film preservationist Kevin Brownlow. Normally such a move would prompt a number of questions, such as: Would Godard, a famously anti-Hollywood filmmaker, accept or decline such an award? &#160;If he accepted, would Godard even show up, and if he showed up, what would he say? Would he hector the room about the corporatization of cinema, which is even more pernicious now than it was 50 years ago, when Godard made the jump from Marxist film critic to new wave filmmaker? &#160;Or would Godard, who has been vocal in supporting the Palestinians against the Israelis, and has been accused of anti-Semitism throughout much of his career, pull a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvMoGAy7q9c">Vanessa Redgrave</a>?</p><p>All these questions have been tabled for now until another one can be answered: Where is Godard?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/30/godard_oscars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/30/godard_oscars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When should a director stop messing with a movie?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/17/not_so_final_cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/17/not_so_final_cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dvd reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/08/16/not_so_final_cuts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Film recuts can destroy a classic or salvage a lost gem: Here's your guide to the successes -- and disasters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sitting in my in box is a press release about a Blu-Ray edition of "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Last-Mohicans-Directors-Expanded/dp/B00005221M">The Last of the Mohicans</a>" that's being hyped as "an all-new director's definitive cut by acclaimed director Michael Mann."</p><p>The phrase "definitive cut" made me laugh. I like Mann's films <a href="http://www.movingimagesource.us/articles/zen-pulp-pt-4-20090715">a lot</a>, but definitive he ain't. He's a serial recutter, and this is his third go-round with "Mohicans." The first was the 1992 theatrical cut, which remained unchanged until 1999, when Mann released a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/03/movies/home-video-back-for-fixes-on-the-frontier.html">second version</a> on DVD that removed four minutes but added eight (mostly small moments of character development). I have no idea what this new version will contain, and frankly I'm in no hurry to find out, or buy the disc, for that matter. Why? Because I don't want to encourage Mann to continue tinkering with his movies -- and because the entire phenomenon of director's cuts and definitive director's cuts and restored cuts and expanded cuts and alternate cuts has gotten out of hand and needs to stop.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/17/not_so_final_cuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/17/not_so_final_cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging &#8220;City Island&#8221;: Until we meet again!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/03/de_felitta_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/03/de_felitta_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/05/03/de_felitta_12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So long, farewell, adieu and thanks -- and a trove of directorial wisdom from Robert Altman and Billy Wilder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my last Salon column. How the hell much more horn-tooting can I really do and still retain the faintest amount of self-respect? I'd like to thank Salon for generously offering me this space and the freedom to write about anything I wanted (anything "City Island"-connected, that is) at pretty much any length I chose. The audience I was able to reach and who were thus able to hear about "City Island" was, of course, tremendous. The movie has expanded weekend after weekend into more cities, and is in the process of becoming a bona fide "sleeper hit" -- a movie that the industry naysayers didn't initially see a lot of value in, but one that has outlasted many of the movies that opened alongside it and is growing stronger with every showing. (You can find updated theater listings on our <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=381514684404">Facebook page.</a>) The audience -- as always -- wound up in charge. Our audiences are giving "City Island" a remarkable life that couldn't have been anticipated.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/03/de_felitta_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/03/de_felitta_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directors of the decade: No. 7: Steven Soderbergh</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/21/steven_soderbergh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/21/steven_soderbergh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors of the Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2009/12/20/steven_soderbergh</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He may be frustratingly opaque and comically prolific, but he isn't afraid to gamble -- or fail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven Soderbergh has directed 17 features and produced two TV series in 10 years, often working simultaneously as director, producer, co-writer, cinematographer (under the pseudonym Peter Andrews) and editor (as Mary Ann Bernard). The sheer volume of his output, coupled with his technical daring, formal playfulness and versatility, beg a number of questions. To wit:</p><p>Is Soderbergh a great director making movies in order to explore life, art and his own tangled self, or a man who struggles to find things to say in order to justify making movies? Is Soderbergh's work united by strong thematic and conceptual threads or by sheer enthusiasm? How is it possible that Soderbergh could be so prolific without turning into a hack? Can any man this fearsomely productive have anything resembling an actual life? Or is the distinction between an actual life and a filmed life more or less moot in an age of surveillance, media and society-wide navel-gazing, an age in which every corner of reality has an aspect of the virtual? And if Soderbergh were ordered by some higher power to go 12 months without picking up a camera, would he emerge a stronger, deeper and more emotionally accessible filmmaker, or be found dead of liver failure in a skid row motel, the room's TV screen endlessly replaying the DVD menu for Jean-Luc Godard's "Contempt"?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/21/steven_soderbergh/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/21/steven_soderbergh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Ecuador&#8217;s Indians bankrupt Chevron?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/10/crude/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/10/crude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradise Lost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2009/09/10/crude</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Documentarian Joe Berlinger on the amazing Amazon pollution case in "Crude" -- and its link to the West Memphis 3]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art c">
    <img class='wp-image-10050996' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/09/story12.jpg' />
  </div>
</p><p><a href="/nov96/paradise961118.html">Joe Berlinger</a> is such a tireless talker -- a spinner of anecdotes and theories, and alternately an ardent defender and harsh critic of his own work -- that I should let him explain <a href="http://www.crudethemovie.com/">"Crude"</a> in his own words. Briefly, though, this new documentary from the co-director of "Paradise Lost," "Brother's Keeper" and <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/07/09/metallica/">"Metallica: Some Kind of Monster"</a> explores the epic-scale, endlessly complicated story of one of the largest lawsuits in history. It's the suit in which the indigenous inhabitants of Ecuador's Amazonian jungle are on the verge of winning a massive judgment from Chevron -- a court-appointed expert has suggested $27 billion -- for the poisoning of their homeland, previously among the most pristine and biodiverse rain forest regions on the planet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/10/crude/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/10/crude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Nora Ephron the foodiest filmmaker?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/05/nora_ephron/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/05/nora_ephron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2009/08/05/nora_ephron</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The director of "Julie &#038; Julia" opens up about her great passion, on-screen and off: Food]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Julie &amp; Julia," the movie written and directed by Nora Ephron, is based on two books about two cooks, one world-famous and one world-weary, and there is little question that watching it provokes a physiological response. It makes you crave hollandaise. It makes you want souffl&#233;. It might even, briefly, make you hungry for aspic made of beef feet.</p><p>I was probably destined to swoon over "Julie &amp; Julia," given my love for Paris, in which it is set; for food, on which it runs; for Julia Child, whose story it tells; for Meryl Streep, who embodies her with galumphing surety; and for Ephron, who binds it all together (and, with whom, in the interest of disclosure, I have become friendly in the years since I <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2006/08/08/ephron/">profiled her</a> for Salon).</p><p>So take my enthusiasms knowing full well my prejudices, but watching "Julie &amp; Julia" was like having fizzing joy injected directly into my veins. And it wasn't just about the sizzle of the sole meuni&#232;re and the glisten of the oysters slurped down at Parisian market stalls.</p><p>The deeper pleasures of the movie come not from the gloss and satisfying chomp of it all, but from the empty spots, the hungers and the imperfections.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/05/nora_ephron/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/05/nora_ephron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthony Minghella, 1954-2008</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/18/minghella/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/18/minghella/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I.P.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//2008/03/18/minghella</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar-winning director of "English Patient" and other high-class literary adaptations dies suddenly in London.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="art r" style="width: 225px"><img class='wp-image-10083741' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/03/story50.jpg' />
<p class="credit">REUTERS/Gary Hershorn/Files</p>
<p class="caption">Director Anthony Minghella after winning the Oscar for best director for his movie "The English Patient" in March 24, 1997. Minghella died in London at the Charing Cross Hospital after suffering a fatal hemorrhage.</p>
</div>
<p> English writer and director Anthony Minghella has died at age 54, according to various <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7302841.stm">news reports.</a> It's a sad and early departure for one of the best-loved figures in the British film industry. Minghella was chairman of the British Film Institute, where he had vowed to stem the outflow of British talent to the United States. He won the 1997 best-director Oscar for <a href="/nov96/movies2961118.html">"The English Patient,"</a> an international hit that launched a new wave of high-gloss, star-studded literary adaptations. His other films as a director included "Truly Madly Deeply" in 1990, <a href="/ent/movies/review/1999/12/24/ripley/">"The Talented Mr. Ripley"</a> in 1999 and <a href="/ent/movies/review/2003/12/25/cold_mountain/">"Cold Mountain"</a> in 2003. Minghella apparently underwent surgery for a growth in his neck last week at Charing Cross Hospital in London. He had seemed to be recovering normally, but suffered a fatal hemorrhage early on Tuesday morning. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/18/minghella/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/18/minghella/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m an interesting, talented artist but I can&#8217;t take the rejection!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/13/rejection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/13/rejection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/since_you_asked//2007/08/13/rejection</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it's part of the game, but it's beginning to defeat me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Dear Cary,</b> </p><p><b>I'm an artist -- it's the thing I've had since childhood, the thing I took for granted.</b> </p><p><b>So I took it for granted and followed other paths -- writing fiction and filmmaking.</b> </p><p><b>I went to grad school, I published some books and many articles (nonfiction). I wrote (and sold) some screenplays. I directed some films and produced some TV shows.</b> </p><p><b>So I'm sorta successful, but I still feel that "artist" is my life's calling. It's what I'm best at and what I love. And yes, I go through all the crap too -- the stress, the inaction, the procrastination and so on, but I really feel it's what I was born to do. People like it -- smart people, the people I'd hoped would like it, and they like it for the right reasons. I sell enough out of my studio to counter my expenses (not huge but significant nonetheless). I've been selected for juried shows by curators of major museums and been waitlisted on grants and residencies that are awarded to emerging contemporary artists -- exactly where I'd hope my artwork would fall within the giant spectrum of the art world.</b> </p><p><b>But it has yet to pay off with true success: representation by a gallery, which is the equivalent of getting an agent and all that that would hopefully bring.</b> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/08/13/rejection/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/13/rejection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter Bogdanovich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/04/19/bogdanovich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/04/19/bogdanovich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2002 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/conv/2002/04/19/bogdanovich</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The director of "The Cat's Meow" discusses the truth about "Citizen Kane," the philanderings of Charlie Chaplin and the lies Hollywood tells us about death and dying.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sneering at Peter Bogdanovich's name has been an art form in some circles for so long that when you meet the man, you expect the insufferable popinjay whom writers still have a field day skewering. This is the man who, according to the Los Angeles Times, sported $323 blue leather clogs in court just prior to filing bankruptcy in 1997. The man who married (and later divorced) his lover Dorothy Stratten's half-sister Louise several years after Stratten was brutally murdered by her jealous husband. The man who stole Truffaut's shtick by going from film scribe to filmmaker, and so on. </p><p>Even if some critics hailed early flicks like "The Last Picture Show" and "Paper Moon," by the early '80s most seemed to agree with John Simon's acerbic assessment that Bogdanovich's "entire filmmaking prowess is not much more than a mnemonic feat." Whatever; in person, the 62-year-old is thoroughly charming, and lacks the pretense so often ascribed to him by caricaturists. Can a guy who schleps his own water around with him in a tote bag be all bad? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/04/19/bogdanovich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/04/19/bogdanovich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frederick Wiseman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/30/wiseman_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/30/wiseman_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/conv/2002/01/30/wiseman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The grandfather of cin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though he gets less press than, say, Scorsese or Spielberg (or Brett Ratner or Tom Green, for that matter), <a target="new" href="http://www.zipporah.com/">Frederick Wiseman</a> for over 30 years has quietly forged a lasting impression of our nation on celluloid. The Cambridge-based documentarian, along with D.A. Pennebaker and the Maysles brothers, is a pioneer of cin&eacute;ma v&eacute;rit&eacute;. In its early years, cin&eacute;ma v&eacute;rit&eacute; consisted of more than just its stylistic trappings (grainy footage, hand-held camera work and natural sound); it sought to reveal the underlying truths of situations by capturing the unscripted action of real people. Think of the v&eacute;rit&eacute; filmmakers as the very disappointed stepfathers of "The Real World" and "Cops." </p><p>Wiseman, whose works include "High School," "Hospital" and "Public Housing," began making films while working as a law school professor in 1967. "Titicut Follies," his searing expos&eacute; of Bridgewater State Hospital for the Criminally Insane in Massachusetts, earned him much acclaim, as well as several lawsuits. Ever since, Wiseman has trained his camera, and his critical gaze, on the workings and practices of American institutions. PBS has a long-standing agreement to broadcast each of his films as they come out. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/01/30/wiseman_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/30/wiseman_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/06/lynch_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/06/lynch_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2001 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2001/11/06/lynch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pleasant, bizarre filmmaker who gave us the Lynchian world insists that now, more than ever, we must face the darkness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a car wash on La Brea Avenue in Los Angeles not far from David Lynch's home in the Hollywood Hills. Its marquee is supposed to read "God Bless America," but the 'B' has fallen off. The message that's left -- "God Less America" -- is an accordingly odd mixture of eerie and comical. In other words, it makes for a perfect Lynchian moment. </p><p>Forget Oscars and Golden Globes, thumbs up and four stars: The greatest accolade for any filmmaker is immortality through the common adjective. There is no finer tribute to Alfred Hitchcock, for example, than the acceptance of "Hitchcockian" as a term denoting unease, suspense and intrigue. Likewise, "Felliniesque" elicits visions of chaotic, colorful, circuslike surroundings, and "Bergmanesque" can only mean oppressive melancholy and the absence of God. </p><p>But the list essentially stops there, save for the one contemporary filmmaker to conceive an entire world so unquestionably his own that you can only call it by name. "Lynchian" has seeped into our consciousness as a bizarre intersection of the macabre and the mundane, once described by novelist David Foster Wallace this way: </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/11/06/lynch_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/06/lynch_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mel Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/19/brooks_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/19/brooks_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2001/06/19/brooks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comedy impresario currently steamrolling Broadway owes "Blazing Saddles," fart humor and his dancing Hitler to a red rubber ball.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sondheim didn't do it. Bernstein didn't, either. Rodgers and Hammerstein put together didn't come close. No, the creator of the Broadway show that smashed all the box office records is the man who gave us "Spaceballs." The maestro who revitalized the Great White Way is the guy who brought fart jokes to major motion pictures. And the impresario whose show netted an unprecedented 12 Tony awards was also the only winner to ever thank Hitler in his acceptance speech. </p><p>Like his hit musical "The Producers," Mel Brooks is an unlikely combination of innocent optimism, bawdy irreverence and unbridled chutzpah. And if, at age 75, Brooks is the bright new darling of the American theater, it's because he has spent a lifetime brazenly getting in our faces and shamelessly prodding us to laugh, and because, for all the alleged comedy in our must-see TV and Tom Green world, we're starved for real humor. We need Mel Brooks to make us laugh as much as he needs to make us laugh. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/19/brooks_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/19/brooks_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liv Ullmann</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/28/ullmann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/28/ullmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/conv/2001/03/28/ullmann</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The renowned actress and director of "Faithless" talks about quick flings in Paris, her pal Ingmar Bergman and how scared we all are.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adultery is a dead subject. From Hester Prynne to <a href="/directory/topics/monica_lewinsky/index.html">Monica Lewinsky,</a> there's very little we seem to want to say about it anymore. Thus, it makes perfect sense that someone like Liv Ullmann would take on the scarlet "A" in her latest film, "Faithless." Ullmann is not jaded, nor does she offer easy answers; on the subject of morality, she's more interested in what the audience might have to say. In the hands of many other contemporary directors, a film about adultery has the tendency to be pedantic and overly moralistic, featuring, say, Harrison Ford. Ullmann knows better. She ought to -- her many years as one of Ingmar Bergman's lead actors have left their mark, and her directing style reflects his light touch. </p><p> "Faithless" was written by Bergman and is based on actual events from his life. It tells the story of Maryanne, who engineers an adulterous affair with her husband's best friend. What starts out as a simple plan ends in tragedy. But the film is full of ambiguity, and offers no swelling strings to guide the viewer toward the proper conclusion. There are fantastical Bergman-esque elements, too: In the opening frames, an elderly writer named Bergman conjures up the character Maryanne from his memory, and Maryanne begins to recount her painful tale. Or perhaps she never existed, and the whole event is a fiction. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/03/28/ullmann/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/03/28/ullmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

