<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Private equity&#8217;s evil twin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/private_equitys_evil_twin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/private_equitys_evil_twin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bain Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Facebook IPO debacle exposed venture capital as just as problematic as the industry that gave us Romney]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A funny thing happened on the way to the Facebook IPO. The clash of competing economic ideologies at play in the 2012 presidential campaign got a lot more complicated.</p><p>With our first-ever private equity honcho running for president in an era of high unemployment and slow economic growth, it was always a foregone conclusion that this year's election campaign would include an appraisal of whether Mitt Romney's version of capitalism is good for America. It's a debate the culture has been passionately engaged in at least as far back as Oliver Stone's "Wall Street," and the battle lines are well-drawn. Is Bain Capital a parasitic corporate raider or an engine for lean-and-mean capitalist renewal? You get to make the call, and then you can go vote.</p><p>Facebook's botched IPO adds a new wrinkle. In contrast to Bain-style private equity wheeling-and-dealing, the Silicon Valley venture capital model for new firm creation has always enjoyed a much more positive public relations profile. Maybe it's a West Coast vs. East Coast thing, but conjuring up the likes of Intel or Apple or Google from thin air is a lot more sexy than swooping down on a troubled firm, brutally slashing costs and stripping assets, and then reselling for a huge profit a few years down the line.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/private_equitys_evil_twin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/private_equitys_evil_twin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall St. ruins Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/wall_st_ruins_facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/wall_st_ruins_facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social network's debacle of a public offering exposes, once again, the rotten heart of finance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could there be a bigger public relations debacle for an aspiring technology colossus than the Facebook IPO? It's bad enough when the stock price doesn't "pop" <em>at all</em> on the first day of trading, but it gets a lot worse when the financial press spends the following week debating whether the machinations behind the scenes leading up to <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/facebook-i-p-o-raises-regulatory-concerns/?hp">the botched public offering</a> constitute outright <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/47534714">evidence of securities fraud</a> or merely a toxic mixture of greed and incompetence.</p><p>Here's what we know: Sometime in the run-up to the IPO, Facebook realized that it needed to downgrade its revenue projections for the second quarter because of difficulties selling ads on mobile phones -- which are increasingly the access point of choice for Facebook browsing. This news was buried deep in an SEC regulatory filing, but it also may have been communicated directly to Facebook's underwriters who, in turn, may have told their big clients -- the institutional investors who usually make out like bandits on IPO day by buying stock at the offering price and then selling on the pop. The big investors accordingly decided that the price was a little too high and dumped their stock as quickly as they could. Thus: no pop. The closing price was essentially the same as the opening price, and that wasn't supposed to happen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/wall_st_ruins_facebook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/wall_st_ruins_facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the school is the bully</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/when_the_school_is_the_bully/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/when_the_school_is_the_bully/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A middle-school family gets a lesson in Facebook privacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a world that still asks women if they're <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/why_times_cover_shocks/singleton/">"mom enough"</a> and debates <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_nyts_ridiculous_motherhood_debate/">our "obsession"</a> with our children, Pam Broviak this week showed us what an awesome mom looks like.</p><p>Last fall, Broviak says, her 13-year-old daughter's suburban Chicago school forced her to let them access her Facebook account and scour her private information, a policy Broviak says is commonplace in the Geneva Middle School South. In a blog post in April, Broviak added that when the incident happened, <a href="http://www.publicworksgroup.com/blog/2012/04/public-schools-coercing-kids-to-share-facebook-details/">"the vice principal called me to demand I come to the school immediately to read through [my daughter's] private messages." </a></p><p>Broviak told MSNBC Friday, "What a violation of my daughter's privacy this whole episode was," adding that the experience took "a huge toll on my daughter, who ended up crying through most of the rest of the day and therefore missed most of her classes. She was embarrassed and very upset." She says when she confronted the school about the issue, they told her it was routine policy to investigate students' social networking pages and cellphones.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/when_the_school_is_the_bully/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/when_the_school_is_the_bully/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Facebook grows, millions say, &#8216;no, thanks&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the resisters -- people who, unbelievably, don't want or need Facebook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — Don't try to friend MaLi Arwood on Facebook. You won't find her there.</p><p>You won't find Thomas Chin, either. Or Kariann Goldschmitt. Or Jake Edelstein.</p><p>More than 900 million people worldwide check their Facebook accounts at least once a month, but millions more are Facebook holdouts.</p><p>They say they don't want Facebook. They insist they don't need Facebook. They say they're living life just fine without the long-forgotten acquaintances that the world's largest social network sometimes resurrects.</p><p>They are the resisters.</p><p>"I'm absolutely in touch with everyone in my life that I want to be in touch with," Arwood says. "I don't need to share triviality with someone that I might have known for six months 12 years ago."</p><p>Even without people like Arwood, Facebook is one of the biggest business success stories in history. The site had 1 million users by the end of 2004, the year Mark Zuckerberg started it in his Harvard dorm room. Two years later, it had 12 million. Facebook had 500 million by summer 2010 and 901 million as of March 31, according to the company.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama goes viral, wins Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_goes_viral_wins_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_goes_viral_wins_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's endorsement of gay marriage becomes a cleverly -- and intensely -- choreographed meme]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Barack Obama blew America's mind by declaring his support for same-sex marriage Wednesday, he explained that his views on the subject had long been<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/e_3/"> "evolving."</a> But while evolution is a process that can take millennia, social media moves with considerably more swiftness. However long it took the White House (nudged though it was by Joe Biden's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/the_unlikely_liberal_hero/">Sunday blurt</a> that he was "absolutely comfortable" with marriage equality) to get to that place, it took no time at all for Obama's sentiments to become a meme.</p><p>It's no accident that the president's change of heart happened to make for a perfect sound bite. Nearly as fast as Barack Obama, leader of the free world, could utter the words "Same-sex couples should be able to get married," to ABC News correspondent Robin Roberts, @barackobama -- the president's not-nearly-as-popular-as@JustinBieber Twitter account -- was announcing <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/BarackObama/status/200303635895296000">"Same-sex couples should be able to get married."</a> As of Thursday morning, it had been <a href="http://retweetingobama.com/">retweeted over 56,000 times and counting.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_goes_viral_wins_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_goes_viral_wins_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Her breakup, my heartbreak</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/her_breakup_my_heartbreak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/her_breakup_my_heartbreak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12738161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My daughter was so mature when her boyfriend ended things. Why was I the one freaking out?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no way I was going to cry over his text. We barely knew each other. These long-distance things hardly ever work out anyway.</p><p>“I’m not sure how I feel about you anymore,” he wrote.</p><p>How could this be? A week earlier, he professed his love. He wanted to change his Facebook status to “in a relationship.” How did it go so wrong so fast?</p><p>More curiously, why was I feeling devastated by my 14-year-old daughter’s first breakup when she seemed unscathed by it? Katie replied to her new ex that these things happen and there were no hard feelings. I couldn’t move on so quickly.</p><p>“He’s not sure how he feels about <em>you?!</em>” I shouted. “You are smart, beautiful and kind. For God’s sake, you play piano for old folks at nursing homes and knit hats to support children in Africa! You’re borderline perfect. What’s he not sure of?”</p><p>Katie told me to take a deep breath. It would all be fine, she assured me. She explained that John was a nice guy whom she enjoyed getting to know, but ultimately they had very different interests. They lived on different coasts. It could never work.</p><p>“But … he was so cute,” I said, pouting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/her_breakup_my_heartbreak/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/her_breakup_my_heartbreak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t ignore Facebook&#8217;s silly-sounding policies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/dont_ignore_facebooks_silly_sounding_policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/dont_ignore_facebooks_silly_sounding_policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12406051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A leaked manual reveals the shadowy and powerful role social media sites play in shaping public discourse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, <a href="http://gawker.com/5885714/">Gawker received a curious document</a>. Turned over by an aggrieved worker from the online freelance employment site oDesk, the document iterated, over the course of several pages and in unsettling detail, exactly what kinds of content should be deleted from the social networking site that had outsourced its content moderation to oDesk’s team. The social networking site, as it turned out, was Facebook.</p><p>The antiseptically titled “Abuse Standards 6.1: Operation Manual for Live Content Moderators” (along with an updated version 6.2 subsequently shared with <a href="http://gawker.com/5885836/">Gawker</a>, presumably by Facebook) is still available on Gawker. It represents the implementation of the Facebook’s <a href="http://www.facebook.com/communitystandards">Community Standards</a>, which present the social media site's priorities around acceptable content, but stay miles away from actually spelling them out. In the Community Standards, Facebook reminds users that “We have a strict ‘no nudity or pornography’ policy. Any content that is inappropriately sexual will be removed. Before posting questionable content, be mindful of the consequences for you and your environment.” But, an oDesk freelancer looking at hundreds of pieces of content every hour needs more specific instructions on what exactly is “inappropriately sexual” — such as removing “Any OBVIOUS sexual activity, even if naked parts are hidden from view by hands, clothes or other objects. Cartoons / art included. Foreplay allowed (Kissing, groping, etc.). even for same sex (man-man / woman-woman" (sic).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/dont_ignore_facebooks_silly_sounding_policies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/dont_ignore_facebooks_silly_sounding_policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Facebook angst</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/18/my_facebook_angst/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/18/my_facebook_angst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12372991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social network site kicks up so much anxiety and embarrassment for me. But that doesn't mean I want to quit it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, my friend Elizabeth posted an item to Facebook. I wanted to comment but held back, though not exactly because I had plenty of work to do. Instead I sent her a text: “Sometimes do you want to say something or post something or like something on FB, but then you think of all those unanswered emails and texts and silence yourself, so people won’t see you ‘wasting’ time when you could be responding to them?”</p><p>“Sometimes?” she replied.</p><p>“It’s called Twilt, that feeling,” I answered, laughing, having coined the term on the spot.</p><p><strong>Twilt</strong> <em>(n):</em> the particular brand of guilt or self-reproach that results from posting, liking or commenting on items on Facebook or Twitter while simultaneously not responding to emails, text messages, phone calls or other types of personal communication with the knowledge or anxiety that the specific message senders will notice your public offerings and question your lack of private ones. Twilt, while related, is not the same as the guilt that results from general Internet-specific procrastination such as browsing blogs or online shopping, which, though it may result in its own brand of self-disgust, generally has no public shame component.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/18/my_facebook_angst/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/18/my_facebook_angst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s threat to a poor Silicon Valley city</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New America Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12325781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the social media giant opens a new campus nearby, East Palo Alto residents fear for their community's future]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EAST PALO ALTO, Calif. -- A baby blue billboard displaying a giant thumbs-up hand, the iconic Facebook “Like” symbol, stands on the corner of Willow Road and the 84 freeway, facing Menlo Park. It marks the entrance into the new campus of Facebook, the Internet giant that just recently filed for an IPO, minted a new crop of multimillionaires, and has just moved into this newer, bigger home – the former campus of Sun Microsystems.</p><p>The Like sign may just reflect the sentiments of the city of Menlo Park, a mostly affluent suburb that is sure to receive a windfall in taxes from the arrival of its new tenant, which has made the city the new center of Silicon Valley.</p><p>But the sign is also turned away from East Palo Alto, a neighboring low-income community of color adjacent to Menlo Park. That city will be the gateway to Facebook for many commuters and may be the future home of some of the 9,000-plus employees who are expected to work at the new location. And while the rest of the Valley celebrates the expansion of the new company that is redefining how the world communicates and uses technology, East Palo Alto residents say they see more of the same: another powerful Silicon Valley corporation that will benefit at the expense, and perhaps displacement, of their city.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/facebooks_threat_to_a_poor_silicon_valley_city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s hypocritical breast-feeding controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12320111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social media giant can't figure out what defines a dirty picture -- or the difference between biology and porn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week in Controversies We Can't Believe Are Still Happening: Facebook. Breast-feeding. Discuss.</p><p>Facebook, where you can create an entire album of your drunken, vomity, relieving-yourself<a href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=114645594627&amp;set=a.432262084627.239647.46205279627&amp;type=3&amp;theater">-into-a-sink </a>exploits, where you can share images of your child <a href="http://www.stfuparentsblog.com/post/2935973718/click-to-enlarge-poop-skating-please-take-a">happily sliding around in his own diarrhea,</a> has long maintained a surprisingly prim attitude toward the comparatively tame issue of breast-feeding shots. Though the company insists that "breastfeeding is natural and beautiful," and that "the vast majority of … photos are compliant with our policies, and we will not take action on them," it also maintains that "photos that show a fully exposed breast where the child is not actively engaged in nursing do violate Facebook's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities." Photos that are taken down, Facebook says, "are almost exclusively brought to our attention by other users who complain about them."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/facebooks_hypocritcal_breastfeeding_controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rise of Facebook Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/the_rise_of_facebook_nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/the_rise_of_facebook_nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10695471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social network has become as big and powerful as a country -- and it's time its citizens got a constitution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When David Cameron became Britain’s prime minister, he made an appointment to talk to another head of state — Mark Zuckerberg. Yes, that Mark Zuckerberg: the billionaire wunderkind, the founder of Facebook. At the meeting at 10 Downing Street, Prime Minister Cameron and Facebook president Zuckerberg discussed ways in which social networks could take over certain governmental duties and inform public policymaking.</p><p>A month later, Zuckerberg and Cameron had a follow-up conversation, later posted on YouTube. Cameron, dressed in suit and tie, chatted with Zuckerberg, who wore a blue cotton T-shirt. “Basically, we’ve got a big problem here,” Cameron pointed out to Zuckerberg, describing the U.K.’s financial woes.</p><p>Zuckerberg outlined how Facebook could be used as a platform to decrease spending and increase public participation in the political process: “I mean  all these people have great ideas and a lot of energy that they want to bring, and I think for a lot of people it’s just about having an easy and a cheap way for them too to communicate  their ideas.”</p><p>“Brilliant,” Cameron said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/the_rise_of_facebook_nation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/the_rise_of_facebook_nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why kids need solitude</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10809981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our culture of immediate gratification is changing our children. A teacher and author explains what we\'re losing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demand for remedial instruction in colleges is on the rise. About 75 percent of New York City freshmen attending community college last year needed remedial math, reading or writing courses. The organization that administers the ACT found that only one in four of 2010 high school graduates who took the ACT exam were college-ready in four key subjects areas: English, math, reading and science. Statistics like these are startling, as they not only reveal serious flaws in our educational system, but also raise questions as to how these students will fare in the future if they are lacking the knowledge and critical skills needed to succeed in college and beyond.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Facebook save your life?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10353381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As suicide notes increasingly arrive in status updates, the social-networking site offers help to the despairing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In September 2010, Rutgers freshman <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/gay_teen_suicide_cyberbullying/ ">Tyler Clementi posted on his Facebook page</a> that he was "Jumping off the gw bridge sorry" – and then did. Last Christmas, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1344281/Facebook-suicide-None-Simone-Backs-1-082-online-friends-helped-her.html?ito=feeds-newsxml">Simone Back wrote</a> that she "Took all my pills be dead soon so bye bye every one." Several Facebook "friends" added disparaging comments, but no one stepped forward to check on her. Black's body was found the next day. And last December, <a href="http://gawker.com/5713637/the-facebook-suicide-note-of-school-board-shooter-clay-duke">Clay Duke posted a Facebook "testament,"</a> writing that "Some people (the government sponsored media) will say I was evil, a monster … no…" He then went on a shooting rampage and killed himself.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/can_facebook_save_your_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I won&#8217;t Facebook friend my tween</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10171887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study shows more parents are allowing their kids on Facebook. This mother says no for privacy reasons -- her own]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't want to be my 11-year-old daughter's friend. I don't just mean that in the traditional, "I'm not your friend; I'm your mom" sense. Because I am still not letting my firstborn get on Facebook, she might as well forget about me becoming her friend online any time soon.</p><p>Apparently I'm the minority here. Last week, <a href="http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3850/3075 ">a study of 1,007 parents </a>with children between 10 and 14 found that a stunning half of all parents of 12-year-olds -- and 20 percent of parents of 10-year-olds -- knew that their children were on Facebook. Amazingly, nearly 70 percent of those parents helped their children sign up. Facebook's terms of service prohibit users under the age of 13 from registering. The study certainly confirms what I've noticed over the past year: the increasing presence of my friends' children "liking" their statuses and LOLing their photos.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/i_wont_facebook_friend_my_tween/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is my Facebook page a liberal echo chamber?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/is_my_facebook_page_a_liberal_echo_chamber/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/is_my_facebook_page_a_liberal_echo_chamber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10130688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I defriended an old acquaintance, I had to wonder: Why have I grown so intolerant of any dissent?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago, for reasons I don’t quite understand, I thought it would be a good idea to become Facebook friends with some people I knew in high school. Nostalgic, bored, procrastinating, emotionally unguarded after wrestling the kids into bed, Facebook’s algorithmic magic produced these old classmates’ names and before I knew it, I’d reached out to them with a click.</p><p><em>Why?</em> I wondered almost immediately. These were people to whom I hadn’t spoken in more than 15 years, people I hadn’t much liked at the time, people with whom I’d had little in common besides geographic proximity and attendance at the same underperforming high school in central Virginia. I regretted it instantly, but tried not to worry. After all, I’m Facebook friends with plenty of people I don’t know well or like much, second cousins in south Florida, random playgroup moms, people I’ve met on planes or at Starbucks. What did it really matter -- having a few more virtual strangers in my life. That was what I thought. Then, a day or two later, I read one of their posts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/is_my_facebook_page_a_liberal_echo_chamber/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/is_my_facebook_page_a_liberal_echo_chamber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>147</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The tribesman who Facebook friended me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/the_tribesman_who_facebook_friended_me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/the_tribesman_who_facebook_friended_me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10108053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was a hunter-gatherer from remote Papua New Guinea. And now he was in my feed. How did this happen?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ping!  The other day, I got a Facebook friend request in my in box.  This is now a relatively rare occurrence – I’m long past the frenzy of those first few Facebook months when friend-finding was more satisfying and addictive than chocolate, and I’m done gorging myself on it all.  But, intrigued, I opened it up, to find that this was no ordinary future friend (from the past) – it was a man I’d met while making a film about a tribe from the Sepik Valley in Papua New Guinea. It was a man who was born and raised in a remote hunter-gatherer society, where, to this day, the women spend their time searching out wild sago palms in the swamps to pulp into flour for pancakes, and the men hunt monstrous saltwater crocodiles in tea-colored jungle rivers at night with nothing more than spears. My new Facebook friend no longer joins these hunts – he’s an elder and has managed to find some income in the embryonic Sepik tourist industry – but for many years he <em>was</em> a hunter-gatherer, and now he’s on Facebook!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/the_tribesman_who_facebook_friended_me/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/the_tribesman_who_facebook_friended_me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When mourning goes viral</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2.5 million tweets after Steve Jobs' death prove just how profoundly social media have transformed mourning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon after news of Steve Jobs’ death emerged Wednesday, millions of hashtags, posts and YouTube videos erupted on Facebook and Twitter to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/06/technology/jobss-death-prompts-grief-and-tributes.html">memorialize his life and express sadness</a> for the loss of a technology visionary. Twitter alone was overrun with <a href="http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/07/8206489-25-million-tweets-on-steve-jobs-in-12-hours-after-death">2.5 million tweets</a> about Jobs in the 12 hours after he died. As someone who revolutionized the digital world, it seems eminently appropriate that mourners took their grieving online -- especially since social media has, in many ways, helped reinvent the way we approach death in modern society.</p><p>First, it gives people who have something to say an unprecedented audience that’s both instantaneous and quintessentially democratic. The eulogy is no longer the preserve of the great and the good. Online, anyone can be a broadcaster, a commentator or a curator of news and information.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/digital_mourning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s enraging status update</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social media network annoys its users, again, with a confusing revamp. There must be an agenda here, somewhere]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like, oh, around 750 million other users of Facebook, I logged on to the world's biggest social media network this morning and was immediately annoyed. Facebook had changed its user interface, <em>again.</em> Gone was the "Most Recent" button, which allowed users to see what their friends have posted in a simple, straightforward, chronological order. Now Facebook was indulging, <em>again,</em> in outright effrontery: employing its own secret algorithmic sauce to highlight what it considered the most important "top stories," while mixing in other recent posts far below.</p><p>Facebook also added a "Ticker" at the top right hand side of the page, which provided a real-time Twitter-like stream of status updates from all my friends. When I first checked it, it was packed with complaints about the new interface change. Judging solely from comments from <em>my</em> friends, people don't want Facebook deciding what's most important, Facebook's suggestions were wrong, irrelevant and insulting, and why oh why oh why can't Facebook leave a good thing alone?</p><p>Oh, and people hate change. And, goddammit, they're switching to Google+ (which conveniently opened its doors to the general public today), or Twitter, or giving up on the Internet altogether.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When my one-night stand returned on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/08/30/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never thought I'd see him after we parted 13 years ago. Would my husband be OK if we reconnected? Would I?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Remember me?"</p><p>Two innocuous words on their own, but unsettling when read in a computer screen subject line, sent from a former lover. Of course, I remembered him. In the era before email and text messages, when physical interaction was the most direct form of communication, he caught my waist as I moved across a room. He caught my waist and whispered, "You are so hot."</p><p>It was John Edwards' undoing, and it was mine.</p><p>When I received his Facebook message 13 years later, it shook me. I read two words, but I remembered an entire essay of details. His tan body, the lingering scent of cologne on my pillowcase, Sarah McLachlan on repeat, a cream-colored sweater, and waves breaking along the surf.</p><p>"Now there's a name I haven't heard in a million lifetimes," I typed. As an afterthought, I added, "How are you?" but it seemed inadequate.</p><p>We shared a night backlit by the glow of a South Carolina moon. There was an early morning sunrise, too. He was headed to California for a career in law enforcement, and I was preparing for social work in Ohio.</p><p>If it had been a Hollywood movie, he would have stayed. Or I would have gone with him. Or we would have agreed to meet a year later on the top of the Empire State Building. At the very least, I would have given him my telephone number.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/one_night_stand_comes_back_facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Torn: This week in cultural ambivalence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coen Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Night Lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Torn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're on the fence about: Fake teeth tattoos, Paula Abdul's inner warrior,  "Friday Night Lights'" secret endgame]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fish gotta swim, birds gotta fly, and I have to make sure that I have no idea what is going on with <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/2012_elections/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/08/11/gop_debate_iowa">those Republican debates</a>. Is Michele Bachmann winning? Is that why <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist/index.html">her scary face was on Newsweek</a>? Oh man, what a world, what a world. Oh, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/09/london_riots_explained">London burned down too</a>! Come on, Earth, get it together!</p><p>If you've had enough of the depressing news for the week, feast those things in your ocular cavities on these 10 pop culture stories that we've culled from the Internet and beyond! (But mostly the Internet.) They aren't here to make you feel OK again, but maybe they'll take your mind off the fact that the world is going to hell in a hand basket.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

