<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Erick Erickson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/erick_erickson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Erick Erickson, Internet comedian, jokes about reproductive rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/erick_erickson_internet_comedian_jokes_about_reproductive_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/erick_erickson_internet_comedian_jokes_about_reproductive_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He'll be here all week, folks ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it's hard to believe, what with all of his talk about female breadwinners being "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/megyn_kelly_slams_erick_erickson_lou_dobbs_over_sexist_breadwinners_comments/" target="_blank">anti-science</a>" and his fixation on the "panties" of "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/erick_erickson_makes_it_worse/" target="_blank">emo lefties</a>,"  but Erick Erickson is not a professional Internet comedian. He is a conservative pundit who gets paid money to share his ideas (about emo panties) on television and radio.</p><p>On Monday, Erickson posted a photo from the reproductive rights rally happening outside the Texas Capitol in advance of the legislature's special session, and asked if what he was seeing was "Salon's editorial board."</p><p>While we're flattered by the comparison, many of Erickson's Twitter followers were quick to point out his mistake.</p><p>[embedtweet id="351769549948977154"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="351772934559371267"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="351771461263953921"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="351771285161906176"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="351771424479911937"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/erick_erickson_internet_comedian_jokes_about_reproductive_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/erick_erickson_internet_comedian_jokes_about_reproductive_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megyn Kelly slams Erick Erickson, Lou Dobbs over sexist &#8220;breadwinners&#8221; comments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/megyn_kelly_slams_erick_erickson_lou_dobbs_over_sexist_breadwinners_comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/megyn_kelly_slams_erick_erickson_lou_dobbs_over_sexist_breadwinners_comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megyn Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loud dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13314145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Why should we take your word for it, Erick Erickson's science, instead of all of these experts?," Kelly asks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly slammed Lou Dobbs and Erick Erickson on Friday over the pundits' sexist (and entirely unsupported by decades of research) pronouncements about working mothers and the "decline" of the American family.</p><p>In a segment hosted by Dobbs on Wednesday, Erickson called female breadwinners "anti-science," "bad for kids and bad for marriage;" Dobbs later chimed in to say that the rise of female-headed households and single mothers are both "troubling" developments.</p><p>After sparring with Dobbs (who, in one of the video's most infuriating moments, condescendingly refers to Kelly as "Oh Dominant One"), Kelly moves on to Erickson, who she shreds for ignoring decades of research about working mothers in favor of his own conclusions about gender, work and parenting.</p><p>"Why should we take your word for it, Erick Erickson's science, instead of all of these experts?," Kelly asks.</p><p>Because scientists have an agenda, (total and utterly agendaless) Erickson replies.</p><p>Watch the full exchange below:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rbvSn0Vp4pE" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/megyn_kelly_slams_erick_erickson_lou_dobbs_over_sexist_breadwinners_comments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/megyn_kelly_slams_erick_erickson_lou_dobbs_over_sexist_breadwinners_comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erick Erickson makes it worse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/erick_erickson_makes_it_worse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/erick_erickson_makes_it_worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pro-tip: When accused of sexism, don’t reference your opponents’ "panties"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick Erickson, the conservative blogger and Fox News personality, became the most hated man on Twitter today after responding to a much-discussed <a href="http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/29/breadwinner-moms/#chapter-1-overview">Pew survey</a> on female breadwinners by saying that science says that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/fox_news_rise_of_female_breadwinners_will_destroy_society_as_we_know_it/singleton/">men should dominate women</a> (to be fair to Erickson, Juan Williams and Lou Dobbs expressed equally retrograde sentiments on the very same segment, but have largely escaped the drubbing).</p><p>Erickson tried to clear things up with <a href="http://www.redstate.com/2013/05/30/the-truth-may-hurt-but-is-not-mean/">a blog post</a> this afternoon, but only made matters worse by showing how much he doesn't get it. The missive started off poorly, with some whining about how feminists and "emo lefties have their panties in a wad" (pro-tip: when accused of sexism, don't reference your opponents' panties while mounting your defense) and only got worse from there.</p><p>First there was a science lesson:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/erick_erickson_makes_it_worse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/erick_erickson_makes_it_worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>147</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News: Rise of female breadwinners will destroy society as we know it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/fox_news_rise_of_female_breadwinners_will_destroy_society_as_we_know_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/fox_news_rise_of_female_breadwinners_will_destroy_society_as_we_know_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in the workforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Research Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An all-male collection of Fox pundits panic in unison about working women, say "something's going terribly wrong"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The men of Fox News responded to a Pew Research Report revealing that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/nearly_40_percent_of_mothers_are_family_breadwinners/" target="_blank">40 percent of American mothers are their family's sole or primary breadwinner</a> with predictable moral panic and ridiculous pronouncements about society's downfall.</p><p>Behold Juan Williams:</p><blockquote><p>What we're seeing with four out of 10 families, now the woman is the primary breadwinner. You're seeing the disintegration of marriage, you're seeing men who were hard hit by the economic recession in ways that women weren't. But you're seeing, I think, systemically, larger than the political stories that we follow every day, something going terribly wrong in American society, and it's hurting our children, and it's going to have impact for generations to come.</p></blockquote><p>Marvel at Erick Erickson:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/fox_news_rise_of_female_breadwinners_will_destroy_society_as_we_know_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/fox_news_rise_of_female_breadwinners_will_destroy_society_as_we_know_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New pope: Best of the worst reactions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/new_pope_best_of_the_worst_reactions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/new_pope_best_of_the_worst_reactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope Francis I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best of the worst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives, shrill liberals and other idiots take to Twitter over Francis I, and Erick Erickson takes the cake]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/cardinal_bergoglio_archbishop_of_buenos_aires_is_new_pope/">There's a new pope</a> -- Francis I -- who unsurprisingly has terrible views on gay and reproductive rights. He has somewhat better views on poverty and inequality. He personally helped Argentina's right-wing military junta hold political prisoners after 1976. And here's what the best of the worst of Twitter has to say about it (worst/best of all, Erick Erickson):</p><p>[embedtweet id="311930145382486017"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="311939252286025729"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="311927675587530752"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="311936079282462720"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="311935971782447105"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="311923395166089217"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="311935738692382721"]</p><p>But, for some relief, here are some great reactions to the new pope:</p><p>[embedtweet id="311931171804164098"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="311932878453866497"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="311937060367896577"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="311930109332430849"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/new_pope_best_of_the_worst_reactions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/new_pope_best_of_the_worst_reactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A kinder, gentler Erick Erickson?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/a_kinder_gentler_erick_erickson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/a_kinder_gentler_erick_erickson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erickson, who once called David Souter a "goat-f*cker," says conservatives have become "purveyors of outrage"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN contributor and RedState blogger Erick Erickson is getting sick of the "outrage pimps on both sides of the aisle whipping the respective bases into a frenzy and fury against the other side," including conservatives who have become what he describes as "purveyors of outrage instead of preachers for a cause."</p><p>"We’re off key and off message," Erickson <a href="http://www.redstate.com/2013/01/20/the-loyal-opposition/">wrote in a blog post</a> earlier this week. "We’ve become professional victims dialed up to 10 on the outrage meter. Who the hell wants to listen to conservatives whining and moaning all the time about the outrage du jour? Seriously?"</p><p>But if anyone is prone to "purveying outrage"... Here is a brief history of some of Erickson's greatest hits:</p><ul> <li>In 2008, he wondered in a blog post:  “Is Obama shagging hookers behind the media’s back?” But, he <a style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;" href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/erick_erickson_howard_kurtz/">concluded</a><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">: “I assume not. I assume that Obama’s Marxist harpy wife would go Lorena Bobbit on him should he even think about it.”</li> <li>In 2009, at the height of the health care debate, Erickson <a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/redstates-erickson-compares-wh-health-care-spox-to-joseph-goebbels.php?ref=fpblg">compared</a> White House health care spokeswoman Linda Douglass to the Nazi's chief propagandist:</span></li> </ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/a_kinder_gentler_erick_erickson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/a_kinder_gentler_erick_erickson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative activists to GOP lawmakers: You are being tested</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/conservative_activists_to_gop_lawmakers_you_are_being_tested/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/conservative_activists_to_gop_lawmakers_you_are_being_tested/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morton Blackwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phyllis Schlafly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedState]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group of right-wing movers and shakers sent a letter urging Republicans to stand up to the "liberal apparatus"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center">A group of big right-wing activists wrote an open letter to House and Senate Republicans, telling them they are "entering into a period of testing," wherein their conservative principles will be challenged and "the whole leftist apparatus is gearing up to panic you and to force you to cave in. Don’t do it."</p><p style="text-align: left;" align="center">The letter, posted by conservative columnist Morton Blackwell on <a href="http://www.redstate.com/morton_c_blackwell/2012/11/30/an-open-letter-to-u-s-house-and-senate-republicans/">RedState.com</a>, urges lawmakers to be strong against the liberals' "current power grabs."</p><p>"If Republicans cave in now, when it really counts, next time you will be weaker, because your conservative base will be outraged," the letter says. "Many who worked hard to elect you in the past will never lift a finger for you again."</p><p>The letter concludes:</p><blockquote><p>So it’s in the interest of the country and in your personal interest for you to use the power you unquestionably have now to stand firm and not surrender your conservative principles, no matter how loud the clamor of people whose central interest is to advance the left’s agenda.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/conservative_activists_to_gop_lawmakers_you_are_being_tested/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/conservative_activists_to_gop_lawmakers_you_are_being_tested/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The right turns on Boehner after committee &#8220;purge&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_right_turns_on_boehner_after_committee_purge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_right_turns_on_boehner_after_committee_purge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Malkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Huelskamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13115197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House speaker removed four conservatives from their committee seats for bucking party leadership]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right is outraged with House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, for "purging" four conservatives from their prime committee posts because they bucked party leadership in key votes.</p><p>Reps. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan., and Justin Amash, R-Mich., lost their positions on the House Budget Committee for the next session. And Walter Jones, R-N.C., and  David Schweikert, R-Ariz., were booted from the House Financial Services Committee.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/gop_leaders_remove_4_from_plum_house_committees_3/">AP</a>:</p><blockquote><p>All four lawmakers had voted against the summer 2011 deal negotiated between Republican leaders and President Barack Obama for extending the government’s ability to borrow money in exchange for $1 trillion in spending cuts and the promise of another $1 trillion in reduced deficits. Three of the four, the exception being Schweikert, voted against the Ryan-written GOP budget blueprint that the House passed last March.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_right_turns_on_boehner_after_committee_purge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_right_turns_on_boehner_after_committee_purge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erick Erickson will not run for Senate after all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/erick_erickson_will_not_run_for_senate_after_all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/erick_erickson_will_not_run_for_senate_after_all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saxby Chambliss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative pundit says he won't make a bid for Saxby Chambliss' seat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN contributor and RedState blogger Erick Erickson thought a lot about it, and decided not to challenge Saxby Chambliss in 2014.</p><p>“Were I to run for the Senate, it would be a terribly nasty campaign,” Erickson <a href="http://www.redstate.com/2012/11/30/self-awareness-matters/">wrote</a> on RedState. “I’m not putting my family through that when the best outcome would mean a sizable pay cut in pay and being away from my kids and wife all the time huddled in a pit of vipers often surrounded by too many who viewed me as a useful instrument to their own advancement.”</p><p>Chambliss has of late been targeted by conservatives because he recently backed away from his support for Grover Norquist's tax pledge. Herman Cain has also been floated as a potential Chambliss challenger, though he told the <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/28/herman-cain-not-interested-in-u-s-senate-seat/">Daily Caller</a> that it's not likely: “My attention will be on exposing the economic pain and suffering to come from a second Obama term, [rather] than on a decision Senator Chambliss made,” Cain said. “No, I’m not running!”</p><p>Erickson, for his part, insisted that his brief consideration of a run was not "just some effort of self promotion," but a response to "the efforts of several and the financial pledges of support."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/erick_erickson_will_not_run_for_senate_after_all/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/erick_erickson_will_not_run_for_senate_after_all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erick Erickson mulling a challenge to Saxby Chambliss</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/erick_erickson_mulling_a_challenge_to_saxby_chambliss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/erick_erickson_mulling_a_challenge_to_saxby_chambliss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedState]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saxby Chambliss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CNN contributor and RedState blogger says he was approached about a primary run in Georgia]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick Erickson, the conservative activist and CNN contributor, says he is giving serious thought to challenging Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., in the 2014 primary.</p><p>"I had been rather dismissive of it, but in the past two days have been approached by several organizations and individuals I greatly respect who have asked me to really consider it," Erickson said, <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/28/conservative-activist-and-cnn-contributor-considers-primary-bid/">according to</a> CNN. "I owe them that and will consider it, but am not prepared to commit to it. I have plenty of time to think about it."</p><p>Chambliss has become a recent target of conservatives for backing away from Grover Norquist's anti-tax pledge.</p><p>"Whether it is me or someone else, conservatives should make beating Saxby Chambliss their chief cause in primary season 2014," Erickson said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/erick_erickson_mulling_a_challenge_to_saxby_chambliss/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/erick_erickson_mulling_a_challenge_to_saxby_chambliss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erick Erickson defends Rubio</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/erick_erickson_defends_rubio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/erick_erickson_defends_rubio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedState]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RedState blogger writes about Marco Rubio's flirtation with creationism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RedState blogger and CNN contributor Erick Erickson defended Marco Rubio, who has been <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/rubio_flirts_with_creationism/">slammed</a> for dipping a toe into creationism this week.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.redstate.com/2012/11/20/i-believe-and-am-thankful/">RedState</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Marco Rubio is getting beaten up by the press for not decisively and convincingly saying he thinks the world is billions of years old. It has become the new litmus test in the media. Believing what was believed to be literally true for a few thousand years is now nutty. Christian homeschool kids, often taught that the world is not as old as some believe and who routinely kick the rear ends of the ivy prep kids in academics, are considered stupid.</p> <p>Truth be told, I think the world is billions of years old, but I have no doubt God created it.</p></blockquote><p>But, Erickson continued:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/erick_erickson_defends_rubio/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/erick_erickson_defends_rubio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative pundit: &#8220;I don’t think much of Obama’s “us”</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/conservative_pundit_i_don%e2%80%99t_think_much_of_obama%e2%80%99s_%e2%80%9cus%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/conservative_pundit_i_don%e2%80%99t_think_much_of_obama%e2%80%99s_%e2%80%9cus%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: Right-wing writers survey the wreckage. Now with more bile!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Republicans’ first writings about last night’s defeat there was bitterness, doomsaying, defiance and contempt, sure, but also hints at how the party needs to reform if it’s going to compete in 21stcentury America:</p><p><strong>Ben Shapiro, <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/06/War-More-Years">Breitbart.com</a></strong></p><blockquote><p>With Mitt Romney’s projected defeat in the presidential race tonight, Americans are very clearly divided into two camps.</p> <p>The first camp is those who want a country of unending bailouts, of free giveaways, of government-provided goods and services – a camp of Americans who want to forfeit the future to guarantee ease and comfort in the present. The second camp is those who understand that that world is unsustainable, who recognize that freedom is the only guarantor of the present and the future.</p></blockquote><p><strong>Jennifer Rubin, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/obama-reelected/2012/11/06/8b00b480-2892-11e2-96b6-8e6a7524553f_blog.html">Washington Post</a></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/conservative_pundit_i_don%e2%80%99t_think_much_of_obama%e2%80%99s_%e2%80%9cus%e2%80%9d/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/conservative_pundit_i_don%e2%80%99t_think_much_of_obama%e2%80%99s_%e2%80%9cus%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day: &#8220;Not winning&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/quote_of_the_day_not_winning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/quote_of_the_day_not_winning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quote of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13014411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erick Erickson has all but given up on Mitt Romney]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative blogger Erick Erickson wrote a column Monday, called "If The Election Were Held Today Barack Obama Would Win." It's pretty self-explanatory:</p><blockquote><p>"Contra Dick Morris, Mitt Romney is not winning this election. At least Mitt Romney is not winning the election right now. Conservatives are obsessing over every poll, the turn out models used, and the media bias that is on ful display. Yes, some of the polling models seem screwy, though we all forget the pollsters apply a secret sauce known only to them on top. Yes, reporters are fully beclowning themselves to get their god-king re-elected. But while we may be focused there, the fact is the Romney campaign isn’t functioning well. Lucky for you and me the election is not today. But something needs to happen in Boston and I am less and less hopeful anything will happen."</p></blockquote><p>In response, Romney campaign adviser Bay Buchanan dismissed Erickson's post, saying on MSNBC that "Erick Erickson has never been with us ... This is Governor Romney's campaign and he is running it and it is his message."</p><p>Erickson <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/romney-adviser-erick-erickson-has-never-been-with">responded</a> to Buchanan in a tweet:</p><p>[embedtweet id="247689368725241856"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/quote_of_the_day_not_winning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/quote_of_the_day_not_winning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petition for CNN to fire Erick Erickson gets more than 100k signatures</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/petition_for_cnn_to_fire_erick_erickson_gets_up_to_100k_signatures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/petition_for_cnn_to_fire_erick_erickson_gets_up_to_100k_signatures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13004689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After he referred to the DNC as the "Vagina Monologues"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this be the final straw for Erick "David Souter is a "goat-f*cker" Erickson?</p><p>Erickson, who's both a CNN contributor and blogger for the conservative website Red State, is being targeted by a women's advocacy group after he tweeted this about the female speakers during day one of the DNC:</p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>First night of the Vagina Monologues in Charlotte going as expected.</p> <p>— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) <a href="https://twitter.com/EWErickson/status/243144183529996288" data-datetime="2012-09-05T00:31:05+00:00">September 5, 2012</a></p></blockquote><p>He tweeted an apology shortly after:</p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>My apologies to those offended by my tweet.Wasn't my intention.</p> <p>— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) <a href="https://twitter.com/EWErickson/status/243154874630557696" data-datetime="2012-09-05T01:13:34+00:00">September 5, 2012</a></p></blockquote><p>But that wasn't enough for the women's advocacy group UltraViolet, which shortly after <a href="http://act.weareultraviolet.org/sign/erickson/?akid=170.366452.Fqqaii&amp;rd=1&amp;t=4">launched</a> a petition to get him yanked off of CNN. "Seriously?" the petition asks. "He hears powerful, eloquent women talking about crucial issues and that's his reaction? Perhaps it shouldn't be that surprising, given his history of insulting women." It then noted how Erickson defended Rush Limbaugh's attack on Sandra Fluke.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/petition_for_cnn_to_fire_erick_erickson_gets_up_to_100k_signatures/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/petition_for_cnn_to_fire_erick_erickson_gets_up_to_100k_signatures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6. Erick Erickson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Hack List 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10431391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative blogger combines vitriol with stupidity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick Erickson is a generic right-wing blogger whose only notable quality as a commentator is his cowardly unwillingness to stand behind the various vitriolic things he says and writes. He's not a good writer or interesting thinker or particularly funny or savvy. His idea of a good gag is calling David Souter a "goat-fucking child molester" and then deleting that tweet and then hastily rewriting it when he got called on it and then <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/erick_erickson_howard_kurtz/">crying to Howard Kurtz that he regretted ever writing it.</a></p><p>Even the many vile and stupid things he says are repetitive and predictable. He's called Barack Obama <a href="http://gawker.com/5379998/erick-erickson-makes-the-dumbest-hitler-analogies?comment=15972707:15972707">a Nazi on multiple occasions</a>, for crimes like "criticizing the insurance industry" and "wanting to host the Olympics." Who can forget the time he <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/red-states-erik-erickson-writes-judge-s">idly wondered when citizens</a> would "march down to their state legislator's house, pull him outside, and beat him to a bloody pulp" over a Washington state proposal to regulate phosphates in dishwasher detergent? That's quality political analysis right there! No wonder CNN hired him!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RedState blogger has amazing Herman Cain theory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/redstate_blogger_has_amazing_herman_cain_theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/redstate_blogger_has_amazing_herman_cain_theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedState]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10184623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the media reporting on the Penn State scandal to hurt conservatives? One insane person thinks so]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the midst of <a href="http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2011/11/09/ohio-obamacare-vote-is-a-perfect-illustration-of-pelosi%E2%80%99s-radically-out-of-touch-mental-state/">an otherwise routine post</a> celebrating Ohio voters' decision to symbolically demonstrate their disapproval of a healthcare reform rule that has yet to go into effect and bemoaning the media's conspiracy of silence on said decision, RedState diarist Dan Perrin makes this totally sane and reasonable observation:</p><blockquote><p>So, this morning, were the lead stories on television that Nancy Pelosi, whose belittling and famous “Are you serious? Are you serious?” response to being asked about the challenge to the ObamaCare individual mandate, was the perfect illustration of her radical and out-of-touch mental state — and that she is as out of touch as former President Bush was when he expressed amazement at grocery store price scanners?</p> <p>Uh, no. <strong>(The media’s obsession with the Penn State sex scandal can be explained by the fact they think it will hurt Herman Cain.)</strong></p></blockquote><p>Emphasis very much mine, because, <em>wow.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/redstate_blogger_has_amazing_herman_cain_theory/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/redstate_blogger_has_amazing_herman_cain_theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The tragic, hilarious &#8220;We Are the 53 percent&#8221; movement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/12/the_tragic_hilarious_we_are_the_53_percent_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/12/the_tragic_hilarious_we_are_the_53_percent_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10109081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives launch a campaign against the poor and the old -- so we're launching one too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conservative response to the <a href="http://wearethe99percent.tumblr.com/">"We are the 99 percent"</a> movement is ... hilarious. (And, sure, <a href="http://gawker.com/5848488/the-right+wing-version-of-we-are-the-99-percent-heartbreaking">heartbreaking.</a>) Conservative filmmaker Mike Wilson and vacuous right-blogger Erick Erickson joined forces to start <a href="http://the53.tumblr.com/">"We Are the 53%,"</a> a blog made up of contributions from the 53 percent of Americans who pay more in federal income taxes than they receive back in deductions or credits.</p><p>The project was kicked off by Erick Erickson, <a href="http://the53.tumblr.com/post/11055265485/ewerickson-declares-hes-one-of-the-53">who announced that he works "three jobs,"</a> by which he means being a professional television pundit, radio pundit and Internet pundit. There is a stunning amount of cognitive dissonance, misplaced resentment and class revulsion going on, even for a conservative Web project.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/12/the_tragic_hilarious_we_are_the_53_percent_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/12/the_tragic_hilarious_we_are_the_53_percent_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>