<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Performance counts more than connections for women on Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/report_on_wall_st_performance_counts_more_than_connections_for_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/report_on_wall_st_performance_counts_more_than_connections_for_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13162115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to climbing the corporate ladder, it's what you know for women -- and who you know for men ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Economic Association <a href="http://www.aeaweb.org/aea/2013conference/program/meetingpapers.php" target="_blank">finds</a> that it's more difficult for women to succeed on Wall Street than for men. What's more surprising is that they succeed in different ways: It's <em>what </em>you know that counts most for women and <em>who </em>you know for men (bold text mine):</p><blockquote><p>Male and female analysts are equally connected on average. <strong>Connection is associated with more accurate earnings forecasts for men, but not for women.</strong> Controlling for accuracy, connection is important in explaining men’s, but not women’s, probability of being voted by institutional investors as “star” analysts, an important measure of career success. <strong>For women, education achievements and accurate forecasts are important factors that determine voting outcomes.</strong> This asymmetry in the effect of connections between the two genders does not exist in an alternative, computerized process of evaluating analysts, and is most pronounced among young analysts. Our results suggest that men reap higher returns from connections than women, and that investors are more willing to rely on soft information such as connections to evaluate men than women.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/report_on_wall_st_performance_counts_more_than_connections_for_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/report_on_wall_st_performance_counts_more_than_connections_for_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zooey Deschanel declares her feminism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/zooey_deschanel_declares_her_feminism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/zooey_deschanel_declares_her_feminism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zooey Deschanel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marissa Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Adorkable" icon Zooey Deschanel boldly goes where few modern female celebrities would dare to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zooey Deschanel, you make feminism totes adorbs. The star of the self-proclaimed "adorkable" Fox sitcom "New Girl" has in recent years been spiraling into a tailspin of overwrought cuteness, a Lindsay Lohan on a bender of twee. Yet in the new issue of Glamour,  it's that same woman, the one who co-founded a site called <a href="http://hellogiggles.com/about">Hello Giggles</a>, for God's sake, who unreservedly declares herself a feminist. A f---king feminist, in fact.</p><p>In the interview, Deschanel, the doe-eyed, <a href="http://youtu.be/fkg4W-k3eUA">ukulele-playing</a> poster child for <a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/skip-whimsically-through-the-history-of-manic-pixi,82938/">Manic Pixie Dreamgirlism</a>, takes charge of a conversation about women, media and image in a way that proves she may look like a fluffy kitten, but she's fierce as a lioness. When asked if she'd one day like to have children, Deschanel shoots down the question by replying, "That is so personal, and it’s my pet peeve when people press you on it. And it’s always women who get asked! Is anybody saying that to George Clooney?" And she has a reply for all the critics who question her sunshine-sweet image: "If you are tearing down somebody who has forged her own path just for wearing a tiara, rethink your priorities. I never stop myself from doing something because I’m afraid of what people might think." ZING.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/zooey_deschanel_declares_her_feminism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/zooey_deschanel_declares_her_feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women&#8217;s history pioneer Gerda Lerner dies at 92</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/womens_history_pioneer_gerda_lerner_dies_at_92_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/womens_history_pioneer_gerda_lerner_dies_at_92_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obituaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lerner was a founding member of NOW and created the nation's first graduate program in women's history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MILWAUKEE (AP) — Gerda Lerner spent her 18th birthday in a Nazi prison, sharing a cell with two gentile women arrested for political work who shared their food with the Jewish teenager because jailers restricted rations for Jews.</p><p>Lerner would say years later that the women taught her during those six weeks how to survive and that the experience taught her how society can manipulate people. It was a lesson that the women's history pioneer, who died Wednesday at age 92, said she saw reinforced in American academia by history professors who taught as though only the men were worth studying.</p><p>"When I was faced with noticing that half the population has no history and I was told that that's normal, I was able to resist the pressure" to accept that conclusion, Lerner told the Wisconsin Academic Review in 2002.</p><p>The author was a founding member of the National Organization for Women and is credited with creating the nation's first graduate program in women's history, in the 1970s in New York.</p><p>Her son said she died peacefully of apparent old age at an assisted-living facility in Madison, where she helped establish a doctoral program in women's history at the University of Wisconsin.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/womens_history_pioneer_gerda_lerner_dies_at_92_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/womens_history_pioneer_gerda_lerner_dies_at_92_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How feminism caused Sandy Hook, according to the right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those on the right who would blame the tragedy on anything but guns see women as the problem -- not the heroes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dogged wish of many on the right to make the tragic Sandy Hook shooting about anything but guns means that it has to be about other things -- ideally, things they already do not like. Things like feminism, abortion or anything else that contributes to the oppression of white men, of which, you’ll note, murderous rampager Adam Lanza was one. And when it came to the last point, solipsism was not limited to the right. Here, a guide to the lowlights.</p><p><strong>Blame Obamacare and abortion. </strong>We heard, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/huckabee_blames_gays_for_the_newtown_massacre/">early out of the gate,</a> from Mike Huckabee, who didn’t wait for the funerals to start blaming the liberal banishment of God from schools and government, including “tax-funded abortion pills,” by which the Personhood proponent meant birth control. “We dismiss the notion of natural law and the notion that there are moral absolutes and seemed amazed when some kids make it their own morality to kill innocent children. We diminish and even hold in contempt <a href="http://mikehuckabee.com/mike-huckabee-news?ID=70415326-e438-41e4-9972-467097d2029f&amp;buffer_share=45810&amp;utm_source=buffer">the natural family of a father and mother </a>creating and then responsibly raising the next generation and then express dismay that kids feel no real connection to their families or even the concept of a family.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curse of my birthing hips</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/curse_of_my_birthing_hips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/curse_of_my_birthing_hips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My body promised warmth and maternal comfort, but I wanted nothing to do with a family]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first heard that I had childbearing hips before I even got my first period. One of my middle school classmates — a beauty with a coltish build — assessed my dumpy, dough-pale body in the locker room, and declared, without malice, that I had what her grandmother called “birthin’ hips.”</p><p>At 13, I had no idea what my thick hips had to do with birth, but I was terrified by the prospect of having to care for (another) someone else. I was the loud one who drew my father’s ire — and his fists — away from my brother. I was my mother’s “little hero”: the one who powdered her black eyes and told her she was still pretty, the one who swallowed her secrets so she could shimmer in the eyes of her fellow PTA members. She taught me to draw and to drive, to bake lasagna that would make men lick their plates and to fill up with Crystal Light and water so I wouldn’t be too hungry, wouldn’t eat too much of my own food.</p><p>She’d been, in her words, “flat as a board” until plumping up while carrying me; then, she said, she “looked like a spark plug.” Her body was as soft as her will; she yielded to buttered biscuits and apologies whispered in the dark. When I was a teenager, both of our bodies embarrassed me equally. I remember the sight of us in one fitting room mirror: Her hips, narrow; her belly puckered by a Caesarean scar. My hips mocked hers with their abundance.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/curse_of_my_birthing_hips/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/curse_of_my_birthing_hips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My shazam boobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/my_shazam_boobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/my_shazam_boobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a feminist, I believe breasts shouldn't matter. So why do I care so much how mine look, and whether I lose them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Are you upset about losing your breast?” I asked Mary, my grandmother, while my grandfather brought the car around. This was June 2000, and she had accepted the news from the doctor calmly, with one hand in mine, the other in my grandfather’s. A mastectomy was called for; she had declined reconstructive plastic surgery, dismissing it out of hand. “You know you can always change your mind and get the plastic surgery later,” I continued. She laughed. “I don’t care about that, honey,” she said. “I just hope the cancer hasn’t spread.” And that was that. We set a date for the surgery and went home.</p><p>She was 76, I was 32. I had recently started dating the man I would soon marry. When I told Andy that if I had breast cancer, I would feel the way Mary did — that I would be fine with having a mastectomy, I just wouldn’t want to die — he replied “But I like your breasts. You’d try to keep them for me, right?”</p><p>The night after my grandmother’s mastectomy, Andy took my nipples into his mouth before we made love in a grand, unusual gesture. “I shouldn’t ignore your breasts,” he whispered. As if he were nervous that they might be gone someday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/my_shazam_boobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/my_shazam_boobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t hate me because I&#8217;m beautiful</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/dont_hate_her_because_im_beautiful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/dont_hate_her_because_im_beautiful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fitness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kickstarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tavi gevinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tired of being bullied for her killer abs, Britton Delizia is fighting back -- with bullying of her own]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to be a woman in this country! We still earn, on average, 25 percent <a title="Gender pay gap " href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2012/10/24/gender-pay-gap/1652511/" target="_blank">less</a> than our male colleagues. We still do <a title="Women still do most of the housework " href="http://feministing.com/2012/06/26/sixty-percent-of-women-are-primary-breadwinner-but-still-doing-most-of-the-housework/" target="_blank">most</a> of the housework and child-raising. Elected officials still think it is OK to make personal medical choices for us, while others ascribe supernatural <a title="Todd Akin " href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/08/gop-senate-candidate-akin-says-pregnancy-rare-in-legitimate-rape/" target="_blank">powers </a>to our lady parts. Life is complicated all over. So when Britton Delizia says that she has been bullied because she is naturally skinny and has killer abs, why not believe her? And when she launches a <a title="Britton Delizia Kickstarter" href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/learningtoapologize/im-learning-to-apologise-for-my-metabolism-photo-b" target="_blank">Kickstarter</a> to fund a photography book that celebrates "fitness" and "healthy living"? Sure, feel free.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/dont_hate_her_because_im_beautiful/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/dont_hate_her_because_im_beautiful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case against Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/the_case_against_hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/the_case_against_hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haim Saban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An admirer explains: A campaign based on her inevitability and entitlement would crash and burn like it did in 2008]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As November's election results sink in and the size of President Obama's victory becomes clearer – he won 332 electoral votes and more than 51 percent of the popular vote -- Democrats are uncharacteristically giddy about 2016. Not only is demography on the party's side, with the share of the young, female and non-white vote rising almost every year, but destiny seems to be, too. Our first black president could be succeeded by our first female president, since the party's star, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, would immediately become the front-runner for the nomination, and for election, if she decides to run.</p><p>I supported Hillary Clinton in 2008. Smarter people than I believe she will run in 2016, despite her protests, and I mostly hope she does. Chances are I would support her again. There is no other strong certain candidate in the field. Vice President Biden and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo are likely to stay out of the race if she runs. Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley probably would, or should, too. He doesn't have the stature to successfully challenge her. And there's no obvious liberal or progressive star to date. Talk about a run by, say, Massachusetts Sen.-elect Elizabeth Warren seems premature to me, as much as I admire her: Let's give her a little time in the Senate to make a difference before pushing her onto the national stage. Of course, it's still quite early, and an inspiring figure may well emerge who could give Clinton an energetic run from the left. Almost nobody was betting on Sen. Barack Obama on Dec. 4, 2005. So we'll see.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/the_case_against_hillary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/the_case_against_hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet of the day: &#8220;So feminine&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_so_feminine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_so_feminine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What liberals have done to the world, according to one Twitter user]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embedtweet id="275689010196774912"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_so_feminine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_so_feminine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eighth grader takes on the Easy-Bake Oven</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easy-bake oven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An eighth grader is petitioning Hasbro to start featuring boys in its ads for the mini-oven -- and ditch the pink]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey eighth grader McKenna Pope is sick and tired of hearing that baking is <em>girly</em>. She knows that male celebrity chefs like Jamie Oliver and Alton Brown are no strangers to perfectly flaky pie crust, and Pope's 4-year-old brother, Gavyn, is no slouch in the kitchen, either. So when he recently asked Santa for an Easy-Bake Oven, McKenna noticed that boys weren't featured anywhere in Hasbro's advertisements for the mini-oven. On top of that, it only came in two colors: purple and pink. Feeling burned by the suggestion that only girls bake, the budding activist decided to do something about it.</p><p>McKenna started a <a title="McKenna petition " href="http://www.change.org/petitions/hasbro-feature-boys-in-the-packaging-of-the-easy-bake-oven" target="_blank">petition</a> on Change.org calling on toy manufacturer Hasbro to tone down the gender-typing on the Easy-Bake Oven. The open letter to CEO Brian D. Goldner might feature a pretty adorable video of Gavyn talking about baking (and dinosaurs!), but it's not kidding around. In response to the frilly colorway for the oven, McKenna writes:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are women scared to call themselves feminists?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/why_are_women_scared_to_call_themselves_feminists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/why_are_women_scared_to_call_themselves_feminists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carla Bruni-Sarkozy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marissa Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa Leo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Katy Perry and Carla Bruni-Sarkozy proudly declare they're not feminists at a time we need them more than ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a glorious time to be a declared non-feminist. This weekend, Katy Perry accepted Billboard Woman of the Year award by announcing to the world, <a href="https://twitter.com/billboard/status/274593799739682817">"I am not a feminist, but I do believe in the strength of women."</a> Way to take home a prize for womankind there, Perry. And last month, the former supermodel/first lady of France Carla Bruni-Sarkozy declared in a magazine interview that <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/nicolas-sarkozy/9711607/Carla-Bruni-Sarkozy-apologises-for-clumsy-feminism-remarks.html ">"I'm not at all an active feminist. </a>On the contrary, I'm a bourgeois. I love family life, I love doing the same thing every day." Because you can't be bourgeois, love your family, or value stability and be a feminist. It's in the manifesto.</p><p>Bruni-Sarkozy added, "We don't need to be feminist in my generation." As a member of Bruni-Sarkozy's generation, let me address that. Ha! HA HA HA! No, we don't need feminism at all! Women over 40 are too <em>valued</em> and <em>respected </em>for that! They don't have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/hillary_clinton_does_not_have_time_for_your_games/">their looks scrutinized and mocked</a>; they don't face skepticism that they're <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/nancy-pelosi-chides-nbcs-luke-russert-for-asking-offensive-question-about-her-age/">too old to do their jobs</a>; they aren't the punch lines of garish jokes about predatory cougars. Ha ha ha!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/why_are_women_scared_to_call_themselves_feminists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/why_are_women_scared_to_call_themselves_feminists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>156</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox news column claims &#8220;women aren’t women anymore&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/fox_news_column_claims_women_aren%e2%80%99t_women_anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/fox_news_column_claims_women_aren%e2%80%99t_women_anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13107445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suzanne Venker argues that feminism has killed marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox news' Suzanne Venker has issued a <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/24/war-on-men/">groundbreaking opinion piece</a> in which she flips the script on the media's dialogue of  the "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/binders_full_of_offensive_rape_remarks/">war on women</a>," calling it, instead, the "war on men."  Venker argues that "feminists" (or simply women who pursue higher education and careers) are to blame for the "dearth of good men" because "women aren’t women anymore":</p><blockquote><p>It’s the women who lose. Not only are they saddled with the consequences of sex, by dismissing male nature they’re forever seeking a balanced life. The fact is, women need men’s linear career goals – they need men to pick up the slack at the office – in order to live the balanced life they seek.</p> <p>So if men today are slackers, and if they’re retreating from marriage en masse, women should look in the mirror and ask themselves what role they’ve played to bring about this transformation.</p></blockquote><p>But, "fortunately, there is good news," Suzanne Venker writes."Women have the power to turn everything around. All they have to do is surrender to their nature – their femininity – and let men surrender to theirs. If they do, marriageable men will come out of the woodwork."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/fox_news_column_claims_women_aren%e2%80%99t_women_anymore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/fox_news_column_claims_women_aren%e2%80%99t_women_anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I like to be objectified</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/i_like_to_be_objectified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/i_like_to_be_objectified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm independent, I'm a feminist, but I like men to tell me I'm just a sex object]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I'm a young, vibrant woman. A feminist, you could even say. I'm the first to speak out against a womanizer or misogynist. I sign petitions and spread the news about anti-women politicians. I believe in women's rights above anything else. I reject old ideas about gender roles or the customs surrounding them.</strong></p><p><strong>When I'm having sex, all I want is to be objectified.</strong></p><p><strong>It doesn't make any sense. It isn't as if I want a man I'm sleeping with to think I'm nothing more than something for him to use, but I do want him to tell me that. It's puzzling because, like I said, I would classify myself as a feminist. It makes me upset to think I might be just like all the other women out there who allow themselves to be nothing more than an object for men.</strong></p><p><strong>But I can't help what I want -- even if I don't really want it.</strong></p><p><strong>Why are my kinks so not in tune with the rest of my personality? I grew up feeling like the boys around me were all judging me in their heads, and that, for whatever reason, I wasn't good enough for them. I constantly felt -- and still feel, sometimes -- like I'm not good enough for the men I want relationships with. Could that be why my sexual kinks are so off? I'm so sensitive to sexism that I think my view of men has become skewed. </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/i_like_to_be_objectified/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/i_like_to_be_objectified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Walking Dead&#8221; has become a white patriarchy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/the_walking_dead_has_become_a_white_patriarchy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/the_walking_dead_has_become_a_white_patriarchy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Walking Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zombies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The post-apocalypse looks too familiar: White men rule, men of color are invisible -- and women are to be protected]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a crucial moment in the opening episode of "The Walking Dead" when we realize that everything has been erased, and if humankind is to survive, things are going to have to change. That moment comes after Sheriff Rick Grimes has been rescued by Morgan and Duane, an African-American father and son who have boarded themselves up in their home. Outside, the zombies — walkers — congregate at night, and Morgan's job is to keep Duane safe. When night comes, and the men hunker down, we watch as Morgan's walker-wife comes up the stairs and tries to let herself into the domestic sphere from which she has been banished. The doorknob turns and turns, and as Duane cries, Morgan reassures him, "That's not your mom. That's not your mom." The turning doorknob was featured in the credits for the first two seasons of the show, which caused me to think that gender and race would turn, too.</p><p>As I have watched "The Walking Dead," however, I have been disappointed to discover that, while the writers occasionally take a moment to comment on the state of gender — and of race — in this new world, in the end they leave these issues to die and reconstitute a world in which white men rule. Men of color are reduced to occupying a nebulous space, and women (with rare exception) are to be protected. Even more pernicious, any power that women have usually comes to them in the old-fashioned, stereotypical way of manipulating the men in their lives into doing what they want them to do.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/the_walking_dead_has_become_a_white_patriarchy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/the_walking_dead_has_become_a_white_patriarchy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chill out, it&#8217;s just a costume</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/chill_out_its_just_a_costume/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/chill_out_its_just_a_costume/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween Costumes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13058413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mocking oversexed Halloween outfits has become a feminist tradition. Maybe it's time we let it go]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> Every year, Halloween comes with its own predictable traditions: trick-or-treating, pumpkin recipes, costumes based on bad puns, and increasingly, the tradition of women wearing ever-skimpier Halloween costumes and feminists online decrying the trend through blogs and social networks. To quote the movie <em>Mean Girls</em>: “In Girl World, Halloween is the one night a year when a girl can dress like a total slut and no other girls can say anything about it.”</p><p>Mocking oversexed Halloween costumes is catnip to feminists. For one thing, it’s one of those arenas where the double standard is undeniable. Men’s costumes, at least those sold in Halloween stores, <a href="http://feministing.com/2012/10/24/favourite-new-tumblr-fuck-no-sexist-halloween-costumes/">tend to be basic scary costume fare</a>. Women’s costumes are so oversexed it gets silly. <a href="http://feministing.com/files/2012/10/bacon.jpg">Sexy bacon</a>? <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA19V0DW1031&amp;nm_mc=KNC-GoogleMKP&amp;cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleMKP-_-pla-_-NA-_-NA">Sexy Finding Nemo</a>? A <a href="http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbvdg1LEd31rith1uo2_250.png">sexy melon that is so sexy</a> you can’t even tell what it’s supposed to be?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/chill_out_its_just_a_costume/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/chill_out_its_just_a_costume/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Film critic Judith Crist: &#8220;We all have our stories&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/film_critic_judith_crist_we_all_have_our_stories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/film_critic_judith_crist_we_all_have_our_stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binders of women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binders Full of Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judith Crist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13045205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My mentor had no sympathy for my tale of sexual harassment because, for her, it was inherent in the workplace]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In August, the most hated woman in Hollywood passed away. At least that’s what she was called in her obituary in the L.A. Times. When she died at age 90, Judith Crist rolled the credits on a career as one of the most influential film critics in the U.S., regularly sending down often-crushing opinions via the New York Herald Tribune, New York magazine, TV Guide and the "Today Show." Crist was not in anyone’s binder in the mid-1900s. In an era where prominent female journalists couldn’t even fill a manila envelope, she was the whole damn file cabinet.</p><p>But I knew her as a powerful professor at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism, and she was one of my favorite teachers, even though she once delivered me a zing I’ve never forgotten — not on my writing, but on being too precious about sexual harassment.</p><p>This was the early '90s, and in her seminar, we read columnists like Russell Baker, William Safire, Calvin Trillin and Anna Quindlen. Each week, there was an assignment on a given topic: current events, a controversial issue in the news, an opinion about a new piece of architecture or an exhibit or restaurant. Her inflexible edict: You cannot write in the first person until the final class.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/film_critic_judith_crist_we_all_have_our_stories/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/film_critic_judith_crist_we_all_have_our_stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Rubin&#8217;s wacky notions of feminism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/jennifer_rubins_wacky_notions_of_feminism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/jennifer_rubins_wacky_notions_of_feminism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13044874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post writer's attack on Hillary Clinton over Benghazi reveals what a retrograde shill she really is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> Secretary Hillary Clinton took responsibility for <strong>the situation in Benghazi on Monday</strong>, noting to the press that the “president and the vice-president wouldn't be knowledgeable about specific decisions that are made by security professionals.” There are a number of appropriate reactions to this statement. One could assume it’s a bit of politicking during election season, an attempt to take the heat off the president and help his re-election bid. One could see it as a diplomatic move, aimed at quelling tensions in the Middle East. One could take it at face value. Or, one could lose her ever-loving mind and accuse Clinton of betraying feminism.</p><p>The last option was the one chosen by WaPo's Jennifer Rubin, whose writing has become synonymous with “mindless partisan bleating.” <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/10/16/1018651/washington-post-columnist-launches-sexist-diatribe-against-hillary-clinton-on-twitter/">Rubin responded to Clinton on Twitter</a> with some creative uses of punctuation:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/jennifer_rubins_wacky_notions_of_feminism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/jennifer_rubins_wacky_notions_of_feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Binders full of women&#8221;: The inevitable autotune</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/binders_full_of_women_the_inevitable_autotune/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/binders_full_of_women_the_inevitable_autotune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binders Full of Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autotune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13043569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now the meme is a song]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took less than 24 hours for these "binders full of women" mashups, autotunes and remixes to reach YouTube:</p><p>The "Binders full of Women" mashup:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tZ9SMVC8-C4" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>The "Binders full of Women" song:<br /> <iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qqMpANK_S78" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>The "Binders full of Women" rap:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/hvyuHvcj95A" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>"Binders full of Women," the Remix:</p><p><iframe src="http://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F63764013&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;auto_play=false&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;color=f2346d&amp;callback=reqwest_0&amp;_=1350500739114" frameborder="no" scrolling="no" width="100%" height="166"></iframe></p><p>"Binders full of Women" Dubstep:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9_bk54HayZY" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/binders_full_of_women_the_inevitable_autotune/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/binders_full_of_women_the_inevitable_autotune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney&#8217;s &#8220;binders full of women&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitt_romneys_binders_full_of_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitt_romneys_binders_full_of_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binders Full of Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13043106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The definitive slideshow: From Beyonce to Bill Clinton to John Cusack, Mitt's quest for qualified women made a meme]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A highlight of last night's town hall debate (at least for women) was when GOP hopeful Mitt Romney answered voter Katherine Fenton's question about women inequalities in the workplace. Romney's response had nothing to do with women's inequalities, but everything to do with his bizarre quest to find "qualified women" for his campaign, which apparently was so difficult that he had to collect "binders full" of those things called "women."</p><p>And thus, a meme was born:</p><p>[slide_show id=13043036]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitt_romneys_binders_full_of_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitt_romneys_binders_full_of_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paglia: Madonna&#8217;s protests are &#8220;gimmicky&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/paglia_madonnas_protests_are_gimmicky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/paglia_madonnas_protests_are_gimmicky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camille Paglia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joy behar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13041865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Glittering Images" author explains why Madonna's social statements lower her art]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In light of Madonna's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/15/madonna-strips-malala-yousafzai_n_1967872.html">recent striptease</a>, Salon contributing writer, art historian and critic <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/camille_paglias_glittering_images/">Camille Paglia</a> told "Say Anything!" host Joy Behar that <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/madonna/">the artist</a> "has lost her instinct for performance."</p><p><iframe src="http://current.com/bc/1902441300001?linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fcurrent.com%2Fshows%2Fjoy-behar%2Fvideos%2Fcamille-paglia-slams-madonnas-striptease-protest%2F" frameborder="0" width="480" height="270"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/paglia_madonnas_protests_are_gimmicky/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/paglia_madonnas_protests_are_gimmicky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>