<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Donald Rumsfeld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/donald_rumsfeld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No, Sarah Palin, Obama won&#8217;t release OBL photos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/sarah_palin_bin_laden_photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/sarah_palin_bin_laden_photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2011/05/04/sarah_palin_bin_laden_photos</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Proof" won't silence the right-wing nut-jobs who make up Palin's  base. Plus: Rummy flip-flops on torture!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is right not to release photographic "proof" that Osama bin Laden is dead. There's absolutely no upside: The lunatic fringe will still doubt the evidence, and gruesome corpse photos run the risk of creating a backlash against bin Laden's killing that doesn't exist so far.</p><p>"We don't trot this stuff out as trophies," Obama told CBS's Scott Pelley, in an interview to be aired on "60 Minutes" this Sunday. "We don't need to spike the football. Given the graphic nature of the photo, it would create national security risk."</p><p>Not surprisingly, one-time vice-presidential candidate and short-term Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin disagrees. She tweeted at about 2 pm ET:</p><blockquote>
<p>Show photo as warning to others seeking America's destruction. No pussy-footing around, no politicking, no drama;it's part of the mission <em>(sic)</em></p>
</blockquote><p>Who does Palin think is "pussy-footing" around? The president? Navy SEALs? In what world does the quitter from Wasilla get to determine "it's part of the mission"? No world we live in, thank God.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/sarah_palin_bin_laden_photos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/sarah_palin_bin_laden_photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>338</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When George W. Bush killed bin Laden: An alternate history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or: An exploration of Dick Cheney's recent daydreams]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Bush announces the news to the nation on May 24, 2006, immediately following the East Coast airing of the finale of "American Idol." He appears in military fatigues and, for some reason, spurs. Behind him, an oversize Osama bin Laden "Wanted" poster, with the word "LIQUIDATED" stamped on the terrorist mastermind's face. The camera pulls back to reveal that the president's East Room audience is in fact made up entirely of firefighters. The Marine band plays "Stars and Stripes Forever" as the president speaks, forcing Bush to address the room, and the nation, through a bullhorn.</p><p>"America has won the war on terror," Bush shouts. "Tonight, I am proud to say, Osama bin Laden is in hell." The president explains that the terrorist mastermind was "taken out" by American forces in Afghanistan, along with the entire senior leadership of al-Qaida. Crowds spontaneously gather in celebration outside the White House, with handmade signs ("THESE COLORS DON'T RUN," "LET'S ROLL") in plain view of cable news cameras set up beforehand according to a White House communications office suggestion. A professional-quality sound system blares Lee Greenwood. Then, fireworks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld attacks Bob Woodward &#8212; on Facebook!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/rumsfeld_attacks_woodward_on_facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/rumsfeld_attacks_woodward_on_facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2011/03/01/rumsfeld_attacks_woodward_on_facebook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking a page from Sarah Palin, the former defense secretary strikes back after Woodward blasts his book]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/03/01/how_rumsfeld_misleads_and_ducks_responsibility_in_his_new_book">This morning Bob Woodward let loose</a> with a fierce attack on Donald Rumsfeld's "Known and Unknown," the former defense secretary's 832-page exercise in covering his own behind. Based on his own reporting, Woodward pinpoints Rumsfeld's deceptions about his role in hustling us into war with Iraq. In a book filled with evasion and deception, Rumsfeld's effort to shed blame for the war is breathtaking. I recently watched him pretend to NBC's Andrea Mitchell that he was unfamiliar with the term "stove-pipe" -- as in the notorious term "stove-pipe intelligence," widely used to describe the way Rumsfeld's Pentagon funneled only the information that bolstered its case against Iraq to other decision-makers, and kept different intelligence players in the dark about what others were doing. (<a href="http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/02/23/6111142-dear-mr-rumsfeld-you-cant-un-know-what-we-know-you-know">Rachel Maddow's staff</a> later found that Rumsfeld had used the term himself.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/rumsfeld_attacks_woodward_on_facebook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/rumsfeld_attacks_woodward_on_facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld refuses to deny being a lizard person</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louis C.K. asks the tough questions as an ill-advised interview with the former defense secretary takes an odd turn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Rumsfeld's book tour is probably making him miserable. Here's a guy with deep contempt for the press in general subjecting himself to impudent questioning of his decisions, and this doesn't seem like a man who feels the need to justify his decisions. He even had to pretend to enjoy a discussion with Jon Stewart.</p><p>But, honestly, I don't understand what led him to actually call in to "The Opie and Anthony Show." I mean, there was some interesting, informative discussion of Rumsfeld's history and politics and so on. I think. But all anyone will remember <a href="http://wonkette.com/439328/donald-rumsfeld-refuses-to-answer-whether-or-not-hes-a-lizard-person">is that comedian Louis C.K. repeatedly asked Rumsfeld if he was a lizard person.</a></p><p>This is an edited version of the interview, as uploaded by Louis C.K.:</p><p>
    <object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dK8Y2nO_8TM?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dK8Y2nO_8TM?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart interviews Donald Rumsfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/24/stewart_donald_rumsfeld_interview_daily_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/24/stewart_donald_rumsfeld_interview_daily_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/24/stewart_donald_rumsfeld_interview_daily_show</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Highlights include: Rumsfeld's feelings about safety, Rumsfeld's feelings about honesty, Rumsfeld's feelings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald&#160;Rumsfeld <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-february-23-2011/exclusive---donald-rumsfeld-extended-interview-pt--1?xrs=share_copy">appeared</a> on the "The Daily Show With Jon Stewart" last night to plug his new memoir. While Stewart pressed for the inside scoops about the Iraq War and other unidentifiable skeletons in Rumsfeld's closet, the former defense secretary kept his cool. If you were unsatisfied by the made-for-TV edit, here's the interview in full.</p><p>
    <strong>Part One</strong>
  </p><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="295" style="font: 11px arial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245);" width="445">
<tbody>
<tr style="background-color: rgb(229, 229, 229);" valign="middle">
<td style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;">
          <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">The Daily Show With Jon Stewart</a>
        </td>
<td style="padding: 2px 5px 0px; text-align: right; font-weight: bold;">Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 14px;" valign="middle">
<td colspan="2" style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;">
          <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-february-23-2011/exclusive---donald-rumsfeld-extended-interview-pt--1" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">Exclusive - Donald Rumsfeld Extended Interview Pt. 1</a>
        </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 14px; background-color: rgb(53, 53, 53);" valign="middle">
<td colspan="2" style="padding: 2px 5px 0px; width: 445px; overflow: hidden; text-align: right;">
          <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/" style="color: rgb(150, 222, 255); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">www.thedailyshow.com</a>
        </td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td colspan="2" style="padding: 0px;">
          <embed allowfullscreen="true" allownetworking="all" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" flashvars="autoPlay=false" height="250" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:375197" style="display: block;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="445" wmode="window"></embed>
        </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 18px;" valign="middle">
<td colspan="2" style="padding: 0px;">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="100%" style="margin: 0px; text-align: center;" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr valign="middle">
<td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;">
                  <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/" style="font: 10px arial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>
                </td>
<td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;">
                  <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/" style="font: 10px arial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>
                </td>
<td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;">
                  <a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow" style="font: 10px arial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">The Daily Show on Facebook</a>
                </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/24/stewart_donald_rumsfeld_interview_daily_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/24/stewart_donald_rumsfeld_interview_daily_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld claims Saddam tried to kill his daughters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_daughters_saddam_bounty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_daughters_saddam_bounty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_daughters_saddam_bounty</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the Bush administration did nothing to protect the defense secretary's family]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the single strangest moment in Donald Rumsfeld's new memoir is an episode in October 2003 in which he is informed by CIA Director&#160;George Tenet that Saddam Hussein had, according to the book, put out a $60 million bounty on Rumsfeld's adult daughters. This was in the wake of the <a href="http://articles.cnn.com/2003-07-22/world/sprj.irq.sons_1_abid-hamid-mahmud-bodies-iraqi-national-congress?_s=PM:WORLD">killing</a> of Uday and Qusay Hussein by American troops in July 2003.&#160;</p><p>Here's the passage from Rumsfeld's "Known and Unknown":&#160;</p><blockquote>
<p>After his sons were killed, there was an intelligence report that Saddam Hussein was paying&#160;$60 million for his agents to target the President's two daughters and my two daughters for reprisal attacks. That threat report was brought up at an NSC meeting in October 2003. I acknowledged it, but went on with our discussion.</p>
<p>"You need to take this seriously," Bush said. He had received word that pictures of his&#160;daughters had been found in Uday Hussein's palace.</p>
<p>Tenet broke in, reinforcing the President's concern. "You took out Saddam's sons. They might&#160;well go after your daughters." Needless to say, I was concerned about my family, but there was little I could do about it other than encourage them to take precautions.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_daughters_saddam_bounty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_daughters_saddam_bounty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RummyLeaks: &#8220;The President said that the Senate and the House were a joke&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald and the president conspire to get him into the U.S. Senate, discuss Adlai Stevenson III's good looks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More true tales of Nixon <a href="http://www.rumsfeld.com/library/page/nixon-administration-documents">from Donald Rumsfeld's vast document dump.</a> Yesterday, we learned that Richard Nixon <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/index.html">"doesn't shoot blanks."</a> Today, we learn what Nixon thought of Congress, and how he planned for his favorite employees' futures.</p><p>In November 1972, shortly after Nixon was reelected, Donald Rumsfeld wanted to leave the executive branch and maybe run for office again. (He had been, prior to the Nixon administration, a congressman from Illinois.) He looked to have his eye on the Senate. First, though, he needed some good foreign policy experience -- he'd been stuck running the Office of Economic Opportunity, and then the Cost of Living Council, both organizations with mandates that Rumsfeld didn't agree with -- and so he had a meeting with the president, to discus his options.</p><p>Nixon was in a chatty mood, and Rumsfeld recorded his every thought, for his files.</p><p>First, Nixon was unimpressed with the entirety of the United States Congress: "The President said that the Senate and the House were a joke. There was no strength there."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld is worried about the caliphate, too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_limbaugh_caliphate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_limbaugh_caliphate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egyptian Protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//2011/02/08/rumsfeld_limbaugh_caliphate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former defense secretary channels Glenn Beck as he bashes Obama and kisses Rush Limbaugh's behind]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Donald Rumsfeld "Don't blame me" tour continued this week, as the former defense secretary hawks his <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book">book</a> "Known and Unknown." I've tried to ignore him. There's no news in his revelations, or in his <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/02/04/steve_kornacki_hardball">settling old scores</a> with Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, L. Paul Bremer and even George H.W. Bush. But Tuesday I couldn't help paying attention to Rumsfeld, as he went on the Rush Limbaugh show, kissed Limbaugh's massive ... ego, and cast his lot with the Glenn Beck Brigade, warning that radical Islam wants to establish, yes, a caliphate.</p><p>Here's what he said:</p><blockquote>
<p>We are up against a vicious enemy, the radical Islamists are there, they intend to try to create a caliphate in this world and fundamentally alter the nature of nation states, and we're reluctant to engage in the competition of ideas and point out what they really are and how vicious they are. This current administration is even afraid to say the word Islamist. And we need to fight. We need to be willing to say what it is and be willing to tackle it. And thank goodness for people like you who are willing to do it.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_limbaugh_caliphate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_limbaugh_caliphate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RummyLeaks: &#8220;The President then said, &#8216;Richard Nixon doesn&#8217;t shoot blanks&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld's contemporary account of a deeply weird 1972 White House cabinet meeting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Rumsfeld is promoting his upcoming memoir with a document dump, which is actually a pretty great idea. The documents <a href="http://www.rumsfeld.com/">he's released at Rumsfeld.com</a> aren't even limited to his tenure in the Bush administration -- they go back to his time in Congress, and then his work for Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. Rumsfeld's detailed report from a November 8, 1972 cabinet meeting is incredible. In great detail, Rumsfeld summarizes a classic, rambling Nixon monologue, performed the day after Nixon's landslide reelection.</p><p>"Rambling" does not even do it justice, actually. Highlights:</p><ul>
<li>"[Nixon] said 'politics is a game of inches' and that we had 49 touchdowns and they, the Democrats/McGovern, had one touchdown and a field goal -- the field goal being Washington D.C.."</li>
<li>"The President then said, 'Richard Nixon doesn't shoot blanks.'"</li>
<li>"Next week we should think through how to best serve, and that he will have the individual conversations with each. He said we are too busy doing things instead of thinking. He said that Richard Nixon does more thinking because of the discipline he imposes on himself. We ought to think through where the Administration ought to go. <strong>He said that with one exception he will have no appointments on Sunday afternoons because he has missed enough football games already.</strong>"</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Rumsfeld was right about everything, book by Rumsfeld claims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former defense secretary's memoir attempts to set the record straight on how great Rumsfeld was]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reviled two-time Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has finally written his memoir. It is titled "Known and Unknown," after a typically obtuse quote he gave to the press while mismanaging the "global war on terrorism." In his memoir, Rumsfeld is settling various old scores, and, obviously, trying to convince everyone that he is not responsible for the various awful failures and fiascoes that occurred at the Pentagon during his tenure in the Bush administration. Like, for example, the whole "Iraq invasion and occupation" thing. <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48749.html">According to Rumsfeld, he totally intended to do it right, but stupid President Bush wouldn't let him:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld says in a new book that he wanted to oversee the initial reconstruction of Iraq following the United States&#8217; invasion of the country but he was rebuffed by President George W. Bush.</p>
<p>"Bush didn&#8217;t cotton to the idea," Rumsfeld writes in his yet-to-be-released memoir Known and Unknown, excerpts of which were obtained by POLITICO.</p>
<p>"'What if we had a problem with North Korea?'" Bush asked, according to a scene that Rumsfeld said took place just before the 2003 invasion.</p>
<p>"'Well, Mr. President, if that happened,' I replied, 'I would come home immediately.' The President thought about that for a moment. Then he shook his head. 'No, Don, you need to be here.' I should have pressed the point harder."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld responds to Obama speech</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/03/rumsfeld_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/03/rumsfeld_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/02/rumsfeld</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former defense secretary challenges one of the president's assertions about the Bush administration and Afghanistan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don't hear much from former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld these days. He did come out of the woodwork on Wednesday, though, in order to respond to the speech President Obama gave the night before about the war in Afghanistan.</p><p>Rumsfeld released this statement:</p><blockquote>
<p>In his speech to the nation last night, President Obama claimed that "Commanders in Afghanistan repeatedly asked for support to deal with the reemergence of the Taliban, but these reinforcements did not arrive." Such a bald misstatement, at least as it pertains to the period I served as Secretary of Defense, deserves a response.</p>
<p>I am not aware of a single request of that nature between 2001 and 2006. If any such requests occurred, "repeated" or not, the White House should promptly make them public. The President's assertion does a disservice to the truth and, in particular, to the thousands of men and women in uniform who have fought, served and sacrificed in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>In the interest of better understanding the President's announcement last night, I suggest that the Congress review the President&#8217;s assertion in the forthcoming debate and determine exactly what requests were made, who made them, and where and why in the chain of command they were denied.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/03/rumsfeld_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/03/rumsfeld_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld order allowed bin Laden&#8217;s escape</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/bin_laden_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/bin_laden_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/11/30/bin_laden</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Senate report says that American military leadership refused reinforcements to block al-Qaida leader's path]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Osama bin Laden gave American troops the slip in the early days of the Afghanistan war, it seemed reasonable to give the benefit of the doubt to American military leadership. Tora Bora, the cave complex where the al-Qaida chief had been hiding, is situated in some of the most impassable mountain terrain on the planet. American troops had little experience in the region or local connections, and it was winter to boot. Though they won the battle, catching one particular guy in that kind of scenario was never going to be an easy job.</p><p>But a new <a href="http://foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Tora_Bora_Report.pdf">report</a> commissioned by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee shows that, in fact, the U.S. military may have had bin Laden in its grasp, and decided that dropping the net was too risky a proposition. The study, released Monday, is titled &#8220;Tora Bora revisited: how we failed to get Bin Laden and why it matters today.&#8221; According to the report, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld turned down requests for a larger American troop presence to block escape routes from Tora Bora.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/bin_laden_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/bin_laden_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush officials: Where are they now?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/22/bush_officials/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/22/bush_officials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/06/22/bush_officials</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unemployment rate is high around the country -- but not for former Bush officials. A guide to who's cashing in]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In May, the U.S. economy <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2009/06/01/daily62.html">lost</a> 345,000 nonfarm jobs, pushing the unemployment rate from 8.9 percent to 9.4 percent. According to official statistics, 14.5 million Americans are now looking for work and, as a recent <a href="http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2009/06/08/another-jobless-recovery/">headline</a> at Time.com put it, "The jobs aren't coming back anytime soon." In fact, a team of economists at the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank recently <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN0832136320090608">reported</a> that "the level of labor market slack could be higher by the end of 2009 than at any other time in the post-World War Two period."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/22/bush_officials/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/22/bush_officials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CIA&#8217;s secret history of psychological torture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/11/mccoy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/11/mccoy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Ghraib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/06/11/mccoy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throughout the Cold War, the agency outsourced abuse to other nations. Will Obama put us back on this path? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If, like me, you've been following America's torture policies not just for the last few years but for decades, you can't help but experience that eerie feeling of d&#233;j&#224; vu these days. With the departure of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney from Washington and the arrival of Barack Obama, it may just be back to the future when it comes to torture policy, a turn away from a dark, do-it-yourself ethos and a return to the outsourcing of torture that went on, with the support of both Democrats and Republicans, in the Cold War years.</p><p>Like Chile after the regime of General Augusto Pinochet or the Philippines after the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos, Washington after Bush is now trapped in the painful politics of impunity. Unlike anything our allies have experienced, however, for Washington, and so for the rest of us, this may prove a political crisis without end or exit.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/11/mccoy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/11/mccoy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld denying GQ report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/20/rumsfeld_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/20/rumsfeld_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/05/19/rumsfeld</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Through an aide, the former defense secretary says he wasn't responsible for briefings that featured Biblical quotations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Through a spokesman, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has responded to <a href="http://men.style.com/gq/features/landing?id=content_9217">GQ's story</a> about his tenure in the Bush administration. In an e-mail to reporters, Keith Urbahn took issue with reporter Robert Draper's contention that Rumsfeld played a part in producing intelligence briefing cover sheets for the president that featured Biblical quotations along with images of American troops in the field:</p><blockquote>
<p>The slides in the "World Intelligence Update" were prepared on a daily basis by military personnel serving on the Joint Staff, which reported to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, not the Secretary of Defense. The report was briefed regularly to senior military officials in the Pentagon - only occasionally to the Secretary of Defense and not to the President of the United States.</p>
<p>Rumsfeld was fully aware that words and actions could be harmful and counterproductive to the war effort. It's safe to say that some of these cover slides could be considered in that category. The suggestion that Rumsfeld would have composed, approved of, or personally shown the slides to President Bush is flat wrong. It did not happen.</p>
<p>Given that Draper used anonymous sources for this charge as well as for the rest of the innuendo in his piece, one would think he might have at least done a cursory review of the facts. He might then have avoided being taken by people with an axe to grind. When Draper goes back and checks reality against his reporting, he might also check whether GQ is in need of a new gossip columnist.</p>
</blockquote><p>In response, Draper <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0509/Rumsfeld_disputes_GQ_report.html?showall">e-mailed</a> Politico's Ben Smith to say he's "thoroughly confident" in the accuracy of his story and has "nothing further to add."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/20/rumsfeld_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/20/rumsfeld_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld was even worse than you thought</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/rumsfeld_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/rumsfeld_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/05/18/rumsfeld</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report details the anger within the Bush administration toward the former secretary of defense, and shows how he hurt Katrina relief efforts. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is not a popular guy, and his tenure during the Bush administration isn't generally well-regarded. He even became the fall guy for Republicans' disastrous losses in the 2006 midterm elections, as then-President Bush very publicly <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2006/11/08/rumsfeld/">accepted his resignation</a> one day after the GOP lost control of both houses of Congress.</p><p>Now, though, a <a href="http://men.style.com/gq/features/landing?id=content_9217">new article</a> in GQ by Robert Draper is doing more damage to Rumsfeld's already-tarnished reputation. Veterans of the Bush administration, who'd apparently been waiting for the opportunity to unload on an old foe, dished plenty of dirt on the former defense secretary, and delivered some truly amazing images to go along with it.</p><p>On its Web site, GQ&#160;has published a <a href="http://men.style.com/gq/features/topsecret">slide show</a> of cover sheets that accompanied intelligence updates produced by Rumsfeld's DOD&#160;for Bush. They all feature images of American soldiers in the field, and biblical quotes. It was, apparently, at least partially an attempt to appeal to Bush's religious belief, but it also made other administration officials quite unhappy, in part because if they ever leaked, the images would bolster the perception, which the administration had been working to counter, that America was fighting a holy war against Islam.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/rumsfeld_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/rumsfeld_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 13 people who made torture possible</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/torture_25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/torture_25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Ghraib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/05/18/torture</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bush administration's Torture 13. They authorized it, they decided how to implement it, and they crafted the legal fig leaf to justify it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 16, the Obama administration released four memos that were used to authorize torture in interrogations during the Bush administration. When President Obama released the memos, he said, "It is our intention to assure those who carried out their duties relying in good faith upon legal advice from the Department of Justice that they will not be subject to prosecution."</p><p>Yet 13 key people in the Bush administration cannot claim they relied on the memos from the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel. Some of the 13 manipulated the federal bureaucracy and the legal process to "preauthorize" torture in the days after 9/11. Others helped implement torture, and still others helped write the memos that provided the Bush administration with a legal fig leaf after torture had already begun.</p><p>The Torture 13 exploited the federal bureaucracy to establish a torture regime in two ways. First, they based the enhanced interrogation techniques on techniques used in the U.S. military's Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) program. The program -- which subjects volunteers from the armed services to simulated hostile capture situations -- trains servicemen and -women to withstand coercion well enough to avoid making false confessions if captured. Two retired SERE psychologists <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/21/cia_sere/print.html">contracted with the government to "reverse-engineer" these techniques to use in detainee interrogations</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/torture_25/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/torture_25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>171</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://stream.luxmedia501.com/?file=clients/aclu/olc_08012002_bybee.pdf&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
<enclosure url="http://stream.luxmedia501.com/?file=clients/aclu/olc_05102005_bradbury46pg.pdf&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
<enclosure url="http://stream.luxmedia501.com/?file=clients/aclu/olc_05102005_bradbury_20pg.pdf&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
<enclosure url="http://stream.luxmedia501.com/?file=clients/aclu/olc_05302005_bradbury.pdf&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld: Architect of torture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/22/madden_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/22/madden_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Ghraib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/04/22/madden</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The secretary of defense began laying the groundwork for detainee abuse years before Abu Ghraib.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Donald Rumsfeld heard about plans to force detainees at Guant&#225;namo Bay to stand for hours on end, in order to soften them up and make them talk to U.S. interrogators, he made a joke about it. "I stand for 8-10 hours a day," the then-defense secretary wrote on Dec. 2, 2002, at the bottom of a memo authorizing military officials to use extreme techniques against prisoners. "Why is standing limited to 4 hours?"</p><p>As a newly released Senate Armed Services Committee report makes clear, the effects of Rumsfeld's cavalier attitude toward what the report calls "detainee abuse" -- and what international law would probably call torture -- didn't just stop at the military prison on Cuba. The techniques Rumsfeld approved for use at Guant&#225;namo oozed into prisons in Afghanistan and Iraq, undermining decades of U.S. policy about humane treatment of detainees and leading to some of the worst outrages of the Bush administration, including the Abu Ghraib abuses, which <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/abu_ghraib/2006/03/14/introduction/">Salon has covered extensively</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/22/madden_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/22/madden_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Torture started with Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/12/treatment_detainee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/12/treatment_detainee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/primary_sources/2008/12/12/treatment_detainee</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a two-year investigation, the Senate names names -- Bush, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Gonzales, Addington, Rice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The fact is that senior officials in the United States government solicited information on how to use aggressive (interrogation) techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees." That is one of the raw conclusions of a two-year Senate investigation into torture.</p><p>On Thursday, as the incoming Obama administration <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/08/04/obama/">is mulling</a> whether or not it even <em>should</em> investigate torture under the Bush administration, the Senate Armed Services Committee released the executive summary of its own investigation of the treatment of U.S. detainees. (The full report is still being declassified.)</p><p>The report is all about naming names, and the summary is stunningly frank in its conclusions, particularly in comparison to the passive language employed by most government investigations into abuse.</p><p>According to the report, the torture ball started rolling with the president and his Feb. 7, 2002, memorandum stating that the Geneva Conventions didn't apply to al-Qaida or the Taliban. The CIA and the Department of Defense began scurrying to establish their brutal interrogation regimes, while the White House and top Bush administration officials brushed aside legal hurdles and approved specific, horrifying techniques.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/12/treatment_detainee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/12/treatment_detainee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sympathy for Charles Graner</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/01/graner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/01/graner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Ghraib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/01/graner</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one from the Bush administration has been held accountable for torture. But the guard from Abu Ghraib prison is still behind bars, and his family wants to know why.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The detainee held on charges related to the so-called war on terror is clad in an orange jumpsuit. His wrists are shackled to a leather belt cinched tight around his waist. A short chain connects his ankles, so he can only shuffle down the barren hallways of the prison, escorted by a guard at each arm.</p><p>He has spent more than 29 months in solitary confinement over the past four years, allowed out of his narrow cell during some of that period only to stretch his legs, alone, for one hour a day. In solitary, he has almost no contact with other human beings. He is allowed no radio, no TV and, in a disorienting twist, no watch or calendar to mark the brutal grind of passing time.</p><p>With so little stimulation, the brain begins to work against itself. Prisoners in solitary have described delusions, even hallucinations. It can drive a man mad.</p><p>"Karma really is a son of a gun!" says Charles Graner, infamous as the torturer of Abu Ghraib, in one of several letters he has written me from Fort Leavenworth, Kan., where he has been incarcerated since his conviction in January 2005 on charges related to the abuse of Iraqi prisoners at the U.S. prison in Abu Ghraib, Iraq. "Add a couple of years, change the color of my uniform and I find myself in the same position."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/01/graner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/01/graner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>207</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

