<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:38:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with Disney princesses?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney princesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A small victory for Merida doesn't change the company's dysfunctional branding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's one thing you can count on Disney for, it's creating strong leading female characters in its movies – and then reducing them to wide-eyed idiots in their merchandising. The Belle who obsessed on books and the Tiana who scrimped and saved for her own restaurant, the warrior Mulan and the wise Pocahontas – they've all been reduced to flowing hair and off-the-shoulder dresses and coy looks in their post-cinematic incarnations. But when the mouse tried to give its "Brave" heroine Merida a "Stepford Wives" makeover, it finally went too far.</p><p>Last week, Disney announced that it was adding the headstrong, flame-haired heroine to its "Princess" collection. But it was the revamped image of Merida -- her waist nipped, her eyes elongated, her messy tangle of hair a sexy tumble, her plain dress a shimmer of bling and her trademark bow and arrow nowhere to be seen – that set parents' jaws dropping. Disney blandly told Yahoo Shine that <a href="http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/disney-princess-makeover-sparks-outrage--merida-petition-goes-viral-175251230.html ">"Merida exemplifies what it means to be a Disney Princess</a> through being brave, passionate, and confident and she remains the same strong and determined Merida from the movie whose inner qualities have inspired moms and daughters around the world." But it didn't quell the disgust.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antiabortionists prey on minority women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/anti_abortionists_prey_on_minority_women_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/anti_abortionists_prey_on_minority_women_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Abortionists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new missionary campaign paints blacks and Latinos as the victims of feminists and corrupt healthcare providers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.colorlines.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://arc.org/images/stories/logos_pr_kit/colorlines_logo_screen_rez.gif" alt="Colorlines.com" width="150" /></a> Last December, Care Net—the nation’s largest network of evangelical Christian crisis pregnancy centers—featured a birth announcement of sorts on the website of its 10-year-old <a href="http://careneturban.org/about/">Urban Initiative</a>. Under the headline, “Plans Underway for Care Net’s Newest Center in Kansas City, Mo.!” a block of upbeat text described how a predominantly white, suburban nonprofit called Rachel House had “made contact” with “various African American pastors and community leaders,” who helped them “plant” a “pregnancy resource center” in a predominantly black, poor section of downtown Kansas City.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/anti_abortionists_prey_on_minority_women_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/anti_abortionists_prey_on_minority_women_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There will never be another Barbara Walters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/there_will_never_be_another_barbara_walters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/there_will_never_be_another_barbara_walters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Walters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Today Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The retiring veteran newswoman set the gold standard for female journalists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara Walters is ready for a different view -- but not just yet. On Monday, the 83-year-old newswoman officially announced that she will retire in 2014.</p><p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-barbara-walters-retires-20130513,0,288355.story">"</a><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-barbara-walters-retires-20130513,0,288355.story">I do not want to appear on another program or climb another mountain,"</a> she explained in a weekend statement. "I want instead to sit on a sunny field and admire the very gifted women — and OK, some men too — who will be taking my place." But Barbara Walters, if nobody's managed to take your place yet, what makes you think it'll happen now?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/there_will_never_be_another_barbara_walters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/there_will_never_be_another_barbara_walters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Mother&#8217;s Day outlived its purpose?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/has_mothers_day_outlived_its_purpose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/has_mothers_day_outlived_its_purpose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American families look different. Mother's Day often brings a picket-fence nostalgia in mind, and that must change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As my four-year-old is busy arguing with me about why she should be able to color on her breakfast cereal and I’m busy trying not to kill her, it can be hard to remember that Mother’s Day began as a call for world peace.</p><p>And at the same time, as the world around us seems to change more often than my daughter changes outfits, it can be hard to not lump Mother’s Day with some nostalgic, soft-focus-sense of June Cleaver as the idealized mother image toward which we all strive.</p><p>Somewhere between the good and bad of modern society lies the real Mother’s Day — in which we must simultaneously celebrate the wonderful diversity of families in the 21st century while condemning the real violence and harm done to so many of those families every day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/has_mothers_day_outlived_its_purpose/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/has_mothers_day_outlived_its_purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women worshippers attacked by ultra-Orthodox men at Western Wall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/women_worshippers_attacked_by_ultra_orthodox_men_at_western_wall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/women_worshippers_attacked_by_ultra_orthodox_men_at_western_wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women of the wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthodox Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Men of the conservative Haredi sect threw garbage, spit at and verbally harassed women at the Jewish holy site ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A group of male Haredi protestors at Jerusalem's Western Wall on Friday morning spit, threw garbage and shouted abuse at the Women of the Wall, a feminist group of female worshippers. In addition to injuries sustained by the praying women, two police officers were treated at the scene. The incident ended with the arrest of three of the ultra-Orthodox men.</p><p>The Jewish holy site has been a scene of reoccurring unrest as women defend their right to worship freely. As Salon previously <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/israeli_court_women_can_wear_prayer_shawls_while_worshipping_at_the_western_wall/" target="_blank">noted</a>, an Israeli court ruled last month that there was no halachik (legal interpretation of the Talmud) reason to prevent women from praying at the holy site while wearing prayer shawls and reading aloud from the Torah</p><p>But the court ruling has not put an end to clashes between female worshipers and Israel's ultra-Orthodox community, as the Jerusalem Post <a href="http://www.jpost.com/National-News/Thousands-of-haredim-protest-Women-of-Wall-prayer-312747" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/women_worshippers_attacked_by_ultra_orthodox_men_at_western_wall/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/women_worshippers_attacked_by_ultra_orthodox_men_at_western_wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s latest unfunny trend: #killallmen</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/twitters_latest_unfunny_trend_killallmen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/twitters_latest_unfunny_trend_killallmen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#killallmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A satire turns into a serious conversation -- but mostly it's an excuse for both sexes to be obnoxious]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why we can't have nice things: Every day, plenty of nice, reasonably normal women are already tired from defending the word "feminism" from the angry, annoying trolls who think that acknowledging sexism means misandry. And then we wake up and see that <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23killallmen&amp;src=tyah">#killallmen</a> is trending on Twitter, and we just want to turn this car around until everybody can behave themselves.</p><p>I swear to God, no ice cream for anybody today, Twitter.</p><p>Nobody really thinks a hashtag is a serious call to genocide. One doesn't go looking for great pearls of wisdom in a form whose crowning achievement is the motivational #risenandgrind, either. And Twitter is already a reliably rich trove of trending topics that are <a href="http://www.badreputation.org.uk/2011/02/02/why-are-trending-topic-hashtags-so-sexist-part-1/">openly hostile to females</a>, usually employing some version of the word "slut."  I fully believe that if we could convert all the misogyny on Twitter into a fuel source, we could reverse climate change in one hour. But there's nothing quite like gleeful shoe-on-the-other-foot bullying disguised as satire to give the most tiresome elements of the men's right's lobby – <a href="http://jezebel.com/rape-and-death-threats-what-mens-rights-activists-rea-476882099">and they are legion</a> -- fuel for their own self-righteous sense of victimhood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/twitters_latest_unfunny_trend_killallmen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/twitters_latest_unfunny_trend_killallmen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminism didn&#8217;t kill men&#8217;s rights advocate Earl Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl Silverman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's Rights Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earl Silverman had his demons, and his pain must be taken seriously. But feminism isn't responsible for his death]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was a hero of the Men's Rights movement. Three years ago, Earl Silverman, a self-described long-term survivor of violence at the hands of an abusive wife, turned his own home into the Men's Alternative Safe House, Canada's first domestic abuse shelter for men and their children. On Friday, he was found hanging in its garage, <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/04/28/earl-silverman-who-ran-mens-safe-house-dies-in-apparent-suicide/">an apparent suicide. </a></p><p>Silverman had been going through a period of intense personal stress lately – his death came just one day after he packed up his recently sold home. Just last month, he'd closed the shelter because he could no longer afford to maintain it. He had said he was struggling to keep up with his heat and grocery bills.</p><p>In his dogged efforts to help men and to raise public awareness, Silverman worked to remove the stigma that can often prevent men from speaking out because of pride and fear and misunderstanding. Yet where Silverman came up short was in perpetuating the Men's Rights movement's fiction that there's any gender equity as far as violence and victims. The Calgary Herald recalled, in its coverage of his death, Silverman's oft-repeated insistence that <a href="http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/rights+supporters+mourn+loss+advocate/8307690/story.html">"men are about as likely as women to say they have been the victims of domestic abuse."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>269</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Michael Pollan a sexist pig?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_michael_pollan_a_sexist_pig/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_michael_pollan_a_sexist_pig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Pollan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slow food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betty Friedan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Femivores" have made DIY domesticity cool. But critics who blame feminism for obesity and fast food have it wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My grandmother, a 1960s housewife of the cigarette-in-one-hand-cocktail-in-the-other variety, thought a slab of frozen Sara Lee pound cake was a totally appropriate breakfast for her children. My mother, a busy working baby boomer, was a serviceable cook who mostly just wanted to get something healthy into her three kids’ bellies before bath time. This meant lots of cheese quesadillas, rotisserie chickens from the Kroger, and “face plates”—slices of banana, mini chicken sausages, olives, and the like, arranged like smiley faces. We loved those. Now divorced and in her fifties, she says she’s “done” cooking and happily subsists on granola bars and apples and hard-boiled eggs.</p><p>As for me, I’ve been learning to can jam, bake bread from scratch in my Dutch oven (though my husband is better at it), and make my own tomato sauce from a bushel of ugly tomatoes I bought at the farmer’s market.</p><p>My grandmother, were she not dead (the cigarettes), would no doubt look at me like I’m crazy.</p><p>“Don’t you know that you can buy that stuff ?” she’d ask.</p><p>But it’s not about buying stuff these days, it’s about making it (if you’re middle-class, liberal, and white, that is). Homemade, from scratch, DIY, straight from the backyard, fresh baked, artisan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_michael_pollan_a_sexist_pig/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_michael_pollan_a_sexist_pig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear famous actresses: Your looks scare me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What have you all done to yourselves? I've loved you for decades, but your plastic features are freaking me out  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, lady. You, lady. Beloved celebrity of my generation, icon with a career spanning decades. I saw a story about you today and I was excited, because I've always been your fan. Then I looked at it. And I just want to know one thing. <em>Girl, what the eff have you done to your face?</em></p><p>I've tried to ignore it. I've tried not to say anything. Not just to you, today, but to lots of female celebrities, for years. I want to believe that if you were to go out and get a tattoo that said "I LOVE CHEESE" across your forehead, I would support your right to do whatever makes you happy. And as someone who keeps a stock of hair color in her closet in case there's ever a Feriapocalypse, and who doesn't own an item of makeup or moisturizer that doesn't boldly feature the word "youth" on the packaging, I'm not one to espouse growing older gracefully. I'd never sell anybody on the nobility of looking like you just stepped out of <a href="http://www.moma.org/collection/browse_results.php?criteria=O%3AAD%3AE%3A3373&amp;page_number=5&amp;template_id=1&amp;sort_order=1">a Dorothea Lange photograph</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israeli court: Women can wear prayer shawls while worshiping at the Western Wall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/israeli_court_women_can_wear_prayer_shawls_while_worshipping_at_the_western_wall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/israeli_court_women_can_wear_prayer_shawls_while_worshipping_at_the_western_wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthodox Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women of the wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court ruled that women may pray freely at the Wall, overruling Orthodox tradition enforced at the holy site ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a major victory for feminist religious group Women of the Wall (and for all women who want to worship freely at one of Judaism's holiest sites), an Israeli court ruled on Thursday that women could pray at the Western Wall while wearing prayer shawls.</p><p>The decision comes after a series of clashes between female worshipers and the Orthodox rabbis who manage the Wall according to a strict interpretation of Jewish law. The rabbis' enforcement of Orthodox tradition barred women from wearing tallit (prayer shawls), reading aloud from the Torah and entering certain areas around the Wall, all of which significantly restrict women’s ability to pray. Women were often <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/feminists_and_ultra_orthodox_rabbis_clash_at_the_western_wall/" target="_blank">arrested</a> for defying these restrictions.</p><p>But the court ruled on Thursday that their presence did not pose a threat and did not violate "local custom," as the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/israeli-court-allows-non-orthodox-prayer-by-women-at-western-wall/2013/04/25/92be77e6-add7-11e2-98ef-d1072ed3cc27_story.html" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/israeli_court_women_can_wear_prayer_shawls_while_worshipping_at_the_western_wall/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/israeli_court_women_can_wear_prayer_shawls_while_worshipping_at_the_western_wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pictures of people who mock me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/pictures_of_people_who_mock_me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/pictures_of_people_who_mock_me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years, strangers have made fun of me for being fat. But I got my power back -- by turning the camera on them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was traveling with students in Barcelona in the summer of 2011, walking through La Rambla, when I noticed two guys making fun of me. I could see them in the reflection of a mirrored building, making gestures with their hands to suggest how much bigger I was than the thin girl standing next to me, her small waist accentuated by her crop top and cut-off shorts. They painted her figure in the air like an hourglass. Then they painted my shape like the convex curves of a ball. The guys were saying something, too, but there was only one word I could make out: <em>Gorda</em>. Fat woman.</p><p>I’ve been hearing comments like this for much all my life. Maybe someone else would have yelled at them, or shrunk inside. But I don’t get upset when this happens.</p><p>I pulled out my camera, and set up a shoot.</p><p>For about a year, I’d been taking pictures of strangers’ reactions to me in public for a series I called “Wait Watchers.” I was interested in capturing something I already knew firsthand: If the large women in historical art pieces were walking around today, they would be scorned and ridiculed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/pictures_of_people_who_mock_me/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/pictures_of_people_who_mock_me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>362</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are female-friendly gyms sexist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Londoner sues over women-only hours and gets called a jerk and a "limey nutsack." But he might have a fair point]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a club has a policy of regularly excluding one gender, would you automatically assume it's being sexist? What if the group being shut out is guys?</p><p>That's the question that has set British gym shorts in a proverbial twist in recent weeks, after a man decided to sue London's Kentish Town Sports Centre for offering 442 hours a year for women-only hours.</p><p>Writing last week in the Daily Mail, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2311098/Peter-Lloyd-Why-Im-suing-gym-sexist-women-hours.html#ixzz2RI9kvgaK ">patron Peter Lloyd explained his beef</a> with the gym, noting that "they still charge them the same full-price membership fee as women, but refuse to offer the equivalent option of male-only sessions." Jezebel promptly labeled Lloyd a "jerk," who should <a href="http://jezebel.com/jackass-suing-his-gym-for-their-442-women-only-hours-pe-476604412">"give us our 442 hours a year and stop crying."</a> Wonkette, meanwhile, less charitably referred to him as a <a href="http://wonkette.com/513321/human-rights-hero-sues-sexist-gym-because-of-ladies-only-yoga-classes">"Limey nutsack." </a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margaret Cho: Babies scare me more than anything</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still don't know if I want children. Frankly, I'm not sure I ever want to love anything that much]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">I don’t have children, and I am not sure if I have wanted them or never wanted them. It’s weird not to be able to decide. Kids are great, and many of my friends now have almost-grown-up kids, like in their late teens and early 20s, and I see these tall beings I once held in my arms, and I am alarmed, amused, and I want to cry, just for the passage of time and how it grows us like plants. I think about how, during all these years they’ve grown up, I must have grown down. That’s awful to realize.</p><p dir="ltr">Korean children get a lot of fuss made over them, I guess because life was tough in the old country, and it was a big deal if you survived. There’s a big party thrown when you are 100 days old, followed by another when you make it to one whole year. My parents took a lot of pictures of me at these parties, although I don’t remember a thing as I was really drunk at both. From the pictures I see the cake, though — all these big multicolored rice cakes, each pastel stripe a steamed layer of pounded and steamed rice flour, not sweet like birthday cake but a delicious treat all the same. It looks like a chewy Neapolitan ice cream, or a gay pride flag made of carbs. It’s the best and I want it, but I think wanting that cake isn’t enough reason to have a baby.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/margaret_cho_babies_scare_me_more_than_anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gabrielle Reece: I choose to serve my husband</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabby Reece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laird Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Reece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The volleyball star knows what's "truly" feminine. It's a strange definition]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up is down. Black is white. And, according to Gabby Reece, submissive is strong.</p><p>In an interview Friday on the <a href="http://www.today.com/news/gabby-reece-women-being-submissive-sign-strength-1C9322181">"Today"</a> show, Reece, who is married to surfing superstar Laird Hamilton, discussed her new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451692668/?tag=saloncom08-20">"My Foot Is Too Big for the Glass Slipper"</a> and went at least a few shades of grey by declaring her submissiveness.</p><p>Reece, who was OF COURSE introduced as a "mother, model and former pro beach volleyball star" <em>in that order,</em> explains in the book, "to truly be feminine means being soft, receptive and – look out, here it comes – submissive."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>169</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melissa Harris-Perry doesn&#8217;t want to steal your children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa Harris-Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Caller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Faludi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MSNBC host stirred up a tempest -- but she was right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melissa Harris-Perry thought it was, in her words, <a href="http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/04/09/why-caring-for-children-is-not-just-a-parents-job/">"an uncontroversial comment."</a> But when the MSNBC host and political commenter made a "Lean forward" spot for the network in which she made the bold wish "for Americans to see children as everyone’s responsibility," the conservative spin machine went into extra-frothy mode.</p><p>"We have never invested as much in public education as we should have," she says in the spot. "We haven't had a very collective notion of, these are our children. We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to whole communities. Once it's everybody's responsibility and not just the household's, we start making better investments."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>175</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a more egalitarian Western Wall coming soon?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/is_a_more_egalitarian_western_wall_coming_soon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/is_a_more_egalitarian_western_wall_coming_soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthodox Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women of the wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A compromise between Jewish women and ultra-Orthodox rabbis over prayer at the sacred spot is in the works ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For months, chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel Natan Sharansky has been working to broker a compromise between Jewish women who want to pray at Jerusalem’s Western Wall and the ultra-Orthodox rabbis who have called their presence an “abomination.”</p><p>And a compromise may be on its way, as Jane Eisner at Forward <a href="http://forward.com/articles/174503/sharansky-to-propose-egalitarian-section-at-the-ko/#ixzz2PzYcvLeW">reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>If implemented, the proposal, a product of months of deliberation, would mark a dramatic acknowledgement by the state of Israel that prayer at the Wall — regarded as Judaism’s holiest site and a modern-day symbol of national sovereignty — should include non-Orthodox practice in which men and women pray together. But it is uncertain whether the proposal will satisfy Women of the Wall, who for years have tried to hold full prayer services in the women’s only section and may see this compromise as a betrayal of their mission...</p> <p>Under the proposal, sources said, the area now known as Robinson’s Arch on the southern end of the Wall will be greatly expanded to create a prayer space roughly equivalent to the existing men’s and women’s sections. Egalitarian prayer is currently permitted at the Arch, which is an archaeological site, but that prayer is only available at limited times and with an entrance fee. The expectation is that the enlarged space would be free and open around the clock, as the Kotel is now, but that could not be confirmed.</p> <p>The plan also calls for the plaza surrounding the Wall to expand, so that visitors approaching the site in the Old City could clearly chose between praying at the egalitarian section, or the existing sections reserved only for men and for women. Still under discussion is governance of the new prayer area, but several sources said that they thought it would be run by something other than the Western Wall Heritage Foundation, the organization that currently controls the Kotel.</p></blockquote><p>Women of the Wall head Anat Hoffman has signed off on the proposal while expressing her reservations about its "separate but equal" premise, but the measure still requires approval from the Netanyahu government, "where it may face resistance from Orthodox groups unwilling to share authority over the holy site," Eisner notes.</p><p>h/t <a href="http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/128919/an-egalitarian-section-at-the-western-wall" target="_blank">Adam Chandler at Tablet Magazine</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/is_a_more_egalitarian_western_wall_coming_soon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/is_a_more_egalitarian_western_wall_coming_soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thatcher: A female icon, but not a feminist one</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's better to have women in public life, even those with whom we disagree, than no women in public life at all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have always been women like Margaret Thatcher in power. Never more than one or two at a time, of course. Thatcher was the embodiment of what Katha Pollitt memorably <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1991/04/07/magazine/hers-the-smurfette-principle.html?pagewanted=all&amp;src=pm">called</a> "the Smurfette syndrome," which is when "a group of male buddies will be accented by a lone female, stereotypically defined." She was not a feminist icon, nor any kind of feminist, as she took pains to remind people. "Some of us were making it before women's lib was even thought of," she once sniffed. To make it any more obvious, she might as well have literally kicked the ladder out from under her.</p><p>For decades, Thatcher's gender provided some public relations cover for her most noxious politics. That was true even today in the White House's statement on her death, which included the following treacly sentence: "As a grocer’s daughter who rose to become Britain’s first female prime minister, she stands as an example to our daughters that there is no glass ceiling that can’t be shattered."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;m not a feminist, but&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13263079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These forces of nature may "run the world," but they won't cop to the F-bomb]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">Beyoncé's fierceness <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/twitter_suspects_beyonce_fierceness_caused_super_bowl_blackout/" target="_blank">practically blew the lights</a> out at the Super Bowl this year. Madonna's decades-long career choices have landed her on the Catholic Church's <em>and</em> the Kremlin's <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-398931/Vaticans-fury-Madonna-blasphemy.html" target="_blank">enemies</a> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2190670/Madonna-sued-millions-Russians-offended-support-gay-rights-concert.html" target="_blank">list</a>. Sandra Day O'Connor was responsible for crucial votes in Supreme Court rulings on abortion and affirmative action. These are women who are virtual forces of nature, whether or not you agree with them on every issue.</p><p dir="ltr">So why does the word "feminist" scare them so? Don't they know that, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/why_are_women_scared_to_call_themselves_feminists/" target="_blank">per Salon's Mary Elizabeth Williams</a>: "If you believe in the strength of women ... you’re soaking in feminism"?</p><p dir="ltr">A list of other high-profile, force-of-nature women who may "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmMU_iwe6U" target="_blank">run the world</a>," but won't cop to the F-bomb.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyoncé&#8217;s reluctant feminism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/beyonces_reluctant_feminism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/beyonces_reluctant_feminism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carla Bruni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mrs. Jay-Z is concerned about an "extreme" label]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should come as no surprise that Beyoncé calls herself a feminist. She's self-made, successful and possesses a song catalog that reads like a lady empowerment playlist. What's unusual is the lengths to which Ms. Sasha Fierce herself will go to walk back that simple statement.</p><p>In <a href="http://www.independent.ie/woman/beyonce-is-a-modernday-feminist-29171853.html">a new interview with British Vogue</a>, the 31-year-old hedged when asked if she considers herself a feminist. "That word can be very extreme," she said, before acknowledging, "I guess I am a modern-day feminist. I do believe in equality." Unlike those old-school feminists who are totally opposed to equality, that's what I <em>guess</em>. Beyoncé went on to explain, "I do believe in equality and that we have a way to go and it's something that's pushed aside and something that we have been conditioned to accept. But I'm happily married. I love my husband. I feel like Mrs. Carter is who I am, but more bold and more fearless than I've ever been."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/beyonces_reluctant_feminism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/beyonces_reluctant_feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Journal gets a D in feminism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/wall_street_journal_gets_a_d_in_feminism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/wall_street_journal_gets_a_d_in_feminism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suzy Lee Weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Taranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Patton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In two ridiculous recent stories, the paper brushes off women and their college aspirations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just in from the Wall Street Journal: It's so cute when girls want to go college. Bonus: That's where the husbands are! The paper of record for rich white men has been taking an active interest in the matriculation habits of females of late, and the impression it would like you to have sure isn't one that suggests anything resembling academic ambition or intellectual qualification.</p><p>First, there was the head-scratchingly nonsensical, <a href="http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/01/elizabeth-wurtzel-on-self-help.html">Liz Wurtzel-level self-indulgent</a> tantrum that the paper ran over the weekend, by high school senior Suzy Lee Weiss. Weiss' qualifications for gaining the editorial real estate for an open letter <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324000704578390340064578654.html?">"To (All) the Colleges That Rejected Me"</a> in the Journal? Being the <a href="https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/318407027368017920">"sassy" sister</a> of former Wall Street Journal editorial features editor Bari Weiss, and having a conniption that she "failed to get into the colleges" of her dreams.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/wall_street_journal_gets_a_d_in_feminism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/wall_street_journal_gets_a_d_in_feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
