<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > ESPN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/espn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wait, who cares about Hank Williams Jr.&#8217;s politics?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/espn_pulls_hank_williams_jr_monday_night_football/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/espn_pulls_hank_williams_jr_monday_night_football/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The country singer put his boot in his mouth, but who looks to the "All My Rowdy Friends" singer for insight?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you had a football game and nobody won? It's true that Tampa Bay defeated the Indianapolis Colts last night on "Monday Night Football," but on the field of pointless gestures, the battle between ESPN and Hank Williams Jr. was a draw.</p><p>For 20 years now, Williams's cry of "Are you ready for some football?" from his anthemic "All My Rowdy Friends" has been the Pavlov bell that brings football fans to their television sets. <a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/03/williams-bumped-from-monday-night-football/">But not last night.</a></p><p>Why? Because earlier Monday, Williams shot his mouth off on "Fox and Friends." After being introduced as "the voice of Monday Night Football" who "knows a little about politics," Williams quickly embraced his new role as pundit, saying he didn't like any of the GOP candidates and referring to the golf summit between the president and House Speaker John Boehner as "one of the biggest political mistakes."</p><p>"It would be like Hitler playing golf with Netanyahu, OK?" he explained. "Not hardly." Is it any wonder that on Monday's broadcast, even the reliably nonsense-minded hosts of Fox and Friends seemed unable to make heads or tails of what Williams was saying? When pressed for clarification, Williams said, "You know, they're the enemy. They're the enemy…" He then spelled it out: "Obama!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/espn_pulls_hank_williams_jr_monday_night_football/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/espn_pulls_hank_williams_jr_monday_night_football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The woman who could save ESPN</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/28/mary_jo_kane_espn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/28/mary_jo_kane_espn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/28/mary_jo_kane_espn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mary Jo Kane has long criticized sexism in sports. Now, the media critic is entering the belly of the beast]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to sports and media and guy stuff, ESPN is the big, hairy monster. It's a towel-flicking electronic locker room with a big sign on the door that seems to say, "For Boys Only!"</p><p>When it comes to sports and media and gender issues, <a href="http://www.cehd.umn.edu/kls/faculty/maryjo.htm">Mary Jo Kane</a> is among the nation's most outspoken critics of the sexualized imaging of women athletes -- what was Venus Williams wearing!?!? -- and a dogged chronicler of scant coverage of women's athletics on sports pages and TV channels.</p><p>A University of Minnesota professor and director of the Tucker Center for Research on Girls &amp; Women in Sports, Kane is the author of such page-turning journal articles as "Sexual stories as resistance narratives in women's sports: Reconceptualizing identity performance" and "Expanding the boundaries of sport media research: Using critical theory to explore consumer responses to representations of women's sports."</p><p>So, who'da thunk that the good professor would be asked inside the macho ESPN tent?</p><p>Kane has joined an advisory panel that will guide the ESPN behemoth on its future coverage of women's sports and women athletes. In fact, ESPN is in the process of launching a new business and digital platform called espnW . . . which stands for ESPN women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/28/mary_jo_kane_espn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/28/mary_jo_kane_espn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spain bests Netherlands 1-0 in World Cup final</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/11/soc_wcup_world_cup_final_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/11/soc_wcup_world_cup_final_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/11/soc_wcup_world_cup_final_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Spaniards need an extra time goal to prevail over their Dutch foes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spain rules the soccer world, winning the World Cup at long, long last.</p><p>It came after an exhausting 1-0 victory in extra time over the Netherlands on Sunday. Two years after winning the European title, the stylish Spaniards did even better.</p><p>This was a physical test of attrition that sometimes turned dirty -- a finals-record 11 yellow cards were handed out and the Dutch finished with 10 men. In the end, it was Andres Iniesta breaking free in the penalty area, taking a pass from Cesc Fabregas and putting a right-footed shot from 8 yards just past the outstretched arms of goalkeeper Maarten Stekelenburg.</p><p>For the Dutch and their legions of orange-clad fans wearing everything from jerseys to jumpsuits to clown gear to pajamas, it was yet another crushing disappointment.</p><p>Their first World Cup title tantalizingly within reach, they failed in the final for the third time. This one might have been the most bitter because, unlike in 1974 and 1978, the Netherlands was unbeaten not only in this tournament, but in qualifying for the first World Cup staged in South Africa.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/11/soc_wcup_world_cup_final_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/11/soc_wcup_world_cup_final_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I don&#8217;t buy it anymore, LeBron James</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/lebron_james_sports_cynicism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/lebron_james_sports_cynicism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LeBron James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/09/lebron_james_sports_cynicism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His TV-special betrayal of Cleveland fans showed sports for the ugly, cynical business it is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sports haters, you're right. You've always been right. Before <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/lebron_james/index.html">LeBron James'</a> televised "Decision" last night about where he'd sign as a free agent, I had a response to those who responded to sports talk with a "who cares?" Sports are a microcosm of life. They give us a template for collective experience. "There's value in the trivial," I would bleat.</p><p>Not anymore. There's nothing of value here. If sports are revealing of culture, then I hate our dumb, callous, corporate guts. This is all a cynical exercise in futility. We as fans are choosing to live vicariously through people who quite possibly hate us, or at least wouldn't mind manipulating us for a better TV rating. In the run-up to LeBron's announcement that he would leave his hometown Cleveland Cavaliers to play for the Miami Heat, I <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/07/08/lebron/index.html">defended every sordid aspect</a> of the exercise as great theater. The free agent hype was like the unveiling of a new Apple product or Harry Potter book. Detractors were merely stuck in the throes of humorless jealousy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/lebron_james_sports_cynicism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/lebron_james_sports_cynicism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LeBron James&#8217; &#8220;Decision&#8221; gets big ratings for ESPN</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/lebron_james_espn_ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/lebron_james_espn_ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LeBron James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2010/07/09/lebron_james_espn_ratings</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expected to be the highest rated news show in network's history. Huge numbers in Cleveland]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early television ratings for ESPN indicate there was twice as much interest in LeBron James' decision on where to play in the city he is leaving than in the city he's going to.</p><p>The Nielsen Co.'s overnight measurement in the nation's 56 biggest cities show more than seven of every 100 homes with television sets was tuned to ESPN to see where James would play. It's expected to be the biggest audience ESPN has ever gotten for a news program.</p><p>In Cleveland, "The Decision" drew a staggering 26 rating -- meaning more than one in four homes had TVs tuned to ESPN to see James say he was leaving his hometown Cavaliers for the Miami Heat.</p><p>In Miami, the show had a 12.8 rating.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/lebron_james_espn_ratings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/lebron_james_espn_ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESPN is betting big on the World Cup</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/espn_world_cup_coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/espn_world_cup_coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/feature/2010/06/08/espn_world_cup_coverage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sports network shelled out $100 million for rights to the next two soccer showdowns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowledgeable U.S. soccer fans -- it's not an oxymoron.</p><p>ESPN is making a huge investment in World Cup coverage, paying $100 million for the rights to the 2010 and 2014 tournaments, based on the conviction that not only do Americans know the beautiful game, they want all they can get.</p><p>The 2006 tournament on ESPN and ABC drew the largest audiences for a World Cup outside the United States. But research afterward showed the network could do more to show fans it's taking the sport seriously.</p><p>Now the network is trying to do just that, and to attract even more viewers, despite the time zone challenges of this year's event in South Africa, which is six hours ahead of New York and nine hours ahead of Los Angeles.</p><p>"The simple math of ratings, if you can take that audience and get them to watch for a longer period of time, it has the same effect as growing the number of viewers," said Jed Drake, executive producer for ESPN's World Cup coverage. "We really have targeted our presentation now for a knowledgeable soccer audience."</p><p>The same network that drew criticism for calling 20 matches from U.S. studios four years ago is putting together a staff of 300 people to produce the event in South Africa. ESPN has hired British announcers and plans 65 hours of live studio programming from Johannesburg.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/espn_world_cup_coverage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/espn_world_cup_coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Kornheiser: ESPN&#8217;s latest screw-up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/24/espn_hannah_storm_foul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/24/espn_hannah_storm_foul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/02/24/espn_hannah_storm_foul</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kornheiser suspended after cracks about Storm -- and the network with a perpetual foot in its mouth strikes again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, ESPN, you really are the knuckle-draggingest, forehead-slappingest, still working on getting opposable thumbiest network out there.</p><p>Was it only last month you ditched <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2010/01/29/this_week_in_shirley/index.html">Paul Shirley</a> after his kooky <a href="http://www.flipcollective.com/2010/01/26/if-you-rebuild-it-they-will-come-by-paul-shirley/">open letter to the people of Haiti</a> in which he requested, among other gems, "Could you not resort to the creation of flimsy shanty- and shack-towns? And could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?" Wasn't it just last fall you canned Steve Phillips after a fling with an assistant turned into a <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/28/war_on_booty/index.html">tawdry debacle</a> of vengeance and TMI?</p><p>Perhaps it's little wonder, then, that when word got out yesterday you'd <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20100224/SPORTS18/2240342/1066/Sports18/No-pardon-ESPN-suspends-Kornheiser">suspended "Pardon the Interruption" host Tony Kornheiser</a> for two weeks after a few choice remarks about SportsCenter anchor Hannah Storm, our reaction was, "A stupidity outbreak at ESPN? Shut UP!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/24/espn_hannah_storm_foul/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/24/espn_hannah_storm_foul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://xfer.andomedia.com/triton/wtem/February_16_2010_The_Tony_Kornheiser_Show_Part_1-1266349267.mp3" length="1245" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiger Woods&#8217; superstar kabuki</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/tiger_kabuki/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/tiger_kabuki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/02/19/tiger_kabuki_and_espn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need fallen heroes to apologize to us so we don't have to think about how much their failures are like ours]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pre-apology hype inundated the sports networks. Even in the wee hours -- the Lonely Guy TV block of overnight "SportsCenter" repeats swollen with penis enlargement ads, Tiger taming ruled. ESPN gravely warned: "The media's appetite to learn more is not going to be exhausted." Strange the megacorp thinks itself an observer of, not a participant in, this circus. This is a shaming that everyone's a little ashamed to be a party to.</p><p>Deep into the night "SportsCenter" aired a brooding "Behind the Music"-style retrospective that blamed Tiger Woods for pretending to be a "model of propriety." Who knew that hawking razors (the kind that get you laid, if the woman ever stops fondling your face) made Tiger's adultery hypocritical? What was Woods preaching and was the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masters_Tournament">green jacket</a> part of Eldrick's ridiculous evangelical get-up?</p><p>This is the apotheosis of Sports Kabuki, a subconscious dance that keeps the good ol' American way from morphing into a Norman Rockwell painting of a man having sex with his Thanksgiving turkey. Once their humanity is discovered, athletes are shamed into a cringing renouncement of who they are, so we don't have to think about who we are. The folks at ESPN could be squeezing Woods because he's a driving, chipping, putting reminder of scandals at their own debauched network.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/tiger_kabuki/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/19/tiger_kabuki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erin Andrews: &#8220;I have nightmares&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/16/erin_andrews_stalker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/16/erin_andrews_stalker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/12/16/erin_andrews_stalker</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The voyeurism didn't end in the courtroom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leering, inappropriate attention -- it's not just for peepholes! When ESPN reporter Erin Andrews checked into a Columbus, Ohio hotel in Februrary of 2008, she did what many people do when they're alone in hotel rooms. She took off her clothes. Little did she know someone was on the other side of the wall, watching her, <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/07/23/andrews/index.html">filming her</a>, someone who would soon be posting what he saw on the Web. Someone who unbeknownst to Andrews had <a href="http://cbs2chicago.com/sports/Erin.Andrews.Arrest.2.1233476.html">requested</a> a room next to hers -- and had his request unblinkingly honored by the hotel. He then did it again. Yesterday, Michael David Barrett <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/othersports/2010516741_digs16.html">pleaded guilty</a> to interstate stalking, and will face up to five years in prison when he's sentenced in February. Also in that Los Angeles courtroom was Andrews herself, who told Judge Manuel Real, "I am a victim of this sexual predator. I would like to see him immediately put in prison for as long as possible."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/16/erin_andrews_stalker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/16/erin_andrews_stalker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sunday Night Baseball&#8221; loves Chachi</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/23/phillips_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/23/phillips_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/01/23/phillips</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESPN bringing Steve Phillips into the booth with Jon Miller and Joe Morgan is the oldest trick in TV land, and one of the worst.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN announced this week that Steve Phillips will join Jon Miller and Joe Morgan in the booth of "Sunday Night Baseball," the network's signature baseball telecast.</p><p>There had been <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/2008/10/25/2008-10-25_sources_say_espn_set_to_break_up_morganm.html">rumors</a> during the postseason, denied by ESPN, that the network was about to break up the 19-year pairing of Miller and Morgan.</p><p>Instead, the four-letter has turned to the oldest trick in the long-running TV series book: It's brought in <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/celebritology/2006/08/catching_up_with_robbie_rist.html">Cousin Oliver.</a></p><p>Phillips is the new kid, introduced to give a little goose to a program that's gone flat, that has -- if I may use a catchphrase that has MySpaced -- jumped the shark.</p><p>Steve Phillips is Seven on "Married ... With Children." He's Olivia on "The Cosby Show." He's Chachi.</p><p>I'm not sure the show needed freshening up -- I mean "Sunday Night Baseball," not "The Cosby Show." But I do know that Phillips is just the guy to not do it. The former New York Mets general manager has been with ESPN since 2004, working some games but mostly on the panel of "Baseball Tonight," where he's provided a steady stream of reasons for the other 29 teams not to hire him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/23/phillips_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/23/phillips_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BCS goes to &#8220;pay TV&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/18/bcs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/18/bcs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/11/18/bcs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long-feared apocalypse for sports fans, a major championship on cable, is just a routine business deal. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN confirmed Tuesday that it has secured rights to the Bowl Championship Series games from 2011 through 2014, making the BCS Championship Game the first major North American sports championship event -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/sports/col/kaufman/2004/11/29/monday/">such as it is</a> -- to jump from free to pay TV.</p><p>A whole generation of readers is wondering what the heck pay TV is. ESPN's free, isn't it? It's on basic cable. It's the rare viewer under 30, and maybe under 40, who thinks of ESPN or other cable networks that carry major-sport playoff games as being significantly different than CBS or NBC.</p><p>Doomsayers have been warning since the 1970s that someday, all the big sporting events would be on pay TV, which at the time meant cable. The doomsayers were pretty much right, but only because almost all TV is pay TV now.</p><p>Depending whose figures you want to use, something like 88 percent of U.S. households that have televisions pay for cable or satellite service. That leaves roughly 14 million households with sets hooked up to nothing more than an antenna for watching TV. But a <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/media/2008/pr_081015.html">Nielsen Company</a> survey last month found that nearly a quarter of those sets aren't being used to watch TV programming. They're hooked up to DVD and VCR players and video-game systems.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/11/18/bcs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/18/bcs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Morgan, stathead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/22/morgan_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/22/morgan_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/09/22/morgan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For just a moment, the old-school baseball man wanders over to the sabermetric side to talk about clutch hitting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/09/22/yankees/index.html">last game at Yankee Stadium</a> really seemed to stir up the emotions Sunday night. Or it stirred up something, anyway. Joe Morgan, who famously refuses to read "Moneyball" because he played the game so he doesn't need to, and who is generally known as an anti-sabermetric kind of guy, started talking like Bill James at one point. </p><p>Well, not really, but he sort of inadvertently made the classic sabermetric point that while <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/sports/col/kaufman/2005/03/10/thursday/index.html">clutch hitting</a> obviously exists, there's no such thing as the skill of clutch hitting. </p><p>I was excited to have Morgan on my side of the street, however fleetingly. And I mean that in the larger sense of doubting the conventional baseball wisdom. On the specific question of clutch hitting, I'm pretty much with the old school. I believe it exists as a skill, that the statheads just haven't figured out a good way to measure it yet. </p><p>Morgan takes a lot of heat as a kind of sabermetric whipping boy, but I like listening to him. I really enjoy his broadcasts with Jon Miller. I thought he was great Sunday stopping Reggie Jackson in the middle of Reggie trying to deflect some praise from himself onto lesser Yankees like Paul O'Neill and Tino Martinez. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/22/morgan_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/22/morgan_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic Yankee futility</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/22/yankees_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/22/yankees_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/09/22/yankees</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barely alive, New York is on the verge of elimination for the first straight year. Also: Stadium closing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Yankees staved off elimination Sunday night by beating the Baltimore Orioles 7-3 in New York. The win kept the Yankees barely alive in the American League wild-card race, trailing the Boston Red Sox by six and a half games. If the Yankees win their remaining six games and the Red Sox lose their last seven, they'll meet in a one-game playoff. </p><p>That almost certainly won't happen, and that means this is another year when the once great Yankees franchise has fallen short of the postseason. </p><p>It's another year without a championship for Derek Jeter, who at 34 has had a down season and may be in his decline phase. If the Yankees don't get things turned around soon Jeter may well retire with only four World Series titles and six pennants to his name. Has any player so great won so little? </p><p>Imagine you're Mariano Rivera. You're the greatest closer in history, yet you've never had a chance to pitch in a playoff game, except in 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/22/yankees_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/22/yankees_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocking press releases of our times</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/18/stadium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/18/stadium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/2008/09/18/stadium</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems ESPN will be paying a little bit of attention to the closing of Yankee Stadium.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Press release from ESPN here. The headline: </p><p>"ESPN to Chronicle Final Game from Yankee Stadium" </p><p>Really. Color me surprised. Up till now ESPN has been silent on the Yankee Stadium closing story for all of 200lastyearofyankeestadium. I mean 2008. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/18/stadium/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/18/stadium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rays-Red Sox: The day after</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/11/red_sox_rays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/11/red_sox_rays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/09/11/red_sox_rays</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pondering Tampa's momentum-changing (ha!), pennant race-affecting (ha!) win. Plus: ESPN's  Gammons and Co. confidently err on the rules.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few thoughts about Wednesday's game of the century, the Tampa Bay Rays' 4-2, 14-inning win over the Boston Red Sox at Fenway Park. The win was the second in a row for the Rays, giving them the series and restoring their lead in the American League East to two and a half games. </p><p>What had been a five and a half-game lead on the morning of Sept. 1 had shrunk to half a game after the Sox won the series opener Monday night. </p><p><b>1.</b> This was a big, fun September game, but not so much because of the pennant-race implications. As <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/sports/col/kaufman/2002/09/17/wild_card/">hobbyhorsed</a> in this space before, there really isn't much of a pennant race going on between the Sox and the Rays because, barring a total collapse, the second-place finisher will make the playoffs anyway as the wild card. </p><p>Now, the Rays had been looking pretty total collapsy before Tuesday's win, losing six out of seven, and that could still happen. But that would be a total collapse and wild-card race story, not a pennant-race story. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/11/red_sox_rays/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/11/red_sox_rays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESPN just shows the game</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/09/monday_72/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/09/monday_72/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/09/09/monday</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new, football-focused "Monday Night Football" delivers a delightfully sideline-reporter-free evening. And the hideous Raiders.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/03/AR2008090301940.html">made a lot of noise</a> just before the season about how it was going back to basics with "Monday Night Football." That meant kicking the celebrities out of the booth and focusing on the actual game, with a larger role for Ron Jaworski's terrific strategic analysis and a much smaller one for the sideline reporters. </p><p>Network poobahs told reporters that focus groups in several cities had told ESPN what they wanted to see on ESPN's football broadcasts. You'd better sit down because this might shock you. It evidently shocked ESPN. Viewers <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/sports/col/kaufman/2004/06/18/friday/">wanted to see the game.</a> </p><p>This is one of those good news stories. The season debut of "Monday Night Football," the Green Bay Packers' 24-19 home win over the Minnesota Vikings, was a delight. A sideline-reporter-free delight. </p><p>"Monday Night Football" had been employing not just one but two sideline reporters, Suzy Kolber and Michelle Tafoya, in its first two years on ESPN. That's an awful lot of "I talked to So-and-So's mom this week" reports and two sideline reporters too many, though both Tafoya and Kolber are excellent when they have worthwhile work to do. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/09/monday_72/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/09/monday_72/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESPN&#8217;s dishonest tap-dance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/25/espn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/25/espn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/06/25/espn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The network refuses to play it straight with Euro 2008 viewers about its announcers not being at the stadium.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN lost the video feed from Germany's 3-2 win over Turkey in a Euro 2008 semifinal on three different occasions Wednesday, and its response was less than straightforward. </p><p>Each time the picture went out -- the last was moments after Germany's Philip Lahm scored the game-winner in the 90th minute -- game announcers Derek Rae and Andy Gray quickly threw the broadcast back to the studio, where Rece Davis, Julie Foudy and Tommy Smyth tap-danced until the feed was restored. </p><p>Davis was quick to point out that the problem was lightning strikes in Switzerland, where the match was being played, and that broadcasters all over the world had lost the feed. </p><p>In other words: Don't blame ESPN! This isn't our fault! </p><p>Fair enough. But why didn't Rae and Gray stay on the air and describe the action, radio style? The answer was obvious if you were paying close attention when the video went black: The ambient sound went out too, though Rae and Gray could still be heard. They were sitting in a studio in Connecticut. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/06/25/espn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/25/espn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Home run, Daddy!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/16/cws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/16/cws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/2008/06/16/cws</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miami second baseman Jemile Weeks' dad provides the best call of the College World Series -- on a cellphone.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great moment on the College World Series broadcast on ESPN Monday afternoon: Miami second baseman Jemile Weeks, the younger brother of Milwaukee Brewers second baseman Ricky Weeks, was at-bat in the third inning of an elimination game against arch-rival Florida State, and ESPN focused on his dad, Richard Weeks, in the stands. </p><p>The elder Weeks was on a cellphone, describing the action to his father, Victor Weeks, who ESPN's announcing team said is legally blind. "That was a little outside, but he called a strike on him," he said after the 2-1 pitch. "Two-two count." </p><p>Jemile hit the next pitch over the right-field fence for a two-run homer and a 2-1 Miami lead. ESPN's camera caught Weeks high-fiving his neighbors and yelling into the phone: "Woooo! Home run! Home run, Dad! Home run, Daddy!" </p><p>"That," said color analyst Robin Ventura, "was the best home run call of the whole series." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/06/16/cws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/16/cws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MLB draft: Entertaining the wonks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/05/draft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/05/draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/06/05/draft</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's baseball nerd time on ESPN2, and this column's favorite amateur player now belongs to its favorite pro team.



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baseball's amateur draft, going on right now on ESPN2 as well as in real life in Orlando, Fla., is even more wonky TV viewing than the NFL draft. </p><p>At least non-obsessed football fans have heard of a few of the guys in the first two or three rounds of the NFL draft. You have to have your nose buried in <a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com">Baseball America,</a> which as a baseball wonk I recommend, to have even heard more than one or two names from the first round of the baseball draft. </p><p>I've heard the names of most of these guys, I've even seen a couple of the college players play on TV, but I don't know much about any of them except one, my favorite player in the draft, Buster Posey, who went at No. 5 to my favorite team, the San Francisco Giants. He's my favorite player not because of anything he's done on the field, though he's a nice player, an athletic catcher who can hit and even closes for Florida State, but because he's practically named after my kids, Buster and Daisy. </p><p>By the way, I just learned that a posey is not a type of flower, like a daisy. It just means any flower, or a bouquet of flowers. Now you know why I'm not writing a botany column. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/06/05/draft/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/05/draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King Kaufman&#8217;s Sports Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/07/friday_59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/07/friday_59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/col/kaufman/2008/03/07/friday</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chemistry Experiment 3: The Giants are happy and loose without Barry. Will that mean anything? Plus: ESPN's soap opera.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The San Francisco Giants, fresh from the long winter of Barry Bonds' discontent and enjoying an invigorating spring of freedom and equality, are fertile ground for a <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/sports/col/kaufman/2005/08/30/tuesday/">chemistry experiment.</a> </p><p>Much has been made of new center fielder Aaron Rowand's <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/spring2008/columns/story?columnist=crasnick_jerry&id=3254489">weekly team-building bowling outings</a> and Barry Zito's move into <a href="http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/23424678/">Bonds' old suite of four lockers</a> in the spring training clubhouse, parceling it up with Matt Cain. </p><p>The players and manager Bruce Bochy are talking about how <a href="http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/columnists/cs-080216-phil-rogers-barry-bonds,1,7773745.column">they're a team</a> now, with no more of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/15/sports/baseball/15giants.html">the old double standard,</a> about how they'll <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/sports/articles/0302cactussunday0302.html">have fun together</a> off the field and <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/sports/articles/0302cactussunday0302.html">scratch and claw together</a> on it, manufacturing runs and swaggering with warrior spirit, as noted on the matchy-matchy <a href="http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080213&content_id=2372749&vkey=spt2008news&fext=.jsp&c_id=sf">T-shirts they've been wearing.</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/07/friday_59/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/07/friday_59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

