<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 23:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Feminism didn&#8217;t kill men&#8217;s rights advocate Earl Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl Silverman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's Rights Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earl Silverman had his demons, and his pain must be taken seriously. But feminism isn't responsible for his death]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was a hero of the Men's Rights movement. Three years ago, Earl Silverman, a self-described long-term survivor of violence at the hands of an abusive wife, turned his own home into the Men's Alternative Safe House, Canada's first domestic abuse shelter for men and their children. On Friday, he was found hanging in its garage, <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/04/28/earl-silverman-who-ran-mens-safe-house-dies-in-apparent-suicide/">an apparent suicide. </a></p><p>Silverman had been going through a period of intense personal stress lately – his death came just one day after he packed up his recently sold home. Just last month, he'd closed the shelter because he could no longer afford to maintain it. He had said he was struggling to keep up with his heat and grocery bills.</p><p>In his dogged efforts to help men and to raise public awareness, Silverman worked to remove the stigma that can often prevent men from speaking out because of pride and fear and misunderstanding. Yet where Silverman came up short was in perpetuating the Men's Rights movement's fiction that there's any gender equity as far as violence and victims. The Calgary Herald recalled, in its coverage of his death, Silverman's oft-repeated insistence that <a href="http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/rights+supporters+mourn+loss+advocate/8307690/story.html">"men are about as likely as women to say they have been the victims of domestic abuse."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>263</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Michael Pollan a sexist pig?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_michael_pollan_a_sexist_pig/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_michael_pollan_a_sexist_pig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Pollan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slow food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betty Friedan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Femivores" have made DIY domesticity cool. But critics who blame feminism for obesity and fast food have it wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My grandmother, a 1960s housewife of the cigarette-in-one-hand-cocktail-in-the-other variety, thought a slab of frozen Sara Lee pound cake was a totally appropriate breakfast for her children. My mother, a busy working baby boomer, was a serviceable cook who mostly just wanted to get something healthy into her three kids’ bellies before bath time. This meant lots of cheese quesadillas, rotisserie chickens from the Kroger, and “face plates”—slices of banana, mini chicken sausages, olives, and the like, arranged like smiley faces. We loved those. Now divorced and in her fifties, she says she’s “done” cooking and happily subsists on granola bars and apples and hard-boiled eggs.</p><p>As for me, I’ve been learning to can jam, bake bread from scratch in my Dutch oven (though my husband is better at it), and make my own tomato sauce from a bushel of ugly tomatoes I bought at the farmer’s market.</p><p>My grandmother, were she not dead (the cigarettes), would no doubt look at me like I’m crazy.</p><p>“Don’t you know that you can buy that stuff ?” she’d ask.</p><p>But it’s not about buying stuff these days, it’s about making it (if you’re middle-class, liberal, and white, that is). Homemade, from scratch, DIY, straight from the backyard, fresh baked, artisan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_michael_pollan_a_sexist_pig/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_michael_pollan_a_sexist_pig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear famous actresses: Your looks scare me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What have you all done to yourselves? I've loved you for decades, but your plastic features are freaking me out  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, lady. You, lady. Beloved celebrity of my generation, icon with a career spanning decades. I saw a story about you today and I was excited, because I've always been your fan. Then I looked at it. And I just want to know one thing. <em>Girl, what the eff have you done to your face?</em></p><p>I've tried to ignore it. I've tried not to say anything. Not just to you, today, but to lots of female celebrities, for years. I want to believe that if you were to go out and get a tattoo that said "I LOVE CHEESE" across your forehead, I would support your right to do whatever makes you happy. And as someone who keeps a stock of hair color in her closet in case there's ever a Feriapocalypse, and who doesn't own an item of makeup or moisturizer that doesn't boldly feature the word "youth" on the packaging, I'm not one to espouse growing older gracefully. I'd never sell anybody on the nobility of looking like you just stepped out of <a href="http://www.moma.org/collection/browse_results.php?criteria=O%3AAD%3AE%3A3373&amp;page_number=5&amp;template_id=1&amp;sort_order=1">a Dorothea Lange photograph</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israeli court: Women can wear prayer shawls while worshiping at the Western Wall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/israeli_court_women_can_wear_prayer_shawls_while_worshipping_at_the_western_wall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/israeli_court_women_can_wear_prayer_shawls_while_worshipping_at_the_western_wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthodox Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women of the wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court ruled that women may pray freely at the Wall, overruling Orthodox tradition enforced at the holy site ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a major victory for feminist religious group Women of the Wall (and for all women who want to worship freely at one of Judaism's holiest sites), an Israeli court ruled on Thursday that women could pray at the Western Wall while wearing prayer shawls.</p><p>The decision comes after a series of clashes between female worshipers and the Orthodox rabbis who manage the Wall according to a strict interpretation of Jewish law. The rabbis' enforcement of Orthodox tradition barred women from wearing tallit (prayer shawls), reading aloud from the Torah and entering certain areas around the Wall, all of which significantly restrict women’s ability to pray. Women were often <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/feminists_and_ultra_orthodox_rabbis_clash_at_the_western_wall/" target="_blank">arrested</a> for defying these restrictions.</p><p>But the court ruled on Thursday that their presence did not pose a threat and did not violate "local custom," as the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/israeli-court-allows-non-orthodox-prayer-by-women-at-western-wall/2013/04/25/92be77e6-add7-11e2-98ef-d1072ed3cc27_story.html" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/israeli_court_women_can_wear_prayer_shawls_while_worshipping_at_the_western_wall/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/israeli_court_women_can_wear_prayer_shawls_while_worshipping_at_the_western_wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pictures of people who mock me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/pictures_of_people_who_mock_me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/pictures_of_people_who_mock_me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years, strangers have made fun of me for being fat. But I got my power back -- by turning the camera on them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was traveling with students in Barcelona in the summer of 2011, walking through La Rambla, when I noticed two guys making fun of me. I could see them in the reflection of a mirrored building, making gestures with their hands to suggest how much bigger I was than the thin girl standing next to me, her small waist accentuated by her crop top and cut-off shorts. They painted her figure in the air like an hourglass. Then they painted my shape like the convex curves of a ball. The guys were saying something, too, but there was only one word I could make out: <em>Gorda</em>. Fat woman.</p><p>I’ve been hearing comments like this for much all my life. Maybe someone else would have yelled at them, or shrunk inside. But I don’t get upset when this happens.</p><p>I pulled out my camera, and set up a shoot.</p><p>For about a year, I’d been taking pictures of strangers’ reactions to me in public for a series I called “Wait Watchers.” I was interested in capturing something I already knew firsthand: If the large women in historical art pieces were walking around today, they would be scorned and ridiculed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/pictures_of_people_who_mock_me/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/pictures_of_people_who_mock_me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>331</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are female-friendly gyms sexist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Londoner sues over women-only hours and gets called a jerk and a "limey nutsack." But he might have a fair point]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a club has a policy of regularly excluding one gender, would you automatically assume it's being sexist? What if the group being shut out is guys?</p><p>That's the question that has set British gym shorts in a proverbial twist in recent weeks, after a man decided to sue London's Kentish Town Sports Centre for offering 442 hours a year for women-only hours.</p><p>Writing last week in the Daily Mail, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2311098/Peter-Lloyd-Why-Im-suing-gym-sexist-women-hours.html#ixzz2RI9kvgaK ">patron Peter Lloyd explained his beef</a> with the gym, noting that "they still charge them the same full-price membership fee as women, but refuse to offer the equivalent option of male-only sessions." Jezebel promptly labeled Lloyd a "jerk," who should <a href="http://jezebel.com/jackass-suing-his-gym-for-their-442-women-only-hours-pe-476604412">"give us our 442 hours a year and stop crying."</a> Wonkette, meanwhile, less charitably referred to him as a <a href="http://wonkette.com/513321/human-rights-hero-sues-sexist-gym-because-of-ladies-only-yoga-classes">"Limey nutsack." </a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margaret Cho: Babies scare me more than anything</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still don't know if I want children. Frankly, I'm not sure I ever want to love anything that much]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">I don’t have children, and I am not sure if I have wanted them or never wanted them. It’s weird not to be able to decide. Kids are great, and many of my friends now have almost-grown-up kids, like in their late teens and early 20s, and I see these tall beings I once held in my arms, and I am alarmed, amused, and I want to cry, just for the passage of time and how it grows us like plants. I think about how, during all these years they’ve grown up, I must have grown down. That’s awful to realize.</p><p dir="ltr">Korean children get a lot of fuss made over them, I guess because life was tough in the old country, and it was a big deal if you survived. There’s a big party thrown when you are 100 days old, followed by another when you make it to one whole year. My parents took a lot of pictures of me at these parties, although I don’t remember a thing as I was really drunk at both. From the pictures I see the cake, though — all these big multicolored rice cakes, each pastel stripe a steamed layer of pounded and steamed rice flour, not sweet like birthday cake but a delicious treat all the same. It looks like a chewy Neapolitan ice cream, or a gay pride flag made of carbs. It’s the best and I want it, but I think wanting that cake isn’t enough reason to have a baby.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gabrielle Reece: I choose to serve my husband</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabby Reece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laird Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Reece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The volleyball star knows what's "truly" feminine. It's a strange definition]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up is down. Black is white. And, according to Gabby Reece, submissive is strong.</p><p>In an interview Friday on the <a href="http://www.today.com/news/gabby-reece-women-being-submissive-sign-strength-1C9322181">"Today"</a> show, Reece, who is married to surfing superstar Laird Hamilton, discussed her new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451692668/?tag=saloncom08-20">"My Foot Is Too Big for the Glass Slipper"</a> and went at least a few shades of grey by declaring her submissiveness.</p><p>Reece, who was OF COURSE introduced as a "mother, model and former pro beach volleyball star" <em>in that order,</em> explains in the book, "to truly be feminine means being soft, receptive and – look out, here it comes – submissive."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melissa Harris-Perry doesn&#8217;t want to steal your children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa Harris-Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Caller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Faludi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MSNBC host stirred up a tempest -- but she was right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melissa Harris-Perry thought it was, in her words, <a href="http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/04/09/why-caring-for-children-is-not-just-a-parents-job/">"an uncontroversial comment."</a> But when the MSNBC host and political commenter made a "Lean forward" spot for the network in which she made the bold wish "for Americans to see children as everyone’s responsibility," the conservative spin machine went into extra-frothy mode.</p><p>"We have never invested as much in public education as we should have," she says in the spot. "We haven't had a very collective notion of, these are our children. We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to whole communities. Once it's everybody's responsibility and not just the household's, we start making better investments."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>175</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a more egalitarian Western Wall coming soon?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/is_a_more_egalitarian_western_wall_coming_soon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/is_a_more_egalitarian_western_wall_coming_soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthodox Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women of the wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A compromise between Jewish women and ultra-Orthodox rabbis over prayer at the sacred spot is in the works ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For months, chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel Natan Sharansky has been working to broker a compromise between Jewish women who want to pray at Jerusalem’s Western Wall and the ultra-Orthodox rabbis who have called their presence an “abomination.”</p><p>And a compromise may be on its way, as Jane Eisner at Forward <a href="http://forward.com/articles/174503/sharansky-to-propose-egalitarian-section-at-the-ko/#ixzz2PzYcvLeW">reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>If implemented, the proposal, a product of months of deliberation, would mark a dramatic acknowledgement by the state of Israel that prayer at the Wall — regarded as Judaism’s holiest site and a modern-day symbol of national sovereignty — should include non-Orthodox practice in which men and women pray together. But it is uncertain whether the proposal will satisfy Women of the Wall, who for years have tried to hold full prayer services in the women’s only section and may see this compromise as a betrayal of their mission...</p> <p>Under the proposal, sources said, the area now known as Robinson’s Arch on the southern end of the Wall will be greatly expanded to create a prayer space roughly equivalent to the existing men’s and women’s sections. Egalitarian prayer is currently permitted at the Arch, which is an archaeological site, but that prayer is only available at limited times and with an entrance fee. The expectation is that the enlarged space would be free and open around the clock, as the Kotel is now, but that could not be confirmed.</p> <p>The plan also calls for the plaza surrounding the Wall to expand, so that visitors approaching the site in the Old City could clearly chose between praying at the egalitarian section, or the existing sections reserved only for men and for women. Still under discussion is governance of the new prayer area, but several sources said that they thought it would be run by something other than the Western Wall Heritage Foundation, the organization that currently controls the Kotel.</p></blockquote><p>Women of the Wall head Anat Hoffman has signed off on the proposal while expressing her reservations about its "separate but equal" premise, but the measure still requires approval from the Netanyahu government, "where it may face resistance from Orthodox groups unwilling to share authority over the holy site," Eisner notes.</p><p>h/t <a href="http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/128919/an-egalitarian-section-at-the-western-wall" target="_blank">Adam Chandler at Tablet Magazine</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/is_a_more_egalitarian_western_wall_coming_soon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/is_a_more_egalitarian_western_wall_coming_soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thatcher: A female icon, but not a feminist one</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's better to have women in public life, even those with whom we disagree, than no women in public life at all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have always been women like Margaret Thatcher in power. Never more than one or two at a time, of course. Thatcher was the embodiment of what Katha Pollitt memorably <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1991/04/07/magazine/hers-the-smurfette-principle.html?pagewanted=all&amp;src=pm">called</a> "the Smurfette syndrome," which is when "a group of male buddies will be accented by a lone female, stereotypically defined." She was not a feminist icon, nor any kind of feminist, as she took pains to remind people. "Some of us were making it before women's lib was even thought of," she once sniffed. To make it any more obvious, she might as well have literally kicked the ladder out from under her.</p><p>For decades, Thatcher's gender provided some public relations cover for her most noxious politics. That was true even today in the White House's statement on her death, which included the following treacly sentence: "As a grocer’s daughter who rose to become Britain’s first female prime minister, she stands as an example to our daughters that there is no glass ceiling that can’t be shattered."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;m not a feminist, but&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13263079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These forces of nature may "run the world," but they won't cop to the F-bomb]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">Beyoncé's fierceness <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/twitter_suspects_beyonce_fierceness_caused_super_bowl_blackout/" target="_blank">practically blew the lights</a> out at the Super Bowl this year. Madonna's decades-long career choices have landed her on the Catholic Church's <em>and</em> the Kremlin's <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-398931/Vaticans-fury-Madonna-blasphemy.html" target="_blank">enemies</a> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2190670/Madonna-sued-millions-Russians-offended-support-gay-rights-concert.html" target="_blank">list</a>. Sandra Day O'Connor was responsible for crucial votes in Supreme Court rulings on abortion and affirmative action. These are women who are virtual forces of nature, whether or not you agree with them on every issue.</p><p dir="ltr">So why does the word "feminist" scare them so? Don't they know that, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/why_are_women_scared_to_call_themselves_feminists/" target="_blank">per Salon's Mary Elizabeth Williams</a>: "If you believe in the strength of women ... you’re soaking in feminism"?</p><p dir="ltr">A list of other high-profile, force-of-nature women who may "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmMU_iwe6U" target="_blank">run the world</a>," but won't cop to the F-bomb.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyoncé&#8217;s reluctant feminism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/beyonces_reluctant_feminism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/beyonces_reluctant_feminism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carla Bruni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mrs. Jay-Z is concerned about an "extreme" label]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should come as no surprise that Beyoncé calls herself a feminist. She's self-made, successful and possesses a song catalog that reads like a lady empowerment playlist. What's unusual is the lengths to which Ms. Sasha Fierce herself will go to walk back that simple statement.</p><p>In <a href="http://www.independent.ie/woman/beyonce-is-a-modernday-feminist-29171853.html">a new interview with British Vogue</a>, the 31-year-old hedged when asked if she considers herself a feminist. "That word can be very extreme," she said, before acknowledging, "I guess I am a modern-day feminist. I do believe in equality." Unlike those old-school feminists who are totally opposed to equality, that's what I <em>guess</em>. Beyoncé went on to explain, "I do believe in equality and that we have a way to go and it's something that's pushed aside and something that we have been conditioned to accept. But I'm happily married. I love my husband. I feel like Mrs. Carter is who I am, but more bold and more fearless than I've ever been."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/beyonces_reluctant_feminism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/beyonces_reluctant_feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Journal gets a D in feminism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/wall_street_journal_gets_a_d_in_feminism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/wall_street_journal_gets_a_d_in_feminism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suzy Lee Weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Taranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Patton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In two ridiculous recent stories, the paper brushes off women and their college aspirations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just in from the Wall Street Journal: It's so cute when girls want to go college. Bonus: That's where the husbands are! The paper of record for rich white men has been taking an active interest in the matriculation habits of females of late, and the impression it would like you to have sure isn't one that suggests anything resembling academic ambition or intellectual qualification.</p><p>First, there was the head-scratchingly nonsensical, <a href="http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/01/elizabeth-wurtzel-on-self-help.html">Liz Wurtzel-level self-indulgent</a> tantrum that the paper ran over the weekend, by high school senior Suzy Lee Weiss. Weiss' qualifications for gaining the editorial real estate for an open letter <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324000704578390340064578654.html?">"To (All) the Colleges That Rejected Me"</a> in the Journal? Being the <a href="https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/318407027368017920">"sassy" sister</a> of former Wall Street Journal editorial features editor Bari Weiss, and having a conniption that she "failed to get into the colleges" of her dreams.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/wall_street_journal_gets_a_d_in_feminism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/wall_street_journal_gets_a_d_in_feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the gender revolution over?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/has_the_gender_revolution_reached_its_peak_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/has_the_gender_revolution_reached_its_peak_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Sandberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne-Marie Slaughter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of women in the workforce is declining, suggesting that many are redefining what it means to have it all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bostonreview.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/title-e1356145289357.jpeg" alt="Boston Review" align="left" /></a></p><p>Nothing transformed American lives in the last century more than the gender revolution. The empowerment of women redefined courtship, sex, marriage, and child-rearing. Women’s entry into the paid workforce, in particular, upended the bourgeois Victorian family model in which he battles in the marketplace and she nurtures in the home. In 1950 about one in five married women went off to work; in 2000 about three in five did. Now, after decades of such astonishing change, the gender revolution appears over—before its completion.</p><p>Last summer, Anne-Marie Slaughter, a former high-flyer in the State Department, wrote a declaration of dependence, “Why Women Can’t Have it All,” which stirred up blogo-pandemonium. She argued that the gender revolution will never be completely won, because the emotional tug of family on women is too great, and the domestic urge of husbands is too slight. Then Marissa Mayer, the new head of Yahoo, returned to the office only two weeks after giving birth. “The baby’s been way easier than everyone made it out to be,” she proudly announced, signaling, to the outrage of struggling mothers that, for her at least, the revolution had already succeeded.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/has_the_gender_revolution_reached_its_peak_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/has_the_gender_revolution_reached_its_peak_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saudi Arabia lifts ban on women riding bicycles</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/saudi_arabia_lifts_ban_on_women_riding_bicycles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/saudi_arabia_lifts_ban_on_women_riding_bicycles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new policy stipulates that women must be accompanied by a male guardian and ride "only for entertainment" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women in Saudi Arabia are still banned from driving cars (<a href="http://www.hrw.org/world-report-2012/world-report-2012-saudi-arabia" target="_blank">among other things</a>), but the kingdom's religious police are now allowing them to ride motorbikes and bicycles in certain parks and recreational areas. The catch? A male relative or guardian must accompany women riders, according to Saudi news outlet Al-Yawm.</p><p>As <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/saudi-religious-police-lift-ban-women-bikes-18852363#.UVmFy6sjpLw" target="_blank">reported</a> by the Associated Press:</p><blockquote><p>The Al-Yawm daily on Monday cited an unnamed official from the powerful religious police as saying women can ride bikes in parks and recreational areas but they have to be accompanied by a male relative and dressed in the full Islamic head-to-toe abaya.</p> <p>Saudi Arabia follows an ultraconservative interpretation of Islam and bans women from driving. Women are also banned from riding motorcycles or bicycles in public places. The newspaper didn't say what triggered the lifting of the ban.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/saudi_arabia_lifts_ban_on_women_riding_bicycles/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/saudi_arabia_lifts_ban_on_women_riding_bicycles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can women over 50 &#8220;lean in&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/is_leaning_in_an_option_for_women_over_50_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/is_leaning_in_an_option_for_women_over_50_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feministing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Sandberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lean In]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sheryl Sandberg's advice is well-intentioned, but it doesn't apply to older women who wish to reenter the workforce]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest post from Tira Harpaz. Harpaz is a graduate of Princeton University and Fordham Law School and the mother of three children. She was formerly a Senior Attorney at Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell, and she is currently the founder and president of CollegeBound Advice, an independent college counseling firm.  This is her first article for Feministing.</em><br /> <a href="http://www.feministing.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/feministing_logo-1.jpg" alt="Feministing" /></a></p><p><em>Lean In</em>. It seems like everyone is talking, blogging or arguing about it. Sheryl Sandberg’s well-written, chatty, and informative book purports to give useful advice for women of all age brackets, “from those who are just starting out to those who are taking a break and may want to jump back in.” However, Sandberg seems to miss the mark for a certain segment of the female population: my demographic, the 50- to 60-ish mom who either gave up her career to stay home with her kids or reduced her workload during their formative years, and is now looking to re-enter the workforce or ramp up her job.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/is_leaning_in_an_option_for_women_over_50_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/is_leaning_in_an_option_for_women_over_50_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My bad sex wasn&#8217;t rape</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/my_bad_sex_wasnt_rape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/my_bad_sex_wasnt_rape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The outcry over a recent "Girls" episode startled me. What happened to a woman's sexual agency?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thirty-some summers ago, when I was 15, I lost my virginity to a boy who didn’t care a bit about my emotional well-being. He was very popular, on his way to college in the fall, and sleeping with any girl who would spread her legs to have sex with him that summer.</p><p>Two weeks after we had sex for the first time, he and I and his best friend got drunk — me for the first time in my life — and I ended up having sex in a park with both of them. It was somewhat miserable for me to have sex consecutively with two young men, ages 17 and 19, and to hear the second one ask, in the midst of intercourse, “Are you using birth control?” and quickly add, “Oh, who cares — if you get pregnant, it’s your fault,” and to have my bra and panties left behind on the grass when they drove me home. I was shaken both by the degrading nature of the incident and by the fact that I had allowed it. But allow it, I did.  Was I raped? No. Did I ever for one second think that maybe I had been raped? No.</p><p>Many would disagree.</p><p style="text-align: center;">* * *</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/my_bad_sex_wasnt_rape/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/my_bad_sex_wasnt_rape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>403</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mormon women may lead prayer for first time at LDS General Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/mormon_women_may_lead_prayer_for_first_time_at_lds_general_conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/mormon_women_may_lead_prayer_for_first_time_at_lds_general_conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormonism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Mormon Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminist mormons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A campaign calling on church leaders to "let women pray" may have moved the church to action ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="https://www.change.org/organizations/let_women_pray_at_general_conference" target="_blank">campaign</a> to allow women to give the opening or closing prayer at the Mormon Church's General Conference may just have made history.</p><p>According to a report from the Salt Lake Tribune, women are currently scheduled to offer invocations or benedictions at the church’s April conference -- a first for the faith.</p><p>The activists behind "Let Women Pray in General Conference" called on LDS members to write letters to six high-ranking church officials, asking them to remember former church president Spencer Kimball's edict that “there is no scriptural prohibition against sisters offering prayers” and it is “permissible for sisters to offer prayers in any meetings they attend” when scheduling the opening and closing speakers for the General Conference.</p><p>Women have been regularly asked to speak at the conference over the last two decades, but there is no record in the church's history of a woman leading the opening or closing prayers. Church spokesman Scott Trotter wouldn't confirm the speaker lineup, but told the Tribune that "decisions on speakers and prayers at General Conference were made many weeks ago."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/mormon_women_may_lead_prayer_for_first_time_at_lds_general_conference/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/mormon_women_may_lead_prayer_for_first_time_at_lds_general_conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nancy Pelosi: We need more women in politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/nancy_pelosi_we_need_to_make_our_own_environment_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/nancy_pelosi_we_need_to_make_our_own_environment_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feministing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House Minority Leader discusses feminism, Nancy Drew and how we can create an environment that empowers women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.feministing.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/feministing_logo-1.jpg" alt="Feministing" /></a></p><p>Nancy Pelosi is the first woman in history to serve as Speaker of the House, aka the next person in the Presidential line of succession after the Vice President. She was Speaker from 2007 until 2011, and is now the Minority Leader.</p><p>Before she was Speaker, a role in which she was crucial to the passage of the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), she was also the first woman in history to serve as Minority Whip. She also served on the House intelligence and appropriations committees. She’s been in electoral politics longer than I’ve been on the planet, and she has five kids. She’s pro-choice, has a 0% rating from the NRA, and doesn’t take any shit from anyone. She’s a 72-year-old badass. Oh, and she <em>loves</em> chocolate milkshakes.</p><p>We spoke earlier this week, a few hours before President Obama signed the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act into law.</p><p>This woman barely needs an introduction, which is why this one is so short, so now, without further ado, the Feministing Five, with Nancy Pelosi.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/nancy_pelosi_we_need_to_make_our_own_environment_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/nancy_pelosi_we_need_to_make_our_own_environment_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>