<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Fashion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/fashion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:53:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Asian teenagers flock to get &#8220;fashion&#8221; braces</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/asian_teenagers_flock_to_get_fashion_braces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/asian_teenagers_flock_to_get_fashion_braces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[braces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southeast Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correcting a malocclusion has never been so chic ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Braces, long the symbol of nerds, geeks, mouth-breathers and others who dwell at the bottom of the high school food chain, have suddenly become très chic. Well, at least in certain parts of Thailand, Indonesia and Malayasia.</p><p>Many teens in Southeast Asia have been shelling out more than $100 for so-called <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/fashion/asian-teens-shell-money-fake-fashion-braces-article-1.1230910#ixzz2GqWL1dIh" target="_blank">black market braces</a>, mouth gear that doesn't serve any function other than fashion -- and status. While being a brace-face stateside might be a drag, real braces cost close to $1,200 in places like Bangkok, putting dental care far out of reach for the average family. As a result, braces have become a surprising status symbol.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/asian_teenagers_flock_to_get_fashion_braces/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/asian_teenagers_flock_to_get_fashion_braces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rape is not a &#8220;fashion violation&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/rape_is_not_a_fashion_violation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/rape_is_not_a_fashion_violation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anand Jon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A victim of designer Anand Jon, a convicted rapist, reacts to W magazine's glib headline about his criminal trials]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tucked in the left column of Page 238 in the November 2012 issue of W Magazine (Collectors’ Edition) is a picture of fashion designer Anand Jon bookended by models scarcely clad in boas and sequins. The picture accompanies a blurb titled “Fashion Violations,” though the violations to which the blurb refers do not pertain to lipstick-stained teeth or the kind of clashing ensemble Joan Rivers prays for. Rather, it refers to the one count of rape, and 15 counts of sexual assault on girls as young as 14 that landed Jon a 59-year-to-life sentence in jail. And that’s just his punishment thus far. Jon has yet to stand trial in New York and Texas to face similar allegations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/rape_is_not_a_fashion_violation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/rape_is_not_a_fashion_violation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lena Dunham wears shirt, forgets pants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/lena_dunham_wears_shirt_forgets_pants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/lena_dunham_wears_shirt_forgets_pants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13026773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pants. Who needs them, anyway?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as you're not Kate Middleton, being photographed without any pants on is not scandalous. This weekend, Lena Dunham, the confident, quirky star and writer of HBO's "Girls," set out to prove the point when she showed up at the <a href="http://www.alexslemonade.org/campaign/la-loves-alexs-lemonade">L.A. Loves Alex's Lemonade</a> event this weekend, wearing nothing but a flowy blouse and contrasting polka-dot slippers. OK, Lena Dunham, you resent the constraints clothing imposes. We get it! We applaud you. Now please, put some pants on.</p><p><img src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/o-LENA-DUNHAM-5706-e1349104435109-135x300.jpg" alt="LenaDunham" /></p><p>Paul Archuleta/FilmMagic</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/lena_dunham_wears_shirt_forgets_pants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/lena_dunham_wears_shirt_forgets_pants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skorts killed my sex appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/skorts_killed_my_sex_appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/skorts_killed_my_sex_appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Athleta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13018075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a busy mom, I thought they would be so convenient. But one little vowel made a huge difference in my self-esteem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last spring I noticed another mother at the park wearing a lightweight, gray, A-line skirt that hit just above her knee.  She had my build -- 13-year-old boy from the waist up, prodigiously gifted in the hip department -- but she looked happy. At ease. Must be the skirt, I thought, and approached:</p><p>“Do you mind me asking where you found that skirt?”</p><p>“Oh, it’s not a skirt,” she said. “It’s a skort. There are shorts under here. It doesn’t wrinkle, and it doesn’t stain.”</p><p>By jove, the woman had full coverage! That explained her smile. And such an intriguing concept, this wicking fabric. I have two children under the age of 5, so for the foreseeable future, my wardrobe needs resemble those of a typical frat boy. As in, we both want clothes that puke won’t stain.</p><p>Full coverage could be had, other mother said, with a visit to the Athleta website. Available in khakina, asphalt, dismal, dumpy, cheerless and sexless, the “Whatever” skort is one of 18 styles of skort sold by Athleta, the sporty sister in the Gap family.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/skorts_killed_my_sex_appeal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/skorts_killed_my_sex_appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird news: Student kicked out for wearing tights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/weird_news_student_kicked_out_for_wearing_tights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/weird_news_student_kicked_out_for_wearing_tights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird news of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clothing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13009650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An 11-year old honors student was reprimanded for wearing tights that matched her skin color]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mount Gleason Middle School has a dress code that prohibits students from wearing tights as pants, and rightly so. Yolanda Turnstill, the mother of  Deja, an 11-year-student at Mount Gleason, doesn't agree. On letting her daughter wear just tights, she told KTLA, "She wears them all the time, all the time." In fact, according to Turnstill, "80 percent" of Deja's wardrobe is tights. Oof.</p><p>While one may reasonably question Yolanda Turnstill's (and her daughter's) fashion sense, she may have some reason to be angry. Turnstill maintains that the school kicked Deja, an honors student, out of class for wearing tights. Except, according to Turnstill, it wasn't <em>just</em> for wearing tights. It was because she wore <em>brown</em> tights. Deja's teacher's assistant "allegedly said the tights were too racy because their color made it appear Deja was not wearing pants," Turnstill told <a href="http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-tights-school-controversy,0,961786.story">KTLA</a>.</p><p>Turnstill continued:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/weird_news_student_kicked_out_for_wearing_tights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/weird_news_student_kicked_out_for_wearing_tights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stars come for fourth annual Fashion Night Out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/shoppers_meet_kardashian_miss_piggy_on_night_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/shoppers_meet_kardashian_miss_piggy_on_night_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Upton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/shoppers_meet_kardashian_miss_piggy_on_night_out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian, Kate Upton, Cyndi Lauper, and other celebs came out for Fashion Night Out in New York]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — Donna Karan mingled with Miss Piggy, Michael Kors judged karaoke with Kate Upton and Kim Kardashian signed perfume sets Thursday as shoppers broke out their stilettos — and their wallets — for the fourth annual Fashion's Night Out.</p><p>The celebrity-studded night lured shoppers into stores for celebrity spotting, music, giveaways, food and drinks, and, just maybe, shopping.</p><p>By early evening in New York, the basement beauty floor of Bergdorf Goodman was packed. Madeleine Russell of Manhattan, wearing her FNO shirt from last year, got her nails done ahead of a long line. She attends Fashion's Night Out events every year.</p><p>"I'm inspired by all the fashion around me and I get my own ideas," she said.</p><p>Like the FNO pro she is, Russell planned to head home from Bergdorf to put on makeup and her Manolo Blahniks to see Cyndi Lauper at the Blahnik store promoting her new musical, "Kinky Boots."</p><p>Across town, Kim Kardashian signed $123 gift sets of her perfume True Reflection at Lord &amp; Taylor and was ready to hop a plane to Charlotte, N.C., for an after party for the Democratic National Convention.</p><p>"Because it is a lot of running around I wanted to be comfortable," she said. "This Tom Ford dress is, like, stretchy. So at least I'm really comfortable."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/shoppers_meet_kardashian_miss_piggy_on_night_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/shoppers_meet_kardashian_miss_piggy_on_night_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t dress your baby like a jerk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/06/dont_dress_your_baby_like_a_jerk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/06/dont_dress_your_baby_like_a_jerk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12952155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A "sexist" onesie spurs outrage, but the bikini's not the problem. It's all of you "cool," "funny" parents]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babies are great because you can dress them up funny and they can't do a damn thing about it. It's a little parental payback for the way they mercilessly wring out your life force. But parents, I beseech you, just because you can turn your infant into a sartorial punch line, don't.</p><p>Consider, for example, the case of the sexy onesie. This week, the Mississippi department store Gordman's found itself the center of national attention when a concerned mom <a href="http://www.wmctv.com/story/18936817/bikini-baby-outfit-outrages-some-parentshttp://">notified a local news team</a> about a baby outfit embellished to look like a curvaceous, bikini-clad female trunk. As parent Laura Faulkner disgustedly told WMC-TV, "It puts out a bad meaning about society for them to want to put something like that on an 18-month-old baby." And a local father chimed in that, "I think it gives people the wrong idea."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/06/dont_dress_your_baby_like_a_jerk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/06/dont_dress_your_baby_like_a_jerk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap chic ruined us</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/13/cheap_chic_ruined_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/13/cheap_chic_ruined_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12935760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like fast food, fast fashion hurts the economy, environment -- and our souls. The author of "Overdressed" explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average American buys 64 pieces of clothing a year. That's more new tank tops and jeggings than there are weeks in which to wear them. And we buy those items, often, with the tacit understanding that the pullover purchased in January isn't going to make it to Christmas -- or even spring equinox. Elizabeth L. Cline has one such typical American wardrobe. As she admits in her new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Overdressed-Shockingly-High-Cheap-Fashion/dp/1591844614/saloncom08-20">"Overdressed: The Shockingly High Cost of Cheap Fashion,"</a> an eye-opening exploration of our mania for bargain-basement fashion: "I paid less than $30 per item on average for each piece of clothing in my closet. Most of my shoes cost less than $15." She describes an inventory of, "socks and underwear notwithstanding," some 364 pieces of clothing.</p><p>We all have closets overflowing with clothing, drawers spilling over with T-shirts, and underwear in every color of the rainbow. Yet, as Cline tells us, "We spend more money on eating out in restaurants" than we do on attiring ourselves – and only 3 percent of the measly amount we spend on clothing goes to apparel made in the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/13/cheap_chic_ruined_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/13/cheap_chic_ruined_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kenneth Cole gets schooled</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/kenneth_cole_gets_schooled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/kenneth_cole_gets_schooled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: The fashion mogul has backed off his assault on schoolteachers after a public outcry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[UPDATE BELOW]</strong></p><p>It was always bound to go there, but few likely expected it would be so blatant. I'm talking about the ongoing campaign against organized labor; for decades deeply rooted in American political culture, the crusade has been periodically amplified in popular culture as well, from 1954's "On the Waterfront" all the way to the Sopranos' depiction of mob-controlled unions (and sometimes pop culture and political culture have even <a href="http://blog.oregonlive.com/mapesonpolitics/2008/08/antiunion_group_enlists_sopran.html">fused</a>). So it was only a matter of time before vilifying rank-and-file union members would be commodified into a consumer brand by a company looking for an edge in the high-end retail market.</p><p>That's where Kenneth Cole now comes in. The clothing designer has just launched a new crusade to tie his expensive clothing and shoes line to the elite's movement du jour: the fight to demonize public schoolteachers and their unions. In a <a href="http://wheredoyoustand.awearness.com/system/billboards/56/original/wellred_WDYS_2.png?1331736329">billboard</a> and <a href="http://www.awearness.com/#Page_WDYSNewsPage">Web-based campaign</a>, Cole's foundation portrays the national debate over education as one that supposedly pits "Teachers' Rights vs. Students' Rights."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/kenneth_cole_gets_schooled/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/kenneth_cole_gets_schooled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The true meaning of prep</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/the_true_meaning_of_prep/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/the_true_meaning_of_prep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12813501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whit Stillman's "Damsels in Distress" celebrates preppy life. Too bad it leaves out its complex cultural baggage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have heard that the director Whit Stillman, whose fourth movie, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/pick_of_the_week_delirious_college_comedy_damsels_in_distress/singleton/">"Damsels in Distress,"</a> opens Friday, is a chronicler of preppy culture. It’s not true. Stillman makes delightful movies, featuring light, witty scripts spoken by perfectly cast actors. But to consider Stillman an ethnographer of prep is to misunderstand both prep and Stillman movies.</p><p>It’s true that Stillman’s characters often wear stereotypically preppy clothing. They can be found in madras plaids, blue blazers, Lacoste shirts and other clothes historically associated with our country’s most selective colleges and the private schools that prepare — hence “prep” — students for them. They mention Brooks Brothers and Sag Harbor in casual conversation. But prepdom, as I understand it, and as I learned it in my own prep school and college, is only partly about clothing. It is more properly understood as an orientation toward power.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/the_true_meaning_of_prep/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/the_true_meaning_of_prep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Before Trayvon Martin&#8217;s hoodie: A history of controversial fashion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/before_trayvon_martins_hoodie_a_history_of_controversial_fashion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/before_trayvon_martins_hoodie_a_history_of_controversial_fashion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayvon Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12766341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't tell Geraldo, but hooded sweatshirts are just the latest in a long line of ridiculously "suspicious" clothes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to an acidic mix of harebrained punditry, blame-the-victim ethos and our national talent for self-distraction, America has been suckered into a debate about hooded sweatshirts in the wake of the Trayvon Martin tragedy.</p><p>Why the hoodie and why now? Do some clothes really suggest stronger criminal tendencies than others? The hoodie allows its wearer to hide under a little mobile shadow and enjoy a measure of anonymity. But if Martin had been shot in a pea coat with the collar popped, we wouldn't be debating the sinister implications of wide lapels.</p><p>The hoodie is not the most vilified garment in American history -- that can be gauged by the fact that no member of Congress has shown up to work in a burqa, along the lines of U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush's <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57405846-503544/dem-rep-bobby-rush-escorted-from-house-floor-for-wearing-hoodie-in-honor-of-trayvon-martin/">hoodie stunt</a> last Wednesday. In the past century, the lineup of suspicious clothing has included trench coats, jeans and stiletto heels. And they are all presumed innocent until proven guilty.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/before_trayvon_martins_hoodie_a_history_of_controversial_fashion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/before_trayvon_martins_hoodie_a_history_of_controversial_fashion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The prettiest boy in the world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/the_prettiest_boy_in_the_world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/the_prettiest_boy_in_the_world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12350601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Bosnian male model is now appearing in bra ads -- and challenging how we think about beauty]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.salon.com/img/partners/ID_imprint.gif" alt="Imprint" align="left" /></a>Recently in Holland there appeared a series of ads designed by Doom&amp;Dickson for a HEMA's push-up bra, using this tag line:</p><blockquote><p>A push-up bra that gives you 2 cup sizes extra. Modeled by Andrej Pejic. A man. So imagine what it can do for a woman.</p></blockquote><p>Andrej Pejic, a male model from Bosnia, is from <a href="http://imprint.printmag.com/inspiration/the-most-excellent-mikser-festival/">my neck of the woods</a> and is also known as "the prettiest boy in the world." In the fashion industry, where a small percentage of female models succeed, Andrej is widely accepted as one of the top supermodels by fashion and mainstream media (See covers below).</p><p>When you find out he is a man, does he become less beautiful? If so, does that challenge your thinking about beauty?</p><p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/136.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-258991" title="1" src="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/136.jpg" alt="" width="460" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/the_prettiest_boy_in_the_world/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/the_prettiest_boy_in_the_world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the vultures took Jason Wu for Target</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/how_the_vultures_took_jason_wu_for_target/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/how_the_vultures_took_jason_wu_for_target/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12313201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Target's new line by the beloved designer brought out bloody instincts in consumers. And I was there to witness it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you thought the End of Days was going to resemble <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/06/super_bowl_ads_the_good_the_bad_and_the_80s/singleton/%20">a Chevy ad</a>, you must not have been near a Target on Sunday. <a href="http://life.salon.com/2011/09/14/missoni_disaster/">September's Missonigeddon</a> might have been intense, but it turned out to be small taters compared to the Jason Wupocalypse. This is how civilization ends. Not with a nuclear missile strike but with a run on kitty cat-festooned tote bags.</p><p>Jason Wu is the young, impeccably elegant designer whose career went into the stratosphere when high-profile Michelle Obama chose his dreamy, one-shouldered creation for her husband's inaugural ball in 2009. His preppy-with-an-edge ready-to-wear designs retail at high-end stores like Neiman Marcus and Nordstrom for upward of a thousand bucks a pop. So from the moment Target – which has in the past done wildly successful collaborations with the likes of <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2009/01/mcqueen_for_target.html#">Alexander McQueen</a>, <a href="http://www.fabsugar.com/Jean-Paul-Gaultier-Target-Looks-2010-02-10-110637-7346336?slide=1 ">Jean Paul Gaultier</a> and Rodarte -- announced that it was teaming up with Wu for a February launch, the slavering began. And when Target released a preview teaser of zippy little navy and cream ensembles, we all pretty much knew: There would be blood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/how_the_vultures_took_jason_wu_for_target/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/how_the_vultures_took_jason_wu_for_target/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The absurd life of an Abercrombie &amp; Fitch model</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/the_absurd_life_of_an_abercrombie_fitch_model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/the_absurd_life_of_an_abercrombie_fitch_model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12292011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did a regular guy like me stumble into a job of emaciated youths and anonymous six-packs? Funny you should ask]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Remember, we don’t do any advertising. So you </em>are<em> our advertising. You represent our brand. You </em>are<em> Ambercrombie &amp; Fitch.”</em></p><p>Hey, guys — what’s going on? I am Ambercrombie &amp; Fitch. I model for them at their store in the financial district in New York City, but I also do way, way more. I can find different sizes for you if you need it, but if not — hey, that’s cool. No pressure. I can also muss with clothing. Oh, and did I mention that I can shimmy? I can shimmy and gyrate and smell good doing it. I am Ambercrombie &amp; Fitch.</p><p>You’re probably curious about a few things right now. One, is this idiot serious? I am. Two, what do I look like shirtless? Very cold. And, perhaps, three: How did this happen? How did a regular guy stumble into a job of emaciated youths and anonymous six-packs? How does one become a “model” for Ambercrombie &amp; Fitch? One recent Tuesday afternoon, I was walking down upper Broadway trying to ignore the rain and avoid eye contact with every other street-bound soul when it happened. I was discovered. Yes, discovered.</p><p>“Hey! Hey!” a curly-haired 20-something I soon learned was named Vanessa shouted after me. “Hey. We just <em>love</em> your look.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/the_absurd_life_of_an_abercrombie_fitch_model/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/the_absurd_life_of_an_abercrombie_fitch_model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The elitist history of Mitt Romney&#8217;s slick hair</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/the_elitist_history_of_mitt_romneys_hair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/the_elitist_history_of_mitt_romneys_hair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12181961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is grease good? His hairstyle reminds us of Gordon Gekko, film's top vulture capitalist, but goes back further]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For businessman-turned-politician Mitt Romney, "looking the part" isn't necessarily a good thing. At a time when the presidential candidate is being pilloried as a vulture capitalist by rivals from both parties -- yesterday's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/romneys_scandalous_tax_loophole/">revelation about his low income-tax rate</a> is just more fodder for an already healthy fire -- he also sports the hair of a vulture capitalist. It recalls the slicked-back style of "Wall Street's" infamous Gordon Gekko.</p><p>When slicked-back hair is associated with the likes of a corporate raider like Gekko -- Maureen Dowd <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/11/opinion/dowd-a-perfect-doll.html">wrote</a> just last week that Republicans in New Hampshire were "painting Romney as a ruthless Gekko, complete with a 1980s-era slicked-back mane" -- it's safe to say the signals that it sends are negative. That's particularly the case in the current, Wall Street-wary climate. But where did the slicked-back style originate? What other cultural connotations does it command?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/the_elitist_history_of_mitt_romneys_hair/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/the_elitist_history_of_mitt_romneys_hair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war over sexist onesies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/21/the_war_over_sexist_onesies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/21/the_war_over_sexist_onesies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10244755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gymboree's "Pretty Like Mommy" line reinforces harmful stereotypes. It might seem minor, but here's why it matters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's just baby clothes, for God's sake. What's the big deal? Or, as Sasha Brown-Worsham declared on the Stir, those <a href="http://thestir.cafemom.com/baby/128928/moms_freaked_over_sexist_onesie">"Moms Freaked Over 'Sexist' Onesie Need to Chill." </a></p><p>Indeed, in a world in which little girls are peddled <a href="http://jezebel.com/5859560/crotchless-thong-underwear-for-the-mature-7+year+old-in-your-life">crotchless thongs</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/abercrombie_fitch_pushup_bikinis_for_children/">push-up bras</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/29/playboy_wants_your_tween/">Playboy bunny-themed accessories,</a> Gymboree's controversial onesies declaring that baby boys are "Smart Like Dad" while girls are "Pretty Like Mommy" seem like pretty small potatoes. Yet when images of the outfits hit the Web, the outraged Moms Rising advocacy group <a href="http://action.momsrising.org/letter/gymboreeonesies/?fs=fb">created a petition noting</a> "there's no option to purchase a Smart Like Mommy onesie for boys or girls." They urged Gymboree to "stop selling children’s clothing that promotes harmful gender stereotypes immediately."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/21/the_war_over_sexist_onesies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/21/the_war_over_sexist_onesies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What would Superman wear</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/superhero_fashion_imprint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/superhero_fashion_imprint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10177892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a charity benefit, fashion designers dress and create their own superheroes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.salon.com/img/partners/ID_imprint.gif" alt="Imprint" align="left" /></a>The <a href="http://www.superherosupplies.com/">Brooklyn Superhero Supply Co.</a> presented its Spring 2012 Collection on Monday, Oct. 24 at the Ace Hotel.</p><p>The evening was a benefit for <a href="http://826nyc.org/">826NYC</a> and featured a collection of original and one-of-a-kind crime-fighting attire for superheroes created by various designers -- <a href="http://www.openingceremony.us/">Opening Ceremony</a>, Christian Joy, <a href="http://renatamorales.com/">Renata Morales</a>, <a href="http://chromatgarments.com/">Chromat Garments</a>, <a href="http://mattsinger.net/">Matt Singer</a>, Complex Geometries, United Bamboo and others.</p><p>All proceeds from the evening went to benefit 826NYC, allowing them to continue to help students complete their homework, get into college, improve their writing skills, rediscover themselves as artists/authors/filmmakers/musicians, and collaborate with a community of volunteers who care about their success.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/superhero_fashion_imprint/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/superhero_fashion_imprint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside Elizabeth Taylor&#8217;s blockbuster wardrobe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/elizabeth_taylor_fashion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/elizabeth_taylor_fashion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/09/20/elizabeth_taylor_fashion</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slide show: Nine of the screen siren's outfits, from the collection set to be auctioned by Christie's this winter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Taylor's allure was such that it probably didn't matter what she wore; particularly in her younger years, she would arguably have been attractive in almost anything. And yet, her monumental wardrobe is testament to the fact that she left nothing to chance, choosing outfits and accessories that accentuated her good looks with their own stylishness and class.</p><p>Click through the following slide show for a short preview of the hundreds of fashion-related items from Taylor's personal collection that are set to be auctioned by Christie's this winter (and take note: before they go on sale, standout pieces from the collection will tour the world; an exhibition will hit Los Angeles in October, and New York at the beginning of December). Among other things, you'll see a surprisingly simple yellow chiffon wedding dress; an embroidered robe that Taylor wore to Grace Kelly's 1969 "Scorpio Ball;" and an eye-catching Versace jacket -- worn by Taylor to two AIDS benefits -- that features the face of its photogenic owner herself.</p><p>For full details of the Christie's collection (which also includes Taylor's <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-20103247-10391698.html?tag=mncol;lst;2">jewelry</a> and other personal items), including tour and sale dates, click <a href="http://www.christies.com/elizabethtaylor/the_sales.aspx">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/elizabeth_taylor_fashion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/elizabeth_taylor_fashion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why ironic T-shirts push real buttons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/controversial_shirts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/controversial_shirts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2011/09/02/controversial_shirts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sincere anger against JCPenney and American Apparel T-shirts proves some gender issues are too real to laugh at]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JCPenney became the latest retailer to make itself the target of <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/08/jc_penneys_too.php">protests</a> this week when it offered a T-shirt, aimed at preteen and teenage girls, emblazoned with the words "I'm too pretty to do homework so my brother does it for me." As has happened with similar offerings over the last decade, protests fell swiftly into shape. A <a href="http://www.change.org/petitions/tell-jcpenney-to-stop-promoting-sexist-messaging-to-girls">Change.org petition</a> denouncing the shirt garnered thousands of signatures, bloggers like those at Gawker Media's Jezebel&#160; turned the tacky offering into a <a href="http://jezebel.com/5836173/jcpenney-will-destroy-your-daughters-self-esteem-for-just-999">national story,</a> and inevitably, JCPenney announced that it was <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/01/earlyshow/living/parenting/main20100427.shtml">pulling the shirt from its back-to-school collection.</a></p><p>Besides the fact that the slogan doesn't really make much sense -- not that we want girls to use their looks instead of their heads, but shouldn't they woo peers and not siblings? -- the predictable flap illustrates a larger truth. If you're trying to make money by getting people to plaster ridiculous sayings across their chests, it's better to go surreal or silly than stereotypical.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/controversial_shirts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/controversial_shirts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five pop culture items we missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/pop_five_breaking_bad_finale_kate_gosselin_canceled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/pop_five_breaking_bad_finale_kate_gosselin_canceled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Gosselin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Real Housewives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/15/pop_five_breaking_bad_finale_kate_gosselin_canceled</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's catch: End of "Breaking Bad," "Real Housewives" hit the road, and Tina Fey welcomes normal-named baby]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1. Unnecessary tour of the day:</strong> <a href="http://www.eonline.com/news/real_housewives_announce_big/258037">"The Real Housewives" Live Tour</a> will feature women from all of the different manifestations of Bravo's reality show as they perform ... what exactly? Do any of them have actual talents? I had hoped <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/21/simon_van_kempen_real_housewives_music/index.html">this was to be a musical production of some sort</a>, with costumes by Shere&#233; Whitfield and wigs by Kim Zolciak, but apparently it's just going to involve the women taking their reunion episodes on the road.</p><p><strong>2. Cancellation of the day:</strong> Sorry, Kate Gosselin, your money train is at an end, as <a href="http://videogum.com/353762/r-i-p-jon-and-kate-plus-8/tv/reality-tv">TLC has just canceled " Kate Plus 8."&#160;</a> Don't worry, I'm sure you will find other ways to exploit your children for cash ... maybe have the younger ones try out for "Toddlers &amp; Tiaras"?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/pop_five_breaking_bad_finale_kate_gosselin_canceled/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/pop_five_breaking_bad_finale_kate_gosselin_canceled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>