<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Disney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/disney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Disney&#8217;s fat-shaming fail</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/disneys_fat_shaming_fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/disneys_fat_shaming_fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12449841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mouse misfires with an ambitious, awful health campaign]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn't think the people whose theme parks feature a <a href="http://disneyworld.disney.go.com/parks/magic-kingdom/attractions/many-adventures-of-winnie-the-pooh/">binge-eating bear</a> with a honey gut would put itself in the business of fat shaming, but that's exactly what Disney did this month. In a boneheaded stab at promoting healthy lifestyle choices, the happiest place on earth became a considerably less hospitable environment when it debuted a new interactive "Habit Heroes" exhibit at Epcot. Guess who the villains were?</p><p>A collaboration between Disney and Blue Cross and Blue Shield to help teach kids to "fight bad habits," the Epcot attraction and tie-in app and Web page featured buff, virtuous characters Will Power and Callie Stenics squaring off against nemeses like the lazy, grotesque "Lead Bottom" and the self-explanatorily named "Glutton." Apparently, when a company famed for its meticulous crafting of exactly what children want and one of the largest health insurers in the nation pool their talents, they come up with "Fat people are bad."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/disneys_fat_shaming_fail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/disneys_fat_shaming_fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can &#8220;Winnie the Pooh&#8221; save Disney from Pixar?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/winnie_the_pooh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/winnie_the_pooh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toy Story 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2011/07/12/winnie_the_pooh</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An utterly charming new adventure with the Bear of Little Brain offers a delicious antidote to digital animation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a Bear of Very Little Brain redeem the tarnished reputation of Walt Disney's venerable animation studio and stake his place on the cultural landscape alongside Buzz Lightyear and Lightning McQueen? That's a lot to ask of a tubby little cubbie whose principal concern is finding a pot of honey -- sorry, <em>hunny</em> -- but Disney's whimsical and charming new <a href="http://disney.go.com/pooh/">"Winnie the Pooh"</a> feels simultaneously like a return to the company's more innocent past and a refreshing new direction. Specifically recalling the hand-drawn animation style of the widely beloved 1966 "Winnie the Pooh and the Honey Tree" and its sequels (anthologized in the 1977 collection "The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh"), and delivering only the faintest contemporary tweak to the Milne material, Stephen J. Anderson and Don Hall's "Winnie the Pooh" will thoroughly delight both the under-10 set and their nostalgic parents. Look for this to be a surprisingly potent sleeper hit; I'm going a second time this weekend.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/winnie_the_pooh/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/winnie_the_pooh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pixar releases trailer for upcoming film, &#8220;Brave&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/new_pixar_trailer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/new_pixar_trailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2011/06/28/new_pixar_trailer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The movie, which comes to theaters next summer, is a fairy tale set in the Scottish Highlands]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2011/06/27/cars_2_box_office/">big box office news</a>&#160;this past weekend was the success of Pixar's latest release, "Cars 2," in the face of less-than-friendly critics. In the wake of this triumph, the studio has released the trailer for its next film, "Brave," which is due to hit theaters next June.</p><p>The movie -- which takes place far from "Cars's" Radiator Springs, in the Scottish Highlands -- brings us Pixar's first-ever female protagonist: a flame-haired princess called Merida. <a href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/06/22/brave-poster-pixar-first-look/">Entertainment Weekly</a> has more:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/new_pixar_trailer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/new_pixar_trailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s must-see viral videos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/viral_videos_frank_sinatra_got_talent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/viral_videos_frank_sinatra_got_talent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackass 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/23/viral_videos_frank_sinatra_got_talent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch: America gets its Susan Boyle, a Southwest pilot's anti-gay rant, a touching Ryan Dunn tribute, and more]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <strong>1.	The U.S. gets its own Susan Boyle</strong>
  </p><p>"America's Got Talent" contestant <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2007143/Americas-Got-Talent-2011-Car-washer-Landau-Eugene-Murphy-Jr-blows-away-judges.html">Landau Eugene Murphy Jr.</a>, a car washer from West Virginia, was chided by Piers Morgan for chewing gum onstage. Then he opened his mouth so the ghost of Frank Sinatra could come out singing "I've Got You Under My Skin." Goosebumps!</p><p>
    <object height="390" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/v6LOSEzo1QA&amp;rel=0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/v6LOSEzo1QA&amp;rel=0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425"></embed></object>
  </p><p>
    <strong>2.	A tribute to Ryan Dunn that will last a lifetime</strong>
  </p><p>"Jackass'" Wee-Man, (aka Jason Acuna) cuts through all the anger and flame wars surrounding his friend's death and <a href="http://www.popeater.com/2011/06/23/wee-man-jason-acuna-ryan-dunn-tattoo-tribute-dead-car-crash-jackass/">gives him a uniquely touching memorial</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/viral_videos_frank_sinatra_got_talent/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/viral_videos_frank_sinatra_got_talent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we OK with Miley Cyrus in her underwear now?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/miley_cyrus_so_undercover_underwear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/miley_cyrus_so_undercover_underwear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/06/02/miley_cyrus_so_undercover_underwear</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the former Disney star old enough, at 18, to strip down without it becoming a scandal?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miley Cyrus ... can I ever look at you without feeling like a lecherous old man? From the time you were 15 and appeared on the cover of Vanity Fair <a href="http://www.hollywood.com/news/Annie_Leibovitz_Miley_Cyrus_Photos_Were_Misinterpreted/5226536">wearing only a sheet</a>, it's been a battle not to see you partially clothed everywhere I go.</p><p>Sometimes you're just the victim of a bad situation, like when those hackers leaked racy photos you took in 2008 for Joe Jonas, and <a href="http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=595152">posted them all over the Internet</a>. Or when <a href="http://a.abcnews.com/TheLaw/Technology/Story?id=6948781&amp;page=1">this happened again in 2010 and the FBI was called in</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/miley_cyrus_so_undercover_underwear/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/miley_cyrus_so_undercover_underwear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Disney still make a SEAL Team show?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/27/disney_navy_seal_trademark_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/27/disney_navy_seal_trademark_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/27/disney_navy_seal_trademark_show</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mickey pulls out of the patent process to trademark the famed squad that killed Osama, but is the merch dream dead?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a gracious move this week, Disney bowed out of trying to trademark the term "SEAL Team 6" -- the military group that killed Osama bin Laden -- <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304066504576345752703592770.html?mod=ITP_marketplace_0.">for merchandizing opportunities</a>. A shame, because I was really looking forward to seeing what kind of themed ride they were going to create at Epcot for this.</p><blockquote>
<p>Disney's intentions were misunderstood, according to a person familiar with the entertainment company's plans. Disney, which owns the ABC television network, is considering a TV show about the elite squad, similar to other fictional dramas about real-life arms of the military, such as "NCIS" and "JAG."</p>
<p>Plans for Disney's SEALs show remain tentative, the person familiar with the matter said. The other potential uses listed on the application didn't necessarily reflect products the company intended to create, this person said.</p>
</blockquote><p>Good for Disney for realizing that it's probably crass to try to trademark SEAL Team 6 for snow globes and a new character named Navy the SEAL (he's a giant seal) posing for pictures with the kids in the Magic Kingdom.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/27/disney_navy_seal_trademark_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/27/disney_navy_seal_trademark_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Prom&#8221; and the bland, creeping evil of girl culture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/prom_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/prom_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Takes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2011/04/28/prom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disney's wannabe tween hit mixes retro gender politics, impressive hair and empty multiculturalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's what I want to know about "prom." Not the new Disney movie "Prom," which is a would-be tween-oriented hit so scrubbed and sanitized and not worthy of paying attention to that it can barely be said to exist at all. I want to know when the senior prom, the ritual pre-graduation party involving corsages and limousines and (in my day) hilarious feathered hairdos and tuxedos in unnatural pastel shades of polyester with enormous foldover lapels, lost its definite article. (At my school it was actually called the senior ball -- the prom was for juniors -- and I don't think I know anybody who physically attended it. But let's move on before I start bawling about the girl I didn't ask who is now a prominent anthropologist.)</p><p>Anyway, in normal American speech it was once called "the prom" or "the senior prom"; these days "Prom" seems to have become a trademarked proper noun, and also a subset or metastatic offshoot of the corporatized girl-culture that brought us the princess craze. I suppose if my daughter (who is 7) had heard about Disney's "Prom" and wanted to see it, I'd let her go, with kind of a sinking feeling just below my solar plexus. First of all, it wouldn't make much of an impression on her because it's so boring, and second of all, it would strike her as a story set among a Stepfordian alien civilization, one with similar artifacts to our own but entirely different folkways and hairstyles.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/prom_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/prom_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why &#8220;Yellow Submarine&#8221; could have been a great remake</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/yellow_submarine_robert_zemeckis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/yellow_submarine_robert_zemeckis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/03/16/yellow_submarine_robert_zemeckis</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disney has nixed Robert Zemeckis' plans for reanimating The Beatles. Why this might actually be a bad thing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the world of animation, there is only one thing creepier than Claymation (sorry Gumby) and that is motion-capture technology. Talk about Uuncanny valley: movies like "Polar Express," "Beowolf," and Jim Carrey's "A Christmas Carol" aren't cute or fun, they are terrifying. Plus, it seems silly to spend millions of dollars to make <a href="http://img.slate.com/media/1/123125/2116707/2133610/2137155/060306_he_POLAR-EXP_Ex.jpg">an animated Tom Hanks look just like the real Tom Hanks</a>. Why not just use a non-animated Tom Hanks and save a bunch of money?</p><p>Which is why, when Robert Zemeckis (the man behind all the movies above) <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/bfdealmemo/2009/08/disney-zemeckis-board-yellow-submarine.html">declared in 2008</a> that he was going to remake The Beatles' 60 psychedelic cartoon "Yellow Submarine" using his trademark digital filmmaking style, it bordered on sacrilegious. We already had those creepy simulacrums of John and George playing in Beatles: Rock Band, and we hadn't heard anyone clamoring for more money to be made off of faux-sincere tributes to the band.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/yellow_submarine_robert_zemeckis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/yellow_submarine_robert_zemeckis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How &#8220;Hannah Montana&#8221; destroyed Billy Ray Cyrus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/16/hannah_montana_destroyed_billy_ray_cyrus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/16/hannah_montana_destroyed_billy_ray_cyrus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/02/16/hannah_montana_destroyed_billy_ray_cyrus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an anguished new interview, Miley Cyrus' dad rails against fame -- and the perils of being a stage dad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like countless parents around the world, Billy Ray Cyrus says that "Hannah Montana" is the bane of his existence. In a frank-to-the-point-of-wallowing <a href="http://www.gq.com/entertainment/celebrities/201103/billy-ray-cyrus-mr-hannah-montana-miley#ixzz1E7h79mws">new interview in GQ,</a> the man who unleashed Miley Cyrus on an unsuspecting public four years ago -- and played her manager dad on the show -- expresses deep regret about handing his family over to the Disney empire, and unnervingly Michael Lohan-like concern for his daughter's well-being. "I'm scared for her," he says of his famous child, drawing comparisons between her current trajectory and those of Kurt Cobain, Anna Nicole Smith and Michael Jackson. "She's got a lot of people around her that's [sic] putting her in a great deal of danger."</p><p>It has not been a great year for the elder Cyrus. In October, he filed for divorce from his wife, Tish. Less than a week later, video of his daughter <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/12/13/miley_cyrus_role_model">enthusiastically enjoying a bongful</a> of what was later reported to be salvia surfaced. She turned 18 in November, ended her "Hannah Montana" Disney series to record-breaking ratings in January, and is now, by her father's account, living a life that's "a train wreck."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/16/hannah_montana_destroyed_billy_ray_cyrus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/16/hannah_montana_destroyed_billy_ray_cyrus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney goes after newborns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/disney_marketing_to_newborns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/disney_marketing_to_newborns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/02/08/disney_marketing_to_newborns</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company tries to recruit customers in maternity wards. Back off already!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mouse is coming for your baby. No longer content to dominate the hearts, souls and bedspreads of America's <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/01/27/peggy_orenstein_cinderella_ate_my_daughter">princess-obsessed preschoolers</a> and Selena Gomez-wannabe tweens, the Walt Disney Co. is now, like a neurotic witch queen with ego issues, poised to weave its spell on infants from the moment the cord is cut and the birth goo is wiped off.</p><p>As the New York Times reported earlier this week, in the past month, Disney representatives have quietly moved into <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/07/business/media/07disney.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1%20adorned">580 maternity hospitals</a> around the country, offering new moms a free "Disney Cuddly Bodysuit" with assorted beloved Disney characters, and encouraging them to sign up for e-mail alerts from <a href="http://www.babyzone.com/disney-baby/">Disney Baby</a>, where "Disney Momgineers have been weaving their magic to create the softest, most huggable, cuddliest designs that are also cute as a button." Apparently the talking mice and sparrows they'd originally contracted to do the garment work wanted to unionize. The full new Disney baby line rolls out in stores and online in May.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/disney_marketing_to_newborns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/disney_marketing_to_newborns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Cinderella Ate My Daughter&#8221;: The evil reign of pink princesses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/peggy_orenstein_cinderella_ate_my_daughter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/peggy_orenstein_cinderella_ate_my_daughter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/01/27/peggy_orenstein_cinderella_ate_my_daughter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peggy Orenstein talks about the insidiousness of girlie-girl culture and how Hannah Montana leads to bullying]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing can quite rock a woman's worldview like navigating through the New Girl Order with her own offspring. Peggy Orenstein has been writing about girls and women's issues since the 1980s. In her books the best-selling author has explored the minds of "Schoolgirls" and the feminist state of "Flux." But in her already much-praised new book "<a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Cinderella-Ate-My-Daughter/Peggy-Orenstein/e/9780061711527">Cinderella Ate My Daughter: Dispatches From the Front Lines of the New Girlie-Girl Culture</a>," the mother of <a href="http://peggyorenstein.com/books/daisy.html">7-year-old daughter Daisy</a> investigates firsthand the market domination of princesses and pink, the slutification of tweens, and how social networking became the favored tool of a new generation of Mean Girls. It's a gripping, hilariously horrifying account of battling for your child's soul in the toy aisle, one that excoriates consumer culture while sympathizing with parents trying to make sense of it all.</p><p>As a mother of two young Barbie-loving daughters myself, I was riveted by Orenstein's blend of self-deprecation and outrage -- and eager to talk to her during the New York City leg of her book tour about baby princesses, the insidiousness of pink and, of course, Hannah Montana.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/peggy_orenstein_cinderella_ate_my_daughter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/peggy_orenstein_cinderella_ate_my_daughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Disney hiding the original &#8220;Tron&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/14/tron_legacy_nostalgia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/14/tron_legacy_nostalgia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/2010/12/14/tron_legacy_nostalgia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the hyped sequel finally comes out, the 1982 original is nowhere to be found. Are the marketers just ashamed?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe some things are better left in the past. Have you ever known the thrill of finding a pack of Pop Rocks at some off-the-wall candy store, and then remembered too late that Pop Rocks are actually pretty gross? Have you eagerly Netflixed some Sid &amp; Marty Krofft gems to share with your children, only to have them ask if you seriously spent your youthful Saturday mornings watching this Lidsville crap? Have you ever, upon reflection, considered that Sea Monkeys were your first real life lesson in disappointment?</p><p>And then there's "Tron." The science fiction flick about a hacker who gets sucked into the virtual world was a modest success when it was released in 1982, but its digital special effects and ahead-of-its-time storyline quickly made it legendary in nerd circles. I was a high school student and massive dork (not necessarily in that order) at the time, in a town whose domination by Stevens Institute of Technology made it fertile soil for lots of "Tron" obsession. Today, movies about <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/the_social_network/index.html">vaguely heroic computer dweebs</a> get nominated for Golden Globes. Back then, "Porky's" was more the order of the day, and "Lawnmower Man" was still a decade away.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/14/tron_legacy_nostalgia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/14/tron_legacy_nostalgia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney completes $663 million sale of Miramax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/04/us_disney_miramax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/04/us_disney_miramax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miramax Films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/03/us_disney_miramax</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Construction magnate Ron Tutor confirms that his investor group now owns the award-winning film studio]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Construction magnate Ron Tutor can now call himself a Hollywood mogul.</p><p>The chief executive of Tutor-Saliba Corp. confirmed Friday that the group of investors he leads completed its deal to buy the award-laden studio Miramax Films from The Walt Disney Co.</p><p>Disney said the sale to Filmyard Holdings LLC was for $663 million, subject to certain adjustments. Filmyard's investors include Tutor, real estate investment group Colony Capital LLC and its CEO Tom Barrack and Qatar Holding LLC, the Middle Eastern country's investment firm.</p><p>The deal was announced in July, but its closing was delayed amid concerns about bank financing.</p><p>Tutor on Friday told The Associated Press that Barclays PLC was the lead bank in the financing.</p><p>"Everybody's smiling," he said. "We're excited, moving forward."</p><p>Mike Lang, a former business development executive at New Corp., has been hired as Miramax's new chief executive, Tutor said. He added that he would be more at liberty to talk about plans for the studio next week.</p><p>Miramax was founded in 1979 by Harvey and Bob Weinstein and named after their parents Miriam and Max. The studio is behind a string of Oscar winners including "Shakespeare in Love" (1998), "Chicago" (2002) and "No Country for Old Men" (2007).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/04/us_disney_miramax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/04/us_disney_miramax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demi Lovato may have used drugs before rehab</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/demi_lovato_alcohol_cocaine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/demi_lovato_alcohol_cocaine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/trending/2010/11/10/demi_lovato_alcohol_cocaine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New allegations and video suggest the star's troubles run deeper than we'd thought, include cocaine, drinking]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn't Demi supposed to be one of the "good" Disney girls? The wholesome daughter of a former Dallas Cowboys cheerleader? Heck, she was even a cast member on <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1349936/">"Barney and Friends."</a> Alas, if a report in Life &amp; Style magazine is to be believed, even the residents of the Mouse House and fans of the purple dinosaur like a little nose candy now and then.</p><p>While Lovato first made headlines last week for allegedly <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/11/03/demi_lovato_rehab/index.html">being treated for an eating disorder</a>, the reasons for her entry into rehab could be a little more complicated than that. A Texas college student claims he saw the pop princess doing <a href="http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/11/10/demi-lovatos-downward-spiral-fueled-by-alcohol-cocaine-report-claims/">"line after line like a pro"</a> at a house party. Oh, it gets worse: Someone claims to have <a href="http://perezhilton.com/2010-11-10-demi-lovato-caught-snorting-cocaine-on-camera">caught the whole thing on video</a>. Money quote: "F**k all of you, I'm famous, I don't care what any of you think of me the whole world loves me!" Lovato was 17 years old at the time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/demi_lovato_alcohol_cocaine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/demi_lovato_alcohol_cocaine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demi Lovato: Another Disney princess falls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/demi_lovato_rehab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/demi_lovato_rehab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/11/03/demi_lovato_rehab</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The teen star checks into treatment, allegedly for an eating disorder. How do we explain this to our kids?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you have little girls, you spend a lot of your time hunting for Polly Pocket's shoes, fending off requests for princess paraphernalia, and figuring out how to discuss the latest tabloid news about their Disney and Nickelodeon idols. My family doesn't even have cable, but that's how powerful and ubiquitous the tween industrial complex -- and its scandals -- are.</p><p>After <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2007/12/21/spears">"Zoey 101" star Jamie Lynn Spears</a> became a mother, my daughters and I had numerous conversations about how you don't have to be married &#8211; or even a grown-up &#8211; to have a baby.&#160; Miley Cyrus has prompted discussions about sexy dancing and how sometimes, creepy people take pictures of <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/06/15/miley_cyrus_upskirt">girls' underpants</a>. And believe me, it's a challenge to explain why you're implementing a strict <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2007/09/15/vanessa_hudgens/index.html">"no Googling Vanessa Hudgens"</a> policy. Just yesterday, my kids were begging me to stop under the big sign with Demi Lovato's face on it in the clothing department of Target, where racks of extra small sequined tank tops beckoned.&#160;Today, they're asking why the 18-year-old star is going to a treatment center. And what's a treatment center?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/demi_lovato_rehab/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/demi_lovato_rehab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney, Muslim worker agree on scarf substitute</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The park will allow a specially designed headscarf after initially objecting to her religious head covering]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disney is allowing a Muslim employee at its Southern California park to wear a specially designed headscarf after initially objecting to her religious head covering.</p><p>The Council on American-Islamic Relations said Monday that 22-year-old Noor Abdallah was told she couldn't wear the hijab while working as a vacation planner at a Disneyland Resort Esplanade ticket booth. She declined to take another job away from the public.</p><p>Disneyland spokeswoman Suzi Brown says the park worked with Abdallah to design a covering to match her costume and meet her religious needs. She's been wearing a blue scarf topped with a beret since early this month.</p><p>Brown says the case is separate from that of another Muslim Disney worker who refused to accept a costume headpiece and filed a federal discrimination complaint.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tinker &#8230; bill? Disney fairies get a sex change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/disney_boy_fairies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/disney_boy_fairies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/04/28/disney_boy_fairies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At long last, boys come to Pixie Hollow -- and that's a win for kids of both genders]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, after school, girls across the land will log on to <a href="http://pixiehollow.go.com">Pixie Hollow</a>, one of Disney's most popular Web sites, and become boys. Not just boys. Fairies who are boys.</p><p>Tinker Bell and her mischievous crew of fluttery scamps have been familiar to little girls &#8211; and their parents &#8211; ever since Disney rolled out the fairy franchise in the mid 2000s. They're a clever way of keeping girls who've outgrown the whole princess thing locked in the Mouse's clutches a little longer, and the closest thing Disney has to Bratz. And from the day the company <a href="http://promomagazine.com/interactivemarketing/news/1024-tinker-bell-online-home/">launched its online community Pixiehollow.com</a> in 2008, kids have been able to reinvent themselves as their own sparkly fairy avatars &#8211; as long as those avatars were girls.</p><p>But children are pretty resourceful little <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/03/04/shiloh_jolie_pitt_hair_drama/index.html?source=rss&amp;aim=/mwt/feature">gender warriors</a>. The open secret around the Hollow has long been that if you make your fairy tall, with short hair, and give her an ambiguous name like Jamie, she can pretty quickly establish a reputation as a he. Hey, Mom and Dad, we've got your rigid gender roles <em>r</em><em>ight here.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/disney_boy_fairies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/disney_boy_fairies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The perfect double bill: &#8220;Princess and the Frog&#8221; and &#8220;Song of the South&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/double_bill_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/double_bill_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Perfect Double Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Princess and the Frog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/03/16/double_bill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the lovely, calculated tale of Princess Tiana a response to the most notorious film in Disney history?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live to serve, in this forum at least, but I must deliberately frustrate you now.</p><p>I want to entice you into seeing a movie that you are not allowed to see. Rest assured, I do not take this lightly. But you should be frustrated, because the reasons why you aren't allowed to screen the second half of this double bill is why the first half got made.</p><p>When word of the production of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0034JKZ86?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=diykin-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0034JKZ86">"The Princess and the Frog"</a> got out, the controversy began. How would it get around the racial issues of a black would-be princess, living in the South in the 1920s?</p><p>The answer turns out to be easy. By doing what the Disney organization has always done best.Inventing reality. Ducking controversy. And making money. Case in point.</p><p>Released this week on DVD, "The Princess and the Frog" is a marvel of neo-classic animation and cultural avoidance. Set in New Orleans, the plucky Princess Tiana's traditional "I Want" song outlines the plot in all the detail we need. She's "almost there" to her dream of running her own restaurant, but not so fast. Her destination is changed by an encounter with an evil voodoo man and a hunky and oddly hued prince who apparently hails from the same "Pseudogravia" much beloved in Marx Brothers movies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/double_bill_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/double_bill_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney doesn&#8217;t want princess cooties</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/disney_princess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/disney_princess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/03/10/disney_princess</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The studio backs off the "p-word" for fear of alienating boys]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a good news/bad news item for those of us who have concerns about <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2004/11/24/princesses/index1.html">Disney princesses</a> turning little girls into bedazzled pod people: Since its last animated film, "The Princess and the Frog," got a lackluster reception, the company has decided to back away from the P-word. Says the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-disney9-2010mar09,0,7034175.story">L.A. Times</a>, "[E]xecutives at the Burbank studio believe they know why the acclaimed movie came up short at the box office. Brace yourself: Boys didn't want to see a movie with 'princess' in the title."</p><p>But why would you stop at, say, not making another movie with 'princess' in the title, when you could do even more to protect your business from the damning effects of girl cooties? There's more!&#160; "Concluding that it had too many animated girl flicks in its lineup, Disney has shelved its long-gestating project 'The Snow Queen,' based on the Hans Christian Andersen story." And just to be on the safe side, the studio has also "renamed its next animated film with the girl-centric name 'Rapunzel' to the less gender-specific 'Tangled'" and beefed up the male lead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/disney_princess/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/disney_princess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney princesses get a &#8220;Mean Girls&#8221; makeover</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/mean_disney_girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/mean_disney_girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/03/05/mean_disney_girls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A video mash-up sends Ariel and Sleeping Beauty back to the merciless halls of high school]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We always knew that Sleeping Beauty chick was a bitch. A self-described YouTube "nerd" who goes by Pinkwhig has mashed up the "Mean Girls" trailer to clips of classic Disney princesses -- and the result is a clever and remarkably spot-on articulation of the subtext that's always been lurking in those animated fairy tales. And Ariel should definitely consider calling her agent about starring in the Lindsay Lohan biopic.</p><p>
    <object height="340" width="460"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KQeTlxhhmEo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KQeTlxhhmEo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="460"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/mean_disney_girls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/mean_disney_girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

