<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Americans really feel about drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/how_americans_really_feel_about_drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/how_americans_really_feel_about_drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11797211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Almost exactly eight years ago, I wrote an <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/debunking-centrism">essay</a> for the Nation magazine looking at how terms such as "centrism" and "moderate" were beginning to be deftly manipulated to shape the parameters of America's political discourse. In almost every policy debate, these words were being used in with-us-or-against-us fashion to delineate what was -- and what was not -- acceptable. Through such linguistic propaganda over the last decade, America was gradually taught that anything called "centrist" or "moderate" was Good and Serious because it supposedly represented "mainstream" thinking in America -- even as "centrism" was being used to describe policies and politicians that, based on empirical data, increasingly diverged from the actual center of our nation's public opinion. By contrast, anything positioned in opposition to that branding was wild-eyed "leftist," "extremist," "ideological," "fringe" -- and most of all, Evil and Unserious.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/how_americans_really_feel_about_drugs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/how_americans_really_feel_about_drugs/">http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/how_americans_really_feel_about_drugs/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/how_americans_really_feel_about_drugs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/how_americans_really_feel_about_drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adventures in drug war logic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/adventures_in_drug_war_logic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/adventures_in_drug_war_logic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican Drug War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10292573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's time for an important lesson <a href="http://www.dialbforblog.com/archives/476/">in proper, civilized behavior.</a> Drug war soldier Gallant launders vast sums of money for the Mexican drug cartels. Drug war soldier Goofus expresses skepticism at the size and scope of this expensive and deadly boondoggle. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/03/us/officers-punished-for-supporting-eased-drug-laws.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;adxnnlx=1323097225-eQ3rkhAQAv3pcztu/tAgtg">Goofus gets canned.</a> Gallant is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/world/americas/us-drug-agents-launder-profits-of-mexican-cartels.html?pagewanted=all">the Drug Enforcement Agency.</a></p><p>Sorry, what's our DEA doing this time?</p><blockquote><p>Today, in operations supervised by the Justice Department and orchestrated to get around sovereignty restrictions, the United States is running numerous undercover laundering investigations against Mexico’s most powerful cartels. One D.E.A. official said it was not unusual for American agents to pick up two or three loads of Mexican drug money each week. A second official said that as Mexican cartels extended their operations from Latin America to Africa, Europe and the Middle East, the reach of the operations had grown as well. When asked how much money had been laundered as a part of the operations, the official would only say, “A lot.”</p>
<p>“If you’re going to get into the business of laundering money,” the official added, “then you have to be able to launder money.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/adventures_in_drug_war_logic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/adventures_in_drug_war_logic/">http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/adventures_in_drug_war_logic/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/adventures_in_drug_war_logic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/adventures_in_drug_war_logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On &#8220;Weed Wars,&#8221; drug clichés go up in smoke</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/on_weed_wars_drug_cliches_go_up_in_smoke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/on_weed_wars_drug_cliches_go_up_in_smoke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10265478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"I run a family business, and the business is cannabis," says <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/weed-wars/steve-deangelo.html">Steve D'Angelo</a>, a central character in Discovery's new series "<a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/weed-wars/">Weed Wars</a>" and the co-founder and executive director of Oakland's Harborside Health Center, which distributes medical marijuana to almost 100,000 customers. D'Angelo's matter-of-fact statement sums up the tone of this series, which treats the Harborside Heath Center as just another family-owned (albeit nonprofit) business, ultimately not too different from a veterinary clinic, a hair salon or a tattoo parlor.</p><p>Well, OK, there is one major difference: Although the clinic's main product can be sold legally to any California resident with a medical permit to buy it, the federal government still considers marijuana a Schedule 1 narcotic, as dangerous to the republic as crack cocaine. That means that in addition to the usual entrepreneurial headaches, D'Angelo and his brother Andrew, the clinic's general manager, live in fear of a massive bust by the DEA on whatever pretext -- a catastrophe that would wipe out everything they've built.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/on_weed_wars_drug_cliches_go_up_in_smoke/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I run a family business, and the business is cannabis,&#8221; says <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/weed-wars/steve-deangelo.html">Steve D&#8217;Angelo</a>, a central character in Discovery&#8217;s new series &#8220;<a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/weed-wars/">Weed Wars</a>&#8221; and the co-founder and executive director of Oakland&#8217;s Harborside Health Center, which distributes medical marijuana to almost 100,000 customers. D&#8217;Angelo&#8217;s matter-of-fact statement sums up the tone of this series, which treats the Harborside Heath Center as just another family-owned (albeit nonprofit) business, ultimately not too different from a veterinary clinic, a hair salon or a tattoo parlor.</p><p>Well, OK, there is one major difference: Although the clinic&#8217;s main product can be sold legally to any California resident with a medical permit to buy it, the federal government still considers marijuana a Schedule 1 narcotic, as dangerous to the republic as crack cocaine. That means that in addition to the usual entrepreneurial headaches, D&#8217;Angelo and his brother Andrew, the clinic&#8217;s general manager, live in fear of a massive bust by the DEA on whatever pretext &#8212; a catastrophe that would wipe out everything they&#8217;ve built.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/on_weed_wars_drug_cliches_go_up_in_smoke/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/on_weed_wars_drug_cliches_go_up_in_smoke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt Gingrich talks about inventive new ways to punish drug users</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/newt_gingrich_talks_about_inventive_new_ways_to_punish_drug_users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/newt_gingrich_talks_about_inventive_new_ways_to_punish_drug_users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10270023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The thing reporters always loved about Newt Gingrich -- and the thing that led many of them to mistake his free-associative rambling for intellect -- is that he will just babble, at length, on any given topic, to any reporter who'll listen. So Yahoo's Chris Moody chatted with the unlikely GOP nomination front-runner <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/newt-gingrich-drug-laws-entitlements-campaigning-yahoo-news-152936251.html">at a Books-a-Million in Florida,</a> and Moody got Gingrich to go on for a while about drugs, for some reason, which I'm guessing is not at the top of the Gingrich campaign's list of issues to hit in interviews. (At the top of that list is actually "The Battle of the Crater," a powerful Civil War historical novel by Gingrich and William F. Forstchen, available now at fine booksellers everywhere.)</p><p>Here are Newt Gingrich's nuanced, compassionate drug policy ideas: Constant drug testing for everyone (especially poor people) and stiff "economic penalties" for use. (Yes, obviously, what poor people need are more ways to incur economic penalties and more barriers to either aid or employment. Newt Gingrich has so many IDEAS.) Also, the U.S. should be more like Singapore, where people carrying enough drugs to qualify for "trafficking" charges are put to death.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/newt_gingrich_talks_about_inventive_new_ways_to_punish_drug_users/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/newt_gingrich_talks_about_inventive_new_ways_to_punish_drug_users/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/newt_gingrich_talks_about_inventive_new_ways_to_punish_drug_users/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/newt_gingrich_talks_about_inventive_new_ways_to_punish_drug_users/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/newt_gingrich_talks_about_inventive_new_ways_to_punish_drug_users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;El Narco&#8221;: The drug war next door</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/el_narco_the_drug_war_next_door/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/el_narco_the_drug_war_next_door/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican Drug War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10206015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Among the many striking facts that journalist Ioan Grillo recounts in his new book, <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9781608192113%26">"El Narco: Inside Mexico's Criminal Insurgency,"</a> is that the Mexican city of Juarez became the murder capital of the world last year, beating out Mogadishu and Cape Town, South Africa, for per-capita homicides. Some 3,000 people were killed in Juarez in 2010, yet in El Paso, Texas, the U.S. city right across the river -- almost a literal stone's throw away -- there were only five murders.</p><p>Some would say this proves that better law enforcement is all Mexico needs to end the drug-cartel violence currently drenching its northern states in blood. Or maybe, as Grillo suggests, it merely shows that when the cartels and their associates want to kill someone in El Paso, they first take their victim across the border where, chances are, the murder will never be properly investigated.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/el_narco_the_drug_war_next_door/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/el_narco_the_drug_war_next_door/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/el_narco_the_drug_war_next_door/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/el_narco_the_drug_war_next_door/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/el_narco_the_drug_war_next_door/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our militarized police forces</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/our_militarized_police_forces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/our_militarized_police_forces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10179807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Atlantic <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/11/cops-with-machine-guns-how-the-war-on-terror-has-militarized-the-police/248047/#">has a good piece</a> on one of those subjects that I am slightly obsessed with, the ongoing militarization of American police forces. As a New Yorker, I am accustomed to being greeted by cops bearing assault rifles bravely monitoring the morning commute, which is more than slightly jarring, but the depressing thing is that that sort of sight quickly becomes normalized.</p><p>As former peace officer and Iraq veteran Arthur Rizer and co-author Joseph Hartman write, the police arms race has very clearly spread well beyond the urban borders of the only cities to actually be targeted by foreign terrorists.</p><blockquote><p>Now, police officers routinely walk the beat armed with assault rifles and garbed in black full-battle uniforms. When one of us, Arthur Rizer, returned from active duty in Iraq, he saw a police officer at the Minneapolis airport armed with a M4 carbine assault rifle -- the very same rifle Arthur carried during his combat tour in Fallujah.</p>
<p>The extent of this weapon "inflation" does not stop with high-powered rifles, either. In recent years, police departments both large and small have acquired bazookas, machine guns, and even armored vehicles (mini-tanks) for use in domestic police work.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/our_militarized_police_forces/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/our_militarized_police_forces/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/our_militarized_police_forces/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/our_militarized_police_forces/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/our_militarized_police_forces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should teens be screened for drug use?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/should_teens_be_screened_for_drug_use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/should_teens_be_screened_for_drug_use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10160394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This just in: Teenagers experiment with sex, alcohol and drugs. But for the first time, the American Academy of Pediatrics now boldly recommends that adolescents be routinely screened for illicit-substance use and HIV. The policy statements suggest doctors <a href="http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/31/doctors-urge-hiv-testing-starting-at-16/">test kids 16 and up</a> for HIV in communities where more than 0.1 percent of the population has the virus -- regardless of whether the patient admits to being sexually active. It also states that doctors should ask teens about drug, alcohol and nicotine use at every visit. But while a routine HIV test is a fairly straightforward, judgment-free process, frank conversation is another one altogether. Are parents and pediatricians ready to get frank with teenagers about their recreational activities?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/should_teens_be_screened_for_drug_use/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/should_teens_be_screened_for_drug_use/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/should_teens_be_screened_for_drug_use/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/should_teens_be_screened_for_drug_use/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/should_teens_be_screened_for_drug_use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry: Elect me because I am incapable of communicating clearly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10160294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last weekend, Rick Perry gave a bizarre, rambling speech in New Hampshire that quickly became an "Internet sensation." It is sort of like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhDhDRvHaGs&amp;feature=related">BadLipReading</a> come to life.</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7M4gz97Y9W8" frameborder="0" width="450" height="335"></iframe></p><p>"This is such a cool state," Perry says, referring to New Hampshire, not "intoxication."</p><p>How to explain this? Perry isn't a great public speaker, but he's usually not a slurring, incoherent one. At a National Journal panel, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/11/booze-or-back-meds-explaining-perrys-odd-speech/247690/">Democratic consultant Steve McMahon thought perhaps Perry was drunk.</a> He sounds a bit drunk. But who gets drunk before giving a speech in New Hampshire? This isn't the Golden Globes, this is a presidential campaign.</p><p>Republican Charlie Black suggests a different substance:</p><blockquote><p>"It's odd," Black said of the speech. "I haven't asked anybody in Governor Perry's campaign about it. Look, he's got a back problem, maybe it was back medicine ... ."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s crackdown on medical marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10112784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in July, I <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana/singleton">interviewed</a> a drug policy expert about an apparent change in Justice Department policy that suggested a crackdown on medical marijuana -- which is legal in many states but illegal under federal law -- might be coming.</p><p>Now, with the <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/crime/archives/2011/10/us-attorneys-marijuana-dispensaries-in-california-arent-legal.html">announcement</a> last week by California's four U.S. attorneys that pot dispensaries will be targeted with harsh criminal sanctions, the shift feared by drug policy reform advocates appears to have come to pass. The <a href="http://granitestaters.com/candidates/barack_obama.html">rhetoric</a> from candidate Barack Obama about not prioritizing medical marijuana cases now seems a distant memory.</p><p>To learn more about what's happening in California, I spoke to Bob Egelko, a veteran reporter who covers courts for the San Francisco Chronicle and has been following the story.</p><p><strong>Starting with the basics, what is the medical marijuana law in California and what does it allow for?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/">http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/15/obamas_crackdown_on_medical_marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As abuse mounted, DEA boosted painkiller supply</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/as_abuse_mounted_dea_boosted_painkiller_supply/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/as_abuse_mounted_dea_boosted_painkiller_supply/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxycodone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10106339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An epidemic of Oxycodone abuse has struck America in the last decade. The number of emergency room visits stemming from non-medical abuse of the narcotic prescription painkiller drug rose by 256 percent between 2004 and 2009, according to the U.S. government's Drug Abuse Warning Network.</p><p>In March 2010, Washington state Attorney General Rob McKenna said his state was “losing more people to prescription drug overdoses in a typical year than to traffic accidents.” In Florida, the Medical Examiners commission found more than 1,500 people died of Oxycodone overdose  in 2010, a four-fold increase over the 350 who died in 2005. The supply of Oxycodone, says Jim Hall, director of the Center for the Study and Prevention of Substance Abuse at Nova Southeastern University, went “far beyond the legitimate medical need of the state.”</p><p>The epidemic is not likely to abate soon. The explosion of pain management clinics in Florida, dubbed “pill mills,” prompted the state Legislature last year to close a loophole that had allowed physicians to fill Oxy prescriptions on the spot. Authorities say a half-billion doses of Oxycodone and its generic equivalents were distributed in the state during 2009 alone. An unknown number wound up in the hands of “patients” who had come from out of state to have prescriptions filled by multiple pill mills, before driving home to resell the pills on the black market.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/as_abuse_mounted_dea_boosted_painkiller_supply/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/as_abuse_mounted_dea_boosted_painkiller_supply/">http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/as_abuse_mounted_dea_boosted_painkiller_supply/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/as_abuse_mounted_dea_boosted_painkiller_supply/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/as_abuse_mounted_dea_boosted_painkiller_supply/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The collegiate drug hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/university_war_on_drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/university_war_on_drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/2011/09/16/university_war_on_drugs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the firmament of celebrated Americana, there is Mom, apple pie, football and beer -- but there most certainly is not marijuana. As it relates to drugs, this bizarre culture has us implicitly accepting that people will inevitably use mind-altering substances. But through our statutes, we allow law-abiding citizens to use only one recreational substance -- alcohol -- that just happens to be way more hazardous than pot.</p><p>Such idiocy is the product of many variables. There's been interest-group maneuvering and temperance-movement hypocrisy. There's been hippie-hating rage and reefer-madness paranoia. And, most invisibly, there's been college.</p><p>Though little noticed for its role in America's selective War on Drugs, the university system has now become a key player shotgunning the oxymoronic "alcohol is acceptable but pot is evil" mentality down the beer-bong-primed throats of America's youth. To see how it all works, consider the University of Colorado.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/university_war_on_drugs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/university_war_on_drugs/">http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/university_war_on_drugs/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/university_war_on_drugs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/university_war_on_drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five pop culture items we missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/08/pop_five_amy_winehouse_drug_poster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/08/pop_five_amy_winehouse_drug_poster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Winehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/08/pop_five_amy_winehouse_drug_poster</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>1.	Best/worst casting of the day:</strong> The kids of "Jersey Shore" <a href="http://www.movieline.com/2011/08/blame-the-farrelly-bros-when-the-jersey-shore-kids-pursue-acting-careers.php">will be making a cameo in the new "Three Stooges" film</a>, but not as Mo, Larry or Curly.&#160; What sort of devilry is this?</p><p><strong>2.	Anti-anti drug poster of the day:</strong> Whoever made <a href="http://www.x17online.com/celebrities/amy_winehouse/amy_winehouse_drugs_poster_08811.php">this Swedish anti-drug ad featuring a haggard Amy Winehouse</a> should go to Bad Taste Jail.</p><p><strong>3.	Bros before other bros of the day:</strong> Tim Gunn recounts how he dumped his last boyfriend because he was a flight attendant and a friend told him <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/08/07/tim-gunn-on-his-last-great-love-affair.html">that would be "such a clich&#233;."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/08/pop_five_amy_winehouse_drug_poster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/08/pop_five_amy_winehouse_drug_poster/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/08/pop_five_amy_winehouse_drug_poster/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/08/pop_five_amy_winehouse_drug_poster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/08/pop_five_amy_winehouse_drug_poster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I gave up when I got sober</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/quitting_drugs_open2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/quitting_drugs_open2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/08/02/quitting_drugs_open2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was 20 and 45 days sober.</p><p>When I walked back into the house, I was in shock. It had been a month and a half since I had crossed through the threshold into the historic home that housed the ragtag group of people who had once been considered closer than family.</p><p>The living room looked nothing like the hazy recollection of nights and early mornings I had in my head. The couch that had felt like a throne sat sagging and filthy against the wall.</p><p>Cigarette ash was piled around the arms of the sofa. I glanced up the stairs, but was distracted by the dried dark brown handprints that were smudged and trailing the walls up the once grand staircase.</p><p>I know they weren't mine. But they were a grim reminder of what had happened behind my bedroom door at the top of the stairs.</p><p>In the next room, I found a couple who had been my good friends watching Judge Judy and smoking from my hookah.</p><p>"Is everyone still asleep?" I asked, but I was met with blank stares. It took them a few minutes, trying to focus on me to realize who I was.</p><p>"You came back?" asked the dazed man, Joe. His scruffy beard looked more ragged than I remembered. My eyes wandered to his exposed arms. The marks looked familiar, but the vastness of the bruises were a sad reminder of where I could have easily ended up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/quitting_drugs_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was 20 and 45 days sober.</p><p>When I walked back into the house, I was in shock. It had been a month and a half since I had crossed through the threshold into the historic home that housed the ragtag group of people who had once been considered closer than family.</p><p>The living room looked nothing like the hazy recollection of nights and early mornings I had in my head. The couch that had felt like a throne sat sagging and filthy against the wall.</p><p>Cigarette ash was piled around the arms of the sofa. I glanced up the stairs, but was distracted by the dried dark brown handprints that were smudged and trailing the walls up the once grand staircase.</p><p>I know they weren&#8217;t mine. But they were a grim reminder of what had happened behind my bedroom door at the top of the stairs.</p><p>In the next room, I found a couple who had been my good friends watching Judge Judy and smoking from my hookah.</p><p>&#8220;Is everyone still asleep?&#8221; I asked, but I was met with blank stares. It took them a few minutes, trying to focus on me to realize who I was.</p><p>&#8220;You came back?&#8221; asked the dazed man, Joe. His scruffy beard looked more ragged than I remembered. My eyes wandered to his exposed arms. The marks looked familiar, but the vastness of the bruises were a sad reminder of where I could have easily ended up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/quitting_drugs_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/quitting_drugs_open2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico says a top Juarez cartel figure captured</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/lt_drug_war_mexico_15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/lt_drug_war_mexico_15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/01/lt_drug_war_mexico_15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A former police officer who allegedly admits ordering 1,500 killings during a campaign of terror as a drug gang chieftain along the U.S. border has been captured in northern Mexico, federal officials said Sunday.</p><p>Jose Antonio Acosta Hernandez also is a suspect in last year's slaying of a U.S. consulate employee near a border crossing in Ciudad Juarez.</p><p>Mexican President Felipe Calderon said through his Twitter account that Acosta's capture is "the biggest blow" to organized crime in Ciudad Juarez since he sent about 5,000 federal police to the city in April 2010 to try to curb violence in one of the world's most dangerous cities.</p><p>Acosta, 33, was caught Friday in the northern city of Chihuahua along with his bodyguard, said Ramon Pequeno, head of the federal police anti-drug unit. Without offering details on the capture, he said the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration helped by providing information. Acosta's arrest was not confirmed until Sunday, just before officials displayed him to journalists in Mexico City.</p><p>Wearing a long-sleeve dress shirt, the short man with a cleft chin and thick eyebrows limped as he was escorted by two masked federal police officers to stand before the cameras.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/lt_drug_war_mexico_15/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A former police officer who allegedly admits ordering 1,500 killings during a campaign of terror as a drug gang chieftain along the U.S. border has been captured in northern Mexico, federal officials said Sunday.</p><p>Jose Antonio Acosta Hernandez also is a suspect in last year&#8217;s slaying of a U.S. consulate employee near a border crossing in Ciudad Juarez.</p><p>Mexican President Felipe Calderon said through his Twitter account that Acosta&#8217;s capture is &#8220;the biggest blow&#8221; to organized crime in Ciudad Juarez since he sent about 5,000 federal police to the city in April 2010 to try to curb violence in one of the world&#8217;s most dangerous cities.</p><p>Acosta, 33, was caught Friday in the northern city of Chihuahua along with his bodyguard, said Ramon Pequeno, head of the federal police anti-drug unit. Without offering details on the capture, he said the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration helped by providing information. Acosta&#8217;s arrest was not confirmed until Sunday, just before officials displayed him to journalists in Mexico City.</p><p>Wearing a long-sleeve dress shirt, the short man with a cleft chin and thick eyebrows limped as he was escorted by two masked federal police officers to stand before the cameras.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/lt_drug_war_mexico_15/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/lt_drug_war_mexico_15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I stopped numbing out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/30/life_without_abandon_open2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/30/life_without_abandon_open2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/07/29/life_without_abandon_open2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite memories is me at 21, wandering some city in Europe, in a blue dress, unwashed, drunk on vodka, hair full of sun and cigarettes, laughing with close friends who at night would turn into accidental lovers. We were going to live forever, of course, and we were always going to be drunk and it was always going to be summer. Then came the deadly winters that no one talked about; when you got too anxious and couldn't take it anymore, you went to the bar and you'd find a way to make it to the next warm season.</p><p>I first came to terms with being an alcoholic at 27. But even when I quit drinking, recklessness beckoned: I still did too much of everything -- staying up late, speeding on my bike, being careless with my body and my health. Even my pregnancy didn't slow down me down. I was the woman with the hugely swollen belly dragging buggies filled with grocery bags and potted plants balanced precariously on top of them. I would not rest; I had a beautiful garden that year.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/30/life_without_abandon_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite memories is me at 21, wandering some city in Europe, in a blue dress, unwashed, drunk on vodka, hair full of sun and cigarettes, laughing with close friends who at night would turn into accidental lovers. We were going to live forever, of course, and we were always going to be drunk and it was always going to be summer. Then came the deadly winters that no one talked about; when you got too anxious and couldn&#8217;t take it anymore, you went to the bar and you&#8217;d find a way to make it to the next warm season.</p><p>I first came to terms with being an alcoholic at 27. But even when I quit drinking, recklessness beckoned: I still did too much of everything &#8212; staying up late, speeding on my bike, being careless with my body and my health. Even my pregnancy didn&#8217;t slow down me down. I was the woman with the hugely swollen belly dragging buggies filled with grocery bags and potted plants balanced precariously on top of them. I would not rest; I had a beautiful garden that year.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/30/life_without_abandon_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/30/life_without_abandon_open2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Bennett: America has lost its way because Amy Winehouse got a Grammy three years ago</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Winehouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>William Bennett, conservative pundit and former Reagan Cabinet member, <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/07/27/bennett.winehouse.drugs/index.html">has written a very serious and important column for CNN,</a> about how the people who give away Grammy Awards should be ashamed of themselves for giving a Grammy to Amy Winehouse, three years before she died. Because her famous song about addiction was not socially responsible, and because she later died, the nominating committee should never have rewarded her considerable musical talent and songwriting ability. <em>The Grammys have blood on their hands!</em></p><blockquote>
<p>A good place to start learning the lesson is the Grammy Awards nominating committee. Did they have any problem or pause whatsoever in emptying their cabinet of awards for such a song or such a character?</p>
<p>Did one judge say: "Wait, I think we might be sending the wrong message here"? Or, rather, did they do everything they could to get her to the Grammy Awards even after she was barred from entering the United States? The answer is the latter -- and she appeared for her awards by video feed from Great Britain.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/">http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/bill_bennett_grammys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Amy Winehouse matters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/amy_winehouse_matters_open2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/amy_winehouse_matters_open2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Winehouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/07/25/amy_winehouse_matters_open2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As the news filtered across the social media sphere about the death of singer Amy Winehouse, I found myself strangely saddened by this loss. After all, wasn't this just another celebrity whose life had run amok in a very predictable fashion? But aside from the odd (and perhaps intentional?) fact that she died in her 27th year like so many other famous rock stars of the "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/27_Club">27 Club</a>" (including Kurt Cobain, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison and Brian Jones), something about Amy's tragic exodus from life struck me in a distinctive way.</p><p>Even without knowing the exact cause of death, there really is very little doubt as to what ended the life of the diva most famous for refusing to go to rehab. I'm sure my first impression of "Well I saw that one coming" upon hearing the news was hardly unique.</p><p>Winehouse had attended rehab on at least three occasions even though her bluesy, instant hit "Rehab" emphatically stated, "No, no, no." Multiple incidences of staggering intoxication during performances and well-publicized events of drug-induced insanity made it clear this woman was having serious trouble with substances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/amy_winehouse_matters_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the news filtered across the social media sphere about the death of singer Amy Winehouse, I found myself strangely saddened by this loss. After all, wasn&#8217;t this just another celebrity whose life had run amok in a very predictable fashion? But aside from the odd (and perhaps intentional?) fact that she died in her 27th year like so many other famous rock stars of the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/27_Club">27 Club</a>&#8221; (including Kurt Cobain, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison and Brian Jones), something about Amy&#8217;s tragic exodus from life struck me in a distinctive way.</p><p>Even without knowing the exact cause of death, there really is very little doubt as to what ended the life of the diva most famous for refusing to go to rehab. I&#8217;m sure my first impression of &#8220;Well I saw that one coming&#8221; upon hearing the news was hardly unique.</p><p>Winehouse had attended rehab on at least three occasions even though her bluesy, instant hit &#8220;Rehab&#8221; emphatically stated, &#8220;No, no, no.&#8221; Multiple incidences of staggering intoxication during performances and well-publicized events of drug-induced insanity made it clear this woman was having serious trouble with substances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/amy_winehouse_matters_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/amy_winehouse_matters_open2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;An Anatomy of Addiction&#8221;: Sigmund Freud, cokehead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/17/anatomy_of_addiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/17/anatomy_of_addiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/07/17/anatomy_of_addiction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas Meyer's bestselling 1974 novel, <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ISBNInquiry.asp?EAN=9780393311198">"The Seven Percent Solution,"</a> isn't mentioned once in <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ISBNInquiry.asp?EAN=9780375423307">"An Anatomy of Addiction: Sigmund Freud, William Halsted and the Miracle Drug Cocaine"</a> by Howard Markel, but any of Markel's readers who have also read Meyer's highly entertaining Sherlock Holmes pastiche will think of it often all the same. The novel "reveals" that Holmes' "Great Hiatus" (the three years between his false death at Reichenbach Falls and his reappearance in "The Adventure of the Empty House") was actually a period of recovery from cocaine addiction after his treatment by the great Viennese therapist Sigmund Freud. The founder of psychoanalysis brought exceptional insight to bear in providing this cure; he once abused cocaine himself.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/17/anatomy_of_addiction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/17/anatomy_of_addiction/">http://www.salon.com/2011/07/17/anatomy_of_addiction/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/17/anatomy_of_addiction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/17/anatomy_of_addiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could losing Dr. Drew make &#8220;Celebrity Rehab&#8221; even worse?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/celebrity_rehab_john_sharp_drew_pinsky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/celebrity_rehab_john_sharp_drew_pinsky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Rehab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Drew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/11/celebrity_rehab_john_sharp_drew_pinsky</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to "Celebrity Rehab," I'm no Dr. Drew apologist. I think his VH1 reality "hit" is the definition of exploitive and the opposite of therapeutic: By Drew Pinksy's own words, his patients all suffered from <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/03/09/celebrity_rehab_mike_starr_michaele_salahi">celebrity narcissism</a>, yet he claims to be helping them recover from drug, alcohol and various other addictions by putting them in front of a camera. He's essentially giving them Attention Crack while trying to wean them off the actual stuff.</p><p>And while the recent deaths of two of the show's alums isn't truly damning evidence (the drug and alcohol relapse rate in America <a href="http://www.caron.org/current-statistics.html">ranges between 50 and 90 percent</a>) it had the effect of turning the spotlight into a <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/27/jeff_conaway_death_drugs">double-edged sword</a>. His critics used Mike Starr and Jeff Conaway's overdoses to highlight how ineffectual Pinsky's program actually was, and suddenly the show's notoriety became its biggest problem.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/celebrity_rehab_john_sharp_drew_pinsky/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/celebrity_rehab_john_sharp_drew_pinsky/">http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/celebrity_rehab_john_sharp_drew_pinsky/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/celebrity_rehab_john_sharp_drew_pinsky/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/celebrity_rehab_john_sharp_drew_pinsky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crackdown on medical marijuana ahead?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Story You Missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Drug-policy reformers are worried about a new Obama administration <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2011-07-08-medical-marijuana_n.htm?csp=34news">memo</a> instructing federal prosecutors on how to deal with the growing number of medical marijuana dispensaries.</p><p>The Justice Department memo, sent to U.S. attorneys around the nation, addresses a central problem with the growing number of states that have legalized medical marijuana: The drug remains illegal under federal law, whether used for medical purposes or not. The new <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/59363477/James-Cole-Memo-Regarding-Medical-Marijuana">guidance memo</a> reiterates the illegality of medical marijuana and appears to encourage prosecutors to go after some marijuana dispensaries, particularly the large operations.</p><p>President Obama <a href="http://granitestaters.com/candidates/barack_obama.html">suggested</a> during the campaign in 2007-08 that his Justice Department would not prioritize going after medical marijuana. To find out more about the new medical marijuana memo, and for an update on the broader drug war, I spoke to Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, which lobbies for alternatives to the drug war.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana/">http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/obama_medical_marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>147</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

