<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is recreational pot use safe?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/is_recreational_pot_use_safe_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/is_recreational_pot_use_safe_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While 48 percent of Americans say they've smoked marijuana, researchers say it might not be as harmless as we think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-safe-recreational-marijuana"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a></p><div id="attachment_1352"> <p>Marijuana is more popular and accessible in the U.S. than any other street drug. In national surveys, 48 percent of Americans say they have tried it, and 6.5 percent of high school seniors admit to daily use. So it was not too surprising when two states, Washington and Colorado, became the first to legalize recreational marijuana in the November 2012 general election, albeit in limited quantity, for anyone over the age of 21. Activists expect that similar measures will soon win approval in other parts of the country.</p> <p>Some success with medical marijuana helped to pave the road to wider legalization of pot. Eighteen states and the District of Columbia permit possession and consumption of the drug for medical purposes. Doctors in those jurisdictions may prescribe cannabis to treat or manage ailments ranging from glaucoma—an eye disease in which the optic nerve is damaged—to menstrual cramps. <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=cancer">Cancer</a> patients sometimes smoke pot to relieve the <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=pain">pain</a> and nausea brought on by chemotherapy, and some people with the inflammatory disease multiple sclerosis rely on marijuana to ease muscle stiffness.</p> <p>Although many physicians agree that marijuana is safe enough to temporarily alleviate the symptoms of certain medical conditions, the safety of recreational use is poorly understood. Researchers worry that both the short- and long-term use of the drug may harm the body and mind. Marijuana's continued popularity among teenagers raises particular concern because the drug might hinder the ongoing maturation of the adolescent brain. Making matters worse, new growing techniques for the <em>Cannabis sativa</em> plant—from which marijuana is prepared—have dramatically increased the drug's potency. Some experts suggest that such high-octane weed is fueling a rise in cannabis addiction. Finally, although investigators still debate how the legalization of recreational marijuana will change road safety overall, studies indicate that the drug slows reaction time and impairs distance perception behind the wheel. Despite such evidence, most new marijuana regulations, for medical or recreational use, fail to account for these potential risks.</p> <p><strong>Weeded Out</strong></p> <p>Whether rolled into a joint or mixed into brownie batter, marijuana profoundly changes behavior and awareness. The primary psychoactive compound in marijuana, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), mimics the structure of molecules called endocannabinoids that the human body produces naturally. Endocannabinoids act on a group of cell-surface molecules called cannabinoid receptors that help to regulate appetite, mood and memory. Because of its shape, THC fits into these receptors, too. After all, jokes neuroscientist Giovanni Marsicano of the University of Bordeaux in France, “We don't have a receptor in the body just to smoke marijuana.”</p> <p>When THC strikes specific cannabinoid receptors, it triggers domino chains of interacting molecules in neurons that culminate in both unusually elevated and abnormally low levels of various neurotransmitters (the molecules that brain cells use to communicate with one another). The result is the well-known “high” of marijuana. Suddenly, the mundane seems hilarious, and ordinary foods taste delicious. People generally feel merry, relaxed and introspective, although undesirable effects—such as paranoia and irritability—are common as well.</p> <p>Marijuana also temporarily impairs an array of mental abilities, especially memory and attention. Dozens of studies have shown, for example, that people under the influence of marijuana perform worse on tests of working memory, which is the ability to temporarily hold and manipulate information in one's mind. Participants in these studies have greater difficulty remembering and reciting short lists of numerals and random words. Research has further revealed that cannabis blunts concentration, weakens motor coordination and interferes with the ability to quickly scan one's surroundings for obstacles.</p> <p>Such mild cognitive deficits may not endanger anyone if a marijuana user lazes on the couch, but it is a different story when someone takes that high on the road. In driving-simulation and closed-course studies, people on marijuana are slower to hit the brakes and worse at safely changing lanes. Investigators still debate, however, at what point these impairments translate to more traffic accidents. A 2009 study found an increased risk of accidents for levels of THC higher than five nanograms per milliliter of blood, which some evidence indicates is as impairing as a blood alcohol concentration around the legal limit of 0.08 percent. Typically one would have to take several puffs of a joint to reach such a concentration. Consequently, voters in Washington State have adopted 5 ng/mL as the upper threshold for drivers.</p> <p>Enforcing that limit presents a technical challenge, however. Unlike alcohol, marijuana cannot be detected with a relatively unobtrusive Breathalyzer test. Police officers would have to look for it in blood—something that often requires a warrant. “There is currently no practical method for law-enforcement officers at the scene to collect blood samples from suspected DUI cannabis drivers in a timely manner,” says Paul Armentano, deputy director of the Washington, D.C.–based National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, which advocates the legalization of marijuana. Instead of using a blood test, Armentano says that police should look for poor maneuvering and the smell of pot wafting from the vehicle.</p> <p><strong>Smoke Signals</strong></p> <p>Although marijuana's immediate effects are relatively easy to monitor in the lab, the drug's long-term effects on body and mind are harder to determine. So far the results—which admittedly are subject to multiple interpretations—indicate the need for caution. In one recent study, clinical psychologist Madeline Meier of Duke University and her colleagues examined data from 1,037 New Zealanders. They found that people who began using pot earlier in life and used it most frequently over the years experienced an average decline of eight IQ points by the time they turned 38. By comparison, those who never smoked pot had an average increase of one IQ point by the same age.</p> <p>A reanalysis of the New Zealand data by Ole Røgeberg of the Ragnar Frisch Center for Economic Research in Oslo, however, suggested that the IQ difference could be explained by socioeconomic factors. People who start <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=smoking">smoking</a> marijuana at an earlier age are often less intelligent to begin with. Even if this is true, Meier says, her study shows that the IQ drop is greatest for those who started smoking pot as teenagers rather than in adulthood, indicating a worrisome cumulative effect regardless of intelligence. This finding, she thinks, makes it all the more important to discourage the early use of marijuana among teens.</p> <p>Increasingly potent marijuana of recent years may be driving a sharp rise in cannabis addiction among adolescents, according to a report released last year by the American Society of Addiction Medicine. Between 1993 and 2008, the average concentration of THC in confiscated marijuana jumped from 3.4 to 8.8 percent. Meanwhile hospital and rehabilitation center admission rates for minors abusing marijuana soared by 188 percent between 1992 and 2006. In contrast, admissions for alcohol abuse for the same group over the same period declined by 64 percent.</p> <p>In addition to tracking levels of THC itself, some researchers have focused on the dangers of lingering contaminants in marijuana sold on the street. Dealers typically sell cannabis by weight, so some use sand or glass beads to make their products heavier. Breathing in these particles over the years may inflame and eventually scar the lungs. An analysis published last year of data on more than 5,000 Americans did not find a decline in lung function among individuals who smoked joints two or three times a month over two decades. The authors emphasize, however, that they did not assess the effect of daily use on lung health. “Somebody should do that study if marijuana is going to become legalized and prescribed” more widely, says Mark Pletcher, an epidemiologist at the University of California, San Francisco, who co-wrote the paper.</p> <p>Some opponents of legalization worry that lax regulation of medical marijuana foretells even looser laws concerning recreational marijuana. In states that have legalized medical pot, current laws do not guarantee the safety or quality of cannabis products or standardize levels of THC. In Oakland, Calif., people can fill a marijuana prescription at Harborside Health Center, a massive dispensary with a strict quality-control system. Elsewhere in the state, however, people get their medical marijuana at mom-and-pop outfits or on the street. The next big round of ballot initiatives to legalize cannabis in states other than Washington and Colorado could happen as soon as three years from now, in the 2016 presidential election. Until then, researchers have plenty of marijuana health risks to weed through.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/is_recreational_pot_use_safe_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/is_recreational_pot_use_safe_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>209</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Punk, dance music and drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/punk_dance_music_and_drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/punk_dance_music_and_drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rave music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lures of ecstatic communion are strong, but so are the dangers of addiction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Reader,</p><p>Today, we talk a little about music subcultures, drugs and the human soul. I thought this letter was very interesting, but in trying to answer the questions it raises, I encountered my own limitations in knowledge and insight. I just don't know in detail how drugs influence crowds and vice versa, but do think social scientists can provide <a href="http://stat.asu.edu/~chavez/CCCPUB/Raves,%20clubs%20and%20ecstasy%20the%20impact%20of%20peer%20pressure.pdf" target="_blank">clues</a>. And there is also recent evidence of <a href="http://io9.com/can-music-be-more-effective-than-drugs-465249779" target="_blank">music's own curative powers.</a> My notes on it are a little dry, and a little hazy, and quite unscientific, but I am just a writer, not a scientist or philosopher. In the days to come, I'd like to write about my first experience of punk music and speculate about why it seemed so powerful and alluring.</p><p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I appreciate your column immensely and I have drafted many letters to you over the years which I have never sent -- as a sort of self-therapy to verbalize my frustrations. Sometimes the act of just putting it into words has helped me see my problems more clearly and enabled me to advise myself. Well done us!</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/punk_dance_music_and_drugs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/punk_dance_music_and_drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toronto mayor reportedly caught on video smoking crack</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/toronto_mayor_reportedly_caught_on_video_smoking_crack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/toronto_mayor_reportedly_caught_on_video_smoking_crack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rob ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group in the drug trade is shopping around a video showing Rod Forb inhaling from a crack pipe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A video, viewed already a number of times by journalists, is being passed around by a group of Somali men in the drug trade. It hasn't been made public yet, though, because it has a six figure price tag. Probably something to do with the fact that it reportedly captures Toronto Mayor Rob Ford smoking crack.</p><p>Ford is also known for conservative views and the occasional <a href="http://linchpin.ca/Blogs/Toronto-Councillor-Rob-Ford-Makes-Racist-Comments-Against-Asians">extremely racist</a> remark.</p><p>Gawker's John Cook -- who went to extraordinary, border-crossing lengths to see the footage -- <a href="http://gawker.com/for-sale-a-video-of-toronto-mayor-rob-ford-smoking-cra-507736569">wrote:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/toronto_mayor_reportedly_caught_on_video_smoking_crack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/toronto_mayor_reportedly_caught_on_video_smoking_crack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He made me his drug mule</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/he_made_me_his_drug_mule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/he_made_me_his_drug_mule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty years after I almost went to jail, I found the guy responsible on Facebook -- and something amazing happened]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook has been used to find ex-lovers, childhood BFFs or the one who got away.</p><p>I used it to find the guy who, without my consent, made me his drug mule.</p><p>It was 1989, long before Israelis were involved in the international ecstasy trade. I was a University of California, Santa Cruz, student in need of a break. My plan was hardly original: Go to Israel, live on a kibbutz, learn some Hebrew.</p><p>Before leaving, I attended a Jerry Garcia Band show at the Greek Theatre in Berkeley. After the show, my friend and I got a ride back to Santa Cruz with some random guys, one of whom was Israeli. When I mentioned I was going to Israel in a few days, he asked if I would take a birthday present to mail to a friend. It was already late.</p><p>Given my strong Israeli-dar, I knew he would do no harm to Israel. What I failed to consider was whether he would cause any harm to me. He told me it was jewelry. He wrote his name and return address in Israel on the back of the envelope, and his friend’s on the front.</p><p>My mom was adamant that I not take it. <em>Duh</em>. But I was 20. I believed that my fellow Deadhead and Jew could be trusted; he was a brother.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/he_made_me_his_drug_mule/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/he_made_me_his_drug_mule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA lets drugs approved on fraudulent research stay on market</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/fda_lets_drugs_approved_on_fraudulent_research_stay_on_market_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/fda_lets_drugs_approved_on_fraudulent_research_stay_on_market_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Painkillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The drugs in question include sophisticated chemotherapy compounds and addictive prescription painkillers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a> On the morning of May 3, 2010, three agents of the Food and Drug Administration descended upon the Houston office of Cetero Research, a firm that conducted research for drug companies worldwide.</p><p>Lead agent Patrick Stone, now retired from the FDA, had visited the Houston lab many times over the previous decade for routine inspections. This time was different. His team was there to investigate a former employee's allegation that the company had tampered with records and manipulated test data.<span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"> </span></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/fda_lets_drugs_approved_on_fraudulent_research_stay_on_market_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/fda_lets_drugs_approved_on_fraudulent_research_stay_on_market_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going green at California&#8217;s first pot farmers&#8217; market</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/go_green_at_californias_first_pot_farmers_market_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/go_green_at_californias_first_pot_farmers_market_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Farmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You won't find homemade apple pie at the Organicann Harvest Market, but you'll most likely leave pretty baked]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://modernfarmer.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/logo-e1365631563680.png" alt="Modern Farmer" align="left" /></a> Northern California’s first pot farmers’ market is like most other farmers’ markets, except you buy weed instead of kale and there’s the possibility you’ll go to prison – which gives visits to the <a href="http://www.organicann.com/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&amp;Itemid=189&amp;extmode=view&amp;extid=2&amp;lang=en">Organicann Harvest Market</a> in Sonoma County a bit of an edge this chilly morning.</p><p>Driving through Sonoma’s famed pastures and rolling vineyards, I note billboards advertising casinos and hydroponics — a favored tool for cultivating pot indoors. This is pot country as much as wine country. Marijuana is the<a href="http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/library/studies/nc/nc1b.htm"> second most-popular intoxicant</a> in the world (after alcohol) and largely legal in the Golden State <a href="http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/state-medical-marijuana-laws.aspx">thanks to 1996 and 2003 laws</a> that allow its use for medicinal purposes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/go_green_at_californias_first_pot_farmers_market_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/go_green_at_californias_first_pot_farmers_market_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prescription pill epidemic has spiraled out of control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/prescription_pill_epidemic_has_spiraled_out_of_control_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/prescription_pill_epidemic_has_spiraled_out_of_control_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prescription drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OxyContin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxycodone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The death of a West. Va. sheriff should persuade the federal government to fighting this blight ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>In the small coal towns of southern West Virginia, the poorest patch of Appalachia, the police blotters these days read like big-city tabloid fodder. Last month, a 23-year-old man received up to 25 years in prison for wheeling a quadriplegic to a house against his will, carrying him inside, beating him and stealing his prescription painkillers. That same week, a 25-year-old man was charged with child neglect resulting in death for taking three prescription painkillers and passing out, suffocating his one-month-old son in his arms. The child's 21-year-old mother was charged as an accomplice.</p><p>A couple of weeks ago, the manager of a pain clinic in the Mingo County seat of Williamson (nickname “Pilliamson”) pleaded guilty to “reluctantly selling drug prescriptions illegally”--abetting doctors in writing scripts for thousands of prescription pill addicts. “Patients” would line up at the clinic before it opened, like bargain shoppers at a Black Friday Christmas sale. And now, as the nation knows, the Mingo County sheriff is dead, shot at point-blank range as he sat in his car eating a sandwich.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/prescription_pill_epidemic_has_spiraled_out_of_control_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/prescription_pill_epidemic_has_spiraled_out_of_control_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the Supreme Court hike drug prices?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/can_the_supreme_court_hike_drug_prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/can_the_supreme_court_hike_drug_prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the industry uses the high court to allow bribery, evade the FDA, and boost medicine prices 5 times their cost]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court oral arguments on marriage equality deserved all the attention they received -- but it's another case heard this week that will affect even more people over the course of their lifetimes. And it could cost Americans millions in prescription drug bills.</p><p>The case falls within a sadly predictable continuum for the Roberts Court, which virtually always sides with the corporate litigant over the government or individual. This time, the arguments in FTC v. Actavis revolve around an insidious tactic common to the nation’s largest drug companies, and known as “pay for delay.” As a result of the likely ruling in this case<em>,</em> drug companies will be able to charge consumers as much as five times the potential cost of their products. And both government regulators and consumers will watch helplessly as pharmaceutical companies bribe generic drug makers to retain their exclusive holds on the lifesaving medicines we all inevitably require.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/can_the_supreme_court_hike_drug_prices/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/can_the_supreme_court_hike_drug_prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS: No sniffs without a warrant</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/scotus_no_sniffs_without_a_warrant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/scotus_no_sniffs_without_a_warrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniffer dogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court ruled police need a warrant to investigate private property and its surroundings with sniffer dogs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that police could only use sniffer dogs to investigate a property and its surroundings if they first obtained a warrant. "A police officer not armed with a warrant may approach a home and knock, precisely because that is no more than any private citizen might do," Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the 5-4 majority decision.</p><p>The decision upheld a 2011 ruling by the Florida Supreme Court suppressing evidence uncovered at Joelis Jardines' home with the help of Franky, a chocolate Labrador retriever with a strong record of sniffing out drug stashes. The <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/03/fourth-amendment">Economist explained </a>the justices' reasoning, the decision and its relevance to privacy laws more broadly:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/scotus_no_sniffs_without_a_warrant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/scotus_no_sniffs_without_a_warrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Losing my twin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/losing_my_twin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/losing_my_twin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excerpts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Cara fought drug addiction, I tried to help. But she slipped into darkness, and I was left without my other half]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In October 2001, something terrible happened to my twin sister, Cara. A capstone to some bad things in our lives that had gone before. That October, my sister was raped in the woods while she was out walking her dog. One of the consequences of the rape was that she was afraid to be alone. She needed me with her all the time. She asked if I would stay with her in Massachusetts, though she knew I had photography classes to attend in New York City. In my graduate studies, my only assignment was to photograph, which made it relatively simple to accommodate Cara. I selected her as my subject.</p><p>Cara refused to dress, so I made adjustments for the pictures that allowed for this. We wore identical long black cloaks. Cara buttoned hers over her nightshirt and pants, painted red lipstick on her mouth, pinked her cheeks. I copied her makeup, became her duplicate. We looked like old-fashioned harlots wearing long blank faces, in our long black coats. It was the middle of a harsh winter. I had a vision: identicals in the snow. I used the doppelgänger in the literary Gothic sense: landscapes were to describe the psychological state of the characters of our novel. It was easier for me to think of us as characters than to grapple with the truth of our new reality. I wanted Poe’s warring sisters, forever lost, women written with hysterical vapor. I wanted the fraction of history we owned.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/losing_my_twin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/losing_my_twin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elmo voice actor Kevin Clash sued over allegations of crystal meth-fueled sex parties</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/elmo_voice_actor_kevin_clash_sued_over_allegations_of_crystal_meth_fueled_sex_parties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/elmo_voice_actor_kevin_clash_sued_over_allegations_of_crystal_meth_fueled_sex_parties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin clash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crystal meth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheldon stephens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sesame street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are now four lawsuits against the former puppeteer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Months after Elmo voice actor Kevin Clash resigned from "Sesame Street" over accusations that he engaged in sexual acts with teenage boys, a Pennsylvania man, Sheldon Stephens, 24, is suing the puppeteer, alleging that Clash gave him drugs and engaged in sexual activity in 2008. This is the fourth lawsuit against the voice actor alleging sex abuse.</p><p>From the lawsuit, via the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/tv_elmo_was_breaking_bad_oFk5RPxvibmmKFk1hIPZKI">New York Post</a>:</p><blockquote><p>" 'On one occasion, a male chauffeur drove Clash and Sheldon to the chauffeur’s apartment, where they had a crystal meth sex party,' said the lawsuit, filed in a Pennsylvania federal court.</p> <p>'While in the apartment, Clash smoked crystal meth while engaging in sexual activity with Sheldon.' "</p></blockquote><p>The lawsuit comes after Stephens, the first man to publicly accuse Clash of sexual abuse late last year, later recanted his accusation and signed a statement saying that he had "an adult consensual relationship" with Clash. Stephens is stepping forward now to "save other children."</p><p>“It disgusted me inside because I knew what had happened to me,” he said. “That motivated me and my parents to reach out to ‘Sesame Street’ and kind of warn them against Kevin Clash and about him potentially harming other children."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/elmo_voice_actor_kevin_clash_sued_over_allegations_of_crystal_meth_fueled_sex_parties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/elmo_voice_actor_kevin_clash_sued_over_allegations_of_crystal_meth_fueled_sex_parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your tap water is probably laced with antidepressants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/your_tap_water_is_probably_laced_with_anti_depressants_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/your_tap_water_is_probably_laced_with_anti_depressants_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSRIs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-depressants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Water supplies in urban areas often contain trace amounts of SSRIs -- much to the chagrin of environmentalists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" /></a> The idea that we’re being unwittingly drugged when we drink a glass of ordinary tap water smacks of dystopian science fiction or political conspiracy theory. Accusations that Communists were spiking America’s water with sedatives—under the cover of the federally instituted fluoridation program—were such a staple of Cold War–era paranoia that Stanley Kubrick satirized it in his 1964 masterpiece, <em>Dr. Strangelove.</em> While such fear-mongering may seem quaint, what’s truly ironic is that Americans today are consuming prescription drugs—including addictive psychoactive ones—via the water supply. Who knew?</p><p>There’s a good chance that if you live in an urban area, your tap water is laced with tiny amounts of antidepressants (mostly SSRIs like Prozac and Effexor), benzodiazepines (like Klonopin, used to reduce symptoms of substance withdrawal) and anticonvulsants (like Topomax, used to treat addiction to alcohol, nicotine, food and even cocaine and crystal meth). Such are the implications of environmental studies that have been leaking out over the past decade. Whether or not this psychoactive waste has any effect on the human nervous system remains unclear, but when such pharmaceuticals are introduced into the ecosystem, the fallout for other species is demonstrable—and potentially dire.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/your_tap_water_is_probably_laced_with_anti_depressants_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/your_tap_water_is_probably_laced_with_anti_depressants_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was an ex-girlfriend trying to out Whitney Houston?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/whitney_houston_had_even_more_drama_than_we_knew/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/whitney_houston_had_even_more_drama_than_we_knew/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitney Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cissy Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Information Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FBI released decades' old files: The singer was allegedly being blackmailed by a "friend"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if it weren't enough that she had an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/cissy_houston_will_never_be_a_pflag_parent/">overbearing mother</a> who shooed away her best friend (and possible girlfriend), an erratic husband, and an out-of-control drug problem, the troubled late singer Whitney Houston was also battling a crazed fan and a blackmail plot that threatened to expose personal details about her private life, it was revealed on Monday, when the FBI released and posted <a href="http://vault.fbi.gov/whitney-houston/whitney-houston-part-01-of-01/view">128 pages from its file</a>.</p><p>The FBI file on the cases — which were opened at the pinnacle of the Grammy winner's career — was released through a Freedom of Information Act request, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/05/entertainment-us-whitneyhouston-idUSBRE92402X20130305">reports Reuters</a>, documenting over a decade's worth of threats against the singer, from 1988 to 1999. The pages, however, are so heavily redacted — names and details — that they're nearly inscrutable.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/whitney_houston_had_even_more_drama_than_we_knew/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/whitney_houston_had_even_more_drama_than_we_knew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can an online market for meth, smack and pot win?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/can_an_ebay_for_meth_smack_and_pot_prevail_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/can_an_ebay_for_meth_smack_and_pot_prevail_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Internet marketplace for drugs called Silk Road is continuing to profit despite legal attempts to shut it down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a></p><p>ATLANTA — Senator Chuck Schumer called it "a certifiable one-stop shop" for meth, heroin and cocaine, "the most brazen attempt to peddle drugs online that we have ever seen."</p><p>That was in June 2011, just days after Gawker writer Adrian Chen <a href="http://gawker.com/5805928/the-underground-website-where-you-can-buy-any-drug-imaginable" target="_blank">outed the site, known as Silk Road</a>.</p><p>Schumer's outrage was palpable. He commanded Attorney General Eric Holder to shut down the clandestine marketplace.</p><p>But in the nearly two years that have passed, that apparently hasn't happened.</p><p>The site mysteriously disappeared for two weeks in November 2012, and its proprietor, alias Dread Pirate Roberts, went incommunicado from online forums. That led some to speculate that law enforcement had shut it down.</p><p>But the opposite now appears to be true.</p><p>Due to an explosion in popularity, Silk Road's infrastructure had to be rebuilt to accommodate new customers and security, Dread Pirate Roberts said in a post following his return. And performance measures were added to better protect users.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/can_an_ebay_for_meth_smack_and_pot_prevail_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/can_an_ebay_for_meth_smack_and_pot_prevail_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is porn addiction real?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/is_porn_addiction_real_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/is_porn_addiction_real_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A video reveals that compulsively watching porn can have the same effect on the brain as drug or alcohol addiction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" /></a>Pornography addiction deserves a little more respect, because porn affects the brain much like a drug, as illustrated by a new video from AsapScience (below). "The not-so-shocking truth is that pornography has profound consequences for the brain and acts, in many ways, like a drug," says the SFW video. It explains that viewing pornographic images can increase tolerance, while causing loss of control and a compulsive need to get more. Just like drugs, porn can rewire the brain's flow of the feel-good chemical dopamine, reinforcing the behavior until it becomes addictive. Some compulsive viewers may even experience withdrawal when denied their fix. This might explain why porn makes up 25% of all internet searches and is the 4th most common reason people go online, the video points out. Like any addiction, watching too much porn can create problems in "the real world," such as making it "difficult to be turned on by reality.”</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1Ya67aLaaCc?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/is_porn_addiction_real_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/is_porn_addiction_real_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug overdose deaths up for 11th consecutive year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/drug_overdose_deaths_up_for_11th_consecutive_year_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/drug_overdose_deaths_up_for_11th_consecutive_year_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13206052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal data shows that most of them were accidents involving painkillers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHICAGO (AP) — Drug overdose deaths rose for the 11th straight year, federal data show, and most of them were accidents involving addictive painkillers despite growing attention to risks from these medicines.</p><p>"The big picture is that this is a big problem that has gotten much worse quickly," said Dr. Thomas Frieden, head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which gathered and analyzed the data.</p><p>In 2010, the CDC reported, there were 38,329 drug overdose deaths nationwide. Medicines, mostly prescription drugs, were involved in nearly 60 percent of overdose deaths that year, overshadowing deaths from illicit narcotics.</p><p>The report appears in Tuesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.</p><p>It details which drugs were at play in most of the fatalities. As in previous recent years, opioid drugs — which include OxyContin and Vicodin — were the biggest problem, contributing to 3 out of 4 medication overdose deaths.</p><p>Frieden said many doctors and patients don't realize how addictive these drugs can be, and that they're too often prescribed for pain that can be managed with less risky drugs.</p><p>They're useful for cancer, "but if you've got terrible back pain or terrible migraines," using these addictive drugs can be dangerous, he said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/drug_overdose_deaths_up_for_11th_consecutive_year_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/drug_overdose_deaths_up_for_11th_consecutive_year_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting prescription meds right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/why_wont_the_media_stop_freaking_out_over_prescription_drugs_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/why_wont_the_media_stop_freaking_out_over_prescription_drugs_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adderall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OxyContin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13202942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If drugs like Adderall help some people and harm others, why do reports on the drug skew one way or the other?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media seems to have three modes of action when it comes to psychoactive drugs: intense promotion of advances and benefits; general disregard; and full-on panic about negative effects, including potential for misuse and addiction. During both the benefits and the risks periods, many myths and misinformation are disseminated. But between these bouts of euphoria and panic, there is little coverage at all, especially of addiction. This up/down/off pattern does a disservice not only to people suffering from addiction, but to those with other diseases as well.<br /> <a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" /></a></p><p>Right now, we seem to be moving from a period characterized mainly by disinterest into one of attention and fear. Though we’ve never returned to the peak freak-out of the late ‘80s and early ‘90s—in 1989, a Gallup poll found that Americans viewed drugs as the number one problem threatening the nation, eclipsing even the economy during a recession—we have seen brief but blinding spotlights on Oxycontin, methamphetamine and now prescription drugs more generally.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/why_wont_the_media_stop_freaking_out_over_prescription_drugs_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/why_wont_the_media_stop_freaking_out_over_prescription_drugs_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confessions of a pot addict</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/confessions_of_a_pot_addict/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/confessions_of_a_pot_addict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13203350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 13 years of daily use, I stopped smoking weed. But quitting only made me feel better about the drug]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My relationship with pot started off badly. I lost all my high school friends after self-righteously refusing to smoke. I preached at everyone until our friendships evaporated. “I know if I try it, I will like it too much,” I remember saying — perhaps the only smart, true statement I would utter for many years to come.</p><p>The hardest friend to lose was a guy I’ll call Kevin. Kevin got me off Ratt and onto The Smiths. He got me playing guitar, which continues to provide me with happiness and social adventures at the age of 39. Without Kevin’s musical influence, I surely wouldn’t have moved from Florida to my beloved New Orleans after college. I worshipped Kevin until junior year, when he began smoking weed and abandoned me and my antidrug bitching. That same year, Kevin’s parents bought him a very nice car, which he crashed while skipping school and tripping on mushroom with his new drug buddies. At the time, I felt depressed but also extremely right.</p><p>When I finally broke down and tried pot in college at the age of 20, I realized I’d judged it totally wrong. Judgments regarding weed never prove factual, since the drug affects everyone differently. Some people plant themselves on the couch with snacks. Others grow manic and suffer panic attacks. I think of weed as a relaxant, a simple inverse of coffee -- and not just because I smoked every morning for a long, long time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/confessions_of_a_pot_addict/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/confessions_of_a_pot_addict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>157</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the quarterback of the new anti-drug movement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/meet_the_quarterback_of_the_new_anti_drug_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/meet_the_quarterback_of_the_new_anti_drug_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Sabet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Sabet was a drug control adviser to three presidents and is now marshaling the counterrevolution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a tide of marijuana legalization seems to be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/why_congress_might_legalize_marijuana_this_time/">sweeping the country</a>, one man has stepped up to stop it and he came to Salon to make his case.</p><p>Kevin Sabet, who served in the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy in three administrations, has become one of the country’s most outspoken advocates against legalization. Last month, he joined with former Democratic congressman Patrick Kennedy to form <a href="http://learnaboutsam.org/">Smart Approaches to Marijuana</a>, which advocates a new “commonsense, third-way approach to marijuana policy."</p><p>But reform advocates have criticized Sabet and SAM as little more than a new face for the old regime. Rolling Stone called Sabet <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/legalizations-biggest-enemies-20130117">the No. 1 enemy of legalization</a>, warning that SAM “uses clever language to disguise what essentially remains a prohibitionist argument.”</p><p>"Kevin is just the latest in a long line of individuals dead set on maintaining marijuana prohibition,"  said Mason Tvert of the Marijuana Policy Project. "Kevin and his organization have crafted a clever approach in which they condemn the harms of prohibition while simultaneously advocating for maintaining them."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/meet_the_quarterback_of_the_new_anti_drug_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/meet_the_quarterback_of_the_new_anti_drug_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Earning less than your wife is bad for your libido</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/earning_less_than_your_wife_can_be_bad_for_the_ego_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/earning_less_than_your_wife_can_be_bad_for_the_ego_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breadwinners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13192565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research in Denmark finds that husbands of female breadwinners are more likely to use erectile dysfunction drugs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Ladies: Has your income risen to the point where you now make more money than your husband? He might insist he’s perfectly OK with that, but the medicine cabinet may tell another story.</p><p>New research from Denmark finds that, compared to those who continue to outearn their wives, men in that ego-deflating situation are significantly more likely to use erectile dysfunction drugs.</p><p>“Even small differences in relative income are associated with large changes in ED medication usage when they shift the marriage from a male to a female breadwinner,” a research team led by Lamar Pierce of Washington University writes in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.</p><p>Furthermore, prescription drug records suggest wives suffer “increased stress or insomnia when they are the primary breadwinner,” the researchers write. “These results are consistent with a broad literature suggesting psychological and sexual costs from men losing their traditional marital role of breadwinner.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/earning_less_than_your_wife_can_be_bad_for_the_ego_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/earning_less_than_your_wife_can_be_bad_for_the_ego_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
