<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Enron</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/enron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Our outrageous Enron-style justice system</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/our_enron_style_justice_system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/our_enron_style_justice_system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Skilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Too Big to Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Taibbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Skilling's reduced sentence exposes old and new double standards poisoning how America treats defendants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/are_banks_too_big_to_jail/">Too Big to Jail</a> - and now there is Too Big to Keep In Jail.</p><p>This is the envelope-pushing precedent being set by the Justice Department in its dealings with convicted Enron executive Jeffrey Skilling - a.k.a. one of the hucksters whose rip-off schemes were responsible for, among other things, losing more than <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/10/news/companies/enron-skilling/">$2 billion</a> of retirees' pension funds.</p><p>In a revised sentencing agreement announced late last week, federal prosecutors cited the "extraordinary resources" required to litigate Skilling's appeals as justification for reducing his sentence by more than 10 years. <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/business/former-enron-ceo-jeff-skilling-may-leave-prison-2017-1C9846371">NBC News</a> reports that in exchange, "Skilling would give up all of his remaining rights to appeal" and "he also would give up any claims to the $40 million he was ordered to forfeit" to the Enron victims fund. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/09/us-enron-skilling-victims-idUSBRE94818B20130509">Reuters</a> notes that such a sum - which will be handed over to a "depleted" victims fund - "pales in comparison" to the "$70 million Skilling has spent on legal fees."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/our_enron_style_justice_system/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/our_enron_style_justice_system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deal with Justice Department could reduce ex-Enron CEO&#8217;s sentence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/possible_deal_could_impact_ex_enron_ceos_sentence_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/possible_deal_could_impact_ex_enron_ceos_sentence_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Skilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/possible_deal_could_impact_ex_enron_ceos_sentence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Skilling is currently facing 24 years in jail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOUSTON (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department says it is discussing possibly entering into an agreement with former Enron Corp. CEO Jeffrey Skilling which might reduce his prison sentence of more than 24 years.</p><p>The possibility of a sentencing agreement was made public this week in a notice to victims of Enron's collapse.</p><p>The notice does not specify how Skilling's sentence could be impacted if an agreement is reached.</p><p>A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment. Skilling's attorney did not immediate return a phone call or email seeking comment.</p><p>Skilling was convicted in 2006 for his role in Enron's downfall and sentenced to more than 24 years.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/possible_deal_could_impact_ex_enron_ceos_sentence_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/possible_deal_could_impact_ex_enron_ceos_sentence_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street power player: We&#8217;re incentivized to cheat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/wall_street_power_player_were_incentivized_to_cheat_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/wall_street_power_player_were_incentivized_to_cheat_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Chanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Black]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Chanos, an early detector of Enron's fraudulent practices, explains our dysfunctional banking system]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> Hustlers. Cheaters. Crooks. American business has always had them, and sometimes they’ve been punished. But today, those who cheat and put the rest of us at risk are often getting off scot-free. The <a href="http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/178_45/transcript-attorney-general-eric-holder-on-too-big-to-jail-1057295-1.html">recent admission of Attorney General Eric Holder</a> that systemically dangerous megabanks may escape prosecution because of their size has opened a new chapter in fraud history. If you know your company won’t be prosecuted, a perverse logic says that you <em>should </em>cheat and make as much money for shareholders as you can.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/wall_street_power_player_were_incentivized_to_cheat_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/wall_street_power_player_were_incentivized_to_cheat_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Citigroup stays fraud-proof</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/08/how_citigroup_stays_fraud_proof/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/08/how_citigroup_stays_fraud_proof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13005224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the lawyer who keeps getting the financial services company off the hook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> It’s one of the few things that's predictable on Wall Street; an immutable signature on the reply briefs whenever Citigroup is charged with fraud – and that is quite often.</p><p>Brad Karp, a partner at the 737-attorney-strong Wall Street law firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &amp; Garrison LLP, has been Citigroup’s go-to guy for fraud allegations since the company was born out of the too-big-to-fail merger of Travelers Group insurance, its myriad Wall Street investment banks, brokerage units, and Citicorp, parent of Citibank.</p><p>When the London-based private equity firm, Terra Firma, claimed it had been lied to and defrauded by Citigroup, making it overpay for the purchase of EMI, a British music label, in 2007, Karp and colleagues wrung an 8-0 decision from the jury in favor of Citigroup. Karp was also on hand to witness victory when the trustee for the bankrupt Italian dairy giant, Parmalat, charged Citigroup with fraud. Then there were fraud charges connected to Citigroup’s involvement in the collapse of WorldCom AND Enron -- along with auction rate securities, rigged stock research and understating its exposure to subprime debt by $39 billion. Karp, Karp, and more Karp.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/08/how_citigroup_stays_fraud_proof/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/08/how_citigroup_stays_fraud_proof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s Freudian tweet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newspaper declares Enron-inspired Sarbanes-Oxley law struck down by Supreme Court. Er, not so fast]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal has never made any attempt to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704431804574539921864252380.html">hide</a> its <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574571662869948676.html">antipathy</a> for Sarbanes-Oxley, the Enron/Worldcom-inspired law that attempted to increase oversight on public company accounting. The Journal's position is that the law imposed costs on businesses that hurt the overall economy. Since this is the Journal's editorial position on <em>any</em> legislation that tries to rein in the business world, no one was ever required to take their rantings too seriously (even though, it is true, Sarbanes-Oxley has resulted in compliance costs that can be challenging for smaller public firms).</p><p>So perhaps that explains why the Wall Street Journal's <a href="http://twitter.com/WSJ">flagship Twitter feed</a> (as pointed out by <a href="http://twitter.com/felixsalmon/status/17261134045">Felix Salmon</a>) jumped the gun this morning, reporting via <a href="http://twitter.com/WSJ/statuses/17257780737">a tweet practically dripping with glee</a> that Sarbanes-Oxley had finally been vanquished!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Abramoff, Eliot Spitzer: A tale of two swindlers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casino Jack and the United States of Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What connects the disgraced N.Y. governor and the jailed D.C. lobbyist? Oscar-winner Alex Gibney explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the following have in common: Imprisoned Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff, disgraced ex-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, the collapse of Enron, the Bush administration's torture policies, the late gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson? Before we go chasing some thread of thematic continuity -- and we could definitely do that -- let's observe the emotional connection. All of those people and things provoke or embody big, visceral reactions: shock, outrage, disgust, amazement.</p><p>The other thing they have in common, of course, is <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">Alex Gibney,</a> who has made movies about all those subjects, including the Oscar-winner <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/04/30/tribeca_2">"Taxi to the Dark Side,"</a> the box-office breakthrough <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2005/04/21/enron/index.html">"Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room"</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/index.html">"Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson,"</a> which wasn't a big hit but strikes me as a key work in understanding what Gibney is up to. He thrives on those oversize emotions mentioned above, channeling them into intentionally ambiguous pop documentaries that inhabit a nuanced middle ground between journalism and entertainment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive Alex Gibney clip: Jack Abramoff and healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casino Jack and the United States of Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/04/30/gibney_clip</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See a deleted scene from Oscar-winner Alex Gibney's new movie about the guy who dosed Congress with dirty money]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an exclusive premiere for Film Salon readers, here's a deleted scene from Oscar-winning director <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">Alex Gibney's</a> upcoming documentary <a href="http://www.takepart.com/casinojack">"Casino Jack and the United States of Money."</a> The film recounts the horrifying, mesmerizing saga of &#252;ber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the congressional corruption scandal of the late '90s and early 2000s that dramatically changed the landscape of Washington (and definitely not for the better).</p><p>In this Webisode, Gibney explores the elaborate money shuffle through which Abramoff channeled money from supposedly legitimate lobbying clients (like Indian tribes) through Republican PACs and Big Pharma front groups, who in turn wrote industry-friendly legislation that was passed intact by the GOP-led Congress. I'll have an interview with Gibney and more coverage of the film next week. "Casino Jack and the United States of Money" opens May 7 in major cities, but you'll only find this clip here (at least until the DVD comes out).</p><p>     <object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9S_DigsLilU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9S_DigsLilU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560"></embed></object>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time for Wall Street to pay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/wall_street_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/wall_street_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/03/17/wall_street</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need accountability -- as in, jail time where warranted -- for those who created the financial disaster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost everybody's got their noses out of joint these days -- and no wonder. If there's a significant American institution that hasn't failed in its fundamental public responsibility over the past decade, it'd be hard to identify.</p><p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1971133_1971110_1971117,00.html">Writing in Time</a>, Christopher Hayes puts it succinctly: "Nearly every pillar institution in American society -- whether it's General Motors, Congress, Wall Street, Major League Baseball, the Catholic Church or the mainstream media -- has revealed itself to be corrupt, incompetent or both. And at the root of these failures are the people who run these institutions, the bright and industrious minds who occupy the commanding heights of our meritocratic order."</p><p>Me, I blame the combination of runaway baseball salaries, the "talented and gifted" movement in schools, and the tyranny of SAT scores. I'm only half-joking. Once free agency drove even an average third baseman's pay into the seven-figure range formerly reserved for tycoons who owned major industries or medium-size Midwestern states, practically everybody with SAT scores over 1,400 figured they deserved to earn as much as Aramis Ramirez.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/wall_street_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/wall_street_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sundance: Searing portrait of a top lobbyist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance Film Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/01/29/gibney_video</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar-winner Alex Gibney talks about his new Jack Abramoff expos]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PARK CITY, Utah -- Alex Gibney's new documentary, "Casino Jack and the United States of Money," which premiered at Sundance this week, is much more than a shocking and highly entertaining movie about Jack Abramoff, the &#252;ber-lobbyist at the center of the biggest corruption scandal in congressional history. It's a portrait of a political system that has been poisoned down to the root by the pernicious influence of big money, by the buying and selling of connections and influence, and by a radical free-market ideology that has been systematically employed to undermine the principles of representative democracy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grayson apologizes for &#8220;K street whore&#8221; comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Grayson, D-Fla.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/10/27/grayson_apology</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Florida Democrat says he's sorry for a derogatory remark about an advisor to Ben Bernanke]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., has a habit of being outspoken -- and that's putting it mildly. It's made him <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/feature/2009/10/02/grayson/">a star on the left</a> recently, but it's also led to two fairly high-profile apologies just this month.</p><p>A few weeks ago, Grayson apologized for likening the death of uninsured Americans to the Holocaust. On Tuesday, he apologized for a comment he made a month ago, during an interview the radical conspiracist and radio host Alex Jones. At the time, he had <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/10/27/grayson/index.html">called</a> Linda Robertson, an advisor to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke he'd had some differences with a "K Street whore."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Alan Grayson goes a comment too far</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Grayson, D-Fla.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steny Hoyer, D-Md.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/10/27/grayson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Going on a fringe radio show to call a public official a "whore"? Stay classy, congressman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some elected officials -- <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bT01mC9xSA">you know the ones</a> -- live on controversy. It&#8217;s one thing, of course, when you&#8217;re taking brave stands and challenging conventional wisdom. It&#8217;s another when, like Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., you&#8217;re going on wack-job conspiracy theory talk shows to call a fellow public servant a &#8220;whore.&#8221;</p><p>It was about a month ago that Grayson gave an interview to "The Alex Jones Show," which is home to a wide array of old-school right-wing conspiracy theorizing -- think the Bilderberg Group, Wall Street and Barack Obama conspiring to bring about the New World Order. You get the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGFw3hY20lM">idea</a>.</p><p>In the Jones interview, Grayson opined that Fed advisor Linda Robertson, with whom he has had some sharp exchanges, is a &#8220;K Street whore.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs CEO: If only we&#8217;d listened to Enron</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling showed Wall Street how it was broken. Their response? La, la, la -- we can't hear you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd Blankfein, the chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs, performed <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/text-goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd/story.aspx?guid={C6F573D0-DD4D-4DD1-95C4-2F396177405E}&amp;dist=msr_5">a reasonable facsimile of self-flagellation</a> in a speech delivered Tuesday in Washington to the Council of Institutional Investors. I imagine the general reaction to his analysis of where Wall Street went wrong would be: How come a smart guy like you didn't figure this out <em>before</em> you broke the global economy? But one section resonated with me:</p><blockquote> <p>Fourth, risk models failed to capture the risk inherent in off-balance sheet activities, such as Structured Investment Vehicles. It seems clear now that managers of companies with large off-balance sheet exposure didn't appreciate the full magnitude of the economic risks they were exposed to; equally worrying, their counterparties were unaware of the full extent of these vehicles and, therefore, could not accurately assess the risk of doing business. <em>Post Enron, that is quite amazing.</em></p> </blockquote><p>Italics mine. I once wrote, <a href="http://archive.salon.com/tech/col/leon/2002/01/19/enron_money/index.html">way back in the day,</a> that "Who knows -- [Enron CEO Ken] Lay might even go down in history as the man who broke Wall Street!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The corporate financiers are wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2008/09/19/market</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would they please shut up about the wonders of an unfettered free market? It's taxpayers who are paying the price for their greed -- again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that we're all about to take on hundreds of billions or perhaps a trillion dollars in new public debt to redeem the nation's super-smart corporate financiers, there is one thing I hope we can expect in addition to postponing the apocalypse. Will they all please shut up about the wonders of the unfettered free market and the horrors of big government? </p><p>For decades, the investment class and their mouthpieces in the conservative movement have been telling Americans that if only we repealed all those musty old New Deal rules and programs, then we could enjoy unprecedented prosperity. Repeated endlessly by the think tanks, magazines and academics of the right-wing machinery, this message eventually drowned out the reality-based ideas of the American liberal tradition. Although those were the ideas that had actually built this country over the past century, they were erased from public consciousness by a combination of amnesia and propaganda. </p><p>Amazingly, many and perhaps most Americans failed to perceive the deceptions in that propaganda, even after a series of horrific experiences with right-wing ideology run amok. We have been here before, after all -- or at least we have been somewhere that looked a lot like this, and not so long ago. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>156</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bedtime for &#8220;Gonzo&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex Gibney talks about his Oscar-winning "Taxi to the Dark Side" and his new look at Hunter S. Thompson, American hero. (Plus: Audio podcast.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <div class="art r" style="width: 175px"> <img class='wp-image-10043269' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/07/story7.jpg' /> <p class="caption"><strong><a target="new" href="http://media.salon.com/media/mp3/2008/07/conversations_gibney.mp3">Listen to the interview</a></strong></p> <p class="caption">Subscribe: <a target="new" href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=157190082">iTunes</a><br /> URL: </p> <p><img class='wp-image-10043271' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/07/conversations_article1.gif' /></div> <p>Gonzo journalism pioneer <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_S._Thompson">Hunter S. Thompson</a> and documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney don't seem like the most natural pairing, at least at first. Gibney's films, including the Oscar-winning <a href="/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">"Taxi to the Dark Side"</a> (which has produced an ugly dispute between Gibney and the film's distributor) and the Oscar-nominated <a href="/ent/movies/review/2005/04/21/enron/">"Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room,"</a> essentially present old-school investigative journalism, filtered through a pop sensibility. Gibney himself has compared his research-intensive work to archaeology, and I doubt anyone has ever described Thompson's work in those terms. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.salon.com/media/mp3/2008/07/conversations_gibney.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bear-Stearns recalls the glory days of Enron</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you make a company disappear? Easy: Just sic the news media on 'em.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Enron CEO Ken Lay testified in his criminal fraud trail in 2006, he accused the Wall Street Journal of <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/26/business/Enron.php">bringing down his company.</a><br /> <blockquote></p><p>"We thought The Wall Street Journal was on a witch hunt of Andy Fastow," Lay testified Tuesday, referring to a series of articles the newspaper published about the partnerships beginning in October 2001. </p><p>"It was absolutely destroying the confidence investors had in the company and driving down the stock price," he added. </p><p>A time-honored ploy! Blame the media! Today, Bear-Stearns CEO Alan Schwarz attempted the same maneuver, <a href="http://www.muckraked.com/wordpress/2008/04/03/bear-stearns-ceo-blames-media-echo-of-rumors-and-speculation/">according to Muckraked,</a> which obtained a copy of his prepared testimony for a congressional hearing held Thursday.<br /> <blockquote></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s monumental fall from grace</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the post-dot-com, post-Enron era, the attorney general of New York landed some uppercuts on the high and mighty. But now he's the one lying on the mat. By his own hand.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> <p>"I acted in a way that violated my obligation to my family." </p> <p>Eliot Spitzer, governor of New York</p> </blockquote><p>As a reporter and editor who spent a good part of his career critically covering the excesses of the dot-com economy and the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/col/leon/2002/01/19/enron_money/">Enron era of runaway greed,</a> the emergence in the early 2000s of Eliot Spitzer as a crusading attorney general, clad in shining armor and pointing his lance directly at Wall Street's biggest fat cats, was an unexpected dream. While the politicians in Washington were betraying every trust, Spitzer had the effrontery to act as if he had a responsibility to prevent the powerful from profiting at the expense of the rest of us. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why did Gonzales resign?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//blumenthal/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without Karl Rove around to give him his orders, and with the investigations closing in, "Fredo" had nowhere to turn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Alberto Gonzales swiftly turned heel on the stage at the Department of Justice without answering questions about his resignation as attorney general he left behind yet another lingering cloud of mystery. What is he not telling about his resignation? </p><p> The true story may be something like the denouement of Edgar Allan Poe's "The Purloined Letter," which was in plain sight all along, a solution that can, as Poe wrote, "escape observation by dint of being excessively obvious; and here the physical oversight is precisely analogous with the moral inapprehension by which the intellect suffers to pass unnoticed those considerations which are too obtrusively and too palpably self-evident." To be excessively obvious, Gonzales' resignation, following <a href=http://dir.salon.com/topics/karl_rove/>Karl Rove</a>'s exactly by two weeks, is the shadow of the first act. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The long arms of Enron reach beyond the grave</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/06/amaranth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/06/amaranth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2007/07/06/amaranth</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate's report on the rise and fall of the hedge fund Amaranth is a case study in the dangers of unregulated markets. And Enron is largely to blame]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hsgac.senate.gov/_files/062507Report.pdf">"Excessive Speculation in the Natural Gas Market,"</a> a 139-page report released June 25 by the United States Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, is a masterpiece of its genre. An account of the energy market shenanigans engaged in by the now-defunct hedge fund Amaranth, the report is well-written, extensively documented, and makes a dramatically persuasive argument: A broken regulatory system allowed Amaranth the leeway to distort natural gas prices, and the system needs to be fixed. </p><p>There are two major exchanges where contracts to buy and sell natural gas futures are traded; the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) and the Intercontinental Exchange, (ICE). But there's a huge difference between the two. NYMEX is regulated, ICE isn't.<br /> <blockquote></p><p> ICE has no legal obligation to monitor trading, no legal obligation to prevent manipulation or price distortion, and no legal obligation to ensure that trading is fair and orderly. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/07/06/amaranth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/06/amaranth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drinking the invisible hand</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/04/water_dereg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/04/water_dereg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2007/04/04/water_dereg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The global water industry sees a profitable opportunity in drought and global warming.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't blame overpopulation or climate change or environmental degradation for global water shortages, says <a target="new" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9e60dd7a-e1fd-11db-af9e-000b5df10621.html">the Financial Times;</a> the real villains are government bureaucrats.<br /> <blockquote></p><p>"The question is how to overcome political resistance to the involvement of the private sector," [said David Lloyd Owen, a British consultant]. </p><p>"The water industry is one of the most conservative in the world. By and large, it is still run by bureaucrats and engineers," Mr Owen said. "There is also a passionate and well-organized lobby against privatization." </p><p>The thesis of the article is that an era of increasing drinking-water scarcity is a terrific business opportunity for companies that specialize in water treatment and desalination. Algeria, for example, is spending billions of dollars on desalination plants, "after suffering acute water shortages five years ago." Global warming, in this formulation, is just more good news for the private water sector. <i>If only governments would get out of the way and let them serve the people.</i> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/04/water_dereg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/04/water_dereg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Lay, lynching victim?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2006/07/13/lay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a memorial service for the Enron chairman, a local pastor equates Lay's prosection to the gruesome murder of an African-American man.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1998, three Texas men attacked a 49-year-old African-American named <a target= "new" href="http://www.cnn.com/US/9901/26/dragging.death.01/index.html">James Byrd.</a> They cut his throat, chained him to the back of a pickup truck, then dragged him along a road for several miles. Byrd was alive for at least part of the ordeal; a forensic pathologist said that Byrd lived until he hit a culvert and his arm and head were severed. His attackers dragged what was left of his body for at least an additional mile. </p><p>Gruesome? Yes, but it's apparently no worse than what happened to Ken Lay. </p><p>The former Enron chairman died of a heart attack at his vacation home in Aspen, Colo., last week. At a <a target= "new" href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/4043620.html">memorial service</a> in Houston Wednesday -- with former President George H.W. Bush in attendance -- a local pastor likened Lay's prosecution in Enron's collapse to the attack on Byrd. "Ken Lay was neither black nor poor, as James Byrd was," said the Rev. William Lawson, pastor emeritus of the Wheeler Avenue Baptist Church. "But I'm angry because Ken was the victim of a lynching." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
