<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 23:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama slowly winning over Bill McKibben?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/is_obama_slowly_winning_over_bill_mckibben/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/is_obama_slowly_winning_over_bill_mckibben/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill McKibben]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's standard for approving Keystone pipeline is "a good one," the leading environmentalist tells Salon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">Following President Obama’s much-anticipated climate address Tuesday, many advocates were abuzz with praise for the president's speech. “The best address on climate by any president ever,” former Vice President Al Gore <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/307695-gore-obama-climate-change-speech-the-best-by-any-president-ever">gushed</a> of the speech, which outlined, among other things, the President’s plan to order the EPA to limit carbon emissions from new and existing power plants. “The most aggressive and promising climate plan to come out of the executive branch in years,” climatologist Michael Mann assented in a <a href="https://www.facebook.com/MichaelMannScientist/posts/545737035482503">statement</a> on Facebook.</p><p dir="ltr">In the midst of all the accolades, one wondered what Bill McKibben, one of the nation’s leading environmentalists (and Obama critics on the environment), would have to say about it. The head of the advocacy organization, 350.org, McKibben has sharply criticized what he has referred to as President Obama’s <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-11-09/opinions/35505607_1_climate-change-northern-gateway-pipeline-tar-sands">“waffling and contradictory”</a> climate policy, particularly his refusal to take a stand on the Keystone pipeline, which would carry oil from the tar sands of Alberta 1,200 miles to the Gulf of Mexico. Yet for McKibben, the speech on Tuesday seems to have represented a turning point in the President’s stance on climate change. “I thought he was straightforward, forthright, and clear,” McKibben told Salon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/is_obama_slowly_winning_over_bill_mckibben/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/is_obama_slowly_winning_over_bill_mckibben/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millennials save the world: Smartphones to the rescue!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/millennials_save_the_world_smartphones_to_the_rescue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/millennials_save_the_world_smartphones_to_the_rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airbnb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getaround]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RelayRides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartphones and the sharing economy help Americans drive less -- and an oft-derided generation is leading the way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are driving less. Ever since the summer of 2005, right up until March 2013, the last month <a href="http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/DOT-Miles-Driven.php">for which statistics are available,</a> the average number of miles driven by Americans has fallen steadily. What once could easily be explained away by pointing to the double whammy of a recession and high gas prices now appears to be <a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Did-America-Reach-Peak-Car-in-2005?utm_source=Daily&amp;utm_medium=Headline&amp;utm_campaign=GTMDaily">structural.</a> Something profound has changed in the relationship between U.S. drivers and their cars.</p><p>Look at the data, and one thing jumps out: A massive generational shift. Millennials just aren't as in love with their wheels as were their forebears. Between 2001 and 2009, the average number of miles driven by 16- to 34-year-olds dropped by 23 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/millennials_save_the_world_smartphones_to_the_rescue/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/millennials_save_the_world_smartphones_to_the_rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Istanbul protest is &#8212; and is not &#8212; about the trees</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/no_this_is_not_just_an_environmental_protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/no_this_is_not_just_an_environmental_protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tayyip Erdogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gezi Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13317964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How a Reuters photo caption managed to marginalize the Gezi Park protests, limit their impact and miss the point]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fight about trees – or so it seemed at the end of last week. The protests first came to the attention of the world through this image. Before journalists had cobbled together their copy, or before their editors had decided that events warranted any, Reuters photographer Osman Orsal’s photo of policemen firing pepper spray at close range in the face of a young girl acted as a widely shared placeholder for the torrent of analysis that was to follow.</p><p>I found the lady in the red dress a problematic icon for the unfolding events in Gezi Park. Not because she was doing anything wrong. Nor was the scene unrepresentative. With the benefit of hindsight her unresisting pose, arms by her side against an ostensibly unprovoked attack by a policeman seems perfectly to have foretold the waves of violence visited on unarmed protesters on the streets of Turkey’s cities in the days since. What troubled me was not the photograph itself but the caption beneath it, which would have its readers believe this was a fight all about trees. This compelling image seemed to be having much success in disseminating the tree narrative. By the 29th of May, the photo was everywhere. In the best tradition of Turkish churnalism, those few who reported the incident <a title="today's zaman red dress" href="http://www.todayszaman.com/news-316733-protestors-stand-guard-at-istanbuls-gezi-park-to-prevent-demolition.html%20??" target="_blank">reprinted Reuters’ incidental analysis wholesale</a>, even after the protests had plainly grown beyond the issue of the park’s redevelopment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/no_this_is_not_just_an_environmental_protest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/no_this_is_not_just_an_environmental_protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could California&#8217;s salmon make a comeback?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/could_californias_salmon_make_a_comeback_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/could_californias_salmon_make_a_comeback_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisheries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnEarth.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13314474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After years of decline, the rich human community that depends on California’s salmon runs may at last be rebounding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.onearth.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/OElogo-e1365090399191.png" alt="OnEarth" /></a>Jon Rosenfield and I bushwhack through the scrubby willows that line the American River east of Sacramento. The air is crisp this October morning, and the timing of our visit should be just right to watch California’s Chinook salmon as they return to where their lives began and spawn the next generation. Rosenfield, a biologist, works for a conservation group called the Bay Institute, and he wants me to witness an annual ritual that future generations might not have the opportunity to see.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/could_californias_salmon_make_a_comeback_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/could_californias_salmon_make_a_comeback_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s promising new hire</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/apples_promising_new_hire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/apples_promising_new_hire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bringing outgoing EPA director Lisa Jackson on board is more than your usual corporate greenwashing exercise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Cook's announcement Tuesday night at the AllThingsD conference that Apple <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113330/apples-smart-hire-former-epa-chief-lisa-jackson#">had hired Lisa Jackson,</a> the director of the Environmental Protection Agency during Obama's first term as president, to "run its environmental initiatives," is the rarest of anomalies in the all-too-familiar revolving door intersection between government and industry. It is genuinely interesting, and provocative.</p><p>Jackson is a career bureaucrat who received high marks from environmentalists for her efforts to take on coal companies, implement higher fuel-economy standards, and get greenhouse gases labeled a "pollutant" under the terms of the Clean Air Act. It is difficult to see her playing the same role with Apple that your typical government regulator assumes when moving into a cushy Wall Street job: helping her new employer game existing laws or lobby for weaker oversight.</p><p>To the contrary; it's much easier to envision Jackson actually empowered to steer Apple into environmentally-friendly waters. There are obvious branding advantages for Apple here. If the company wants to continue to remain perceived as "cool" by young consumers of (relatively) high-priced mobile devices, getting some real environmental street cred can't hurt.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/apples_promising_new_hire/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/apples_promising_new_hire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big coal faces big opposition in Pacific Northwest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/big_coal_faces_big_opposition_in_pacific_northwest_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/big_coal_faces_big_opposition_in_pacific_northwest_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waging Nonviolence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13308609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massive exports flow through the region en route to Asia]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wagingnonviolence.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/wnv.logo_.square.150.jpg" alt="Waging Nonviolence" /></a>Earlier this month, grassroots climate and anti-extraction activists in the Pacific Northwest scored a victory over one of the world’s most powerful industries. Kinder Morgan, an energy company that operates 26,000 miles of pipelines and owns 170 largely energy-related export terminals, announced it is scrapping plans to build a large coal export terminal on the Columbia River. The company has downplayed the role of community opposition to its terminal, claiming logistical considerations led to abandonment of the project. But local activists see more to the story than that.</p><p>Kinder Morgan’s decision to walk away from the Columbia came after months of steady grassroots opposition, and the company made the announcement two days after locals turned out in large numbers at a hearing to oppose the project. For environmental groups in the region, this looks like the culmination of a well-coordinated effort to protect communities along the Columbia from coal pollution.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/big_coal_faces_big_opposition_in_pacific_northwest_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/big_coal_faces_big_opposition_in_pacific_northwest_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois&#8217; fracking and coal rush is a national crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/illinoiss_fracking_and_coal_rush_is_a_national_crisis_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/illinoiss_fracking_and_coal_rush_is_a_national_crisis_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi River]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13308595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Illinois and its Mississippi River banks are becoming another ground zero in the war over climate change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>What happens in Illinois doesn't stay in Illinois -- especially when you're dealing with the national ramifications of a combined fracking and coal mining rush unparalleled in recent memory.</p><p>As a sit-in movement continues at the office of Gov. Pat Quinn in Springfield, Ill., besieged southern Illinois residents who have been left out of backroom legislative negotiations over a controversial and admittedly flawed regulatory fracking bill are calling on the nation to contact Gov. Quinn and Lt. Gov. Lisa Madigan to "put a moratorium on drilling to investigate its full climate and health impacts."</p><p>Residents are also asking for concerned supporters to call members of Illinois' legislature to vote against a bill that health expert Sandra Steingraber has denounced as unscientific and unsafe.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/illinoiss_fracking_and_coal_rush_is_a_national_crisis_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/illinoiss_fracking_and_coal_rush_is_a_national_crisis_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House supporters of KXL received $56m from fossil fuel industry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/house_supporters_of_kxl_received_56m_from_fossil_fuel_industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/house_supporters_of_kxl_received_56m_from_fossil_fuel_industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tarsands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican led House passed a bill that would force Obama to approve the controversial pipeline]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday the house voted 241-175 to pass a bill that declares a presidential permit is not needed to approve the Keystone XL oil pipeline extension currently under consideration. The Northern Route Approval Act is unlikely to garner enough votes in the Senate to overcome a presidential veto, so the decision on the pipeline -- which would carry crude oil from Alberta’s tar sands to the Gulf Coast -- will likely remain in the president's hands.</p><p>Meanwhile, environmental groups have decried Wednesday's House vote as further evidence that Congress has been bought by Big Oil. Oil Change International calculated that supporters of the bill had taken a combined $56 million from the fossil fuel industry, and that individual representatives in support of the bill had on average received six times from oil industry interests than pipeline opponents. Oil Change International highlighted the following findings:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/house_supporters_of_kxl_received_56m_from_fossil_fuel_industry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/house_supporters_of_kxl_received_56m_from_fossil_fuel_industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pollution as ancient Chinese art</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/turning_smog_filled_landscapes_into_works_of_art_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/turning_smog_filled_landscapes_into_works_of_art_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyperallergic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paintings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the help of Photoshop, artist Yao Lu has made shanshui — traditional ink paintings — of China's landfills]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hyperallergic.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/hyperallergic-1.jpg" alt="Hyperallergic" /></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>SAN FRANCISCO — Pollution and health have been on the Chinese mind as of late. From <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/29/dead-pigs-china-water-supply">dead pigs in Shanghai</a> to <a href="http://www.scmp.com/comment/blogs/article/1140115/beijings-crazy-quick-fixes-toxic-air-canned-air-bicycle-powered-air">tips for avoiding bad air in Beijing</a>, a clean environment can be difficult to find. Smog and water pollution have become a feature of China’s urban landscape, creating a hazard not just for Chinese citizens but people all over the world.</p><p>Traditional Chinese ink paintings are often known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanshui">shanshui</a>, or mountain and water. Unfortunately, much of China’s water is no longer drinkable, and its mountains are difficult to find behind the smog. It’s a topic ripe for creative exploration.</p><p><a href="http://hyperallergic.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/yaolu1-e1368169407355.jpg"><img alt="yaolu1" src="http://hyperallergic.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/yaolu1-e1368169407355.jpg" width="320" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/turning_smog_filled_landscapes_into_works_of_art_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/turning_smog_filled_landscapes_into_works_of_art_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why green roofs never work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/whats_the_matter_with_new_yorks_green_roofs_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/whats_the_matter_with_new_yorks_green_roofs_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urban roof gardens should cut energy usage and reduce rainwater runoff. So far, the results have been unimpressive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a></p><div id="attachment_1352"> <p>On a rooftop in New York City’s Chelsea neighborhood, two students are collecting soil samples from boxes planted with species from two native plant communities: Hempstead Plains, which are grasses belonging to a prairie community originally found on Long Island, and Rocky Summit grasslands, which grow on the tops of mountains and ridges throughout southern New England and all of New York State. They carefully place the dirt from the soil core into a plastic bag and seal it up to be taken to the lab for analysis.</p> <p>These two students are part of a research team that is trying to figure out how to maximize the benefits of green roofs. The problem has taken on practical significance as grass and other <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=plants">plants</a> sprout on rooftops all over Manhattan and in other cities. For the past two years, New York City <a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030/html/home/home.shtml" target="_blank">Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s PlaNYC initiative</a> has offered tax abatements for green roof construction and grant money for projects to capture storm <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=water">water</a>. Rooftop gardens have the potential of lowering energy usage for heating and air-conditioning as well as reducing rainwater runoff, but their effectiveness is not well established.</p> <p>Researchers are trying to identify the best plant species suitable to <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=postal-green-roof" target="_blank">green roofs</a>, with an eye to designing ones that fulfill their promise. A 2007 study in the journal BioScience found that green roofs can potentially help <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1641/B571005" target="_blank">manage stormwater runoff</a>, reduce urban heat-island effects and regulate building temperature. To deliver these benefits, rooftop vegetation has to be able to survive the high winds, prolonged UV radiation and unpredictable fluctuations in water availability.<strong> </strong>To resist these harsh environments, a majority of green roofs are planted with sedum, a non-native species that can survive wind and long periods withoutrainfall. A roof planted with sedum, however, is no greener, from the standpoint of sustainability, than is ordinary tar or asphalt.</p> <p>Sedum does not absorb water as efficiently as other plant species, according to Scott MacIvor, a PhD student in biology at York University in Toronto who studies bee and wasp habitats on green roofs there, and co-wrote the city’s new guidelines for biodiverse green roofs.<strong> </strong>At certain times of the year, he says sedum actually absorbs heat instead of reflecting it. “The problem is that sedum plants aren’t really performing on green roofs,” he notes. “They’re just there.” One of the plant’s biggest failings, it turns out, is that it does not encourage <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=biodiversity">biodiversity</a> of plant species on the roof. According to MacIvor’s research, green roofs provide the most benefit when they are <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857410002910" target="_blank">planted with a diverse group of species</a> that are adapted to local conditions.</p> <p>Krista McGuire has taken sedum’s inadequacy as a challenge. The assistant professor of biological sciences at Barnard College wanted to see if a variety of native plants could survive on green roofs and how well they would deliver the desired benefits. Since 2010, the year Bloomberg announced his green roof initiative, McGuire has been comparing soil samples from 10 roofs planted with native vegetation with soil from five city parks spanning New York’s five boroughs, seeking to identify the microbial communities that thrive on green roofs to better to understand how healthy rooftop ecosystems sustain themselves.</p> <p>Her study, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058020" target="_blank">published in PLoS ONE</a> last April,<strong> </strong>found that green roofs have distinct fungal communities that help plants to thrive in harsh, polluted environments and filter heavy metals. On average, 109 different types of fungi were present on each roof including<em> Pseudallescheria fimeti,</em> a fungus that grows in polluted soils and human-dominated environments. Rooftop soil also contained fungi from the genus <em>Peyronellaea,</em> which live in the tissues of plants to help them take in nutrients.</p> <p>McGuire hopes her research will be able to help inform green roof companies on planting the best species for each rooftop. Three of the rooftops, which received more intensive sampling, showed that fungal communities are different from one roof to another. Roofs are microclimates, McGuire says. Fungal growth depends on the position of the roof, pollution levels in the area, temperature and how much rainfall it receives. “Plant species are adapting to new environments,” she says. “Without the fungi, the plants would not be able to grow and survive.”</p> <p>“In the long term, this information may help individuals decide which types of soil microbes to amend on their green roofs, so that they can maximize plant survival and minimize management,” she says.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/whats_the_matter_with_new_yorks_green_roofs_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/whats_the_matter_with_new_yorks_green_roofs_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are streetcars the future of public transportation?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/why_is_the_streetcar_so_hot_right_now_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/why_is_the_streetcar_so_hot_right_now_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnEarth.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cities across the country are relying on the retro transit line to breathe new life into their moribund downtowns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.onearth.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/OElogo-e1365090399191.png" alt="OnEarth" /></a> When President Obama nominated Charlotte, North Carolina, Mayor Anthony Foxx to head the U.S. Department of Transportation last month, he cited among Foxx’s <a href="http://www.wcnc.com/news/local/city-of-charlotte-unveils-electric-vehicle-infrastructure-144223955.html">other</a> <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/10/15/3599137/cats-to-announce-federal-funding.html">relevant</a> <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/05/03/3214327/work-begins-at-rail-cargo-site.html">accomplishments</a> “a new streetcar project that’s going to bring modern electric tram service to [Charlotte’s] downtown area.” All well and good. But honestly, if enthusiasm for downtown streetcar projects was a prerequisite for the job, the president could probably have compiled his short list of candidates simply by closing his eyes and aiming a dart at a wall-mounted map of the lower 48.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/why_is_the_streetcar_so_hot_right_now_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/why_is_the_streetcar_so_hot_right_now_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outrage over bike racks in NYC bike sharing program</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/outrage_over_bike_racks_in_nyc_bike_sharing_program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/outrage_over_bike_racks_in_nyc_bike_sharing_program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bicycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike-sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many well-heeled New Yorkers have turned against the city's bike sharing program, calling the racks a "blight" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With New York City's bike-sharing program set to launch in two weeks, many city residents once in favor of the eco-friendly commuter initiative have turned against it, calling the presence of the rental bike racks on their blocks a "blight," as the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/15/nyregion/complaints-rise-as-bike-share-program-nears.html?pagewanted=2&amp;_r=0&amp;hp" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>“None of us are against bikes — most of us have bikes that we stow in our building,” said Lynn Ellsworth, 54, from TriBeCa. “But why they put these giant racks in these little streets is crazy to me...”</p> <p>Some neighborhood grievances have been predictable: complaints of lost parking and reckless riding, often from those who opposed cycling’s expansion in the city long before bike share. Resident groups that have promised legal action against the city over station locations in Manhattan — including groups from an apartment building at 99 Bank Street in the West Village and from a luxury condominium on East 55th Street — are seen as unlikely to affect the program’s introduction.</p></blockquote><p>A representative from the city's Transportation Department told the Times that a majority of the 200 bike stations have been received without incident, and called concern over sanitation, transit access and other concerns largely unfounded.</p><p>Authorities from the Sanitation Department and Fire Department have not flagged the bike stalls for violations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/outrage_over_bike_racks_in_nyc_bike_sharing_program/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/outrage_over_bike_racks_in_nyc_bike_sharing_program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: climate change risks a third of animals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/study_climate_change_risks_a_third_of_animals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/study_climate_change_risks_a_third_of_animals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The habitats of many common plants and animals poised to shrink dramatically]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a new report in the journal Nature Climate Change, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/12/climate-change-habitat-animal-plant_n_3263046.html">flagged by Reuters</a>, more than half of all plants, a third of animals are at risk to due to destruction of habitats as the climate changes. Last week scientists marked a symbolic but grim <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/">milestone</a> -- carbon dioxide levels reached an average daily level that surpassed 400 parts per million, the highest concentration on Earth in millions of years. With the rise in global temperatures and changing rainfall patterns, the new study finds that many common animals and plants risk extinction:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/study_climate_change_risks_a_third_of_animals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/study_climate_change_risks_a_third_of_animals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CO2 levels pass feared milestone</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists report that the amount of the gas has not been this high in at least 3 million years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what climate scientists are calling a moment that "symbolizes that so far we have failed miserably in tackling this problem,” carbon dioxide levels have reportedly reached a long-feared milestone. The New York Times reported that this concentration of the gas on Earth has not been seen for millions of years. Via the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?hp&amp;_r=0">NYT:</a></p><blockquote><p>Scientific monitors reported that the gas had reached an average daily level that surpassed 400 parts per million — just an odometer moment in one sense, but also a sobering reminder that decades of efforts to bring human-produced emissions under control are faltering.</p> <p>The best available evidence suggests the amount of the gas in the air has not been this high for at least 3 million years, before humans evolved, and scientists believe the rise portends large changes in the climate and the level of the sea.</p> <p>“It symbolizes that so far we have failed miserably in tackling this problem,” said Pieter P. Tans, who runs the monitoring program at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration that reported the new reading.</p> <p>Ralph Keeling, who runs another monitoring program at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, said a continuing rise could be catastrophic. “It means we are quickly losing the possibility of keeping the climate below what people thought were possibly tolerable thresholds,” he said.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s top donors ask him to say no to Keystone XL</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/obamas_top_donors_ask_him_to_say_no_to_keystone_xl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/obamas_top_donors_ask_him_to_say_no_to_keystone_xl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Letter signed by 150 donors, including Taco Bell heir and Gwyneth Paltrow's mom, asks president to reject pipeline]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmental activists have been putting their bodies on the line for months -- both in the form of physical blockades in Texas and rallies in Washington -- to halt the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry crude oil from Alberta’s tar sands to the Gulf Coast. The TransCanada pipeline extension requires Obama's approval, and experts believe he will give it -- a State Department survey of the project (<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/state_dept_hid_oil_industry_ties_in_keystone_xl_report/">written by contractors with ties to the oil industry</a>) has already given the pipeline the green light. On Friday, 150 of the president's most prominent donors, including Vinod Khosla, one of the founders of Sun Microsystems; Rob McKay, the heir to the Taco Bell fortune and chairman of the Democracy Alliance; Blythe Danner, the actor and mother of Gwyneth Paltrow; and Susie Tompkins Buell, co-founder of the Esprit clothing, wrote to the president urging he reject the pipeline.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/obamas_top_donors_ask_him_to_say_no_to_keystone_xl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/obamas_top_donors_ask_him_to_say_no_to_keystone_xl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the &#8220;family values,&#8221; anti-environment hypocrites</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/pro_family_values_anti_environment_hypocrites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/pro_family_values_anti_environment_hypocrites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Drudge Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the right wing is so concerned with family, why can't it make slight sacrifices to avert disaster for our kids?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/">newspaper column</a> on Friday highlighted an easy to understand fact: According to <a href="http://www.worldwatch.org/files/pdf/Livestock%20and%20Climate%20Change.pdf">World Bank data</a>, the livestock industry is responsible for between 18 percent and 51 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions. My column also predicted that by simply mentioning that fact, I would receive all sorts of angry email and tweets from conservatives not refuting the data, but declaring that they will eat even more meat to prove some incoherent point about "freedom." And not surprisingly, over the weekend, the prediction came true, especially after Drudge posted a link to an <a href="http://cnsnews.com/blog/dan-gainor/lefty-sirota-we-are-incinerating-planetbecause-too-many-us-eat-cheeseburgers">outraged screed</a> about the column (notice: The screed didn't bother to include one single data point or fact in refutation of the World Bank study).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/pro_family_values_anti_environment_hypocrites/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/pro_family_values_anti_environment_hypocrites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 reasons why Obama should push for a carbon tax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even a minor tax would create jobs and federal revenue, not to mention help the environment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> We are at an unacknowledged turning point for the economy and the environment. We could, right now, substantially reduce our debt and deficit projections, take a major step toward a better environment, create a simpler and fairer tax system, make job creation easier, and raise economic growth a bit. For all of these reasons, we could and should adopt a carbon tax.</p><p>Taking this step depends on two men: President Obama and Senator Max Baucus, chair of the Senate Finance Committee. Both men want to leave an important legacy, and both are in a unique political position: they still possess real political power, but neither will ever face another election. (Obama, of course, is limited to two terms, and Baucus has just announced that he will retire.) Acting together, the two of them could completely change the odds of enacting a carbon tax this year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cicadas prepare to invade by the billions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/cicadas_prepare_to_invade_by_the_billions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/cicadas_prepare_to_invade_by_the_billions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cicada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cicadas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17 year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But climate change may mean it's the last time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cicadas have black bodies, blood-red eyes and legs, delicately veined gossamer wings and oddly ridged faces that resemble the Klingons from “Star Trek.” Entomologist Cole Gilbert finds them “amazing.” And after listening to him discourse about the species over lunch late last month, I think I understand why. Cicadas (<em>Magicicada septendecim</em>) -- like many of the species Gilbert studies -- are just plain weird.</p><p>The Pilgrims called cicadas “17 year locusts,” because some of them survive for that long underground, sucking the sap from roots, between periodic emergences in epic swarms. Locusts are in the grasshopper family, however, and cicadas are garish relatives of spittle bugs and crickets. Beyond that we know precious little about cicadas' mysterious lives under the earth. And we don’t understand why they wait 17 years between appearances (for some subgroups it’s 13 years, and there are also annuals.) Why 17? Why 13? We also don’t have a clue how these brainless arthropods manage to keep track of the passing years. And how exactly do cicada nymphs know when to all come wiggling out of the soil on cue, emerging within hours of one another after spending over a decade interred?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/cicadas_prepare_to_invade_by_the_billions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/cicadas_prepare_to_invade_by_the_billions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELF activist rearrested for writing blog post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/elf_activist_rearrested_for_writing_blog_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/elf_activist_rearrested_for_writing_blog_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel mcgowan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Liberation Front]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel McGowan, recently released into a halfway house, is back in federal detention reportedly over HuffPo column]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel McGowan, an environmental activist who spent seven years in federal prison after pleading guilty to arson charges relating to Earth Liberation Front actions, has been jailed again. McGowan was released into a halfway house earlier this year, but was returned Thursday to a federal detention center in Manhattan, reportedly because of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-mcgowan/communication-management-units_b_2944580.html">a column he wrote last week on HuffPo</a>, in which he decried his treatment in prison.</p><p>McGowan wrote about how between 2008 and 2010 he served time in the Communication Management Unit (CMU) at the U.S. Penitentiary in Marion, Ill. The unit, dubbed "Little Guantanamo," sees prisoners isolated from other inmates and severely restricted in their contact with their families and the outside world. In his column, McGowan charged that he was put in the CMU because of his political beliefs -- a court document revealed that he was apparently transferred in part because of his communications with the outside world, writing to contacts in radical and environmentalist communities.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/elf_activist_rearrested_for_writing_blog_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/elf_activist_rearrested_for_writing_blog_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Billionaire pledges to &#8220;destroy&#8221; climate skeptics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom steyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obscenely wealthy retired hedge fund manager will use strength of money in politics to environmental ends]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California billionaire Tom Steyer is setting himself up as a sort of anti-Koch. The retired hedge fund manager told the Hill that he will dedicate a fortune to fighting climate change through political donations -- "he wants to make climate change a campaign issue for years to come and Democratic support for environmental protections as widespread as support for gay marriage and immigration reform," noted the Hill.</p><p>Of course, activists concerned with campaign finance reform and the undue influence of money in politics will not welcome Steyer's pledge. Others might be pleased that the Koch support for climate skeptical policy will have a match. In the parlance appropriate to an aggressive financier, the green capitalist told the Hill that he planned to "destroy" climate skeptics and sought a "smashing victory." Via<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/291559-greens-get-billionaire-ally-money#ixzz2PQG9bYzy"> the Hill:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/billionaire_pledges_to_destroy_climate_skeptics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>