<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Editor's Pick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/editors_pick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The right&#8217;s coming breakup with Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_rights_coming_break_up_with_hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_rights_coming_break_up_with_hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton's been one of the "good" Democrats in their post-2008 messaging. But that's probably going to change soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton has been on the national stage for two decades now, and when it comes to her treatment by Republicans, that time can be divided into two distinct periods.</p><p>The first ran for 16 years, from early 1992, when her husband survived a wave of scandals and emerged as the Democratic nominee for president, and early 2008, when Hillary fell hopelessly behind Barack Obama in their delegate race. For all of that time, Hillary and Bill were the faces of their party and, consequently, faced a relentless, daily, over-the-top assault from the GOP. The precise nature of the attacks differed, but broadly speaking, the Clintons were treated by the right <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/tea_party_gop_base/">exactly how Barack Obama has been</a> for the past four years.</p><p>Which is no coincidence, because the turning point in the right’s relationship with Bill and Hillary came at the <a href="http://observer.com/2008/03/hillarys-new-conservative-friends/">precise moment</a> when it became clear there’d be no Clinton restoration in ’08. Suddenly, there was no day-to-day incentive for conservatives to portray them as The Worst Thing Ever To Happen To American Politics. But there was real incentive for the right to begin giving Obama the Clinton treatment, which it's been doing ever since. In the revised right-wing narrative, Bill and Hillary became symbols of a bygone era of Democratic pragmatism and cooperation – “good” Democrats whose legacy Obama was routinely tarnishing with his radical partisan warfare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_rights_coming_break_up_with_hillary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_rights_coming_break_up_with_hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who has the best smartphone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lumia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple? Nokia? Samsung? Ask a fanboy, and step back as the sparks start to fly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>"Aesthetically pleasing" is very subjective.</em></p></blockquote><p>I was deep into the fifth page of the reader comments of the first installment of Ars Technica's excellent <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/12/the-state-of-the-smartphone/">"The State of Smartphones in 2012,"</a> when I encountered this observation, which is simultaneously the most illuminating and worthless Internet comment of all time. It was a response to the declaration by Ars Technica's Andrew Cunningham that the "Live Tiles" user interface in the brand-spanking-new Windows Phone 8 operating system was more "aesthetically striking" than the icons of Apple's iOS or the widgets of Google's Android.</p><p>(With Live Tiles, the restless smartphone user can expand or shrink the on-screen real estate devoted to a particular app or function, providing a level of configurability alien to the straitlaced universe that iPhone lovers, in particular, are accustomed to. Remember this, for future reference: Windows: freedom! Apple: tyranny!)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: Kathryn Bigelow&#8217;s mesmerizing post-9/11 nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pick_of_the_week_kathryn_bigelows_mesmerizing_post_911_nightmare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pick_of_the_week_kathryn_bigelows_mesmerizing_post_911_nightmare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: No, the riveting "Zero Dark Thirty" doesn't glorify torture — its real agenda may be darker still]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe that Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal’s mesmerizing, operatic and profoundly troubling <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/zero_dark_thirty/">“Zero Dark Thirty”</a> offers any apology or justification for torture, and certainly does not “glorify” it, to use Guardian columnist <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/10/zero-dark-thirty-torture-awards">Glenn Greenwald’s</a> term. But it’s important to recognize that the people who think it does are responding to the moral ambiguity of the movie, which pervades not just the question of torture as an instrument of American policy but its entire portrayal of the CIA’s obsessive and insanely expensive hunt for Osama bin Laden. Here’s the sense in which they’re not wrong: What “Zero Dark Thirty” has to say about torture and many other things is not entirely clear, and what you see in it depends on what you bring with you. That moral ambiguity will drive some viewers nuts, but in my view it is also the quality that makes “Zero Dark Thirty” something close to a masterpiece.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pick_of_the_week_kathryn_bigelows_mesmerizing_post_911_nightmare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pick_of_the_week_kathryn_bigelows_mesmerizing_post_911_nightmare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Test case for the online gun market</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/a_test_case_for_the_online_gun_market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/a_test_case_for_the_online_gun_market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online gun market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The morning after the Oregon shootings, the family of a murdered woman sues the website that sold her killer's gun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a lawsuit that may set a precedent for cases involving the burgeoning online gun trade, the family of a woman shot dead last year is suing the website through which her shooter acquired his weapon.</p><p>The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence filed a lawsuit in Illinois this morning against Armslist.com -- a Craigslist style listing site for firearms on behalf of the family of Jitka Vesel, a 36-year-old Czech immigrant who was murdered by a jilted lover. Vesel was fatally shot with .40-calliber handgun purchased illegally on the site. According to<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/12/gun-trade-website-armslist-lawsuit"> the Guardian</a>, Armslist is among 4,000 websites which engage in gun-selling in the U.S.</p><p>The suit comes a day after a high profile shooting at an Oregon mall killed three including the gunman.</p><p>It is currently totally legal for individual, unlicensed gun dealers --  classified as "private sellers" -- to sell weapons online or at gun shows without carrying out background checks on customers. It's a loophole that "has been widely denounced by gun control advocates," <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/12/gun-trade-website-armslist-lawsuit">noted</a> the Guardian's Ed Pilkington. However, in the case of Vesel's murder, the killer was a Russian immigrant and lived out-of-state therefore did not qualify to legally buy the firearm from the seller who posted it on Armslist.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/a_test_case_for_the_online_gun_market/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/a_test_case_for_the_online_gun_market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man up, Democrats!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/man_up_democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/man_up_democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's backwards language, but silly Lindsey Graham has a point: Dems must stop worrying and love the "fiscal cliff"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's the connection between the November election, the "fiscal cliff" stalemate and Michigan's new anti-labor right-to-work legislation?</p><p>Well, obviously Democrats won the election, holding the White House, increasing their lead in the Senate and picking up seats in the House. But while some Republicans promised to commence soul-searching about why most Americans rejected their message, their right-wing flank, and the plutocrats who fund them, are only getting crazier. That leaves victorious Democrats looking for ways to placate them, instead of looking for ways to exercise their mandate. This seems wrong.</p><p>I mean, how do you explain the phenomenon of President Obama winning Michigan by 10 points, and the state GOP's very next political move is passing unpopular right-to-work legislation in a lame duck session, before they concede seats to Democrats (and some less crazy Republicans) in January? That flies in the face of the way the political system is supposed to work. The electorate speaks; their servants listen.</p><p>But instead, Gov. Rick Snyder, who once promised not to back right-wing right-to-work legislation, instead backed rushing it through, to applause from his friends at ALEC, Americans for Prosperity and the Koch brothers. The point is to slash wages as well as to defund an institutional pillar of the Democratic Party. No retreat, no surrender.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/man_up_democrats/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/man_up_democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adam Mansbach: My year on the bestseller list</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/adam_mansbach_my_year_on_the_bestseller_list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/adam_mansbach_my_year_on_the_bestseller_list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Mansbach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Go the F to Sleep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Go the Fuck to Sleep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When "Go the F to Sleep" become a sensation, I got a crash course in parenting, celebrity and Kathie Lee Gifford]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been a year since "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1617750255/?tag=saloncom08-20">Go the Fuck to Sleep</a>" was published, and a year and a half since I read the manuscript at a museum in Philadelphia, taking the stage after a 94-year-old tap dancer. (You never want to follow a 94-year-old -- not on the freeway, not onstage.) But I woke up the next morning to find the book among Amazon’s top 100, despite the fact that it had not yet been published.</p><p>A lot of crazy shit has happened since then. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CseO1XRYs9I">Samuel L. Jackson</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sHk75RqEmE">Werner Herzog</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U46vOUr5fwI">Thandie Newton</a> and an <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MkOieIdhY0">adorable Filipina grandma</a> all did readings that went viral. Corporate publishers tried to buy the book away from tiny, independent Akashic Books for a lot of money, and we said no. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5GZqszGwa8">Jenna Elfman</a> randomly made a music video, and in return for our not suing her, met up with us in Miami with a plastic baby doll to speak to fans of literature. Time magazine named "Go the Fuck to Sleep" its “Thing of the Year,” presumably in a squeaker win over that bacon-flavored mayonnaise. Sam Jackson and I teamed back up for “<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og35U0d6WKY">Wake the Fuck Up</a>,” a pro-Obama video that reminded America of the importance of voting and vulgarity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/adam_mansbach_my_year_on_the_bestseller_list/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/adam_mansbach_my_year_on_the_bestseller_list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-to-work doesn&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lansing MI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michigan passes an anti-union law and claims it's good for workers. Economists say sure -- if you own the company]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan lawmakers gave <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/">final approval today</a> to a so-called right-to-work law, which bans unions from charging mandatory dues, arguing that it will be a boon for the state’s economy. “This is to move Michigan forward. It’s about more and better jobs, and it’s about worker choice,” Republican Gov. Rick Snyder told MSNBC this afternoon.</p><p>Right-to-work laws are already in place in 22 states, so do they actually create more and better jobs? We asked some experts to find out and the answer is, well, complicated.</p><p>Lonnie Stevans, a professor at Hofstra University who used quantitative models to <a href="http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rle.2009.5.1/rle.2009.5.1.1352/rle.2009.5.1.1352.xml?format=INT">study the issue</a>, is not bullish on the laws. “Although right-to-work states may be more attractive to business, this would not necessarily translate into enhanced economic verve in the right-to-work state if there is little ‘trickle-down’ from business owners to the non-unionized workers," he told Salon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Ashley Judd?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/poll_ashley_judd_trails_mitch_mcconnell_by_only_four_points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/poll_ashley_judd_trails_mitch_mcconnell_by_only_four_points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll shows that the actress trails Mitch McConnell by just 4 points in a hypothetical Senate race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/12/mcconnell-highly-unpopular.html">PPP</a> shows that in a hypothetical matchup between actress Ashley Judd and Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Judd is only behind by 4 points.</p><p>Judd, who says she is considering a run in 2014, is trailing 47-43 percent behind McConnell, who happens to be the most unpopular senator in the country.</p><p>From PPP:</p><blockquote><p>Only 37% of Kentucky voters approve of him to 55% disapprove. Both in terms of raw disapproval (55%) and net approval (-18) McConnell has the worst numbers of any of his peers, taking that mantle from Nebraska's Ben Nelson.</p> <p>McConnell is predictably very unpopular with Democrats (23/73). But his numbers are almost as bad with independents (33/58) and even with Republicans he's well below the 70-80% approval range you would usually expect for a Senator within their own party (59/28).</p></blockquote><p>Among Democrats, Judd is the top choice for the primary, with 29 percent of the vote, compared to Lt. Gov. Jerry  Abramson who came in second at 16 percent.</p><p>PPP surveyed 1,266 Kentucky voters for the survey overall, and 585 Democratic primary voters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/poll_ashley_judd_trails_mitch_mcconnell_by_only_four_points/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/poll_ashley_judd_trails_mitch_mcconnell_by_only_four_points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My shazam boobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/my_shazam_boobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/my_shazam_boobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a feminist, I believe breasts shouldn't matter. So why do I care so much how mine look, and whether I lose them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Are you upset about losing your breast?” I asked Mary, my grandmother, while my grandfather brought the car around. This was June 2000, and she had accepted the news from the doctor calmly, with one hand in mine, the other in my grandfather’s. A mastectomy was called for; she had declined reconstructive plastic surgery, dismissing it out of hand. “You know you can always change your mind and get the plastic surgery later,” I continued. She laughed. “I don’t care about that, honey,” she said. “I just hope the cancer hasn’t spread.” And that was that. We set a date for the surgery and went home.</p><p>She was 76, I was 32. I had recently started dating the man I would soon marry. When I told Andy that if I had breast cancer, I would feel the way Mary did — that I would be fine with having a mastectomy, I just wouldn’t want to die — he replied “But I like your breasts. You’d try to keep them for me, right?”</p><p>The night after my grandmother’s mastectomy, Andy took my nipples into his mouth before we made love in a grand, unusual gesture. “I shouldn’t ignore your breasts,” he whispered. As if he were nervous that they might be gone someday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/my_shazam_boobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/my_shazam_boobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ann Coulter: Voice of reason?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/ann_coulter_voice_of_reason/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/ann_coulter_voice_of_reason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ellen degeneres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Million Moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.C. Penney's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've embraced Ellen, gay marriage and progress. If Ann Coulter knows, why are radical right groups still fighting?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do Ellen DeGeneres and the "fiscal cliff" have in common? They’re both signs of the inevitability of social progress and the demise of the radical right.</p><p>In case you missed it, DeGeneres stars in a new JC Penney’s ad in which the openly gay TV host flagrantly tries to persuade three of Santa’s elves to make more toys for Christmas. While at first glance, a naive viewer might think the ad is a ploy by a crumbling department store to boost holiday business by promising free stuff, the trained eyes at the conservative One Million Moms group <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/08/ellen-degeneres-one-million-moms-moving-on-jc-penney-protest_n_2264504.html" target="_blank">know better</a>.</p><p>Vulnerable Americans watching their televisions will obviously be brainwashed. Hmm, what should I get Uncle Sid for Christmas this year? I know, homosexuality! JC Penney’s is practically giving it away!</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-XtS7I50Gwk" frameborder="0" width="640" height="360"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/ann_coulter_voice_of_reason/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/ann_coulter_voice_of_reason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Republicans just bad at politics?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/are_republicans_just_bad_at_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/are_republicans_just_bad_at_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans want to believe their problem is messaging, not ideas. That's dangerous strategy -- and wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the hand-wringing and soul searching going on in the conservative movement boils down to one fundamental question: Are we bad at selling our policies, or are the policies themselves the problem? This distinction is critical and leads to radically different prescriptions. If the issue is merely in the marketing, then the damage the party sustained a month ago is mostly cosmetic and can be quickly repaired with better messaging and candidates. The alternative, however, calls for rethinking foundational principles -- and is much more painful.</p><p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_republican_crisis_Qa5DtRK4LC6EtswfoLo8mN">John Podhoretz</a> and <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/07/framing-the-debate/">Matt Lewis</a> made the cases for the "just politics" camp in the context of the "fiscal cliff" debate. Democrats, they argue, have deftly outmaneuvered Republicans into spending all their time defending unpopular things that are peripheral to core conservative values. Podhoretz writes in the New York Post that even though Republicans have the superior policy on the Bush tax cuts and the need to cut entitlements, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_republican_crisis_Qa5DtRK4LC6EtswfoLo8mN">they have the inferior “messaging”</a> and have ended up the “the eat-your-vegetables-and-shut-up party” -- noble and responsible, but doomed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/are_republicans_just_bad_at_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/are_republicans_just_bad_at_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My husband&#8217;s secret gay life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/my_husbands_secret_gay_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/my_husbands_secret_gay_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Searched and Destroyed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought we were a happy couple. Then I discovered the website that proved everything was false]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I’ll be the jailer and you be the naughty prisoner.”</p><p>When I read those words, a chat conversation between my then-husband and another man, it felt for just a moment like all the oxygen had been sucked from the room. I remember putting my hand on my chest, gasping for air, as the world I thought I knew shattered around me.</p><p>He was surprisingly conciliatory and accommodating in the divorce negotiations. In the Deep South state we lived in at the time, within 30 days it was final. Our eight-year marriage was over before the indentation from my wedding ring had even faded from my finger.</p><p>Because I couldn’t bear the thought of enduring other people’s pity — or ridicule — and because I had two very small children to raise, I made the decision to pack up and move two states away. We’d get a brand-new start, my children and me, away from anyone who knew that we’d once been a different, complete family.</p><p>While unpacking my desk in our new home, I came across the transcript of the chat that had brought down my marriage. As I quickly scanned the now-familiar words, something new jumped out at me. The “jailer” made reference to my ex-husband’s website. Website? I googled his screen name.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/my_husbands_secret_gay_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/my_husbands_secret_gay_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Dickens&#8217; great disappointments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/charles_dickens_great_disappointments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/charles_dickens_great_disappointments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Dickens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literary Classics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Gottlieb discusses the author's 10 children and the great expectations of literary offspring]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One day, Robert Gottlieb picked up a one-volume collection of letters by one of his favorite writers, Charles Dickens, in a used bookstore. Reading it, he was struck by just how much of Dickens' correspondence concerned his 10 children: Charley, Mamie, Katey, Walter, Frank, Alfred, Sydney, Henry, Dora (who died in infancy) and Plorn (Edward). The novelist spent so much time worrying about and trying to establish the futures of his sons and daughters that Gottlieb couldn't help wondering how they'd all turned out.</p><p>Gottlieb's storied career as editor in chief of Simon &amp; Schuster and Alfred A. Knopf, as well as a five-year stint as editor in chief of the New Yorker, has provided him with plenty of firsthand experience in the foibles of literary greats. (He discovered and edited Joseph Heller's "Catch-22" and has edited the work of such authors as John Cheever, Toni Morrison, John le Carré, Ray Bradbury, Robert A. Caro, Barbara Tuchman and Bill Clinton.) Late in life, he launched a second career as a writer, contributing long critical essays to the New York Review of Books and the New Yorker, as well as penning biographies of Sarah Bernhardt and George Balanchine. Deciding that the lives of the Dickens children merited further investigation, he followed his usual method of absorbing all available writings on the topic. An irresistibly readable new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0374298807/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Great Expectations: The Sons and Daughters of Charles Dickens,"</a> is the result.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/charles_dickens_great_disappointments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/charles_dickens_great_disappointments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Homeland&#8217;s&#8221; best shark-jumping moments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/homelands_best_shark_jumping_moments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/homelands_best_shark_jumping_moments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We love to call it out for flying off the rails. But the genius of the series: It always recovers its footing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Homeland” returns tonight with the penultimate installment of its second season, having just delivered the most <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maureen-ryan/homeland-finale-theories_b_2237622.html">controversial and outrageous episode</a> of its existence. “Homeland” has previously done a lot of crazy things, but last week’s storyline, in which Abu Nazir kidnapped Carrie and then let her go after Brody promised to kill the Vice President but before Brody had actually done so, seemed to many — <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/homeland_recap_what_a_mess/">me included</a>! — like a very long, tipsy walk into implausibility town. But a week later, there is one “Homeland” pattern that permits me to believe it will be back on the side of good television this week: “Homeland’s” habit of repeatedly jumping back and forth over the shark.</p><p>Doing crazy things and then pulling back on them — writing as if they don’t matter, tamping them down so they’re irrelevant, silo-ing them off from the main plot — is a standard “Homeland” tactic. “Homeland” regularly does something bananas to give the audience a thrill and then, weeks later when you re-examine the moment, you find that it has had little to no effect on the thrust of the show’s major storylines and relationships. "Homeland" jumps the shark one episode, but then swiftly steps back to the other side in time for the next.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/homelands_best_shark_jumping_moments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/homelands_best_shark_jumping_moments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change can be stopped</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/climate_change_can_be_stopped/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/climate_change_can_be_stopped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While politicians go slowly on global warming, individuals can do more than they think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are nearly everywhere becoming more aware of and better informed about climate, energy, and sustainability. This savvy is becoming baked into our educational systems, our laws, and our cultural institutions, and will only further deepen the understanding that people have of the issues and the many ways of dealing with the environmental crisis that confronts us.</p><p>This awareness is reflected in many polls. Most populations in the major economies that account for 80 percent of greenhouse gas emissions have a high level of awareness. Gallup has surveyed people in 111 countries and found that 42 percent found global warming a serious threat. In another poll, a broad majority wanted action on climate change, with majorities in fourteen of fifteen countries, both developed and developing nations, willing to address the matter.</p><p>One other poll has found that about half of Americans recognize that particular phenomena such as coastline erosion and flooding, droughts, hurricanes, river flooding, and wildfires are being exacerbated by warming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/climate_change_can_be_stopped/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/climate_change_can_be_stopped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilbo Baggins says, &#8220;Buy this!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hobbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behold the onslaught of Hobbit action figures. Hobbit Legos. Hobbit meals. If only they did this to "Anna Karenina"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Peter Jackson’s “The Lord of the Rings” ruled the megaplexes for most of the early years of this century, it was inevitable that “The Hobbit” would follow. What was perhaps also inevitable — given the way the film industry and popular culture, in general, operates these days — is that after turning J.R.R. Tolkien’s massive three-book fantasy trilogy into a massive three-film fantasy trilogy, Warner Brothers and New Line Cinema would turn the slender folk-tale prequel into … another massive three-film fantasy trilogy.</p><p>That Hollywood is driven more by market forces than by artistic ones is a cliché so old it’s almost become axiomatic. Blame the collapse of the studio system in the 1960s. Hollywood did just fine when all the major studios were in the business of creating, as well as financing, the films bearing their logos; they even went so far as to seek out new talent, nurture it, and develop it over the course of years. Today, studios are just the money men, and projects are developed by independent production companies — every actor and director has his or her own — and then brought to MGM or Fox or Disney in supplication with the hope of a big, fat bankroll.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war on Christmas movies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/the_war_on_christmas_movies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/the_war_on_christmas_movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fitzgerald Family Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does the awfulness of most Yule-themed movies tell us about the reality of our so-called favorite holiday?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is there really a “war on Christmas” being waged by pinko, lefty, pro-choice, sexually bewildered heathens, as Bill O’Reilly proclaims around this time every year? Well, I don’t know about that, but there’s definitely a war on Christmas <em>movies</em> in that nobody seems capable of making good ones and the list of unwatchably crappy ones grows longer every year. Admittedly, it’s hard for any movie of any kind to be more painful than Tim Allen’s “Santa Clause” series. (There are three of them. <em>Three!</em>) But then, you probably haven’t seen either the 1977 remake of “It’s a Wonderful Life” starring Marlo Thomas or whatever the “Christmas Carol” knockoff from the '90s was called in which Vanessa Williams played Ebony Scrooge.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/the_war_on_christmas_movies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/the_war_on_christmas_movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>She&#8217;s fat, and I&#8217;m not</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/shes_fat_and_im_not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/shes_fat_and_im_not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, I lost 50 pounds. Now, I'm torn between accepting my girlfriend and wanting a better life for her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long ago, my girlfriend and I planned a trip to New Orleans. The friend we were visiting sent an e-mail reminder to pack our bathing suits because she’d planned a day trip tubing down a river.</p><p>My girlfriend didn’t look too excited. “There are weight limits,” she said. “There’s a lot of things I’ll never do with you, you know. Like hang gliding or zip lining. We’re never going to jump out of a plane together, and I can’t ride a donkey to the bottom of the Grand Canyon.”</p><p>I’ll take a pass on falling out of the sky like human confetti or riding a fragrant donkey on a hot August day.What does bother me is when my girlfriend feels excluded or like she’s holding us back from an experience because of her weight.</p><p>“First of all, don’t say never,” I told her. “But if we don’t, that’s fine by me.”</p><p>Just to avoid an uncomfortable situation, I called ahead to ask if there were weight limits on tube rentals. The woman on the phone sounded confused at first, but when I clarified, she offered some southern-accented sympathy.</p><p>“Oh, hon,” she said, “we’ve had some pretty large people come and float with us. We’re all getting bigger, you know.” I thanked her for the consolation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/shes_fat_and_im_not/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/shes_fat_and_im_not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim DeMint, failure</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jim_demint_failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jim_demint_failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's packing up his Senate office while Obama plans his second inaugural and Harry Reid enjoys a bigger majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Bizarro World of Beltway media, up can be down and down up, especially when it comes to what's good for Republicans and Democrats. Most political developments, even positive ones, are spun as <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-05/team-obama-shows-dangerous-penchant-for-hubris-albert-r-hunt.html">particularly challenging for Democrats</a>; disasters can wind up being depicted as opportunities or even glory when they befall Republicans.</p><p>Such is the coverage of Sen. Jim DeMint's departure from the U.S. Senate to take over the Heritage Foundation. So many words have been spent on this news. I hadn't planned on weighing in, but after watching all the ways it's being spun as some kind of victory for DeMint and the Tea Party, I had to say: Enough!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jim_demint_failure/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jim_demint_failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My big, strong, manly hands</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/my_big_strong_manly_hands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/my_big_strong_manly_hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted fingers that were girlish, but my body betrayed my true self: Hungry, wanting and grabby]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I inherited a lot from my mother, though I first recognized my hands. Long fingered and wide palmed, we are women with muscular hands, working hands. In adolescence, it struck me as unfair, because my mother was beautiful — pale and ethereal, with fine features and blue eyes — and no one was ever going to be distracted from her face by her hands. But me? I felt too animal to be beautiful.</p><p>Before I gave thought to beauty, I delighted in my body. I was a strong, brown, passionate child, with lots and lots of words. I talked fast, and I moved faster – through the woods around our Cape Cod home, up trees, into the ocean’s crashing surf. I also felt a lot, finely tuned to the swells of my own heart, as well as others’ wants and hurts. I sensed a deep well at my center, and sometimes it bubbled over. I’d read or think or feel myself into a brimming state, then lie with my back to the ground, body vibrating, heart thudding, mind foaming, fearing I might combust – suffer a supernova of brain and heart, annihilate myself. I also fell down a lot. I banged into walls and trees, and tumbled up and down stairs almost daily. The refrain of my childhood was “slow down, Melissa!” and my nickname “Crash,” but I always got right up — skinned knees, purpled thighs, stinging palms — and brushed myself off, kept going.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/my_big_strong_manly_hands/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/my_big_strong_manly_hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>