<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Enron</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/enron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s Freudian tweet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal has never made any attempt to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704431804574539921864252380.html">hide</a> its <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574571662869948676.html">antipathy</a> for Sarbanes-Oxley, the Enron/Worldcom-inspired law that attempted to increase oversight on public company accounting. The Journal's position is that the law imposed costs on businesses that hurt the overall economy. Since this is the Journal's editorial position on <em>any</em> legislation that tries to rein in the business world, no one was ever required to take their rantings too seriously (even though, it is true, Sarbanes-Oxley has resulted in compliance costs that can be challenging for smaller public firms).</p><p>So perhaps that explains why the Wall Street Journal's <a href="http://twitter.com/WSJ">flagship Twitter feed</a> (as pointed out by <a href="http://twitter.com/felixsalmon/status/17261134045">Felix Salmon</a>) jumped the gun this morning, reporting via <a href="http://twitter.com/WSJ/statuses/17257780737">a tweet practically dripping with glee</a> that Sarbanes-Oxley had finally been vanquished!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/">http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/wall_street_journal_freudian_tweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Abramoff, Eliot Spitzer: A tale of two swindlers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casino Jack and the United States of Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What do the following have in common: Imprisoned Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff, disgraced ex-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, the collapse of Enron, the Bush administration's torture policies, the late gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson? Before we go chasing some thread of thematic continuity -- and we could definitely do that -- let's observe the emotional connection. All of those people and things provoke or embody big, visceral reactions: shock, outrage, disgust, amazement.</p><p>The other thing they have in common, of course, is <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">Alex Gibney,</a> who has made movies about all those subjects, including the Oscar-winner <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/04/30/tribeca_2">"Taxi to the Dark Side,"</a> the box-office breakthrough <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2005/04/21/enron/index.html">"Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room"</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/index.html">"Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson,"</a> which wasn't a big hit but strikes me as a key work in understanding what Gibney is up to. He thrives on those oversize emotions mentioned above, channeling them into intentionally ambiguous pop documentaries that inhabit a nuanced middle ground between journalism and entertainment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the following have in common: Imprisoned Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff, disgraced ex-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, the collapse of Enron, the Bush administration&#8217;s torture policies, the late gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson? Before we go chasing some thread of thematic continuity &#8212; and we could definitely do that &#8212; let&#8217;s observe the emotional connection. All of those people and things provoke or embody big, visceral reactions: shock, outrage, disgust, amazement.</p><p>The other thing they have in common, of course, is <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">Alex Gibney,</a> who has made movies about all those subjects, including the Oscar-winner <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/04/30/tribeca_2">&#8220;Taxi to the Dark Side,&#8221;</a> the box-office breakthrough <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2005/04/21/enron/index.html">&#8220;Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room&#8221;</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/index.html">&#8220;Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson,&#8221;</a> which wasn&#8217;t a big hit but strikes me as a key work in understanding what Gibney is up to. He thrives on those oversize emotions mentioned above, channeling them into intentionally ambiguous pop documentaries that inhabit a nuanced middle ground between journalism and entertainment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive Alex Gibney clip: Jack Abramoff and healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casino Jack and the United States of Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/04/30/gibney_clip</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In an exclusive premiere for Film Salon readers, here's a deleted scene from Oscar-winning director <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">Alex Gibney's</a> upcoming documentary <a href="http://www.takepart.com/casinojack">"Casino Jack and the United States of Money."</a> The film recounts the horrifying, mesmerizing saga of &#252;ber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the congressional corruption scandal of the late '90s and early 2000s that dramatically changed the landscape of Washington (and definitely not for the better).</p><p>In this Webisode, Gibney explores the elaborate money shuffle through which Abramoff channeled money from supposedly legitimate lobbying clients (like Indian tribes) through Republican PACs and Big Pharma front groups, who in turn wrote industry-friendly legislation that was passed intact by the GOP-led Congress. I'll have an interview with Gibney and more coverage of the film next week. "Casino Jack and the United States of Money" opens May 7 in major cities, but you'll only find this clip here (at least until the DVD comes out).</p><p>
    <object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9S_DigsLilU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9S_DigsLilU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an exclusive premiere for Film Salon readers, here&#8217;s a deleted scene from Oscar-winning director <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">Alex Gibney&#8217;s</a> upcoming documentary <a href="http://www.takepart.com/casinojack">&#8220;Casino Jack and the United States of Money.&#8221;</a> The film recounts the horrifying, mesmerizing saga of &#252;ber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the congressional corruption scandal of the late &#8217;90s and early 2000s that dramatically changed the landscape of Washington (and definitely not for the better).</p><p>In this Webisode, Gibney explores the elaborate money shuffle through which Abramoff channeled money from supposedly legitimate lobbying clients (like Indian tribes) through Republican PACs and Big Pharma front groups, who in turn wrote industry-friendly legislation that was passed intact by the GOP-led Congress. I&#8217;ll have an interview with Gibney and more coverage of the film next week. &#8220;Casino Jack and the United States of Money&#8221; opens May 7 in major cities, but you&#8217;ll only find this clip here (at least until the DVD comes out).</p><p>
    <object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9S_DigsLilU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9S_DigsLilU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time for Wall Street to pay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/wall_street_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/wall_street_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/03/17/wall_street</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Almost everybody's got their noses out of joint these days -- and no wonder. If there's a significant American institution that hasn't failed in its fundamental public responsibility over the past decade, it'd be hard to identify.</p><p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1971133_1971110_1971117,00.html">Writing in Time</a>, Christopher Hayes puts it succinctly: "Nearly every pillar institution in American society -- whether it's General Motors, Congress, Wall Street, Major League Baseball, the Catholic Church or the mainstream media -- has revealed itself to be corrupt, incompetent or both. And at the root of these failures are the people who run these institutions, the bright and industrious minds who occupy the commanding heights of our meritocratic order."</p><p>Me, I blame the combination of runaway baseball salaries, the "talented and gifted" movement in schools, and the tyranny of SAT scores. I'm only half-joking. Once free agency drove even an average third baseman's pay into the seven-figure range formerly reserved for tycoons who owned major industries or medium-size Midwestern states, practically everybody with SAT scores over 1,400 figured they deserved to earn as much as Aramis Ramirez.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/wall_street_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost everybody&#8217;s got their noses out of joint these days &#8212; and no wonder. If there&#8217;s a significant American institution that hasn&#8217;t failed in its fundamental public responsibility over the past decade, it&#8217;d be hard to identify.</p><p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1971133_1971110_1971117,00.html">Writing in Time</a>, Christopher Hayes puts it succinctly: &#8220;Nearly every pillar institution in American society &#8212; whether it&#8217;s General Motors, Congress, Wall Street, Major League Baseball, the Catholic Church or the mainstream media &#8212; has revealed itself to be corrupt, incompetent or both. And at the root of these failures are the people who run these institutions, the bright and industrious minds who occupy the commanding heights of our meritocratic order.&#8221;</p><p>Me, I blame the combination of runaway baseball salaries, the &#8220;talented and gifted&#8221; movement in schools, and the tyranny of SAT scores. I&#8217;m only half-joking. Once free agency drove even an average third baseman&#8217;s pay into the seven-figure range formerly reserved for tycoons who owned major industries or medium-size Midwestern states, practically everybody with SAT scores over 1,400 figured they deserved to earn as much as Aramis Ramirez.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/wall_street_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/wall_street_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sundance: Searing portrait of a top lobbyist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance Film Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/01/29/gibney_video</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>PARK CITY, Utah -- Alex Gibney's new documentary, "Casino Jack and the United States of Money," which premiered at Sundance this week, is much more than a shocking and highly entertaining movie about Jack Abramoff, the &#252;ber-lobbyist at the center of the biggest corruption scandal in congressional history. It's a portrait of a political system that has been poisoned down to the root by the pernicious influence of big money, by the buying and selling of connections and influence, and by a radical free-market ideology that has been systematically employed to undermine the principles of representative democracy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PARK CITY, Utah &#8212; Alex Gibney&#8217;s new documentary, &#8220;Casino Jack and the United States of Money,&#8221; which premiered at Sundance this week, is much more than a shocking and highly entertaining movie about Jack Abramoff, the &#252;ber-lobbyist at the center of the biggest corruption scandal in congressional history. It&#8217;s a portrait of a political system that has been poisoned down to the root by the pernicious influence of big money, by the buying and selling of connections and influence, and by a radical free-market ideology that has been systematically employed to undermine the principles of representative democracy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grayson apologizes for &#8220;K street whore&#8221; comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Grayson, D-Fla.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/10/27/grayson_apology</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., has a habit of being outspoken -- and that's putting it mildly. It's made him <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/feature/2009/10/02/grayson/">a star on the left</a> recently, but it's also led to two fairly high-profile apologies just this month.</p><p>A few weeks ago, Grayson apologized for likening the death of uninsured Americans to the Holocaust. On Tuesday, he apologized for a comment he made a month ago, during an interview the radical conspiracist and radio host Alex Jones. At the time, he had <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/10/27/grayson/index.html">called</a> Linda Robertson, an advisor to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke he'd had some differences with a "K Street whore."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/">http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Alan Grayson goes a comment too far</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Grayson, D-Fla.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steny Hoyer, D-Md.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/10/27/grayson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some elected officials -- <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bT01mC9xSA">you know the ones</a> -- live on controversy. It&#8217;s one thing, of course, when you&#8217;re taking brave stands and challenging conventional wisdom. It&#8217;s another when, like Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., you&#8217;re going on wack-job conspiracy theory talk shows to call a fellow public servant a &#8220;whore.&#8221;</p><p>It was about a month ago that Grayson gave an interview to "The Alex Jones Show," which is home to a wide array of old-school right-wing conspiracy theorizing -- think the Bilderberg Group, Wall Street and Barack Obama conspiring to bring about the New World Order. You get the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGFw3hY20lM">idea</a>.</p><p>In the Jones interview, Grayson opined that Fed advisor Linda Robertson, with whom he has had some sharp exchanges, is a &#8220;K Street whore.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/">http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/grayson_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs CEO: If only we&#8217;d listened to Enron</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd Blankfein, the chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs, performed <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/text-goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd/story.aspx?guid={C6F573D0-DD4D-4DD1-95C4-2F396177405E}&amp;dist=msr_5">a reasonable facsimile of self-flagellation</a> in a speech delivered Tuesday in Washington to the Council of Institutional Investors. I imagine the general reaction to his analysis of where Wall Street went wrong would be: How come a smart guy like you didn't figure this out <em>before</em> you broke the global economy? But one section resonated with me:</p><blockquote>
<p>Fourth, risk models failed to capture the risk inherent in off-balance sheet activities, such as Structured Investment Vehicles. It seems clear now that managers of companies with large off-balance sheet exposure didn't appreciate the full magnitude of the economic risks they were exposed to; equally worrying, their counterparties were unaware of the full extent of these vehicles and, therefore, could not accurately assess the risk of doing business. <em>Post Enron, that is quite amazing.</em></p>
</blockquote><p>Italics mine. I once wrote, <a href="http://archive.salon.com/tech/col/leon/2002/01/19/enron_money/index.html">way back in the day,</a> that "Who knows -- [Enron CEO Ken] Lay might even go down in history as the man who broke Wall Street!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/">http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/goldman_sachs_and_enron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The corporate financiers are wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2008/09/19/market</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that we're all about to take on hundreds of billions or perhaps a trillion dollars in new public debt to redeem the nation's super-smart corporate financiers, there is one thing I hope we can expect in addition to postponing the apocalypse. Will they all please shut up about the wonders of the unfettered free market and the horrors of big government? </p><p>For decades, the investment class and their mouthpieces in the conservative movement have been telling Americans that if only we repealed all those musty old New Deal rules and programs, then we could enjoy unprecedented prosperity. Repeated endlessly by the think tanks, magazines and academics of the right-wing machinery, this message eventually drowned out the reality-based ideas of the American liberal tradition. Although those were the ideas that had actually built this country over the past century, they were erased from public consciousness by a combination of amnesia and propaganda. </p><p>Amazingly, many and perhaps most Americans failed to perceive the deceptions in that propaganda, even after a series of horrific experiences with right-wing ideology run amok. We have been here before, after all -- or at least we have been somewhere that looked a lot like this, and not so long ago. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/">http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/19/market_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>156</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bedtime for &#8220;Gonzo&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="art r" style="width: 175px"> <img class='wp-image-10043269' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/07/story7.jpg' />
<p class="caption"><strong><a target="new" href="http://media.salon.com/media/mp3/2008/07/conversations_gibney.mp3">Listen to the interview</a></strong></p>
<p class="caption">Subscribe: <a target="new" href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=157190082">iTunes</a><br /> URL: </p>
<p><img class='wp-image-10043271' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/07/conversations_article1.gif' /></div>
<p>Gonzo journalism pioneer <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_S._Thompson">Hunter S. Thompson</a> and documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney don't seem like the most natural pairing, at least at first. Gibney's films, including the Oscar-winning <a href="/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">"Taxi to the Dark Side"</a> (which has produced an ugly dispute between Gibney and the film's distributor) and the Oscar-nominated <a href="/ent/movies/review/2005/04/21/enron/">"Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room,"</a> essentially present old-school investigative journalism, filtered through a pop sensibility. Gibney himself has compared his research-intensive work to archaeology, and I doubt anyone has ever described Thompson's work in those terms. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art r" style="width: 175px"> <img class='wp-image-10043269' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/07/story7.jpg' /></p><p class="caption"><strong><a target="new" href="http://media.salon.com/media/mp3/2008/07/conversations_gibney.mp3">Listen to the interview</a></strong></p><p class="caption">Subscribe: <a target="new" href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=157190082">iTunes</a><br /> URL: </p><p><img class='wp-image-10043271' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/07/conversations_article1.gif' /><p>Gonzo journalism pioneer <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_S._Thompson">Hunter S. Thompson</a> and documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney don&#8217;t seem like the most natural pairing, at least at first. Gibney&#8217;s films, including the Oscar-winning <a href="/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">&#8220;Taxi to the Dark Side&#8221;</a> (which has produced an ugly dispute between Gibney and the film&#8217;s distributor) and the Oscar-nominated <a href="/ent/movies/review/2005/04/21/enron/">&#8220;Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room,&#8221;</a> essentially present old-school investigative journalism, filtered through a pop sensibility. Gibney himself has compared his research-intensive work to archaeology, and I doubt anyone has ever described Thompson&#8217;s work in those terms. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.salon.com/media/mp3/2008/07/conversations_gibney.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bear-Stearns recalls the glory days of Enron</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When Enron CEO Ken Lay testified in his criminal fraud trail in 2006, he accused the Wall Street Journal of <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/26/business/Enron.php">bringing down his company.</a><br />
<blockquote></p><p>"We thought The Wall Street Journal was on a witch hunt of Andy Fastow," Lay testified Tuesday, referring to a series of articles the newspaper published about the partnerships beginning in October 2001. </p><p>"It was absolutely destroying the confidence investors had in the company and driving down the stock price," he added. </p><p>A time-honored ploy! Blame the media! Today, Bear-Stearns CEO Alan Schwarz attempted the same maneuver, <a href="http://www.muckraked.com/wordpress/2008/04/03/bear-stearns-ceo-blames-media-echo-of-rumors-and-speculation/">according to Muckraked,</a> which obtained a copy of his prepared testimony for a congressional hearing held Thursday.<br />
<blockquote></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Enron CEO Ken Lay testified in his criminal fraud trail in 2006, he accused the Wall Street Journal of <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/26/business/Enron.php">bringing down his company.</a></p><blockquote>
<p>&#8220;We thought The Wall Street Journal was on a witch hunt of Andy Fastow,&#8221; Lay testified Tuesday, referring to a series of articles the newspaper published about the partnerships beginning in October 2001. </p>
<p>&#8220;It was absolutely destroying the confidence investors had in the company and driving down the stock price,&#8221; he added. </p>
</blockquote><p>A time-honored ploy! Blame the media! Today, Bear-Stearns CEO Alan Schwarz attempted the same maneuver, <a href="http://www.muckraked.com/wordpress/2008/04/03/bear-stearns-ceo-blames-media-echo-of-rumors-and-speculation/">according to Muckraked,</a> which obtained a copy of his prepared testimony for a congressional hearing held Thursday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/bear_stearns_and_enron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s monumental fall from grace</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>"I acted in a way that violated my obligation to my family." </p>
<p>Eliot Spitzer, governor of New York</p>
</blockquote><p>As a reporter and editor who spent a good part of his career critically covering the excesses of the dot-com economy and the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/col/leon/2002/01/19/enron_money/">Enron era of runaway greed,</a> the emergence in the early 2000s of Eliot Spitzer as a crusading attorney general, clad in shining armor and pointing his lance directly at Wall Street's biggest fat cats, was an unexpected dream. While the politicians in Washington were betraying every trust, Spitzer had the effrontery to act as if he had a responsibility to prevent the powerful from profiting at the expense of the rest of us. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>&#8220;I acted in a way that violated my obligation to my family.&#8221; </p>
<p>Eliot Spitzer, governor of New York</p>
</blockquote><p>As a reporter and editor who spent a good part of his career critically covering the excesses of the dot-com economy and the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/col/leon/2002/01/19/enron_money/">Enron era of runaway greed,</a> the emergence in the early 2000s of Eliot Spitzer as a crusading attorney general, clad in shining armor and pointing his lance directly at Wall Street&#8217;s biggest fat cats, was an unexpected dream. While the politicians in Washington were betraying every trust, Spitzer had the effrontery to act as if he had a responsibility to prevent the powerful from profiting at the expense of the rest of us. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/10/spitzer_fall_from_grace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why did Gonzales resign?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//blumenthal/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When Alberto Gonzales swiftly turned heel on the stage at the Department of Justice without answering questions about his resignation as attorney general he left behind yet another lingering cloud of mystery. What is he not telling about his resignation? </p><p> The true story may be something like the denouement of Edgar Allan Poe's "The Purloined Letter," which was in plain sight all along, a solution that can, as Poe wrote, "escape observation by dint of being excessively obvious; and here the physical oversight is precisely analogous with the moral inapprehension by which the intellect suffers to pass unnoticed those considerations which are too obtrusively and too palpably self-evident." To be excessively obvious, Gonzales' resignation, following <a href=http://dir.salon.com/topics/karl_rove/>Karl Rove</a>'s exactly by two weeks, is the shadow of the first act. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Alberto Gonzales swiftly turned heel on the stage at the Department of Justice without answering questions about his resignation as attorney general he left behind yet another lingering cloud of mystery. What is he not telling about his resignation? </p><p> The true story may be something like the denouement of Edgar Allan Poe&#8217;s &#8220;The Purloined Letter,&#8221; which was in plain sight all along, a solution that can, as Poe wrote, &#8220;escape observation by dint of being excessively obvious; and here the physical oversight is precisely analogous with the moral inapprehension by which the intellect suffers to pass unnoticed those considerations which are too obtrusively and too palpably self-evident.&#8221; To be excessively obvious, Gonzales&#8217; resignation, following <a href=http://dir.salon.com/topics/karl_rove/>Karl Rove</a>&#8216;s exactly by two weeks, is the shadow of the first act. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/gonzales_resignation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The long arms of Enron reach beyond the grave</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/06/amaranth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/06/amaranth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2007/07/06/amaranth</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hsgac.senate.gov/_files/062507Report.pdf">"Excessive Speculation in the Natural Gas Market,"</a> a 139-page report released June 25 by the United States Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, is a masterpiece of its genre. An account of the energy market shenanigans engaged in by the now-defunct hedge fund Amaranth, the report is well-written, extensively documented, and makes a dramatically persuasive argument: A broken regulatory system allowed Amaranth the leeway to distort natural gas prices, and the system needs to be fixed. </p><p>There are two major exchanges where contracts to buy and sell natural gas futures are traded; the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) and the Intercontinental Exchange, (ICE). But there's a huge difference between the two. NYMEX is regulated, ICE isn't.<br />
<blockquote></p><p> ICE has no legal obligation to monitor trading, no legal obligation to prevent manipulation or price distortion, and no legal obligation to ensure that trading is fair and orderly. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/07/06/amaranth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hsgac.senate.gov/_files/062507Report.pdf">&#8220;Excessive Speculation in the Natural Gas Market,&#8221;</a> a 139-page report released June 25 by the United States Senate&#8217;s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, is a masterpiece of its genre. An account of the energy market shenanigans engaged in by the now-defunct hedge fund Amaranth, the report is well-written, extensively documented, and makes a dramatically persuasive argument: A broken regulatory system allowed Amaranth the leeway to distort natural gas prices, and the system needs to be fixed. </p><p>There are two major exchanges where contracts to buy and sell natural gas futures are traded; the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) and the Intercontinental Exchange, (ICE). But there&#8217;s a huge difference between the two. NYMEX is regulated, ICE isn&#8217;t.</p><blockquote>
<p> ICE has no legal obligation to monitor trading, no legal obligation to prevent manipulation or price distortion, and no legal obligation to ensure that trading is fair and orderly. </p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/07/06/amaranth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/06/amaranth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drinking the invisible hand</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/04/water_dereg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/04/water_dereg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2007/04/04/water_dereg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Don't blame overpopulation or climate change or environmental degradation for global water shortages, says <a target="new" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9e60dd7a-e1fd-11db-af9e-000b5df10621.html">the Financial Times;</a> the real villains are government bureaucrats.<br />
<blockquote></p><p>"The question is how to overcome political resistance to the involvement of the private sector," [said David Lloyd Owen, a British consultant]. </p><p>"The water industry is one of the most conservative in the world. By and large, it is still run by bureaucrats and engineers," Mr Owen said. "There is also a passionate and well-organized lobby against privatization." </p><p>The thesis of the article is that an era of increasing drinking-water scarcity is a terrific business opportunity for companies that specialize in water treatment and desalination. Algeria, for example, is spending billions of dollars on desalination plants, "after suffering acute water shortages five years ago." Global warming, in this formulation, is just more good news for the private water sector. <i>If only governments would get out of the way and let them serve the people.</i> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/04/water_dereg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t blame overpopulation or climate change or environmental degradation for global water shortages, says <a target="new" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9e60dd7a-e1fd-11db-af9e-000b5df10621.html">the Financial Times;</a> the real villains are government bureaucrats.</p><blockquote>
<p>&#8220;The question is how to overcome political resistance to the involvement of the private sector,&#8221; [said David Lloyd Owen, a British consultant]. </p>
<p>&#8220;The water industry is one of the most conservative in the world. By and large, it is still run by bureaucrats and engineers,&#8221; Mr Owen said. &#8220;There is also a passionate and well-organized lobby against privatization.&#8221; </p>
</blockquote><p>The thesis of the article is that an era of increasing drinking-water scarcity is a terrific business opportunity for companies that specialize in water treatment and desalination. Algeria, for example, is spending billions of dollars on desalination plants, &#8220;after suffering acute water shortages five years ago.&#8221; Global warming, in this formulation, is just more good news for the private water sector. <i>If only governments would get out of the way and let them serve the people.</i> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/04/water_dereg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/04/water_dereg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Lay, lynching victim?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2006/07/13/lay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1998, three Texas men attacked a 49-year-old African-American named <a target= "new" href="http://www.cnn.com/US/9901/26/dragging.death.01/index.html">James Byrd.</a> They cut his throat, chained him to the back of a pickup truck, then dragged him along a road for several miles. Byrd was alive for at least part of the ordeal; a forensic pathologist said that Byrd lived until he hit a culvert and his arm and head were severed. His attackers dragged what was left of his body for at least an additional mile. </p><p>Gruesome? Yes, but it's apparently no worse than what happened to Ken Lay. </p><p>The former Enron chairman died of a heart attack at his vacation home in Aspen, Colo., last week. At a <a target= "new" href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/4043620.html">memorial service</a> in Houston Wednesday -- with former President George H.W. Bush in attendance -- a local pastor likened Lay's prosecution in Enron's collapse to the attack on Byrd. "Ken Lay was neither black nor poor, as James Byrd was," said the Rev. William Lawson, pastor emeritus of the Wheeler Avenue Baptist Church. "But I'm angry because Ken was the victim of a lynching." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/">http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/13/lay_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kenneth Lay: Not the first to cheat the Big House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/06/lay_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/06/lay_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/07/06/lay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Those sympathetic to Ken Lay might think his sudden death of a heart attack on Wednesday morning has saved him from a miserable existence. The architect of the biggest corporate fraud in U.S. history died four months before his sentencing on 10 counts of corruption. With a sentence nearly certain to top 25 years, the 64-year-old Kenny Boy was destined to die behind bars. </p><p> Those less favorably disposed, like perhaps some of the 5,600 Enron employees who lost their jobs and $2.1 billion in retirement savings, may feel they were cheated of justice, and wonder if Kenny Boy somehow willed himself to dodge the embrace of federal prison. There is no suggestion of suicide, and results of an autopsy should be available later this week. But just how common is it for defendants like Lay to exit the scene with such good timing? </p><p> There are statistics on how many prisoners die in prison, but none on how many defendants die before they get there. "It's nobody's job to count them," says Marc Mauer, executive director of <a href="http://www.sentencingproject.org/">the Sentencing Project.</a> "I'd be shocked if anybody kept those records." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/06/lay_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those sympathetic to Ken Lay might think his sudden death of a heart attack on Wednesday morning has saved him from a miserable existence. The architect of the biggest corporate fraud in U.S. history died four months before his sentencing on 10 counts of corruption. With a sentence nearly certain to top 25 years, the 64-year-old Kenny Boy was destined to die behind bars. </p><p> Those less favorably disposed, like perhaps some of the 5,600 Enron employees who lost their jobs and $2.1 billion in retirement savings, may feel they were cheated of justice, and wonder if Kenny Boy somehow willed himself to dodge the embrace of federal prison. There is no suggestion of suicide, and results of an autopsy should be available later this week. But just how common is it for defendants like Lay to exit the scene with such good timing? </p><p> There are statistics on how many prisoners die in prison, but none on how many defendants die before they get there. &#8220;It&#8217;s nobody&#8217;s job to count them,&#8221; says Marc Mauer, executive director of <a href="http://www.sentencingproject.org/">the Sentencing Project.</a> &#8220;I&#8217;d be shocked if anybody kept those records.&#8221; </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/06/lay_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/06/lay_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enron changed nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/31/enron_27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/31/enron_27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2006/05/31/enron</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Enron's managerial miscreants Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling are facing a lifetime in prison, and the press is gleefully reporting every last detail. After all, this was a bracing confirmation of not just the glories of the American criminal justice system but also, implicitly, the idea that this time things are Really Going to Be Different in Corporate America. Henceforth, corporations will be caught and punished with the certainty that one would have expected at the end of an old "Dragnet" episode. More prosecutions are coming, count on that. As Gretchen Morgenson put it in the New York Times on Sunday, the Lay-Skilling convictions were, "at best, the end of the beginning of this dispiriting corporate crime wave." </p><p>All this is true, I suppose, if what we have is indeed a 1950s-style "crime wave," its parameters defined as a grim statistical count of arrests, convictions and sentencings. But that's not what we have at all. Like the pipe-puffing Freudian liberals of that era, I prefer to examine the root causes, the home environment, in which regulatory agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission function in the manner of an indulgent, all-too-forgiving Montessori school headmaster. Corporate delinquents, having failed to respond to counseling, are turned over to the blue-uniformed constabulary of the Justice Department only when they become too obstreperous to control. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/31/enron_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enron&#8217;s managerial miscreants Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling are facing a lifetime in prison, and the press is gleefully reporting every last detail. After all, this was a bracing confirmation of not just the glories of the American criminal justice system but also, implicitly, the idea that this time things are Really Going to Be Different in Corporate America. Henceforth, corporations will be caught and punished with the certainty that one would have expected at the end of an old &#8220;Dragnet&#8221; episode. More prosecutions are coming, count on that. As Gretchen Morgenson put it in the New York Times on Sunday, the Lay-Skilling convictions were, &#8220;at best, the end of the beginning of this dispiriting corporate crime wave.&#8221; </p><p>All this is true, I suppose, if what we have is indeed a 1950s-style &#8220;crime wave,&#8221; its parameters defined as a grim statistical count of arrests, convictions and sentencings. But that&#8217;s not what we have at all. Like the pipe-puffing Freudian liberals of that era, I prefer to examine the root causes, the home environment, in which regulatory agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission function in the manner of an indulgent, all-too-forgiving Montessori school headmaster. Corporate delinquents, having failed to respond to counseling, are turned over to the blue-uniformed constabulary of the Justice Department only when they become too obstreperous to control. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/31/enron_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/31/enron_27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who gets blamed for Enron?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/enron_clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/enron_clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2006/05/26/enron_clinton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday's gleeful dancing on the grave of Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling elicited an unusually large number of anonymous posts from readers eager to pin the blame for Enron on the Clinton administration --"all that bad stuff happened on his watch, so it's his fault!" </p><p>How the World Works welcomes readers of all political stripes, though we prefer it if they attach real names, or at least persistent identities, to their arguments. We generally aren't predisposed to take an argument seriously if it's signed "No Name Given." </p><p>Then again, the argument that Enron was Clinton's scandal and not Bush's is so absurd that one can understand why no one would put an actual name behind it. Let's review some history, shall we? </p><p>Ken Lay was George Bush's number one financial backer. During the 2000 election campaign, Bush frequently flew on Enron corporate jets. Bush's first cabinet included a former Enron executive, Thomas White, as Army Secretary, and two former Enron advisers, Lawrence Lindsey (Bush's first chief economic adviser) and Robert Zoellick (Bush's first United States Trade Representative). </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/enron_clinton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/enron_clinton/">http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/enron_clinton/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/enron_clinton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/26/enron_clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lay and Skilling: Guilty, guilty, guilty!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/25/guilty_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/25/guilty_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2006/05/25/guilty</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The people have spoken. Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling are guilty, guilty, guilty. You name it: conspiracy, wire fraud, securities fraud. Lay was convicted on <i>all counts.</i> Skilling was convicted on 18 counts of conspiracy and fraud. </p><p>Let's hope that chief executives everywhere feel uneasy on their thrones. Because the ramifications of this verdict are profound. More than any other corporation, Enron symbolized a culture of greed and arrogance that made mockery of the values of a civilized society. From its "rank-and-yank" treatment of workers to its scorn for government regulation to its elevation of the scruple-free, gunslinging trader into highflying culture hero, Enron declared with every step: We know best; we are the state of the art of modern capitalism. Follow us to the future, or suck on our exhaust. </p><p>And at its height, the company was <i>lauded</i> for its balls-out braggadocio. The business press fawned over it: Fortune magazine named it "most innovative corporation" in America <i>six years in a row.</i> Lay hobnobbed with presidents and was considered on the shortlist for energy secretary. Skilling was the Harvard-educated, McKinsey-trained "genius" who created brand-new markets with the wave of a hand. Enron was endlessly innovative, endlessly creative, endlessly profitable. Enron was what all companies aspired to be, if only those darned governments would get out of the way and let them run free. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/25/guilty_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/25/guilty_3/">http://www.salon.com/2006/05/25/guilty_3/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/25/guilty_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/25/guilty_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

