<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > endorsement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/endorsement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Free market defenders agree: Vote Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/free_market_defenders_agree_vote_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/free_market_defenders_agree_vote_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did the Financial Times and other defenders of the free market endorse Obama? Because Romney can't be trusted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's easy to have fun with the news that two stalwart defenders of the free market, <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/f11742fa-2501-11e2-8924-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2BHaUclbb">the Financial Times</a> and <a href="http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one">the Economist,</a> have both endorsed that crazy Muslim socialist Barack Obama for president of the United States.</p><p>But that's not the surprising part. Both publications endorsed Obama in 2008. Both are willing to (grudgingly) compliment the president for arresting the plummet toward an economic depression, and both are reasonably happy with his calm approach to foreign policy.</p><p>What's surprising is that they didn't endorse Romney. Because they desperately, desperately would have loved to do so, if Mitt had just given them one good reason. The Economist headline captures this regret: "America could do better than Barack Obama; sadly, Mitt Romney does not fit the bill."</p><p><em>Sadly!</em> One gets a strong visual image here of an English peer of the realm, tapping the ash off his stogie while staring moodily at a map of the world, and declaiming: "The British Empire had so much to offer; <em>sadly</em> those ungrateful wretches in the colonies wanted nothing of it."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/free_market_defenders_agree_vote_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/free_market_defenders_agree_vote_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
