<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Elections 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/elections_2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous 2012: a year in review</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/anonymous_2012_a_year_in_review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/anonymous_2012_a_year_in_review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunter moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Pillar of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bahrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anaheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police brutality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megaupload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Dawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippine cybercrime prevention act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a busy year for the global hacktivist collective Anonymous
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2012, the loose association of tech-based activists protested bullying, LGBT discrimination, corporate media, Israel, <a href="http://anonnews.org/press/item/1720/">Muslim genocide</a>, police brutality, election-rigging, douchebaggery/bullying, surveillance, nationalist education, and of course Internet censorship—expanding both the range of its “causes” and the tools it deployed to defend them.</p><p>Of course, it’s impossible to say with certainty which actions "Anonymous" actually pulled off, since its membership is ill-defined and anyone can claim association, not to mention that sometimes Anonymous hacktivists act alone or as part of a subgroup.  Even when Anonymous has put out one of its quintessential videos claiming responsibility for a hack or DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service—shutting down a website by flooding it with requests) attack, it hasn’t always turned out to be true.</p><p>Given that, below are Anonymous’ “Top 20” for 2012. With its widening arsenal and focus, one can only imagine what these Internet denizens have in store for 2013.</p><p>[slide_show id=13151256]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/anonymous_2012_a_year_in_review/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/anonymous_2012_a_year_in_review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 for &#8217;12: The year in politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12 people who defined the last 12 months of American politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To close out 2012, I’ve looked back at each month and selected one individual who loomed large in the news and whose story tells us something significant about the year in politics. This is an admittedly imprecise exercise. Not all months are created equally. There are some months when multiple people could have been chosen; in other months, the pickings were slim. And in some cases, the names I’ve chosen offer a reminder that in political journalism, what seems vitally important one day can seem trivial the next.  Anyway, on to the list:</p><p><strong>January: Newt Gingrich</strong></p><p>To anyone who’d just been teleported from the year 1999, the scene in Charleston, South Carolina on the night of January 21 had to be impossible to fathom: There was Newt Gingrich, the man who’d been marched off the political stage by his own party after a disastrous four-year run as House Speaker, declaring victory in a Republican presidential primary. And not just any primary: South Carolina, a historically pivotal early contest. And not just a victory – an absolute landslide.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much did Sheldon Adelson spend on the 2012 election?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_much_did_sheldon_adelson_spend_on_the_2012_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_much_did_sheldon_adelson_spend_on_the_2012_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Adelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We may never know the exact figure, but it's a safe bet that he spent more than he originally pledged to beat Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" align="left" /></a> Exactly how much, you ask?</p><p>We don't really know, and it's likely we never will. Many of the groups that spent the most on the election aren't required to report their donors. But thanks to recent campaign finance filings, we can get a better idea.</p><p>We dug through Federal Election Commission and Internal Revenue Service records and found that Adelson and his wife, Miriam, spent at least $98 million this election cycle. The money went to at least 34 different candidates and groups, with contributions ranging from $2,000 for a Florida congressional candidate to $30 million for <a href="http://restoreourfuture.com/about">Restore Our Future</a>, the super PAC that supported Mitt Romney.</p><p>Adelson also gave $20 million to <a href="http://www.winningourfuture.com/">Winning Our Future</a>, a super PAC backing Newt Gingrich; $23 million to <a href="http://www.americancrossroads.org/about/">American Crossroads</a>, a conservative super PAC; and $5 million each to the <a href="http://www.congressionalleadershipfund.org/about/">Congressional Leadership Fund</a> and the <a href="http://ygaction.com/about-yg/">YG Action Fund</a>, both of which supported Republican candidates for Congress.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_much_did_sheldon_adelson_spend_on_the_2012_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_much_did_sheldon_adelson_spend_on_the_2012_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney wins &#8220;lie of the year&#8221; award</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/romney_wins_lie_of_the_year_award/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/romney_wins_lie_of_the_year_award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politifact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney's claim that Jeep is moving production to China earned him the nod from PolitiFact ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PolitiFact awarded its “<a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/dec/12/lie-year-2012-Romney-Jeeps-China/">lie of the year</a>" award this morning, and the winner is Mitt Romney, specifically his claim that Jeep is moving U.S. production to China.</p><p>Here’s is the ad that delivered the win to Romney:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0dnfed-DjKo?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Despite outrage from the media and the public, and a denial from Jeep’s parent company, the Romney campaign stood by the claim.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/romney_wins_lie_of_the_year_award/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/romney_wins_lie_of_the_year_award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defense of 2016 speculation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/in_defense_of_2016_speculation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/in_defense_of_2016_speculation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it's annoying only a month removed from the last election, but now's when possible candidates start to emerge]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> Over at <em>The Atlantic</em>, Conor Friedersdorf mocks the breathless 2016 speculation with a <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/12/the-race-begins-gearing-up-for-the-2048-presidential-election/266005/">post</a> "gearing up for the 2048 presidential election." It's genuinely funny:</p><blockquote><p>Although it is still early, Mitt Romney, who has 16 grandchildren, is leading among the patriarchs of America's dynastic political families, in part due to the present childlessness of George P. Bush and Chelsea Clinton, whose presence in articles on this subject is an apparent journalistic convention. Starting families now could give the hypothetical grandchildren of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton a head start on the theoretical grandchildren of Barack Obama, whose daughters are years away from having children if they decide to procreate at all.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/in_defense_of_2016_speculation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/in_defense_of_2016_speculation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the right-wing media bubble impenetrable?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_the_right_wing_media_bubble_impenetrable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_the_right_wing_media_bubble_impenetrable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly a month after their blow-out defeat, Republicans still refuse to confront their demographic challenges]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Republicans are responding to their recent losses not by moderating their rhetoric or rethinking their policy preferences, but by retreating deeper into the conservative bubble -- and hardening it lest any objective reality intrude.</p><p>In the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, William McGurn <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324469304578143344246556774.html">approached the idea</a> that villifying half the country as lazy “takers” dependent on the largesse of the makers may not be a way to win over the masses. He wrote, “Maybe Americans who have reason to feel insecure about their futures don't find a government that promises to be there for them when they need it all that menacing.” But he then rejects the notion and calls for better propaganda. “Conservatives' top priority,” he writes, “should be promoting an alternative—that in a highly competitive, global economy, the only real economic security for ordinary Americans is the security of opportunity.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_the_right_wing_media_bubble_impenetrable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_the_right_wing_media_bubble_impenetrable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s next for the anti-abortion movement?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/whats_next_for_the_anti_abortion_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/whats_next_for_the_anti_abortion_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heartbeat Bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After an election night thrashing, the movement hopes to make its message more palatable to the public]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohio's Heartbeat Bill, which would have banned abortion as early as six weeks, is dead, and it's all Mitt Romney's fault. So much for the heart-shaped <a href="http://christiannews.net/2012/11/28/ohio-republican-senate-president-tom-niehaus-stops-heartbeat-bill-and-move-to-defund-planned-parenthood/">balloons</a> and the circus-like spectacle of a fetus "testifying" in the form of a live ultrasound before the legislature. But can the state that remains a bellwether for presidential elections tell us what's to come in the next abortion-rights battles?</p><p>This week, Ohio's Republican Senate president, Tom Niehaus, explicitly took President Obama's win as a referendum on abortion rights, saying he'd told supporters that he would only allow a vote on the bill in the event of a Romney victory. He also said the bill's proponents were incredibly annoying, including to people ostensibly on their side.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/whats_next_for_the_anti_abortion_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/whats_next_for_the_anti_abortion_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should churches be used as polling spots?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/should_churches_be_used_as_polling_spots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/should_churches_be_used_as_polling_spots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13106374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voters from North Carolina to Minnesota have complained of their overt political messaging on Election Day ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.americanindependent.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/TheAmericanIndependent.jpg" alt="The American Independent" align="left" /></a> In South Saint Paul, Minn., on Election Day, residents showed up at St. John Vianney Catholic Church to vote and were greeted with a banner outside the polling place entrance that read, “Strengthen Marriage, Don’t Redefine It.”</p><p>Minnesota was voting on a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, and the Catholic Church had been the most vocal proponent of the ballot measure.</p><p>Voters snapped photos of the banner, which quickly gained attention on Twitter and Facebook.</p><p>Ivan Kowalenko took one of those photos. He told Minnesota Public Radio, “I was shocked, I didn’t think that would be allowed. I was hearing that you’re not allowed to wear any political slogan of your own, so it doesn’t seem entirely appropriate that a voting venue would be allowed to express an opinion.”</p><p>At a separate polling place at St. Joseph’s Church in West St. Paul, Stephanie Weiss was waiting in line to vote, and she noticed a sign posted to the wall. It was a prayer, written by Twin Cities Archbishop John Nienstedt, that urged Catholics to defend God’s plan for marriage — between one man and one woman.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/should_churches_be_used_as_polling_spots/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/should_churches_be_used_as_polling_spots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Mitt suckered his fat-cat donors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/how_mitt_suckered_his_fat_cat_donors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/how_mitt_suckered_his_fat_cat_donors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contrary to reports, the Romney camp probably wasn't terribly surprised by the election results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The big chin-scratching story in the aftermath of the 2012 campaign is that the Romney-Ryan campaign was “shell-shocked” by its loss to Barack Obama. "I don't think there was one person who saw this coming," a senior adviser to the campaign <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57547239/adviser-romney-shellshocked-by-loss/">told CBS</a>. “There's nothing worse than when you think you're going to win, and you don't,” said another. “It was like a sucker punch."</p><p>The most likely explanation for that yawning disconnect is that the campaign figured it was better to appear to be entirely clueless about the race than acknowledge that it had been bullshitting its fat-cat donors about Romney's chances of winning in order to keep the cash spigot open.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/how_mitt_suckered_his_fat_cat_donors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/how_mitt_suckered_his_fat_cat_donors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 reasons Republicans think their party&#8217;s dysfunctional</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/10_reasons_republicans_think_their_partys_dysfunctional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/10_reasons_republicans_think_their_partys_dysfunctional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of Mitt's defeat, Republicans are still searching for answers -- but they all agree they hate Karl Rove]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Just as the Republican Party might have contemplated an end to its wound-licking (the better to gin up its scandal-making machine for President Barack Obama’s second term), vanquished Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney proved to be -- for liberals, at least -- the gift that keeps on giving.</p><p>The president, Romney told a group of campaign donors on a November 14 conference call, won re-election by promising free stuff to his homeboys and women’s libbers and brown people who inconveniently declined to self-deport -- or words to that effect.</p><p>“What the president -- president's campaign did was focus on certain members of his base coalition, give them extraordinary financial gifts from the government,” Romney told his fat cats, apparently unaware that <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/15/nation/la-na-romney-donors-20121115">reporters</a> were listening in. Soon that particular cat leapt out of the proverbial bag, and it was the 47 percent all over again -- offering a vision of the majority of the electorate that voted for Obama as a bunch of moochers. The one difference, of course, was that no longer the party’s presidential contender, Romney learned that Republicans were free to kick him to the curb, which they did with steel-toed boots.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/10_reasons_republicans_think_their_partys_dysfunctional/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/10_reasons_republicans_think_their_partys_dysfunctional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory for strangers, heathens, wastrels!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class warfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans counted on tried-and-true class warfare like never before. This time, "outsiders" were the majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we get to the persistence of class warfare in our politics, let’s talk about Skinch Painter. In 1900, when the San Francisco Examiner tracked him down, he was 78, “hale, hearty, and contented.” He hadn’t inherited a penny, but neither had he worked a day in his life. “He has never borrowed a dollar, nor stolen one,” the column read. “He has never been a tramp nor a beggar. He has never done a day’s work in exchange for money ... Yet he has lived.”</p><p>One day, when he was in his teens, he said to himself, “Look here, Skinch Painter, this old world owes you a living, and all you’ve got to do is collect it.” Wandering the Ozarks of Missouri, he inhabited a cave and relied on nature for his food and clothing. He hunted, fished and gathered nuts and berries, wearing only animal skins and going barefoot.</p><p>“Labor is a useless sin,” said Skinch. “The time a man spends working is just so much time lost from living.”</p><p>We can just about see Fox News sending a camera crew out to interview Skinch, and one of its handsomely paid straight men wrapping up the piece with an offhand, “See, you don’t need government handouts. If you don’t want to work, you can do what this guy does. At least he’s not a taker. The rest of us in this country, we’ll continue to work for a living.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives&#8217; crisis of confidence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/conservatives_crisis_of_confidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/conservatives_crisis_of_confidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weeks after the election, the right is still lashing out. Are Republicans doomed to their own echo chamber?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> As Democrats continue to bask in the post-election schadenfreude of watching Republicans weep and gnash their teeth at losing the presidential election, the sense that conservatives are the architects of their own misery is only enhancing liberal glee. It seems the initial shock hasn’t warn off: In a conference call with his fundraising team, Mitt Romney <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/romney-blames-loss-on-obamas-gifts-to-minorities-and-young-voters/">is still blaming his loss</a> on those freeloading Americans who wanted stuff.</p><p>Clearly, the only explanation for all this delusion is that conservative media and campaign consultants, steeped in years of confidently lying about everything from global warming to the causes of the deficit, got a little too bold about their ability to create their own realities. The only question is whether conservatives will learn their lesson and exhibit more skepticism about their self-selected news media in the future.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/conservatives_crisis_of_confidence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/conservatives_crisis_of_confidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s first class-warfare election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/americas_first_class_warfare_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/americas_first_class_warfare_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Adelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never has a presidential candidate so brazenly embraced the interests of the 1%. Mitt Romney may be the last ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> In 2012, class warfare broke out in American politics. And from the president to key Senate races, the middle class won.</p><p>When the 2012 campaign began, the lousy economy made President Obama vulnerable. Republicans were favored to take back the Senate, given retirements in conservative states. Republican billionaires — the Koch brothers, Adelson and others — put up big money in the effort to have it all. Instead the president swept to victory, and Democrats gained seats in the Senate and the House.</p><p>Many factors contributed. Republicans learned once more the shortcomings of a stale, male, pale, Southern-based party in a nation of diversity. The GOP “legitimate rape” caucus helped give away two Senate seats. But too little attention has been paid to the new emerging reality. This was the first class warfare election of the new Gilded Age — and the middle class won big.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/americas_first_class_warfare_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/americas_first_class_warfare_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 signs the right is losing it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_signs_the_right_is_losing_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_signs_the_right_is_losing_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karl Rove's election-night meltdown has proven to be a harbinger of conservative freak-outs to come]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Last week on election night, we saw the right-wing media and its <a href="http://www.alternet.org/media/how-right-wing-medias-fantasy-world-caused-republican-meltdown-election-night">audience have a collective meltdown</a> after their fantasy world was shattered and Barack Obama won a second term. It was a big win for people who believe in numbers, and a loss for folks who prefer to have <a href="http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/5-very-bad-things-happened-karl-rove-just-2-days">Karl Rove lie to them</a>.</p><p>We had seen signs of stress within the party and its adherents leading to to the election, and since then we’ve seen everyone from members of the GOP elite to right-wing foot soldiers go through the first four Kübler-Ross stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, and depression. (Whether they’ll get to acceptance remains to be seen.)</p><p>Below are several examples of how conservatives at all levels have gone off the deep end in the days leading up to and following the election.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_signs_the_right_is_losing_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_signs_the_right_is_losing_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 right-wing election myths debunked by reality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/10_right_wing_election_myths_debunked_by_reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/10_right_wing_election_myths_debunked_by_reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2012, the conservative information bubble finally popped. Here's what they should have learned]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> One of the more stunning developments following President Obama’s re-election has been the number of ardent Republicans who have confessed that they <a href="http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/hopes-obamas-second-term?akid=9677.46423.zyIfWH&amp;rd=1&amp;src=newsletter743582&amp;t=7">believed</a> the anti-Democratic propaganda from Fox News—and got so much wrong as a result.</p><p>The voting rights part of this fact-averse bubble had many dimensions: from who is and isn’t registered to vote, to when and where people wanted to vote, to what a voter must do at the polls to get a ballot, to how voter lists are updated—and who can be trusted to oversee the process.</p><p>What follows are 10 lies the Right pedaled during the 2012 campaign. Some GOP partisans, like this Nevada <a href="http://ralstonreports.com/blog/clark-county-republicans-will-meet-assess-what-went-wrong-could-take-awhile#.UKKjToWWZlN">group</a>, are already trying to resurrect some of these fake issues. You can be sure you’ll see more as states and Congress look at 2012’s biggest problems, such as people having to wait hours and hours to vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/10_right_wing_election_myths_debunked_by_reality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/10_right_wing_election_myths_debunked_by_reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr. President, remember me? It&#8217;s Bill Ayers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/mr_president_remember_me_its_bill_ayers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/mr_president_remember_me_its_bill_ayers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Ayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One request for President obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know presidents don't force progress as much as respond to the fire from below. Still, this is one change we need]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a backpack filled to overflowing with grievance and discontent, dissent and demand, as well as wild hopes and radical aspirations: end the wars and the drone strikes, slash the pentagon, fight for universal health care, tear down these walls, recognize and stand with the poor and the working class, assail poverty, put teeth into global warming measures -- the list goes on and on.</p><p>But I also know that the president is neither a sovereign nor a king, and most of us spend way too much time and energy staring dumbly at the sites of power we have no access to -- the White House, for example -- wringing our hands and hoping for the best, and far too little time focusing on the prospective power right in front of us: the community and the street, the school and the classroom, the shop and the workplace. Our job is to organize dissent and mobilize an independent movement. Remember: Lyndon Johnson was never part of the Black Freedom Movement, FDR was not a labor leader, and Lincoln never joined an abolitionist party -- each is remembered for important actions taken in response to fire from below. Even in the last years it was women, gay, immigrant-rights and environmental activists who moved a progressive agenda forward inch by inch.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/mr_president_remember_me_its_bill_ayers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/mr_president_remember_me_its_bill_ayers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear angry white conservatives: Chill out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/dear_angry_white_conservatives_chill_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/dear_angry_white_conservatives_chill_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All is not lost with Romney's defeat -- but it may be time to tune into a different news station]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Dear angry white conservatives who are mourning Mitt Romney’s loss,</p><p>If Fox News is any indication, many of you are dismayed, upset, and befuddled by Mitt Romney’s loss to President Obama. Some of these feelings are normal. Politics is tribal. When your team loses, a bit of sadness is expected.</p><p>However, some white folks are acting out in some very unhealthy ways. Young white conservatives participated in a near riot at the University of Mississippi, where they hurled rocks at bystanders, used racial slurs, and burned Obama and Biden campaign signs. Other angry white folks used the Internet to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/nov/09/mapping-racist-tweets-president-obama-reelection" target="_blank">send out racist messages and pictures on Twitter</a> as an act of protest and anger at the country’s re-election of its first Black president. I believe that these events are malicious outliers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/dear_angry_white_conservatives_chill_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/dear_angry_white_conservatives_chill_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four more years &#8212; of gridlock!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13070971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six billion dollars of campaign spending later, America is right back where it started]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fall of 1948, Harry Truman barnstormed the country by train, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1948#General_election" target="_blank">repeatedly bashing</a> a “do-nothing Congress,” and so snatched victory from the jaws of <a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HemMnHs7SCg/TNNNmocp1cI/AAAAAAAAAmc/kMSFG2loNtQ/s320/dewey-truman-1948.jpg" target="_blank">defeat</a> in that year’s presidential campaign.  This year, neither presidential candidate focused on blasting a do-nothing Congress or, in Obama’s case, “Republican obstructionism,” demanding that the voters give them a legislative body that would mean an actual mandate for change.</p><p>We now know the results of such a campaign and, after all the tumult and the nation’s first <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2012/10/2012-election-spending-will-reach-6.html" target="_blank">$6 billion election</a>, they couldn’t be more familiar.  Only days later, you can watch a remarkably recognizable cast of characters from the reelected president and Speaker of the House John Boehner to the massed pundits of the mainstream media picking up the pages of a well-thumbed script.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello, Mr. President? It&#8217;s me, Roger Ebert</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/hello_mr_president_its_me_roger_ebert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/hello_mr_president_its_me_roger_ebert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One request for President obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn Castle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we need an emergency education program, investing in basics — and not $60 million high school stadiums]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would ask the president for an emergency education program. Our students at every level are below American historical norms and global standards. We're importing the best and the brightest from overseas, from nations that may not spend as much money on education but seem to produce better-prepared students.</p><p>I attended a Catholic grade school for eight years in the 1950s. When my class graduated, all of us (even the "slower" students) whizzed through public high school rhetoric so easily our new teachers remarked on it. Our school was poverty-stricken and had only basic facilities. But every one of us could read, write and do math. I believe we could read and write better than many of today's high school graduates, and some of today's colleges graduates.</p><p>Reading is the key to self-education. Let me give an example that has been obsessing me. Nearly 50 percent of all Americans reject the Theory of Evolution and believe Man was "created" pretty much in his present form some thousands of years ago. Anyone who believes that hasn't been paying attention.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/hello_mr_president_its_me_roger_ebert/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/hello_mr_president_its_me_roger_ebert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 newscasters who humiliated themselves on-air</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/5_newscasters_who_humiliated_themselves_on_air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/5_newscasters_who_humiliated_themselves_on_air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diane sawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you thought Diane Sawyer was a hot mess on election night, wait 'till you see meteorologist Walter Kelly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" align="left" /></a> Was ABC's Diane Sawyer <a href="http://www.thefix.com/content/diane-sawyer-drunk-election90874" target="_blank">drunk on election night</a>? Unsurprisingly, her reps say no. “Diane’s fine, she’s exhausted,”<a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/diane-sawyer-s-rep-slams-rumors-she-was-drunk-or-on-drugs-on-election-night" target="_blank"> said </a>a spokesperson. “Diane's been up for days and she's had many sleepless nights. She was covering the hurricane and then preparing for the election broadcast.” Reasonable explanation, though "exhausted" is often a PR code for snoggered. <em>Fix </em>readers took a snap poll<a href="http://www.thefix.com/content/diane-sawyer-drunk-election90874" target="_blank"> and were highly skeptical</a>—with 59% deeming that the anchor was indeed under the influence. Whatever the cause, her slurred request for ABC's election theme song when President “Orama” won Minnesota has earned Sawyer an eternal spot in the pantheon of (<em>alleged</em>) boozecasters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/5_newscasters_who_humiliated_themselves_on_air/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/5_newscasters_who_humiliated_themselves_on_air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>