<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s threat to a poor Silicon Valley city</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New America Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12325781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>EAST PALO ALTO, Calif. -- A baby blue billboard displaying a giant thumbs-up hand, the iconic Facebook “Like” symbol, stands on the corner of Willow Road and the 84 freeway, facing Menlo Park. It marks the entrance into the new campus of Facebook, the Internet giant that just recently filed for an IPO, minted a new crop of multimillionaires, and has just moved into this newer, bigger home – the former campus of Sun Microsystems.</p><p>The Like sign may just reflect the sentiments of the city of Menlo Park, a mostly affluent suburb that is sure to receive a windfall in taxes from the arrival of its new tenant, which has made the city the new center of Silicon Valley.</p><p>But the sign is also turned away from East Palo Alto, a neighboring low-income community of color adjacent to Menlo Park. That city will be the gateway to Facebook for many commuters and may be the future home of some of the 9,000-plus employees who are expected to work at the new location. And while the rest of the Valley celebrates the expansion of the new company that is redefining how the world communicates and uses technology, East Palo Alto residents say they see more of the same: another powerful Silicon Valley corporation that will benefit at the expense, and perhaps displacement, of their city.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s hypocritical breast-feeding controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12320111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week in Controversies We Can't Believe Are Still Happening: Facebook. Breast-feeding. Discuss.</p><p>Facebook, where you can create an entire album of your drunken, vomity, relieving-yourself<a href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=114645594627&amp;set=a.432262084627.239647.46205279627&amp;type=3&amp;theater">-into-a-sink </a>exploits, where you can share images of your child <a href="http://www.stfuparentsblog.com/post/2935973718/click-to-enlarge-poop-skating-please-take-a">happily sliding around in his own diarrhea,</a> has long maintained a surprisingly prim attitude toward the comparatively tame issue of breast-feeding shots. Though the company insists that "breastfeeding is natural and beautiful," and that "the vast majority of … photos are compliant with our policies, and we will not take action on them," it also maintains that "photos that show a fully exposed breast where the child is not actively engaged in nursing do violate Facebook's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities." Photos that are taken down, Facebook says, "are almost exclusively brought to our attention by other users who complain about them."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rise of Facebook Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/the_rise_of_facebook_nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/the_rise_of_facebook_nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10695471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When David Cameron became Britain’s prime minister, he made an appointment to talk to another head of state — Mark Zuckerberg. Yes, that Mark Zuckerberg: the billionaire wunderkind, the founder of Facebook. At the meeting at 10 Downing Street, Prime Minister Cameron and Facebook president Zuckerberg discussed ways in which social networks could take over certain governmental duties and inform public policymaking.</p><p>A month later, Zuckerberg and Cameron had a follow-up conversation, later posted on YouTube. Cameron, dressed in suit and tie, chatted with Zuckerberg, who wore a blue cotton T-shirt. “Basically, we’ve got a big problem here,” Cameron pointed out to Zuckerberg, describing the U.K.’s financial woes.</p><p>Zuckerberg outlined how Facebook could be used as a platform to decrease spending and increase public participation in the political process: “I mean  all these people have great ideas and a lot of energy that they want to bring, and I think for a lot of people it’s just about having an easy and a cheap way for them too to communicate  their ideas.”</p><p>“Brilliant,” Cameron said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/the_rise_of_facebook_nation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When David Cameron became Britain’s prime minister, he made an appointment to talk to another head of state — Mark Zuckerberg. Yes, that Mark Zuckerberg: the billionaire wunderkind, the founder of Facebook. At the meeting at 10 Downing Street, Prime Minister Cameron and Facebook president Zuckerberg discussed ways in which social networks could take over certain governmental duties and inform public policymaking.</p><p>A month later, Zuckerberg and Cameron had a follow-up conversation, later posted on YouTube. Cameron, dressed in suit and tie, chatted with Zuckerberg, who wore a blue cotton T-shirt. “Basically, we’ve got a big problem here,” Cameron pointed out to Zuckerberg, describing the U.K.’s financial woes.</p><p>Zuckerberg outlined how Facebook could be used as a platform to decrease spending and increase public participation in the political process: “I mean  all these people have great ideas and a lot of energy that they want to bring, and I think for a lot of people it’s just about having an easy and a cheap way for them too to communicate  their ideas.”</p><p>“Brilliant,” Cameron said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/the_rise_of_facebook_nation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/the_rise_of_facebook_nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why kids need solitude</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10809981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Demand for remedial instruction in colleges is on the rise. About 75 percent of New York City freshmen attending community college last year needed remedial math, reading or writing courses. The organization that administers the ACT found that only one in four of 2010 high school graduates who took the ACT exam were college-ready in four key subjects areas: English, math, reading and science. Statistics like these are startling, as they not only reveal serious flaws in our educational system, but also raise questions as to how these students will fare in the future if they are lacking the knowledge and critical skills needed to succeed in college and beyond.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demand for remedial instruction in colleges is on the rise. About 75 percent of New York City freshmen attending community college last year needed remedial math, reading or writing courses. The organization that administers the ACT found that only one in four of 2010 high school graduates who took the ACT exam were college-ready in four key subjects areas: English, math, reading and science. Statistics like these are startling, as they not only reveal serious flaws in our educational system, but also raise questions as to how these students will fare in the future if they are lacking the knowledge and critical skills needed to succeed in college and beyond.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Facebook save your life?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10353381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In September 2010, Rutgers freshman <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/gay_teen_suicide_cyberbullying/ ">Tyler Clementi posted on his Facebook page</a> that he was "Jumping off the gw bridge sorry" – and then did. Last Christmas, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1344281/Facebook-suicide-None-Simone-Backs-1-082-online-friends-helped-her.html?ito=feeds-newsxml">Simone Back wrote</a> that she "Took all my pills be dead soon so bye bye every one." Several Facebook "friends" added disparaging comments, but no one stepped forward to check on her. Black's body was found the next day. And last December, <a href="http://gawker.com/5713637/the-facebook-suicide-note-of-school-board-shooter-clay-duke">Clay Duke posted a Facebook "testament,"</a> writing that "Some people (the government sponsored media) will say I was evil, a monster … no…" He then went on a shooting rampage and killed himself.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/">http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I won&#8217;t Facebook friend my tween</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10171887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't want to be my 11-year-old daughter's friend. I don't just mean that in the traditional, "I'm not your friend; I'm your mom" sense. Because I am still not letting my firstborn get on Facebook, she might as well forget about me becoming her friend online any time soon.</p><p>Apparently I'm the minority here. Last week, <a href="http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3850/3075 ">a study of 1,007 parents </a>with children between 10 and 14 found that a stunning half of all parents of 12-year-olds -- and 20 percent of parents of 10-year-olds -- knew that their children were on Facebook. Amazingly, nearly 70 percent of those parents helped their children sign up. Facebook's terms of service prohibit users under the age of 13 from registering. The study certainly confirms what I've noticed over the past year: the increasing presence of my friends' children "liking" their statuses and LOLing their photos.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is my Facebook page a liberal echo chamber?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/is_my_facebook_page_a_liberal_echo_chamber/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/is_my_facebook_page_a_liberal_echo_chamber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10130688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago, for reasons I don’t quite understand, I thought it would be a good idea to become Facebook friends with some people I knew in high school. Nostalgic, bored, procrastinating, emotionally unguarded after wrestling the kids into bed, Facebook’s algorithmic magic produced these old classmates’ names and before I knew it, I’d reached out to them with a click.</p><p><em>Why?</em> I wondered almost immediately. These were people to whom I hadn’t spoken in more than 15 years, people I hadn’t much liked at the time, people with whom I’d had little in common besides geographic proximity and attendance at the same underperforming high school in central Virginia. I regretted it instantly, but tried not to worry. After all, I’m Facebook friends with plenty of people I don’t know well or like much, second cousins in south Florida, random playgroup moms, people I’ve met on planes or at Starbucks. What did it really matter -- having a few more virtual strangers in my life. That was what I thought. Then, a day or two later, I read one of their posts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/is_my_facebook_page_a_liberal_echo_chamber/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago, for reasons I don’t quite understand, I thought it would be a good idea to become Facebook friends with some people I knew in high school. Nostalgic, bored, procrastinating, emotionally unguarded after wrestling the kids into bed, Facebook’s algorithmic magic produced these old classmates’ names and before I knew it, I’d reached out to them with a click.</p><p><em>Why?</em> I wondered almost immediately. These were people to whom I hadn’t spoken in more than 15 years, people I hadn’t much liked at the time, people with whom I’d had little in common besides geographic proximity and attendance at the same underperforming high school in central Virginia. I regretted it instantly, but tried not to worry. After all, I’m Facebook friends with plenty of people I don’t know well or like much, second cousins in south Florida, random playgroup moms, people I’ve met on planes or at Starbucks. What did it really matter &#8212; having a few more virtual strangers in my life. That was what I thought. Then, a day or two later, I read one of their posts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/is_my_facebook_page_a_liberal_echo_chamber/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/is_my_facebook_page_a_liberal_echo_chamber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>147</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The tribesman who Facebook friended me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/the_tribesman_who_facebook_friended_me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/the_tribesman_who_facebook_friended_me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10108053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ping!  The other day, I got a Facebook friend request in my in box.  This is now a relatively rare occurrence – I’m long past the frenzy of those first few Facebook months when friend-finding was more satisfying and addictive than chocolate, and I’m done gorging myself on it all.  But, intrigued, I opened it up, to find that this was no ordinary future friend (from the past) – it was a man I’d met while making a film about a tribe from the Sepik Valley in Papua New Guinea. It was a man who was born and raised in a remote hunter-gatherer society, where, to this day, the women spend their time searching out wild sago palms in the swamps to pulp into flour for pancakes, and the men hunt monstrous saltwater crocodiles in tea-colored jungle rivers at night with nothing more than spears. My new Facebook friend no longer joins these hunts – he’s an elder and has managed to find some income in the embryonic Sepik tourist industry – but for many years he <em>was</em> a hunter-gatherer, and now he’s on Facebook!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/the_tribesman_who_facebook_friended_me/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ping!  The other day, I got a Facebook friend request in my in box.  This is now a relatively rare occurrence – I’m long past the frenzy of those first few Facebook months when friend-finding was more satisfying and addictive than chocolate, and I’m done gorging myself on it all.  But, intrigued, I opened it up, to find that this was no ordinary future friend (from the past) – it was a man I’d met while making a film about a tribe from the Sepik Valley in Papua New Guinea. It was a man who was born and raised in a remote hunter-gatherer society, where, to this day, the women spend their time searching out wild sago palms in the swamps to pulp into flour for pancakes, and the men hunt monstrous saltwater crocodiles in tea-colored jungle rivers at night with nothing more than spears. My new Facebook friend no longer joins these hunts – he’s an elder and has managed to find some income in the embryonic Sepik tourist industry – but for many years he <em>was</em> a hunter-gatherer, and now he’s on Facebook!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/the_tribesman_who_facebook_friended_me/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/the_tribesman_who_facebook_friended_me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When mourning goes viral</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Soon after news of Steve Jobs’ death emerged Wednesday, millions of hashtags, posts and YouTube videos erupted on Facebook and Twitter to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/06/technology/jobss-death-prompts-grief-and-tributes.html">memorialize his life and express sadness</a> for the loss of a technology visionary. Twitter alone was overrun with <a href="http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/07/8206489-25-million-tweets-on-steve-jobs-in-12-hours-after-death">2.5 million tweets</a> about Jobs in the 12 hours after he died. As someone who revolutionized the digital world, it seems eminently appropriate that mourners took their grieving online -- especially since social media has, in many ways, helped reinvent the way we approach death in modern society.</p><p>First, it gives people who have something to say an unprecedented audience that’s both instantaneous and quintessentially democratic. The eulogy is no longer the preserve of the great and the good. Online, anyone can be a broadcaster, a commentator or a curator of news and information.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/">http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s enraging status update</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like, oh, around 750 million other users of Facebook, I logged on to the world's biggest social media network this morning and was immediately annoyed. Facebook had changed its user interface, <em>again.</em> Gone was the "Most Recent" button, which allowed users to see what their friends have posted in a simple, straightforward, chronological order. Now Facebook was indulging, <em>again,</em> in outright effrontery: employing its own secret algorithmic sauce to highlight what it considered the most important "top stories," while mixing in other recent posts far below.</p><p>Facebook also added a "Ticker" at the top right hand side of the page, which provided a real-time Twitter-like stream of status updates from all my friends. When I first checked it, it was packed with complaints about the new interface change. Judging solely from comments from <em>my</em> friends, people don't want Facebook deciding what's most important, Facebook's suggestions were wrong, irrelevant and insulting, and why oh why oh why can't Facebook leave a good thing alone?</p><p>Oh, and people hate change. And, goddammit, they're switching to Google+ (which conveniently opened its doors to the general public today), or Twitter, or giving up on the Internet altogether.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/">http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When my one-night stand returned on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/08/30/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Remember me?"</p><p>Two innocuous words on their own, but unsettling when read in a computer screen subject line, sent from a former lover. Of course, I remembered him. In the era before email and text messages, when physical interaction was the most direct form of communication, he caught my waist as I moved across a room. He caught my waist and whispered, "You are so hot."</p><p>It was John Edwards' undoing, and it was mine.</p><p>When I received his Facebook message 13 years later, it shook me. I read two words, but I remembered an entire essay of details. His tan body, the lingering scent of cologne on my pillowcase, Sarah McLachlan on repeat, a cream-colored sweater, and waves breaking along the surf.</p><p>"Now there's a name I haven't heard in a million lifetimes," I typed. As an afterthought, I added, "How are you?" but it seemed inadequate.</p><p>We shared a night backlit by the glow of a South Carolina moon. There was an early morning sunrise, too. He was headed to California for a career in law enforcement, and I was preparing for social work in Ohio.</p><p>If it had been a Hollywood movie, he would have stayed. Or I would have gone with him. Or we would have agreed to meet a year later on the top of the Empire State Building. At the very least, I would have given him my telephone number.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Torn: This week in cultural ambivalence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Torn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coen Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Night Lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Fish gotta swim, birds gotta fly, and I have to make sure that I have no idea what is going on with <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/2012_elections/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/08/11/gop_debate_iowa">those Republican debates</a>. Is Michele Bachmann winning? Is that why <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist/index.html">her scary face was on Newsweek</a>? Oh man, what a world, what a world. Oh, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/09/london_riots_explained">London burned down too</a>! Come on, Earth, get it together!</p><p>If you've had enough of the depressing news for the week, feast those things in your ocular cavities on these 10 pop culture stories that we've culled from the Internet and beyond! (But mostly the Internet.) They aren't here to make you feel OK again, but maybe they'll take your mind off the fact that the world is going to hell in a hand basket.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What we lose when we lose anonymity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/death_of_internet_anonymity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/death_of_internet_anonymity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/2011/08/12/death_of_internet_anonymity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From warrantless wiretapping to ever-present surveillance cameras, our world is right now in the midst of a long war on anonymity.</p><p>In the media and political arenas, we've seen paparazzi culture famously fetishize the outing of anonymous iconoclasts, from Watergate's Deep Throat (Mark Felt) to a top CIA agent working on weapons of mass destruction (Valerie Plame). Likewise, in our communities, we now know that we are almost always being monitored in highly trafficked parks, malls, airports and stadiums -- and as Slate recently reported, we may soon have apps on all of our smartphones that let us identify random faces in a crowd.</p><p>Teeming with incognito bloggers and commenters, the Internet seemed to be the last bulwark against this trend -- a rare public space that let us broadcast opinions from the shadows. But even cyberspace will likely be exposed to the white-hot spotlight of identity, as a new campaign for disclosure now starts in earnest.</p><p>Launched in response to cyber-bullying, this campaign made headlines last month when Facebook executive Randi Zuckerberg declared that "anonymity on the Internet has to go away." Her statement echoed that of former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who previously called for "true transparency and no anonymity" on the Web.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/death_of_internet_anonymity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/death_of_internet_anonymity/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/death_of_internet_anonymity/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/death_of_internet_anonymity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/death_of_internet_anonymity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is China really going after Facebook?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/china_facebook_buyout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/china_facebook_buyout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/01/china_facebook_buyout</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK -- Sometime in early 2013, if current trends hold steady, the number of Facebook users worldwide should exceed the population of China.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img class='wp-image-10058241' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/08/ID_globalPostInline5.gif' /></a> Call it a coincidence, but now it seems China wants a piece of the action.</p><p>Last month, analysts who monitor China's gargantuan sovereign wealth fund detected signs that a deal was in the works to buy a huge stake in Facebook. Neve rmind that access to Facebook has been blocked in China since 2009.</p><p>The fund, known as the China Investment Corporation (CIC), is a $332 billion portfolio that seeks to earn money from the government's massive export earnings. It operates in almost complete secrecy, as do many sovereign wealth funds in the Persian Gulf, Russia and elsewhere. These have grown into major economic players over the past 20 years.</p><p>But a number of high-profile investment websites have quoted "inside sources" describing efforts by Citibank to secure for China a stake in Facebook large enough "to matter," according to Business Insider. Citibank, incidentally, is undertaking a major expansion in China.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/china_facebook_buyout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK &#8212; Sometime in early 2013, if current trends hold steady, the number of Facebook users worldwide should exceed the population of China.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img class='wp-image-10058241' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/08/ID_globalPostInline5.gif' /></a> Call it a coincidence, but now it seems China wants a piece of the action.</p><p>Last month, analysts who monitor China&#8217;s gargantuan sovereign wealth fund detected signs that a deal was in the works to buy a huge stake in Facebook. Neve rmind that access to Facebook has been blocked in China since 2009.</p><p>The fund, known as the China Investment Corporation (CIC), is a $332 billion portfolio that seeks to earn money from the government&#8217;s massive export earnings. It operates in almost complete secrecy, as do many sovereign wealth funds in the Persian Gulf, Russia and elsewhere. These have grown into major economic players over the past 20 years.</p><p>But a number of high-profile investment websites have quoted &#8220;inside sources&#8221; describing efforts by Citibank to secure for China a stake in Facebook large enough &#8220;to matter,&#8221; according to Business Insider. Citibank, incidentally, is undertaking a major expansion in China.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/china_facebook_buyout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/01/china_facebook_buyout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous hackers to launch mystery social network</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/anonymous_plus_google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/anonymous_plus_google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/07/18/anonymous_plus_google</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The faceless hive-mind Anonymous, responsible for attacks on some of the world's preeminent companies, has now set its sights on the Internet's biggest name: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/faster-forward/post/anonymous-shunned-by-google-plus-to-launch-its-own-network/2011/07/18/gIQAstfuLI_blog.html">Google</a>. And its strategy takes a left turn from its modus operandi, branching the group into territory traditionally reserved for enterprising Silicon Valley start-ups.</p><p>Here's the story:&#160;Over the weekend, several Anonymous members were banished from the Mountain View search giant's buzzy new social network, Google+, apparently because content they hosted on their accounts violated the service's community standards. You might expect that the Web marauders -- responsible as they have been for high-profile hacks of <a href="http://techland.time.com/2011/06/10/anonymous-warns-nato-this-is-not-your-world/">Visa, Amazon, Pay Pal</a>&#160;and, most recently, the <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/booz/">U.S. military</a> -- would retaliate with a full-out assault on Google. That isn't the case, though. Instead, they've decided to fight fire with fire. They're aligning with another organization called <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/faster-forward/post/anonymous-shunned-by-google-plus-to-launch-its-own-network/2011/07/18/gIQAstfuLI_blog.html">Presstorm</a> to start their own social network:&#160;<a href="http://anonplus.com/">AnonPlus</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/anonymous_plus_google/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The faceless hive-mind Anonymous, responsible for attacks on some of the world&#8217;s preeminent companies, has now set its sights on the Internet&#8217;s biggest name: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/faster-forward/post/anonymous-shunned-by-google-plus-to-launch-its-own-network/2011/07/18/gIQAstfuLI_blog.html">Google</a>. And its strategy takes a left turn from its modus operandi, branching the group into territory traditionally reserved for enterprising Silicon Valley start-ups.</p><p>Here&#8217;s the story:&#160;Over the weekend, several Anonymous members were banished from the Mountain View search giant&#8217;s buzzy new social network, Google+, apparently because content they hosted on their accounts violated the service&#8217;s community standards. You might expect that the Web marauders &#8212; responsible as they have been for high-profile hacks of <a href="http://techland.time.com/2011/06/10/anonymous-warns-nato-this-is-not-your-world/">Visa, Amazon, Pay Pal</a>&#160;and, most recently, the <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/booz/">U.S. military</a> &#8212; would retaliate with a full-out assault on Google. That isn&#8217;t the case, though. Instead, they&#8217;ve decided to fight fire with fire. They&#8217;re aligning with another organization called <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/faster-forward/post/anonymous-shunned-by-google-plus-to-launch-its-own-network/2011/07/18/gIQAstfuLI_blog.html">Presstorm</a> to start their own social network:&#160;<a href="http://anonplus.com/">AnonPlus</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/anonymous_plus_google/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/anonymous_plus_google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Once bitten: Charlie Sheen&#8217;s death rumor still a computer virus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/charlie_sheen_web_virus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/charlie_sheen_web_virus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/13/charlie_sheen_web_virus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Sheen: the gift that keeps on giving. Sadly, herpes is no longer the only virus you can catch from the former "Two and a Half Men" actor: Now even reading about him can lead to an infection. You won't need penicillin, but this nasty computer bug uses your Facebook account to perpetuate itself and potentially install malware onto your hard drive. And this isn't even the first time <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2011/03/charlie-sheen-death-hoax-spreads-malware-through-facebook/1">this scam has worked</a> or <a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b218336_hoaxing_101_how_fake_celebrity_death.html">a Charlie Sheen death hoax has gone around</a>.</p><p>How did this happen? Early today, <a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b251994_true_false_charlie_sheen_dead.html">stories began popping up on Twitter and other social-networking sites</a> hinting at the actor's demise, with links promising "breaking news" on the event. To be fair, considering where we left the warlock, it wouldn't be unreasonable to wonder whether his winning luck had run out.</p><p>Fortunately for Sheen, he's not dead. He's just been taking a really long nap, according to a <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/charliesheen/status/91088084027965440">recent tweet</a> from the actor's account.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/charlie_sheen_web_virus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/charlie_sheen_web_virus/">http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/charlie_sheen_web_virus/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/charlie_sheen_web_virus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/charlie_sheen_web_virus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google+ shuts down invites &#8230; for now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, Google opened up its doors for users to try out Google+, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/social_media/?story=/tech/feature/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity">a new social networking platform</a> available to those smart enough to find the tiny red button on their homepage. Since Wednesday night, those with a Google+ invite were allowed to share the invitation with several of their friends. By this morning, all invitations had been put on hiatus, due to an "insane demand" and Google's "need to do this carefully, and in a controlled way," <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2011/06/google-invites-halted-due-to-insane-demand.html">according to social networking overseer Vic Gundotra</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Google+ does better than Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Way back when I joined Facebook I was under the impression that it was the social network where people play themselves. On Facebook, you were supposed to be "real." So I figured: OK, this is where I don't friend everyone indiscriminately; this is where I only connect with people I really know.</p><p>I stuck with that for a little while. But there were two big problems.</p><p>First, I was bombarded with friend requests from people I barely knew or didn't know at all. Why? It soon became clear that large numbers of people weren't approaching Facebook with the reality principle in mind. They were playing the usual online game of racking up big numbers to feel important. "Friend count" was the new "unique visitors."</p><p>Then Facebook started to get massive. And consultants and authors started giving us advice about how to use Facebook to brand ourselves. And marketing people began advocating that we use Facebook to sell stuff and, in fact, sell ourselves.</p><p>So which was Facebook: a new space for authentic communication between real people -- or a new arena for self-promotion?</p><p>I could probably have handled this existential dilemma. And I know it's one that a lot of people simply don't care about. It bugged me, but it was the other Facebook problem that made me not want to use the service at all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back when I joined Facebook I was under the impression that it was the social network where people play themselves. On Facebook, you were supposed to be &#8220;real.&#8221; So I figured: OK, this is where I don&#8217;t friend everyone indiscriminately; this is where I only connect with people I really know.</p><p>I stuck with that for a little while. But there were two big problems.</p><p>First, I was bombarded with friend requests from people I barely knew or didn&#8217;t know at all. Why? It soon became clear that large numbers of people weren&#8217;t approaching Facebook with the reality principle in mind. They were playing the usual online game of racking up big numbers to feel important. &#8220;Friend count&#8221; was the new &#8220;unique visitors.&#8221;</p><p>Then Facebook started to get massive. And consultants and authors started giving us advice about how to use Facebook to brand ourselves. And marketing people began advocating that we use Facebook to sell stuff and, in fact, sell ourselves.</p><p>So which was Facebook: a new space for authentic communication between real people &#8212; or a new arena for self-promotion?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the buzz on Google+?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/29/google_plus_buzz</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After three failed attempts at starting its own social media tool (including the much-maligned and privacy-challenged <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/warning-google-buzz-has-a-huge-privacy-flaw-2010-2">Google Buzz</a>), Google has launched one more, ambitious effort to steal Facebook's thunder: Google+. The new service, now in test trials and available to a limited number of Google users, boasts some intriguing features that have the blogosphere a-buzzing, including Circles, which lets users choose exactly which groups of friends they want to communicate with; and Stream, an analogue to the Facebook "News Feed"; and Sparks, a social-ized Google News.&#160;Most notable, however, is that Google will bill the tool as an alternative for <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/06/google-facebook-privacy/">Facebook-wary consumers</a> who worry about that network's use of personal data.&#160;</p><p>Opinions on the service run the gamut. Here's a look at key early reaction:</p><p>The New York Times' <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/29/technology/29google.html">Claire Cain Miller</a> notes that Google's difficulties in the realm of social media have already taken a toll on its status as "entry point" to the Internet, and wonders if Google+ can really help make up for lost time:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After three failed attempts at starting its own social media tool (including the much-maligned and privacy-challenged <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/warning-google-buzz-has-a-huge-privacy-flaw-2010-2">Google Buzz</a>), Google has launched one more, ambitious effort to steal Facebook&#8217;s thunder: Google+. The new service, now in test trials and available to a limited number of Google users, boasts some intriguing features that have the blogosphere a-buzzing, including Circles, which lets users choose exactly which groups of friends they want to communicate with; and Stream, an analogue to the Facebook &#8220;News Feed&#8221;; and Sparks, a social-ized Google News.&#160;Most notable, however, is that Google will bill the tool as an alternative for <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/06/google-facebook-privacy/">Facebook-wary consumers</a> who worry about that network&#8217;s use of personal data.&#160;</p><p>Opinions on the service run the gamut. Here&#8217;s a look at key early reaction:</p><p>The New York Times&#8217; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/29/technology/29google.html">Claire Cain Miller</a> notes that Google&#8217;s difficulties in the realm of social media have already taken a toll on its status as &#8220;entry point&#8221; to the Internet, and wonders if Google+ can really help make up for lost time:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Torn: 10 pieces of cultural ambivalence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Torn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackass 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate and William: The Royal Wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While this may seem like the week of <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/22/cee_lo_green_antigay_tweets">awkwardness and homophobia</a> (sadly, it's also Pride Week), we can't forget about all the great Holocaust and Hitler references used by celebs recently, or the surge in rehab stories <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/twitter/?story=/ent/tv/feature/2011/06/23/roger_ebert_death_threats_trolls">following Ryan Dunn's death</a>. Great job, everyone.</p><p><strong>1. Justin Bieber and Tiffani Thiessen have a creepy crush on each other:</strong> As evidenced by the shirts the two wore to <a href="http://www.accesshollywood.com/justin-bieber-and-tiffani-thiessens-dueling-t-shirt-love-fest_article_49816">Canada's MuchMusic Video Awards</a>, bearing each other's faces. Bieber was born one year after "Saved by the Bell" went off the air.</p><p><strong>2. James Blunt's blunder:</strong> Put a photo of himself on Facebook in front of a historical building near Auschwitz, then claimed it was his "<a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150657005775424&amp;set=a.10150257523845424.487440.16855985423&amp;type=1&amp;comments">hotel in Poland.</a>"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/25/pop_torn_james_blunt_auschwitz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

