<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Fiscal cliff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/fiscal_cliff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Congress: Worst reality TV show ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/congress_worst_reality_tv_show_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/congress_worst_reality_tv_show_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kardashians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fiscal cliff was a manufactured crisis with an obvious ending. And the breathless coverage obscured the facts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the halcyon 1990s, we labeled annual congressional temper tantrums for what they were: standard, if boring, budget impasses. Now, though, in a hilariously non-ironic flail for ratings, news outlets have taken Nigel Tufnel's famous line from “Spinal Tap” seriously, turning the volume up to 11 by portraying the latest standoff as a harrowing "fiscal cliff," replete with doomsday countdown clocks, gaudy NFL-quality graphics, and endless Twitter hashtags.</p><p>If anyone outside the Beltway was paying attention (a big "if"), they probably thought the title referred to an old episode of “Cheers” in which the goofy mailman does his taxes. After all, replaying reruns would have been more compelling content than this latest installment of "Real World: U.S. Capitol."</p><p>Reality TV, of course, is this moment's perfect metaphor. That schlocky format's foundational oxymoron -- it is "real" but not real -- also defines contemporary politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/congress_worst_reality_tv_show_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/congress_worst_reality_tv_show_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give Obama a break on the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/give_obama_a_break_on_the_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/give_obama_a_break_on_the_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habeas corpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president deserves credit for his handling of the crisis -- so long as he doesn't cave on the debt ceiling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> When President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus in 1862 (a couple of times, actually), he conceded the possible unconstitutionality of what he had done but concluded that since the move was necessary in a time when half the country was at war with the other half, he would take his chances with Congress, the courts, and history. The country’s current chief executive finds Lincoln comparisons disconcerting, but this is a case where he might pay attention, because his legal grounds for unilaterally raising the ceiling on the national debt in a time of congressionally inflicted crisis are no weaker than Lincoln’s and probably stronger.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/give_obama_a_break_on_the_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/give_obama_a_break_on_the_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weakened Boehner still likely to hang on to speakership</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House speaker has been lambasted by multiple factions within the GOP, but he's likely to retain his title]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though House Speaker John Boehner is poised to hang on to his speakership in Thursday's vote, he enters the new session of Congress considerably weaker than the last.</p><p>Boehner has been hearing it from both flanks of his caucus, with 151 members of his own party voting against the "fiscal cliff" deal, and Republican New York Reps. Peter King and Michael Grimm expressing outrage that Republican leadership failed to call a vote over Hurricane Sandy relief aid.</p><p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/275335-boehner-pelosi-facing-defections-as-house-votes-for-speaker">The Hill</a> reported this morning:</p><blockquote><p>Boehner could also face opposition from the four Republicans punished this month for bucking leadership. Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.), Tim Huelskamp (Kan.), Walter Jones (N.C.) and Dave Schweikert (Ariz.) were all stripped of their committee posts by the Boehner-led GOP Steering Committee, and they've been grumbling ever since.</p> <p>There has been speculation that 17 Republicans could join forces and deny Boehner the majority he needs to become Speaker. House rules dictate that a lawmaker must receive a majority of the votes in order to get the Speaker's gavel. Republican lawmakers, including one who is not fond of Boehner, said no such effort is under way.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/weakened_boehner_still_likely_to_hang_on_to_speakership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans face Tea Party backlash after &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; vote</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/republicans_face_tea_party_backlash_after_fiscal_cliff_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/republicans_face_tea_party_backlash_after_fiscal_cliff_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives are eyeing Republican primaries after their leadership pushed through the "fiscal cliff" deal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans are facing potential backlash from Tea Partyers for supporting the "fiscal cliff" deal, which wound up passing without the support of many of the more conservative members of the party.</p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/03/us-usa-fiscal-teaparty-idUSBRE90200U20130103">Nick Carey of Reuters</a> reports that in the Senate, Tea Party groups are eyeing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Ky., Saxby Chambliss, Ga., Lindsey Graham, S.C., and Lamar Alexander, Tenn., all of whom are up for reelection in 2014.</p><p>"Many people here have watched Mitch McConnell's voting record and are dissatisfied with what they've seen," Eric Wilson, executive director of the Tea Party group the Kentucky 9/12 Project, told Reuters. "There are some potential candidates working in the background and doing the right thing."</p><p>"If a credible candidate comes forward, then Saxby Chambliss is in major trouble," said Debbie Dooley, a founder of the Atlanta Tea Party.</p><p>"I am over 90 percent certain that if there is a reliably conservative candidate in 2014 he will have my total support," Joe Dugan of the Myrtle Beach Tea Party in South Carolina also told Reuters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/republicans_face_tea_party_backlash_after_fiscal_cliff_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/republicans_face_tea_party_backlash_after_fiscal_cliff_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest fiscal cliff lessons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pelosi still speaker. Obama still open to cutting Medicare, Social Security. U.S. still run by and for the wealthy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite boasting on both sides that Congress finally made a deal on the so-called fiscal cliff, people looking for details about the deal's ultimate outcome are going to have to wait until March. (A lot of important people had vacations ruined, so they have a stake in pretending something big got accomplished.)</p><p>There's no way to know how bad or good a deal Democrats cut until the conflict they postponed is resolved, and we know what it takes to lift the debt ceiling, keep the government running and deal with the "sequester" – the combination of automatic spending cuts to defense and to social programs baked into the original debt ceiling deal back in August 2011.</p><p>As someone who believed, and still believes, that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_case_against_cooperation/">it was best for the country if Democrats stood up to Republican hostage takers and went over the cliff</a>, I have to admit President Obama and his chief negotiator Vice President Joe Biden got some good things with this deal. Unemployment benefits were extended for 2 million Americans and so were tax credits that help the working and middle class. The deal also kept student-loan interest rates low. Lots of Democrats are also celebrating the fact that Republicans voted for their first tax-rate increase in 20 years. But since the White House got far less in revenue than it originally asked for, we'll see how great a concession that turned out to be, since the deal kept tax rates low for millions of wealthy Americans, and ceded crucial hikes on estates and investment income for the super-rich.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics has become the new reality TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/politics_has_become_the_new_reality_tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/politics_has_become_the_new_reality_tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With politicians shamelessly mugging during the "fiscal cliff" crisis, D.C. really is Hollywood for ugly people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politico's <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/the-fiscal-cliff-deal-that-almost-wasnt-85663.html">well-reported narrative</a> of the fiscal cliff negotiations begins with an inevitable anecdote:</p><blockquote><p>“Go f— yourself,” Boehner sniped as he pointed his finger at Reid, according to multiple sources present.</p> <p>Reid, a bit startled, replied: “What are you talking about?”</p> <p>Boehner repeated: “Go f— yourself.”</p> <p>The harsh exchange just a few steps from the Oval Office — which Boehner later bragged about to fellow Republicans ...</p></blockquote><p>I love those blushing em dashes, as if the four-letter word itself would scandalize Politico's hard-bitten audience.</p><p>Years ago Vice President Dick Cheney expressed himself similarly, addressing Sen. Patrick Leahy, D.-Vt.). While the remark made it into the press, it's fair to take Cheney at his word. The veep later <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYY1oDDYS18">congratulated himself</a> for his bravado.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/politics_has_become_the_new_reality_tv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/politics_has_become_the_new_reality_tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who were the Democrats who voted against &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; deal?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/who_were_the_democrats_who_voted_against_fiscal_cliff_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/who_were_the_democrats_who_voted_against_fiscal_cliff_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "fiscal cliff" bill, which split House Republican leadership, also saw opposition from Dems in both chambers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the deal to avoid the "fiscal cliff" passed with overwhelming Democratic support, there were those in both the House and the Senate who were disappointed with the legislation that Congress ultimately pushed through.</p><p>In the House, 172 Democrats voted for the bill, with 16 who opposed it. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/02/the-fiscal-cliff-how-the-house-voted/">Of the 16</a>, nine lean more liberal, including Rep. Peter DeFazio, Ore., who <a href="http://www.defazio.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=804%3Astatement-on-fiscal-cliff-vote&amp;catid=69%3A2012-press-releases&amp;Itemid=1">explained</a>:</p><blockquote><p>While the Senate plan included an extension of unemployment insurance that will save benefits for over 29,000 Oregonians and an essential ‘doc-fix’ that will continue payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients, this ‘deal’ hinders our ability to deal meaningfully with the deficit and burgeoning debt and puts in jeopardy Social Security and Medicare in the coming confrontation over the debt limit.</p></blockquote><p>Jim Moran, Va., also more liberal, <a href="http://moran.house.gov/press-release/moran-statement-fiscal-cliff-legislation">argued</a> that the bill just paves the way for three more showdowns over the budget:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/who_were_the_democrats_who_voted_against_fiscal_cliff_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/who_were_the_democrats_who_voted_against_fiscal_cliff_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 painful lessons from the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/4_painful_lessons_from_the_fiscal_cliff_crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/4_painful_lessons_from_the_fiscal_cliff_crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Camp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may be over, but a new crisis looms. The question now is whether Democrats will cave on the debt ceiling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I’m glad that’s over.</p><p>Now that the House has passed the Senate compromise bill, the full spate of tax increases and spending cuts that went into effect yesterday will be <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/01/wonkbook-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-fiscal-cliff-deal/?hpid=z2">shut off</a> (though the sequester was just suspended for a couple of months).  Still, I don’t mean to be a downer, but any relief you feel should be analogized to how much better you feel when you stop banging a hammer on your head.  We’ve avoided, for the moment, a self-made trap.  Now, of course, we’re on to the next one—the debt ceiling, which really is a cliff in that to go over it (can you “go over” a ceiling?) is to default.</p><p>The resolution of the fiscal cliff was much as I and others predicted—a very short trip over the cliff—more of a bungee jump, really.  As we said, once House R’s could label a vote for the compromise a net tax <em>cut</em>, enough of them could vote for it.  In fact, one of their leaders, Dave Camp (R-MI) sold the measure to his caucus as the “largest tax cut in American history.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/4_painful_lessons_from_the_fiscal_cliff_crisis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/4_painful_lessons_from_the_fiscal_cliff_crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; deal is simply awful</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_fiscal_cliff_deal_is_simply_awful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_fiscal_cliff_deal_is_simply_awful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All it ensures is another standoff in 2-3 months, only now the White House has lost all of its leverage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> So, we have <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/01/senate-dems-vote-overwhelmingly-to-avert-fiscal-cliff.php">a modest deal</a> in place to avert the contrived crisis known as the fiscal cliff. Washington is celebrating the fact that Congress averted the disaster that it created out of thin air last year.</p><p>Some say that it's not a bad deal on its merits, but we'll have to await final judgment until we see what happens with the debt ceiling, which has to be raised in the next two months. If the White House stands firm on its refusal to negotiate over the debt ceiling again, and doesn't give any more concessions, then we can look back at this deal as a pretty good one, on balance.</p><p>I suspect this will become the center-left conventional wisdom, and only dirty hippies will be bitching. So pass the patchouli, because I hate this deal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_fiscal_cliff_deal_is_simply_awful/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_fiscal_cliff_deal_is_simply_awful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fiscal cliff&#8221; deal paves way for potential debt ceiling fight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/fiscal_cliff_deal_sets_up_potential_debt_ceiling_fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/fiscal_cliff_deal_sets_up_potential_debt_ceiling_fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Tax Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's fiscal cliff "victory" may be short-lived as another showdown with the House GOP is already on the horizon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress was able to eke out a deal to pull the country back from the "fiscal cliff" last night, but likely teed itself up for an even bigger fight in two months over the debt ceiling.</p><p>The plan that passed will raise $620 billion in revenue over 10 years and pay down the sequester for two months. It only got 85 votes from House Republicans, with 151 voting against it. Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., was one of the more notable yes votes, though House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., and House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., both voted against it.</p><p>And though the deal pulls the country back from painful fiscal cliff cuts, it's only temporary. The sequester is paid down for two months, not-so-coincidentally timed with when the government will reach its spending limit and Congress will have to vote to raise the debt ceiling.</p><p>From the <a href="http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2013-01-02-Fiscal%20Cliff/id-e6d155e3807c4f9a85b555f8b96430b5">AP</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/fiscal_cliff_deal_sets_up_potential_debt_ceiling_fight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/fiscal_cliff_deal_sets_up_potential_debt_ceiling_fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House passes fiscal cliff compromise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/in_turnabout_house_charges_toward_fiscal_cliff_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/in_turnabout_house_charges_toward_fiscal_cliff_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 03:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: Democrats, joined by Boehner but not Cantor, lead a bipartisan push to approve the Senate agreement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATED: In a surprise late night vote, the House passed legislation to avoid the fiscal cliff, concurring with the agreement negotiated in the Senate.</p><p>The vote was 257-167 -- a bipartisan vote, though it was led overwhelmingly by Democratic support.</p><p>Among Republicans, the vote was 151-86 against the compromise. John Boehner and Paul Ryan were among the minority of Republicans who supported the compromise; Eric Cantor voted no. That led to immediate speculation among pundits that Boehner's position as speaker of the House could be in doubt in the next Congress.</p><p>Weary lawmakers hoped to avoid a national "fiscal cliff" of major tax increases and spending cuts in a New Year's Night culmination of a struggle that tested divided government to the limit.</p><p>Passage sent the measure to President Barack Obama for his signature and handed him a political triumph less than two months after he secured re-election while campaigning for higher taxes on the wealthy.</p><p>"Everybody worked very hard on it and I appreciate it," Obama said, in a late night appearance at the White House.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/in_turnabout_house_charges_toward_fiscal_cliff_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/in_turnabout_house_charges_toward_fiscal_cliff_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Cantor: I won&#8217;t support fiscal cliff deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/eric_cantor_i_wont_support_fiscal_cliff_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/eric_cantor_i_wont_support_fiscal_cliff_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate compromise quickly runs into trouble from Republicans in the House, who want more spending cuts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate-approved compromise to avert the "fiscal cliff" ran headlong into opposition from the No. 2 House Republican and other GOP lawmakers Tuesday, raising questions about how - and in what form - Congress might be able to give final approval to the measure.</p><p>"I do not support the bill," Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., told reporters after Republicans held a lengthy closed-door meeting to gauge support for the compromise. Cantor is an influential leader of conservatives and younger Republicans in the House.</p><p>Rep. Steve LaTourette, R-Ohio, and other participants said the overwhelming sentiment among House Republicans was to amend the bill to incorporate more spending cuts and send it back to the Senate. Several lawmakers and aides said such a move was likely, and on balance the GOP reaction seemed to seriously complicate efforts to enact a new law before the current Congress expires on Thursday.</p><p>"The speaker and leader laid out options to the members and listened to feedback," said Brendan Buck, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. "The lack of spending cuts in the Senate bill was a universal concern amongst members in today's meeting. Conversations with members will continue throughout the afternoon on the path forward."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/eric_cantor_i_wont_support_fiscal_cliff_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/eric_cantor_i_wont_support_fiscal_cliff_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate passes bill to avert &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/senate_passes_bill_to_avert_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/senate_passes_bill_to_avert_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The vote was an overwhelming 89-8 and came well after midnight on New Year's Day]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate has passed legislation to block the impact of across-the-board tax increases and spending cuts that make up the fiscal cliff.</p><p>The vote was an overwhelming 89-8 and came well after midnight on New Year's Day.</p><p>A House vote is expected before Wednesday.</p><p>The White House-backed legislation would prevent middle-class taxes from rising, and raise rates on incomes over $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for couples.</p><p>It also blocks spending cuts for two months, extends unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless, prevents a 27 percent cut in fees for doctors who treat Medicare patients and prevents a spike in milk prices.</p><p>A last-minute addition would also prevent a $900 pay raise for members of Congress from taking effect in March.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/senate_passes_bill_to_avert_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/senate_passes_bill_to_avert_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why 2013 is going to be awful</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13158946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's to a year of austerity, dysfunction, lousy Obama negotiations -- and no "Louie"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is 2012 is over and will never happen again. The bad news is, now it's 2013. Here's why I'm not holding out hope for a great year in politics:</p><p><strong>Austerity</strong></p><p>It's coming. Congress will obsess over crafting a long-term deficit deal no matter what happens with the tax rates and the sequester. In all likelihood, we'll get regressive budget cuts at all levels of government, plus, for good measure, tax hikes not just on the rich but on working people. The well-funded "Fix the Debt" monsters will still demand massive cuts to Social Security and Medicare. Republicans are justifiably confident that they can use the debt ceiling to force more spending cuts less than a month from now. If all of this sinks the still-sluggish economic recovery, that'll be just one more sign that we need to cut more, and "tighten our belts." Plus the debt ceiling fight might just crash the world economy anyway.</p><p><strong>Congress Isn't Going to Do Anything</strong></p><p>As historically unproductive as the 112th Congress was, there's not much reason to expect more from the 113th. The Senate has gotten marginally more liberal and the House has gotten marginally less Republican, but the basic makeup of both is the same. It's still the case that House Republicans have no incentive to compromise on anything, while Senate Democrats live to compromise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reports: Fiscal cliff vote unlikely tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/reports_fiscal_cliff_vote_unlikely_tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/reports_fiscal_cliff_vote_unlikely_tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13158984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED:Congressional Republicans were offended by Obama's suggestion that they're inefficient]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated: December 31, 5:04 p.m.: </strong>Numerous sources reported that there would not be a fiscal cliff vote tonight</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Following  weeks of hysteria, numerous news outlets are reporting that the House of Representatives may nDATEot even vote on a fiscal cliff deal before the tax hikes and spending cuts take effect at midnight tonight.</p><p>Here's CNN's <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/31/house-unlikely-to-vote-on-any-deal-until-after-cliff-deadline/?cid=sf_twitter">take</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The reason is partly about process, but the benefit is political.</p> <p>House GOP sources said the main reason the House is not likely to vote before the deadline is because the deal is not yet done, and it still has to go through the Senate–which takes time.</p> <p>GOP leaders prefer to vote in broad daylight, sources said, instead of in the middle of the night.</p> <p>"There is no difference in voting at 2 a.m. than tomorrow at 4 p.m.," one of the GOP sources said.</p> <p>GOP sources admitted there is an added benefit to the Senate's delay: taxes would already be up, so lawmakers could argue that they are voting for tax cuts, as opposed to tax increases.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/reports_fiscal_cliff_vote_unlikely_tonight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/reports_fiscal_cliff_vote_unlikely_tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 states set for minimum wage hike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/10_states_set_for_minimum_wage_hike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/10_states_set_for_minimum_wage_hike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13158968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the expiring payroll tax cut could wipe out the meagre gains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minimum wage workers in 10 states will get raise in 2013, CNN <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2012/12/31/pf/states-minimum-wage/">reports</a>.</p><p>Employees in Rhode Island will see the biggest gains as the state voted to raise the minimum 35 cents per hour to $7.75. This translates into a bump of about $510 per year for the average worker. Nine other state minimums are climbing automatically as the result of laws that peg the minimum wage to increases in the cost of living.</p><p>CNN:</p><blockquote><p>An estimated 855,000 workers will be directly affected by the wage changes, while another 140,000 are projected to be indirectly affected by the changes as employers readjust their pay scales to accommodate the new minimum, according to analysis by the Economic Policy Institute.</p> <p>The new hourly rates will range between $7.35 in Missouri and $9.19 in Washington state, which has the highest minimum wage in the nation.</p> <p>Workers may not notice much of a change in their paychecks, though, if lawmakers do not extend the payroll tax cut first enacted in 2010. Without the tax cut in place, workers would pay 6.2% instead of 4.2% -- an amount that could wipe out most of the wage boost.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/10_states_set_for_minimum_wage_hike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/10_states_set_for_minimum_wage_hike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: An agreement is &#8220;within sight&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/obamaan_agreement_is_within_sight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/obamaan_agreement_is_within_sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13158894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Serious deficit reduction requires "shared sacrifice" the president said, without giving specifics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama said that a Congressional deal was possible before the so-called "fiscal cliff" kicks in.</p><p>Speaking before an appreciative audience his tart speech lightly mocked Congress and emphasized that any deal would include tax hikes on the rich and some types of spending cuts.</p><p>Watch (The speech begins at the 49 minute mark.):</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/85snK7MPQPo" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/obamaan_agreement_is_within_sight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/obamaan_agreement_is_within_sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prepare for the mini-cliffs: Wind and dairy on the brink</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/prepare_for_the_mini_cliffs_wind_and_dairy_on_the_brink/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/prepare_for_the_mini_cliffs_wind_and_dairy_on_the_brink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dairy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13158578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Congress stave off two industry crises?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the umpteenth day in a row rhetoric and speculation about the fiscal cliff dominated the news cycle. No one knows exactly what will happen if this unholy marriage  of tax hikes and spending cuts takes effect, but a few industries are facing their own mini-cliffs and it's easier to predict the aftermath.</p><p>First, there's what might be called the windy cliff. In 1992 the government created a production tax credit to incentivize the use of clean, domestic wind power.  The subsidy is a 2.2 cent credit per kilowatt hour of energy produced over ten years, amounting to about <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20857530">$1 million per large turbine</a>. Since the initial credit was enacted, it has been renewed seven times and has been allowed to expire three times.</p><p>The tax credit expires for the fourth time at midnight tonight. That's too bad for fans of clean, domestic power since this tax credit works. It has been in place <a href="http://environmental.laws.com/environmental-news/wind-energy-tax-credit-may-expire-by-end-of-2012-36033.html">since 2004</a> and U.S. wind generating capacity increased <a href="http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=5350">almost six-fold between 2006 and 2011</a> and now accounts for about<a href="http://energy.nationaljournal.com/2012/12/should-congress-support-wind-t.php"> three percent of electricity generation</a> nationwide.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/prepare_for_the_mini_cliffs_wind_and_dairy_on_the_brink/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/prepare_for_the_mini_cliffs_wind_and_dairy_on_the_brink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if we go over the fiscal cliff?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/over_the_fiscal_cliff_soft_or_hard_landing_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/over_the_fiscal_cliff_soft_or_hard_landing_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/over_the_fiscal_cliff_soft_or_hard_landing_5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A collapse in negotiations would be a rocky start for 2013]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Efforts to save the nation from going over a year-end "fiscal cliff" were still in disarray as lawmakers returned to the Capitol to confront the tax-and-spend crisis. A tone-setting quotation was Democratic Sen. Harry Reid's assertion that the House under Republican Speaker John Boehner had been "operating with a dictatorship."</p><p>President Barack Obama flew back to Washington from Hawaii after telephoning congressional leaders from his Christmas vacation perch. Once back, he set up a meeting with leaders of both parties at the White House late Friday to make a fresh attempt to find a solution before Monday night's deadline.</p><p>A look at why it's so hard for Republicans and Democrats to compromise on urgent matters of taxes and spending, and what happens if they fail to meet their deadline:</p><p>___</p><p>NEW YEAR'S HEADACHE</p><p>Partly by fate, partly by design, some scary fiscal forces come together at the start of 2013 unless Congress and Obama act to stop them. They include:</p><p>— Some $536 billion in tax increases, touching nearly all Americans, because various federal tax cuts and breaks expire at year's end.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/over_the_fiscal_cliff_soft_or_hard_landing_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/over_the_fiscal_cliff_soft_or_hard_landing_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP demands Social Security cuts, setting back fiscal talks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/gop_demands_social_security_cuts_setting_back_fiscal_talks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/gop_demands_social_security_cuts_setting_back_fiscal_talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Obama made similar proposal within a broad package, Dems reject the measure as part of scaled-back deal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what Democratic aides told reporters was a "major setback" in fiscal cliff negotiations, Republicans proposed throwing a Social Security cut into the scaled-back deal Congress is attempting to cobble together in advance of the New Year deadline. As things stand at the time of writing, negotiations are close to breakdown.</p><p>Aides to Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell presented the Social Security proposal, which included a method of calculating benefits with inflation. The plan would lower cost of living increases for Social Security recipients. Democrats were swift to reject the offer.</p><p>A Democratic aide told <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/fiscal-cliff-talks-hit-major-setback-social-security/story?id=18095739&amp;page=2#.UOCptLamAeM">ABC News</a> that the proposal was a "poisoned pill" in the current negotiations. However, it should be noted that President Obama has suggested a similar proposal within the context of negotiations on a broad deficit-reduction deal. Such a measure had been taken off the table in discussions over a scaled-back, short-term agreement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/gop_demands_social_security_cuts_setting_back_fiscal_talks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/gop_demands_social_security_cuts_setting_back_fiscal_talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>