<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Editor's Picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/editors_picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:30:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can your iPhone help you lose weight?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/can_your_iphone_help_you_lose_weight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/can_your_iphone_help_you_lose_weight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantified self]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weight Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lose it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myfitnessapp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dieting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Year's resolution: Join the Quantified Self movement and see if smartphone apps can help shed unwanted pounds ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graydon Carter, the <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/2013/02/graydon-carter-quantified-self">editor in chief of Vanity Fair,</a> weighed in this month on the <a href="http://quantifiedself.com/">"Quantified Self"</a> movement. The Quantified Selfers, he tells us, with a hefty serving of snoot, are a "younger growing demographic" of people "who like to record and share every aspect of their lives no matter how inconsequential."</p><blockquote><p>Where past generations had film cameras, scrapbooks, notebooks, and that part of the brain which stores memories, we now have a smartphone app for every conceivable recording need. The thing is, all that time you spend logging and then curating the quotidian aspects of your daily life is time taken away from actually doing things.</p></blockquote><p>There is just so much to unpack in Carter's dismissal, one hardly knows where to begin. There's the dig at current generations, who presumably lack the part of the brain that stores memories. There's the implicit certainty that curating one's life isn't actually <em>doing</em> anything, suggesting that in spending your time logging data you deprive yourself of some greater chance at capturing life's essence. And then there's the sweeping arrogance of the phrase "no matter how inconsequential."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/can_your_iphone_help_you_lose_weight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/can_your_iphone_help_you_lose_weight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: Beautiful white people hit by tsunami!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/pick_of_the_week_beautiful_white_people_hit_by_tsunami/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/pick_of_the_week_beautiful_white_people_hit_by_tsunami/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ewan McGregor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Watts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: Naomi Watts and Ewan McGregor see their Euro-privilege swept away in "The Impossible"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using natural disaster – or manmade apocalypse, ecological catastrophe, alien invasion – as the backdrop for human drama goes clear back to the invention of cinema as spectacle, and arguably a long way before that. Of course we’re not supposed to think that the big, dramatic flood is the main point of the Noah story in the Book of Genesis, or in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_of_Gilgamesh">Epic of Gilgamesh.</a> But it certainly helped hold the audience’s attention. Given that, it’s surprising that mainstream filmmakers have all but ignored the devastating <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake_and_tsunami">Indian Ocean tsunami</a> of 2004, an event that killed almost 100 times more people than the 9/11 attacks and may well have been the worst natural disaster in recorded history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/pick_of_the_week_beautiful_white_people_hit_by_tsunami/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/pick_of_the_week_beautiful_white_people_hit_by_tsunami/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Hollywood ruined Tolkien?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/has_hollywood_ruined_tolkien/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/has_hollywood_ruined_tolkien/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hobbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Jackson's ridiculous CGI has stripped "The Hobbit" of its poetry. Maybe some images are better left unseen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a>  HOW KIND OF Peter Jackson: for the price of one movie, he gave us <em>two</em>. One of these movies is about a heroic warrior prince fighting for his lost homeland, and some political intrigue with elves and wizards; the other, much shorter, movie concerns a hobbit.</p><p>Written by J.R.R. Tolkien as a book for children, <em>The Hobbit </em>is widely regarded as a prelude to the darker and more complex <em>Lord of the Rings </em>trilogy. The One Ring that is the focus of <em>The Lord of the Rings, </em>and which threatens to destroy Tolkien’s world of Middle Earth, is first discovered in <em>The Hobbit </em>by the protagonist Bilbo Baggins. The true nature of the ring is never revealed in <em>The Hobbit </em>—<em> </em>it is depicted simply as a magic ring that conveniently endows Bilbo with the ability to become invisible.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/has_hollywood_ruined_tolkien/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/has_hollywood_ruined_tolkien/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera different than Fox?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... or MSNBC? The Qatari network had a rough intro a decade ago and Time Warner -- and others -- won't forget ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qatari network Al Jazeera’s purchase of Al Gore’s Current news channel, <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/al-jazeera-said-to-be-acquiring-current-tv/">revealed yesterday</a>, has already hit a snag: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/time-warner-al-jazeera-current-tv_n_2399370.html">Time Warner Cable promptly dropped Current</a>, denying the forthcoming Al Jazeera America access to Time Warner subscribers.</p><p>Though the Time Warner decision had reportedly been threatened due to Current’s low ratings, there’s no denying that at least some segment of the U.S. viewing public has long harbored antipathy toward Al Jazeera. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/03/liberal-al-gore-becomes-very-rich-hypocrite-with-sale-current-tv/">An editorial published today</a> by Fox News runs through the talking points about the network it calls “anti-American terror mouthpiece Al Jazeera.” Among them: “Al Jazeera, known as the network of the Arab Street, is also known for taking anti-American, anti-Israel and pro-terror positions.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do millennials care about abortion?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Keenan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NARAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an exit interview, NARAL's president tells Salon it's time a new generation leads. But she's not sure they will]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the eve of Roe v. Wade's 40th anniversary, NARAL Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan, 60, announced she would celebrate by stepping down and handing the reins to a younger generation -- the same one she had been <a href="http://www.blogforchoice.com/archives/2010/04/nancy-keenan-re-1.html">arguing</a> for years lacks the pro-choice intensity and commitment of her own.</p><p>Formed originally to repeal abortion bans before Roe, NARAL is now most closely associated with lobbying on the federal and state level, and for its close ties to the Democratic Party. Keenan's departure after eight years follows an election cycle when Democrats didn't apologize for being pro-choice -- and won.</p><p>This last election year also featured unprecedented public mobilization, across generations, on issues around abortion, birth control and rape. Two men, Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock, most closely associated with a total abortion ban lost Senate bids they'd seemed poised to win. Akin, too, came from a House of Representatives where antiabortion and anti-family planning legislating had seemed like a full-time job, but whose actual legislative victories have been few.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim O&#8217;Brien tries to make sense of wartime chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tim_obrien_tries_to_make_sense_of_wartime_chaos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tim_obrien_tries_to_make_sense_of_wartime_chaos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim o'brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audiobooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Listener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before writing "The Things They Carried," O'Brien offered this profound memoir of his year fighting in Vietnam]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim O’Brien is best known as the writer of “The Things They Carried” and “In the Lake of the Woods” — two works of fiction about the Vietnam War and its aftermath that can be safely counted among the most accomplished, affecting, important, troubling and pleasurable documents of the 20th century.</p><p>The foundation for those books was laid in Vietnam itself, where he began writing his first book, “If I Die in a Combat Zone, Box Me Up and Ship Me Home,” a memoir, in the last hour or two of daylight, from the foxhole he had dug to keep himself alive, a story he recounts in an interview bundled with the newly released 40th anniversary audiobook edition of the memoir. By the end of his tour, he had accumulated, by his count, 30 or 40 handwritten pages, which represented the beginning of a lifelong reckoning with what O’Brien now calls “that terrible decision”: “What do you do when you get a draft notice and you think a war is wrong? And I struggled with that for months prior to my being inducted into the army, and I’m still struggling with it, 40 years later.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tim_obrien_tries_to_make_sense_of_wartime_chaos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tim_obrien_tries_to_make_sense_of_wartime_chaos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner holds on to speaker post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite some defections, the Ohio congressman will serve another two years as speaker of the House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner squeaked by in a vote for speakership this afternoon, getting 220 votes of 426 cast, just  a handful of votes over the number needed to hang on to his seat.</p><p>There were, however, a total of 14 defections from both Boehner, and Nancy Pelosi, who got 192 votes.</p><p>House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Va., got three votes. Reps. Louie Gohmert, Texas, and Paul Broun, Ga., both cast votes for ousted Rep. Allen West, Fla.</p><p>Tim Huelskamp, Kan., one of the four conservatives Boehner ousted from his committee spot, cast a vote for Jim Jordan, Ohio. Dave Schweikert, Ariz., another one of those conservatives, did support Boehner.</p><p>Both Michael Grimm and Peter King of New York, who had been at odds with Boehner over Hurricane Sandy relief funding, both voted for the speaker to keep his seat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ever-changing ideologies of Jane Roe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Roe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norma McCorvey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new profile of Norma McCorvey reveals the complicated woman behind the historic abortion ruling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four decades ago, she was known as Jane Roe. She was already a mother, and when she became pregnant again she fought, all the way to the Supreme Court, for the right to terminate. And though that eventual decision came too late for her to act upon it, it changed reproductive freedom in this country -- and has been hotly fought over ever since. But Norma McCorvey has long made it clear she isn't the patron saint of abortion. And <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2013/01/commoditization-norma-mccorvey-jane-roe-wade">in a new profile in Vanity Fair</a> to mark the 40th anniversary of Roe v<em>.</em> Wade, she emerges as the most contradictory of figures, a woman who has built a career around disavowing her role in a history-making case.</p><p>McCorvey wasn't interviewed for Joshua Prager's profile. "I almost forgot i have a one thousand dollar fee," she texted him when he requested to speak to her. And when he declined to pay, she replied, "Then we wont speak." Why should she, when being Jane Roe has been her job? It's a job that has exasperated pro-choice activists and been exploited by the far right. Just last summer, "legitimate rape" expert Todd Akin erroneously cited her example as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/todd_akin_blame_law_order/">"false claims like those made in Roe v<em>.</em> Wade."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weakened Boehner still likely to hang on to speakership</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House speaker has been lambasted by multiple factions within the GOP, but he's likely to retain his title]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though House Speaker John Boehner is poised to hang on to his speakership in Thursday's vote, he enters the new session of Congress considerably weaker than the last.</p><p>Boehner has been hearing it from both flanks of his caucus, with 151 members of his own party voting against the "fiscal cliff" deal, and Republican New York Reps. Peter King and Michael Grimm expressing outrage that Republican leadership failed to call a vote over Hurricane Sandy relief aid.</p><p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/275335-boehner-pelosi-facing-defections-as-house-votes-for-speaker">The Hill</a> reported this morning:</p><blockquote><p>Boehner could also face opposition from the four Republicans punished this month for bucking leadership. Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.), Tim Huelskamp (Kan.), Walter Jones (N.C.) and Dave Schweikert (Ariz.) were all stripped of their committee posts by the Boehner-led GOP Steering Committee, and they've been grumbling ever since.</p> <p>There has been speculation that 17 Republicans could join forces and deny Boehner the majority he needs to become Speaker. House rules dictate that a lawmaker must receive a majority of the votes in order to get the Speaker's gavel. Republican lawmakers, including one who is not fond of Boehner, said no such effort is under way.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, East Coast Republicans, but this is your party too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey governor helps the GOP keep power -- then doesn't like the results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spare me, Chris Christie. The New Jersey governor <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/chris_christie_gops_toxic_politics_to_blame_for_delayed_sandy_aid/">delighted political reporters</a> with his theatrical excoriation of the Republican leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives after Speaker John Boehner refused to allow a bill funding aid for people affected by Hurricane Sandy to come to the floor for a vote this week.</p><p>This would be the same Christie who, in September 2012, headlined <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81052.html">a fundraiser for Iowa congressman Steve King</a>, who is not just one of the craziest members of the GOP crazy wing, but who also <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/31/steve-king-hurricane-sandy_n_2047553.html">announced a month later that he probably wouldn't vote for relief money for Sandy victims</a> for the same reason he refused to vote for federal aid for victims of Hurricane Katrina: Because he was pretty sure people spent the relief money on "Gucci bags and massage parlors." This is a man Christie wanted to win reelection, in order to help Republicans maintain control of the House of Representatives, so that they could continue ignoring the priorities and desperate needs of liberal, urban coastal states like New Jersey.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Catholic Church&#8217;s new gay insult</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_catholic_church_continues_their_anti_gay_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_catholic_church_continues_their_anti_gay_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catholic leaders in the U.S. and U.K. may keep on speaking out against gay marriage. But they can't fight progress]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been a busy past few weeks for the Catholic Church and its muckety-mucks. There was the pope's holiday message insisting that gay marriage is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_popes_hateful_christmas_message/">a threat to world peace and an "attack" on the family. </a>Then, Ireland's Cardinal Sean Brady used the death of a pregnant woman in a Galway hospital – and subsequent galvanizing outcry — as an excuse to urge his nation's Catholics to insist on the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_catholic_churchs_angry_christmas/">preservation of rights for the "innocent."</a> And finally, in one last little outburst of vituperation before the year ran out, Italian priest Piero Corsi posted a rant on a bulletin board of his church, blaming women for <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/27/us-italy-priest-idUSBRE8BQ0E020121227 ">"provoking the worst instincts, which then turn into violence and sexual abuse,"</a> adding, "The core of the problem is in the fact that women are more and more provocative, they yield to arrogance, they believe they can do everything themselves and they end up exacerbating tensions." But lest you think the men in black now intend to ease off on the crazy talk for the winter, it looks instead like they're just getting warmed up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_catholic_church_continues_their_anti_gay_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_catholic_church_continues_their_anti_gay_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Buckwild&#8221;: MTV comes to the Appalachian mountains</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/buckwild_mtv_comes_to_the_appalachian_mountains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/buckwild_mtv_comes_to_the_appalachian_mountains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey Shore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buckwild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MTV may be “heck-bent” on exploiting misguided youth for profit. But "creekers" do exist. And so do people like me]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/tv-column/post/mtv-buckwild-hits-pay-dirt-with-sen-joe-manchins-angry-letter/2012/12/07/422caf38-40ad-11e2-bca3-aadc9b7e29c5_blog.html">After MTV announced its new reality show “Buckwild” last month</a> — the series debuts tomorrow night —  it wasn’t long before friends started sending me links to the trailer without comment — the virtual equivalent of excitedly tapping me on the shoulder and saying, “Look! Your people!” The show, described as the <a href="http://gma.yahoo.com/video/tv-26594281/mtv-s-buckwild-the-jersey-shore-of-appalachia-31276876.html">“‘Jersey Shore’ of Appalachia,”</a> stars “an outrageous group of childhood friends” who live, party and shoot potato guns in Sissonville, W.Va. In the<a href="http://m.mtv.com/videos/video.rbml;jsessionid=avmSrZLF3LVNatq8XQU-vaEp?emvcc=0&amp;nborh=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&amp;id=mgid:uma:video:mtv.com:860723&amp;series=buckwild&amp;source=shows&amp;nbck=999-001-001&amp;nbcol=1%7Cunknown&amp;nbck=501-012-001"> trailer</a>, one cast member receives a “birthday lickin’”; another boasts, “I don’t have no phone, Facebook — none of that Internet stuff.” My fellow West Virginians were quick to decry “ugly, inaccurate stereotypes!” and the state’s “Democratic” senator (formerly, governor) Joe Manchin III even went on the <a href="http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50143744#50143744">"Today" show to denounce the “travesty.”</a> After using the phrase “heck-bent,” he called West Virginia “one of the greatest states in the nation” and suggested, cringe-worthily, that maybe MTV could “show a balance” by presenting the state’s “greatest young adults who’ve accomplished an awful lot,” alongside the “Buckwild” cast. The big, bad media responded with the noble savage argument; in an interview with Entertainment Weekly, one of the show’s producers called the lack of Internet thing “refreshing” while Tricia Romano, writing for the Daily Beast, deferred to TV historian Tim Brooks. "There is some self-awareness over what they are doing,” she quoted Brooks. “They are proud of it. One of the things you learn from these shows is that people who aren’t like us may be proudly not like us. They live differently intentionally."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/buckwild_mtv_comes_to_the_appalachian_mountains/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/buckwild_mtv_comes_to_the_appalachian_mountains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest fiscal cliff lessons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pelosi still speaker. Obama still open to cutting Medicare, Social Security. U.S. still run by and for the wealthy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite boasting on both sides that Congress finally made a deal on the so-called fiscal cliff, people looking for details about the deal's ultimate outcome are going to have to wait until March. (A lot of important people had vacations ruined, so they have a stake in pretending something big got accomplished.)</p><p>There's no way to know how bad or good a deal Democrats cut until the conflict they postponed is resolved, and we know what it takes to lift the debt ceiling, keep the government running and deal with the "sequester" – the combination of automatic spending cuts to defense and to social programs baked into the original debt ceiling deal back in August 2011.</p><p>As someone who believed, and still believes, that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_case_against_cooperation/">it was best for the country if Democrats stood up to Republican hostage takers and went over the cliff</a>, I have to admit President Obama and his chief negotiator Vice President Joe Biden got some good things with this deal. Unemployment benefits were extended for 2 million Americans and so were tax credits that help the working and middle class. The deal also kept student-loan interest rates low. Lots of Democrats are also celebrating the fact that Republicans voted for their first tax-rate increase in 20 years. But since the White House got far less in revenue than it originally asked for, we'll see how great a concession that turned out to be, since the deal kept tax rates low for millions of wealthy Americans, and ceded crucial hikes on estates and investment income for the super-rich.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andrew Sullivan goes indie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_goes_indie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_goes_indie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Dish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The political blogger explains his bold dive into the murky waters of reader-supported online journalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extra! Extra! The Daily Dish is <a>going independent.</a> Andrew Sullivan, blogger extraordinaire, declared today that his venerable, high-profile, prolific blogging operation will no longer depend on the largess of corporate owners like Time, the Atlantic or the Daily Beast to operate. He's going indie, and depending on readers to pay up.</p><p>The announcement sent shock waves through Twitter. It's a risky, bold move. Very few people have figured out how to get readers to pay for content on the Web. Sullivan's model is innovative: He plans to eschew advertising altogether. Instead, we get what he has dubbed "freemium-based metering."</p><blockquote><p>Our particular version will be a meter that will be counted every time you hit a "Read on" button to expand or contract a lengthy post. You'll have a limited number of free read-ons a month, before we hit you up for $19.99. Everything else on the Dish will remain free. No link from another blog to us will ever be counted for the meter - so no blogger or writer need ever worry that a link to us will push their readers into a paywall. It won't. Ever. There is no paywall. Just a freemium-based meter. We've tried to maximize what's freely available, while monetizing those parts of the Dish where true Dishheads reside. The only tough love we're offering is the answer to the View From Your Window Contest. You'll have to become a member to find where the place is. Ha!</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_goes_indie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_goes_indie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans turn on House GOP leadership over Sandy aid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/new_york_republicans_turn_on_house_gop_leadership_over_sandy_aid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/new_york_republicans_turn_on_house_gop_leadership_over_sandy_aid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Rep. Peter King calls the House GOP's decision to adjourn before voting on Sandy relief "disgraceful"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans in states hit hardest by Hurricane Sandy are lining up against House Republican leadership for adjourning  before allowing a vote to fund relief efforts.</p><p>On Wednesday, Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., excoriated John Boehner and House Republicans, calling it "absolutely disgraceful" and saying that "my world turned upside down last night."</p><p>"People in my party, they wonder why they're becoming a minority party," King said on CNN. "They're writing off New York, they're writing off New Jersey. Well, they've written me off, and they're gonna have a hard time getting my vote, I can tell you that."</p><p>King added that "anyone from New York or New Jersey who contributes one penny to the Republican Congressional Campaign Committee should have their head examined."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Y170mF1PuBc" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Rep. Michael Grimm, R-N.Y., said he was "utterly devastated" by the decision, and called it "beyond surprising" that the House adjourned without a vote. He said it was ultimately House Speaker John Boehner's call to adjourn without a vote, and that he had received signals from House Majority Leader Eric Cantor that the vote would happen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/new_york_republicans_turn_on_house_gop_leadership_over_sandy_aid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/new_york_republicans_turn_on_house_gop_leadership_over_sandy_aid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics has become the new reality TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/politics_has_become_the_new_reality_tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/politics_has_become_the_new_reality_tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With politicians shamelessly mugging during the "fiscal cliff" crisis, D.C. really is Hollywood for ugly people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politico's <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/the-fiscal-cliff-deal-that-almost-wasnt-85663.html">well-reported narrative</a> of the fiscal cliff negotiations begins with an inevitable anecdote:</p><blockquote><p>“Go f— yourself,” Boehner sniped as he pointed his finger at Reid, according to multiple sources present.</p> <p>Reid, a bit startled, replied: “What are you talking about?”</p> <p>Boehner repeated: “Go f— yourself.”</p> <p>The harsh exchange just a few steps from the Oval Office — which Boehner later bragged about to fellow Republicans ...</p></blockquote><p>I love those blushing em dashes, as if the four-letter word itself would scandalize Politico's hard-bitten audience.</p><p>Years ago Vice President Dick Cheney expressed himself similarly, addressing Sen. Patrick Leahy, D.-Vt.). While the remark made it into the press, it's fair to take Cheney at his word. The veep later <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYY1oDDYS18">congratulated himself</a> for his bravado.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/politics_has_become_the_new_reality_tv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/politics_has_become_the_new_reality_tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who were the Democrats who voted against &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; deal?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/who_were_the_democrats_who_voted_against_fiscal_cliff_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/who_were_the_democrats_who_voted_against_fiscal_cliff_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "fiscal cliff" bill, which split House Republican leadership, also saw opposition from Dems in both chambers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the deal to avoid the "fiscal cliff" passed with overwhelming Democratic support, there were those in both the House and the Senate who were disappointed with the legislation that Congress ultimately pushed through.</p><p>In the House, 172 Democrats voted for the bill, with 16 who opposed it. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/02/the-fiscal-cliff-how-the-house-voted/">Of the 16</a>, nine lean more liberal, including Rep. Peter DeFazio, Ore., who <a href="http://www.defazio.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=804%3Astatement-on-fiscal-cliff-vote&amp;catid=69%3A2012-press-releases&amp;Itemid=1">explained</a>:</p><blockquote><p>While the Senate plan included an extension of unemployment insurance that will save benefits for over 29,000 Oregonians and an essential ‘doc-fix’ that will continue payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients, this ‘deal’ hinders our ability to deal meaningfully with the deficit and burgeoning debt and puts in jeopardy Social Security and Medicare in the coming confrontation over the debt limit.</p></blockquote><p>Jim Moran, Va., also more liberal, <a href="http://moran.house.gov/press-release/moran-statement-fiscal-cliff-legislation">argued</a> that the bill just paves the way for three more showdowns over the budget:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/who_were_the_democrats_who_voted_against_fiscal_cliff_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/who_were_the_democrats_who_voted_against_fiscal_cliff_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dying to take a celebrity photo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dying_to_take_a_celebrity_photo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dying_to_take_a_celebrity_photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paparazzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Bieber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An amateur photographer is hit by a car snapping a photo of the singer's white Ferrari -- and he wasn't even in it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what immediately qualifies as the worst way to die of the new year thus far, a Los Angeles paparazzo was killed Tuesday while trying to obtain photographs … of Justin Bieber's car.</p><p>Bieber was reportedly <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/01/01/justin-bieber-ferrari-paparazzo-killed/ ">not even in his white Ferrari</a> when it was pulled over by California Highway Patrol for speeding — a friend of the singer was behind the wheel while Bieber was elsewhere. But the car – and Bieber's vehicular comings and goings – are familiar to local lensmen. In November, Judge Thomas Rubinson dismissed a reckless driving charge against photographer Paul Raef, who in July was involved in a high-speed freeway chase in pursuit of Bieber. At the time, Raef's frantic driving, at speeds over 80 mph, prompted several 911 calls. But Robinson ruled that a 2010 law meant to curtail that kind of potentially dangerous behavior, "in pursuit of photos for commercial gain," could conflict with legitimate First Amendment-protected news gathering.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dying_to_take_a_celebrity_photo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dying_to_take_a_celebrity_photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fiscal cliff&#8221; deal paves way for potential debt ceiling fight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/fiscal_cliff_deal_sets_up_potential_debt_ceiling_fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/fiscal_cliff_deal_sets_up_potential_debt_ceiling_fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Tax Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's fiscal cliff "victory" may be short-lived as another showdown with the House GOP is already on the horizon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress was able to eke out a deal to pull the country back from the "fiscal cliff" last night, but likely teed itself up for an even bigger fight in two months over the debt ceiling.</p><p>The plan that passed will raise $620 billion in revenue over 10 years and pay down the sequester for two months. It only got 85 votes from House Republicans, with 151 voting against it. Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., was one of the more notable yes votes, though House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., and House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., both voted against it.</p><p>And though the deal pulls the country back from painful fiscal cliff cuts, it's only temporary. The sequester is paid down for two months, not-so-coincidentally timed with when the government will reach its spending limit and Congress will have to vote to raise the debt ceiling.</p><p>From the <a href="http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2013-01-02-Fiscal%20Cliff/id-e6d155e3807c4f9a85b555f8b96430b5">AP</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/fiscal_cliff_deal_sets_up_potential_debt_ceiling_fight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/fiscal_cliff_deal_sets_up_potential_debt_ceiling_fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexy dresses that barely fit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/sexy_dresses_that_barely_fit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/sexy_dresses_that_barely_fit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burlesque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weight Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weight Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've struggled with extra weight for years. But I've learned the power of sparkly makeup, Diet Coke and acceptance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past two years, I’ve lost more than a hundred pounds. There’s nothing impressive about this feat — it’s not as if I’ve lost the hundred-plus pounds sensibly, sequentially and permanently. Rather, I’ve lost the same five pounds about 20 different times through a series of dubious dietary stunts.</p><p>Per the established metrics of weight-to-height ratio and body mass index, I’m not what a medical professional would call exceedingly overweight — though Hollywood, Madison Avenue and the average “thinspiration” Pinterest page would post dissenting opinion. Essentially, I’m your garden-variety mesomorph who doesn’t eat to live but, rather, who lives to eat her feelings.</p><p>What consumes me, urging me to mindlessly consume? Usually nothing special — like so many other people, I nosh my way through shame and regret about the past and anxiety about the future. But 2011 and 2012 were exceptional — annus horribilis, times two: I got dragged off by a riptide of depression that I feared might kill me; one of my sisters learned she had lupus; one of my in-laws was diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer; my mother’s COPD landed her in the hospital, and my beloved bachelor uncle fell ill under conditions too horrible to describe and died eight months later. It was not a good couple of years for illusions of familial immortality. No.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/sexy_dresses_that_barely_fit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/sexy_dresses_that_barely_fit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>