<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:31:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>4 reasons why Obama should push for a carbon tax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even a minor tax would create jobs and federal revenue, not to mention help the environment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> We are at an unacknowledged turning point for the economy and the environment. We could, right now, substantially reduce our debt and deficit projections, take a major step toward a better environment, create a simpler and fairer tax system, make job creation easier, and raise economic growth a bit. For all of these reasons, we could and should adopt a carbon tax.</p><p>Taking this step depends on two men: President Obama and Senator Max Baucus, chair of the Senate Finance Committee. Both men want to leave an important legacy, and both are in a unique political position: they still possess real political power, but neither will ever face another election. (Obama, of course, is limited to two terms, and Baucus has just announced that he will retire.) Acting together, the two of them could completely change the odds of enacting a carbon tax this year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cicadas prepare to invade by the billions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/cicadas_prepare_to_invade_by_the_billions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/cicadas_prepare_to_invade_by_the_billions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cicada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cicadas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17 year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But climate change may mean it's the last time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cicadas have black bodies, blood-red eyes and legs, delicately veined gossamer wings and oddly ridged faces that resemble the Klingons from “Star Trek.” Entomologist Cole Gilbert finds them “amazing.” And after listening to him discourse about the species over lunch late last month, I think I understand why. Cicadas (<em>Magicicada septendecim</em>)-- like many of the species Gilbert studies-- are just plain weird.</p><p>The Pilgrims called cicadas “17 year locusts,” because some of them survive for that long underground, sucking the sap from roots, between periodic emergences in epic swarms. Locusts are in the grasshopper family, however and cicadas are garish relatives of spittle bugs and crickets. Beyond that we know precious little about cicadas' mysterious lives under the earth. And we don’t understand why they wait 17 years between appearances (for some subgroups it’s 13 years, and there are also annuals.) Why 17? Why 13? We also don’t have a clue how these brainless arthropods manage to keep track of the passing years. And how exactly do cicada nymphs know when to all come wiggling out of the soil on cue, emerging within hours of one another after spending over a decade interred?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/cicadas_prepare_to_invade_by_the_billions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/cicadas_prepare_to_invade_by_the_billions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELF activist rearrested for writing blog post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/elf_activist_rearrested_for_writing_blog_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/elf_activist_rearrested_for_writing_blog_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel mcgowan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Liberation Front]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel McGowan, recently released into a halfway house, is back in federal detention reportedly over HuffPo column]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel McGowan, an environmental activist who spent seven years in federal prison after pleading guilty to arson charges relating to Earth Liberation Front actions, has been jailed again. McGowan was released into a halfway house earlier this year, but was returned Thursday to a federal detention center in Manhattan, reportedly because of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-mcgowan/communication-management-units_b_2944580.html">a column he wrote last week on HuffPo</a>, in which he decried his treatment in prison.</p><p>McGowan wrote about how between 2008 and 2010 he served time in the Communication Management Unit (CMU) at the U.S. Penitentiary in Marion, Ill. The unit, dubbed "Little Guantanamo," sees prisoners isolated from other inmates and severely restricted in their contact with their families and the outside world. In his column, McGowan charged that he was put in the CMU because of his political beliefs -- a court document revealed that he was apparently transferred in part because of his communications with the outside world, writing to contacts in radical and environmentalist communities.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/elf_activist_rearrested_for_writing_blog_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/elf_activist_rearrested_for_writing_blog_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Billionaire pledges to &#8220;destroy&#8221; climate skeptics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom steyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obscenely wealthy retired hedge fund manager will use strength of money in politics to environmental ends]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California billionaire Tom Steyer is setting himself up as a sort of anti-Koch. The retired hedge fund manager told the Hill that he will dedicate a fortune to fighting climate change through political donations -- "he wants to make climate change a campaign issue for years to come and Democratic support for environmental protections as widespread as support for gay marriage and immigration reform," noted the Hill.</p><p>Of course, activists concerned with campaign finance reform and the undue influence of money in politics will not welcome Steyer's pledge. Others might be pleased that the Koch support for climate skeptical policy will have a match. In the parlance appropriate to an aggressive financier, the green capitalist told the Hill that he planned to "destroy" climate skeptics and sought a "smashing victory." Via<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/291559-greens-get-billionaire-ally-money#ixzz2PQG9bYzy"> the Hill:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New spill reveals how horrible Keystone could be</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/new_spill_reveals_how_horrible_keystone_could_be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/new_spill_reveals_how_horrible_keystone_could_be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TransCanada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unsure what to think of Keystone pipeline? Check out this video of a shorter pipeline leaking oil all over a street]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Keystone XL pipeline was already a bad idea three days ago. It is a <em>terrible</em> idea today.</p><p>This weekend, the Orwellian-named Exxon Pegasus pipeline <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/31/exxon-pipeline-spill-idUSL2N0CN00D20130331" target="_blank">spilled thousands of barrels of oil</a> into a residential neighborhood in Mayflower, Ark. Twenty-two families were evacuated from their homes, and cleanup, days later, continues. Check out this appalling video of crude oil leaking into the streets of this everyday American community:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/u30m8U6VP3E" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p>The oil is the same heavy crude from tar sands that oil companies behind the Keystone XL pipeline want to extract. In fact, the only difference between the Pegasus pipeline that leaked and the proposed Keystone XL? The proposed Keystone XL is <em><a href="http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html" target="_blank">longer</a></em> --- over <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/31/arkansas-oil-spill-2013-exxon_n_2986754.html" target="_blank">300 miles longer</a> than the pipeline that leaked in Arkansas on Friday. That means the Keystone XL pipeline is even more likely to leak. Not exactly a comforting prospect.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/new_spill_reveals_how_horrible_keystone_could_be/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/new_spill_reveals_how_horrible_keystone_could_be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State&#8217;s Keystone report authors also OK&#8217;d explosive Caspian pipeline</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/states_keystone_report_authors_also_okayed_explosive_caspian_pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/states_keystone_report_authors_also_okayed_explosive_caspian_pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Resources Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pipeline previously greenlighted by contractors failed to provide jobs, caused severe environmental damage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/">noted earlier this month</a>, following the release of the State Department’s Environmental Impact Statement, which<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/"> greenlighted </a>the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline, it emerged that the report’s authors were outside contractors with oil industry ties. The contractor that produced the bulk of the report was Environmental Resources Management, DeSmog Blog reported, which had ties to tar sands extraction companies. On Tuesday, DeSmog Blog's Steve Horn added yet another layer of discreditation to the Environmental Impact Statement -- namely that ERM has a terrible track record when it comes to greenlighting pipeline projects.</p><p>ERM also authored a report that argued that the 2002 BP Caspian pipeline was environmentally and economically sound --  as the firm has also determined with the Keystone XL project. Horn notes that the predictions about the Caspian pipeline were dramatically wrong -- the project failed to deliver on jobs and the pipeline has been the site of explosions and oil spills. Via <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2013/03/26/state-department-keystone-xl-contractor-erm-approved-explosive-bp-caspian-pipeline">DeSmog Blog:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/states_keystone_report_authors_also_okayed_explosive_caspian_pipeline/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/states_keystone_report_authors_also_okayed_explosive_caspian_pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Keystone XL pipeline a jobs creator?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/the_keystone_xl_pipeline_who_would_it_help_and_hurt_the_most_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/the_keystone_xl_pipeline_who_would_it_help_and_hurt_the_most_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New America Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State Department says it could offer employment to as many as 40,000. That number may be wishful thinking]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.colorlines.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://arc.org/images/stories/logos_pr_kit/colorlines_logo_screen_rez.gif" alt="Colorlines.com" width="150" /></a> If you’ve been following the controversy over the Keystone XL oil pipeline, recent events will either encourage you, disappoint you, or both.</p><p>For a market that’s yet to be determined, this much ballyhooed project would transport hundreds of thousands of barrels of oil daily from Canadian tar sands compounds to the U.S. Gulf Coast for refining. What we do know is that the pipeline would dramatically increase the volume of climate change-causing greenhouse gas emissions, erasing what little progress North America has made in reducing its carbon footprint.</p><p>The State Department — which has final say in whether Keystone XL gets built — recently admitted as much in a highly publicized <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/">(and heavily criticized)</a> preliminary draft of its environmental impact study. State acknowledged the climate-change risks but then argued that rejecting the project wouldn’t reduce the amount of emissions flowing into our atmosphere because Canada would still burn the tar sands and pipeline the oil elsewhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/the_keystone_xl_pipeline_who_would_it_help_and_hurt_the_most_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/the_keystone_xl_pipeline_who_would_it_help_and_hurt_the_most_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP edited its own environmental record on Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bp_edited_its_own_environmental_record_on_wikipedia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bp_edited_its_own_environmental_record_on_wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepwater Horizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia editors accuse the oil giant of editing 44 percent of page about itself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated, 2:27 p.m.:</strong> Comments from BP in response to the accusation have been included below.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Wikipedia editors have accused BP of editing its own page entry to whitewash its environmental impact in the public record. As <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57575460-93/bp-accused-of-rewriting-environmental-record-on-wikipedia/">CNET</a> reported Thursday, "angry Wikipedia editors estimate that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:BP#BP.27s_drafts_as_unpublished_primary_sources">BP has rewritten 44 percent of the page about itself</a>, especially about its environmental performance." Via CNET:</p><blockquote><p>BP is not directly editing its page, but instead has apparently inserted a BP representative into the editing community who provides Wikipedia editors with text.</p> <p>The text is then copied "as is" onto the page by Wikipedia editors, while readers are none the wiser that the sections pretending to be unbiased information are, in fact, vetted by higher-ups at BP before hitting the page.</p> <p>... BP's image cleanup cleverly skirts Wikipedia's editorial rules, wherein Wikipedia editors are using text that BP posts on Wikipedia itself as the source (although the text is not published on BP's Web site).</p> <p>This way, the significant involvement of BP in its own entry is completely hidden from Wikipedia readers -- while Wikipedia editors, as usual, argue and attack each other over editorial policy while BP's favorable PR editing continues.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bp_edited_its_own_environmental_record_on_wikipedia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bp_edited_its_own_environmental_record_on_wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Department hid oil industry ties in Keystone XL report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/state_dept_hid_oil_industry_ties_in_keystone_xl_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/state_dept_hid_oil_industry_ties_in_keystone_xl_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tarsands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The contractors who authored the report had oil industry ties -- this information was redacted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/">noted earlier this month</a>, following the release of the State Department's Environmental Impact Statement, which<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/"> greenlighted </a>the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline, it emerged that the report's authors were outside contractors with oil industry ties. “Unmentioned by State: the study was contracted out to firms with tar sands extraction clientele," DeSmog Blog's Steve Horn wrote.</p><p>On Thursday <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/keystone-xl-contractor-ties-transcanada-state-department">Mother Jones reported </a>that the State Department not only didn't mention these connections, but took pains to hide them:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/state_dept_hid_oil_industry_ties_in_keystone_xl_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/state_dept_hid_oil_industry_ties_in_keystone_xl_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The nuclear waste in that tuna roll</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/why_arent_we_more_worried_about_nuclear_sushi_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/why_arent_we_more_worried_about_nuclear_sushi_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnEarth.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sushi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Fukushima, small quantities of radiation have been found in bluefin tuna. How worried should we really be?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you’re like me, you prefer your sushi slathered with just enough spicy wasabi to inflict a painfully pleasurable jolt of heat. But even if you’re not a fan of the bright green, searingly hot sushi-bar condiment, I’m guessing you’d still probably opt for it over a far less appetizing source of heat: radiation. Specifically, radioactive metals that were deposited into the sea near the coastal city of Fukushima, Japan, after the nuclear accident that took place there <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster" target="_blank">two years ago this week</a>.<br /> <a href="http://www.onearth.org/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/02/OElogo_500x55-e1360801074770.png" alt="OnEarth" align="left" /></a></p><p>In two separate instances in 2011 and 2012, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-fukushima-radiation-20130225,0,1220090,full.story" target="_blank">quantities of ionizing radiation</a> were found in samples of bluefin tuna that had migrated from waters near the site of the Fukushima disaster, where the large fish spawn, to the southern California coastline, where they were eventually caught. In the first of these instances, Daniel Madigan, a marine biology graduate student at Stanford, bought 15 tuna steaks from dockside fishermen in San Diego and sent them off to a lab for testing. Madigan knew the migration patterns of the bluefin; at the time, which was less than six months after the accident, he was acting on little more than a hunch.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/why_arent_we_more_worried_about_nuclear_sushi_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/why_arent_we_more_worried_about_nuclear_sushi_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we build a sustainable Japan?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/can_we_build_a_sustainable_japan_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/can_we_build_a_sustainable_japan_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Island Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster capitalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Post-Fukushima, disaster capitalism is disrupting the region's recovery. Eco-friendliness could offer the solution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to Japan’s sustainable reconstruction?</p><p>I asked myself that question as I stood on a beach in Sendai in northeastern Japan’s Miyagi Prefecture two weeks ago.</p><p>I had arrived in Miyagi via Fukushima, the prefecture just to the south. In Fukushima I talked to people living through the most intensely-scrutinized environmental disaster in Japan’s history: the triple meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant that followed the tsunami and earthquake of March 11, 2011. <a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2013/03/10/people/two-years-on-fukushima-evacuees-seek-justice-and-a-normal-life/#.UT0aFxyVZDQ">Over 150,000 people are still living as evacuees</a>, often in tiny temporary houses and subsidized apartments, as efforts at decontamination moves slowly forward. Many told me they didn’t ever want to return home, no matter how safe the government promised they would be.</p><p>I was hoping to find a more positive story in Miyagi.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/can_we_build_a_sustainable_japan_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/can_we_build_a_sustainable_japan_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Department report OK&#8217;ing Keystone XL linked to oil industry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consulting firms with ties to oil giants provided the basis of government document]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State Department study published last month OK'ing the Keystone XL pipeline was partly compiled by "oil-industry connected" firms, according to new reports.</p><p>The Environmental Impact Statement,<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/"> as Salon noted</a> on its release, angered environmentalists for its assessment that the project was sound and would have limited negative consequences. As  <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2013/03/11/state-department-keystone-xl-study-oil-industry-big-tobacco-fracking">DeSmog Blog's Steve Horn noted </a>Tuesday, however, "Unmentioned by State: the study was contracted out to firms with tar sands extraction clientele, as revealed by InsideClimate News."</p><p>InsideClimate News reported that two firms, EnSys Energy and ICF International provided the State Department that basis for their claims:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Toms River cracked a cancer cluster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_toms_river_cracked_a_cancer_cluster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_toms_river_cracked_a_cancer_cluster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toms River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chemical companies treated this N.J. town as a private dumping ground for decades. Here's how they were made to pay]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the spring of 1995, when Steve Jones called to ask him to look into a possible cluster of childhood cancer in Toms River, Michael Berry had been New Jersey’s chief cluster investigator for almost nine years. It was still just a part-time responsibility — Berry spent most of his time on other tasks at the state health department — but it was now the least enjoyable part of his job. One of the first “incidence analyses” Berry ever attempted was the 1986 study of childhood cancer in Toms River. Its ambiguous results turned out to be a harbinger of dozens of similarly unsatisfying cluster studies he undertook around the state—including another one about Toms River kids in 1991. “After a while, it got frustrating,” he recalled many years later. “I mean, what were we accomplishing?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_toms_river_cracked_a_cancer_cluster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_toms_river_cracked_a_cancer_cluster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuomo on verge of approving fracking when RFK Jr. intervened</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/when_cuomo_was_to_approve_fracking_rfk_intervened/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/when_cuomo_was_to_approve_fracking_rfk_intervened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discussions with the environmentalist Kennedy were pivotal in delaying the New York governor's decision]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo came as close as he ever has to approving fracking last month, laying out a limited drilling plan for as many as 40 gas wells before changing course to await the findings of a new study after discussions with environmentalist and former brother-in-law Robert F. Kennedy Jr., several people familiar with his thinking told The Associated Press.</p><p>The turning point, which could delay a decision for up to a year or longer, came in a series of phone calls with Kennedy. The two discussed a new health study on the hydraulic fracturing drilling method that could be thorough enough to trump all others in a debate that has split New York for five years.</p><p>"I think the issue suddenly got simple for him," Kennedy told the AP, then went on to paraphrase Cuomo in their discussions: "'If it's causing health problems, I really don't want it in New York state. And if it's not causing health problems, we should figure out a way we can do it.'"</p><p>Kennedy and two other people close to Cuomo, who spoke to the AP only on condition of anonymity because Cuomo is carefully guarding his discussions on the issue, confirmed the outlines of the plan the governor was considering to allow 10 to 40 test wells in economically depressed southern New York towns that want drilling and the jobs it promises. The plan would allow the wells to operate under intense monitoring by the state to see if fracking should continue or expand.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/when_cuomo_was_to_approve_fracking_rfk_intervened/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/when_cuomo_was_to_approve_fracking_rfk_intervened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read our salon on fracking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two experts pulled apart the issue -- and each other’s arguments -- in real time. Read the debate here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The growing tension between environmental concerns and business interests intensified this weekend amid <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ap-ny-fracking-held-cuomo-rfk-jr-talk-18636918">reports</a> that New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo was ready to approve a plan to allow hydraulic fracturing (aka "hydrofracking" or "fracking") in parts of his state, until a last-minute intervention from Robert Kennedy Jr. put the plan on delay as it undergoes further study. As politicians at all levels (including <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/feb/16/fracking-obama-climate-change-goals">the president</a>) will be deciding whether to embrace the controversial method of shale gas drilling in coming months, we asked two experts with divergent views to discuss the issue with us -- and you.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change is our most difficult issue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/climate_change_is_our_most_difficult_issue_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/climate_change_is_our_most_difficult_issue_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why doesn't anybody seem to care?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Sundays ago, I traveled to the nation’s capital to attend what was billed as “the largest climate rally in history” and I haven’t been able to get the experience -- or a question that haunted me -- out of my mind. Where was everybody?</p><p>First, though, the obvious weather irony: climate change didn’t exactly come out in support of that rally. In the midst of the warmest years and some of the warmest winters on record, the demonstration, which focused on stopping the Keystone XL Pipeline -- it will bring tar-sands oil, some of the “dirtiest,” carbon-richest energy available from Alberta, Canada, to the U.S. Gulf Coast -- was the coldest I’ve ever attended. I thought I’d lose a few fingers and toes while listening to the hour-plus of speakers, including Senator Sheldon Whitehouse from Rhode Island, who were theoretically warming the crowd up for its march around the (other) White House.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/climate_change_is_our_most_difficult_issue_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/climate_change_is_our_most_difficult_issue_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Dept. says no environmental bar to Keystone XL</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmentalists are already criticizing the report, which supports the pipeline extension]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the chagrin of environmentalists opposed to the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, a State Department report released Friday afternoon stated there is no conclusive environmental reason it should not be built.</p><p>The report makes no recommendations for the president's anticipated decision on whether or not to approve the project, which will carry crude oil from Alberta’s tar sands to the Gulf Coast, while -- according to opponents -- producing high levels of carbon emissions, disturbing communities and adding to the coffers of oil magnates such as the Koch brothers. Friday's lengthy report suggests environmental objections have been overestimated by the project's critics. Via the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/02/us/us-report-sees-no-environmental-bar-to-keystone-pipeline.html?_r=0">New York Times:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trial begins for BP over Gulf oil spill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/trial_begins_for_bp_over_gulf_oil_spill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/trial_begins_for_bp_over_gulf_oil_spill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepwater Horizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BP's bill, decided by the court, could be as low as $5 billion or as high as $17.5 billion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After BP this weekend rejected a government offer to pay $16 billion to settle civil claims over the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster, Monday saw the beginning of trial proceedings against the oil giant.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/feb/24/bp-justice-deal-deepwater-horizon">the Guardian</a>, "the trial is expected to be one of the biggest in decades. It will open with 400 minutes of opening arguments from 11 teams of lawyers. Thousands of pages of exhibits have been filed, and 80 witnesses will be called. Tony Hayward, BP's former chief executive, will appear in a videotaped deposition." Following this, if a settlement is not reached in advance, federal Judge Carl Barbier will determine how much BP and its partners should pay for their role in the Gulf oil spill.</p><p>Via <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/billions-of-dollars-are-at-stake-for-bp-as-trial-opens-for-gulf-oil-spill-litigation/2013/02/25/cfadad44-7f2d-11e2-a671-0307392de8de_story_1.html">the AP:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/trial_begins_for_bp_over_gulf_oil_spill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/trial_begins_for_bp_over_gulf_oil_spill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the Chicago River be saved?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/cry_us_a_river_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/cry_us_a_river_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnEarth Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13209061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the people of Chicago save the waterway that made their city great?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The desolate stretch of territory alongside the South Branch of the Chicago River is littered with the shed husks of the city’s industrial past. Along overgrown banks, the rusting ribs of derelict warehouses poke out beneath crumbling storage silos. Just before South Ashland Avenue cuts across the river, there is a small spit of land where the South Branch splits -- a couple of acres at most. Canal Origins Park is choked with weeds and windblown trash. Its concrete path leading to the river is lined with historical signs, now sun-bleached and obscured by a palimpsest of graffiti tags. A line of electrical pylons marches along the riverbank toward the hazy skyline of downtown, four miles distant.</p><p>Locals gather at a railing, fishing in the brown water. One angler, a retired limo driver originally from Michoacán, Mexico, chomps a cigar beneath his handlebar mustache and surveys the scene. I ask him if he ever eats fish from the river, and he just laughs. He’s a regular here, he tells me, but returned to the spot only a few days ago after having stayed away for weeks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/cry_us_a_river_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/cry_us_a_river_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suzy Amis Cameron &#8220;greens&#8221; the red carpet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/23/suzy_amis_cameron_greens_the_red_carpet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/23/suzy_amis_cameron_greens_the_red_carpet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suzy amis cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13209360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the not-so-peaceful origins of "peace silk" and the improbable story of eco-haute couture  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most celebrities want to make a statement on the red carpet, but Suzy Amis Cameron wants to make a <em>statement </em>statement. About green design and long-term sustainability, specifically. But the Academy Awards, a night of $20,000 gowns and mega-bling, don't exactly scream eco-fashion. That could change, says Cameron.</p><p>Enter: Red Carpet, Green Dress.</p><p>As the wife of director James Cameron, Suzy had attended her fair share of Hollywood events, and wanted to see her values as an environmentalist reflected in what she wore on the red carpet. But while organic cotton T-shirts might be on the racks at H&amp;M (<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/25/world/asia/bangladesh-factory-fire" target="_blank">unethically produced</a> as they may be), natural dyes and sustainable fibers aren't exactly de rigueur in high fashion.</p><p>Which is precisely the problem that Cameron ran up against with the "Red Carpet, Green Dress" <a href="http://redcarpetgreendress.com/home/" target="_blank">design contest</a> she started to raise money for <a href="http://www.museschool.org/" target="_blank">MUSE school</a>, which she founded with sister Rebecca Amis in 2006. "Deborah Lynn Scott was our mentor designer that year, and she came to me and told me she couldn't find [eco-friendly] fabric. Now, for me, I just assumed it was going to be an easy thing: They would make a dress and I would wear it. But it opened up a whole other world of what really happens in the fashion industry," Cameron said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/23/suzy_amis_cameron_greens_the_red_carpet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/23/suzy_amis_cameron_greens_the_red_carpet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>