<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Financial Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/financial_crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Unwinding&#8221;: What&#8217;s gone wrong with America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/the_unwinding_whats_gone_wrong_with_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/the_unwinding_whats_gone_wrong_with_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must-Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george packer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Unwinding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A deeply-reported exploration of the past 35 years of American life gauges the human cost of "freedom"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of George Packer's new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0374102414/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America"</a> as the un-Internet take on the transformation this country has undergone in the past 35 years. It's wide ranging, deeply reported, historically grounded and ideologically restrained. To write "The Unwinding", Packer clearly had to spend a lot of time out of his own habitat and in the company of other people, listening more than talking, and largely keeping his opinions to himself. Imagine that! It's called journalism.</p><p>Packer's inspiration, as he explains in the book's afternotes, was the "U.S.A." trilogy by John Dos Passos, three novels that use a third-person choral method to portray American life in the early 20th century. "The Unwinding," while nonfiction, is narrative rather than polemical or analytic. Each chapter is a story, or an installment in a story, about a person or place. Some of the subjects are famous (Newt Gingrich, Oprah Winfrey, Colin Powell, Alice Waters) because such people, Packer writes, now "occupy the personal place of household gods, and they offer themselves as answers to the riddle of how to live a good or better life." But the key figures, the ones whose trajectories arc through the entire book like ribs or rafters, are unknowns: an African-American factory worker turned organizer in Ohio, a disillusioned lawyer who drifts from public service to finance and back again, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist with extreme libertarian beliefs and a scion of North Carolina tobacco farmers trying to make it as an entrepreneur. In the book's most bravura chapters, the city of Tampa, Fla. serves as yet another character.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/the_unwinding_whats_gone_wrong_with_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/the_unwinding_whats_gone_wrong_with_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warren pushes on failure to prosecute banks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/warren_pushes_on_failure_to_prosecute_banks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/warren_pushes_on_failure_to_prosecute_banks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Jo White]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senator directly addresses heads of three federal agencies about letting Wall Street off the hook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again affirming her identity as the lawmaker trying to hold Wall Street accountable, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is pushing federal agencies over their failure to prosecute a single banking executive despite ample evidence of fraudulent activity leading up to the 2008 crisis.</p><p>In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, current Securities and Exchange Commission Chairwoman Mary Jo White and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Warren challenges decisions to settle with banks, offering a slap on the wrist, as opposed to jail sentences.  whether they had done any cost-benefit research into prosecuting a bank versus settling with one, which is equivalent to a slap on the wrist for a profitable financial institution.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/warren_pushes_on_failure_to_prosecute_banks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/warren_pushes_on_failure_to_prosecute_banks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bailed-out banks misused funds to pay back TARP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/bailed_out_banks_misused_funds_to_pay_back_tarp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/bailed_out_banks_misused_funds_to_pay_back_tarp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Money intended for small-business lending was used by many community banks as a "TARP exit strategy"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money that was intended to boost lending in the wake of the financial crisis was instead used by bailed-out banks to repay TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) funds from the government. A new report from a government watchdog overseeing TARP noted that a number of community banks used small-business lending funds solely to repay the government. Special Inspector General Christy Romero, who authored the report, said that for some small banks, the small-business lending fund "turned out to be little more than a TARP exit strategy."</p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/banks-repay-tarp-with-small-business-lending-fund_n_3050920.html">Via HuffPo:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/bailed_out_banks_misused_funds_to_pay_back_tarp/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/bailed_out_banks_misused_funds_to_pay_back_tarp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former AIG chief pushes forward with lawsuit against government</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/former_aig_chief_pushes_forward_with_lawsuit_against_government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/former_aig_chief_pushes_forward_with_lawsuit_against_government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maurice greenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maurice Greenberg is arguing that the federal bailout that rescued the insurer was unconstitutional]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former AIG executive officer Maurice Greenberg is pushing forward with a lawsuit against the government over its $182 billion rescue of the insurance giant. Although AIG declined to join the lawsuit in January (as the New York Times noted, "the insurer faced an enormous public uproar over the prospect of suing the source of its lifeline"), Greenberg is moving forward with his new company, Starr International Co.</p><p>The Times <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/greenberg-forges-ahead-with-lawsuit-over-a-i-g-bailout/?src=twr">noted</a> that Greenberg's complaint, which was granted class-action status on Monday, "largely restat[es] his arguments that 2008 bailout of the insurer was unconstitutional and wrongly cheated shareholders out of billions of dollars."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/former_aig_chief_pushes_forward_with_lawsuit_against_government/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/former_aig_chief_pushes_forward_with_lawsuit_against_government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holder: Banks too big to prosecute</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/holder_banks_too_big_to_prosecute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/holder_banks_too_big_to_prosecute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Too Big to Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13221640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The A.G.'s comment to the Senate Judiciary Committee points to structural problem with big banks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attorney General Eric Holder admitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that banks are simply too big to prosecute.</p><p>The Justice Department has not brought a single criminal conviction against a Wall Street executive four years after a financial crisis proven to have been precipitated by fraudulent behavior. On Wednesday, Holder admitted that the vast size of major banks and the structural integration in the economy makes criminal prosecutions basically impossible.</p><p>"I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy," Holder said, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/banking-financial-institutions/286583-holder-big-banks-size-complicates-prosecution-effortshave" target="_hplink">according to the Hill</a>. "And I think that is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/holder_banks_too_big_to_prosecute/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/holder_banks_too_big_to_prosecute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Empty suit&#8221; preacher sinks Indiana megachurch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/indiana_mega_church_faces_foreclosure_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/indiana_mega_church_faces_foreclosure_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megachurches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosperity gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Munsey offered his flock eternal salvation. Now his Family Christian Center is facing foreclosure proceedings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A headline caught my eye this morning: "<a href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/indianas-largest-megachurch-faces-new-foreclosure-proceedings-90769/#hIvCFyYwoZEoWMwv.99" target="_blank">Indiana's Largest Megachurch Faces New Foreclosure Proceedings</a>." It made me think of Steve Munsey, an Indiana prosperity preacher I watched in a Decatur, Georgia television studio in 2007, pleading for audience members and viewers to give their money to the Trinity Broadcasting Network.<br /> <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/indiana_mega_church_faces_foreclosure_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/indiana_mega_church_faces_foreclosure_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I let Wall Street walk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/why_i_let_wall_street_walk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/why_i_let_wall_street_walk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanny Breuer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Taibbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Department prosecutor Lanny Breuer gives an unapologetic exit interview to Dealbook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve never seen as relatively unheralded an official as the head of the criminal division at the Justice Department get so many exit interviews in national newspapers.  But Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, who’s retiring to spend more time with his family at white-shoe law firms on Wall Street, has been given multiple chances to make a last impression.  When you spend nearly four years and fail to prosecute anyone of significance for the financial crisis that caused millions of foreclosures, layoffs and a giant hole in the economy that has still not been papered over, I guess you need your pals in the establishment to help you plead your case.</p><p>This interview with the <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/28/breuer-reflects-on-prosecutions-that-were-and-werent/">New York Times’ Dealbook</a> (sponsored today by the financial firm Allianz) is no different. As a prelude, he gets a commendation from former Attorney General and current corporate lawyer Michael Mukasey (always good to have the lawyer from the other side of the table, defending those you could have but chose not to prosecute, praising your work). He gets phantom criticism from unnamed members of “the Occupy Wall Street crowd” and “Rolling Stone magazine,” a reference to Matt Taibbi. There’s no easier way to marginalize critics than to refuse to name them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/why_i_let_wall_street_walk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/why_i_let_wall_street_walk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street wins again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/wall_street_wins_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/wall_street_wins_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schneiderman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanny Breuer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13199741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The secret truth: There never was a “task force” dedicated to ferreting out mortgage fraud]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year ago, President Obama gestured toward the first lady’s box at the State of the Union address at Eric Schneiderman, the attorney general of New York.  Schneiderman had just agreed to co-chair the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities working group, an initiative between state and federal law enforcement officials and bank regulators, designed to investigate and prosecute fraudulent Wall Street activity that led to both the creation of the housing bubble and its collapse. In exchange, Schneiderman dropped his objections to a settlement over some of the banks’ fraudulent post-crash activity, particularly around fraud in foreclosure processing.</p><p><a>Recent</a> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/12/obama-mortgage-crisis_n_2666449.html">profiles</a> of this event have called last night’s State of the Union the “anniversary” of the formation of the working group.  But you can’t really have an anniversary of something that never existed in the first place.  There never was a Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities working group, never a so-called task force dedicated to ferreting out Wall Street fraud -- the deceptive origination of mortgage loans, sale of worthless mortgage-backed securities for huge sums, and subsequent unloading of toxic debt to unsuspecting buyers. The working group fails to exist as a tangible entity to this day.  What does exist is the same years-old Financial Fraud Enforcement Group that serves as a conduit for press releases about investigative actions already in progress.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/wall_street_wins_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/wall_street_wins_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dow ends above 14,000 for first time since fall 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/dow_ends_above_14000_for_first_time_since_fall_2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/dow_ends_above_14000_for_first_time_since_fall_2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow JOnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13188644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rise was propelled by auto sales and optimism over jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — The Dow stock market index closed above 14,000 for the first time since before the financial crisis rocked the world economy.</p><p>Propelled by strong auto sales and optimism about U.S. jobs, the Dow Jones industrial average crossed the line early Friday and continued flirting with the mark all day. The other major stock indexes also rose.</p><p>The Dow was up 149 points to 14,010. It's gained 6.9 percent this year. The Standard &amp; Poor's 500 rose 15 to 1,513. The Nasdaq composite index added 37 to 3,179.</p><p>The government jobs report that pushed stocks forward was mixed. The U.S. said it added 157,000 jobs in January, in line with expectations. But unemployment inched up to 7.9 percent.</p><p>Automakers Toyota, Ford, GM and Chrysler all reported double-digit sales gains for January.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/dow_ends_above_14000_for_first_time_since_fall_2007/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/dow_ends_above_14000_for_first_time_since_fall_2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nearly half of Americans on edge of financial disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/nearly_half_of_americans_on_edge_of_financial_disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/nearly_half_of_americans_on_edge_of_financial_disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13186316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report finds a large percentage of U.S. citizens are one financial blow away from poverty]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://scorecard.assetsandopportunity.org/2013/measure/liquid-asset-poverty-rate">new report </a>from the Corporation for Enterprise Development, 43.9 percent of U.S. households are living on the "edge of financial collapse." The nonprofit organization reported that in the event of "a job loss, health crisis or other income-depleting emergency," these Americans would lack resources to cover basic expenses at the federal poverty level for just three months.</p><p>The report found that even many Americans who would consider themselves middle class, with household incomes of $55,465-$90,000, qualify as “liquid asset poor,” with less than three months' savings for basic expenses. One-quarter (26 percent) of households were found by CFED to be  “net worth asset poor,” meaning that the few assets they do have are overwhelmed by their debts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/nearly_half_of_americans_on_edge_of_financial_disaster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/nearly_half_of_americans_on_edge_of_financial_disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank heist fantasies find an outlet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/bank_heist_fantasies_find_an_outlet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/bank_heist_fantasies_find_an_outlet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank robbery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13186159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California artists run fantasy bank robbery contest pushing ideas about legality and justice after financial crisis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/30/bailout-cost-taxpayers_n_2576057.html">new report </a>on the Troubled Asset Relief Program revealed this week that American taxpayers are still on the hook for billions of dollars sunk into bailed out banks. Meanwhile, more than four years since the financial crisis, not one senior Wall Street executive has faced criminal prosecution for fraud despite widespread allegations that bankers ignored pervasive fraud when buying pools of mortgages. It's little wonder some of us have been dreaming of robbing banks.</p><p>Capturing this sentiment, a group of <a href="http://www.tacticalmagic.org/bankshot.htm">California artists launched a bank heist competition</a>, inviting entrants to dream up and plan out bank robberies. The idea, according to the cultural collective behind the competition, Center for Tactical Magic, is to "re-visit the romantic representation of bank robbers in relation to the current economic and social crises, including: income disparity, unemployment, housing foreclosures, federal bailouts, the LIBOR scandal, and a wealth of other egregious economic indicators." It's a playful idea with a $1,000 cash prize for the best heist proposal, which of course does not ask for real bank heists to be carried out, but raises interesting questions about legality and justice in this time of Wall Street malfeasance and impunity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/bank_heist_fantasies_find_an_outlet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/bank_heist_fantasies_find_an_outlet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transcripts show Fed groping blindly in 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/transcripts_show_fed_groping_blindly_in_2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/transcripts_show_fed_groping_blindly_in_2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13175829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In mid-2007 officials voiced confidence that foreclosures would not lead to a financial crisis ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the precipice of financial meltdown in 2007, the Federal Reserve was groping in the dark according to transcripts of Fed policy meetings released Friday. The very same month the U.S. fell into the worst recession in recent history, a December policy meeting saw the Fed forecast the the U.S. would avoid recession altogether. In a similar meeting in August of that year, the officials remained officials were still skeptical that foreclosures could cause a financial crisis.</p><p>As Wonkblog <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/18/breaking-inside-the-feds-2007-crisis-response/">notes</a> on the transcripts:</p><blockquote><p>In December 2007, the month that the recession is now known to have begun, Fed officials were working from economic projections that would prove wildly inaccurate. They forecast sluggish but sustained growth in 2008 followed by a bounceback in 2009. Staff economist Dave Stockton acknowledged that his was a more optimistic view:</p> <p>“Our forecast could admittedly be read as still painting a pretty benign<br /> picture: Despite all the financial turmoil, the economy avoids recession and, even with steeply higher prices for food and energy and a lower exchange value of the dollar, we achieve some modest edging-off of inflation.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/transcripts_show_fed_groping_blindly_in_2007/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/transcripts_show_fed_groping_blindly_in_2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer finance agency bids to stop predatory lending</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/consumer_finance_agency_bids_to_stop_predatory_lending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/consumer_finance_agency_bids_to_stop_predatory_lending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13167106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new rule forces lenders to take responsibility for their loans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, brainchild of now-Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D.-Mass.), has created the Ability to Repay rule, a set of guidelines for lenders that are designed to protect consumers from predatory lending. The practice of lenders offering mortgages to unqualified homebuyers and then selling the debt to third parties like banks caused the 2008 economic collapse after too many consumers couldn't keep up on their payments.</p><p>Boiled down, the new rules force lenders to take responsibility for the loans they write. It will no longer be possible for lenders to say a customer bears all the responsibility for what they sign. This could curtail overly pushy salesmanship and other lending practices that enabled mortgage lenders to write risky loans before getting them off their books. After the economy cratered there were numerous reports of lenders offering "liar loans" that required minimal or no documentation from customers or deceptively low teaser rates that exploded soon after the loans were signed.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/blog/assuring-consumers-have-access-to-mortgages-they-can-trust//">agency</a> the Ability to Repay rule requires that:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/consumer_finance_agency_bids_to_stop_predatory_lending/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/consumer_finance_agency_bids_to_stop_predatory_lending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facing backlash, AIG won&#8217;t join lawsuit against US</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/facing_backlash_aig_wont_join_lawsuit_against_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/facing_backlash_aig_wont_join_lawsuit_against_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/facing_backlash_aig_wont_join_lawsuit_against_us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bank declined to join former CEO Hank Greenberg's lawsuit over the bailout]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — Facing a certain backlash from Washington and beyond, American International Group won't be joining a shareholder lawsuit against the U.S. government.</p><p>AIG was legally obligated to consider joining the lawsuit being brought against the government by former AIG Chief Executive Maurice Greenberg, who claims that the terms of the $182 billion bailout weren't fair to AIG shareholders.</p><p>The prospect of AIG joining the lawsuit had already triggered outrage. A congressman from Vermont issued a statement telling AIG: "Don't even think about it."</p><p>AIG was rescued from the brink of collapse by the U.S. government at the height of the 2008 financial crisis. The insurance company nearly imploded after making huge bets on mortgage investments that later went wrong.</p><p>The company currently has an ad campaign themed "Thank You America."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/facing_backlash_aig_wont_join_lawsuit_against_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/facing_backlash_aig_wont_join_lawsuit_against_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Elizabeth Warren saved taxpayers $1 billion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/how_elizabeth_warren_saved_taxpayers_1_billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/how_elizabeth_warren_saved_taxpayers_1_billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government\]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13045845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren's work keeping tabs on the bank bailout is a great argument for good government ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Mitt Romney and Barack Obama battle nationally for the right to occupy the White House for the next four years, perhaps the second most contentious significant race in the entire country is occurring in Massachusetts. That is where the Democratic Party's candidate for Senate, self-described advocate for the middle class Elizabeth Warren, faces off against Republican Scott Brown. Polls show the race is close, and the bitterness of the rhetoric matches the polling.</p><p>One of Scott Brown's most consistent arguments is that Elizabeth Warren represents Obama's liberal "tax and spend" policies leading to big government. But a new paper by Stanford political scientist Lucas Puente published in PS. Political Science and Politics shows that Elizabeth Warren's work on the Congressional Oversight Panel was highly advantageous to the taxpayer, saving over a billion dollars money by taking a skeptical approach towards the Treasury Department's bailout plans.</p><p>The issue has to do with an obscure part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, known as warrants. This was a piece of the bailout that was designed to allow the government to profit from its investment in banks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/how_elizabeth_warren_saved_taxpayers_1_billion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/how_elizabeth_warren_saved_taxpayers_1_billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. sues Bank of America for mortgage fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/us_sues_bank_of_america_for_mortgage_fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/us_sues_bank_of_america_for_mortgage_fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Suit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13050920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The filing is the latest in recent series of government civil suits against Wall Street giants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Justice sued Bank of America for mortgage fraud Wednesday, in the latest in a series of civil fraud suits filed by the U.S. government against major banks. According to a <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/49536637">breaking Reuters report</a>, the complaint filed in Manhattan accuses the banking giant of "deliberately generating and then selling thousands of toxic home loans that later defaulted to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."</p><p>According to U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, these loan sales resulted in "countless" foreclosures and over $1 billion in losses. As Salon<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/us_government_sues_wells_fargo_for_mortgage_fraud/"> noted</a> in early October, the U.S. filed a fraud complaint against Wells Fargo and, in September, a joint federal and state task force sued JPMorgan Chase for deceptive practices related to the sale of mortgage-backed securities. All of these suits, including today's BofA filing, are civil and may result in monetary penalties for banks, but no jail time for bankers.</p><p>As I wrote following the Wells Fargo complaint filing, "although many welcome the government going after Wall Street, <a href="http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/10/01/schneiderman-sues-jpmorgan-chase-lawsuit-mirrors-old-cases/">critical pundits</a> have raised questions about the timing, noting that the Obama administration might be projecting a tough-on-banks stance with the election countdown in mind."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/us_sues_bank_of_america_for_mortgage_fraud/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/us_sues_bank_of_america_for_mortgage_fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs tell-all tells little</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/goldman_sachs_tell_all_tells_little/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/goldman_sachs_tell_all_tells_little/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13048259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Smith's "Why I Left" book shows a naive author and Wall Street misdeeds we know all too much about already]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Smith, the former Goldman Sachs vice president who told the world he was quitting with a New York Times Op-Ed in March, released "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Why-Left-Goldman-Sachs-Street/dp/1455527475/saloncom08-20">Why I Left</a>," his tell-all book on the investment firm, Monday.</p><p>The book, "Why I left Goldman Sachs: A Wall Street Story," promised to elaborate on his essay, which decried Goldman for deceiving clients in order to earn the firm as much money as possible, even when it meant betting against a client's interest.</p><p>“I knew in my heart there was simply something deeply wrong with the way people were behaving, in the way they didn’t care about the repercussions, in the way they saw their clients as adversaries,” Smith wrote in his book,<a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/is-greg-smith-believable/"> according to</a> a New York Times preview. Speaking to "60 Minutes" on Sunday night, the 33-year-old former equity derivatives salesman said that naive clients were considered a "golden prize": “[The] quickest way to make money on Wall Street," he said, "is to take the most sophisticated product and try to sell it to the least sophisticated client.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/goldman_sachs_tell_all_tells_little/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/goldman_sachs_tell_all_tells_little/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise of the celebrity economist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/rise_of_the_celebrity_economist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/rise_of_the_celebrity_economist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13031496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Markets are as unstable as during any point in American history -- and a select few have found a way to capitalize]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year after Lehman Brothers collapsed, Paul Krugman took his fellow economists to task over a host of professional and intellectual failures. With the <em>New York Times</em> as his pulpit, he began his omniscient narration: “The central cause of the profession’s failure was the desire for an all-encompassing, intellectually elegant approach that also gave economists a chance to show off their mathematical prowess. Unfortunately, this romanticized and sanitized vision of the economy led most economists to ignore all the things that can go wrong,” he wrote. “They turned a blind eye to the limitations of human rationality… to the problems of institutions that run amok; to the imperfections of markets… and to the dangers created when regulators don’t believe in regulation.”</p><p><a href="http://thenewinquiry.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thenewinquiry.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/header1.jpg" alt="The New Inquiry" width="150" align="left" /></a>Despite this indictment, economists have not only retained their prominence in the years since the global financial crisis; they have expanded it. Media-savvy economists have only grown in number, disseminating nuggets of user-friendly economic theory and technocratic liberalism in newspaper columns, blogs, and econo-centric podcasts. Krugman, along with Joseph Stiglitz, Nouriel Roubini, Nassim Taleb, and Jeffrey Sachs have become household names as swaggering political pundits.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/rise_of_the_celebrity_economist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/rise_of_the_celebrity_economist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JPMorgan suit is first for mortgage task force</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/jpmorgan_suit_is_first_for_mortgage_task_force/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/jpmorgan_suit_is_first_for_mortgage_task_force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Attorny Genera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schneiderman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13027720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a complaint Monday against the bank]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late Monday, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase alleging deceptive practices related to the sale of mortgage-backed securities when the housing bubble was close to bursting.</p><p>The complaint is the first to be filed by the joint federal and state task force formed in early 2012 to hold Wall Street banks accountable for their role in the financial crisis. The civil suit against Bear Stearns (acquired by JPMorgan in 2008) alleges that the bank "kept investors in the dark" about the quality of mortgage-backed bonds it was securitizing and selling between 2005 and 2007.</p><p>The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/02/business/suit-accuses-jpmorgan-unit-of-broad-misconduct-on-mortgage-securities.html">reports:</a></p><blockquote><p>The firms made material misrepresentations about the quality of the loans in the securities, the lawsuit said, and ignored evidence of broad defects among the loans that they pooled and sold to investors.</p> <p>Moreover, when Bear Stearns identified problematic loans that it had agreed to purchase from a lender, it was required to make the originator buy them back. But Bear Stearns demanded cash payments from the lenders and kept the money, rather than passing it on to investors, the suit contends.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/jpmorgan_suit_is_first_for_mortgage_task_force/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/jpmorgan_suit_is_first_for_mortgage_task_force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
