<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Fantastic Mr. Fox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/fantastic_mr_fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscar nominations: Trying to please everyone</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/oscar_noms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/oscar_noms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[An Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantastic Mr. Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Clooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meryl Streep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lovely Bones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/02/02/oscar_noms</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar noms spread the love: Sandra Bullock? Check! Giant alien prawns? Check! And, oh yeah, Jim &#038; Kathryn too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what was the inflated Academy Awards best-picture category, expanded this year from five to 10 nominees, going to bring us? More populism or more existentialism? Was it going to open the door to animated films, to fantasy and science fiction, to foreign flicks and low-budget indies -- or just to middle-of-the-road Hollywood sentimentality, calibrated to draw in heartland viewers who've increasingly tuned out the whole Oscar spectacle?</p><p>Given the Academy's catholic desire to please all its contradictory and overlapping constituencies, it shouldn't have surprised anyone that the answer was all of the above. And yet, somehow, it did. I think of the five extra nomination slots as the "Dark Knight" apology awards, but this year offered no exact TDK-cognate, i.e., no commercial-critical behemoth likely to be snubbed by the Academy members' peculiar blend of middlebrow snobbery. (Just to be clear: I didn't like "The Dark Knight" much, personally. But that's irrelevant when it comes to the Oscars. Given its alleged seriousness, cultural impact and box-office firepower, a best-picture nom should have been automatic.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/oscar_noms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/oscar_noms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fantastic Mr. Fox&#8221;: Better than Pixar</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/12/fantastic_mr_fox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/12/fantastic_mr_fox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantastic Mr. Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2009/11/11/fantastic_mr_fox</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wes Anderson's take on Roald Dahl is possibly the best movie about family, community and poultry thievery ever made]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should be something incongruous about the sound of George Clooney's cashmere-flannel voice coming from the mouth of a somewhat rangy-looking fox in a country gent's corduroy suit: Why should a matinee idol suffer the indignity of being trapped in a puppet's body? But from the first minute of the Wes Anderson stop-motion-animated feature "Fantastic Mr. Fox," Clooney <em>is</em> that creature, the genuinely fantastic Mr. Fox of the title, a rapscallion charmer who wears many hats: husband, father, newspaperman, chicken thief. It's one thing for an actor to feel comfortable in his own skin; it's another for him to feel completely at home in the body of a fake-fur and metal-armature <em>vulpus vulpus.</em> And yet Clooney's naturalism is of a piece with the joyous, marvelously detailed movie around him, adapted from Roald Dahl's novel with adventurousness and seemingly boundless love by Anderson and Noah Baumbach. "Fantastic Mr. Fox" is possibly the finest picture about family, community and poultry thievery ever made.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/12/fantastic_mr_fox/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/12/fantastic_mr_fox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

