<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Editor's Pick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/editors_pick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s so special about journalists?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/whats_so_special_about_journalists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/whats_so_special_about_journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiretaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisa amendments act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Media rightfully outraged by spying on AP – but what about government surveillance on non-journalists?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government's seizure of AP phone records has rightly been described by the news agency's president as a "massive and unprecedented intrusion." All those who care about a free and robust press, with protected sources, are justified in their deep concern and demand for answers from the Obama administration. But there is a caveat. It must be added to concerns about undue government surveillance on non-journalists too.</p><p>The AP spying scandal must be contextualized (as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/obamas_war_on_the_first_amendment_partner/">Kevin Gosztola pointed out</a>): This administration is waging a war on whistle-blowers and First Amendment protections. A creeping surveillance state is being codified, under which the Fourth Amendment is also desecrated and journalists hardly stand alone as objects of surveillance.</p><p>As NSA whistle-blower Thomas Drake -- one of a record six individuals to be indicted under the Espionage Act during Obama's presidency -- told me recently, this government's approach to security resembles a "hoarding complex." His point was borne out by comments from CIA’s chief technical officer, Gus Hunt, who recently explained the spy agency’s strategy for a broad surveillance dragnet in a New York speech:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/whats_so_special_about_journalists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/whats_so_special_about_journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESPN&#8217;s plan to kill net neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/espns_plan_to_bust_the_internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/espns_plan_to_bust_the_internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allowing the sports network to buy its way free of data caps on your mobile device is a very bad idea]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are someone who likes to watch live sports events on your mobile phone, then it is probably welcome news that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324059704578473400083982568.html">ESPN may be in negotiations with a big telecom company</a> to exempt its streaming video services from  caps that limit how much data mobile users can download. Watching the NBA playoffs on your iPhone, without any free Wi-Fi to rely on, is an excellent way to chew speedily through your allotted bandwidth for the month. ESPN, reports the Wall Street Journal, wants to ensure that viewers get to eat as much cake as they want (and, of course, therefore be exposed to as many ESPN-delivered advertisements as possible).</p><p>But if you're not an ESPN addict, you might do well to look askance at the news. That's the take of Public Knowledge, a consumer-interest Washington-based public advocacy organization that quickly decried the possible ESPN deal as <a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/fcc-what-net-neutrality-violation-looks">an obvious violation of the principle of "net neutrality."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/espns_plan_to_bust_the_internet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/espns_plan_to_bust_the_internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Facebook Home disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/the_facebook_home_disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/the_facebook_home_disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The people have spoken: Nobody wants to live in Mark Zuckerberg's gated community ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reviews are in: Facebook Home, Mark Zuckerberg's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/facebook_wants_to_steal_your_soul/">grandiose stab at totally controlling our mobile experience</a>, is an unmitigated disaster.</p><p>On Wednesday, AT&amp;T announced that it was <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/05/09/after-only-a-month-the-facebook-phone-is-down-to-99-cents/">dropping the price</a> of the HTC First smartphone, which comes with Facebook Home built in, from $99 to <em>99 cents.</em> Think about that: a new smartphone, priced to jump off the shelves at Dollar General. It's a great deal, but it is also hugely embarrassing for Zuckerberg.</p><p>A little over a month ago, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/who_would_anyone_want_a_facebook_phone/">I wrote that the only way I could see a Facebook phone making sense</a> was if Facebook planned to cut deals with the phone carriers to give the phone away for free. But such a strategy doesn't seem to be what's in play here. Best guess, no one wants to buy a Facebook phone.</p><p>For confirmation we need only look at the Google Play store, where the Facebook Home app, which can be installed on select Android phones, has now fallen to the No. 338 ranking in the category of free apps. That's 200 spots lower than it ranked just two weeks ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/the_facebook_home_disaster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/the_facebook_home_disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The changing facts in the Boston investigation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Important details like the suspects' weapons, NYC plans and the shootout keep changing. It's fueling conspiracies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the aftermath of massive, complicated crimes it's not uncommon for a bit of crucial information to be immediately put forward by police, only to be contradicted later on. While it's understandable that initial leads and assertions might end up being wrong in a dynamic situation like the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing, wholesale contradictions can encourage skepticism of the motives of those releasing inaccuracies -- as with initial, false reports that Osama bin Laden <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/administration_backs_off_tale_of_osama_bin_laden_using_wife_as_human_shield.php">hid behind his wife</a> when U.S. forces shot him. Another effect of changing details can be to encourage conspiracy theorists who latch onto inconsistencies, and to undermine trust in authorities.</p><p>Now, almost a week after the Tsarnaev brothers fought a rolling street battle with dozens of heavily armed police officers, we learned Wednesday night that they had only a single handgun, according to sources who spoke with <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/single-gun-recovered-accused-boston-bombers/story?id=19028841#.UXlD9itATag">ABC News</a> and the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/officials_bombing_suspects_had_one_gun_during_shootout_with_police_ap/">AP</a>, something that directly contradicts what officials had previously said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Reese to A.J. Clemente, stupidity keeps going viral</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/from_reese_to_a_j_clemente_stupidity_keeps_going_viral/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/from_reese_to_a_j_clemente_stupidity_keeps_going_viral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny Or Die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebecca Martinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Clemente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reese witherspoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael shannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention clueless anchormen, sorority girls and Oscar winners: Your careers are at stake when you screw up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clear up any confusion that you might have, not-terribly-bright person who may from time to time send emails or appear in front of a camera or interact with other humans: The cloak of invisibility is not yet a reality. We can all see and hear and read you here.</p><p>We, by the way, are your teachers and employers and future employers and law enforcement officers. But don't take my word for it. Instead, learn from the shining examples of very dumb and very public behavior in just the last few days, and then henceforth, I beg you, pause for just a moment before opening your mouth or hitting the "send" button.</p><p>The most recent unfortunate victim of a yawning gap in internal filtering devices is the newly unemployed A.J. Clemente. For about five minutes this weekend, Clemente was a news anchor at KFYR-TV in North Dakota. But in an apparent case of nerves not seen since <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7mp5u_broadcast-news-sweating-the-news_fun#.UXa54ytoRuo ">Albert Brooks perspired his way through the headlines</a> in "Broadcast News," Clemente obliviously kicked off his debut performance by looking downcast and muttering a short string of obscenities. He would later chalk up the mini-meltdown to fear of <a href="https://twitter.com/ClementeAJ/status/326256513641500672">flubbing the name of London marathon winner Tsegaye Kebede</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/from_reese_to_a_j_clemente_stupidity_keeps_going_viral/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/from_reese_to_a_j_clemente_stupidity_keeps_going_viral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margaret Cho: Babies scare me more than anything</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still don't know if I want children. Frankly, I'm not sure I ever want to love anything that much]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">I don’t have children, and I am not sure if I have wanted them or never wanted them. It’s weird not to be able to decide. Kids are great, and many of my friends now have almost-grown-up kids, like in their late teens and early 20s, and I see these tall beings I once held in my arms, and I am alarmed, amused, and I want to cry, just for the passage of time and how it grows us like plants. I think about how, during all these years they’ve grown up, I must have grown down. That’s awful to realize.</p><p dir="ltr">Korean children get a lot of fuss made over them, I guess because life was tough in the old country, and it was a big deal if you survived. There’s a big party thrown when you are 100 days old, followed by another when you make it to one whole year. My parents took a lot of pictures of me at these parties, although I don’t remember a thing as I was really drunk at both. From the pictures I see the cake, though — all these big multicolored rice cakes, each pastel stripe a steamed layer of pounded and steamed rice flour, not sweet like birthday cake but a delicious treat all the same. It looks like a chewy Neapolitan ice cream, or a gay pride flag made of carbs. It’s the best and I want it, but I think wanting that cake isn’t enough reason to have a baby.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game Theory: &#8220;Pure pop for nerd people,&#8221; the greatest unknown &#8217;80s band</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/game_theory_pure_pop_for_nerd_people_the_greatest_unknown_80s_band/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/game_theory_pure_pop_for_nerd_people_the_greatest_unknown_80s_band/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loud Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.E.M.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Let's Active]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Easter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I.P]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Miller, who died Monday at 53, crafted some of the '80s smartest and catchiest tunes -- and changed my life]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1. Silent Football</strong></p><p>The term “gifted children” dates back to the 1920s, to the unsavory, sometimes racist world of early IQ tests, but it took fifty years to find its niche: “gifted and talented” summer camps became widespread and self-sustaining during the 1970s. The Center for Talented Youth (CTY), sponsored by Johns Hopkins University, opened its doors in 1979: about 9,000 students, aged twelve to sixteen, now attend CTY on six campuses each summer. According to its official website, those students discover “challenging educational opportunities,” in Latin, mathematics, neuroscience, and so on. According to realcty.org, maintained by alumni, they learn an argot (“flying squirrel,” “CTY-S”) and a set of diversions found nowhere else, such as “Silent Football,” “a complex game involving an invisible football, hallucinations, and tattling.… One CTY-er solved a Rubik’s Cube on stage while reciting the first 200 digits of pi.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/game_theory_pure_pop_for_nerd_people_the_greatest_unknown_80s_band/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/game_theory_pure_pop_for_nerd_people_the_greatest_unknown_80s_band/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing is killing learning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/testing_is_killing_learning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/testing_is_killing_learning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race to the Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Child Left Behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Ravitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Core Learning Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standardized Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As public school children sit down to take standardized tests, educators explain why they don't work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's called a "prep rally." This week, New York public school students are taking their standardized tests, in line with the national <a href="http://www.edinformatics.com/testing/new_york_state/overview_of_common_core_sample_questions.pdf">Common Core Learning Standards</a>. Last week, the principal of my third grader's progressive, learn-by-doing school sent home a letter about the "overemphasis on assessments and the unintended consequences of using state tests to promote students and evaluate school," a letter in which she promised the education our students receive there "cannot be measured by a single test score."</p><p>And the next day, the faculty shepherded the entire student body into the gym to cheer for the students to "Do your best" and sing, to the tune of "Ghostbusters," that they were "test crushers."</p><p>The rally may have been a well-intentioned attempt to defuse students' pre-test jitters. A school administrator later told me, "It wasn't to further promote testing. It was just about increasing confidence." Our principal echoed the sentiment, saying, "We did a very intense test prep this year. We recognize that our kids were saturated and starting to feel overload. The kids seemed like they needed the let loose." And, she noted, "The idea of bringing a group together to garner enthusiasm is something we do all the time."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/testing_is_killing_learning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/testing_is_killing_learning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN&#8217;s Boston embarrassment: How a &#8220;scoop&#8221; turns sour</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/cnns_boston_embarrassment_how_a_scoop_turns_sour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/cnns_boston_embarrassment_how_a_scoop_turns_sour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN wrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon suspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN reported that a Boston bombing suspect was in custody, followed by Fox and AP. Here's how it all went wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 12:04 p.m., CNN's Breaking News Twitter broadcast that a "suspect" in the bombing of the Boston Marathon had been "ID'd."</p><p>[embedtweet id="324569129187168257"]</p><p>This scoop was credited to CNN reporter John King, who, as of this writing, is not on air. Less than an hour later, CNN declared there had been an arrest.</p><p>[embedtweet id="324582239134416897"]</p><p>Other news outlets chased CNN, with the Associated Press and Fox News reporting a similar story shortly after 1 p.m. in each case.</p><p>[embedtweet id="324583755350147072"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324584418196983809"]</p><p>But by 1:43, CNN had cited the Department of Justice and Boston Police Department in their claim that no arrest was made.</p><p>[embedtweet id="324593940223385600"]</p><p>CNN's tweets about the events in Boston today link to a <a href="http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2013/04/17/source-arrest-made-in-boston-bombing/">liveblog</a> whose URL ends "source-arrest-made-in-boston-bombing/." King's reporting for CNN, preserved in the liveblog, indicates that the police "identified a suspect based on an analysis of video from a Lord &amp; Taylor department store near the site of the second blast, and that video from a Boston TV station also helped."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/cnns_boston_embarrassment_how_a_scoop_turns_sour/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/cnns_boston_embarrassment_how_a_scoop_turns_sour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Molly Ringwald and Jane Monheit: The universe knew what it wanted for us</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/molly_ringwald_and_jane_monheit_the_universe_knew_what_it_wanted_for_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/molly_ringwald_and_jane_monheit_the_universe_knew_what_it_wanted_for_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Monheit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Except Sometimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Molly Ringwald celebrates her brilliant new album by talking Ella, Hoagy and motherhood with musician Jane Monheit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Molly Ringwald: Hi, Jane, how’ve you been?</strong></p><p>Jane Monheit: Good. Really busy. I’m in Georgia right now, in Savannah. We’ve been touring a lot.</p><p><strong>How much time do you usually spend in each place? </strong></p><p>Well, it depends. If it’s a club, a couple days; if it’s a theater, usually one day. This is a festival, which is a weird situation because we’re playing a venue that’s been created just for the purpose of the festival. I meant to tell you, I’m so sorry I missed you at 54 Below. I was not in town and I couldn’t make it.</p><p><strong>I’m playing the Iridium in New York May 8 and 9, but you’re probably not going be there then, either.</strong></p><p>I might, actually. I’m not sure, but I’ll come if I’m in town.</p><p><strong>But don’t tell me if you’re there, it’ll make me way too nervous. (laughs)<br /> </strong></p><p>I was nervous when you were at the gig in L.A. Whenever there are other singers in the room you really want to sound good.</p><p><strong>It’s funny, I don’t get nervous onstage when I’m acting. It kind of gives me fire and I very often think about the people I know in the house, but there’s something different about singing, in terms of confidence because I haven’t been doing it as steadily as acting. But you’ve been pretty steady just singing your little heart out for how long now?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/molly_ringwald_and_jane_monheit_the_universe_knew_what_it_wanted_for_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/molly_ringwald_and_jane_monheit_the_universe_knew_what_it_wanted_for_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show roundup: Immigration, guns and money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/sunday_show_roundup_immigration_guns_and_money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/sunday_show_roundup_immigration_guns_and_money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeb appeared on all five shows to realign himself as an immigration moderate. Ryan appoints himself budget sheriff]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the highlights from today's political gabfests:</p><p><strong>Jeb Bush</strong></p><p>Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush made a full-fledged assault on the Sunday shows today attempting to clarify his position on immigration. Last week he said there should not be a “path to citizenship” for undocumented immigrants, a view he expressed in his new book, “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Immigration-Wars-ebook/dp/B009UVYYVQ/saloncom08-20">Immigration Wars,</a>” which was written before Mitt Romney got thumped in November and the Republican Party immediately decided that its hard-line immigration stance was not going to fly given current demographic trends. On "Face the Nation," Bush <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57573437/jeb-bush-i-havent-changed-on-immigration/">calibrated</a> his stance to bring it more in line with mainstream GOP opinion or what mainstream GOP opinion could become:</p><blockquote><p>I haven't changed. The book was written to try to create a blueprint for conservatives that were reluctant to embrace comprehensive reform, to give them perhaps a set of views that they could embrace. I support a path to legalization or citizenship so long as the path for people that have been waiting patiently is easier and costs less, the legal entrance to our country, than illegal entrance.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/sunday_show_roundup_immigration_guns_and_money/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/sunday_show_roundup_immigration_guns_and_money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to do outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/how_to_do_outrage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/how_to_do_outrage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maureen Dowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Done right, Internet griping can shame Seth McFarlane and ruin Todd Akin. Done wrong, it's phony, Dowd-esque shlock]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been a banner week in near-universal opprobrium. I say <em>near</em>-universal, because in the department of backlash to the backlash, there are already claims that the Internet has merely emboldened the "humor police," whether it's criticizing Seth MacFarlane's Oscar <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_misogynistic_oscar_host/">hosting</a> or the Onion's supposedly brave <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_onions_vile_quvenzhane_wallis_tweet/">joke</a> about a 9-year-old girl. So let me offer a conditional defense of outrage politics.</p><p>Take the misogyny and bigotry on display at the Oscars Sunday, and everything that followed. Salon's Andrew Leonard may be right when he <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/twitters_unstoppable_humor_police_were_all_hate_watchers_now/">says</a> that "in our pre-Twitter past, we might have simply turned off the TV or switched channels once MacFarlane started singing his dumb song about boobs. But now we stay watching to share our hate!" (Wait, how can we <em>know</em> what people did before Twitter? Maybe I can put a call out on Twitter.) Sharing that "hate" en masse happens to be a communal experience, something that has its own virtues in this atomized, time-shifted age. But it also exorcises demons that without something specific on which to fix righteous rage, are suppressed or implicitly accepted by society. Everyday slights and institutional discrimination are hard to point out on your own. Watching them on a screen or finding them in a tweet helps make them visible.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/how_to_do_outrage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/how_to_do_outrage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>170</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The recession was her fault</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/shes_paying_for_wall_streets_sins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/shes_paying_for_wall_streets_sins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet Wall Street's scapegoat, the one person to get jail time for the most massive mortgage fraud in history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You remember Lynndie England. She was the Army Reserve soldier photographed at the Abu Ghraib prison giving the thumbs-up sign in front of a set of naked detainees. A lower-level reservist, she was among the few at Abu Ghraib who actually served prison time.</p><p>No officers who authorized and directed the torture and detainee abuse, either in that prison, at Guantanamo Bay or anywhere around the world, ever faced trial. But Lynndie England became a symbol for the sorry state of the rule of law in America, where a few small “bad apples” get held to account, and the higher-ups who devised and directed the criminal activity get off scot-free.</p><p>There’s a Lynndie England for the financial crisis, too.</p><p>Meet Lorraine O. Brown, an individual singled out for actual jail time for her role in the massive mortgage document fraud that plagued this nation. Like England, she stands alone among the multitudes of fraudsters, including those at the highest reaches of the financial industry.</p><p>Brown was the President of DocX, a company that created and processed mortgage-related documents, first as a stand-alone unit, and later as a subsidiary of the document processing giant Lender Processing Solutions (LPS). And like Lynndie England, Brown committed a series of legitimate crimes. From 2003 until 2009, DocX routinely forged mortgage documents.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/shes_paying_for_wall_streets_sins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/shes_paying_for_wall_streets_sins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Betty Friedan started a revolution — and we&#8217;re still not there yet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/betty_friedans_feminist_mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/betty_friedans_feminist_mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betty Friedan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Feminine Mystique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daughters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been 50 years since "The Feminine Mystique" came out, and we are still feeling the pressure to "have it all"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Middle age is not generous to females. A man in his sixth decade can, like Alec Baldwin just this week did, proudly announce imminent parenthood with one's yoga instructor spouse. He can be a George Clooney, appearing on magazine covers looking like the guy every guy wants to be. But for women, it's different. As Tina Fey once said, "The definition of 'crazy' … is a woman who keeps talking even after no one wants to fuck her anymore." And that would generally be sometime soon after 30. But Betty Freidan's groundbreaking "Feminine Mystique," which turns 50 this week, is celebrating its milestone by getting a fresh shower of attention -- showing both just how remarkably it's aged and how stunningly topical it still is.</p><p>Friedan's book was a wallop of a tome, a peek behind the placid façade of the happy homemaker and into the dark heart of a seemingly enviable segment of American womanhood. Educated women, with their nice families and pretty homes, Friedan revealed, weren't fulfilled by staying at home and waxing their floors. They needed more. And by starting the conversation about that need, by making it OK for women to want something else, Friedan helped start a revolution.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/betty_friedans_feminist_mistake/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/betty_friedans_feminist_mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Chuck Hagel terrifies hawks, GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/why_chuck_hagel_terrifies_hawks_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/why_chuck_hagel_terrifies_hawks_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military-industrial complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13163502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His critics focus on his stances on Israel and Iran. They're really afraid he'd slash budgets and weapons systems]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a rule of thumb for understanding Washington politics: On the rare occasion when everything including the kitchen sink gets thrown at a Cabinet nominee to block an appointment, there's a solid chance that the opposition is not merely about the collage of negative headlines. Instead, it's more likely that the opposition is motivated by a deeper belief that the nominee fundamentally threatens the Beltway's Permanent Bipartisan Power Structure™. That is particularly the case when a nominee is seen as a threat to the lucrative business of permanent war -- a business whose <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-01/defense-armageddon-prediction-clashes-with-profits-optimism-2-.html">profit margins</a>, employment footprint across America, <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?Ind=D">campaign contributions</a> and <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/12/why-does-lockheed-spend-money-on-think-tanks/">think-tank underwriting</a> make it, by far, the most powerful pillar of that power structure.</p><p>This, no doubt, is a good way to understand what is almost certainly fueling much of the opposition to the nomination of former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel as the next secretary of defense.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/why_chuck_hagel_terrifies_hawks_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/why_chuck_hagel_terrifies_hawks_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hagel: Obama picks a fight he&#8217;ll win</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/the_fight_obama_is_picking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/the_fight_obama_is_picking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13163268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He provokes the right -- and maybe even some Democrats -- with his Pentagon choice. But he should have the numbers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like President Obama is about to spark a nomination fight by <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/us/obama-expected-to-select-hagel-for-defense-post.html?ref=politics&amp;_r=0">selecting Chuck Hagel for Defense secretary</a>. The question is how serious the fight will be – a half-hearted effort by a handful of John McCain/Lindsey Graham-types or a full-fledged partisan war with the potential to peel off a few Democrats and jeopardize the nomination.</p><p>Let’s start by making clear that the odds favor Hagel’s confirmation. The vast majority of Cabinet nominees sail through the process and only the occasional few are confronted with pockets of resistance that complicate their journey. Even rarer are nominees from the latter group who are ultimately rejected by the Senate, something that last happened in 1989 with John Tower, George H.W. Bush’s first choice to run the Pentagon. The most recent rejected Cabinet nominee before that? Admiral Lewis Strauss, who was nominated for Commerce secretary by Dwight Eisenhower, only to be <a href="http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Cabinet_Nomination_Defeated.htm">turned down</a> in 1959 on a 49-46 Senate vote. Also in Hagel’s favor: the party of the president nominating him controls the Senate 55-45.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/the_fight_obama_is_picking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/the_fight_obama_is_picking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The right&#8217;s coming breakup with Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_rights_coming_break_up_with_hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_rights_coming_break_up_with_hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton's been one of the "good" Democrats in their post-2008 messaging. But that's probably going to change soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton has been on the national stage for two decades now, and when it comes to her treatment by Republicans, that time can be divided into two distinct periods.</p><p>The first ran for 16 years, from early 1992, when her husband survived a wave of scandals and emerged as the Democratic nominee for president, and early 2008, when Hillary fell hopelessly behind Barack Obama in their delegate race. For all of that time, Hillary and Bill were the faces of their party and, consequently, faced a relentless, daily, over-the-top assault from the GOP. The precise nature of the attacks differed, but broadly speaking, the Clintons were treated by the right <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/tea_party_gop_base/">exactly how Barack Obama has been</a> for the past four years.</p><p>Which is no coincidence, because the turning point in the right’s relationship with Bill and Hillary came at the <a href="http://observer.com/2008/03/hillarys-new-conservative-friends/">precise moment</a> when it became clear there’d be no Clinton restoration in ’08. Suddenly, there was no day-to-day incentive for conservatives to portray them as The Worst Thing Ever To Happen To American Politics. But there was real incentive for the right to begin giving Obama the Clinton treatment, which it's been doing ever since. In the revised right-wing narrative, Bill and Hillary became symbols of a bygone era of Democratic pragmatism and cooperation – “good” Democrats whose legacy Obama was routinely tarnishing with his radical partisan warfare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_rights_coming_break_up_with_hillary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_rights_coming_break_up_with_hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who has the best smartphone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lumia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple? Nokia? Samsung? Ask a fanboy, and step back as the sparks start to fly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>"Aesthetically pleasing" is very subjective.</em></p></blockquote><p>I was deep into the fifth page of the reader comments of the first installment of Ars Technica's excellent <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/12/the-state-of-the-smartphone/">"The State of Smartphones in 2012,"</a> when I encountered this observation, which is simultaneously the most illuminating and worthless Internet comment of all time. It was a response to the declaration by Ars Technica's Andrew Cunningham that the "Live Tiles" user interface in the brand-spanking-new Windows Phone 8 operating system was more "aesthetically striking" than the icons of Apple's iOS or the widgets of Google's Android.</p><p>(With Live Tiles, the restless smartphone user can expand or shrink the on-screen real estate devoted to a particular app or function, providing a level of configurability alien to the straitlaced universe that iPhone lovers, in particular, are accustomed to. Remember this, for future reference: Windows: freedom! Apple: tyranny!)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: Kathryn Bigelow&#8217;s mesmerizing post-9/11 nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pick_of_the_week_kathryn_bigelows_mesmerizing_post_911_nightmare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pick_of_the_week_kathryn_bigelows_mesmerizing_post_911_nightmare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: No, the riveting "Zero Dark Thirty" doesn't glorify torture — its real agenda may be darker still]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe that Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal’s mesmerizing, operatic and profoundly troubling <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/zero_dark_thirty/">“Zero Dark Thirty”</a> offers any apology or justification for torture, and certainly does not “glorify” it, to use Guardian columnist <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/10/zero-dark-thirty-torture-awards">Glenn Greenwald’s</a> term. But it’s important to recognize that the people who think it does are responding to the moral ambiguity of the movie, which pervades not just the question of torture as an instrument of American policy but its entire portrayal of the CIA’s obsessive and insanely expensive hunt for Osama bin Laden. Here’s the sense in which they’re not wrong: What “Zero Dark Thirty” has to say about torture and many other things is not entirely clear, and what you see in it depends on what you bring with you. That moral ambiguity will drive some viewers nuts, but in my view it is also the quality that makes “Zero Dark Thirty” something close to a masterpiece.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pick_of_the_week_kathryn_bigelows_mesmerizing_post_911_nightmare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pick_of_the_week_kathryn_bigelows_mesmerizing_post_911_nightmare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Test case for the online gun market</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/a_test_case_for_the_online_gun_market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/a_test_case_for_the_online_gun_market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online gun market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The morning after the Oregon shootings, the family of a murdered woman sues the website that sold her killer's gun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a lawsuit that may set a precedent for cases involving the burgeoning online gun trade, the family of a woman shot dead last year is suing the website through which her shooter acquired his weapon.</p><p>The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence filed a lawsuit in Illinois this morning against Armslist.com -- a Craigslist style listing site for firearms on behalf of the family of Jitka Vesel, a 36-year-old Czech immigrant who was murdered by a jilted lover. Vesel was fatally shot with .40-calliber handgun purchased illegally on the site. According to<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/12/gun-trade-website-armslist-lawsuit"> the Guardian</a>, Armslist is among 4,000 websites which engage in gun-selling in the U.S.</p><p>The suit comes a day after a high profile shooting at an Oregon mall killed three including the gunman.</p><p>It is currently totally legal for individual, unlicensed gun dealers --  classified as "private sellers" -- to sell weapons online or at gun shows without carrying out background checks on customers. It's a loophole that "has been widely denounced by gun control advocates," <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/12/gun-trade-website-armslist-lawsuit">noted</a> the Guardian's Ed Pilkington. However, in the case of Vesel's murder, the killer was a Russian immigrant and lived out-of-state therefore did not qualify to legally buy the firearm from the seller who posted it on Armslist.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/a_test_case_for_the_online_gun_market/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/a_test_case_for_the_online_gun_market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
